Sri S. Nageswara Rao

Senior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli

II Addl JCJ Court, Sattenapalli · Guntur · Andhra Pradesh

Sri S. Nageswara Rao, Senior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli, is posted at II Addl JCJ Court, Sattenapalli, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India. 1,014 court orders on record since 2019. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, H, EP cases.

1,014

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

H.M.O.P/31/2021

Dupati Naga Lakshmi vs Dupati Paparao

30 Sep 2021

In the Court of the Senior Civil Judge: Sattenapalli,

Present:-S. Nageswara Rao,

Senior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli,

Thursday, this the 30th day of September, 2021,

HMOP No.31 of 2021

Between:

Dupati Naga Lakshmi, W/o.Papa Rao, D/o.Kakarla Nageswara Rao, Hindu, 34 years, Housewife, R/o.D. No.3-162, Rajaka Colony, Pesapadu village, Krosuru Mandal, Guntur District.

...Petitioner

And

Dupati Papa Rao, S/o.Late Konda Swami, Hindu, 37 years, R/o.D. No.3-47, Main Road, Vatticherukuru Mandal.

Guntur District. ...Respondent

This petition is coming on this day i.e., on 30.09.2021

before me for hearing in the presence of Sri K.N.V. Hari Babu,

Advocate for the Petitioner and Respondent exparte, upon hearing and considering the material on record, having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court made the following:

O R D E R

This is a petition Under Section 13 (1) (ia) and (ib) of the

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for dissolution of the marriage of the petitioner/wife with the respondent/husband with the following averments.

02.The petitioner is the legally wedded wife of the respondent and their marriage was solemnized on 22.04.2004 at Sri Sri Sri

Rukuminisametha Venugopala Swamy Temple, at Vatticherukuru village of respondent as per Hindu, rites and caste custom, in the presence of village and caste elders. Immediately, after the marriage the petitioner joined the respondent to lead marital life and their marriage was duly consummated. They lived together happily for a period of six years. During their wedlock they were blessed two 2 female children by name Neelima now aged 15 years and Sai Alekya now aged 12 years. Subsequently, the respondent addicted to bad vices and harassing the petitioner mentally and physically, developed dislike towards the petitioner for additional dowry and stated that she is not suitable for him. In the year 2009 the respondent shifted his family to the village of parents of the petitioner i.e., Peesapadu village and also harassing the petitioner mentally and physically for want of

additional dowry from her parents. In the month of June, 2018 the

respondent beat the petitioner cruelly and drove her along with female children from his matrimonial home. Having no other to the petitioner along with her children reached to her parents house. The parents of the petitioner and elders made mediation, trying to convey the respondent, but the respondent did not accept the words of the elders and did not change his attitude and bluntly refused the petitioner to take into his life. Due to the attitude of the respondent, the petitioner suffered mentally and physically and there is no hope on the respondent to lead marital life with the petitioner and no chance of reconciliation. Hence, she is constrained to file this petition for divorce.

03.Respondent remained exparte.

04.The petitioner examined herself as P.W.1 and marked

Exs.P1 to P5 on her behalf.

05.Heard arguments of the counsel for the petitioner.

06.Now the point for consideration is:

Whether the petitioner is entitled for dissolution of the marriage as prayed for?

07.Petitioner seeks to dissolve the marriage with the respondent on the grounds of cruelty as well as desertion. In the case of desertion, the petitioner has to prove that the respondent deserted her for the period more than two years, prior to the institution of the petition. In this case, the petitioner as P.W.1, reiterated the petition averments in her chief examination affidavit and produced Exs.P1 to

P5. Ex.P1 is the Lagna Pathrika of the petitioner and respondent,

Ex.P2 is the wedding card, Ex.P3 is the marriage photographs of the petitioner and respondent, showing the marriage of the petitioner with the respondent. Ex.P4 is the copy of Aadhaar card of the petitioner and Ex.P5 is the copy of Aadhaar card of the respondent. The unrebutted evidence of P.W.1 establishes that the respondent subjected the petitioner to cruelty. So, on the ground of cruelty, the petitioner is entitled for dissolution of the marriage with the respondent.

08.The petitioner deposed that in the month of June, 2018, the respondent beat the petitioner cruelly for want of additional dowry from her parents house and respondent deserted the petitioner along with her two female children from matrimonial home at about three years back and she along with her female children went to her parents house. The petition was filed on 27.01.2021 i.e., more than two years after the said date of desertion. So, the petitioner is able to prove that she was deserted by the respondent for more than two years prior to the presentation of the petition. Accordingly, the petitioner is also entitled for dissolution of the marriage on the ground of desertion.

Accordingly, the petitioner established her case for dissolution of 4 marriage on the two grounds urged by her and thereafter, she is entitled for decree for dissolution of marriage as prayed for.

09.In the result, petition is allowed and the marriage of the petitioner with the respondent, is dissolved by decree of divorce under section 13 (1) (ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. No costs.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and

pronounced by me in open Court, this the 30th day of September,

2021.

Senior Civil Judge,

Sattenapalli. Appendix of Evidence Witnesses Examined

For Petitioner: For Respondent:

P.W.1-Dupati Naga Lakshmi.- Exparte -

Exhibits Marked

For Petitioner: For Respondent:

Ex.P1-Lagna Pathrika of the petitioner and respondent,- N I L - Ex.P2-Wedding card, Ex.P3-Marriage photographs of the petitioner and respondent, Ex.P4-Copy of Aadhaar card of the petitioner, Ex.P5-Copy of Aadhaar card of the respondent.

Senior Civil Judge,

Sattenapalli.

In the Court of the Senior Civil Judge: Sattenapalli,

Present:-S. Nageswara Rao,

Senior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli,

Thursday, this the 30th day of September, 2021,

HMOP No.31 of 2021

Between:

Dupati Naga Lakshmi, W/o.Papa Rao, D/o.Kakarla Nageswara Rao, Hindu, 34 years, Housewife, R/o.D. No.3-162, Rajaka Colony, Peesapadu village, Krosuru Mandal, Guntur District,

Sattenapalli DMC., ...Petitioner

And

Dupati Papa Rao, S/o.Late Konda Swami, Hindu, 37 years, R/o.D. No.3-47, Main Road, Vatticherukuru Mandal.

Guntur District and DMC., ...Respondent

This is a petition Under Section 13 (1) (ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for dissolution of the marriage of the petitioner/wife with the respondent/husband. Petition presented on:27.01.2021Petition filed on 01.03.2021. This petition is coming on this day i.e., on 30.09.2021 before me for hearing in the presence of Sri K.N.V. Hari Babu, Advocate for the Petitioner and Respondent exparte, upon hearing and considering the material on record, having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court made doth order and decree as follows:

01.that the marriage between the petitioner and respondent dated 22.04.2004 is hereby dissolved by decree of divorce U/s.13 (1) (ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act; and

02.that there shall be no order.

Given under my hand and the seal of the Court, this the 30th day of September, 2021.

Sd/- S. Nageswara Rao,

Senior Civil Judge,

Sattenapalli. Table of Costs “No CM & FC filed on either side.”

Sd/- S. Nageswara Rao

Senior Civil Judge,

Sattenapalli. // True Copy //

Senior Civil Judge,

Sattenapalli.

H.M.O.P/44/2021

Dulipudi Vardhana Rao vs Vsnil

27 Sep 2021

In the Court of the Senior Civil Judge: Sattenapalli,

Present:-S. Nageswara Rao,

Senior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli,

Monday, this the 27th day of September, 2021,

HMOP No.44 of 2021

Between:

01. Dhulipudi Vardhana Rao, S/o.Venkateswarlu, Hindu, 34 years, R/o.D. No.2-21, Bellamvaripalem village, Pedakakani Mandal, Guntur District.

02. Chandragiri Venkata Lakshmi, W/o.Dhulipudi Vardhana Rao, D/o.Chandragiri Venkateswarlu, Hindu, 22 years, R/o.D. No.2-60/2, 75 Thalluru village, Peddakurapadu Mandal, Guntur District. …Petitioners

And

- N I L - …Respondent

This petition is coming on 27.09.2021 before me for hearing in the presence of Sri Ch. Srinivasa Rao and Sri B. Amaraiah

Naik, Advocates for the Petitioners and – N I L - Respondent, upon hearing and considering the material on record, having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court made the following:

O R D E R

This is a petition U/s.13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by the petitioners 1 and 2 who are husband and wife for dissolution of the marriage dated 22.06.2019 by mutual consent on the following grounds.

02.The marriage of the petitioners was performed on 22.06.2019 at Sri Venkateswara Swamy Temple, Tirumala-Tirupati as per Hindu rites and customs. At that time, there were serious disputes and differences arose between both the parties. Then the second petitioner went to her parental home at 75 Thalluru village and began 2 residing with them and both the petitioners began to living separately since first week of July, 2019. Thereafter several mediations was made by the elders, but there was no change in the attitude of the petitioners and they came to conclusion that it is very difficult to lead their conjugal life and lost their hope for reconciliation or renuion between them in future and they agreed to get dissolve their marriage by way of decree of divorce on the ground of mutual consent. The first petitioner agreed to pay an amount of Rs.2,75,000/- to the second petitioner towards her full and final settlement of her permanent alimony and paid Rs.1,40,000/- to the second petitioner and remaining amount will be given to the second petitioner at the time of giving her evidence. The second petitioner agreed to relinquish all her rights against the first petitioner, present and future properties of first petitioner and both parties agreed to live their personal life according to heir will and wish and not interfere with each other in any manner and there is no collusion between the petitioners in filing this petition.

03.The petitioners moved this petition on 11.02.2021. The petition was registered on 25.03.2021 and is posted to 27.09.2021 i.e., six months after the date of presentation of the petition. On 27.09.2021 both the petitioners 1 and 2 are present and they filed their chief examinations affidavit as P.Ws.1 and 2, reiterating the petition averments insisting for divorce by mutual consent and first petitioner produced Ex.P1-Marriage invitation, Ex.P2-Marriage photos (Nos.2) and also Ex.P3-True copies of Aadhaar cards of both parties.

04.Heard the counsel for petitioners.

05.The petition was presented on 11.02.2021 nearly nine months prior to to-day. So, after the motion of the parties by presenting the petition more than six months has elapsed. There is no withdrawal of the petition by the petitioners in the meanwhile. Heard both parties and they stated that there is no change in their decision for divorce on mutual consent. Hence, having regard to the petition averments and the above circumstances and as the petitioners 1 and 2 are living separately for a period of more than two years and they have not been able to live together and as they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved. I am satisfied that the marriage was solemnized between the petitioners 1 and 2 and the averments made in the petition are true.

06.In the result, the petition is allowed and the marriage between the petitioners 1 and 2 dated 22.06.2019 is hereby dissolved

U/s.13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act and there shall be a decree of divorce between the petitioners. No costs.

Pronounced by me in open Court, this the 27th day of

September, 2021.

Senior Civil Judge,

Sattenapalli. Appendix of Evidence Witnesses Examined

For Petitioners:For Respondent:

P.W.1-Dhulipudi Vardhana Rao, - None - P.W.2-Chandragiri Venkata Lakshmi.

Exhibits Marked

For Petitioners:For Respondent:

Ex.P1-Marriage Invitation, - Nil - Ex.P2-Marriage Photos (Nos.2), Ex.P3-True copies of Aadhaar card of the petitioners.

Senior Civil Judge,

Sattenapalli.

In the Court of the Senior Civil Judge: Sattenapalli,

Present:-S. Nageswara Rao,

Senior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli,

Monday, this the 27th day of September, 2021,

HMOP No.44 of 2021

Between:

01. Dhulipudi Vardhana Rao, S/o.Venkateswarlu, Hindu, 34 years, R/o.D. No.2-21, Bellamvaripalem village, Pedakakani Mandal, Guntur District and DMC.,

And

- N I L - …Respondent

This is a petition U/s.13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by the petitioners 1 and 2 who are husband and wife for dissolution of the marriage dated 22.06.2019 by mutual consent: Petition presented on:11.02.2021Petition filed on:25.03.2021

This petition is coming on 27.09.2021 before me for hearing in the presence of Sri Ch. Srinivasa Rao and Sri B. Amaraiah Naik, Advocates for the Petitioners and – N I L - Respondent, upon hearing and considering the material on record, having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court made doth order and decree as follows:

01.that the marriage between the petitioner and respondent dated 22.06.2019 is hereby dissolved by decree of divorce on mutual consent U/s.13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act; and

02.that there be no costs.

Given under my hand and the seal of the Court, this the 27th day of September, 2021.

Sd/- S. Nageswara Rao,

Senior Civil Judge,

Sattenapalli. Table of Costs “No CM & FC filed on either side.”

Sd/- S. Nageswara Rao,

// True Copy // Senior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli.

Senior Civil Judge,

Sattenapalli.

H.M.O.P/107/2019 Compromised

Induri Lakshmi Narayana Reddy vs Induri Sri Meghana

24 Sep 2021

In the Court of the Senior Civil Judge: Sattenapalli,

Present:-S. Nageswara Rao,

Senior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli,

Friday, this the 24th day of September, 2021,

HMOP No.107 of 2019

Between:

Induri Lakshmi Narayana Reddy, S/o.Koti Reddy, Hindu, 32 years, Agriculturist, R/o.D. No.1-69, Thakkellapadu

village, Phirangipuram Mandal, Guntur District. ...Petitioner

And

Induri Srimeghana, W/o.Lakshmi Narayana Reddy, D/o.Gangi Reddy, 28 years, Hindu, Housewife, R/o.D. No.9-10-11/2, Peda Maseedu Center, Guntur to Narasaraopet Road, Perecherla

village, Medikonduru Mandal, Guntur District. ...Respondent

This petition is coming on this day i.e., on 24.09.2021

before me for hearing in the presence of Sri A.V. Krishna Reddy,

Advocate for the Petitioner and of Sri B.L. Chinnaiah, Advocate for the

Respondent, upon hearing and considering the material on record, having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court made the following:

O R D E R

This is a petition Under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu

Marriage Act, 1955 for dissolution of the marriage of the petitioner/husband with the respondent/wife with the following averments.

02.The respondent is the legally wedded wife of the petitioner and their marriage was performed according to Hindu Rites and ceremonies at Kanaka Durga Devi Amaravathi Temple, Vijayawada,

Krishna District on 23.03.2016. Immediately, after the marriage the respondent joined with the petitioner at his house in Thakkellapadu 2 village of Phirangipuram Mandal. Their marriage was consummated and they lived happily married life for about one month. The respondent has no interest in agriculture, forced the petitioner to come to Perecherla village and showed hell to the petitioner. Many a times the respondent went to her parents house without informing the petitioner. The petitioner brought the respondent to his house.

Finally, on 13.01.2017 the respondent went to her parents house without the knowledge of the petitioner. The petitioner and his elders have tried to reconcile the respondent with the petitioner, but the respondent did not heed the words of them. The petitioner filed HMOP

No.89 of 2017 against the respondent on the file of this Court for divorce. During the pencency of the case, the respondent joined the petitioner and lead marital life with the petitioner and the said matter ended by dismiss as compromise arrived. But the respondent left the company of the petitioner on 30.12.2018 and went to her parents house without the knowledge of the petitioner. The petitioner made mediation through elders, but the respondent refused to it and harassed the petitioner in mental agon and deserted the petitioner at about two and half years back and since then they are living separately. Due to the attitude of the respondent, there is no hope on the respondent to lead marital life with the petitioner and no chance of reconciliation. Hence, he is constrained to file this petition for divorce.

03.Even though the counsel for respondent filed counter, submitted before this Court that the matter was compromised between the parties to the proceedings before village elders for an 3 amount of Rs.10,75,000/- to the respondent towards her full and final settlement for her permanent alimony and prayed to allow the petition and grant divorce.

04.The petitioner examined himself as P.W.1 and marked

Ex.P1. The counsel for the respondent reported no cross-examination.

Hence, cross examination recorded nil. No evidence reported for the respondent.

05.Heard arguments on both the sides.

06.Now the point for consideration is:

Whether the petitioner is entitled for dissolution of the marriage as prayed for?

07.Petitioner seeks to dissolve the marriage with the respondent on the grounds of cruelty. In this case, the petitioner as

P.W.1, reiterated the petition averments in her chief examination affidavit and produced Ex.P1. Ex.P1 is the certified copy of petition and order dated 16.11.2018 in HMOP No.89 of 2017 on the file of this

Court, showing the marriage of the petitioner with the respondent.

Since the counsel for respondent, though filed counter, stating no objection for grant of divorce and reported no cross examination, cross examination of P.W.1 is recorded nil. The unrebutted evidence of P.W.1 establishes that the respondent subjected the petitioner to cruelty.

So, on the ground of cruelty, the petitioner is entitled for dissolution of the marriage with the respondent. Accordingly, the petitioner established his case for dissolution of marriage on the ground urged 4 by him and therefore, he is entitled for decree for dissolution of marriage as prayed for.

08.In the result, petition is allowed and the marriage of the petitioner with the respondent, is dissolved by decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty U/s.13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

No costs.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and

pronounced by me in open Court, this the 24th day of September,

2021.

Senior Civil Judge,

Sattenapalli. Appendix of Evidence Witnesses Examined

For Petitioner: For Respondent:

P.W.1-Induri Lakshmi Narayana Reddy- NONE -

Exhibits Marked

For Petitioner:

Ex.P1-Certified copy of petition and order dated 16.11.2018 in HMOP No.89 of 2017 on the file of this Court.

For Respondent: - N I L -

Senior Civil Judge,

Sattenapalli.

H.M.O.P/35/2021

Maddineni Hari Prema Kumari vs Maddineni Srinivasa Rao

24 Sep 2021

In the Court of the Senior Civil Judge: Sattenapalli,

Present:-S. Nageswara Rao,

Senior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli,

Friday, this the 24th day of September, 2021,

HMOP No.35 of 2021

Between:

Maddineni Hari Prema Kumari, W/o.Srinivasa Rao, Hindu, D/o.Murukunta Srinivasa Rao, 42 years, Housewife, now R/o.D. No.1-71, Paladugu village, Medikonduru Mandal,

Guntur District. ...Petitioner

And

Maddineni Srinivasa Rao, S/o.Hanumantha Rao, 44 years, Hindu, Agriculturist, R/o.D. No.4-192, Vunguturu village,

Amaravathi Mandal, Guntur District. ...Respondent

This petition is coming on this day i.e., on 24.09.2021

before me for hearing in the presence of Sri E. Ella Reddy, Advocate

for the Petitioner and Respondent exparte, upon hearing and

considering the material on record, having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court made the following:

O R D E R

This is a petition Under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu

Marriage Act, 1956 for dissolution of the marriage of the petitioner/ wife with the respondent/husband with the following averments.

02.The petitioner is the legally wedded wife of the respondent and their marriage was solemnized on 22.08.1997 as per Hindu rites and caste custom, in the presence of village and caste elders at the petitioner’s parents house at Paladugu village of Medikonduru Mandal.

At the time of marriage, the parents of the petitioner presented

Rs.50,000/- cash and gold ring besides house hold articles to the respondent towards dowry. Immediately, after the marriage the 2 petitioner joined the respondent to lead marital life and their marriage was duly consummated, lived happily for about 12 years. In the year petitioner suffered with jaundice, the doctors advised the respondent not to make her pregnant. But the respondent made the petitioner pregnant, for which doctors removed baby. The petitioner attacked with liver problem and suffered paining with it. The respondent is habitual in playing cards and no interest to look after the welfare and health of the petitioner and along with his parents the respondent have necked out the petitioner on 25.03.2009 from his house. Having no other go, the petitioner went to her parents house. Subsequently the parents of the petitioner along with mediators went to the house of ther respondent and made mediation with him, but in vain. The petitioner filed MC No.14 of 2018 before the II Addl. Junior Civil Judge’s

Court, Sattenapalli, is pending. For all these years the parents of the petitioner looked after the welfare and health of the petitioner. The respondent deserted the petitioner on 25.03.2009, since then they are living separately. There is no hope on the respondent to lead marital life with the petitioner and no chance of reconciliation. Hence, she is constrained to file this petition for divorce.

03.Respondent remained exparte.

04.The petitioner examined herself as P.W.1 and marked

Exs.P1 to P3 on her behalf.

05.Heard arguments of the counsel for the petitioner.

06.Now the point for consideration is:

Whether the petitioner is entitled for dissolution of the marriage as prayed for?

07.Petitioner seeks to dissolve the marriage with the respondent on the ground of cruelty. In this case, the petitioner as

P.W.1, reiterated the petition averments in her chief examination affidavit and produced Exs.P1 to P3. Ex.P1 is the Wedding invitation card, Ex.P2 are marriage photos with the respondent and Ex.P3 is the

Photo copy of petition copy in Maintenance Case No.14 of 2014, showing the marriage of the petitioner with the respondent. The same reveals unrebutted that respondent remained exparte. The unrebutted evidence of petitioner as P.W.1 shows that the respondent deserted the petitioner from 25.03.2009 and are living separately since 12 years. The petition is filed on 30.01.2021 i.e., more than two years prior to the presentation of the petition and the evidence of

P.W.1 not establishes that the respondent subjected the petitioner to cruelty. Though the petition is filed U/s.13 91) (ia) of the Hindu

Marriage Act, the ingredients of the petition and the evidence of the petitioner as P.W.1 proves the desertion of the petitioner and in this case as there is no allegations of cruelty against the petitioner by the respondent. The petition averments do not disclose the ingredients that desertion of the petitioner U/s.13 91) (ib) of the Hindu Marriage

Act. So, on the ground of desertion, the petitioner is entitled for dissolution of the marriage with the respondent.

08.In the result, petition is allowed and the marriage of the petitioner with the respondent dated 22.08.1997 is dissolved by decree of divorce under section 13 (1) (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. No costs.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and

pronounced by me in open Court, this the 24th day of September,

2021.

Senior Civil Judge,

Sattenapalli. Appendix of Evidence Witnesses Examined

For Petitioner:For Respondent:

P.W.1-Maddineni Hari Prema Kumari.- Exparte -

Exhibits Marked

For Petitioner: For Respondent:

Ex.P1-Wedding invitation card, - N I L - Ex.P2-Marriage photos with the respondent, Ex.P3-Photo copy of petition copy in Maintenance Case No.14 of 2014,

Senior Civil Judge,

Sattenapalli.

EP/26/2020 Closed

Bayyavarapu Sarala vs Thondepu Kishore Kumar

27 Sep 2021

Order Record 978 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
H.M.O.P/31/2021	Dupati Naga Lakshmi vs Dupati Paparao	30 Sep 2021	Order	—
EP/26/2020	Bayyavarapu Sarala vs Thondepu Kishore Kumar	27 Sep 2021	Other	Closed
H.M.O.P/44/2021	Dulipudi Vardhana Rao vs Vsnil	27 Sep 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/35/2021	Maddineni Hari Prema Kumari vs Maddineni Srinivasa Rao	24 Sep 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/107/2019	Induri Lakshmi Narayana Reddy vs Induri Sri Meghana	24 Sep 2021	Order	Compromised
S.O.P/4/2021	Devarasetty Saroja vs Nil	24 Sep 2021	Order	—
OS/347/2016	Smt. Sadhineni Nagendramma vs Alla Hymavathi and 5 others	22 Sep 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/82/2020	Chimata Naga Vishali vs Chimata Nagaraju	20 Sep 2021	Order	—
OS/20/2016	Posani Aruna vs Alla Hymavathi	18 Sep 2021	Order	—
EP/15/2021	Paruchuri Padmavathi rep by her GPA Paruchuri Venkata Subbamma vs Vsparuchuri sivannarayana	17 Sep 2021	Other	—
H.M.O.P/78/2020	Orchu Esubabu @ Yesupadam vs Vsnil	17 Sep 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/86/2021	Garikapati Tanuja @ Sri Lakshmi Tanuja vs Garikapti Anjayya Chowdary	17 Sep 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/5/2021	Jammula Gayathri vs Jammula Baji	15 Sep 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/67/2021	Samudrala Uday Kumar@ Venkata siva naga manikanta uday kumar vs Vsnil	09 Sep 2021	Other	—
OS/148/2018	Yamparala Butchi Babu vs Chief Executive Officer, Guntur Zilla Parishat, Guntur	07 Sep 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/65/2019	Turaka John Christopher vs Turka Rachsel Kumari Dara	31 Aug 2021	Order	—
EP/42/2017	Majeti Anjaneya Sudhakara Raio vs Minnakanti Eknath Chowdary	27 Aug 2021	Other	—
H.M.O.P/38/2021	Kantu @ Siddham Thirupathamma vs Kantu Venkata Naga Malleswara Rao	17 Aug 2021	Order	—
OS/98/2015	Narne Malleswari vs Janga sambasivarao	07 Aug 2021	Order	—
OS/19/2020	Kota Anil Kumar vs Sakkurthi Amma Rao	06 Aug 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/3/2021	Yarramsetty Naga Malleswara rao vs Baggi @ Yarramsetty Ganga Bhavani	06 Aug 2021	Other	—
H.M.O.P/28/2020	Nadakudhuru Vijaya vs Nadakudhuru Gangadhara Rao	02 Aug 2021	Other	—
H.M.O.P/40/2021	Gampa @ Chevuri Srilakshmi vs Gampa Bala Krishna	02 Aug 2021	Other	—
H.M.O.P/58/2020	Eda Vinod Kumar reddy vs Vsnil	30 Jul 2021	Other	—
H.M.O.P/74/2020	Pulikonda Narendra Reddy vs Nill	30 Jul 2021	Other	—
H.M.O.P/83/2020	Mamilla Palli Revathi vs Vsnil	30 Jul 2021	Other	—
H.M.O.P/20/2021	Bandi Venkateswarlu vs Bandi @ Mannem Haritha	29 Jul 2021	Order	—
OS/237/2018	Vankayalapati Ravindranadh vs Vankayalapati Sujatha @ Rajayam and five others	27 Jul 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/2/2021	Bellamkonda Srinivasa Rao vs Bellamkonda Naga Lakshmi	23 Jul 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/22/2020	Vemulapalli Gangadhara Rao vs Athimalla Madona	23 Jul 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/29/2021	Boda @ Porlu Iswarya vs Porlu Narasimha Rao	23 Jul 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/37/2021	Davala Kiranmai vs Medara Anil Kumar	23 Jul 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/79/2020	Bhavirisetty Venkata Nageswara Rao vs Vsnill	23 Jul 2021	Order	—
EP/31/2019	Paruchuri Padmavathi vs Paruchuri Siva Narayana	22 Jul 2021	Other	—
OS/95/2017	Palparthi Raman and 1 another vs Palapathi Vasantha Rao and 4 others	19 Jul 2021	Order	—
AS/24/2018	Bhavirisetti Venkata KOteswara Rao vs Nandigama Deva DAsu	10 Jul 2021	Other	—
OS/325/2018	Nandigam Devadasu vs Bonigala Samuel John and three others	10 Jul 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/22/2021	Gumma Brahmaiah vs Gumma Sri Lakshmi @ Lakshmi	10 Jul 2021	Other	—
OS/78/2018	Muppalla Danamma vs Syed Rasool	25 Jun 2021	Order	—
EP/55/2015	Shaik Abdul Shareef vs Shaik Ramaja Begum	26 Apr 2021	Other	—
EP/6/2017	Athukuri Nageswara Rao vs Kakarla Kasi Kumari	20 Apr 2021	Other	—
H.M.O.P/17/2021	Guntupalli Jhansi @ Shaik Jhansi vs GUntupalli Hemanth Sri Gopinadh	19 Apr 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/50/2020	Alladi Narahari vs Vsnil	16 Apr 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/81/2020	Kallam Komali vs Kallam Venkatapppa Reddy	16 Apr 2021	Order	—
AS/15/2016	Kadiyala Koteswara Rao and others vs Shaik Fathima	15 Apr 2021	Judgement	—
AS/17/2016	Gandla Narasimha Rao vs Chimata Vijaya Lakshmi	15 Apr 2021	Other	—
H.M.O.P/19/2021	Uyyuri @ Vajrala Vigna Sri @ Sri vigna vs Vajrala Siva Sankar Reddy	15 Apr 2021	Order	—
EP/18/2017	Kotte China Yedukondalu vs Kotte Srinivasa Rao	12 Apr 2021	Other	—
OS/28/2019	Kalvapalli Srinivasa Reddy vs Kalvapalli Venkatravamma	30 Mar 2021	Judgement	—
AS/1/2019	Sakamuri Venkaiah vs Kotapati Rangamma	27 Mar 2021	Other	—
AS/36/2016	Thangeda Rakshana Raju @ Raju vs Veerla Venkateswarlu	26 Mar 2021	Judgement	—
EP/28/2018	Panchumarthi Koteswara Rao vs Pathan Rasheed Khan	26 Mar 2021	Other	—
EP/29/2018	Panchumarthi KOteswara Rao vs Pathan Imam Khan	26 Mar 2021	Other	—
IP/11/2020	Merugumalla Narasimha rao vs Pallepu Thirupalu	26 Mar 2021	Other	—
H.M.O.P/38/2020	Irla @ Battula Balamma vs Battula Srinivasa Rao	26 Mar 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/90/2020	Pillalamarri @ Magam Aadi Lakshmi vs Pillalamarri Venkata Koteswara Rao	26 Mar 2021	Order	—
AS/53/2016	Perupogu Jayapaul and 1 another vs Perupogu @ Bandaru Suguna and 1 another	24 Mar 2021	Judgement	—
S.O.P/1/2021	Repudi Malleswari vs Nil	23 Mar 2021	Order	—
EP/11/2018	Raja Gopal and Anjaneya Swamy Temple Rep. its manager RAngisetty Nagamalleswaera Rao vs Karnati Soda Siva Rao	19 Mar 2021	Other	—
H.M.O.P/21/2021	Vepuri @ Uppu Naveena vs Vepuri Venkateswarlu	19 Mar 2021	Other	—
AS/51/2016	VsGanta Venkayamma	16 Mar 2021	Judgement	—
EP/10/2018	Makkena Jagannadham vs Makkena Venakteswara Rao	15 Mar 2021	Order	—
OS/244/2014	Rayapati Seethamma and two others vs Rayapati Maddemma and one other	15 Mar 2021	Judgement	—
EP/4/2020	Pyneni Subba Rao vs Kandrakunta Lakshmi Kumari	12 Mar 2021	Order	—
EP/13/2020	Pyneni Subba Rao vs Kandrakunta Lakshmi Kumari	12 Mar 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/16/2020	Kalakota Sylaja vs Kalakota Baji	12 Mar 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/25/2020	Kota @ Utla Saritha vs Kota Nagarjuna	09 Mar 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/26/2020	Edara @ Kondaveeti Vani vs Edara Ankammarao	09 Mar 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/27/2020	Yadlapalli Divya vs Yadlapalli Lakshmi Kishore	09 Mar 2021	Order	—
EP/60/2015	Ms Lakshmi Srinivasa Fertilizers rep G. Sambasiv vs Patcha Parvathi and two others	08 Mar 2021	Other	—
AS/23/2018	M.Venkata Narasaiah vs Valieti Kali Prasad	05 Mar 2021	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/30/2020	Thota Rajeswari vs Thota Gangadhar Rao	05 Mar 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/84/2020	Ravikoti Sridevi vs Shaik Saleem @ Shiva	05 Mar 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/88/2020	Sure @ Tommandru Lakshmi Kumari vs Tommandru Seshagiri	05 Mar 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/89/2020	Thota @ Ratnala Subbalakshmi @ Venkata Subbalakshmi vs Ratnala Venu	05 Mar 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/93/2020	Singampalli @ Chirra Vijaya Lakshmi vs Singampalli Venkata Reddy	05 Mar 2021	Order	—
AS/8/2017	Vemula Subba Rao vs Vemula Sreeramulu and 9 othes	04 Mar 2021	Judgement	—
CMA/6/2019	Bellam Padma vs Bellam Subba Rao and 3 others	04 Mar 2021	Judgement	—
OS/5/2019	Cherukuri Prathap vs Ramisetty Venkata Lakshmi	02 Mar 2021	Order	—
OS/255/2018	INduri Brahma Reddy vs Gonuguntla Venkateswara Rao	02 Mar 2021	Order	—
EP/35/2017	Margardarsi Chit funds Pvt Ltd. vs Sri Chandana Autos.	26 Feb 2021	Other	—
H.M.O.P/20/2020	Kukatlapalli Naga Raju vs Kukatlapalli Jyothi	26 Feb 2021	Other	—
H.M.O.P/69/2020	Nandigama Suresh vs Nandigama Gayathri	26 Feb 2021	Order	—
OS/410/2014	Ravipati Sambasiva Rao vs Gottimukkala Bhaskar	25 Feb 2021	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/75/2020	Kotapati @ Malineni Nagaveni vs Malineni Mahesh	19 Feb 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/101/2019	Rangisetti Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy vs Rangisetti Basavamma	19 Feb 2021	Other	—
H.M.O.P/63/2020	Mandhadapu Venkateswarlu vs Mandhadapu Lakshmi Rani @ Ramadurgam Ester Rani	18 Feb 2021	Order	—
OS/339/2015	Mallavarapu Suresh vs Narra Rama Rao	17 Feb 2021	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/51/2020	Katragadda @ Yerragonda Triveni vs Katragadda Ankamma Rao	17 Feb 2021	Order	—
OS/224/2017	Gangadhari Saidaiah vs Yalakapati Nageswara Rao	16 Feb 2021	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/98/2019	Tadikonda @ Nagineni Sri Latha vs Tadikonda Srinivasulu @ Srinivasa Rao	16 Feb 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/45/2019	Bandaru Srinivasa Rao @ Vasu vs Bandaru @ Savva Laxmi @ Venkata Narasamma	12 Feb 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/86/2020	Kasimsetty Siva Parvathi @ Lakshmi Siva Parvathi vs Kasimsetty Thirapathiswamy	12 Feb 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/96/2019	Ravipudi Sireesha vs Muthukuri Sambasiva Rao	12 Feb 2021	Other	—
EP/9/2019	Shri Ram Chits Pvt. Ltd., Sattenapalli vs Sarikonda Sri Rajya Lakshmi DAtta	11 Feb 2021	Other	—
H.M.O.P/31/2019	Banavath Tulasi vs Banavath Krishna Naik	11 Feb 2021	Other	—
AS/23/2016	Rupavath Ghamsi Bahi vs Shaik Khasim Syda @ Syda died	10 Feb 2021	Judgement	—
OS/269/2018	Indian Overseas Bank, Lemalle Branch, rep. by its Branch Manager vs Chinnam Mogaleswara Rao and 3 others	10 Feb 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/21/2019	Podili Harthia vs Podoli Siva Sankara Rao	08 Feb 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/70/2020	Pamidipula Anil Kumar vs Pamidipula Nagalakshmi	08 Feb 2021	Order	—

Showing 100 of 978 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Sep 2021		15
Aug 2021		8
Jul 2021		15
Jun 2021		1
Apr 2021		10
Mar 2021		32
Feb 2021		27
Jan 2021		17
Dec 2020		26
Nov 2020		29
Oct 2020		22
Sep 2020		24

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Sri S. Nageswara Rao handled?

Sri S. Nageswara Rao has handled 1014 court orders since 2019 at II Addl JCJ Court, Sattenapalli. The average disposal rate is 31 orders per month.

What types of cases does Sri S. Nageswara Rao hear?

Based on available records, Sri S. Nageswara Rao primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Sessions Cases) at II Addl JCJ Court, Sattenapalli.

Where is Sri S. Nageswara Rao currently posted?

Sri S. Nageswara Rao is posted as Senior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli at II Addl JCJ Court, Sattenapalli, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Sri S. Nageswara Rao available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Sri S. Nageswara Rao are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Sri S. Nageswara Rao dispose cases?

Sri S. Nageswara Rao disposes approximately 31 cases per month, based on 1014 orders handled over their tenure at II Addl JCJ Court, Sattenapalli.

Since when is Sri S. Nageswara Rao serving?

Sri S. Nageswara Rao has been serving at II Addl JCJ Court, Sattenapalli since 2019.

Case Types

OS 42%

H 25%

EP 16%

AS 7%

IP 4%

CMA 3%

SC 3%

L 1%

Posting History

Jan 2019 — Sep 2021

Senior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli · 1,014 orders

Outcomes on Record

Closed 1

Compromised 1

Other Judges at this Court

Vijay Kumar Reddy

Senior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli

416 orders

Sri J.Sujin Kumar

II Addl. Junior Civil Judge

457 orders

← View all judges at II Addl JCJ Court, Sattenapalli