Sri Subhash Chandra Bose

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

Court of Junior Civil Judge,, Palamaner (Taluka) · Chittoor · Andhra Pradesh

Sri SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE, JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, is posted at Court of Junior Civil Judge,, Palamaner (Taluka), Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh, India. 251 court orders on record since 2011. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, CC, STC cases.

251

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

CC/127/2013 Acquitted

SHO Gangavaram PS vs K.Krishan

07 Apr 2014

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS, PALAMANER

Present: Sri Subhash Chandra Bose, B.A,LL.B.,

Judicial Magistrate of I class, Palamner.

DATED THE SEVENTH (7TH) DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND FOURTEEN

CC NO: 127 of 2013 Between:

The State rep. By the Inspector of Police, Gangavaram Circle . (Crime No. 13/2013 of Baireddipalle P.S.) …… COMPLAINANT. And:

1. K. Krishna, aged 27 years, S/o Kannan, Nayanacheruvu village, Natrampalli post, Thirupathuru taluk, Vellore district, Tamilnadu state. (Case against A1 was split up and numbered as C.C.8/2014)

2. M. Muniraja, aged 32 years, S/o Murthy, Puthukoil village, Vaniambadi taluk, Vellore district, Tamilnadu state.

3. M. Radhakrishna, aged 28 years, S/o Manikyam veeramushna palli village, Thirupathur taluk, Vellore district, Tamilnadu state.

…… ACCUSED.

This case is coming on 01.04.2014 for final hearing before me in the presence of Assistant Public Prosecutor for the complainant and of Sir.B. Ashok Kumar, Counsel for A2 and Sri.G.Krishnamurthy, Legal Aid Counsel for A3 and having stood for consideration till this day, this court deliver the following :-

J U D G M E N T

The accused are tried before this court for the offence punishable u/sec. 457, 380 and 411 of IPC concerned in Cr.NO: 13 of 2013 of

Baireddipalle Police station.

02. The facts of the prosecution case in brief are as follows:-

On 22/23-02-2013 night at Gandla street, Lakkanapalli village,

Baireddipalli mandal, some unknown offenders gained ingress into the house of L.W.1, the compainant J. Murali @ Mohan settee by broke opening the lock of the grill door and main door during the absence of the inmates, opened the iron safe with the original keys available in house and committed theft of a pair of gold ear studs with stones, two pair of gold jumkies, 2 pairs of gold 2 ear studs, gold ears ornaments sets, four gold bangles, two gold minor chains, three gold bracelets, silver utensils weighing 500 grams all worth

Rs.1,30,000/-.

Upon the complaint of L.W.1/J. Murali @ J. Moahn setty a case in crime No.13/2013 for the offence punishable U/Sec 457, 380 of IPC of

Baireddypalli police station was registered and investigated into. During the investigation, L.W.13/C.Chandrasekhar examined L.Ws.1 to 7 i.e., J. Murali, D.

Kasthuri, J. Babu, J. Latha, P. Rama Mohan chetty, K. Narasimhulu, M. Hari and recorded their statements and examined the scene of offence and prepared the observation Mahazar duly signed by the mediators and prepared a a rough sketch of the scene of offence.

During the course of investigation , on credible information on 7.5.2013 at about 8.15 a.m., at fly over bridge, Krishnagiri road, Kuppam town, L.W.13/C.Chandrasekhar arrested the accused 1 to 3 in the presence of mediators L.W.10K. Hanumantha Rao, L.W.11 C.Ramanarayana and seized a pair of gold ear studs studded with stones, weighing about 4.900 grams, two pairs of gold jumkies, weighing about 6.94 grams, four gold rings weighing about 10.69 grams, old gold minor chain weighing about 7.9 grams, one gold minor chain weighing about 4.40 grams, a pair of gold bangles weighing about 8.5 grams, silver plate weighing 183.800 grams all worth Rs.92,000/- from their possession under the cover of Mahazar . During the interrogation,

A1 to A3 confessed the commission of offence, sold away the remaining properties and spent the amount for their vices. After completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed against the accused for the offence punishable U/Sec. 457, 380 of IPC.

03. On perusal of the case papers filed along with charge sheet, this

Court took cognizance for the offence punishable under section.457, 380 of

IPC.

04. On appearance of the accused, copies of case papers as contemplated under section 207 of Cr.P.C., were furnished.

05. The accused were examined U/Sec. 239 of Cr.P.C and charge for the offences punishable U/Sec. 457, 380 and 411 of IPC were framed and 3 the same were read over and explained to the accused in a language known to them for which accused pleaded not guilty and claims to be tried.

06. Prosecution in order to prove its case examined P.W.1 : J.Murali ,

P.W.2 : D.Kasthuri, P.W.3 : C.Ramanarayana, PW.4 : D.Muniswami, P.W.5 : C.

Chandrasekhar and got marked Ex.P1 : Report given by P.W.1, Ex.P2 : Scene observation Mahazar dated.23.2.2013 at 1.00 p.m. , Ex.P3 : Seizure Mahazar dated.7.5.2013 at 8.15 a.m, Ex.P4: Identification Mahazar dated.9.5.2013,

Ex.P5 : F.I.R., Ex.P6 : Rough sketch and M.O.1 : Four Gold rings, M.O.2 : Two gold bangles, M.O.3 : Two gold chains, M.O.4 : One pair of ear studs studded with stones, M.O.5 : Two pairs of gold jumkees , M.O.6: One silver plate ,

M.O.7 : Three locks, M.O.8 : Two empty plastic boxes.

07. After closing of prosecution side evidence accused were examined

U/Sec.313 Cr.P.C by explaining the incriminating material found in the evidence of prosecution witnesses.

08. The plea of the accused is total denial of the truthness of the evidence of prosecution witnesses and reported no defence evidence.

09. Heard both sides. Perused the oral and documentary evidence on record.

10. The following point is raised for determination :-

Whether prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed an offence punishable U/Sec. 457, 380 and 411 of IPC ?

11. Above point is answered as herein below for the following // REASONS //

POINT :

P.W.1/J. Murali deposed that on 23.2.2013 he along with his wife

L.W.2 /D.Kathuri went to poultry form by locking the dokors of his hokuse.

Then he returned and found missing of one pair of gold ear stud two pair of gold jumkies and one pair of gold ear studs two pairs of plain ear studs, three gold bracelets, three gold chains , four gold bangles , four gold rings , one silver plate, four silver glasses one silver spoon. Then he lodged a report with

SHO, Baireddipalle police station under Ex.P1. On 9.4.2013 he identified

M.O.1 to 6 .

4 in his cross examination he admitted that he did not produce3 any purchase bills of M.Os.1 to 6 and description of missing property was not mntioned in

Ex.P1.

12. P.W.2 D. Kasthuri deposed that on 22.2.2013 during the night time theft took plce in her house on the next day morning she noticed about the found missing of M.Os.1 to 6 and she identified M.Os.1 to 6 in Test

Identification parade .

13. P.W.3/Ramanarayana /VRO deposed that on 23.2.2013 he accompanied L.W.13/Chandrasekhar to the house of P.W.1 where L.W.13 observed the scene of offence prepared the observation Mahazar of the scene of offence /Ex.P2. Again on 7.5.2013 he accompanied L.W.13 to the kuppam where L.W.13 found A1, A2 and A3 arrested them. On enquiry A1 to

A3 found in possession of stolen gold ornaments. Even A1 to A3 also confessed that they committed the theft in the villages of Baireddipalle mandal and V.Kota Mandal Rayalapeta in the villages of Bangarupalem and

Palamner mandal. On interrogation A1 was found in possession of one pair of

Junkies of one single jumki. A3 was found in possession of four gold rings one gold minor chains and A2 was found in possession of one single gold jumkies, minor gold chain and silver plate. L.W.13 Chandrasekar seized the said properties under the cover of seizure and arrest Mahazar/Ex.P3. On 9.5.0213 he secured the presence of P.W.1 and conducted Test identification of M.Os.1 to 6 and he prepared the Test identification parade to that effect under Ex.P.4

In his cross examination he admitted that Ex.P4/Test identification Mahazar of M.Os.1 to 6 was scribed on 9.4.2013 and

Ex.P3/Seizure Mahazar M.Os.1 to 6 was scribed on 7.5.2013.

14. P.W.4/D.Muniswamy/S.I of Police/Investigation officer deposed that on 23.2.2013 basing on the report/Ex.P1 he registered a case in crime No.13/13 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 454, 380 IPC and FIR/Ex.P2 was sent to the court and further investigation was done by 5

L.W.13/Chandrasekhar. On 7.5.2013 L.W.13 Chandrasekar arrested A1 to A3 and recovered the property relating to this crime and property relating to the crimes of other police station. L.W.13 recovered one pair of gold ear studs, two pair of gold jumkies and one pair of gold bangles fro the possession of A1 concerned to this crime and for gold rings and one gold minor chain from the possession of A2 concerned to this crime and one gold minor chain and one silver plate from the possession of A3 concerned to this crime under the cover of Ex.p3/seizure and arrest Mahazar.

In his cross examination he denied the suggestion that entire investigation is table investigation.

15. P.W.5/Chandrasekhar who is the investigation officer deposed that during the course of investigation on 7.5.2013 at 6.15 a.m., on information he collected staff and mediators and reached to the fly over kuppam town in a two jeeps at 8.15 a.m., he found A1 an A3 on suspicious , he interrogated A1 to A3 and he recovered M.Os.2, M.O.4 and M.O.5 from the possession of A1 and M.Os.1 and M.O.3 from the possession of A2 and he also recovered one minor gold chain which is a part of M.O.3 and also recovered

M.O.6 from the possession of A3 under the cover of seizure and arrest

Mahazar/Ex.p3. He sent the above said seized property L.W.8

C.Ramanarayana conducted Test identification parade who conducted identification parade under Ex.P4 and issued proceedings accordingly.

In his cross examination he admitted that caused to conduct

Test identification parade of seized property on 9.4.2013 under Ex.p4.

16. On careful scrutiny of the oral and documentary evidence on record admittedly none of the witnesses witnessed the accused while committing the theft oft M.Os.1 to 6 in the house of the defacto complainant .

So absolutely there is no evidence on record to attract the offence punishable

U/Sec. 457, 380 of IPC. When come to the evidence with regard to the recovery of M.Os.1 to 6 from the possession of accused .

P.W.5/Chandrasekhar , Investigation officer P.W.3/C.Ramanarayana /VRO both are specifically admitted that Ex.P4 Test identification Mahazar of

M.Os.1 to 6 was scribed on 9.4.2013. i.e., much prior to the recovery of

M.Os.1 to 6.

17. As per the Ex.P3 seizure and arrest Mahazar and as per the evidence of P.W.4 and P.W.5/Investigation officer M.Os.1 to 6 we4re recovered on 7.5.2013 from the possession of accused, as discussed supra admittedly Test identification parade of M.Os.1 to 6 was conducted almost one month prior to its recovery i.e., on 9.4.2013 under Ex.P4 Said oral and documentary evidence clearly indicates it is an improper investigation and

M.Os.1 to 6 are planted and crated only for case purpose and evidence on record clearly sows that it is very worst kind of investigation.

18. When Test identification parade of M.Os.1 to 6 were conducted under Ex.P4 on 9.4.2013 itself the question of recovery of M.Os.1 to 6 under Ex.P3 on 7.5.2013 does not arise which shows recovery is very doubtful and not free from suspicious .

19. In view of the foregoing reasons, I have no hesitation to hold that prosecution failed to bring home the guilt of the accused for the offence punishable U/Sec. 457, 380 and 411 of IPC..

20. In the result, A2 and A3 are found not guilty for the offence punishable U/Sec. 457, 380 and 411 of IPC. Consequently, A2 and A3 are acquitted U/Sec. 248(1) Cr.P.C., for the said offences. A2 and A3 shall be released forthwith if they are not required in any other case. M.Os.1 to 6 shall be handed over to P.W.1 after expiry of appeal time. M.Os.7 & 8 being the worthless case property shall be destroyed after appeal time.

Typed to my dictation by the personal Assistant, corrected and

pronounced by me in Open Court on this the 7th day of April , 2014.

Sd/ Subhash Chandra Bose, B.A,LL.B.,

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESS EXAMINED FOR

PROSECUTION DEFENCE: -NIL- P.W.1 : J.Murali

P.W.2 : D.Kasthuri,

P.W.3 : C.Ramanarayana,

PW.4 : D.Muniswami,

P.W.5 : C. Chandrasekhar

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

PROSECUTION

Ex.P1 : Report given by P.W.1,

Ex.P2 : Scene observation Mahazar dated.23.2.2013 at 1.00 p.m.

Ex.P3 : Seizure Mahazar dated.7.5.2013 at 8.15 a.m,

Ex.P4: Identification Mahazar dated.9.5.2013,

Ex.P5 : F.I.R.,

Ex.P6 : Rough sketch

DEFENCE: NIL

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

M.O.1 : Four Gold rings, M.O.2 : Two gold bangles, M.O.3 : Two gold chains, M.O.4 : One pair of ear studs studded with stones, M.O.5 : Two pairs of gold jumkees M.O.6: One silver plate M.O.7 : Three locks, M.O.8 : Two empty plastic boxes.

Sd/ Subhash Chandra Bose, B.A,LL.B.,

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

// True copy //

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF ICLASS,PALAMNER

Calendar in CC NO: 127 of 2013

Date of occurrence::22/23-02-2013 Date of complaint::23-02-2013 Date of taken on file::10.06.2013 Date of commencement of trial::10.07.2013 Date of closure of trial::01.04.2014 Date of sentence or order::07.04.2014

Name of the Complainant::The State rep. By the Inspector of Police, Gangavaram Circle. (Crime No. 13/2013 of Baireddipalle P.S.)

Name of the accusedFather's / Husband's nameAge

1. K. Krishna (Case against A1 S/o Kannan,27 years was split up and numbered as C.C.8/2014)S/o Murthy, 32 years

2. M. Muniraja,

3. M. Radhakrishna,S/o Manikyam28 years

VillageMandalReligionCalling A1 R/o Nayanacheruvu Tamilnadu state.All are Not known village, Natrampalli post,Hindus Thirupathuru taluk, Vellore district,

A2 R/o Puthukoil village, A2 and A3 are Vaniambadi taluk, Vellore district, Tamilnadu state. A3 R/o Veeramushna palli village, Thirupathur taluk

Nature of offence :U/Sec. 457, 380 and 411 of IPC

Finding of the Court :Found not guilty

Sentence or Order : In the result, A2 and A3 are found not guilty for the offence punishable U/Sec. 457, 380 and 411 of IPC. Consequently, A2 and A3 are acquitted U/Sec. 248(1) Cr.P.C., for the said offences. A2 and A3 shall be released forthwith if they are not required in any other case. M.Os.1 to 6 shall be handed over to P.W.1 after expiry of appeal time. M.Os.7 & 8 being the worthless case property shall be destroyed after appeal time. Sd/ Subhash Chandra Bose, B.A,LL.B.,

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

// True copy //

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

9 // True copy //

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

Sd/ Subhash Chandra Bose, B.A,LL.B.,

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

// True copy //

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

Sd/ Subhash Chandra Bose, B.A,LL.B.,

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

// True copy //

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

CC/128/2013 Acquitted

S.H.O Baireddipalle P.S. vs K.Krishna

07 Apr 2014

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS, PALAMANER

Present: Sri Subhash Chandra Bose, B.A,LL.B.,

Judicial Magistrate of I class, Palamner.

DATED THE SEVENTH (7TH) DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND FOURTEEN

CC NO: 128 of 2013 Between:

The State rep. By the Inspector of Police, Baireddipalle Police station (Crime No. 5/2013 of Baireddipalle P.S.) …… COMPLAINANT. And:

1. K. Krishna, aged 27 years, S/o Kannan, Nayanacheruvu village, Natrampalli post, Thirupathuru taluk, Vellore district, Tamilnadu state. (Case against A1 was split up and numbered as C.C.9/2014)

2. M. Muniraja, aged 32 years, S/o Murthy, Puthukoil village, Vaniambadi taluk, Vellore district, Tamilnadu state.

3. M. Radhakrishna, aged 28 years, S/o Manikyam veeramushna palli village, Thirupathur taluk, Vellore district, Tamilnadu state.

…… ACCUSED.

This case is coming on 01.04.2014 for final hearing before me in the presence of Assistant Public Prosecutor for the complainant and of Sri.B. Ashok Kumar,and Sri.Syed Ismail, Counsel for the accused and having stood for consideration till this day, this court deliver the following :-

J U D G M E N T

The accused are tried before this court for the offence punishable u/sec. 457, 380 and 411 of IPC concerned in Cr.NO: 05 of 2013 of

Baireddipalle Police station.

02. The facts of the prosecution case in brief are as follows:-

On 24.01.2013 at at S.C. Colony, Baireddypalli village and Mandal wherein some unknown offenders gained ingress into the house of L.W.1/S.

Fazululla by broke open the lock of the main door and committed theft of a pair of gold hangings weighing 6 grams, a pair of silver leg chains weighing 250 grams, 50 sarees, cash of Rs.6,000/- all worth Rs.15,000/- . Upon the complaint of L.W.1/S.Fazululla a case in crime No.5/2013 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 457 and 380 of IPC was registered and investigated into.

During the course of investigation, L.W.8/D.Muniswami examined L.Ws.,1 to 4 viz., S. Fazululla, S.Shabeena, S. Irfan, G.Murugamma and recorded their statements and examined the scene of offence and prepared the rough sketch of the scene of offence.

During the course of investigation, on credible information , on 07.05.2013 at 8.15 a.m., at fly over bridge, Krishnagiri road, Kuppam town, L.W.8/D.Muniswami arrested A1 to A3 in the presence of mediators

L.Ws.5.K. Hanumantha Rao, and L.W.6/C. Ramanarayana and seized a pair of gold jumkies wg.3 grams from the possession of A1 and a pair of gold jumkies wg.3 grams from the possession of A3, all worth Rs.10,000/- uner the cover of

Mahzar in the presence of mediators. During the interrogation accused confessed the commission of ofence, sold away the remaining properties to unknown persons and spent the amount for their vices. After completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed against the accused for the offence punishable U/Sec. 457, 380 of IPC.

03. On perusal of the case papers filed along with charge sheet, this

Court took cognizance for the offence punishable under section.457, 380 of

IPC.

04. On appearance of the accused, copies of case papers as contemplated under section 207 of Cr.P.C., were furnished.

05. The accused were examined U/Sec. 239 of Cr.P.C and charge for the offences punishable U/Sec. 457, 380 and 411 of IPC were framed and the same were read over and explained to the accused in a language known to them for which accused pleaded not guilty and claims to be tried.

06. Prosecution in order to prove its case examined P.W.1 :S.

Fuzululla , P.W.2 : C. Ramanarayana P.W.3 : D. Muniswami, PW.4 : C.

Chandrasekhar and got marked Ex.P1 : Report given by P.W.1, Ex.P2 : Copy of seizure and arrest Mahazar dated.07.05.2013 at 8.15 a.m, Ex.P3 :

Identification Mahazar, Ex.P4: F.I.R., Ex.P5 : Rough sketch and M.O.1 : One pair of gold zimkies.

07. After closing of prosecution side evidence accused were examined

U/Sec.313 Cr.P.C by explaining the incriminating material found in the evidence of prosecution witnesses.

08. The plea of the accused is total denial of the truthness of the evidence of prosecution witnesses and reported no defence evidence.

09. Heard both sides. Perused the oral and documentary evidence on record.

10. The following point is raised for determination :-

Whether prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed an offence punishable U/Sec. 457, 380 AND 411 OF IPC ?

11. Above point is answered as herein below for the following // REASONS //

POINT :

P.w.1/Faizullah has deposed that on 25.1.2013 he noticed that lock of the grill gate and lock of the main door of the house broke open and inside the house he found missing of sum of Rs.6,000/- one pair of gold jumky and one pair of silver leg chains and 50 sarees . Then he lodged a report under

Ex.P1. Then he participated in the test identification parade conducted by

L.W.6/Ramanarayana on 9.4.2013 and he identified one pair of gold jumki/M.O.1.

12. P.w.2//Ramanarayana, VRO deposed that on 23.2.2013 he accompanied L.W.13/Chandrasekhar to the house of P.W.1 on 7.5.2013 again he accompanied L.W.13/Chandrasekhar to the kuppam in a police jeep and

L.W.13 while conducting vehicular check L.W.13 found A1 to A3 on suspicious

L.W.13 interrogated A1 and A1 was found in possession of one pair of Jumkies and one single jumki and A3 was found in possession of four gold rings and one gold minor chain and A2 was found in possession of single gold jumky, minor gold chain and silver plate . L.W.13 Chandrasekhar arrested A1 to A3 and seized the said property under the cover of seizure and arrest

Mahazar/Ex.p2. Then L.W.13 sent the gold ornaments to him on 9.5.2013 to conduct Test identification parade of the said gold ornaments. Then he 4 secured presence of P.W.1 and p.w.1 identified M.O.1 . Then P.W.1 prepared

Test identification parade to that effect under Ex.P3.

In his cross examination he admitted that Ex.P4 was scribed on 9.4.2013 and Ex.P3 was scribed on 7.5.2013.

13. P.w.3.D. Muniswamy deposed that on 25.1.2013 basing on the report of P.,W.1 he registered a case in crime No.5/2013 for the offences punishable U/Sec. 457, 380 of IPC and submitted original FIR to the court under Ex.P4. Then he examined L.Ws.1 and 2 and recorded their statements in the police station and visited the scene of offence prepared the rough sketch of the scene of offence under Ex.P5. At the scene of fence he examined L.W.3/Irfan and L.W.4G.Murugamma and recorded their statements. On 7.5.2013 he accompanied L.W.7/Chandrasekar and other persons to the fly over in the Kuppam and the said Chandrasekhar found A1 to A3 came on two wheelers. On interrogation one gol jumki was recovered from the possession of A1. Another gold jumki was recovered from the possession of A3. Apart from the case property relating to other crimes in the presence of mediators namely K. Hanumantha Rao/L.W.5 and C.

Ramanarayana/P.W.2 under the cover of seizure and arrest Mahazar/Ex.P2.

He also caused to conduct Test identification parade of M.O.1 one pair of jumkies in the presence of C.Ramanarayana.

14. C. Chandrasekhar/P.W.4 who is an Investigation officer deposed that on 7.5.2013 he found A1 to A3 near by fly over Kuppam town.

He also recovered one M.O.1/one jumki each from the possession of A1 and

A3 and other properties relating to other cases from the possession of A1 to

A3 under the cover of Ex.P2/Seizure and arrest Mahazar.

In his cross examination he admitted that he caused to conduct

Test identification parade of seized property on 9.4.2013 under Ex.P3.

15. On careful scrutiny of the oral and documentary evidence on record absolutely none of the witnesses deposed that they witnessed the accused while committing the theft of M.O.1 in the house of defacto 5 complainant. Absolutely there is no evidence on record to show that accused committed an offence punishable U/Sec. 457, 380 IPC. When come to the recovery of M.O.1 from the possession of accused as deposed by the

P.W.1/defacto complainant , P.W.4/Chandrasekar/investigation officer and

P.W.2/Ramanaraana test identification parade of M.O.1 on 9.4.2013 under

Ex.P3 Test identification Mahazar of M.O.1 in the . When the Test identification Mahazar of M.O.1 was conducted on 9.4.2013 itself as discussed above the recovery of M.O.1 from the possession of accused on 7.5.2013 as deposed by P.W.2, P.W.3 and P.W.4 does not arise which shows recovery of M.O.1 from the possession of accused under Ex.P2 is doubtful and not free from suspicious.

19. In view of the foregoing reasons, I have no hesitation to hold that prosecution failed to bring home the guilt of the accused for the offence punishable U/Sec. 457, 380 and 411 of IPC..

20. In the result, A2 and A3 are found not guilty for the offence punishable U/Sec. 457, 380 and 411 of IPC. Consequently, A2 and A3 are acquitted U/Sec. 248(1) Cr.P.C., for the said offences. A2 and A3 shall be released forthwith if they are not required in any other case. M.O.1 one pair of gold jumkies shall be handed over to P.W.1 after appeal time. The unmarked, non valuable, worthless case property if any shall be destroyed after appeal time.

Typed to my dictation by the personal Assistant, corrected and

pronounced by me in Open Court on this the 7th day of April , 2014.

Sd/ Subhash Chandra Bose, B.A,LL.B.,

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESS EXAMINED FOR

PROSECUTION DEFENCE: -NIL- P.W.1 :S. Fuzululla ,

P.W.2 : C. Ramanarayana

P.W.3 : D. Muniswami,

PW.4 : C. Chandrasekhar 6

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

PROSECUTION

Ex.P1 : Report given by P.W.1,

Ex.P2 : Copy of seizure and arrest Mahazar dated.07.05.2013 at 8.15 a.m,

Ex.P3 : Identification Mahazar,

Ex.P4: F.I.R.,

Ex.P5 : Rough sketch

DEFENCE: NIL

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

M.O.1 : One pair of gold zimkies.

Sd/ Subhash Chandra Bose, B.A,LL.B.,

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

// True copy //

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF ICLASS,PALAMNER

Calendar in CC NO: 128 of 2013

Date of occurrence::24.01.2013 Date of complaint::25.01.2013 Date of taken on file::10.06.2013 Date of commencement of trial::10.07.2013 Date of closure of trial::01.04.2014 Date of sentence or order::07.04.2014

Name of the Complainant::The State rep. By the Inspector of Police, Baireddipalle Police station (Crime No. 5/2013 of Baireddipalle P.S.)

Name of the accusedFather's / Husband's nameAge

1. K. Krishna (Case against A1 S/o Kannan,27 years was split up and numbered as C.C.9/2014)S/o Murthy, 32 years

2. M. Muniraja,

3. M. Radhakrishna,S/o Manikyam28 years

VillageMandalReligionCalling A1 R/o Nayanacheruvu Tamilnadu state.All are Not known village, Natrampalli post,Hindus Thirupathuru taluk, Vellore district,

A2 R/o Puthukoil village, A2 and A3 are Vaniambadi taluk, Vellore district, Tamilnadu state. A3 R/o Veeramushna palli village, Thirupathur taluk Nature of offence :U/Sec. 457, 380 and 411 of IPC. Finding of the Court :Found not guilty Sentence or Order : In the result, A2 and A3 are found not guilty for the offence punishable U/Sec. 457, 380 and 411 of IPC. Consequently, A2 and A3 are acquitted U/Sec. 248(1) Cr.P.C., for the said offences. A2 and A3 shall be released forthwith if they are not required in any other case. M.O.1 one pair of gold jumkies shall be handed over to P.W.1 after appeal time. The unmarked, non valuable, worthless case property if any shall be destroyed after appeal time.

Sd/ Subhash Chandra Bose, B.A,LL.B.,

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

// True copy //

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

8 // True copy //

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

Sd/ Subhash Chandra Bose, B.A,LL.B.,

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

// True copy //

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

Sd/ Subhash Chandra Bose, B.A,LL.B.,

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

// True copy //

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

CC/52/2010 Acquitted

SHO Gangavaram P.S vs V.Reddeppa

07 Apr 2014

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS, PALAMANER

Present: Sri Subhash Chandra Bose, B.A,LL.B.,

Judicial Magistrate of I class, Palamner.

DATED THE FOURTH (4TH) DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND FOURTEEN

CC NO: 52 of 2010 Between:

The State rep. By the Inspector of Police, Gangavaram Circle . (Crime No. 20/2010 of Gangavaram P.S.) …… COMPLAINANT. And:

1. Veluru Reddeppa, aged 45 years, S/o late Venkatappa.

2. Chenula Mani, aged 35 years, S/o Chenula Venkatramappa.

3. Nuberu Venkatramappa, aged 50 years, S/o late Narappa.

4. Tenkayala Narayanaswamy, aged 40 years, S/o Munivenkatappa.

5. Veluru Seenappa, aged 35 years, S/o late Venkatappa

6. Veluru Maneppa, aged 48 years, S/o late V. Gurrappa.

7. Veluru Venkatesappa, aged 50 years, S/o late Venkatappa.

8. V. Subbanna, aged 40 years, S/o Gurrappa.

9. Ayyavaru Subramanyam, aged 35 yars, S/o late Nanjappa.

10. Kanchala ugini Mahesh, aged 25 years, S/o K. Gattappa.

11. Nallanolla Daasappa, aged 36 years, S/o Chinnavenkatappa.

12. Varadappa, aged 38 years, S/o Gurrappa.

13. Veluru Mani, aged 27 years, S/o V. Krishnappa.

14. Hanumanolla Sudhakar, aged 25 years, S/o Thirumalappa.

15. Upparapalle Gownula Munaswamy, aged 32 years, S/o Krishnappa.

A1 to A3, A5 to A15 residents of Betanuru village, Karnataka state.

…… ACCUSED.

This case is coming on 04.04.2014 for final hearing before me in the presence of Assistant Public Prosecutor for the complainant and of Sri. K. Lakshmipathy, Advocate for the accused and having stood for consideration till this day, this court deliver the following :-

J U D G M E N T

The accused are tried before this court for the offences punishable u/sec. 148, 324, 452, 427 and 506 of IPC concerned in Cr.NO: 20 of 2010 of

Gangavaram Police station.

02. The facts of the prosecution case in brief are as follows:- on 16.2.2010 at about 6.30 p.m., the followers of L.W.1/Madi

Gattappa picked up the Galata with one Pujari Venkatappa, subsequently A1 to A15 along with some unidentified offenders under the guise that

L.W.1/Maadi G.Gattappa lead his followers in causing galata with the said pujari in the limits of Karnataka state attacked L.W.1/ Maadi G.Gattappa and

L.W.2/M.G. Chandramma. On the same day at about 8.00 p.m., A1 to A15 along with some other unidentified offenders armed with sticks , bricks and the stones trespassed the house of L.W.1/ Maadi G.Gattappa and L.W.2/M.G.

Chandramma. . while A1 to A15 armed with weapons were proceeding to the house ofL.W.1/ Maadi G.Gattappa and L.W.2/M.G. Chandramma. and

L.W.5/Boordimitta Subramani witnessed them and requested them not to proceed further and that the matter will be settled on the next day morning in the presence of elders inspite of the request of L.W.5. A1 to A15 long with some other unidentified offender with their common object to cause hurt to

L.W.1/ Maadi G.Gattappa and L.W.2/M.G. Chandramma. and to cause damage to the property of L.W.1/ Maadi G.Gattappa and L.W.2/M.G. Chandramma.

trespassed the house of L.W.1/ Maadi G.Gattappa and L.W.2/M.G.

Chandramma.by raising hues and cries, some other unidentified offenders were waiting outside of house of the L.W.1/ Maadi G.Gattappa and L.W.2/M.G.

Chandramma.. On seeing the accused armed with weapons L.Ws.1 and 2 closed the doors of their house, but the accused in furtherance of their common object broke open the door of the house of L.Ws.1 and 2 pushed them to the ground and fisted with their hands on their knees an at their back and caused injuries. The accused damaged the iron beeruva, when the accuse tried to tie L.W.1/ Maadi G.Gattappa with ropes L.W.2 went in to the kitchen room and came with red chilly powder to sprinkle in the eyes of the accused. On seeding L.W.2/M.G. Chandramma. with red chilly powder, the accused 1 to 15 along with some unidentified offenders left the house of

L.W.1/ Maadi G.Gattappa and L.W.2/M.G. Chandramma. on seeing the A1 to

A15 along with some other unidentified offenders armed with weapons.

L.W.3/Madi Suguna who was present along with her children in the house 3 closed the door and hide in the agriculture fields situated besides their house due to fear. The accused threw stones on the house of L.W.3/Suguna.

On 17.2.2010 at about 10.30 a.m., L.W.11/T.Ch.Govindu recorded the signed statement of L.W.1/Gattappa at area hospital, Palamaner. Basing on signed said statement L.W.11 registered the case as in crime No.20/2010 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 147, 148, 427, 452, 324, 506 r/w 149 IPC and investigated into. During the course of investigation L.W.11 examined and recorded the statements of L.Ws.1 to 7viz., L.W.1/ Maadi G.Gattappa ,

L.W.2/M.G. Chandramma, L.W.3/Madi Suguna, L.W.4 Ravuri Gattamma,

Boordimitta Subramani, Gurrappagari Muneppa, Narayanappagari Anji visited the scene of offence and sized the crime weapons under cover of

Mahazarnama dated.17.2.2010 in the prsence of L.W.8/B. Chengappa and

L.W.9/Subbanna. On 3.3.2010 A1 and A8 were surrendered before the

Hon'ble Court. On 9.3.2010 he arrested the accused and after completion of

investigation, charge sheet was filed against the accused for the offence punishable U/Sec. 147, 148, 427, 452, 324, 506 r/w 149 IPC.

03. On perusal of the case papers filed along with charge sheet, this

Court took cognizance for the offence punishable under section. 147, 148, 427, 452, 324, 506 r/w 149 IPC.

04. On appearance of the accused, copies of case papers as contemplated under section 207 of Cr.P.C., were furnished.

05. The accused 1 to 15 are examined U/Sec. 239 of Cr.P.C and charge for the offences punishable U/Sec. 148, 324, 452, 427, 506 of IPC were framed and the same were read over and explained to the accused in a language known to them for which accused pleaded not guilty and claims to be tried.

06. Prosecution in order to prove its case examined P.W.1 : G.

Gattappa P.W.2 : M.G. Chandramma and got marked Ex.P1 : Statement of

P.W.1 Ex.P2 : 162 Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.1, Ex.P3 : 162 Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.2.

07. After closing of prosecution side evidence accused were examined

U/Sec.313 Cr.P.C by explaining the incriminating material found in the evidence of prosecution witnesses.

08. The plea of the accused is total denial of the truthness of the evidence of prosecution witnesses and reported no defence evidence.

09. Heard both sides. Perused the oral and documentary evidence on record.

10. The following point is raised for determination :-

Whether prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed an offence punishable U/Sec. 148, 324, 452, 427 and 506 of IPC ?

11. Above point is answered as herein below for the following // REASONS //

POINT :

Though P.W.1 defacto complainant namely Gattappa and P.W.2

M.G. Chandramma wife of P.W.1 deposed in their chief examination all the accused entered into their house and beat P.W.1 with hands, stones and kicked him with legs and P.Ws.1 and 2 felt afraid that accused may kill P.Ws.1 and 2 thrown the chilly powder into the eyes of all the accused and escaped from the scene of offence. Thereafter P.W.1 took treatment as P.W.1 sustained injuries in consequence of assault by the accused. But when come to the cross examination of P.W.1 deposed that he do not know the contents of Ex.P1 and at the time of alleged incident accused were not present at the scene of offence and no galata took place between the accused and P.Ws.1 and 2 deposed that accused were no way concerned to the alleged incident.

Considering the evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2 the learned Asst.

Public Prosecutor given up the evidence of remaining witnesses as discussed supra P.W.1 defacto complainant and P.W.2 who is the wife of P.W.1 and deposed to the extent that accused are no way concerned to the incident and accused were not present at the scene of offence at the time of incident.

Their evidence is no way useful to the prosecution, which cannot be based for the conviction of the accused.

Hence I have no hesitation to hold that prosecution failed to bring home the guilt of the accused for the offences punishable U/Sec. 148, 324, 452, 427 and 506 of IPC .

12. In the result, A1 to A15 are found not guilty for the offence punishable U/Sec. 148, 324, 452, 427 and 506 of IPC . Consequently, A1 to A15 are acquitted U/Sec. 248(1) Cr.P.C., for the said offences. The bail bonds of A1 to A15 shall stand canceled after expiry of six months. The unmarked, worthless and non valuable property if any shall be destroyed after appeal time.

Typed to my dictation by the personal Assistant, corrected and

pronounced by me in Open Court on this the 7th day of April , 2014.

Sd/ Subhash Chandra Bose, B.A,LL.B.,

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESS EXAMINED FOR

PROSECUTION DEFENCE: -NIL- P.W.1 : G. Gattappa.

P.W.2 : M.G. Chandramma

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

PROSECUTION

Ex.P1 : Statement of P.W.1.

Ex.P2 : 162 Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.1.

Ex.P3 : 162 Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.2.

DEFENCE: NIL

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

NIL

Sd/ Subhash Chandra Bose, B.A,LL.B.,

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

// True copy //

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF ICLASS,PALAMNER

Calendar in CC NO: 52 of 2010

Date of occurrence::16.2.2010 Date of complaint::17.2.2010 Date of taken on file::17.3.2010 Date of commencement of trial::7.11.2013 Date of closure of trial::4.04.2014 Date of sentence or order::07.04.2014

Name of the Complainant::The State rep. By the Inspector of Police,Gangavaram Circle . (Crime No. 20/2010 of Gangavaram P.S.)

Name of the accusedFather's / Husband's nameAge

1. Veluru Reddeppa,S/o late Venkatappa. 45 years,

2. Chenula Mani, S/o Chenula Venkatramappa. 35 years,

3. Nuberu Venkatramappa, S/o late Narappa. 50 years,

4. Tenkayala Narayanaswamy, S/o Munivenkatappa. 40 years,

5. Veluru Seenappa S/o late Venkatappa 35 years,

6. Veluru Maneppa, S/o late V. Gurrappa. 48 years,

7. Veluru Venkatesappa, S/o late Venkatappa. 50 years,

8. V. Subbanna, S/o Gurrappa. 40 years,

9. Ayyavaru Subramanyam, S/o late Nanjappa. 35 years,

10. Kanchala ugini Mahesh, S/o K. Gattappa. 25 years,

11. Nallanolla Daasappa, S/o Chinnavenkatappa. 36 years,

12. Varadappa S/o Gurrappa. 38 years,

13. Veluru Mani, S/o V. Krishnappa. 27 years,

14. Hanumanolla Sudhakar, S/o Thirumalappa. 25 years, 15.UpparapalleGownula S/o Krishnappa. 32 years, Munaswamy

VillageMandalReligionCalling A1 to A3, A5 to A15 Karnataka stateAll are Not known residents of Betanuru Hindus village,

Nature of offence : U/Sec. 148, 324, 452, 427 and 506 of IPC.

Finding of the Court :Found not guilty

Sentence or Order : In the result, A1 to A15 are found not guilty for the offence punishable U/Sec.148, 324, 452, 427 and 506 of IPC . Consequently, A1 to A15 are acquitted U/Sec. 248(1) Cr.P.C., for the said offences. The bail bonds of A1 to A15 shall stand canceled after expiry of 7 six months. The unmarked, worthless and non valuable property if any shall be destroyed after appeal time.

Sd/ Subhash Chandra Bose, B.A,LL.B.,

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

// True copy //

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

8 // True copy //

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

Sd/ Subhash Chandra Bose, B.A,LL.B.,

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

// True copy //

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

Sd/ Subhash Chandra Bose, B.A,LL.B.,

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

9 // True copy //

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

PALAMANER.

OS/42/2008

Sankarappa valle Chengalrayappa vs B. Krishna reddy

07 Apr 2014

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE : : PALAMANER.

Present : Sri Subhash Chandra Bose, B.A.,LL.B., Junior Civil Judge, Palamaner.

MONDAY , THE SEVENTH (7th) DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND FOURTEEN

O.S.NO. 42 OF 2008

Between:

Sankarappa valla Chengalrayappa, aged about 65 years, S/o Gurrappa, Hindu, cultivation, residing at Radha bunglow, Palamaner town, post and mandal, Chittoor district.

..Plaintiff.

And:

1. B. Krishna reddy, aged about 35 years, S/o B. Rami Reddy, Hindu, business.

2. B. Jayamma S/o B. Rami Reddy, Hindu,

Both are residing at Jellipeta village, Kurmai post, Palamaner mandal, Chittoor district. ……Defendants

This suit is coming on 07.04.2014 before me for hearing in the presence of Sri. P. Mohan Rami Reddy, Advocate for plaintiff and the defendants are set exparte. Upon hearing the counsel for the plaintiff and perusing the record, this court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

This is a suit for recovery of Rs. 24,080 /- (Rupees Twenty four thousand eighty only) being the principal, interest and notice charges due under the promissory note dt.9.12.2004 for Rs.14,000/- (Rupees Fourteen thousand only) and for costs.

2. The brief averments of the plaintiff’s case are:- The defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.14,000/- (Rupees Fourteen thousand only), agreeing to repay the same with interest @ 24% p.a. and executed the suit pronote on 9.12.2004 in favour of the plaintiff. Inspite of repeated demands the defendants did not pay the debt due under the suit pronote. Hence, the suit.

3. Plaintiff present filed his chief examination affidavit. Confirmed the contents of the same. Ex A.1/Suit promissory note dated 9.12.2004 is marked. The learned counsel for the plaintiff reported no further evidence. Heard. Perused the oral evidence of P.W.1 is consistent and coupled with documentary evidence Ex.A1. The same is believable in nature and remained un challenged. In view of the same, I feel that plaintiff is entitled to recover the entire suit claim.

4. In the result, suit is decreed with costs for sum of Rs. 24,080 /- (Rupees Twenty four thousand eighty only) and future interest is granted at the rate of 12 % p.a. from the date of suit till the date of decree and at the rate of 6 % p.a. from the date of decree till the date of realization on Prl. sum of Rs.14,000/-.

Typed my dictation by the Personal Assistant, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court this the 7th day of April, 2014.

Junior Civil Judge, Palamaner.

Appendix of evidence Witnesses examined For plaintiff for defendant.

PW.1 : Sankarappa valla Chengalrayappa Exparte

Exhibits marked on behalf of the plaintiff

Ex.A1/Suit pronote, Dated. 9.12.2004

Exhibits marked on behalf of defendant --NIL--

Junior Civil Judge. Palamaner.

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE : : PALAMANER.

Present : Sri Subhash Chandra Bose, B.A.,LL.B., Junior Civil Judge, Palamaner.

MONDAY , THE SEVENTH (7th) DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND FOURTEEN

O.S.NO. 42 OF 2008

Between:

Sankarappa valla Chengalrayappa, aged about 65 years, S/o Gurrappa, Hindu, cultivation, residing at Radha bunglow, Palamaner town, post and mandal, Chittoor district.

..Plaintiff.

And:

1. B. Krishna reddy, aged about 35 years, S/o B. Rami Reddy, Hindu, business.

2. B. Jayamma S/o B. Rami Reddy, Hindu,

Both are residing at Jellipeta village, Kurmai post, Palamaner mandal, Chittoor district. ……Defendants

Plaint presented on : 10.12.2007 Plaint Last represented on: 13.02.2008 Plaint filed on : 20.02.2008

Value of the suit is Rs.24,080/- and court fee of Rs.1,586/- is Paid u/S. 20 of APCF Act. Cause of action for the suit arose on 9.12.2004 within the jurisdiction of this court.

1. That the defendant do pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs. 24,080 /- (Rupees Twenty four thousand eighty only) and future interest is granted at the rate of 12 % p.a. from the date of suit till the date of decree and at the rate of 6 % p.a. from the date of decree till the date of realization on

Prl. sum of Rs.14,000/-, and

2. That the defendant do also pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.2,667/- being the costs of the suit:

Given under my hand and the seal of the court this the 07th day of April, 2014.

Junior Civil Judge. Palamaner.

STATEMENT OF COSTS

DescriptionPlaintiffDefendants

1) Stamp on Plaint: 1,586-00

2) Stamp on Vakalat: 2-00

3) Advocates Fees:993-00

4) Service of Process: 60-00 Exparte

5) Process pre. fee: 1-00

6) Typing Charges: 25-00

TOTAL:Rs.2,667-00

Junior Civil Judge. Palamaner.

------------------------------- Decree in O.S.No.42/2008

Dt. 07.04.2014.

-------------------------------

OS/142/2013

K.Krishnappa Vodayar vs T.Bhupathi

07 Apr 2014

Order Record 247 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OS/42/2008	Sankarappa valle Chengalrayappa vs B. Krishna reddy	07 Apr 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/142/2013	K.Krishnappa Vodayar vs T.Bhupathi	07 Apr 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/52/2010	SHO Gangavaram P.S vs V.Reddeppa	07 Apr 2014	Order On Exgibit	Acquitted
CC/127/2013	SHO Gangavaram PS vs K.Krishan	07 Apr 2014	Order On Exgibit	Acquitted
CC/128/2013	S.H.O Baireddipalle P.S. vs K.Krishna	07 Apr 2014	Order On Exgibit	Acquitted
OS/260/2012	J.Ramappa vs J.Venkatesu	04 Apr 2014	Order	—
DVC/2/2013	P.Devi vs P.Hari Babu	04 Apr 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/128/2013	M. Sridhar vs S. Srinivasulu	04 Apr 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/151/2013	S.Iqbal Basha vs M.Rehaman	04 Apr 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
EP/71/2012	A.Venu vs S.M.Rahman	28 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/152/2008	P.Lakshmamma vs N.Govindappa	28 Mar 2014	Order	—
CC/63/2012	SHO Palamaner Ex PS vs Thupakula Harinath	28 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/296/2011	SHO V.Kota P.S vs S.Venkatachalapathi	28 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/277/2011	SHO Palamaner PS vs M.Murali	27 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/11/2014	B.R.Kumaraswamy Naidu vs Smt.Hamsamma	25 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/112/2013	Smt.Vijayamma vs Reddeppa	21 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/136/2010	E.Lakshmanna vs E.Gurappa	21 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/213/2012	SHO Palamaner PS vs N.Raghu	21 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
EP/24/2013	S.Subba Reddy vs Vsk.Nagaraju	20 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/377/2009	SHO Palamaner PS vs K.Babu Naidu	19 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/380/2009	SHO Palamaner P.S. vs Dodapaneni Gopi	19 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/11/2012	SHO Palamaner P.S. vs K.Hari	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/255/2011	SHO Palamaner PS vs J.Mani	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/411/2008	SHO V.Kota P.S vs B.Chandrappa	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
MC/1/2014	Smt.Manjula vs M.Venkatramana	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
MC/2/2014	S.Almas vs K.Rahamthullla,	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
MC/3/2014	M.Sajeeda @ Sajeeda Begum vs L.Iliyas	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
MC/10/2013	V.Swathi vs Vsv.Sunil	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
MC/11/2013	Smt.K. Meenakshi vs Kavadi Kupendra @ Upendra	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
MC/12/2013	Smt. Saraswathi vs Sankarappa	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
MC/13/2013	K.Thanuja vs K.Chiranjeevi	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/1/2013	G.Ramanjula Naidu vs P.Krishnamurthy	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/3/2014	S.Khaja Hussain vs M.Siva Kumar	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/9/2014	Ms Induslnd Bank, Limited vs Paleti Subramanyam	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/57/2013	C.Muni Reddy vs J.V.Murali krishna	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/65/2013	D.P. Rudresh vs C. Thyagaraj	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/67/2013	K. Mahesh vs M. Shabbeer Khan	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/68/2013	R. Balaram Chetty @ Kutty vs P.H. mahandranath	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/72/2013	G. Rajendra vs G. Damodaram	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/73/2013	M.Ekambaram vs P.Subramanyam	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/81/2013	R. Purusotham Reddy vs R. Mohan	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/82/2013	N.S. Prakash Kumar vs C. Thagaraju	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/86/2013	G. Veerabhadraiah vs T. Badrinath	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/87/2013	R. Padmanabham vs A.G. Thippanna	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/88/2013	H.B. Rajendra vs C. Thyagaraj	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/89/2013	B.R. Shankar Babu vs G. Raghupathy Naidu	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/99/2013	M. Balaraju vs P. Ramachandran	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/102/2013	P. Siddappa vs R. Krishnappa naidu	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/109/2013	A.S,Ganesh vs G.Venkatesh	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/110/2013	B. Ramu vs T. Ravi Kumar Joseph	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/117/2013	S.Venkatesulu vs V.Ramesh Naidu	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/118/2013	T.K. Showkath Ali vs M. Balaji	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/119/2013	R.Padmanabaham vs S.Nagaraju	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/120/2013	M.Prathap vs K.Bharathamma	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/124/2013	T.Jayamma vs R.S.Lokanadham	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/125/2013	V.Balaji vs S.Srinivasulu	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/127/2013	S.Radhamma vs S.Mallika	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/140/2013	B.M.Ramamoorthy Achary vs V.Govardhan,	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/152/2013	G.Mohan Reddy vs G.A. Azam	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/154/2013	SHO Gangavaram P.S vs E.Srinivasa	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/155/2013	M.Mallikharjuna vs P.Amjualikhan	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/160/2013	N.Ramachandraiah vs P.V.Bhaskar,	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/208/2011	p.R.Ramakrishna Reddy vs C.Somasekhar Reddy	14 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/118/2012	SHO Palamaner P.S. vs V.Vijay@ Appaiah	14 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/122/2012	SHO Palamaner P.S. vs V.Vijay@ Appaiah	14 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/122/2013	L. Chandrasekhar vs N. Muniratham	14 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
PRC/28/2013	Inspector of Police, Kuppam Circle vs N.C.Venkatramappa	13 Mar 2014	Order	—
OS/18/2014	Smt.M.Laxmi Devamma vs S.Chinnapa Reddy	12 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/123/2013	S. Mohammad Basha vs K. Murali	06 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/291/2013	SHO vs P.Venkata Reddy @ Appaiah	05 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/374/2003	SHO V.Kota P.S. vs P.Nadipanna Nagaraju	05 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/27/2014	M.V. Inspector, Palamaner. vs A.Hemanth	05 Mar 2014	Order	—
STC/28/2013	Ms Shriram Chits Pvt. Limited, vs K.V.Satheesh	05 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
STC/28/2014	M.V. Inspectr, Palamaner vs K.Sameyulla	05 Mar 2014	Order	—
STC/64/2013	Shriram chit P.Venkatesu vs T.Ravi	05 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/1/2008	T.Anwar Basha alias FayazaAhamad vs M.K. Abdul Wahab saheb	04 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/350/2007	Mukkupogula Venkatappa vs Gurran Seenappa	03 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/6/2007	M.Sekhar vs M.Parvathamma	28 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/159/2004	S.Venkatramaiah vs S.Sreenivasulu	28 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/145/2001	SHO Palamaner Ex PS vs Gopi	26 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/172/2010	SHO Palamaner PS vs Shaik Ansar Baha	26 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/188/2007	SHO Palamaner P.S. vs A.Samuel Das	26 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/304/2011	SHO Palamaner PS vs B.Ugandhar	26 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/305/2011	SHO Palamaner PS vs C.Nagaraja	26 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/9/2014	Somanadham Gounder vs M.Balaji	25 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/123/2010	Vasanthamma vs J.M.IIiaz Basha	25 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/241/2009	R.Vasudeva Reddy vs G.Mogilappa	25 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/113/2013	Smt.Kanakamma vs Govindappa	24 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/19/2010	Palamaner P.S. vs R. Karunakaran	24 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/82/2008	A.Venugopal @ A.Gopinath vs B.Jayaram	20 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/111/2013	B. Hussain Sab vs Anumappa	20 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/186/2001	A. Krishnamoorthy died vs Smt. Golla Manjulamma	20 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/277/2008	SHO Gangavaram P.S. vs M.Muneppa @ Muniyappa	19 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/91/2012	SHO Palamaner P.S vs S. Rasool	18 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/226/2010	R.Jyothi vs R.Areppa	17 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/311/2008	G. Rajendra Reddy vs K.G.Sreenivasulu	17 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/54/2012	SHO Palamaner Excise P.S. vs Periyal Anand	17 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/36/2010	P.Geethamm vs P.Munirathnam	14 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/96/2006	L.Papulamma vs B.N.Krishnappa	14 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/286/2009	C.Balakrishna vs O.M.Jayhaseeladr	14 Feb 2014	Order	—

Showing 100 of 247 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Apr 2014		9
Mar 2014		68
Feb 2014		45
Jan 2014		39
Dec 2013		31
Nov 2013		59

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Sri SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE handled?

Sri SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE has handled 251 court orders since 2011 at Court of Junior Civil Judge,, Palamaner (Taluka). The average disposal rate is 7 orders per month.

What types of cases does Sri SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE hear?

Based on available records, Sri SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE primarily handles Criminal matters (Criminal Cases, Summary Trial Cases) and Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) at Court of Junior Civil Judge,, Palamaner (Taluka).

Where is Sri SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE currently posted?

Sri SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE is posted as JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE at Court of Junior Civil Judge,, Palamaner (Taluka), Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Sri SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Sri SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Sri SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE dispose cases?

Sri SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE disposes approximately 7 cases per month, based on 251 orders handled over their tenure at Court of Junior Civil Judge,, Palamaner (Taluka).

Since when is Sri SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE serving?

Sri SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE has been serving at Court of Junior Civil Judge,, Palamaner (Taluka) since 2011.

Case Types

OS 38%

CC 32%

STC 22%

MC 3%

EP 2%

PRC 2%

DVC 1%

RCC 0%

Posting History

May 2011 — Apr 2014

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE · 251 orders

Outcomes on Record

Acquitted 3

Other Judges at this Court

Smt. Manadala Likitha

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

1,374 orders

← View all judges at Court of Junior Civil Judge,, Palamaner (Taluka)

Sri Subhash Chandra Bose

TWO THOUSAND FOURTEEN

J U D G M E N T

PALAMANER.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESS EXAMINED FOR

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

PROSECUTION

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF ICLASS,PALAMNER

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

TWO THOUSAND FOURTEEN

J U D G M E N T

PALAMANER.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESS EXAMINED FOR

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

PROSECUTION

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF ICLASS,PALAMNER

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

TWO THOUSAND FOURTEEN

J U D G M E N T

PALAMANER.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESS EXAMINED FOR

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

PROSECUTION

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF ICLASS,PALAMNER

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

PALAMANER.

TWO THOUSAND FOURTEEN

J U D G M E N T

TWO THOUSAND FOURTEEN

STATEMENT OF COSTS

JUDGMENT

Suit for recovery of Rs.68,000/­ being the principal and interest due

under the pronote dated 01.06.2010 executed by the defendant in favour

of the plaintiff for Rs.50,000/­ promising to repay the same with interest at

24% p.a., and for future interest and costs.

Suit for recovery of Rs.68,000/ being the principal and interest due

of the plaintiff for Rs.50,000/ promising to repay the same with interest at