Ms Swarupa Kaatam

Junior Civil Judge

Achampet, JCJ Court Complex · Nagarkurnool · Telangana

Ms Swarupa Kaatam, Junior Civil Judge, is posted at Achampet, JCJ Court Complex, Nagarkurnool, Telangana, India. 1,754 court orders on record since 2021. 16 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CC, OS, MC cases.

1,754

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

OS/98/2023

Barla Parsha Ramulu vs Bala Venkataiah

27 Apr 2023

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT NAGARKURNOOL.

Thursday, on this 27th day of April, 2023.

Present :-Ms.Swarupa Kaatam, Prl.Junior Civil Judge, Nagarkurnool.

O.S.No. 98 of 2023.

Between:- Sri.Barla Parsha Ramulu S/o. Venkataiah, Age. 41 years, Occ. Agril., R/o. Gorita Village, Thimmajipet Mandal, Nagarkurnool District

....Plaintiff

And

1. Sri. Barla Venkataiah s/o Late Barla Shankaraiah, Age: 54 Years,

2. Sri. Barla Kondaiah s/o Late Barla Shankaraiah, Age: 50 Years,

3. Sri. Barla Raju s/o Late Barla Shankaraiah, Age: 35 Years,

4. Sri. Barla Hanmanthu s/o Late Barla Kondaiah, Age: 42 Years,

5. Sri. Barla Venkataramudu s/o Late Barla Kondaiah, Age: 42 Years,

6. Sri. Barla Ramulu s/o Late Barla Chinna Nagaiah, Age: 40 Years,

7. Sri. Barla Venkataiah s/o Late Barla Ramulu, Age: 56 Years, All Occ: Agrl & Resident of Gorita Village of Thimmajipet Mandal of Nagarkurnool District

....Defendants

Claim: Suit for grant Permanent injunction decree.

*** This suit is coming before me on 25-04-2023 for final hearing in the presence of Sri. A.Parvath Reddy, Advocate for the Plaintiff and the defendants are made as set exparte and having been stood over for consideration till this day this court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

1. This is a suit filed by the plaintiffs for grant of permanent injunction decree against the defendants that restraining the defendants, their relatives, henchmen and all other persons from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the suit schedule property.

2. The brief averments of the plaint are as follows :-

Originally the land in Sy.No. 140/12 to an extent Ac. 0-34 gts situated at Gorita

Village of Thimmajipet mandal of Nagarkurnool district is the ancestral property of grandfather of the plaintiff namely Barla Nagaiah s/o Hanmanthu, Resident of Gorita village of Thimmajipet mandal of Nagarkurnool district. After death of the grandfather of the plaintiff namely Barla Nagaiah s/o Hanmanthu, the father of the plaintiff namely Barla Venkataiah has succeeded the said land and got implemented the said land on his name through ROR proceeding amendment No. B/1313/2015

Dt.14/12/2015, the then M.R.O. Thimmajipet has issued pattadar pass book in his favor and recorded his name in concern revenue records. Thereafter the father of the plaintiff namely Barla Venkataiah has gifted away the said land to the plaintiff through a Regd. Gift deed No. 124 of 2021 Dt. 28-01-2021 and the said gift has accepted by the plaintiff and took the possession of the same on the date of gift and got mutated the said land on his name in concern revenue records then the revenue authorities have given Sy.No140/12/2 to an extent of Ac.0-34 gts situated at Gorita

Village of Thimmajipet mandal of Nagarkurnool district and The Tahsildar

Thimmajipet mandal has issued pattadar pass book and title deed

No.T03160111132 in favor of the plaintiff. Thus the plaintiff has become the owner of the said property by virtue of Gift deed, which is clearly described in the schedule appended to this plaint and the same may kindly be treated as part of these pleadings, further the same will be hereinafter referred as suit schedule property.

The plaintiff is continuing his possession and enjoyment over the suit schedule property since from the date of gift deed to till today without any body's concern.

The plaintiff has taken crop loan of Rs.37,000/- (Rs. Thirty seven Thousand only) from U.B.I. Thimmajipet Branch by depositing his original Rythu pattadar pass book cum title deed No. T03160111132, as such he is unable to produce the same before this Hon'ble court now.

The defendants having land nearer to suit schedule property towards northern side, have demanded the plaintiff to give the suit schedule property on lease to them for cheaper rate, but the plaintiff has refused to the same and said that he wanted to cultivate the same personally, as such they bore grudge against the plaintiff and without having no any concern, title or possession over the suit schedule property with an evil intention to grab away the suit schedule property came over to suit schedule property on 02-03-2023 and obstructed the plaintiff when he was working in the suit schedule property with the help of laborers, then the plaintiff was able to restrict the defendants at such movement with a great difficulty with the help of laborers. Then the defendants have went away from suit schedule property while giving threats that they will occupy suit schedule property in a day or two by coming with more force. The acts and activities of defendants are illegal and unwarranted and as such the plaintiff is entitled to sue and the defendants are liable to be sued. Hence, the suit.

3. On perusal of the record i.e., docket sheet proceedings, on dt: 25-04-2023 as the defendants remained absent and as there is no representation on behalf of defendants after receiving the summons the defendants are made as set Ex-parte.

4. In support of their claim, the plaintiff is examined as PW 1 and got marked

Ex. A.1 to A.7 to prove the suit claim.

5. Heard the counsel for the plaintiff.

6. The Plaintiff who is examined himself filed an affidavit in lieu of chief examination as PW1 before this court by reiterating the averments of the plaint and stated that the contents of the affidavit are true and correct. In support of his claim, as stated above Ex. A1 to A7 are marked.

1. Ex. A1 is the Original Pattedar passbook of father of the plaintiff

2. Ex. A2 is the Original ROR proceedings no. B/1313/2015, dt: 14-12-2015

3. Ex. A3 is the Original Registered Gift deedno.142/2021,dt:20-01-2021

4. Ex. A4 is the Original endorsement given by Bank manager UBI Thimmajipet branch dt: 04-03-2023

5. Ex. A5 is the Attested specimen copy of pattadar passbook and title deed of plaintiff dated 30-01-2021

6. Ex. A6 is the Specimen copy Dharani ROR

7. Ex. A7 is the Copy of Dharani land details

7. The main contention of the Plaintiff is that the defendant, who are no way concerned with the suit schedule property are trying to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment over the suit schedule property. On perusal of the record, as the defendants remained absent and as there is no representation on behalf of defendants after receiving the summons the defendants are made as set

Ex-parte on 25-04-2023. On perusal of Ex.A1 to A7 coupled with the oral evidence of

PW1. It is evident that the plaintiff is in peaceful possession over the petition schedule property. As there is no rebuttal evidence of PW1, it remains unchallenged. Hence it can be said that the plaintiff has established his case against the defendant.

8. In the result, the suit is decreed by granting perpetual injunction in favour of plaintiff against the defendants that restraining the defendants, their relatives, henchmen and supporters from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the suit schedule property .

Typed my dictation by Stenographer Grade-III, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 27th day of April, 2023.

Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Nagarkrunool.

Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses examined

For the Plaintiff. For Defendant

PW.1 B.Parsha Ramuluu Set exparte.

Exhibits marked.

1. Ex. A1 is the Original Pattedar passbook of father of the plaintiff

2. Ex. A2 is the Original ROR proceedings no. B/1313/2015, dt: 14-12-2015

3. Ex. A3 is the Original Registered Gift deedno.142/2021,dt:20-01-2021

4. Ex. A4 is the Original endorsement given by Bank manager UBI Thimmajipet branch dt: 04-03-2023

5. Ex. A5 is the Attested specimen copy of pattadar passbook and title deed of plaintiff dated 30-01-2021

6. Ex. A6 is the Specimen copy Dharani ROR

7. Ex. A7 is the Copy of Dharani land details

Prl.Junior Civil Judge Nagarkurnool.

OS/407/2022

Edula Chandra Shekar Reddy vs Vettela Dasharatham

27 Apr 2023

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT NAGARKURNOOL.

Thursday, on this 27th day of Aprial, 2023.

Present :- Ms.Swarupa Kaatam, Prl.Junior Civil Judge, Nagarkurnool.

O.S.No. 407 of 2022.

Between:- Edual Chandra Shekar Reddy S/o Narayana Reddy, Age; 36 years, Occ; Agril, R/o Ippalapally village of Thimmajipet mandal.

....Plaintiffs

And

1. Vettela Dasharatham S/o Sailu, Age; 50 years, occ; Agril,

2. Vettela Laxmamma w/o Dasharatham, Age; 45 years, occ; Agril, Both r/o B.C Colony, Thimmajipet proper.

3. Potta Dasharatham S/o Laxmaiah, Age: 55 years, occ; Agril,

4. Karre Gopi S/o Narsaiah, Age: 36 years, Occ; Agrl,

5. Kurva Rangaiah S/o Jogaiah, Age; 60 years, occ;Agril,

6. Mala Laxmamma w/o Krishnaiah, Age; 60 years, occ; Agril, All R/o Ippalapally village of Thimmajipet mandal.

....Defendants

Claim: Suit for grant Permanent injunction decree.

***

This suit is coming before me on 30-11-2022 for final hearing in the presence of Sri. B.Raja Shekar, Advocate for the Plaintiff and the defendants are made as set exparte and having been stood over for consideration till this day this court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

Ippalapally village of Thimmajipet mandal.

2. The brief averments of the plaint are as follows :-

The plaintiff and defendants No. 3 to 6 are the native of Ippalapally village of Thimmajipet mandal and the defendant No. 1 and 2 are the native of Thimmajipet proper and living by doing agriculture. The Plaintiff is the owner and possessor of the land in Sy.No.236/B1 to an extent Ac. 01-13 gts, Sy.No. 236 to an extent Ac.01-14 gts total extent Ac.02-27 gts like one plot situated at Ippalapally village of Thimmajipet mandal. The above said land hereinafter called as suit schedule property. The plaintiff is cultivating the suit schedule property personally. The suit schedule property belongs to one Bala Kista Reddy who is the grandfather of the plaintiff, after death of the Balakista Reddy; the plaintiff mutated his name in the revenue records as VIRASATH. Further since from the date of succession the plaintiff is cultivating the suit schedule property till today without any interruption from anybody in any corner till today.

That the defendants are no way concerned Suit schedule property, but the defendants are trying to interfere illegally without any right or interest over the suit schedule property with an intention to occupy some portion of suit schedule property. Further the defendant No.1 and 2 land is existing west side and the defendant No. 4 land existing north side of the suit schedule property. But the plaintiff resisted the defendants with the help of neighbors. The plaintiff is taking good crop from his lands as such with an eyesore the defendants are trying to interfere and also trying to occupy the suit lands by demanding to sell away the land to them at cheaper rate, when the plaintiff refused sell the lands to them, the defendants started illegal interference several times taking advantage of their political influence in the village as they are politically active, but the plaintiffs resisted their illegal interference. Finally on 12-06-2022 the defendants along with their supporters came to the suit lands and tried to occupy the suit lands. But with great difficulty the plaintiff stopped the illegal interference over the suit lands by the defendants with the help of neighbor farmers. While leaving the suit lands the defendants threatened that they will come again with much force and occupy the suit lands then nobody can stop them. That the act of the defendants are illegal and against law and only it will cause loss and irreparable injury to plaintiffs. Hence, the suit.

3. On perusal of the record i.e., docket sheet proceedings, on dt: 30- 11-2022 as as the defendants remained absent and as there is no representation on behalf of defendants after receiving the summons the defendants are made as set Ex-parte.

4. In support of their claim, the plaintiff is examined as PW 1 and got marked Ex. A.1 to A.9 to prove the suit claim.

5. Heard the counsel for the plaintiff.

1. Ex. A1 is the Online Specimen copy dated 06-06-2022

2. Ex. A2 is the Online copies of Dharani (2sheets)

3. Ex. A3 is the Online copy of New Pattadar Pass Book of Plaintiff

4. Ex. A4 is the CC of panchanamma along with map dated 19-06-2021

5. Ex. A5 is the CC of Pahani for the year 1991-92

6. Ex. A6 is the CC of Pahani for the year 1994-95

7. Ex. A7 is the CC of Pahani for the year 2000-01

8. Ex. A8 is the CC of Pahani for the year 2004-05

9. Ex. A9 is the CC of Pahani for the year 2009-10

On perusal of the record, as the defendants remained absent and as there is no representation on behalf of defendants after receiving the summons the defendants are made as set Ex-parte on 30-11-2022. On perusal of Ex.A1 to

A9 coupled with the oral evidence of PW1. It is evident that the plaintiff is in peaceful possession over the petition schedule property. As there is no rebuttal evidence of PW1, it remains unchallenged. Hence it can be said that the plaintiff has established his case against the defendant.

8. In the result, the suit is decreed by granting perpetual injunction in favour of plaintiff against the defendants that restraining the defendants, their men, agents and supporters from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the suit schedule property situated at Ippalapally village of Thimmajipet mandal.

Typed my dictation by Stenographer Grade-III, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open court on this the 27th day of April, 2023.

Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Nagarkrunool.

Appendix of Evidence Witnesses examined

For the Plaintiff. For Defendant PW.1 E.C.Shekar Reddy Set exparte.

Exhibits marked.

1. Ex. A1 is the Online Specimen copy dated 06-06-2022

2. Ex. A2 is the Online copies of Dharani (2sheets)

3. Ex. A3 is the Online copy of New Pattadar Pass Book of Plaintiff

4. Ex. A4 is the CC of panchanamma along with map dated 19-06-2021

5. Ex. A5 is the CC of Pahani for the year 1991-92

6. Ex. A6 is the CC of Pahani for the year 1994-95

7. Ex. A7 is the CC of Pahani for the year 2000-01

8. Ex. A8 is the CC of Pahani for the year 2004-05

9. Ex. A9 is the CC of Pahani for the year 2009-10

Prl.Junior Civil Judge Nagarkurnool.

OS/189/2022

Chetamoni Chinnaiah vs Kongari Shiva

27 Apr 2023

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT NAGARKURNOOL.

Thursday, on this 27th day of April, 2023.

Present :- Ms.Swarupa Kaatam, Prl.Junior Civil Judge, Nagarkurnool.

O.S.No. 189 of 2022.

Between:- Chetamoni Chinnaiah S/o. Choudaiah, Age. 50 years, Occ. Agril., R/o. Yendabetla village of Nagarkurnool Mandal and District.

....Plaintiff

And

Kongari Shiva S/o. Venkataiah, Age. 30 years, Occ. Coolie, R/o. Yendabetla village of Nagarkurnool Mandal and District.

....Defendant

Claim: Suit for grant Permanent injunction decree.

***

This suit is coming before me on 05-01-2023 for final hearing in the presence of Sri. K.Ravikanth Rao and others, Advocates for the Plaintiff and the defendant are made as set exparte and having been stood over for consideration till this day this court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

1. This is a suit filed by the plaintiffs for grant of permanent injunction decree against the defendants that restraining the defendants, their men, agents and supporters from interfering or entering with the peacedul possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the suit schedule property i.e., Plot No. 179 admeasuring 45X45 Sq.yards total extent measuring 225 Sq.yards in Sy.No. 20 situated at Bheemaram Village H/o. Yendabetla village of Nagarkurnool Mandal and

District.

2. The brief averments of the plaint are as follows :-

The plaintiff and defendant are resident of Yendabetla Village of

Nagarkurnool Mandal and District. There is no relationship between the plaintiff and defendant. The Government as assigned the plots to the several beneficiaries in

Sy no. 20 situated at Bheemaram Village H/o Yendabetla Village of Nagarkurnool

Mandal and District. The plaintiff is one of the beneficiaries in the said plots and the

Government as assigned a plot no.179 admeasuring 45 X 45 sq.yds total extent measuring 225 sq.yds in Sy no. 20 situated at Bheemaram H/O Yendabetla Village of

Nagarkurnool Mandal and District. To that effects a patta certificate was issued vide no. B/51/2004 dated; 03/02/2007. Since then the plaintiff is in possession of the said plot. The plaintiff has obtained the permission from the Gram Panchayath

Yendabetla vide a file no. 12/2017 dated; 04/09/2017 as shown in the Map to construct a house. Subsequently the plaintiff has dumped material for construction of the house and the same is on the spot. Due to paucity of funds the plaintiff could not proceed with the construction. The said Bheemaram H/o Yendabetia Village merged in the Municipality of Nagarkurnool and the Value of the property has become more value.

That the defendant has got no right or interest in any manner over the suit plot. But due to enmity between the plaintiff and defendant, the defendant tried to interfere illegally on 05/03/2022 and on timely interference of the plaintiff, the plaintiff could able to protect is possession over the suit land. Again on 19/03/2022 the defendant and his illegal supporters have tried to disturb the material which is on the spot and also tried to disposes the plaintiff, but the plaintiff protected his law full possession on the spot with the help of well wishers. While leaving the suit property the defendant warned the plaintiff that he will come with more force and disposes the plaintiff and occupy the suit property. The said illegal activities of the defendant were compliant to the police Nagarkurnool and the police advise the plaintiff to approach the civil court as the dispute is in civil nature. If the defendant succeeds in his illegal acts the plaintiff will be put to much irreparable loss and which cannot be compensated in any manner. Hence, the suit.

3. On perusal of the record i.e., docket sheet proceedings, on dt: 05-01-2023 as the written statements for defendants despite the last chance and after expiry of statutory period. Hence, defendants right to file the written statements is forfeited and are made as set exparte and the case is posted for Evidence of Plaintiff.

4. In support of their claim, the plaintiff is examined as PW 1 and got marked

Ex. A.1 and A2 to prove the suit claim.

5. Heard the counsel for the plaintiff.

1. Ex. A1 is the original patta certificate No. B/51/2004 by Tahsildar Nagarkurnoo.

2. Ex. A2 is the Original permission granted by panchayat secretary Yendabetla vide No.12/2017.

7. The main contention of the Plaintiff is that the defendant, who are no way concerned with the suit schedule property are trying to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment over the suit schedule property. On perusal of the record, as the written statements for defendants despite the last chance and after expiry of statutory period. Hence, defendants right to file the written statements is forfeited and are made as set exparte and the case is posted for

Evidence of Plaintiff on 05-01-2023. On perusal of Ex.A1 and A2 coupled with the oral evidence of PW1. It is evident that the plaintiff is in peaceful possession over the petition schedule property. As there is no rebuttal evidence of PW1, it remains unchallenged. Hence it can be said that the plaintiff has established his case against the defendant.

8. In the result, the suit is decreed by granting perpetual injunction in favour of plaintiff against the defendants that restraining the defendants, their men, agents and supporters from interfering or entering with the peacedul possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the suit schedule property i.e., Plot No. 179 admeasuring 45X45 Sq.yards total extent measuring 225 Sq.yards in Sy.No. 20 situated at Bheemaram Village H/o. Yendabetla village of Nagarkurnool Mandal and

District.

Typed my dictation by Stenographer Grade-III, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 27th day of April, 2023.

Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Nagarkrunool.

Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses examined

For the Plaintiff. For Defendant PW.1 C.Chinnaiah Set exparte.

Exhibits marked.

1. Ex. A1 is the original patta certificate No. B/51/2004 by Tahsildar Nagarkurnoo.

2. Ex. A2 is the Original permission granted by panchayat secretary Yendabetla vide No.12/2017.

Prl.Junior Civil Judge Nagarkurnool.

CC/535/2018 Acquitted

Vennu Kashinath vs Karvan Sandeep

03 Mar 2023

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

AT ACHAMPET

Dated, this the 3 rd Day of March, 2023

PRESENT

SRI UPPADHYAY VIJAY KUMAR

JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

ACHAMPET

C.C.No. 535 OF 2018

Between:

The State of Telangana, rep. by Sub-inspector of Police, Achampet, Police

Station.

… PROSECUTION

AND

Karvan Sandeep, S/o. Maheshwar Singh, Age: 34 years, Occ: Tractor driver,

R/o: Achampet now at Mahabubnagar.

…ACCUSED

This case is coming before me for hearing on 02.01.2023 in the presence of learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for State and of Sri G. Rajender the learned Counsel for the Accused, upon hearing both sides and the matter having stood over for consideration, till this day, the Court delivered the following:-

:: J U D G M E N T ::

1.This case is filed by the Sub Inspector of Police, Achampet Police Station against Accused in Cr.No. 116/2018 for the offence punishable under Section 304-A of IPC {hereinafter referred to as “I.P.C.” for the sake of brevity}.

2.The brief facts of the case are that on 18.09.2018 at 08:30 hour the complainant Sri. Vennu Kashinath s/o Krishnaiah, aged-40 yrs, caste-mere, occp-business, r/o Achampet town lodged a Telugu written complaint with contents that, yesterday 17.09.2018 at about night 0130 hours his brother in 2 law by name Soma Anand s/o Anjaneyulu, age:41yrs, caste: Mere, Occp-hotel business, r/o Achampet town on the occasion of Ganesh nimajjan procession of the idol while his brother in law Anand sitting on the tractor, then they reached at Hero show room at Achampet then the Tractor no. TS 31 ATR 1376 driver by name Karvan Sandeep s/o Maheswar Singh, age:34yrs, Caste:

Bondili, Oec:Driver, r/o Achampet now at Mahaboob nagar drove his tractor rash and negligent manner. Then his brother In law Anand fell down on the road and received head injury. Immediately they shifted him to hospital. The duty doctor declared he was already died. Finally he requested to take necessary legal action.

On the contents of the above petition the LW-13 (SIP P.S Achampet) has registered a case in Cr.no. 116/2018 U/s 304(A) IPC and investigated into.

3.The FIR was received and registered for the offence U/S 304-A IPC. On completion of the investigation, Achampet. Police laid down the charge sheet against the accused U/S.304-A IPC.

4. On 18-09-2018, U/S.41(A) Cr.P.C notice was issued to the accused and he is released on Station Bail.

5. Whether the prosecution proved the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt?

POINT:-

6.Pw1 who is complainant and eye witness, deposed that he do not know the any facts of the case, he did not lodge any compliant and police never examined and recorded his statement.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor declared Pw1 as hostile and during his cross examination, nothing was elicited by the Learned Additional Public

Prosecutor.

7.Pw2 who is wife of deceased and PW-3 who is brother of deceased, deposed that they do not know anything about the case, police never examined and recorded their statements.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor declared Pw2 and PW-3 as hostile and during their cross examination, nothing was elicited by the Learned

Additional Public Prosecutor.

8.Pw4 and PW-5 who are eye witness, deposed that they do not know anything about the case, they did not witness the incident and police never examined and recorded their statements.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor declared Pw4 and PW-5 as hostile and during their cross examination, nothing was elicited by the Learned

Additional Public Prosecutor.

9.As all the material witness turned hostile the Hon’ble Court has closed the evidence of remaining witness.

10.From the above evidence it is evident that prosecution failed to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt and neither of the prosecution witness has supported the prosecution case.

11. In the result, Accused is found not guilty for the offenses punishable under Section 304-A of IPC and accordingly, he is acquitted U/s.255(1) of

Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the Accused shall remain in force for a period of Six months as envisaged U/s.437-A of Cr.P.C.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 03rd day of March, 2023.

JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

ACHAMPET

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PROSECUTION FOR ACCUSED

PW-1V. Kashinath

PW-2S. Suguna

PW-3S. Pandu

PW-4V. Vikram

PW-5V. Krishna

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PROSECUTION FOR ACCUSED

Ex.P-1161 CrPC statement of PW-1

Ex.P-2Complaint

Ex.P-3161 CrPC statement of PW-2

Ex.P-4161 CrPC statement of PW-3

Ex.P-5161 CrPC statement of PW-4

Ex.P-6161 CrPC statement of PW-5

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

:: MO-1 ::

Sd/-

JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

ACHAMPET.

CC/3/2022 Convicted

State of Telangana vs Praveen Chukka

12 Mar 2022

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL I ADDL.JUDGE-cum-SPL.JMFC(MOBILE) AT

NAGARKURNOOL

DATED : 12thday of March, 2022

PRESENT: MS Swarupa kaatam I Addl.JCJ-cum-Spl.JMFC(Mobile), Nagarkurnool.

CC. No.3 of 2022

Between:-

MD Khaleel ASIPOLice gopalpet

..Complaint AND

Praveen Chukka S/o Kurmaiah age:23 years, Occ:Tractor driver

Address - H.no.4-36 Thadiparthy village of Gopalpet mandal Wanaparthy,Telangana

...Accused

Offence punishable under : U/s 379 IPC

DOCKET ORDER:

Suo motu advanced to this day in view of the National Lok Adalath. Accused called present. The accused is examined U/s 239 Cr.P.C for the offence punishable U/s.379 IPC to which the accused voluntarily pleaded guilty for the offence punishable under section 379 IPC. Accordingly, the accused is convicted U/s 241 Cr.P.C. The accused is questioned on the quantum of sentence going to be awarded against the accused on his admission of guilt but the accused pleaded mercy of the court and submitted that he is the only bread winner of his family and that he has children who are depended on him and they will be deprived of their lively hood if he is kept in Jail, therefore, considering the submission made by the accused and also considering the nature of offence which is grave in nature, committed against state property, this court is considered view that to prevent the breach of damage to public property the offenders of such offences must be dealt with serious punishments but at the same time, as settled, before awarding such sentences, the family and the dependents of the accused must be taken into consideration, therefore, while taking all aspects into consideration, this court held that, imposing fine amount of Rs.5000/- (Rupees Five thousand only) would meet the ends of justice. Accordingly, the accused is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- (Rupees Five thousand only) for the offence punishable U/s.379 IPC and in default the accused shall suffer simple imprisonment for one month. The bail bonds of accused shall stands cancelled. The interim custody of property given to owner is made absolute. Total fine amount is Rs.5000/-(Rupees Five Thousand only)

Pronounced by me in the open court, on this the 12 th day of March, 2022.

I Addl.JCJ-cum-Spl.JMFC(mobile) Nagarurnool

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT NAGARKURNOOL

31 th day of October, 2020 PRESENT: Sri.T. Murali Mohan Junior Civil Judge-Cum, Spl.Mobile,Nagarkurnool Nagarkurnool

Cr. No.207 of 2020

Between:- Kdaem Laxmamma W/o Late Shankartaiah, age:58 years, Caste:Veeramusti, Occ:Coolie R/o

Uyyalawada village of Nagarkurnool mandal

Complaint AND

Sarangi Balaraju @ Balaswamy S/o Jambulaiah, age:52 years, Caste:Veeramusti, Occ:Coolie, R/o

Moosapet now at Marketyard, Nagarkurnool

.Accused

Offence punishable under : U/s 302 IPC of CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

ORDER:

Perused the record. The recordes discloses that the accused was remanded to Judicial custody on 27-06-2020 and sine them he has been in judicial custody. The secured further discloses that the present case was requested apart the accused for the offence under section 302 IPC. The report of Seeterm check ----- that no charge sheet is filed in them case as

Pronounced by me in the open court, on this the 23 rd day of November, 2020.

Junior Civil Judge, Nagarkurnool.

Order Record 1,726 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
STC/12/2022	State of Telangana vs Bogaraju venkataiah and others	02 May 2023	Judgement	Compromised
OS/403/2022	Bolgam Yadamma vs Thummala Lingam and another	29 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/322/2020	Gopala Shivaiah vs Poreddy Chandra Shekar	28 Apr 2023	judgement	—
OS/62/2018	Ravula Bala Jangaiah vs Patnam Jangaiah	28 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/107/2022	M.Janardhan Reddy vs Duvvasi Ratnamma	28 Apr 2023	Judgement	Compromised
OS/205/2020	A. Ashirvadhan S/o Late Koraiah vs Anandam S/o Ram Chandraiah	28 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/283/2020	Mamidala Jayamma W/o Late Bhupal Reddy vs Kotha Renuvas Reddy S/o Chinna Papi Reddy	28 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/438/2022	Mekala Thirupathamma w/o Mallaiah vs Mekala Pedda Ramulu and others	28 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/738/2021	B.Tanamma vs B.Sathaiah	28 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
CC/100588/2017	Kasula Suresh vs Gona Praveen	28 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/98/2023	Barla Parsha Ramulu vs Bala Venkataiah	27 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/189/2022	Chetamoni Chinnaiah vs Kongari Shiva	27 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/407/2022	Edula Chandra Shekar Reddy vs Vettela Dasharatham	27 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/595/2021	Chikkondra Srisailam vs Bonkuri Harikrishna	27 Apr 2023	Order	—
CC/65/2023	Maddemoni Hanmanthu vs Jurru Maddileti	27 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
CC/77/2016	PS Nagarkurnool vs Kotra Satyanarayana	27 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
CC/81/2016	PS Nagarkurnool vs Shaik Jamal Mohammed	27 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
CC/132/2017	Potharlapally Narmada vs Vs	27 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/4/2023	Sanekella Balaiah vs Munnuru Madhavulu	27 Apr 2023	judgement	—
CC/337/2020	State of Telangana vs Nune Mallaiah	27 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/141/2023	Dasari Niranjan vs Tahsildar	26 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/622/2021	Smt. Vara Laxmi vs Smt. Hussainamma	26 Apr 2023	Order	—
CC/235/2015	P.S.Nagarkurnool vs Donthula Venkatesh	25 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/104/2023	Smt. Mangi Venkatamma vs Vsto whomsoever concerned	24 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/192/2022	Smt. Malekadi Sushmitha vs Mangalagiri Baloji @ Katika Baloji	24 Apr 2023	Order	—
OS/179/2016	Pushpaleela vs S Venkat Reddy	20 Apr 2023	Order	—
OS/456/2022	Chennamoni Parvathalu vs Chennamoni Nagamma	20 Apr 2023	Order	—
OS/464/2021	Rettala Shankar Goud vs Rettala Narsamma	20 Apr 2023	Order	—
CC/829/2021	State of Telangana vs Yerrolla Babu	20 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/516/2021	Ailla Parandamulu Goud vs Ailla Mallesh Goud	19 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/42/2022	Emmadi Shetty Ramulu vs Smt.Gorla suvarna	18 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/232/2021	K. Srisailam vs K. Ballingaiah	18 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
CC/287/2016	V. Ramesh vs M. Venkat swamy	18 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/69/2023	Gurrala Chandrakala vs Vsto whom so ever it concerned	17 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/232/2021	K. Srisailam vs K. Ballingaiah	17 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/256/2020	G. Venu gopal reddy vs Sandhapuram Raju	17 Apr 2023	judgement	—
OS/13/2023	Rajagani Yadaiah vs To whom so ever concerned	13 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/649/2022	Sri. Shaik Yousuf Miya vs To whom so ever concerned	13 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/676/2022	Eedgi Nagana Goud vs Panakani Subbaiah	13 Apr 2023	Order	—
OS/268/2017	S. Devemder reddy vs S. Narender reddy	13 Apr 2023	judgement	—
CC/18/2023	Kondamoni Jayamma vs Kondamoni Raju	13 Apr 2023	order	Acquitted
CC/305/2022	Atinarapu Vishnu Sagar vs Chilka Parvathaiah	13 Apr 2023	judgement	—
CC/266/2016	Kathe Anitha vs Paladugu Kumar @ Bala kumar	12 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/174/2022	Taduri Arundathi @ Alivelu vs Dosawada vasudev and others	12 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/578/2022	Jalam Nagamma @ Thirupathamma vs Animoni Mangamma	11 Apr 2023	Order	—
CC/7/2023	State of Telangana of police nagarkurnool vs Vskandula sathynrayana	11 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
MC/2/2023	Dandugula Swapna vs Paspula Shivakumar	11 Apr 2023	Order	—
OS/133/2018	R.Yadiah vs Narsing Mallaiah	11 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/119/2020	SYed Mubasher vs R.Bheelya	07 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/606/2021	T.Prabhavathi w/o Late Thirupathi Reddy vs T.Pentamma w/o T.Nagi Reddy	07 Apr 2023	Judgement	—
OS/84/2022	NEELA PARVATHALU vs KURVA CHINNA NEELA BASWAIAH	29 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/272/2018	Chakali Parvathulu vs Mangali Bheemaiah	29 Mar 2023	Order	—
CC/443/2014	PS Nagarkurnool vs Vaddi Chinna Reddy	29 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
CC/279/2022	State of Telangana vs Vemula Ramanjaneyulu	28 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
CC/478/2022	State of Telangana OF POLICE Telkapally vs Naramoni Mallesh	28 Mar 2023	judgement	—
OS/144/2020	Sudini Anjan Reddy vs Sudini Alivelamma	28 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/104/2013	State Bank of India-ADB-Nagarkurnool vs A.Gopala Krishna	27 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/749/2022	The State Bank of India, Telkapally, Rep by its Branch Manager vs Gaddam Srikanth	27 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/750/2022	The State Bank of India, Telkapally branch rep by its branch manager vs Gaddam Srikanth	27 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/92/2021	Smt.Bukka Pentamma w/o Narayana vs Smt.Pasupula Sugunamma w/o Pasupula Krishnaiah	24 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/749/2022	The State Bank of India, Telkapally, Rep by its Branch Manager vs Gaddam Srikanth	23 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/750/2022	The State Bank of India, Telkapally branch rep by its branch manager vs Gaddam Srikanth	23 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/426/2022	Kesani Linga Rao vs Kadem Nagulu	21 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/539/2022	Alakunta Kavitha vs Chetamoni Arjunaiah	21 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/547/2022	Smt. Uppuganti Thirupatamma vs Sangisetty Shekar	21 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/711/2022	Pariki Umadevi vs Beeram Yadagiri reddy	21 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
DVC/8/2019	Chenchati Sathyamma vs Chenchati Ramulu	21 Mar 2023	Order	—
OS/536/2022	Sri. Singaraju Chakali Ushanna vs To whom so ever concerned	20 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/553/2021	K. Sugunamma vs Kondamoni Renuka	20 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
PRC/4/2023	State of Telangana vs Ushanna Midde	20 Mar 2023	Order	—
PRC/6/2022	State of Telangana OF POLICE NAGARKURNOOL vs T KURMAIAH	20 Mar 2023	Order	—
OS/246/2017	Satharapu Madhavareddy vs Mangali Venktesham	20 Mar 2023	order	—
OS/200/2020	Guddeti Bharathamma W/o Balakistaiah vs G. Krishnavani W/o Balaiah	17 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/376/2021	M.Srilatha wo Anjaneyulu vs Damarla Thirupathaiah s/o Ramulaiah	17 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/379/2022	Gummalla Venkat Reddy vs Gundlpally Yadamma and others	17 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/459/2021	Nervetla Renuka vs Mekala Sunitha	15 Mar 2023	Order	—
CC/64/2022	State of Telangana of Police Nagarkurnool vs Madrasu Sai Kumar	15 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/23/2023	Dubbolla Chinna Balaiah vs Dubbolla Eshwaramma	14 Mar 2023	AWARD COPY	—
OS/185/2022	Sirisha vs Girija	14 Mar 2023	AWARD COPY	—
DVC/7/2022	Shakira Begum vs Mohammed Yousuf	14 Mar 2023	Order	—
MC/21/2022	Shakira Begum vs Mohammed Yousuf	14 Mar 2023	Order	—
OS/633/2021	G.Srinivaulu vs A.Sridhar Reddy s/o Raghuma Reddy	10 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
CC/220/2021	State of Telangana vs Sevakula Saiprakash	10 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
PRC/26/2022	Darla Ramachandraiah S/o Chennaiah vs Chinthakuntla Padma w/o Laxmaiah	10 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/555/2022	Mudavath Gopal vs Kethavath Valiya	08 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/349/2020	Vadde Alivela vs Vadde Venkataiah	08 Mar 2023	judgement	—
OS/265/2022	Sri.Gaddamedi Venkataiah @ Venkatesh vs Sri. Gaddamedi Shanthaiah	06 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/568/2022	Dendi Paramdama Reddy vs Ityala Sai Babu	06 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
CC/153/2017	Teegala Shiva Kumar vs Teegala Sai kumar	06 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
PRC/1/2023	Palle Niranjanamma vs Gaddi Maibus @ Gadde Myboos	06 Mar 2023	Order	—
CC/173/2017	PS Tadur, Koukuntla Krishnaiah Goud vs Koukuntla Ravinder Goud	06 Mar 2023	judgement	—
OS/38/2022	Yemakanti Thirupathaiah vs The superintending engineer electrical	03 Mar 2023	JUDGEMENT	—
CC/535/2018	Vennu Kashinath vs Karvan Sandeep	03 Mar 2023	JUDGEMENT	Acquitted
OS/70/2022	U.Jayasimha Reddy vs M.Balaswamy	03 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/243/2019	Sri.K.Ravi branch manager State bank of India vs Sugoor Bramhaiah s/o Mallaiah	03 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/433/2021	Jampula Venaktaiah s/o Late Hanumanthu vs Jampula Jangaiah s/o Late Hanumanthu	03 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/433/2022	Bojja Krishna Reddy s/o Venkat Reddy vs Vadde Anjanamma and others	03 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
OS/742/2021	Settypally Bhagyalaxmi vs K.Pandu	03 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
CC/873/2021	State of Telangana vs Mandula Sai Kumar	03 Mar 2023	Judgement	—
PRC/25/2022	State of Telangana vs Katikam Parvathalu Goud	03 Mar 2023	Order	—

Showing 100 of 1,726 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

May 2023		1
Apr 2023		54
Mar 2023		53
Feb 2023		219
Jan 2023		47
Dec 2022		42
Nov 2022		166
Oct 2022		48
Sep 2022		84
Aug 2022		94
Jul 2022		45
Jun 2022		55

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Ms Swarupa Kaatam handled?

Ms Swarupa Kaatam has handled 1754 court orders since 2021 at Achampet, JCJ Court Complex. The average disposal rate is 69 orders per month.

What types of cases does Ms Swarupa Kaatam hear?

Based on available records, Ms Swarupa Kaatam primarily handles Criminal matters (Criminal Cases) and Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) at Achampet, JCJ Court Complex.

Where is Ms Swarupa Kaatam currently posted?

Ms Swarupa Kaatam is posted as Junior Civil Judge at Achampet, JCJ Court Complex, Nagarkurnool, Telangana.

Are judgments by Ms Swarupa Kaatam available online?

Yes. 16 judgments by Ms Swarupa Kaatam are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Ms Swarupa Kaatam dispose cases?

Ms Swarupa Kaatam disposes approximately 69 cases per month, based on 1754 orders handled over their tenure at Achampet, JCJ Court Complex.

Since when is Ms Swarupa Kaatam serving?

Ms Swarupa Kaatam has been serving at Achampet, JCJ Court Complex since 2021.

Case Types

CC 49%

OS 39%

MC 4%

PRC 3%

STC 3%

DVC 1%

EP 0%

ELECOP 0%

Posting History

Jan 2023 — Mar 2023

Junior Civil Judge · 55 orders
Aug 2022 — May 2023

I Addl JCJ cum JMFC Mobile Judge · 91 orders
Aug 2022 — May 2023

prl. Junior Civil Judge · 217 orders
Jul 2022 — Sep 2022

II Addl JCJ cum JMFC · 19 orders
Oct 2021 — Apr 2022

II Addl JCJ cum JMFC · 18 orders
Oct 2021 — Apr 2022

I Addl JCJ cum JMFC Mobile Judge · 72 orders
Oct 2021 — Apr 2022

Prl JCJ cum JMFC · 126 orders
Oct 2021 — Apr 2022

I Addl JCJ cum JMFC · 25 orders
Oct 2021 — Apr 2022

II Addl JCJ cum JMFC · 61 orders
Jan 2021 — May 2023

Prl JCJ cum JMFC · 1,070 orders

Outcomes on Record

Acquitted 4

Convicted 3

Compromised 2

Other Judges at this Court

Kum Goolla Spandana

Junior Civil Judge

545 orders

← View all judges at Achampet, JCJ Court Complex