1 OF 16 S.C.NO.1145 OF 2019
IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL SESSIONS JUDGE FOR TRIAL AND DISPOSAL
OF THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT
CASES, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT AT L.B. NAGAR.
Wednesday, the 16thday of July, 2025
Present: Smt. T. Jayalakshmi, X Additional District and Sessions Judge Ranga Reddy District, at L.B.Nagar, FAC: Special Sessions Judge for Trial and Disposal of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act cases, R.R.District at L.B.Nagar
Sessions Case No. 1145 of 2019
(Cr.No.240 of 2018 of P.S Abdullapurmet)
1.Name and description of theThe State of Telangana, represented by the complainantInspector of Police, Abdullapurmet Police Station.
2.Name and description of theA1. Pakanati Padmamma @ Padma, W/o. accusedLate Bixapathi, age 65 years, Occ: House hold, R/o. H.No. 5-69, Abdullapurmet village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distict.
A2. Pakanati Savithri, W/o. Sambaiah, age 30 years, Occ: House wife, R/o. H.No. 5-69, Abdullapurmet village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distict.
A3. Are Achamma, W/o. Narsimhulu, age 42 years, Occ: Labour, R/o. Near Komati Cheruvu, Siddipet town and District.
A4. Kamsani Anjali, W/o. Rajesham, age 23 years, Occ: Tailoring, R/o. Mahalaxmi Veedhi, Vemulawada, Karimnagar District.
A5. Kamsani Shobha, W/o. Yellaiah, age 36 years, Occ: Labour, R/o. H.No. 4-163, Ganeshnagar, Yadagirigutta, Yadadri District.
A6. Bunadri Sandhya @ Rekha, W/o. Yadagiri, age 26 years, Occ: Tailor, R/o. Japtu Shunur village, Narsing Mandal, Medak 2 OF 16 S.C.NO.1145 OF 2019
District, N/o. H.No. 3-7-67, Shair Bangla, Nalgonda.
A7. Kamsani Anjamma, W/o. Late Narsimhulu, age 58 years, Occ: Labour, R/o. H.No. 1-4-73, Pragathinagar, Bhongir, Yadadri District
3.Offences chargedUnder sections 370, 370A, 373, 323 of IPC and U/s. 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 of PITA Act, U/s. 17 of POCSO Act and U/s. 75 and 81 of JJ Act against A1.
Under section 323 of IPC and U/s. 3, 4, 6 & 7 of PITA Act, U/s. 17 of POCSO Act and U/s. 75 of JJ Act against A2.
Under Sections 370, 370A of IPC and Sections 3, 4, 6 & 7 of PITA Act, section 17 of of POCSO Act and Under Section 75 of JJ Act against A3 to A7
4.Plea of the accusedPleaded not guilty.
5.Finding of the CourtFound not guilty
6.Conviction, sentence or acquittal IN THE RESULT, Accused no.1 is found not guilty for the offences punishable Under Sections 370, 370A, 373, 323 of IPC and U/s. 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 of PITA Act, U/s. 17 of POCSO Act and U/s. 75 and 81 of JJ Act and accused No.2 is not found guilty for the offences punishable Under Section 323 of IPC and U/s. 3, 4, 6 & 7 of PITA Act, U/s. 17 of POCSO Act and U/s. 75 of JJ Act and Accused Nos.3 to A7 are found not guilty for the offence punishable Under Sections 370, 370A of IPC and Sections 3, 4, 6 & 7 of PITA Act, section 17 of of POCSO Act and Under Section 75 of Juvenile Justice Act and accordingly, they are acquitted under Section 235(1) Cr.P.C for the said offences. The bonds and bail bonds of accused nos.1 to 7 shall remain in force for (6) months as provided under Section 437-A of Code of Criminal Procedure.
3 OF 16 S.C.NO.1145 OF 2019
M.O.1 to M.O.4 shall be confiscated to the State after appeal time is over. M.O.5 to M.O.13 shall be destroyed after appeal time is over.
7.Name of the Counsel for theSri. P.Satyanarayana, Addl. P.P prosecution
8.Name of the Counsel for accused Sri. Ishaq Nehal, Advocate
This case is coming on for final hearing on 15.07.2025 before me in the presence of Sri P. Satyanarayana, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State/Complainant and of Sri. Ishaq Nehal, Learned Counsel for the accused nos.1 to 7; upon hearing arguments, upon considering the material evidence on record and having stood over for consideration till this day, the Court delivered the following:
:: J U D G M E N T ::
1.The Inspector of Police, Abdullapurmet Police Station, has filed charge sheet in Cr.No.240 of 2018 for offences punishable under sections 370, 370A, 373, 323 of IPC and U/s. 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 of PITA Act, U/s. 17 of POCSO Act and
U/s. 75 and 81 of JJ Act against A1. Andoffences punishable under Section 323 of IPC and U/s. 3, 4, 6 & 7 of PITA Act, U/s. 17 of POCSO Act and U/s. 75 of JJ
Act against A2. And offences punishable under Sections 370, 370A of IPC and
Sections 3, 4, 6 & 7 of PITA Act, section 17 of of POCSO Act and Under Section 75 of JJ Act against A3 to A7.
2.The brief facts of the case of the prosecution are as follows:
(i)That on 09-08-2018 at 09.00 hrs received a complaint from victim/Kum. Vutti @Vattikonda Nirmala, D/o Gopi, age 16-17 yrs, R/o Raja
Rajeshwaripeta, Vijayawada, present R/o H-No. 17-21-29. Khuddus Nagar, Yerra
Katta, Kedareswarapeta, Vijayawada, in which she stated that they had four 4 OF 16 S.C.NO.1145 OF 2019 children to their parents i.e. two sons and two daughters. She was studied up to 8th class in the year 2008, at Kappalabadi School. Due to financial problems she was worked in a Sarkar Bar, at that time, her mother's friend Laxmi who used to work in said bar makes contact with her and later Laxmi daughter Pavithra makes contact with her and became close friends. After that, Pavithra advised her, if she will come with her, she will give money to her. On believing her version, about when she was age of 11 years, she came to one Padma/A1 house at
Abdullapurmet along with Pavithra. After two to three days said Pavithra went from there and didn't return and subsequently, she came to know that she was sold out. She was looked well for two days by Padmamma/A1 and her daughter in law Savithri/A2, then they started harassing her to do entrusted works and beat her. Then Padmamma/A1 taken her to the house one Rekha at Seenuru village of
Ramayampet mandal, where they directed her to stand beside road and take customers to her house and forced her to participate sexual intercourse with them daily about 10-15 members without her consent. After two months, said Padma taken her to his sister Achamma/A3 house at Siddipeta, where also they used to harass her to participate sexual intercourse with customers without her consent.
Then taken her to Padmamma elder daughter Anjali/A4 house at Vemulawada, where she was kept for 3 months to do prostitution. After that, she was taken to
Padmamma elder sister Anjamma/A7 house at Bhongir, where, as per their instructions she did prostitution for 2 months. Then she was taken to Padmamma step daughter Shobha/A5 house at Yadagirigutta and she did prostitution for one month as per their instructions. Then she was taken to Alair, Dharmapuri and other places in order to do prostitution with her and as per their directions, she 5 OF 16 S.C.NO.1145 OF 2019 used to participate sexual intercourse with 10 to 15 members without her consent daily, if she refused to do the same, as she was suffering from ill health,
Padmamma/A1 and Savithri/A2 used to beat her with belt and then they forced her to drink alcohol and sent her to male customers and didn't give money or articles to her. She was waiting for opportunity to see her parents. On 09-08-2018 she was escaped from their house at Abdullapurmet and came to Police Station
Abdullapurmet. Thus, the above said persons induced the minor girl and kidnapped her from lawful guardianship of her parents, then forced her to do prostitution and thereby living on the earnings of prostitution, for which they bought her and then Padma/A1 and Savithri/A2 taken her to different places for doing prostitution with her and forced her to participate in sexual intercourse with customers, beat her and threatened her with dire consequences not to reveal to anyone. Hence, she requested to take necessary action.
ii)As per contents of the above complaint, the PW-21/Inspector of Police, has been registered a case in Cr No: 240/2018, U/s. 365, 366(A), 368, 370 (1) (D), 372, 373, 376 R/w 114 Indian Penal Code, Sec.17 of POCSO Act, Sec.75 & 81 of
JJ Act, 2015 and Sec. 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 of Immoral Trafficking (Prevention) Act and took up the investigation.
iii)During the course of investigation, as per the requisition of PW21, the PW- 20 Woman Inspector of Police, WPS Saroornagar has been examined and recorded the statement of PW-1 and then PW-21 has sent the requisition to PW- 18, for medical examination of PW-1, to rule out sexual assault, age determination certificate and any wounds on PW-1. The PW-18 examined and preserved opinion for FSL report and the PW-19/Dental Asst. Surgeon examined 6 OF 16 S.C.NO.1145 OF 2019 the PW-1 and issued age certificate that the age of PW-1 is 16-17 years. After that the PW-21 visited the scene of offence situated at H-No. 5-69, Abdullapurmet village & Mandal, R.R. Dist. where examined and recorded the statement of PWs- 2 & 5 and secured the presence of panch witnesses PWs-11 & 12 and conducted scene of offence panchanama and drafted rough sketch in their presence. After that, PW-1 was produced before the court with a request to send her to Prajwala
Rescue Home at Mankhal village, Maheshwaram mandal for shelter and rehabilitation and as per the orders of the VII Metropolitan Magistrate Court, vide
Dis. No. 2795/18, Dt: 10-08-2018 the PW-1 was lodged at Prawjala Rescue
Home under proper acknowledgment. After that the mother and brother of PW-1 are identified at Vijayawada i.e. PWs-3 & 4 and after seeing the PW-1, the PW-3 identified as her daughter. Later, examined and recorded the statements of PWs- 4 & 5. Then, PW-3 produced Aadhaar card of PW-1 which shows her date of birth is in the year 2002 and her surname is Vutti.
iv)During the course of investigation, on reliable information, on 11-08-2018 at 07:00 hrs, the accused persons A1, A2 & A6 are apprehended by the PW-21 with help of woman and men staff at Kothagudam, and brought them to Police
Station. On 28-08-2018 the accused No.3 & 4 were apprehended by the PW7 with the help of Woman Staff at the house of A3. On 29-08-2018 at 9:45 hours the accused Nos.5 & 7 themselves came to Police station and surrendered before the
PW21 and on questioning the accused persons and revealed their names and they admitted to have committed the offence and gave their confession statements. Upon which, the PW-21 secured panch witnesses PW's 13 to 16 and in their presence recorded the detailed confession statement of the accused 7 OF 16 S.C.NO.1145 OF 2019
Nos.1 to 7 and seized net cash of Rs.2000/- and I-ball cell phon from the possession of A1, and one Samsung cell phone from the possession of A2 and I- tell cell phone from A6 and also seized some tablets and condoms and one leather belt from the possession of A1 & A2 under cover of panchanama and duly affixed with the panch chits on seized property. PW21 filed requisition before the
LW26/Learned Metropolitan Magistrate to record Sec.164 Cr.P.C statement of the victim. On 14-08-2018, LW26 recorded Sec.164 Cr.P.C statement of PW1/victim.
During the course of investigation, PW21 sent the material objects to TSFSL and they issued report. On 27-06-2019 the deputed men and women staff apprehended the JCL who is aged about 14 years at the time of offence and produced her before the court for judicial remand. Thereby, the accused persons
A1 to A7 and JCL have been committed an offence punishable under Sections 365, 366(A), 368, 370 (1)(D), 372, 373, 376 r/w 114 of Indian Penal Code, Sec.
17 of POCSO Act, 2012, Sec.75 & 81 of JJ Act, 2015 and Sec. 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 of
Immoral Trafficking (Prevention) Act-1956. A separate charge sheet has been filed against the JCL before the II Metropolitan Magistrate Court – cum – Juvenile
Justice Court at L.B.Nagar.
3.The Hon'ble Metropolitan Sessions Judge, R.R.District at L.B.Nagar took cognizance for the offences punishable under sections 365, 366(A), 368, 370 (1) (D), 372, 373, 376 r/w 114 of Indian Penal Code, Sec. 17 of POCSO Act, 2012,
Sec.75 & 81 of JJ Act, 2015 and Sec. 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 of Immoral Trafficking (Prevention) Act-1956 against the accused persons and registered as SC.No.
1145 of 2019 and issued summons to Accused persons. On appearance of
Accused nos. 1 to 7 case copies were furnished to them under sections 207 8 OF 16 S.C.NO.1145 OF 2019
Cr.P.C. By virtue of order Dt. 06-09-2021 vide Dis.No.4942/2021 Hon’ble
Metropolitan Sessions Judge, R.R.District at L.B.Nagar made over this case to this court for trial and disposal.
4.The accused No.1 to 7 were examined under Section 228(2) of Code of
Criminal Procedure. After hearing the Additional Public Prosecutor and the
Counsel representing the accused Nos.1 to 7, charges under Sections 370, 370A, 373, 323 of IPC and U/s. 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 of PITA Act, U/s. 17 of POCSO Act and
U/s. 75 and 81 of JJ Act against A1. And charges under Section 323 of IPC and
U/s. 3, 4, 6 & 7 of PITA Act, U/s. 17 of POCSO Act and U/s. 75 of JJ Act against
A2. And charges under Sections 3370, 370A of IPC and Sections 3, 4, 6 & 7 of
PITA Act, section 17 of of POCSO Act and Under Section 75 of JJ Act against A3 to A7, were framed, read over and explained to them in vernacular language, for which they denied the said charges, pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.
5.In order to prove case of the prosecution, the prosecution got examined
PWs 1 to 22 and got marked Exs.P1 to P55 and M.O.1 to M.O.13.
6.After conclusion of the trial, accused nos.1 to 7 were examined under
Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with reference to the incriminating material appearing against them in the evidence of prosecution witnesses. They denied the evidence. They did not choose to adduce any evidence either oral or documentary.
7.Heard both sides. Perused the record.
9 OF 16 S.C.NO.1145 OF 2019
8.Now, the point for determination is:
“Whether the prosecution could able to bring home the guilt for the offences punishable under Sections 370, 370A, 373, 323 of IPC and U/s. 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 of PITA Act, U/s. 17 of POCSO Act and U/s. 75 and 81 of JJ Act. against the accused no.1 and for the offences punishable under Section 323 of IPC and U/s. 3, 4, 6 & 7 of PITA Act, U/s. 17 of POCSO Act and U/s. 75 of JJ Act against accused no.2, for the offences punishable under Sections 370, 370A of IPC and Sections 3, 4, 6 & 7 of ‘PIT’ Act, Under section 17 of of the POCSO Act and Under Section 75 of JJ Act against the accused Nos.3 to 7and beyond all reasonable doubt”?
9. POINT:The case of the prosecution is that A1 took rented house at
Yadagirigutta where A1 used to run prostitution business with PW-1 for one year and after came to know police raidings at Yadagirigutta, A1 was taken
PW-1 to the house of A3 at Komati Cheruvu, Siddipet, there also they used to harass PW-1 to participate sexual intercourse with customers without her consent and shared amount equally by A1 & A3 and after 3-4 months A1 was taken PW-1 to house of A4 at Vemulawada, where PW-1 was kept for 4-5 months and did prostitution business with PW-1 without her consent. After that
A1 was taken PW1 to house of A7 at Bhongir, where, as per their instructions
PW-1 did prostitution for 2 months. Then, A1 was taken to Pedda Kandukur of
Yadagirigutta and did prostitution with PW-1 for 3-4 months in a rented house.
Then A1 was taken to PW-1 to Alair, Dharmapuri and did prostitution with PW- 1 in rented houses and as per the directions of A1, PW-1 daily used to participate sexual intercourse with 10 to 15 members without her consent. If
PW-1 refused to do the same, as she was suffering from ill health, A1 & A2 10 OF 16 S.C.NO.1145 OF 2019 used to beat her and forced her to drink alcohol and sent her to male customers, they didn't give money or articles to PW-1. Due to recent raidings at Yadagirigutta, A1 brought the PW-1 her house at Abdullapurmet. On 09-08- 2018 without knowledge of A1 & A2, PW-1 escaped from their house. Thus, the accused persons induced the minor girl and kidnapped her from lawful guardianship of her parents, then forced her to do prostitution and thereby living on the earnings of prostitution, for which they bought her and then the A1 taken the PW-1 to different places for doing prostitution with her and forced her to participate in sexual intercourse with customers and A1, A2 beat the
PW-1, and threatened her with dire consequences not to reveal to anyone and meanwhile, PW21 along with his staff apprehended accused Nos.1 to 7 and recorded the confession of accused nos.1 to 7 and seized mobile phones, cash, tablets and condoms from the possession of accused nos.1, 2 & 6 under the cover of confession cum seizure panchanama.
10.To substantiate its case, the prosecution has examined PWs 1 to 22 and
Exs.P1 to P55 and M.O.1 to M.O.13 were marked. On behalf of the defence, no evidence was adduced and no documents were marked.
11. Now coming to the appreciation of evidence, PW1, who is the victim in this case did not support the prosecution case and even she went to the extent that accused no.1 to 7 did not induce her to do prostitution at any point of time. PW3 who is mother of the victim and PW4, who is brother of the victim, also not supported the prosecution case. PW2 and PWs.6 to 10 who are neighbors of 11 OF 16 S.C.NO.1145 OF 2019
Accused No.1 to 7 did not support the prosecution case. PWs.11 & 12 who are panch witnesses for scene of offence panchanama did not support the prosecution case.
12. The crucial witnesses i.e. Pws.13 to PW17 who are the panchas for confession of accused nos.1 to 7 cum seizure panchanama also not supported the prosecution case and they stated that they did not attend any proceedings of panchanama and police did not seize anything in their presence.
13.PW18 is the medical officer, who examined the victim i.e., conducted preliminary examination of the victim and collected material objects from the victim such as cervical swabs and smear, vaginal swabs, pubic hair and nail clippings. She issued Ex.P45 and subsequently after issuance of FSL report i.e.,
Ex.P46, she again issued final opinion i.e., Ex.P47 in this case, as per her evidence she opined that “the possibility of rape cannot be ruled out”.
14.PW19 who is Dental Assistant Surgeon, who conducted age determination test of the victim and gave report that the victim was aged between 16-17 years of age, but the medical evidence was not supported by any independent evidence.
PW20 is the Women Inspector of Police, who recorded the 161 Cr.P.C statement of the victim.
15.PW21 is the investigation officer, deposed about receiving complaint from
PW1 and recording the statement of the witnesses and recording the confession statements, of accused persons and seized material i.e. M.O.1 to M.O.13 and 12 OF 16 S.C.NO.1145 OF 2019 arrested the accused No.1 to 7 with the help of police personnel, registration of
FIR and investigation. PW22 is also the investigation officer, he took up the investigation from PW21 and he verified the investigation done by PW21 and himself and he filed charge sheet, but their evidence was not supported by any independent evidence and even the mother and brother of the victim did not support the prosecution case and moreover, the circumstances also not established.
16.Since, the victim/PW1 and her mother and brother did not support the case of the prosecution, the Court closed the evidence of the other witnesses i.e., LWs 9, 12, 20, 21 and 26, even if they are examined, there would not have been any improvement in the case of the prosecution.
17.In this case, the prosecution utterly failed to establish that PW1/victim was subjected to the allegations leveled against the accused persons, hence question of granting any compensation to PW1/victim does not arise. In the light of the above evidence and considering the circumstances placed by the prosecution as none of the witnesses and confession panch also not supported the case of the prosecution and in the absence of any clear and cogent evidence, this Court is of the opinion that the prosecution has failed to prove the guilt of accused Nos.1 to 7 with which they were charged. Hence, accused nos.1 to 7 are entitled to benefit of doubt and they are entitled to be acquitted.
Hence, this point is answered accordingly.
13 OF 16 S.C.NO.1145 OF 2019
18. IN THE RESULT, Accused no.1 is found not guilty for the offences punishable Under Sections 370, 370A, 373, 323 of IPC and U/s. 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 of
PITA Act, U/s. 17 of POCSO Act and U/s. 75 and 81 of JJ Act and accused No.2 is not found guilty for the offences punishable Under Section 323 of IPC and U/s.
3, 4, 6 & 7 of PITA Act, U/s. 17 of POCSO Act and U/s. 75 of JJ Act and Accused
Nos.3 to A7 are found not guilty for the offence punishable Under Sections 370, 370A of IPC and Sections 3, 4, 6 & 7 of PITA Act, section 17 of of POCSO Act and Under Section 75 of Juvenile Justice Act and accordingly, they are acquitted under Section 235(1) Cr.P.C for the said offences. The bonds and bail bonds of accused nos.1 to 7 shall remain in force for (6) months as provided under Section 437-A of Code of Criminal Procedure. M.O.1 to M.O.4 shall be confiscated to the
State after appeal time is over. M.O.5 to M.O.13 shall be destroyed after appeal time is over.
(Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 16th day of July, 2025)
X Addl. District, & Sessions Judge Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar. FAC Special Sessions Judge for Trial and Disposal of POCSO Act cases, R.R.District at L.B.Nagar 14 OF 16 S.C.NO.1145 OF 2019
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
WITNESSES EXAMINED
FOR PROSECUTION: FOR DEFENCE:
PW1 -Victim NONE PW2 -Hanumanthu PW3 -Mother of victim PW4 -Brother of victim PW5 -A. Buchi Narayana PW6 -Aare Raju PW7 -Chandha Saritha PW8 -K. Madhavi PW9 -Mekala Radha PW10 -Mekala Swamy PW11 -Achini Mahesh PW12 -K. Ramesh PW13 -B. Mahender Goud PW14 -Mohd. Ghouse PW15 -Konda Mallesh PW16 -R. Krishna Reddy PW17 -M. Prabhakar PW18 -Dr. Jyothi PW19 -Dr. D. Manish PW20 -G. Manjula PW21 -M. Muni/Investigation Officer PW22 -S. Devender/Investigation Officer
EXHIBITS MARKED
FOR PROSECUTION:
Ex.P1 is the Signature of PW1 on report Ex.P2 is the 161 Cr.P.C statement of PW1 Ex.P3 to Ex.P5 are the signatures of PW1 on 164 Cr.P.C statement. Ex.P6 is the 161 Cr.P.C statement of PW2 Ex.P7 is the 161 Cr.P.C statement of PW3 Ex.P8 is the 161 Cr.P.C statement of PW4 Ex.P9 is the 161 Cr.P.C statement of PW5 Ex.P10 is the 161 Cr.P.C statement of PW6 Ex.P11 is the 161 Cr.P.C statement of PW7 Ex.P12 is the 161 Cr.P.C statement of PW8 15 OF 16 S.C.NO.1145 OF 2019
Ex.P13 is the 161 Cr.P.C statement of PW9 Ex.P14 is the 161 Cr.P.C statement of PW10 Ex.P15 is the signature of PW11 on Crime Detail Form Ex.P16 is the signature of PW12 on Crime Detail Form Ex.P17 to P19 Signature of PW13 on confession proceedings of A1 Ex.P20 to P21 Signature of PW13 on confession proceedings of A2 Ex.P22 to P24 Signature of PW13 on confession proceedings of A6 Ex.P25 to P27 Signature of PW14 on confession proceedings of A1 Ex.P28 to P29 Signature of PW14 on confession proceedings of A2 Ex.P30 to P32 Signature of PW14 on confession proceedings of A6 Ex.P33 to P36 Signature of PW15 on confession panchanama of A3 & A4 Ex.P37 to P40 Signature of PW16 on confession panchanama of A3 & A4 Ex.P41 to P42 Signature of PW17 on confession proceedings of A5 Ex.P43 to P44 Signature of PW17 on confession proceedings of A7 Ex.P45 is the Preliminary Examination Report Ex.P46 is the FSL Report Ex.P47 is the Final Report Ex.P48 is the Age Certificate Ex.P49 is the Complaint Ex.P50 is the Original FIR Ex.P51 is the Crime Detail Form Ex.P52 is the relevant portion in confession cum seizure panchanama of A1 Ex.P53 is the relevant portion in confession cum seizure panchanama of A2 Ex.P54 is the relevant portion in confession cum seizure panchanama of A6 Ex.P55 is the Seizure Report Dt. 11-08-2018.
FOR DEFENCE: NIL
MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED:
M.O.1 is I- ball Cell Phone M.O.2 is Cash of Rs.2000/- M.O.3 is Samsung Cell Phone M.O.4 is I-tell Cell Phone M.O.5 is Multivitamin & multimineral sfotgels tables (Nea-o N-Vit sheet (total 10 tablets) M.O.6 is Neurovit SG- one sheet ( 10 tablets) M.O.7 is O-Pill-1 M.O.8 is Nloz-B400 tablets – 2 sheets M.O.9 is Ezee-72-3 Tablets (2 sheets) 16 OF 16 S.C.NO.1145 OF 2019
M.O.10 is Manforce (Green Apple flaboured condoms-3 boxes (Each box 3 condoms) M.O.11 is Manforce condoms (Strawberry flavoured-2 boxed (Each box 3 condoms) M.O.12 is Kamasutra condoms (orgasmax-1 Box (Each box 3 condoms) M.O.13 is One leather belt
X Addl. District, & Sessions Judge Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar. FAC Special Sessions Judge for Trial and Disposal
of POCSO Act cases, R.R.District at L.B.Nagar