Smt.V.Pushpalatha

1of19S.C.No.26of 2023

THESPL.SESSIONSJUDGE,FASTTRACK

IN THECOURTOF

EXPEDITIOUSTRIALANDDISPOSALOFRAPE

SPECIALCOURTFOR

POCSOCASESATRAJANNASIRCILLA.

AND

PRESENT:B.PUSHPALATHA, | ADDL.SESSIONSJUDGE,

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

FAC:Spl.SessionsJudge,

for ExpeditiousTrial FTSCourt& of RapeandPOCSOActCases,

Disposal

RajannaSircilla.

7" day of November,2025 Friday,thisthe

SESSIONSCASE(POCSO)NO.26OF2023

"Nameofthe complainant[:: [TheState

Police ;

throughSubDivisional

|Officer,of:

Sircilla(CrimeNo.39of2023 j

PS:Sircilla).

'Siddirala @ ChiduralaVishnu,Slo Raju,

Description.

of theaccused Caste:Padmashali, Aged:19years, ‘Occu:R/oB.Y. Nagar,Sircilla, Salesman, ‘nowBlockNo.24,RoomNo.9,KCR, at

_—

'Nagar,Mandepallivillage—of

‘Thangallapalli

of RajannaSircilla! Mandal

jDistrict.

‘UnderSections366-A,376(2)(n),493,;

~ ‘Charges:

of |

[4965(1)r/w6(1)

ofI.P.CandSection ofChildrenfromSexual: Protection

||Offences

Act,2012.

‘Pleaofthe accused,[Not

guilty.

‘Notguilty.

Endingofthe Court

1 | F

Fair

2 of19S.C.No.26of 2023

Too-mo

‘The accused isnotguiltyfor the.

Sentenceorderfound or

offencespunishable

underSections: !

I.P.C and:

|366-A,376(2)(n),493,496of

Section5(1)rw6(1)ofProtectionof:

ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct,2012 andaccordingly,heisacquittedunder,

Section235(1)Cr.P.C.Thebailbonds andsuretybondsoftheaccusedshall a period of six remainin forceformonths fromtodaySection437-ACr.P.C. asper

|Prosecution

conductedbySriPentaSrinivas, : Spl.PublicProsecutor.

DefenceconductedbySriV.Sadanandam,

Advocatefor theaccused.

is coming before

This04.11.2025forfinalhearing casemeon in theof SriPentaSrinivas,Spl.PublicProsecutorfor theState presence andofSriV.Sadanandam,Advocatefortheaccused,perusingthe upon materialrecord,hearingtheandthe papersonuponargumentsmatter havingstoodforconsiderationtillthisday,thedeliveredthe overCourt

following:

DGMENT

1)TheSubDivisionalPoliceOfficer,Sircillafiled charge hassheet againsttheaccusedin CrimeNo.39of2023fortheoffencespunishable

(faderSections363,376(2)(n), 493,of I.P.C5(1)rAw6(1)

496andSection

%.

bv

Fair3 of19S.C.No.26of 2023 ofProtectionof ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct,2012of SircillaPolice

Station.

2.01)brieffactsofthethat28.01.2023at0830 Thecaseareon.

defacto-complainant/L.W.1/motherof victimgirl/L.W.3/xxxlodged

hours,the of Sundaraiahnagar,and complaintstatingthatsheisresidentSircilla a herlivelihoodby rollingbeedies.Sheblessedwithsole eking-outwas about0900hours,hevictimdaughter/L.W.3/ daughter.On27.01.2023at till evening. college,butshedidreturntohomeShe wenttonot xxx daughter,butin-vain.Sheexpressedsuspicionthe searchedforherover accused.

theabovecomplaint,theL.W.18/B.CheenaNayak,

2.02)Basing

on of Police,Sircillahasregisteredin CrimeNo.39of SubInspectoracase

Sectionandtook-up investigation.Duringthe

2023under363I.P.Ccourse

L.W.18flashedR/Msandlook-outnoticetoallthe

ofinvestigation,

L.W.18visitedtheof offencesituatedat concernedofficers.Later,scene its surroundings Sircilla,observedtheof crimeand Sundaraiahnagar,scene its detailsin crimedetailsformin theof L.W.11/ andincorporatedpresence

SamataSanthoshandL.W.12/DubalaSanthosh.

hours,theparentsof victimproduced

2.03)On30.01.2023at2130

Fair4of19S.C.No.26of 2023

SakhiCenter,Sircilla.On31.01.2023,L.W.18gotrecordedthe statement of victimgirl/L.W.3 throughL.W.6/D.Navatha,W.S.|SakhiCenter,Sircilla at undervideographywiththehelpofL.W.7/KamarapuVenu.L.W.18 collectedofdateofbirthcertificateofthevictimgirl,whereinit copy disclosedthatthedateof birthof thevictimgirlis 18.08.2006andheris age

09 days

1605monthsandatthetimeof offence.Accordingthe yearsto statementofvictimgirlandherdateofbirth,L.W.18alteredthe asper sectionof lawfromSection3631.P.CtoSections376(2)(n),493,496LP.C

5(1)r/w6(1)of

andSectionProtectionof ChildrenfromSexualOffences

Act,2012.

2.04)Subsequently,L.W.19/A.ViswaPrasad,SubDivisionalPolice

Officer, Sircilla, took-up furtherinvestigation,

verifiedtheinvestigationdone byL.W.18andfoundit oncorrectlines.L.W.19proceededto first sceneof offence,observedtheofcrimeanditssurroundingsbutdid scenenot redrawit hadalreadybeendrawnup byL.W.18.referred asL.W.19the victimgirL.W.3/xxxteGovernmentDistrictHospital, Sircillatoconduct medicalexaminationthevictimgirlandfor onreport.—L.W.15/

Dr.D.Sushma,LadyMedicalOfficerconductedmedical examinationthe on victimgirlandpreservedmaterialobjects, i.e.,slidesof smear,

swab,pubic

Fair5 of19S.C.No.26of 2023 onwardtransmissionR.F.S.L.,Karimnagarfor hairandvaginalwashforto examinationandreport.

2.05)alongwithpanchwitnesses,ie.,

Subsequently,L.W.19

proceeded2™ scene L.W.13/AdepuNareshandL.W.14/EligetiBhaskarto

Raja RajeswaraSwamyTemple,observed

of offencesituatedSriLord near incorporatedits detailsin crimedetailsform.L.W.19 theof crimeand scene

L.W.8/KatlaMalleshamwhotothe securedtheofgaveroom presence examinedandrecordedhisstatement.Fromthere, accusedrentbasis, on proceededto 3"of offencesituated alongwithpanchasscene L.W.19same

at Sri Lord Raja Rajeswara Swamy Temple,observedthe3of crime

scene in crimedetailsform.Further,L.W.19secured andincorporatedits details of L.W.9/Sripathiwhototheaccused theSravangaveroomon presence basis,examinedandrecordedhisstatement. rent in progress,reliableinformation,L.W.19 2.06)Whileeffortson were

Mandepalii

andhisproceededtoK.C.R.Nagar, alongwithL.W.18men accusedhishouseatBlockNo.24,Room

villageandapprehendedtheat

villageofThangallapalliMandal

Nagar,Mandepallion

No.9,K.C.R.

1215 hoursand

interrogation,theaccusedconfessedto 02.02.2023aton

Fair

Gof19S.C.No.26of 2023

Station,Sircilla,effectedhisandhimGovernment arrestsenttoHospital, for conducting SircillapotencytestandforL.W.16/Dr.P,Raghu,

report.Duty

MedicalOfficerconductedmedicalexaminationtheaccusedandissued on

certificateopiningthatis impotency”.

potency“there

2.07)Subsequently,L.W.19thematerialobjects

senttoR.F.S.L.,

Karimnagarandreporthasbeenreceived,whereinit wasopinedthatitems 1, 2,3 and4examined,is detectedin item2, but aresemenspermatozoa is notdetected,andspermatozoadetectedin items1,3and semenarenot

4.Basingtheabovereport,L.W.15/Dr.D.Sushmaissued onherfinal opinionopiningthat“semenisdetectedin itemNo.2,but spermatozoais notdetectedandfinalopinion given‘consistentwithintercourse, asrecent possibilityofsexualassaultcouldberuled out’.Onrequisition, a

L.W.17/Smt.K.Sowjanya,JudicialMagistrateof FirstClass,

Sircillarecorded thestatementofvictimgirl/L.W.3/xunderSection 164CrP.C.L.W19 collecteddateofbirthcertificateofthevictimgirl/L.W.3/xxx from

L.W.10/P.Mallesham,HeadMaster,ZPHSchool,Venkampet,

Sircillaand as theschoolrecords,thedateof birthof thevictim pergirlis 18.08.2006and heris 1605months09 days ageyearsandandsheis minorthetime atof offence.

Cay

Sag

oy,

gr

Aon

7 of19S.C.No.26of 2023 2.08)Subsequently,L.W.19collectedCDRs,CAFsandcertificates underSection65-Bof IndianEvidenceActfromtheconcernedwhereinit is disclosedthattheaccusedcontactedthevictimgirl repeatedlyphone over andusedto talkwithher.

2.09)Theinvestigationestablishedthattheaccuseddevelopedill thevictimgirlandgot acquaintancewithherandusedtofoliow eyeover of loveandmarriageandthattheaccusedkidnappedthe herthepretext on minorvictimgirl27.01.2023andtookhertoVemulawadawherethe on

in Raja RajeswaraTemple,married

accusedtookrentSwamy aroomon

her by exchanging garlands

andstayedin roomfortwodays27.01.2023 on andduringthesaidperied,theaccusedcommitted and28.01.2023

aggravatedpenetrativesexualassaultthevictimgirl repeatedly.

on

2.10)of investigationcollectingrelevant

Aftercompletionandafter

L.W.19/A.ViswaPrasad,SubDivisionalPoliceOfficer,Sircilla, documents, againsttheaccusedfor theoffencesunderSections363, filedchargesheet andSection5(1)rw6(1)of Protectionof Children 376(2)(n),493,496I.P.C fromSexualOffencesAct,2012.Hence,thechargesheet.

caer

Fair8 ofof 2023 19S.C.No.26

3)Thelearned|Addl.SessionsJudge,RajannaSircillatook cognizancefortheoffencesunderSections363,376(2)(n),493,496of

rAv 6(1)

LP.CandSection5(1)ofProtectionofChildrenfromSexual

OffencesAct,2012againsttheaccused.Subsequently,this casewas

for disposal according

transferredto thisCourtto law.

4)Onof theaccusedandafterhearingbothsides, appearance thisCourtframedchargesunderSections366-A,376(2)(n),493,496of

L.P.CandSection5(2)rw6(1)ofProtectionofChildrenfromSexual

OffencesAct,2012againsttheaccused,readandexplainedtohimin over

Telugu.Hepleadednot guilty and

claimedto be tried.

5)Duringtheoftrial,P.Ws.1to5examinedand coursewere

Exs.P.1toP.16markedbehalfof theprosecution.Theevidenceof wereon

remainingwitnessesgiven-up bytheSpecialPublicProsecutorthe

wasas of prosecution. materialwitnessesdidnotsupportthe case

6)of prosecution Afterclosuresideevidence,theaccused was examinedunderSection313Cr.P.Cinrespectofincriminating circumstancesappearingagainsthim.Hedeniedtheincriminating 9 of19S.C.No.26of 2023

7)Heardargumentsbothsides. on

8)Thepointsfor determination are:- (1)Whetherthevictimisminorthedateof ason offenceSection2(d)ofProtectionof asper ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct?

the prosecutionthe guilt of

(2)Whetherhasproved

theaccusedfortheoffencespunishableunder Sections366-A,376(2)(n),493,496ofLPC andSection5(1)t/w6(1)ofProtectionof ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct,2012 beyondall reasonabledoubt?

thedefacto-complainantandmotherofvictim

9)P.W.1,whois

girl/L.W.3/xxx, deposedthat she

doesknowaccusedandthatshedoes not of thisfurtherdeposedthatwhentheywentto notknowfactsP,W.1 case.

obtainedhersignatureunderEx.P.1andthatshe PoliceStation,thePolice of thecomplaint.P.W.2,whoisthefatherof doesnotknowthecontents hedoesknowaccusedandthathedoesnot victimgirl, deposedthatnot whoisthevictimgirl, deposedthatshe knowfactsof thisP.W.3, case.

thatshedoesnotknowfactsofthiscase. doesnotknowaccusedand girl,alsodeposedthatshedoesnotknow P.W.4,whoisauntofvictim accusedandthatshedoesnotknowfactsof thiscase.

Fair

10 of19S.C.No.26of 2023

10)

P.W.5,whoistheInvestigatingOfficer,deposedthat on 28.01.2023at0830hours,L.W.18/B.CheenaNayak,SubInspectorof a complaint Police,SircillareceivedfromP.W.1underEx.P.6,thatbasing on thesaidcomplaint,L.W.18registeredin CrimeNo.39/2023under acase

Section3631.P.CandissuedFirstInformationReportunderEx.P.7,that

of investigation,

duringtheL.W.18hasflashedR/MsandLook courseout noticetoalltheconcernedofficersandthatlater,L.W.18visitedthefirst ofcrimeandsecuredtwopanchwitnesses,ie,L.W.11/Samala scene

SanthoshandL.W.12/DubalaSanthosh,observedtheofcrimeand scene

its surroundings

minutelyandincorporatedits detailsin crimedetailsform underEx.P.8.

11)

P.W.5furtherdeposedthatwhiletheeffortsin progress wereto

the kidnapped girl, on

traceout30-01-2023at2130hours,theparentsof victim, i-e., PWs.12 produced theandthevictimgirtbeforetheL.W.18,that

L.W.18referredthevictimgirltoSakhiCenter,SircillaunderWoman escort requestingtoprovideshelterforfurtherthat31-01-2023, process,on

L.W.18gotrecordedthestatementofthevictimgirl/P.W3through

L.W.6/D.Navatha,WS!ofPolice,PSVeernapalliSakhiCenter,Sircilla at undervideographyandthataccordingtheof thevictimgirl, tostatement

Fair11ofS.C.No.26of 2023 19 thw 6(1) of Protectionof ChildrenSexualOffencesAct,2012against from theaccusedunderEx.P.9/sectionaddition memo.

deposedthathetookfurtherinvestigationof

12)P.W.5furtherup investigationdonebyL.W.18andfoundit onproper thisverifiedthe case, 1*of crime,observedtheof lines,thatL.W.18proceededtoscenescene its surroundingsbutdidredrawit hadalready andminutelynotas crime referredthevictimgir/PW.3tothe beendrawnbyL.W.18,thathe up alongwithrequisitiontoconduct DistrictHospital,Sircilla Government thatL.W.15/Dr.D.Sushma_conducted medicalexaminationandreport,

girlandpreservedhermaterialobjects,

medicalexaminationthevictim over hairandvaginalwashforonward ie.,slidesofswab,pubic smear, forexaminationandreport,that

transmissionR.F.S.L.,Karimnagar

to thatEx.P.11isthefinal

isthepreliminaryexaminationreport,

Ex.P.10 opinion reportandthatEx.P.12is theFSLreport.

thematerialobjectsof thevictim

furtherdeposedthat

13)P.W.5 hasbeenreceived R.F.S.L.,Karimnagarandreport girlsenttoa were 3 and4examined,is whereinit wasopinedthat“items1, 2,aresemen detected,and 2,butspermatozoaisnotsemen detectedinitem 1,3 and4” andthatbasingthe detectedin itemson spermatozoaarenot

issued herdetectedin

finalopinionthat“semenis report,L.W.15

Fair

12 of19S.C.No.26of 2023 itemNo.2butisdetected, spermatozoanotfinalopiniongiven soas “consistentwithrecentinterpossibilityof course,sexualassaultcouldbe ruledout”.

14)P.W.5furtherdeposedthatsubsequently,he along

withpanch

witnesses,ie,L.W.13/AdepuNareshand

L.W.14/EligetiBhaskar

proceededto2™ sceneofcrimesituated

SriLordRajaRajeswara

near

SwamyTempleandintheofabovepanch presencewitnesses,he observedthe2™ sceneofcrimeminutely andincorporateditsdetailsin crimedetailsformunderEx.P.13,thathe securedtheof presence

L.W.8/KatlaMalleshamwhothe gaveroomtoaccusedrentbasis, on examinedandrecordedhis statement,thatfromthere,he along with panch witnessesproceededto3"ofcrime scenesituatednearbySriLordRaja

RajeswaraSwamy Temple,andin the presenceof abovepanch witnesses, heobservedthe3% sceneof crimeminutely andincorporatedits detailsin crimedetailsformunderEx.P.14 andthathesecuredthe presenceof

L.W.9/SripathiSravan,who

totheaccusedbasis,

gaveroomrent on examinedandrecordedhis statement.

15)P.W.5furtherdeposed thatwhileeffortsin wereprogressto

Fair13 of19S.C.No.26of 2023 apprehendedtheaccusedhishouseandinterrogated,that aton interrogation,theaccusedvoluntarilyconfessedtohavecommittedthis thatheaffectedthearrestoftheaccused,thathereferredthe offence,

Sircillawitha requestconduct accusedGovernmentDistrictHospital,to to medicalhealthexaminationwellpotencytesttheaccusedand asason

L.W.16/Dr.P.Raghuconductedmedicalexaminationand issuereports,that theaccusedisbeingfitforremandwell issuedreportsuchasas as conductedandissuedpotencycertificateunderEx.P.15 potencytest impotency’andthatrequisition,L.W.17/ opiningthat“noona

Pri.JudicialMagistrateofFirstClass,Sircillarecorded

Smt.K.Sowjanya,

theof thevictimgirlunderSection164Cr.P.C. statement furtherdeposedthathecollecteddateof birthcertificate

16)P.W.5 fromL.W.10/P.Mallesham,HeadMaster,that of thevictimgirlunderEx.P.16 accordingthedateof birthcertificate,thedateof birthof thevictimis to subsequently,heCDRs,CAFsandcertificateunder 18.08.2006,that fromtheconcernedofficials,whereinit Section65-Bof IndianEvidenceAct accusedcontactedthevictimgirl repeatedlythe disclosedthattheover was withherandthataftercompletionofentire phoneandusedtotalk sheetagainsttheaccusedforthe investigation,hehasfiledcharge

Sections363,376(2)(n),493,496of I.P.Cand

__offencespunishableunder

=

a

eT

v

ay*

Fair

14 of19S.C.No.26of 2023

5(1)rAw6(1)

SectionofProtectionofChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct, 2012.

17)Theoftheprosecutionis thatpriorto27.01.2023,while case theminorvictimgirl/P.W.3ho«studying Narsing2™ Yearin SriBrindasri was

VocationalCollegeatSircillaandwhiletheaccusedresidingthe wasnear houseat Sundaraiahnagar, of victimgirlinrentedsituatedSircilla, aroom theaccusedgot acquaintancewithherandusedto followherthepretext on ofloveandmarriageandthat27.02.2023,theaccusedabductedthe on

minorvictimgirl,tookhertoSriRajaRajeswaraSwamyTemple,

of being married

Vemulawadaandwentthroughtheto thevictim ceremony andcommittedtheminorvictimgirl repeatedlyandthereby rapeon committedaggravatedpenetrativesexualassaulther. on

18)Toitstheprosecutionhasexamined provecase,P.Ws.1to5 andgotmarkedExs.P.1toP.16.PW.1,whoisthemotherofvictim girl/P.W.3/xxx, deposedthatshedoesknowaccusedandthat notshedoes notknowfactsof thisP.W.1furtherdeposedthatwhenthey case.wentto

Station,her signature

PolicethePoliceobtainedunderEx.P.1andthatshe doesnotknowthecontentsofthecomplaint.P.W.2,whoisthefather of ~—-~—victimgirl, deposedthathedoesknowaccusedandthathedoes notnot

VA

aha Pay

factsofthisP.W.3,whoisthevictimgirl, deposedthat case.she y

Fair15 of19S.C.No.26of 2023 doesknowaccusedandthatshedoesnotknowfactsofthiscase. not

P.W.4,whoisauntofvictimgirl,alsodeposedthatshedoesnotknow accusedandthatshedoesknowfactsof thisP.Ws.1to4 didnot notcase.

anythingagainsttheaccused.Theydeclaredhostilebythe statewereas

andthough,theycross-examinedbythelearnedSpeciai

prosecutionwere nothingis elicitedfromthemin favourof theprosecution. PublicProsecutor, deniedhavestatedbeforethePolicein Exs.P.2to EvenP.Ws.1to4toas

P.5/161Cr.P.Cstatementsrespectively.

is theInvestigatingOfficerin thisandhisevidence

19)P.W.5case

investigationbyhimandL.W.18/B.CheenaNayak,Sub

showsaboutdone ofPolice,Sircillavariouslevels.Asthematerialwitnesses Inspectorat

to 4, including thevictimgirl,didsupporttheprosecution

P.Ws.1notcase, sufficientconnecttheaccusedwiththe theevidenceofP.W.5isnotto

allegedoffences.

20)POINTNO.1:

2(d)of Protectionof ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct Section

of eighteen

belowtheyears”.To statesthat“childanypersonage means

girl, prosecutionhasexaminedP.W.5andgot

establishofthevictim age ofBirthCertificateofthevictim edEx.P.16/Study,Conduct&Date

Fair16 of19 S.C.No.26of 2023 girl/P.W.3.Asthesaidcertificate,thedate perof birthof thevictimgirlis 18.08.2006.evidenceof Investigating AspertheOfficer/P.W.5

and

asper

FirstInformationReport/Ex.P.7,thevictimis below 18thedateof yearson offence.As such,thevictim/P.W.3a child wasdefinedunderSection2(d) as ofProtectionof ChildrenfromSexualOffences Act.Therefore,prosecution establishedboththroughoralanddocumentary evidencethatthe victim/P.W.3minorthedateofoffence. wasonAccordingly,pointNo.1is answered.

21)POINTNO.2:

On a careful

scrutinyof theentireevidenceavailable onrecord, itisthatoftheprosecutionwitnesses seennonehavesupportedthe prosecutionEventhevictimgirl, ie.,did case.PW.3notstateanything againsttheaccused.P.W.3/victimsimplystated thatshedoesnotknow factsof thisTherefore,it is clearis absolutely case.thatthereevidence no all against attheaccusedtoconnecthimwiththealleged offences.Thus, theprosecutionfailedestablish totheguiltofaccusedfortheoffences punishableunderSections 366-A,376(2)(n), 493,496of I.-CandSection 5(1)tw6(1)ofProtectionofChildren fromSexualOffencesAct,2012 beyondallreasonabledoubt andtheaccusedis entitledfor acquittal.Point

S.C.No.26of 2023 17 of19 foundguiltyforthe RESULT,theaccusedisnot

22)INTHE 376(2)(n),493,496ofI.P.Cand punishableunderSections366-A, offences of ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct,

5(1)rw6(1)of Protection

Section is acquitted235(1)Cr.P.C.Thebail underSection andaccordingly,he 2012 a period of shallremainin forcefor bondsof theaccused bondsandsurety

Section437-ACr.P.C. monthsfromtodayper sixas - I, corrected Gradeand

dictationbytheStenographer

Typedtomy 7" day of November,2025.

in theCourtthisthe

pronouncedbymeopenon

IONSJUDGE,

| ADDITIONAL,

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

SESSIONSJUDGE,

FAC:SPECIAL

POCSOCOURT,

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

PENDIX OFEVIDENCE

NESSESEXAMINE

FORDEFENCE:

PROSECUTION:

FOR

P.W-1:Motherof victim/xxx. ---None--- P.W-2:Fatherof victim/xxx. P.W-3:Victim/xxx. P.W-4:B.Geetha.

A.Vishwaprasad,InvestigatingOfficer.

P.W-5:

Fair 18 of19S.C. No.26of 2023

EXHIBITSMARKED:

FORPROSECUTION:

Ex.P.1:28.01.2023Signatureof P.W.1a complaint. on Ex.P.2:28.01.2023Statement oftheP.W.1underSection 161 CrPc, Ex.P.3:28.01.2023Statement oftheP.W.2underSection 161 crPc. Ex.P.4:31.01.2023Statement oftheP.W.3underSection 161 Cr.P.c, Ex.P.5:31.01.2023Statement oftheP.W.4underSection 161 CrP.c,

Ex.P.6:28,01.2023Original complaint.

Ex.P.7:28.01.2023First InformationReportinCrime No.39of 2023of PS.Sircilla. Ex.P.8:28.01.2023First CrimeDetailsFormalong

withrough

sketch. Ex.P.9:Section AlterationMemo.

Ex.P.10:31.01.2023PreliminaryExamination

Report.

Ex.P.41:14.02.2023Final opinion report.

Ex.P.12:20.02.2023F.S.L.

Report.

Ex.P.13:28.01.2023Second CrimeDetailsFormalongwith

rough

sketch. Ex.P.14:28.01.2023Third CrimeDetailsFormalong

withrough

sketch.

Ex.P.15:Potency

Certificate. Ex.P.16:29.03.2023Study, Conduct&DateofBirth Certificateof thevictimgirl/P.W.3.

Fair19 of19S.C.No.26of 2023

MATERIALOBJECTS:

| ADDITIONAL{ONSJUDGE,

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

%tp

_4FJUDGE,

FAC:SPECIALSESSIONS

Se

POCSOCOURT,

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

k

ee

™

S.C.No.116of 2022 1of18 Fair

JUDGE,FASTTRACK

THESPL.SESSIONS

IN THECOURTOF

DISPOSALOFRAPE

EXPEDITIOUSTRIALAND

SPECIALCOURTFOR

.

AT RAJANNASIRCILLA.

ANDPOCSOCASES

B.PUSHPALATHA,

PRESENT:

SESSIONSJUDGE,

1ADDL.

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

Spl.SessionsJudge,

FAC: for ExpeditiousTrial& FTSCourt Disposalof RapeandPOCSOActCases,

RajannaSircilla.

4" dayof November,2025 Tuesday,thisthe

(POCSO)NO.116OF2022

SESSIONSCASE

of the complainantIs:"||TheStatethroughSub Divisional

Police,

‘Name

||lOfticer,

(CrimeNo.30of;

Vemulawada i:

of P.S. Boinpalli).

| }]2022

Shankaraiah,

IsS/o

j|MaramNarender,

Descriptionof theaccused

Munnurukapu,

'

‘|Aged:Caste:

23years, |

||RioH.No.4-23,villageof:

Vilasagar

|

BoinpalliMandal.!

|

|

|iUnder Sections

417, 420,354-D,366-A,;

[3 ||

‘Charges-|

Section5(1)rhv,

||376(2)(n)ofL.P.Cand

||

ofChildrenfrom)

l6(1)ofProtection

||| Sexual

OffencesAct,2012. !

Not guilty.7

[-

|Pleaof the

accused

|

| L

|Not guilty.

Findingof theCourt|

|

|. eeeee

iTheguiltyforthe,

Le|accusedisfoundnot order

Sentenceor| offences

underSections417,

punishable

|

|__|]420,354-0, 366-A, 376(2(n)of LPC

yo

Fair

2 of18S.C. No.116of 2022

Act, 2032:

/ChildrenfromSexual Offences

andaccordingly,is acquitted

heunder

Section235(1)Cr.P.C.Thebail bonds andsuretybondsofthe accusedshall

a period of six months

|

iJremain in force

for

from today

asperSection437-ACr.P.C.

bearing No.TS-|

ThePulsarMotorCycle

its owner

23-B-1069shallbereturned to

identification

onproperand

expiryofappeal

acknowledgementafter

phone shall

time.TheSamsungmobile

beconfiscatedthe toStateafterexpiryof

appealtime.

L

‘ProsecutionPenta Srinivas,

conductedbySri :

Spl.PublicProsecutor.

‘Defenceconductedby

Sri E.Madhusudhan nRao, Advocatefor theaccused.

is comingfinal hearing

Thisbefore caseme16.10.2025for on in theof Sri

presencePentaSrinivas,Spl.Public

Prosecutorfor theState andof SriE.Madhusudhan Rao,Advocatefor the

accused,perusing

upon thematerial papersonrecord,hearingthe uponargumentsandthe matter havingstoodfor overconsiderationtill thisday, theCourtdeliveredthe

following:

JUDGMENT

1)The SubDivisionalPoliceOfficer, Vemulawadahasfiledcharge

be

Nes,

Qa S.C.No.116of 2022

Fair3of18

376(2)(n)of 1.P.Cand

420,354-D,366-A, underSections417,

punishable

SexualOffencesAct, ofChildrenfrom

pectin5(1)rAw 6(1) of Protection

of BoinpalliPoliceStation.

2012 03.03.2022at22:00 thethaton brieffactsofcaseare

2.01)The

a complaint

the defacto-complainant/L.W.Lvictimlodgedat

girlhas

hours, of Vilasagarvillageof sheis resident

Boinpallistatingthat

PoliceStation, is stayingin || Yearand

completedIntermediate

BoinpalliMandal.Shehas accusedusedtofollow 6"class,the

studying

Whileshewas herhouse.

sherefusedhis to getbut andharassedhermarry, of love herin thename changehis though,hedidnot shechild.Even proposalby claimingthatwas 10"class,the shein followher.Whenwas andcontinuedto attitude him. After inducedhertolove

phonecallsherand

to maketo

accusedused

JuniorCollegeat

studyingIntermediateat Government

thatwhenshewas inducedwithhis hercollegeand accusedusedtocometo

Karimnagar,the

threatened thehe andif shedeniessame, to gethim falsepromisesmarry shecouldnot

by sayingthat

sherefused

die.which, hewouldFor that

completionof her

in herhouseafter

staying

majority.Whileshewas attain induced herhouse, accusedusedtocometo education,the Intermediate deniestoget herif she alsousedtothreaten himand hertogetmarry him.Later,sinceoneyear, agreedtolove At last,she he woulddie.

oN

cehand Di

KuSy,

‘Ssax , 52 2 3

Ys

%

aa

byGREW

i

Fair

4of18S.C. No.116of 2022 theaccusedusedtake tohertoVemulawada,

Kondagattu,Jagitial,

KarimngarandGattuBhuthkurvillages

inandbike, forcibly exploitey

acar hersexuallyforseveraltimesby believingof marriage. in the nameWhen shefor marriage, askedthe accusedpostponedthe matteronthepretextof aftermarriageofhisAt last, youngersister.26.02.2022 onatabout1130

hours,shemadephone

calltotheaccusedandasked himtoget marry he bluntly refused her, butto get marryherandadvisedto get marriage with

anotherher parents,

person.Uponwhichsheinformed theabovematter to auntSattaNitya/L.W.4anduncle SattaNaresh/L.W.5andher

villager

RagaliaVeeraiah,whoaskedto get theaccusedher marrybuthedenied to

to take necessary

marryher.Finallyshe

requested

action.

2.02)Basingthe

abovecomplaint,L.W.27/Y.Chandramouli,

onthe

A.S.|1872ofP.SBoinpallihas

registeredin Crime

—acaseNo.30/2022 underSections417, 420,354-D,366-A,376(2)(n)of 1.P.C andSection5(1) tw6(1)of Protectionof Children fromSexualOffences Act,2012andtook

investigation.Duringtheof investigation,

up courseL.W.27referredthe victim/L.W.1toGovernment Hospital,Sircillafor medicalexaminationalong

withrequisition.Further,

L.W.27collecteddateofbirth certificateofthe

victimfromL.W.6/Mittapalli Parsharam,

HeadMaster,ZPHSSchool,

Vilasagarvillageand

asperthethedate same,ofbirthof. victimis

ASE

S.C.No.116of 2022 Fair5 of18 of victim,heris dateofbirthcertificateage Accordingtothe _21.06.2003.

thetimeof offence. below(18) yearsat

Z

SubDivisionalPolice

L.W.28/S.Chandrakanth,

2.03)Subsequently,

theinvestigationdone

up investigation,verified

Vemulawadatook Officer, andhisdirections, founditlineson byL.W.27andonproper

Core,Rajanna

ofPolice,..T

L.W.26/D.Navatha,WomenSub-Inspector

minorgirlunderthe statementof victim examinedandrecordedthe Sircilla

Siricilla.

of L.W.7/KamarapuVenuatSakhicentre,

videographywithhelp

withherpetition shecorroborated examinationthevictim, Duringthe contents.

of offencesituated visitedthe1° Subsequently,L.W.28scene

2.04)

victimsexually

accusedexploitedtheon Townwherethe at Vemulawadaa oftwomediators

marriage,securedthepresence

of loveand thepretext observedtheminutely, & L.W.16/K.Srinivas,scene

L.W.15/A.Gopal

i.e.,

the rough

formanddrafted in crimedetails incorporatedthedetailsof scene sketchof scenein theirpresence.

05.03.2022at1000hours in progress, Whiletheeffortsareon

2.05)

accusedatVilasagar

apprehendedthe

reliableinformation,L.W.27 on

cyclebearingNo.TS-23-

of BoinpalliMandalalongwithPulsarmotor

village

Fair

6 of18S.C.No.116of 2022

SDPOoffice,Vemulawada1030hours. atAccordingly,L.W.28interrogated theaccusedintheof presencetwomediatorsi.e.,L.W.19/B.Sudheey

Kumar&L.W.20/M.Upender.Duringthe interrogation,theaccused confessedtohavecommittedtheoffenceby knowinglythat thevictimis a minorgirl.Inofconfessionof accused, pursuanceL.W.28seized one

SamsungmobilephoneandPulsar onemotorcyclebearingNo.TS-23-B- 1069fromthepossessionandtheinstance atof accusedin theof presence

abovemediatorsunderofpanchanama.

coverconfessionandseizure

Later,L.W.28effectedtheof arresttheaccusedproducedhimbefore

on the

L.W.22/Dr.S.RadhaKrishnaforconducting potencytestaccused.

AccordinglyL.W.22conducted

potencytesttheaccusedandissued on

is nothing to suggest

potencycertificateopiningthat“there

thathecannot performsexualact".

2.06)TheLadyMedicalOfficer/L.W.21/Dr.N.Sai

Krupaexaminedthe

victimandpreservingmaterialobjects,i.e., (1) vaginal

swabs,(2) vaginal

slides,(3) vaginalwash,(4) pubic

hairandclothesviz.,(5). Kurthi,

(6)

Legging,(7).Panties,(8) petticoat

and(9)Scarfofvictimand issued

to R.AS.L.,

preliminarymedicalexamination

reporttoforwardthe same

Karimnagarforexaminationand report.Accordingly,L.W.28forwarded the

SS

S.C.No.116of 2022 7 of18

Fair

opinedthatItems1, 2, 3, whereinit was

gotcollectedR.F.S.Lreport,

L.W.28 detected spermatozoanot andare examined,semen &5, 6, 7,8 and9are

report,L.W.21

theR.F.S.L 8and9".Basingon

1, 2, 3,4,5,6, 7,

in items consistentwithrecent openingthat"not

medicalopinion

issuedfinal couldberuledout”. possibilityof sexualassaultnot intercourse, situated 2™ sceneof offence L.W.28visitedthe

Subsequently,

2.07)

exploitedthe

theaccused Town,where

Mankkammathota,Karimnagar

at

i.e,L.W.17/D.Rahul

of twomediators

sexually,securedthepresence

victim roughsketchof minutely,draftedthe & L.W.18/R.Gopi,observedthescene a requisition,26.03.2022, from.Onon in crimedetails of offence scene

Sircillarecorded

of FirstClass,

Pri. JudicialMagistrate

L.W.23/K.Sowjanya,

Section164Cr.P.C. of thevictim/L.W.1/xxxunder thestatement

girlthroughhismobile

thevictimminor accusedinduced 2.08)The No.7386566026withhis

mobilephone

No.6300095852thevictim to

phone

fulfillhis marriageinorderto ofloveand

thepretext

falsepromiseson collectedCDRs, which,L.W.28 victimminorgirl.For sexuallustwiththe

(accused)and

No.6300095852

themobile and65-Bcertificateson CAEs

L.W.24/V.Venkatanarayan,NodalOfficer,

. 7386566026(victimmobile)from

RelianceJio NodalOfficer,

L.W.25/G.HariPrasad,

Networkand

Airtel thevictim mutualcallsbetween , Hyderabad,whereinfoundthe

Fair

8 of18 S.C.No.116of 2022 andaccused.of investigation

Aftercompletion

andaftercollectingallthe

relevantdocuments,L.W.28/S.Chandrakanth,

SubDivisionalPoliceOffices;

Vemulawadathe offences

hasfiledchargesheetagainst theaccusedfor underSections417,420,354-D, 366-A,376(2)(n)I.P.Cand

Section5(1)

tw6(1)of Protectionof Children fromSexualOffences Act,2012.Hence,

the charge sheet.

3)Thelearned| Addl.

SessionsJudge,Karimnagartook

the case filefortheoffencesunder

onSections417,420,366-A, 376(2)(n)

354-D,

.P.CandSection5(1)rv6(1) ofProtectionofChildren fromSexual

OffencesAct,2012against

theaccused.Subsequently,

this casewas transferredtotheCourtof| Addl.

SessionsJudge,Rajanna

Sircillafor

disposalaccordinglaw.Thereafter,

tothe casetransferredtothis was

for disposal

Courtaccording

tolaw.

4)On appearanceoftheaccusedandafterhearing

bothsides,

thisCourtframedcharges underSections417,

420,354-D,366-A,

376(2)(n)I.P.Cand Section5(1)r/w6(1)of ProtectionofChildrenfrom

SexualOffencesAct, 2012againsttheaccused, readandexplained overto

in Telugu. He pleaded

himnot guilty and claimedtobetried.

Fair

Sof18S.C.No.116of 2022 >Duringtheoftrial,P.Ws.1to6examinedand coursewere

Exs.P.1toP.16markedbehalfof theprosecution.Theevidenceof wereon

remainingwitnessesgiven-up bytheSpecialPublicProsecutorthe

wasas

not supportof prosecution.

materialwitnessesdidthe case of prosecutionevidence,accused

6)Afterclosuresidethewas examinedunderSection313CrP.Cinrespectofincriminating circumstancesappearingagainsthim.Hedeniedtheincriminating circumstancesandreporteddefenceevidencehisbehalf. noon

7)Heardargumentsbothsides. on

8)Thepointsfor determination are:- (1)Whetherthevictimisminorthedateof ason offenceSection2(d)ofProtectionof asper ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct?

the prosecutionthe guilt of

(2)Whetherhasproved

theaccusedfortheoffencesunderSections 417,420,354-D,366-A,376(2)(n)1.P.Cand

PX

5(1)r/w6(1)Children

SectionofProtectionof S SexualOffencesAct,2012beyondall from . reasonabledoubt?

Fair10 of18S.C.No.116of 2022

defacto-compiainantandvictim, deposedtha

9)P.W.1,whois the shedoesknowtheaccusedandthatshedoesnotknowfactsof this not furtherdeposedthatwhentheywenttoPoliceStation,the P.W.1 case.

her signatureundershedoesknowthe PoliceobtainedEx.P.1andthatnot ofthecomplaint.P.W.2,whoisthemotherofvictim/P.W.1, contents deposedthatshedoesnotknowtheaccusedandthatshedoesnotknow factsof thiscase.

10)HeadZPHS,Manuwada,deposedthat P.W.3,Master,on

of requisition fromStudy,

receiptPolice,Boinpallion04.03.2022,heissued

ConductandDateofBirthCertificateofthevictimgirl/P,W.1/xxxunder

Ex.P.4alongwithattestedof $.S.Cmarksandthataccordingto copymemo theschoolrecordsandS.S.Cmarksthedateof birthof thevictimis memo, 21.06.2003.

11)P.Ws.4and5 whocircumstantialwitnesses,deposedthat are theydonotknowfactsof thisandthatthePoliceexaminedand casenever recordedtheirstatements.

12)P.W.6,whoistheInvestigatingOfficer,deposedthat on 03.03.2022at2200hours,L.W.27/Y.Chadramouli,A.S.11872ofPS. -

QL

Fair

l11lof18S.C.No.116of 2022 complaint,L.W.27registeredin Crime acaseNo.30of 2022underSections 417,420,354-D,366-A,376(2)(n)ofI.P.Cand5 (I) rw Section6(1)of

ProtectionofChildrenfromSexual OffencesAct,2012issuedFirst

of investigation,

InformationReportunderEx.P.8,thatduring

the course

L.W.27referredthevictimGovernment toHospital,Sircillaformedical

examinationalongwithrequisitionandthat

L.W.27collecteddateof birth certificate/Ex.P.4ofthevictimfromL.W.6/Mittapalli Parsharam, Head

Vilasagar village,wherein

Master,ZPHSSchool,it certifiedthatthe was dateof birthof thevictimis 21.06.2003.

that he took

13)P.W.6furtherdeposed up investigation,verifiedthe investigationdonebyL.W.27andfound itlines,thathis onproperon directions,L.W.26/D.Navatha,WomenSubof Police,

Inspector|.TCore,

ofthe

RajannaSircillarecordedthestatement'victim/P.W.1/xxx underthe videographyatSakhiCentre,Siricillaandthathevisited1°of scene offencesituatedatVemulawadaTown,securedthe presenceof

L.W.15/Alugunni GopalandL.W.2.6/KunchanaSrinivas,

observedthe scene minutely, incorporatedthedetailsofin crime scenedetailsformanddrafted theroughsketchof sceneunderEx.P.9.

14)P.W.6furtherdeposedthat05.03.2022hours, onat1000 on

S.C.No.116of 2022 Fair12 of18

cycle bearingNo.TS-23-B-

of BoinpalliMandalalongwithPulsarmotor at S.D.P.Qy producedtheaccusedbeforehim thatL.W.27broughtand 1069, he interrogatedtheaccusedin the Vemulawadaat1030hours,that Office,

L.W.20/MaramUpender,

of L.W.19/BonthulaSudheerKumarand presence confessedhavecommittedthe interrogationtheaccusedto thatduringthe ofaccused,heseized inofconfessionone offence,thatpursuance

Pulsarcycle bearingNo.TS-23-B-

mobilephoneandmotor Samsungone accusedin theof possessionandinstanceof thepresence 1069fromthe

andseizurepanchanama

underofconfession abovemediatorsacover accusedandproducedhim thatheeffectedarrestofthe underEx.P.10, conductingtestthe L.W.22/Dr.S.RadhaKrishnaforpotencyon

before

theaccusedand accusedandthatL.W.22conductedpotencyteston

is nothing

Ex.P.12opiningthat“thereto issuedcertificateunder

potency

heperformsexualact”. suggestthatcannot

deposedthatrequisitionalongwith

P.W.6furtherhesenta

15)

thatL.W.21/Dr.N.SaiKrupa,Lady

victimgirlformedicalexamination,

and preservedobjects,i.e., (1)

examinedthevictimmaterial MedicalOfficer

and(3) vaginalwash,(4) pubichairand

vaginalswabs,(2) vaginalslides

(6) Legging,(7)Panties,(8)Petticoatand(9)Scarf clothesviz.,(5)Kurthi, medicalexaminationreportunderEx.P.13 of victimandissuedpreliminary

“es

Fair

13 of18S.C.No.116of 2022 to forwardthematerialobjectsto R.A.S.L.,Karimnagarforexaminationand report,thatR.F.S.L.ReportunderEx.P.14hasbeenreceivedandthat :

basingtheR.F.S.L.Report,L.W.21issuedfinalmedicalopinionunder on

Ex.P.15opiningthat“notconsistentwithrecentintercourse,possibilityof sexualassaultcouldnotberuledout”.

16)P.W.6furtherdeposedthathevisited2"ofoffence scene situatedatMankkammathota,KarimnagarTown,wheretheaccused exploitedthevictimsexually,securedtheL.W.17/Devarakonda presence

Rahuland£.W.18/RajavarapuGopi,observedtheminutely,drafted scene theroughsketchofof offencein crimedetailsfromunderEx.P.16, scene

his requisition, L.W.23/Smt.K.Soujanya,

thatPrl.JudicialMagistrateof on

FirstClass,SircillarecordedthestatementofvictimunderSection164

of investigation,

Cr.P.Candthataftercompletionhefiledchargesheet againsttheaccusedfortheoffencesunderSections417,420,354-D,366-

5 (I) rAv 6(2) of Protection

A,376(2)(n)I.P.CandSectionof Childrenfrom

SexualOffencesAct,2012.

17)Theoftheprosecutionisthatpriorto03.03.2022,the case accusedfollowedtheminorvictimgir/P.W.1theofloveand onname of marriagefulfill marriageandinducedherwithfalsepromiseinorderto tt voll

Sy.

wo

Fair14 of18S.C.No.116of 2022

committedaggravatedpenetrativesexual

forseveraltimesandthereby assaulther.4 on theprosecutionhasexaminedP.Ws.1to6

18)Toitscase, prove whois thevictim, deposedthatshe andgotmarkedExs.P.1toP.16.P.W.1, accusedandthatshedoesnotknowfactsof this doesnotknowthecase.

whentheywenttoPoliceStation,thePolice P.W.1furtherdeposedthat underEx.P.1andthatshedoesnotknowthe obtainedhersignature whoisthemotherofvictim/P.W.1and ofthecomplaint.P.W.2, contents circumstantialwitnesses,deposedthattheydonot P.Ws.4and5 who are andthatthePoliceexaminedandrecorded knowfactsof thisnever case &5didstateanythingagainstthe theirstatements.P.Ws.1,2,4not declaredhostilebytheprosecutionandthough, accused.Theyas were cross-examinedbythelearnedSpecialPublicProsecutor,

they

were of the prosecution.2,4 nothingis elicitedfromthemin favourEvenP.Ws.1, deniedhavestatedbeforethePoliceinExs.P.2,P.3,PS& &5toas

P.6/161Cr.P.Cstatementsrespectively.

19)TheevidenceofP.W.3showsthatheissuedStudy,Conduct of Birthof thevictimgirl/P.W.1/xxxunderEx.P.4along andDateCertificate withattestedof S.S.Cmarksandthataccordingtotheschool copymemo

PS

3

Fair

15 of18S.C.No.116of 2022 recordsandS.S.Cmarksthedateof memo,birthofthevictimis » 21.06.2003.

20)P.W.6is theInvestigatingOfficerin thisandhis caseevidence

showsaboutinvestigationdonebyhimandL.W.27/Y.Chandramouli,

A.S.I of Police, BoinpalliP.Satvariouslevels.AsthematerialwitnessesP.Ws.1, 2,4 & 5, including the victimgirl,didnotsupporttheprosecutionthe case, evidenceofP.W.6isnotsufficienttotheaccusedwiththealleged connect offences.

21)POINTNO.1:

Section2(d)of Protectionof ChildrenfromSexualOffences Act

of eighteen

statesthat“childbelowtheyears”.To meansanypersonage establishtheof thevictimgirl,theprosecutionhasexaminedP.W.3and age gotmarkedEx.P.4/Study,Conduct&DateofBirthCertificateofthevictim girl/P.W.1.Astheevidenceof P.W.3andEx.P.4,thedateof birthof the per victimgirlis 21.06.2003.Asthedateof offence,theof thevictimis onage 19years.Assuch,thevictim/P.W.1notchilddefinedunder wasaas

Section2(d)of Protectionof ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct.Therefore, . prosecution didnotestablishthatthevictim/P.W.1minorthedateof wason offence.Accordingly, pointNo.1is answered.

S.C.No.116of 2022

Fair16 of18

22)POINT_NO.2:

availablerecord,

scrutinyof theentireevidenceon Ona careful havesupportedthe oftheprosecutionwitnesses itisthatnone seen didstateanything thevictimgirl,i.e.,P.W.1not

prosecutionEven

case.

statedthatshedoesnotknow

accused.P.W.1/victimsimply

againstthe is absolutelyevidence Therefore,it is clearthatthereno factsof this case.

theallegedoffences.Thus, all againstaccusedconnecthimwith theto at guiltofaccusedfortheoffences failedestablishthe theprosecutionto

376(2)(n)of |.P.Cand

417,420,354-D,366-A,

punishableunderSections

ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct, rw6(1)ofProtectionof

Section5(1)

for acquittal.

andtheaccusedis entitled beyondall reasonabledoubt 2012

is answeredaccordingly.

PointNo.2 accusedisfoundnotguiltyforthe

23)THERESULT,the IN

354-D,366-A,376(2)(n)of

punishableunderSections417,420,

offences ofChildrenfromSexual 5(1)rw6(1)ofProtection .P.CandSection

is acquitted under(1)

accordingly,heSection235 OffencesAct,2012and of theaccusedshallremainin Thebailbondsandsuretybonds of Cr.P.C.

a periodtodaySection437-ACr.P.C. forofsixmonthsfromasper force

No.TS-23-B-1069shallbereturnedtoits

PulsarMotorCycle bearing

The

Fair

17 of18S.C.of 2022 No.116 time.TheSamsungmobilephoneshailbeconfiscated totheStateafter

}expiry of appeal

time.

Grade - |, corrected

Typedtomy dictationbytheStenographer

and

pronouncedbymein the4" day of November,

openCourtthisthe2025. on

ETADDITION.SSIONSJUDGE,

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

FAC:SPECIALSESSIONSJUDGE,

POCSOCOURT,

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

APPENVIDENCE

WITNXAMINED

EORPROSECUTION:FORDEFENCE: .

P.W-1:Victirn/xxx. P.W-2:Motherof victim/xxx.---None--- P.W-3:M.Parsharamulu. P.W-4:R.Veeravva.

P.W-5:O.Sandeep.

P.W-6;S.Chandrakanth,InvestigatingOfficer.

'S MARKED:

EOR PROSECUTION:

a complaint. Ex.P.1:03.03.2022Signatureof P.W.1 on Ex.P.2:04.03.2022StatementoftheP.W.1underSection161 CrP.c.

04.03.2022StatementofthePW.2underSection161 CrP.C.

S.C.No.116of 2022 Fair18 of18

of,

DateofBirthCertificate

Ex.P.4:13.08.2013Study,Conduct&

thevictin/P.W.1. PW.4underSection161 07.03.2022Statementofthe Ex.P.5: CrP.c. theP.W.5underSection161

Ex.P.6:16.03.2022Statementof

Cr.P.c.

Original complaint.

Ex.P,7:03.03.2022 inCrimeNo.30of FirstInformationReport Ex.P.8:03.03.2022

of P.S.Boinpalli.

2022

rough

EXx.P.9:03.03.2022DetailsFormalongwith

FirstCrime sketch.

Confession-cum-seizurepanchanama.

Ex.P.10:05.03.2022

Pulsarcycle

photographsofmotor Ex.P.11:Two -

bearingNo.TS-23-B-1069.,

Ex.P,12:05.03.2022Potencycertificate.

PreliminaryExaminationReport.

Ex.P.13:05.03.2022 01.04.2022R.F.S.L.Report. Ex.P.14: 01.04.2022Finalopinion. Ex.P.15:

DetailsFormalongwithrough

46.03.2022SecondCrime Ex.P.16: sketch.

FORDEFENCE: _Nil-

MATERIAL

OBJECTS:

SpY « sR 1 ADDITION,

Se

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

FAC:SPECIALSESSIONSJUDGE,

POCSOCOURT,

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

K

oh?

N

Fair17of 2023

lofS.C.No.19

COURTOFTHESPL.SESSIONSJUDGE,FASTTRACK

IN THE

COURTFOREXPEDITIOUSTRIALANDDISPOSALOFRAPE

SPECIAL

ANDPOCSOCASESATRAJANNASIRCILLA.

>

PRESENT:B.PUSHPALATHA, ! ADDL.SESSIONSJUDGE,

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

FAC:Spl.SessionsJudge,

for ExpeditiousTrial& FTSCourt DisposalofRapeandPOCSOActCases,

RajannaSircilla.

6" day of November,2025 Thursday,thisthe

SESSIONSCASE(POCSO)NO.19OF2023

throughSub DivisionalPolice!

/Name

of thecomplainantTheState Sircilla(CrimeNo.415of2022of; |Officer, 'P.S.Sircilla).

'VaddepellyPraveen,SloGovardhan,|

Descriptionof the accused

Aged:Caste:Padmashali,.

24years,

118,:

Occu:Compounder,R/oH.No.10-6- B.Y. Nagar,Sircilla. i

493, 376(2)(n),.

ChargesUnderSections366,496, n

5(1)rAv6(2) of}

344of 1.P.CandSection .Sexual’

ProtectionofChildrenfrom

;1OffencesAct,2012.

Pleaof the accused:,-

{Not guilty.|

= |

of the Court

Finding

|,Not guilty.

:

is found not guilty

“Sentence|The

accusedforthe: order or iloffencespunishableunderSections366,

376(2)(n),344 of 1.P.C and

|496,493,

a

Fair

20f17S.C.No.19of 2023

Sectionof Protectionof

5(1)rv6(1)

Act, 2012

ChildrenfromSexualOffences

acquitted under!

andaccordingly,heis

bail bonds|

Section235(1)CrP.C.The

shall!

andsuretybondsoftheaccused a period of six remainin forceformonths i fromtodaySection437-ACr.P.c. asper |

‘ProsecutionSriPentaSrinivas,

conductedby

: Spl.PublicProsecutor.

: Defenceconductedb'Sri V.Sadanandam, yu :Advocatefor theaccused.

is coming

Thisbefore04.11.2025for finalhearing casemeon in theof SriPentaSrinivas,Spl.PublicProsecutorfortheState presence andofSriV.Sadanandam,Advocatefortheaccused,perusingthe upon materialrecord,hearingtheargumentsandthematter papersonupon havingstoodforconsiderationtill thisday,theCourtdeliveredthe over

following:

JUDGME

1)TheSubDivisionalPoliceOfficer,Sircillahasfiledchargesheet againsttheaccusedin CrimeNo.415of2022fortheoffencespunishable underSections376(2)(n),363,344,493,496ofI.P.CandSection5(1)rAv 6(1)ofProtectionofChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct,ofSircilla 2012

PoliceStation.

of?

YA

Fair3of17S.C.No.19of 2023

2.01)

of the

that20.10.2022at2100 Thebrieffactscaseareon

the defacto-complainant/L.W.1/maternaluncleof victimgirl/L.W.4/xxx

hours,

thatniece,ie.,victimgirl/L.W.4/xxx

lodgedcomplaintstatinghis

a

and ‘stayingat

home.On19.10.2022at1000 completedherIntermediate

thatshegoingSamudralingapur

hours,hisnieceinformedtohimwasto he telephonedhisniece thedayat1100hours,whento village.Onsame phoneswitched-off.Heinformed mobileNo.7661893307,hermobilewas

of his nieceand

madeeffortstotraceouthis

parentsthey

thetothe same

They expressed suspiciontheaccused.

niece,butin-vain.over

the above complaint,

theL.W.19/B.CheenaNayak,

2.02)Basing

on registeredin CrimeNo.415of of Police,Sircillahascase SubInspectora

took-upinvestigation.Duringthe

underSection3631.P.Candcourse 2022

examinedand

of investigation,recordedthestatementofL.W.1. L.W.19 ofL.W.10/GajulaSureshand L.W.19securedthepresence Later,

its surroundings

observedtheof crimeand L.W.iL/GonteSrinivas,scene detailsformandflashedRadio _ andincorporatedthedetailsincrime noticeall theconcernedofficers. Messageandlook-outto 02.12.2022at1500 Whiletheeffortsinprogress,on 2.03)were

Fair

4of17S.C.No.19of 2023

L.W.4SakhiCentre,a requestto provide toSircillawithshelter.L.W.19 got

L.W.5/G.Apporva, wt

recordedthestatementof victimgirl/L.W.4 through atSakhiCentre,Sircillaunderthevideographywiththehelpof L.W.6/

KamarapuVenu.L.W.19collectedofS.S.C copyMemoofthevictimgirl andS.S.CMemo,sheis minorgirl. According aspertothestatementof victimgirlandherdateof birth,altered asperL.W.19thesectionoflaw fromSection363I.P.CtoSections376(2)(n), 344,493,496I.P.Cand

Section5(1)r/w6(1)ofProtectionofChildrenfrom SexualOffencesAct, 2012.

2.04)Subsequently,L.W.20/A.ViswaPrasad,SubDivisional

Police

Officer, Sircilla, took-upfurtherinvestigation,

verifiedtheinvestigationdone byL.W.19andfoundit onlines. correctL.W.20proceededfirstof toscene offencesituatedatoldbusstand,Sircillaandobserved theof crime scene

its surroundings.

andL.W.20referredthevictim

girl/L.W.4/xxxtotheLady

MedicalOfficer,GovernmentDistrict Hospitaltoconductmedical

examinationthevictimgirlandfor report.L.W.14/Dr.E.ChandrikaReddy,

on

LadyMedicalOfficerconductedmedical examinationthevictimgirland on

preservedmaterialobjects,i.e., vaginalswab,

vaginalslides,washand ubichairforonwardtransmissionto R.F.S.L.,

Karimnagarfor examination

NS&

“

Fair5 ofS.C.No.19of 2023 17

girliscarrying

anddisclosedthatthevictimpregnancy,

andreportreport

ple.8 weeksGestationalage.

proceededsecondofoffence 2.05)Subsequently,L.W.20toscene at Balanagar,andvisitedtheof crimesituated locatedSecunderabadscene confinedthevictimgirlandcommitted H.No.6-5-115,wheretheaccused at observedtheofcrimeandits sexualassaulther.L.W.20scene on detailsincrimedetailsforminthe

surroundingsandincorporatedits

andL.W.13/Barma_Laxmaiah. ofL.W.12/MargamVenkatesh presence

is neighbour

L.W.8/GolaSrinivaswhoof L.W.20securedtheof presence

owner/L.W.9/AdimallaNageshwho

rentedofaccusedandhouse room examinedandrecordedtheirstatements.Later, rentbasis, gaveroomon of thevictimgirl/L.W.4/xxxfrom collecteddateofbirthcertificate L.W.20

of birth

andthethedate L.W.7/S.Venkatachary,HeadMasteraspersame, 8 days)andsheis minor girlis 12.08.2005(17 years2 months of thevictim thedateof offence. on reliableinformation,L.W.20 2.06)Whileeffortsinprogress,on were

Sircillaandapprehendedthe L.W.19proceededtoB.Y.Nagar, alongwith hoursandinterrogation,the at his house03.12.2022at1600on accusedon offence.Later,theaccused confessedto havecommittedthewas cused

fowe

hpeS * WO

Fairof 2023

6 of17S.C.No.19 broughttoPoliceStation,Sircilla,effectedhisarrestandsenthimto

for repory.

GovernmentHospital,Sircillaforconductingpotencytestand

L.W.15/Dr.KrishnaTeja,DutyMedicalOfficerconductedmedical examinationtheaccusedandissuedpotencycertificateopiningthat on

is nothingperformis

“theretosuggestthathecannotsexualactandhe

potent”.

2.07)Subsequently,thematerialobjectsR.F.S.L.,

L.W.20sentto

Karimnagarandreporthasbeenreceived,whereinit wasopinedthatitems i,2,3and4examined,isdetectedinitems1and3but aresemen spermatozoaisnotdetected,andspermatozoanotdetectedin semenare

On a

items2and4”.requisition,L.W.18/Smt.K.Sowjanya,Judicial

MagistrateofFirstClass,Sircillarecordedthestatementofvictim

girl/L.W.4/xxxunderSection164Cr.P.C.

2.08)therepresentationof parentsof victim

Asandthe perasper

of the

directionsoftheCourt,teamofdoctorsterminatedthe pregnancy victimgirl.Thebloodsamplesof accusedandvictimtakenforD.N.A were profileanda reporthasbeenreceived,whereinit wasopinedthatthereis amplifiableDNAyieldfromitemitemNo.3,theDNAprofileobtainedfrom no

No.4(Brownishturbidliquid)istheDNAprofileofmother sameas

oy

xvan

Fair

7 of17S.C.No.19of 2023

sample(sourceof itemNo.1)andcomparisonwithprofileof accused

DNA (sourceof itemNo.2)is notpossible,hence,be given. noreportcan

2.09)

Theinvestigationestablishedthattheaccused

got

acquaintancewiththevictimgirl/L.W.4/xxx,heusedtalkwiththevictim to phonethepretextof loveandmarriageandthat19.10.2022,the overonon accusedabductedthevictimgirl,tookhertoMaiiannaTemple at

her by exchanging

Thangallapally,unlawfullymarriedgarlandsandtookthe to Balanagar, victimSecunderabadwheretheaccusedtook aroomonrent, confinedthevictiminthatandcommittedaggravatedpenetrative room

her repeatedly.

sexualassault on

2.10)Afterof investigation

completionandaftercollectingrelevant

documents,L.W.20/A.ViswaPrasad,SubDivisionalPoliceOfficer,Sircilla,

filedchargesheetagainsttheaccusedfortheoffencesunderSections rAw 6(1) of Protection 376(2)(n),363,344,493,496I.P.CandSection5(1)

the charge

of ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct,2012.Hence,sheet.

3)Thelearned|Addl.SessionsJudge,RajannaSircillatook cognizancefor theoffencesunderSections376(2)(n), 363, 344, 493,496of

rAv 6(1)

.P.CandSection5(1)ofProtectionofChildrenfromSexual

OffencesAct,2012againsttheaccused.Subsequently,this casewas 8 of178.C.No.19of 2023 Fair

both sides

4)oftheaccusedandafterhearing Onappearance chargesunderSections366,496,493,376(2){n),344of thisCourtframed

Section5(1)rw6(1)ofProtectionofChildrenfromSexual LPCand againsttheaccused,readandexplainedtohimin OffencesAct,2012over

He pleadednot guilty andbe tried. Telugu.claimedto

Duringtheoftrial,P.Ws.1to5examinedand

5)coursewere

of the prosecution.

markedbehalfTheevidenceof Exs.P.1toP.15on were

remainingwitnessesgiven-up bytheSpecialPublicProsecutorthe

wasas

of prosecution.

materialwitnessesdidnotsupportthecase of prosecutionsideevidence,theaccused

6)Afterclosurewas examinedunderSection313CrPCinrespectofincriminating appearingagainsthim.Hedeniedtheincriminating circumstances circumstancesandreporteddefenceevidencehis behalf. noon

7)Heardargumentsbothsides. on

Thepointsfor determination are:- (1)Whetherthevictimisminorthedateof ason offenceSection2(d)ofProtectionof asper ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct?

Fair

Sof17S.C.No.19of 2023 (2)Whethertheprosecutionhasprovedtheguiltof theaccusedfor theoffencespunishableunder Sections366,496,493,376(2)(n),344of LPC andSection5(1)r/w6(1)ofProtectionof ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct,2012 beyondall reasonabledoubt?

9)P.W.1,whois thedefacto-complainantandmaternaluncleof victimgirl/L.W.4/xxx,deposedthathedoesnotknowfactsofthis case.

P.W.1furtherdeposedthatwhentheywenttoPoliceStation,thePolice obtainedhis signature underEx.P.1andthathedoesnotknowthecontents ofthecomplaint.P.Ws.2and3,whoparentsof victimgirl/L.W.4/ox, are deposedthattheydonotknowtheaccusedandthattheydonotknowfacts of thisP.W.4,whois thevictimgirl, deposedthattheaccusedis her case.

husbandandthatshedoesnotknowfactsof this case.

10)P.W.5,whoistheInvestigatingOfficer,deposedthat on 20.10.2022at2100hours,L.W.19/B.CheenaNayak,SubInspectorof a complaint Police,SirciliareceivedfromP.W.1underEx.P.6,thatbasing on thesaidcomplaint,L.W.19registeredin CrimeNo.415/2022under acase

Section363|.P.CandissuedFirstInformationReportunderEx.P.7and

Fair10 of17S.C.No.19of 2023

Stand,Sircilla,securedtheof day,L.W.19rushedtoOldBuspresence next

oft

andL.W.11/GonteSrinivas,observedthe L.W.10/GajulaSureshscene andincorporateditsdetailsinCrimeDetails crimeanditssurroundings

FormunderEx.P.8.

11)deposedthatwhiletheeffortsin progress, P.W.5furtherwere thevictimgirl appearedbeforeL.W.19,that 02.12.2022at1500hours, on

Sircillaa request victimgirl/L.W.4toSakhiCentre,withto L.W.19sentthe of investigation,thatL.W.19got providesheltertoherforfurtherprocess of thevictimgirl throughL.W.5/G.Apoorva,W.S./at recordedthestatement videography,thatL.W.19collectedof SakhiCentre,Sircillaunderacopy girlandSSCsheis minorgirl SSCMemoof thevictimminorpermemo, as of victimgirl/P.W.4,L.W.19addedthe andthataccordingtothestatement

rAv 6(1)

493,496I.P.C.,Section5()of sectionoffaw376(2)(n),344, to the existing sectionof law363I.P.CunderEx.P.9. POCSOAct,2012 deposedthathetookfurtherinvestigationof

12)P.W.5furtherup verifiedtheinvestigationdonebyL.W.19andfoundit on thisproper case,

he proceededvisit

thatduringtheof furtherinvestigation,to lines,course 1% sceneof crimesituatedatoldbusstandSircillaandobservedthe the

ye

Fair11ofS.C.No.19of 2023 17 beendrawnby L.W.19,thathereferredthevictim/P.W.4totheLady up

MedicalSircillaunderof WHC-

Officer,GovernmentDistrictHospital,escort to conductmedicalexaminationthevictimandtoissuereport,that 3077on

L.W.14/Dr.E.ChandraikaReddyconductedmedicalexaminationthe over victimgirtandpreservedmaterialobjectsof thevictimie,Vaginalswab,

Vaginalslides,washandPubicHairforonwardtransmissiontoR.F.S.L., forexaminationandwelldisclosedthatthevictim Karimnagarreportasas girliscarryingGestationalthatEx.P.10is the i.e.,8 weeksage, pregnancy, preliminaryexaminationthatEx.P.11is thefinalopinion reportand

report,

thatEx.P.12is theRFSLreport.

13)P.W.5furtherdeposedthatthematerialobjectsweresentto anda reporthasbeenreceived,whereinit wasopined

R.F.S.L.,Karimnagar

examined,Semenis detectedin items1 and3 that“Items1, 2,3 and4 are butisnotdetected,SemenandSpermatozoaarenot

spermatozoa

laterheproceededvisit2"of detectedin items2 and4”,thattoscene

Secunderabadandvisitedtheof crime crimelocatedatBalanagar,scene wheretheaccusedhadconfinedthe situatedintheHouseNo.6-5-115, committedsexualassaulther,thathesecuredtwopanchas, victimandon andL.W.13/BarmaLaxmaiah,observedthe

i.e., L.W.12/MargamVenkatesh

its surroundingsminutelyandincorporatedits detailsin

of crimeand

Fair12 of

17S.C.No.19of 2023

CrimeDetailsFormunderEx.P.13,thathecollecteddateof birthcertificate

L.W.7/S.Venkatachary,Ex.P.14#

ofthevictim/P.W.4fromHeadMasterunder andthatthethedateofbirthofthevictimgirl/P.W.4is aspersame, 12.08.2005.

14)P.W.5furtherdeposedthatwhile.effortsin progress, wereon he along withB.Y. Nagar, credibleinformation,L.W.19proceededtoSircilla andapprehendedtheaccusedathishouse03.12.2022at1600hours, on thatinterrogation,theaccusedvoluntarilyconfessedtohavecommitted on thisoffence,thatlater,theaccusedbroughttoPoliceStation,Sircilla was andaffectedhisarrest,thathereferredtheaccusedtoGovernmentArea

Hospital,Sircillawithrequesttoconductmedicalhealthexamination aas wellpotencytesttheaccusedandissuereports,that ason

L.W.15/Dr.KrishnaTejaconductedmedicalexaminationandissuedreport

is being

suchtheaccusedfit forremandwellissuedpotency asasas certificatesuch“thereisnothingtosuggestthathecannotperform as sexualHeis potentandthatEx.P.15is thecertificate. act.potencyP.W.5 furtherdeposedthatrequisition,L.W.18/Smt.K.Sowjanya,Judicial ona

Magistrateof FirstClassrecordedthestatementof thevictimunderSection

164Cr.P.Candthataftercompletionofentireinvestigation,hehasfiled

Fair

13 of17S.C.No.19of 2023

(n), 363,344,493,4961.P.CandSection5(I)r/w6(1)ofProtectionof

ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct,2012.

}

15)oftheprosecutionisthat19.10.2022at Thecaseon of KonaraopetMandal,theaccusedabductedtheminor

Nizamabadvillage

victimgirl/P.W.4fixxxonthepretextofloveandmarriageandthatthe

of being

accuseddishonestlyfraudulentlywentthroughtheceremony or

the victimgirl knowing

marriedthathenotfawfullymarriedandthat towas tookthevictimgirltorentedatBalanagar,Secunderabadand hearoom

repeatedlyby confiningherin thatandthereby

committedherroom rapeon

committedaggravatedpenetrative

sexualassaulther. on itstheprosecutionhasexaminedP.Ws.1to5

16)Toprovecase,

P.W.1,whois thematernaluncleof victim andgotmarkedExs.P.1toP.15.

girl/P.W.4/xxx,deposedthathedoesnotknowfactsofthiscase.P.W.1 whentheyPoliceStation,thePoliceobtained furtherdeposedthatwentto andthathedoesknowthecontentsof the hissignatureunderEx.P.1not of victimgirl/P.W.A/xxx, deposed complaint.P.Ws.2and3,whoparents are theaccusedandthattheydonotknowfactsof this thattheydonotknow thevictimgirl, deposedthattheaccusedisher P.W.4,whois case.

L—

Fair

14 of17S.C.No.19of 2023 stateanythingagainsttheaccused.Theydeclaredhostilebythe wereas

Specid}

prosecutionandthough,theycross-examinedbythelearned

were

PublicProsecutor,nothingis elicitedfromthemin favourof theprosecution.

EvenP.Ws.1to4deniedtohavestatedbeforethePolicein Exs.P.2to as

P.5/161Cr.P.Cstatementsrespectively.

17)P.W.5is theInvestigatingOfficerin thisandhisevidence case showsaboutinvestigationdonebyhimandL.W.19/B.CheenaNayak,Sub

Inspectorof Police,Sircillavariouslevels.thematerialwitnesses atAs 4, includingthevictimgirl,didtheprosecution P.Ws.1tonotsupport case, theevidenceofP.W.5isnotsufficienttoconnecttheaccusedwiththe

allegedoffences.

18)POINTNO.1:

of Children

Section2(d)of ProtectionfromSexualOffencesAct that“childbelowof eighteen statesanypersontheyears”.To meansage establishof thevictimgirl, prosecutionhasexaminedP.W.5and agegot markedEx.P.14/Study,Conduct&DateofBirthCertificateofthevictim girl/P.W.4.Asthesaidcertificate,thedateofbirthof thevictimgirlis per of Investigating 12.08.2005.AspertheevidenceOfficer/P.W.5and asper

&

NY)

a4

Fair

15 of17S.C. No.19of 2023

was a child

offence.As such, thevictim/P.W.4definedunder asSection2(d) ofProtectionofChitdrenfromSexualOffences Act.Therefore,prosecution establishedboththroughoralanddocumentary evidencethatthe victim/P.W.4minorthedateof offence. wasonAccordingly, pointNo.1is answered.

19)POINTNO.2:

On a careful

scrutinyof theentireevidenceavailablerecord, on itisthatoftheprosecutionwitnesseshave seennonesupportedthe

prosecutionEventhevictimgirl, ie.,

case.P.W.4didnotstateanything againsttheaccused.P.W.4/victimsimplystatedthatdoesknow shenot

factsof thisTherefore,it is clearis absolutely

case.thatthereevidence no

all against

attheaccusedtoconnecthimwiththeallegedoffences.Thus, theprosecutionfailedtoestablishtheguiltofaccusedfortheoffences punishableunderSections366,496,493,376(2)(n),344ofI.P.Cand

Section5(1)rw6(1)ofProtectionofChildrenfrom SexualOffencesAct, 2012beyondall reasonabledoubtfor acquittal. andtheaccusedis entitled

PointNo.2is answeredaccordingly.

19)INTHERESULT,theaccusedisfoundguiltyforthe not offencespunishableunderSections366,496,493,376(2)(n),344ofILP.C

Fair16 ofS.C.No.19of 2023 17

is acquitted

Act,2012andaccordingly,heunderSection235(1)Cr.P.c.

for #

Thebailbondsandsuretybondsof theaccusedshallremainin force periodof six monthsfromtodaySection437-ACr.P.C. asper - |, corrected TypedtodictationbytheStenographerGradeand my

6" day of November,

pronouncedbymein theCourtthisthe2025.

openon | ADDITIONAL.SIONSJUDGE,

RAJAN!

IRCILLA.

FAC:SPECIALSESSIONSJUDGE,

POCSOCOURT,

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

APPENDIXOFEVIDENCE

WITNESSESEXAMINED

FORPROSECUTION:FENCE:

P.W-1:Maternaluncleof victim/xxx, P.W-2:Fatherof victim/xxx.---None--- P.W-3:Motherof victim/xxx. P.W-4:Victim/xxx.

P.W-5:A.Vishwaprasad,InvestigatingOfficer.

EXHIBITSMARKED: FORPROSECUTION:

Ex.P.1:a complaint.

20.10.2022Signatureof P.W.1 on

Ex.P.2:the

20.10.2022StatementofP.W.1underSection161 Cr.P.c.

21.10.2022StatementoftheP.W.2underSection161 Cr.P.c.

,ea

%

Fair

17 of17S.C. No.19of 2023

EX.P.4:21.10.2022Statementofthe PW.3underSection161 .

&

CrP.C. Ex.P.5:02.12.2022StatementoftheP.W.4 underSection161 CPC. * Ex.P.6:20.10.2022Original complaint.

Ex.P,7:20.10.2022‘FirstinformationReportin CrimeNo.415of 2022of PS.Sircilla. Ex.P.8:20.10.2022FirstCrimeDetailsalong Formwithrough sketch. Ex.P.9:02.12.2022SectionAlterationMemo.

Ex.P.10:03.12.2022PreliminaryExaminationReport.

Ex,P,11:

Finalopinion report.

- Ex.P,12:31.12.2022_R.F.S.L.Report.

Ex.P.13:03.12.2022SecondCrimeDetailsFormalongwith

rough

sketch,

Ex.P.14:03.12.2022Study,Conduct&DateofBirthCertificate of thevictimgirl/P.W.4.

Ex.P.15:.Potency

03.12.2022Certificate.

FORDEFENCE:

—-Nil-

MATERIALOBJECTS:

1 ADDITIONAIONSJUDGE,

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

FAC:SPECIALSESSIONSJUDGE,

POCSOCOURT,

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

Fair1of17 S.C.No.198of 2021

IN THECOURTOFTHESPL.SESSIONSJUDGE,

FASTTRACK

SPECIALCOURTFOREXPEDITIOUSTRIALAND

DISPOSALOFRAPE

ANDPOCSOCASESAT RAJANNASIRCILLA.

PRESENT:B.PUSHPALATHA,

(ADDL.SESSIONSJUDGE,

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

FAC:Spl.SessionsJudge,

for Expeditious

FTSCourtTrial&

Disposalof Rape

andPOCSOActCases,

RajannaSircilla.

7" day of November,

Friday,thisthe2025

SSI}Pi

0.19:

_throughInspector4 Nameof thecomplainantTheStateofPolice, Sircilla(CrimeNo.427of2019ofPS.

Sircilla).

|

Descriptionoftheaccused;jJinkaBhasker

n@BashiBabu,S/o

|.|Ramaiah,

Aged:38Caste:SC- years,

'|Madiga,Occu:PrivateSchoolTeacher,

‘RioH.No.1-197,Marrimadia,

nowat | Pragathinagar, Sircilla.

iCharges

UnderSections354,354-D,506of |"LP.C.,Sections7 r/w8 and11rw12of!

|Protection

ofChildrenfromSexual OffencesAct,2012.

Pleaof theaccusedNot guilty.

n |]

Findingof theCourtNot guilty. i

not guilty

is foundforthe.

Sentenceorder|The

oraccused

||offences

punishableunderSections

Ialangg...

|354,354-D,

tbl.ee,506 ofLP.C.,Sections

7 rhw.

20f17S.C.No.198of 2021

and“ot Protectionofi

8

11rw12

ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct,

|2012andaccordinglyheisacquitted

underSection235(1)Cr.P.C.Thebail bondsandsuretybondsof theaccused’ a period shailremainin forceforof six monthsfromtodaySection437-A asper

confiscatedto.

||CrP.C.M.O.1shallbe

theafterexpiryofappealtime.

State

be destroyedexpiryof

iM.O.2shallafter

|

appealtime.:

/ProsecutionconductedSriPentaStinivas,

by

: Spl.PublicProsecutor. : i

‘Defenceconductedby|isti Ch.MaheshGoud,

: Advocate. i is coming27.10.2025forfinalhearingin Thisbeforemeon case Srinivas,Spl.PublicProsecutorfor theStateand theof SriPenta presence

Goud,fortheaccused,perusingthe

ofSriCh.MaheshAdvocateupon record,hearingtheargumentsandthematter materialpapersupon on forconsiderationtill thisday,theCourtdeliveredthe

havingstood

over

following:

JUDGMENT

TheofPolice,PSSircillahasfiledchargesheet

1)Inspector

CrimeNo.427of2019fortheoffencespunishable t theaccusedin tions354-D,506of I.P.C.,Sections7 r/w8 and11 rw12of 354,

Fair30f17$.C.No.198of 2021

ProtectionofChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct,2012ofSircillaPolice

Station.

2.01)Thebrieffactsofthethat03.12.2019at1000 caseareon

hours,the defacto-complainant/L.W.1/father

of victimgirl/L.W.2/xxxto came

PoliceStationandlodgedcomplaintstatingthatheisresidentof a

Pragathinagar,Sircillaandhisdaughter/minorvictimgirl/L.W.2/xxxhas beenstudying10°classinSiddarthaEnglishMediumSchool,

Pragathinagar,Sircilla.TheaccusedhasbeenworkingTeacherinthe as schoolandharassinghisdaughter/L.W.2by usingobscenewords. same

his daughter

Theaccusedcollectedprivate photosofthroughhismobile phoneandblackmailingherby showingthephotos.Duetowhich same hisdaughterfellintomentaldepressionandexpressingirritationsand

On enquiry, his daughter

fearing bytheaccused.informedthemby weeping thattheaccusedhasbeenharassingandblackmailingherthathewould sendherphotostoall.Whentheyaskedtheaccused,herevolted on

Finally,herequested

them.to takeactionagainsttheaccused.

2.02)Basingtheabovecomplaint,£.W.19/M.VenkatNarsaiah,

on

Inspectorof Police,Sircillahasregisteredin CrimeNo.427of 2019 acase

Fair$.C.No.198of 2021 4of17 of investigation,L.W.19recordedthestatementofthevictim

got

course

L.W.6/S.Prameela,WomanAssistantSubInspector

girl/L.W.2/xxx through

the videographyhelpofL.W.7/Kamarapu

underwiththeVenu. of Police 2.03)Subsequently,L.W.19visitedtheofoffenceandother scene securedtheofpanchas,i.e.,L.W.11/G.Rameshand places,presencetwo detailsformof L.W.12/MandojiBhanuandpreparedcrimein thepresence gotloadedthevideographstatementof L.W.2/victim panchas.L.W.7 same

DiscandhandedthetoL.W.19.L.W.7also intoCompactoversame a issuedcertificateunderSection65-Bof IndianEvidenceAct.

a requisition,L.W.4/NagulaSanthosh,Correspondent-cum-

2.04)On

Principalof SiddarthaEnglishMediumSchoolissueddateof birthcertificate

of thevictimgirlL.W.2h<xx, in whichit is establishedthatherdateof birthis

is aged

andthedateof birthcertificate,she15 yearsand 24.11.2004per as 9 days andthedateof offence. sheisa minor ason 2.05)In thestatement,thevictim/L.W.2/xxxclearlyrevealedthatthe accuseddevelopedher,usedtocommitsexualassault coveteyeoveron herby touchingherbodyandharassedhertosendherprivateparts

Z iin aphshimthroughWhatsApp,otherwisehewouldherfail tocause

Bins

Fair

5 of 17S.C.No.198 of 2021

Section7tlw8ofPOCSO Act2012alsoattractingin arethisAs case.

such,before amemowasfiledtheCourtwith toaddthesectionoflaw underSections354,506|.P.C andSection7 rw8 ofPOCSO Act2012in thistotheF..RSections case354-DI.P.CandSection11 rfw 12 of POCSO act2012, 2.06)Whiletheefforts werein09.01.2020 progress,onat1500 hours,theL.W.19receivedreliable informationthattheaccused

appeared

beforetheSubDivisionalPolice

Officer,Sircillaforinvestigation purpose.

of investigation

Aftercompletion process,theaccusedcollectedhismobile phonefromhisrentedhouseand thetobusstandside,he onway was caughthoidbyL.W.19C.N.RKalaOn receipt nearMandirArea,Sircilla.of

requisition,theExecutiveMagistrateand

Tahsildar,Sircillahasdeputed

two

i.e., L.W.13/T.

panchas,Venkata

SwamyandL.W.14/T.ShanthiRaj

and

on interrogation,theaccusedconfessed tohavecommittedthisoffenceandin

of his confession,

pursuanceBlackandBluecolourSam-Sung aCompany

MobilephoneconsistingwithAirtel

SIMcardseizedfromthe was possessionof theaccusedunderof confession coverandseizurereportof theaccused.Aftercompletionof confessionandseizurethe report, accusedbroughttoPoliceStation,Sircilla was09.01.2020at about1730 on

Thereafter,theaccusedthé wassentto $.C.No.198of 2021 Fair6 of 17 seizeddrivefromthe remand.L.W.19alsoapen

forjudicial

Court

Nikhilintheof L.W.10/KodamSaiNikhil@presence

possessionof

requisition,

L.W.16/GajulaShiva.Ona

L.W.15/MamidalaRajuand

ofFirstClass,Korutla Kumar,JudicialMagistrate

L.W.17/Sri.J.Shyam

girl/L.W.2 under

ofthevictim examinedandrecordedthestatement

Section164Cr.PC.

of Police,Sircilla

2.07)Subsequently,L.W.20/V.AnilKumar,Inspector

L.W.19.Aftercompletionof investigationtransferof took-upfurtheron

L.W.20filedcharge andaftercollectingrelevantdocuments,

investigation

underSections354,354-D,506 theaccusedfor theoffences

sheetagainst

ofProtectionof Childrenfrom Sections7rw8and11r/w12 LP.Cand the chargesheet. SexualOffencesAct,2012.Hence,

SessionsJudge,Karimnagartook

Thelearned|Addl.

3)

Sections354,354-D,506I.P.Cand cognizancefortheoffencesunder

ProtectionofChildrenfromSexual Sections7rw8and114 r/w12of

accused.Subsequently,the

OffencesAct,2012againstthecasewas

pointofjurisdictionfor disposalaccording

theto transferredto thisCourt on

Fair

7 of 17 S.C.No.198of 2021

4)On appearanceoftheaccusedandafterhearing bothsides, thisCourtframedcharges underSections354,354-D, 506LPCand

Sections7rlw8and11rw 12ofProtectionofChildrenfrom Sexual

OffencesAct,2012against

accused,readandexplained

overtohimin

Telugu.He pleadednot guilty and

claimedto be tried.

5)Duringthe oftrial,P.Ws.14examined coursetowereand

of the prosecution.

Exs.P.1toP.12andM.Os.1& 2 markedbehalf wereon

Theevidenceofremainingwitnesses

given-upbytheSpl.Public

was

Prosecutor.

6)Afterclosureof prosecution sideevidence,theaccused was examinedunderSection313Cr.PCin

respectofincriminating

circumstancesappearingagainsthim.

Hedeniedtheincriminating circumstancesandreporteddefence evidencehisbehalf. noon

7)Heard argumentsbothsides. on

8)Thepointsfor determination are:- (1)Whetherthevictimisminordate asontheof offenceSection2(d)of asperProtectionof ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct?

A

§.C.No.198of 2021 the guilt of

the prosecutionhasproved

(2)Whether

punishableunder

accusedfortheoffences the of I.P.CandSections Sections354,354-D,506 of Protectionof Children 7 rw8 and11tlw12

2012beyondall

SexualOffencesAct, from reasonabledoubt?

andfatherofvictim

defacto-complainant

P.W.1,whoisthe

9)

of thisHefurther doesnotknowfactscase.

girl/L.W.2/xxx,deposedthathe

Policeobtainedhis PoliceStation,the deposedthatwhentheywentto thecontentsofthe thathedoesnotknow underEx.P.1and

signature

victim, deposedshedoesnotknowfacts is thethat complaint.P.W.2,who examinedandrecordedher andthatthePolicenever ofthiscase deposedthatshe motherofvictim/P.W.2, P.W.3,whoisthe statement.

Policeexaminedand ofthisandthatthenever doesnotknowfactscase recordedherstatement.

InvestigatingOfficer,deposedthat

istheon

10)P.W.4,who

Narsaiah,of Police,

L.W.19/M.VenkatInspector

03.12.2019at1000hours, basingthesaid complaintunderEx.P.5,thaton Sircillareceived a

Fair

9 of 17S.C.No.198 of 2021 thatL.W.19gotrecordedthe statementofthevictim/P.W.2through

L.W.6/S.Prameela,

WomanAssistantSubInspector ofPoliceunder

videography.

11)

P.W.4furtherdeposedthatL.W.19visited theof offence scene andpreparedcrimedetailsform anddraftedroughsketchunderEx.P.7in theofL.W.14/Gali presenceRameshandL.W,12/MandojiBhanu,that

L.W.19collecteddateof birthcertificateof the victimgirl/P.W.2underEx.P.8 andaccordingtothecertificate,herdateof birthis24.11.2004andthat basingtheofthevictim, onstatementL.W.19alteredthesectionoftaw

506 LP.Cand

underEx.P.9to Sections354, Section7 r/w8 of Protectionof

ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct.

12)P.W.4furtherdeposedthatwhile theeffortsin wereprogress, on09.01.2020at1500hours,L.W.19receivedreliable informationthatthe accusedappearedbeforetheSubDivisional PoliceOfficer,Sircillafor

investigationAftercompletion

purpose.ofinvestigationthe process, accusedcollectedhismobilephonefromhisrented houseandthe onway tobusstandside,hecaughtholdbyL.W.19 wasnearC.N.RKalaMandir

Area,Sircilla,

thatinterrogation,theaccusedconfessed onaboutthe

ionof offence,a requisition,

thattheExecutiveMagistrate onand

S.C.No.198of 2021 10 of 17 Fair

Venkata

panchasi.e,L.W.13/Thunga

Jahsildar,Sircillahasdeputedtwo

RajandthatL.W.19recovered L.W.14/ThummalaShanthione Swamyand

MobilephoneunderM.O.1 colourSam-SungCompany BlackandBlue

possessionof theaccusedunder

AirtelSIMcardfromthe

consistingwith

of confessionandseizureunderEx.P.10. cover seizeddriveunder furtherdeposedthatL.W.19apen

13)P.W.4

SaiNikhil@Nikhilunder

possessionofL.W.10/Kodam

M.0.2fromthe of L.W.15/MamidalaRajuand Ex.P.11/seizurepanchanamain thepresence

requisition,L.W.17/SriJ.ShyamKumar,

L.W.16/GajulaShiva,thatona recordedthestatementofthe

MagistrateofFirstClass,Korutla

Judicial that30.6.2020,L.W.19 girl/P.W.2underSection164CrP.C.,on victim

Sircillavidefile authorizationetterfromSDPO, collected

No. 1). Samsung

dt. 22.6.2020andsubmittedtheItem

No.17/S/RFSL/2020,

collectedfromL.W.10,3)Post of theaccused,2).PenDrive

Mobilephone

and4)Postcardsizephotographsof photographsof thevictim Cardsize

HyderabadvidefileNo.SFSL accusedF.S.L.,TelanganaState, theto (TS)4376/COM/1.42/2020andthatEx.P.12is theRFSLreport.

L.W.18/Dr.N.AnitaEvangelin,Joint

P.W.4furtherdeposedthat

14)

examinedtheaboveitemNos.1to4and

TSFSL,Hyderabad

.

Fair

11 of 17 $.C.No.198of 2021 issueda reportvidefile No.COM/142/2020,

dt5.7.2020throughwhichshe

issuedreportfollows:- as - 1 is in working condition.

1).Itemnumbercall logs,

Dataregarding

chats(Instagram,native

messages,snapchat,whatsApp),emails,

contacts,

installedapplications,instant

messages,locations,images,audiofiles,

videofiles,web/internethistory

etc,(includingthedeleteddata)

retrieved fromphoneSIMcard(Airtel)contents memory,retrievedfromitemnumber 1 is givenfile properties, in softalongwithfile path, copyi.e.,file ~name, hashvalues,dateandtime stampsetc,,markedAnnexure-1, as

COM/142/2020.

2).Datapertainingtheimageswhich

totobesimilarthe appearto initemnumber-3is given personinsoftmarked copyasAnnexure-1,

COM/142/2020.Thisrelevantdataretrievedfrom itemnumber-1isalso givenin hardalongwithfile copypropertiesandwiththelistof contents retrievedfromitemnumber-1marked

Annexure-ll,COM/142/2020.

as

3).is in working

ItemNumber-2condition.Dataregardingimage file whichtobe similarto thein item appearpersonnumber-3 anditemnumber -4retrievedfromitemnumber-2isgiveninsoft alongwithfile copy

propertiesmarkedAnnexure-1,COM/142/2020.This

asrelevantdatais jivenin hard- Il, COM/142/2020. copymarkedAnnexure as

S$.C.No.198of 2021 data)retrievedformitem

(includingthedeleted

4).Allthedata ofall files,andfile alongwithlist alsogiveninsoftcopy number2is -

1 COM/142/2020.

propertiesmarkedAnnexure as- of L.W.19,hetookup

deposedthattransfer

P.W.4furtheron

15)

of investigation,

andthataftercompletion investigationof thiscase further

punishableunder

accusedfor theoffences sheetagainstthe hefiledcharge and11rw12of andSections7rw8 354-D,506I.P.C Sections354,

SexualOffencesAct2012. Protectionof Childrenfrom prior03.12.2019at theprosecutionisthatto Theof

16)case theminorvictim accusedusedcriminalforce Sircilla,theon

Pragathinagar,

harassedhersendherprivate

girl/P.W.2ixxxby touchingherbodyandto

to outragehermodestyand

by phonewithintent

parts photographstohim victim. girlonthepretextoflove usedfollowtheminor thattheaccusedto threatenedthevictimgirlwithdireconsequences andthattheaccusedalso

by phone, therebycommittedsexual

photographs

sendherprivateparts to theminorvictimgirl. assaulton hasexaminedP.Ws.1to4

theprosecution

pol)Toitscase, prove & 2. P.W.1,whois thefatherof LyBot markedExs.P.1toP.12andM.Os.1 nia knowfactsof thisHe deposedthathedoesnotcase. irl/P.W.2/xxx,

Fair

13 of 17S.C.No.198of 2021

furtherdeposedthatwhenthey

wenttoPoliceStation,thePoliceobtained

his signature

underEx.P.1andthathedoesknow notthecontentsof the

complaint.P.W.2,whois the victim, deposed

thatshedoesnotknowfacts ofthisandthatthePolice caseneverexaminedandrecordedher statement.P.W.3,whoisthemotherof victim/P.W.2, deposedthatshe doesnotknowfactsof thisandthatthe casePoliceexaminedand never recordedherstatement.P.Ws.13did tonotstateanythingagainstthe accused.Theydeclaredhostilebythe wereasprosecutionandthough, theycross-examinedbythelearnedSpl.Public wereProsecutor,nothingis elicitedfromthemin favourof theprosecution. EvenP.Ws.1to3deniedto havestatedbeforethePolicein Exs.P.2 toP.4/161Cr.P.Cstatements as

respectively.

18)P.W.4is theInvestigatingOfficerin this andhisevidence case showsaboutinvestigationdonebyhimandL.W.19/M.VenkatNarsaiah,

InspectorofPolice,Sircilla.Asthematerialwitnesses P.Ws.1to3,

includingthevictim,didtheprosecution

notsupporttheevidenceof case,

P.W.4is notsufficienttheaccusedwiththe alleged toconnectoffences.

19)POINTNO.1:

Section2(d)of Protectionof ChildrenfromSexualOffences Act 14 of 17S.C.No.198of 2021

Fair

girl, prosecutionhasexaminedP.W.4andgot establishof thevictim age of thevictimgirl/P.W.2underEx.P.8 markedBonafide& ConductCertificate ofP.W.2is 24.11.2004.It isalso thethedateofbirth andpersame, as ofInvestigatingOfficer/P.W.4and fromtheoraltestimony evident aged14andsheminor thatthevictim/P.W.2yearswason Ex.P.6/E.1.Rwas childdefinedunder ofoffence.Assuch,thevictim/P.W.2as thedatewas fromSexualOffencesAct.Therefore, Section2(d)of Protectionof Children oralanddocumentaryevidencethat

prosecutionestablishedboththrough

of offence.Accordingly, pointNo.1

victim/P.W.2minorthedate thewason is answered.

20)POINTNO,2:

On a careful

of theentireevidenceavailablerecord, scrutinyon prosecutionwitnesseshavesupportedthe itisthatofthe seennone

didanything against

prosecutionEventhevictim,i.e.,P.W.2notstate case.

simplystatedthatshedoesnotknowfactsof theaccused.P.W.2/victim is absolutelyevidenceall Therefore,it is clearthattherenoat this case.

accusedhimwiththeallegedoffences.Thus,the againstthetoconnect establishtheguiltofaccusedfortheoffences prosecutionfailedto “

Fair

15 of 17S.C.No.198 of 2021 allreasonabledoubtandthefor acquittal. accusedis entitled PointNo.2is answeredaccordingly.

21)INTHERESULT, theaccusedisfound notguiltyforthe offencespunishableunderSections 354,354-D,506of I.P.C.,Sections 7 tAw 8and11r/w12.of Protectionof ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct, 2012andaccordinglyis acquitted heunderSection235(1)Cr.P.C. Thebail bondsandsuretybandsof thea period accusedshallremainin forcefor of sixmonthsfromtodaySection asper437-ACr.P.C.M.O.1shallbe confiscatedtotheStateafterexpiryof appealtime.M.O.2shallbe

destroyedexpiryofappeal

aftertime.

TypedtodictationbytheStenographer

myGrade|,corrected - andpronouncedbymein the7" day of November, openCourtthisthe on 2025.

| ADDITION.SIONS

JUDGE,

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

FAC:SPECIALSESSIONSJUDGE,

POCSOCOURT,

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

§.C.No.198of 2021 16 of 17

Fair

APPENDIXOF EVIDENCE

WITNESSESEXAMINED

FORDEFENCE:

FOR PROSECUTION:

Fatherof victim/axx. P.W-1: --None-- P.W-2:Victim/xxx. P.W-3:Motherof victim/xxx.

InvestigatingOfficer.

P.W-4:V.AnilKumar,

HIBITSMARKED:

EOR PROSECUTION:

the complaint.

03.12.2019Signatureof P.W.1 Ex.P,1:on underSection161Cr.P.C. Statementof P.W.1 Ex.P.2:03.12.2019 underSection161Cr.P.C. Statementof P.W.2 Ex.P.3:03.12.2019 underSection161Cr.P.C.

Ex.P.4:03.12.2019Statementof P.W.3

Ex.P.5:03.12.2019Original compiaint.

in CrimeNo.427/2019 03.12.2019FirstInformationReport Ex.P.6: of PS.Sircilla.

alongwithroughsketch.

03.12.2019CrimeDetailsForm Ex.P.7: Certificateofthevictim Bonafide& Conduct Ex.P.8:09.12.2019

girl/P.W.2.

10.01.2020SectionAlterationMemo. Ex.P.9:

Confession-cum-recoverypanchanama.

Ex.P.10:09.01.2020

Ex.P.11:10.02.2020Seizurepanchanama.

Ex.P.42:05.07.2021R.F.S.L.Report.

Fair

17 of17S.C.No.198of 2021

MATERIALOBJECTS:

M.O.1:BlackandBlueColourSam-SungCompanyMobilePhone. M.O.2:PenDrive.

| ADDITIONALfONSJUDGE,

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

FAC:SPECIALSESSIONSJUDGE,

POCSOCOURT,

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

° Nf

ASaz

Fairlof158.C.No.218of 2021

IN THECOURTOFTHESPL.SESSIONSJUDGE,FASTTRACK

SPECIALCOURTFOREXPEDITIOUSTRIALANDDISPOSALOFRAPE

ANDPOCSOCASESATRAJANNASIRCILLA.

PRESENT:B.PUSHPALATHA, | ADDL.SESSIONSJUDGE,

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

FAC:Spl.SessionsJudge, for Expeditious FTSCourtTrial& Disposalof Rapeand POCSOActCases,

RajannaSircilla.

6" day of November, Thursday,thisthe2025

SESSIONSCASE(POC:NO.218OF2021

'Nameof the‘complainant

Police:

|TheStatethroughSubDivisional

Officer,Vemulawada(CrimeNo.150of

||2020of P.S.Konaraopet).

| 2

‘GamaSathish,

Description

of theaccusedS/oLaxmirajam,Aged:

: 26years,Caste:Tenugu,Occu:Auto|

:|Driver,R/oKonaraopetvillageand

Mandal. :

417, 420)

|Charges

UnderSections376(2)(n),506, ‘of1.P.CandSection5 r/w 6 of Protection! : ‘lofChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct,’

(2012,

|

an

ii _.

ic|Not guilty.

'Pleaof theaccused

[Not

|Findingof theguilty.

Courtn

guiltyforthe:

:[The

Sentenceorderaccusedisfoundnot or

‘JoffencespunishableunderSections

376(2){n), 506,417, 420

ofI.P.Cand

Fair2ofS.C.No.218of 2021 15

Section5 riwof Children’

6 ofProtection fromSexualOffencesAct,2012and

under:

accordingly,heisacquitted

Section235(1)Cr.P.C.Thebailbonds andsuretybondsoftheaccusedshall a period of six remainin forceformonths fromtodaySection437-ACr.P.C. asper

Prosecution

conductedby, SriPentaSrinivas, : Spl.PublicProsecutor.

Defence‘conductedSriK.Srinivas,

—_

by

x Advocatefor theaccused.

is comingfor finalhearing

Thisbefore24.10.2025 casemeon in theofSriPentaSrinivas,Spl.PublicProsecutorfortheState presence andofSriE.MadhusudhanRao,Advocatefortheaccused,perusing upon thematerialrecord,hearingtheargumentsandthematter papersonupon havingstoodforconsiderationtill thisday,theCourtdeliveredthe over

following:

JUDGMENT

filed charge

1)TheSubDivisionalPoliceOfficer, Vemulawadahas sheetagainsttheaccusedinCrimeNo.150of2020fortheoffences

5

punishableunderSections417,420,376(2)(n),506ofI.P.CandSection rw6ofProtectionofChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct,2012of

KonaraopetPoliceStation.

« xy ke aye

oom

Vf

Fair3of15S.C.No.218of 2021

2.01)

Thebrieffactsofthethat16.06.2020at1930 caseareon )

hours,thedefacto-complainant/L.W.1/victimgirl/xxx lodgedcomplaint

a of Konaraopet statingthatsheisresidentvillage.Shediscontinuedher studyat 8"Classduringthe2014andstayinghomeby doingcoolie yearat work.Theaccusedwhoalreadymarriedusedtofollowherand was believedherwithdeceitfulwordsthathewouldherandsexually marry exploitedherforthelastfourmonths.Further,theaccusedthreatenedher kill herif shedisclosestheto anybody. withdiretomatter consequences to fear,shedidrevealtheandsheis pregnant. Duenotmattertoanyone

Onthat,sherevealedthemattertoherparentswhoaskedtheaccusedto her,butherefused. marry

2.02)Basingtheabovecomplaint,theL.W.22/B.Parsharamulu,

on

SubInspectorof Police,Konaraopethasregisteredin CrimeNo.150 acase of2020underSections417,420,376,506of1.P.CandissuedExpress

F.LRstoalltheconcerned.Subsequently,L.W.23/N.NaveenKumar,Circle of Police,VemulawadaRuraltook-upinvestigation.L.W.23got

Inspector

girl/L.W.1/xxx _ through

recordedthestatementofthevictim

L.W.21/V.Soumya,WomanSubInspectorofPolice,VemulawadaRural

Later,

Fairof 2021

4of15S.C.No.218

L.W.23referredthevictimgirl/L.W.1/xxxtoGovernmentHospital,Sircillafor medicalexaminationandreport.

2.03)Subsequenily,L.W.23visitedtheofoffencesituatedat scene

Konaraopetvillage,observedtheandpreparedcrimedetailsform scene

alongwithroughsketchof L.W.13/GudamDharmaputi

in theand presence

L.W.14/VasalaBapuReddy.L.W.23collecteddateof birthcertificateof the victimgirlfromL.W.9/DusaRaghupathi,HeadMaster,ZPHSSchool,

Konaraopetwhichdisclosedthatthedateofbirthofthevictimgirlis

is aged

20.02.2002andshe17 years10monthsat thetimeof offence.

2.04)L.W.15/P.Manasa,LadyMedicalOfficer,GovernmentHospital,

Sircillaexaminedthevictimgir/L.W.1/xxxandissuedmedicalexamination reportopiningthat“aftercarefulexaminationof thevictim,it is foundthat

2 days

chemicaltestpositiveandUSGScanshows20weeksof pregnancy

gestationalage”.Basingthedateof birth of thevictimgirlandmedical

on report,L.W.23alteredthesectionoflawfromSections417,420,376,506

LP.CtoSections417,420,376(2)(n)(3)I..CandSection5r/w6of

Protectionof ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct,2012.

2.05)Subsequently,L.W.24/S.Chandrakanth,SubDivisionalPolice

fficer, Vemulawada,took-uptheinvestigation.Duringtheof

course igation,L.W.24visitedtheof offenceatKonaraopet,observed scene

be

FairSof15S.C.No.218of 2021 crimedetailsform.On18.06.2020,accused thebutdidnotprepare scene, houseofvictimandinsultedand alongwithhisparentswenttothe to why theyfiledagainstthe humiliatedtheparentsof thevictimcase as victimgirl disgustedwithhislifeand accused,which,fatherof upon andin CrimeNo.152of2020under committedsuicideby hangingcase a

registeredagainstthe

Section306riv34|.P.CofP.S.Konaraopetwas

his parents.

accusedand in22.06.2020at0700 2.06)Whiletheeffortswereprogress,on apprehendedtheaccusedalongwith hours,reliableinformation,L.W.22 on his parentsin CrimeNo.152of 2020of PS.Konaraopet whoinvolved were confessedhavecommittedthisoffence. andinterrogation,accusedto on of theaccusedalongwith his confession,L.W.22effectedarrest

Basing

on andgotconducted his parentsin CrimeNo.152of 2020of P.S.Konaraopet in CrimeNo.150of 2020of P.S.Konaraopet. theaccused potencyteston

DistrictHospital,Sircilla

L.W.16/Dr.Rajesh,CivilAssistantSurgeon,

certificateopiningthat“thereis examinedtheaccusedandissuedpotency performsexualact.Later,the to suggestthattheaccusedcannot

nothing

for judicial remandin CrimeNo.152of 2020 accusedsenttotheCourt was accusedproducedin thisCourt andthereafter,thewas ofP.S.Konaraopet

Ay ee 4

La

Fair

6 of15S.C.No.218of 2021

2.07)Onrequisition,L.W.17/SriJ.ShyamJudicial

aKumar,

MagistrateofFirstClass,Korutlarecordedtheof

statementthevictim girl/L.W.1/xxxunderSection164Cr.P.C.Asthemedicalscanning per reports,terminationofcouldnotbedonethe pregnancyaspregnancy the victim-gave birtha baby boy. crossed20weeks.On09.10.2020, toAs perthedirectionsof theCourt,D.N.Aprofiletestconductedand wasasper thereport,theaccusedis thebiologicalfatherof malechildof victim/L.W.1.

Aftercompletionofinvestigationandaftercoliectingrelevant allthe documents,L.W.24/S.Chandrakanth,SubDivisionalPolice Officer,

Verulawadahasfiledchargesheetagainsttheaccusedfortheoffences

punishableunderSections417,420, 376(2)(n),

506of 1.P.CandSection5 tw6 of Protectionof ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct,2012. Hence,the

chargesheet.

3)Thefearned| Addl.SessionsJudge, Karimnagartookthe case file for theoffencesunderSections417,420, 376(2)(n), 506 onof I.P.Cand

Section5r/w6 ofProtectionof ChildrenfromSexual OffencesAct,2012 againsttheaccused.Subsequently,this casetransferredtothisCourt was

the point of jurisdictionfor disposal

onaccordingto law.

7of15S.C,No.218of 2021 Fair accusedandafterhearingbothsides,

4)Onofthe appearance + Sections376(2)(n),506,417,420ofI.P.C thisCourtframedchargesunder

ProtectionofChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct, andSection5rAw 6of in Telugu. accused,readandexplainedtohimHe 2012againsttheover pleadedguiltyandclaimedtobetried. not 3examinedand

5)Duringtheoftrial,P.Ws.1towere course behalfof theprosecution.Theevidenceof Exs.P.1toP.12markedon were

SpecialPublicProsecutorthe remainingwitnessesgiven-upbytheas was

of prosecution.

didnot supportthe materialwitnessescase of prosecutionsideevidence,theaccused Afterclosurewas

6)

inrespectofincriminating

examinedunderSection313CrP.C deniedtheincriminating

appearingagainsthim.He

circumstances reporteddefenceevidencehisbehalf. circumstancesandon no

Heardargumentsbothsides.

7)on

Thepointsfor determination

8)are:- victimisminorthedateof (1)Whethertheason Section2(d)ofProtectionof offenceasper ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct? y=

wit

.at

‘>

Fair

8 of15S.C. No.218of 2021

(2)the prosecutionthe guilt of

Whetherhasproved r theaccusedfortheoffencespunishableunder Sections376(2)(n),506,417,420LPCand Section5r/w6ofProtectionofChildrenfrom y SexualOffencesAct,2012beyondall reasonabledoubt? ' is the defacto-complainant

9)P.W.1,whovictim, deposed andthat shedoesnotknowfactsof thisP.W.1furtherdeposedthatwhen case.they wenttoPoliceStation,thePoliceobtainedhersignatureunder Ex.P.1and thatshedoesnotknowthecontentsof thecomplaint. P.W.2,whois the motherof victim/P.W.1, deposedthatshedoesknowfactsof this notcase.

10)P.W.3,whoistheInvestigatingOfficer,deposed that on 16.06.2020at1930hours,L.W.22/B.Parsharamulu,Sub Inspectorof

Police,Konaraopeta complaint

receivedunderEx.P.4,thatbasingthe on

saidcomplaint,L.W.22registeredin Crime

acaseNo.150of 2020under

Sections417,420, 376(2)(n),506and 1.P.CSection5 rAw 6 of Protectionof

ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct,2012andissued FirstInformation

ReportunderEx.P.5andthatL.W.23/N.Naveen Kumar,CircleInspectorof

Police,VerulawadaRuralgotrecordedthe statementof thevictim/P.W.1 throughL.W.21/V.Soumya,WomanSub InspectorofPolice,Vernulawada

the videography.

Ruralunder

y “a0 _

Watang gs &

ae

Fair9 ofS.C.No.218of 2021 15

11)P.W.3furtherdeposedthatL.W.23visitedtheof offence scene

;

andpreparedcrimedetailsformanddraftedroughsketchunderEx.P.6in theofL.W.13/GudemDharmapuriandL.W.14/VasalaBapu presence

Reddy,thatL.W.23collecteddateof birthcertificateof thevictimgirl!under fromL.W.9/DusaRaghupathiandtherecords,thedateof Ex.P.7asper of thevictim/P.W.1is 20.02.2002,thatL.W.23referredthevictimgirlto birth

_that

GovernmentHospital, Sircillaformedicalexamination,

L.W.15/Dr.P.Manasaexaminedthevictimandissuedpreliminary examinationunderEx.P.8,thatEx.P.9istheFLSReportandthat report finalopinion reportwhereinopinedthat“aftercareful Ex.P.10is thewas examinationof thevictim,-it wasfoundthatthatchemicaltest pregnancy 2 days of Gestationalandthat positiveandUSGScanshows20 weeksage thedateof birthcertificateandmedicalreportthevictim,L.W.23

basing

on thesectionoflawfromSections417,420,376,506I.P.Cto altered 376(2)(n)(3)I.P.CandSection6rw5(i)(ii)(1)of Sections417,420,

Protectionof ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct,2012.

he took-upthe investigation,verified

12)P.W.3furtherdeposedthat & 23andfoundit oncorrectlines,that theinvestigationdonebyL.Ws.22on

Aosais

alongwithhisthreatenedthevictimwith an’88Q6.2020theaccusedparents

x

ung,ow

;

Yuin

RSbe

4

*nes

SS

Fair

10 of15S.C.No.218of 2021 direandabusedher,thatthefatherofvictimcommitted consequences suicideby hangingtotreeandthatheregisteredagainstthe aacase accusedandhisparentsin CrimeNo.152of 2020underSection306r/w34

I.P.Cof P.S.Konaraopet.

13)P.W.3furtherdeposedthat22.06.20200700hours, onaton reliableinformation,heapprehendedtheaccusedalongwithhis parents, thatinterrogation,accusedconfessedhavecommittedtheoffence, onto thathesenttheaccusedtoGovernmentHospitalformedicalexamination, thatL.W.16/Dr.Rajeshexaminedtheaccusedandissuedcertificate

potency

is nothing

underEx.P.12opiningthat“theretosuggestthathe cannot

performis potent,his requisition,

sexualact,hethatL.W.17/SriJ.Shyam on

Kumar,JudicialMagistrateof FirstClass,Korutlarecordedthestatementof victimgirlunderSection164Cr.P.Candthataftercompletion of investigation,hefiledchargesheetagainsttheaccusedfortheoffences

rw 6

underSections417,420,376(2)(n),506I.P.CandSection 5of

Protectionof ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct,2012.

14)Theoftheprosecutionisthatsincefive casetosixmonths priorto16.06.2020Konaraopetvillage,theaccused atcommitted rapeon theminervictimgirl/P.W.1 aged17+repeatedlywithdeceitful yearswords

9S”

ee

7%

Fair

lof15S.C.No.218of 2021 shebirthtobaby boyandthatthereaftertheaccusedrefusedto gavea herandthreatenedherwithdiretokillherif she marryconsequences j revealsthematterto any one.

15)ToitstheprosecutionhasexaminedP.Ws.1to3 provecase,

P.W.1,whois thevictim, deposedthatshe andgotmarkedExs.P.1toP.12.

doesknowfactsofthisP.W.1furtherdeposedthatwhenthey notcase.

PoliceStation,thePoliceobtainedhersignatureunderEx.P.1and wentto thatshedoesknowthecontentsof thecomplaint.P.W.2,whois the not motherof victim/P.W.1,deposedthatshedoesnotknowfactsof this case.

P.Ws.1and2didnotstateanythingagainsttheaccused.They were

hostilebytheprosecutionandthough,they

declaredwerecross- as examinedbythelearnedSpecialPublicProsecutor,nothingis elicitedfrom

“Even P.Ws.1

themin favourof theprosecution.and2deniedtohave statedbeforethePoliceinExs.P2andP.3/161Cr.P.Cstatements as

respectively.

is theInvestigatingOfficerin thisandhisevidence

16)P.W.3case investigationdonebyhim,L.W.22/B.Parsharamulu,Sub showsabout andL.W.23/N.NaveenKumar,Circle

InspectorofPolice,Konaraopet

of Police,VemulawadaRuralvariouslevels.Asthematerial inspectorat

Fair12 of15S.C.No.218of 2021 prosecutiontheevidenceofP.W.3isnotsufficienttoconnectthe case, accusedwiththeallegedoffences.

17)POINTNQ.1:

Section2(d)of Protectionof ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct

of eighteen

that“childbelowtheyears”.To statesmeansanypersonage establishofthevictimgirl, prosecutionhasexaminedP.W.3andgot age markedEx.P.7/Study,Conduct&DateofBirthCertificateofthevictim girl/P.W.1.Asthesaidcertificate,thedateof birthof thevictimgirlis per

of Investigatingand

20.02.2002.AstheevidenceOfficer/P.W.3per peras

FirstInformationReport,thevictimis below18 yearsthedateof offence. on such,thevictim/P.W.1childdefinedunderSection2(d)of Aswasaas

ProtectionofChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct.Therefore,prosecution establishedboththroughoralanddocumentaryevidencethatthe victim/P.W.1minorthedateof offence.Accordingly, pointNo.1is wason answered.

18)POINTNO.2:

Oncarefulscrutinyof theentireevidenceavailablerecord, aon itisthatoftheprosecutionwitnesseshavesupportedthe seennone prosecutionEventhevictimgirl, ie.,P.W.1didnotstateanything case.

Fair13 of15S.C.No.218of 2021

is absolutely

factsof thisTherefore,it is clearthatthereevidence case.no ali against attheaccusedtoconnecthimwiththeallegedoffences.Thus, ) theprosecutionfailedtoestablishtheguiltofaccusedfortheoffences punishableunderSections376(2)(n), 506,417,420of I.P.CandSection5 tw6 ofProtectionof ChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct,2012beyondall

for acquittal.

reasonabledoubtandtheaccusedisentitledPointNo.2is

answeredaccordingly.

19)INTHERESULT,theaccusedisfoundnotguiltyforthe offencespunishableunderSections376(2)(n),506,417,420ofI.P.Cand

Section5 r/w6 of ProtectionofChildrenfromSexualOffencesAct,2012

is acquitted

andaccordingly,heunderSection235(1)Cr.P.C.Thebail a period of bondsandsuretybondsof theaccusedshallremainin forcefor

from todaySection

sixmonths437-ACr.P.C. asper - |, corrected

bytheStenographer

TypedtodictationGradeand my 6" day of November,

pronouncedbymein theCourtthisthe2025.

openon | ADDITIONASIONSJUDGE,

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

FAC:SPECIALSESSIONSJUDGE,

POCSOCOURT,

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

Fair14 ofS.C.No.218of 2021 15

IX OFEVIDENCE

AP

WIEXAMINED

EORPROSECUTION:FORDEFENCE:

P.W-1:Victim/xxx. P.W-2:Motherof victimn/xxx.---None--- : P.W-3:S.Chandrakanth,InvestigatingOfficer.

EXHIBITSMARKED: FORPROSECUTION:

a complaint. Ex.P,1:16.06.2020Signatureof P.W.1 on

Ex.P.2:oftheunderSection161

18.06.2020StatementPW.1 CrP.C. Ex.P.3:ofthePW.2underSection161 17.06.2020Statement CrP.c.

Ex.P.4:16.06.2020Original complaint. Ex.P.5:‘FirstInformationinCrimeNo.150of 16.06.2020Report 2020of P.S.Konaraopet. Ex.P.6:16.06.2020CrimeDetailsFormalongwithroughsketch.

Ex.P.7:18.06.2020Study,Conduct&DateofBirthCertificateof thevictimgirl/P.W.1.

Ex.P.8:‘PreliminaryExamination

17.06.2020Report.

Ex.P.9:22.01.2021F.S.L.Report.

Ex.P.10:FinalOpinion report. - Ex.P.11:18.06.2020SectionAlterationMemo.

Ex.P.12:22.06.2020Potencycertificate.

FORDEFENCE:

—-Nil--

%

Loita

Bp,

ape*SOU

RS3

a

Fair15 of15S.C.No.218of 2021

MAIAL, OBJ

:

/ sosltiay,

»

| ADDITION.SSIONSJUDGE, *SRI

RAJANNASIRCILLA.

FAC:SPECIALSESSIONSJUDGE,

POCSOCOURT,

RAJANNASIRCILLA.