Sri V.Srinivasa Rao, M.A., M.L.,

Senior Civil Judge, Bhimavaram.

III ADJ Court Complex, Bhimavaram · West Godavari · Andhra Pradesh

Sri V.Srinivasa Rao, M.A., M.L.,, Senior Civil Judge, Bhimavaram., is posted at III ADJ Court Complex, Bhimavaram, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh, India. 3,291 court orders on record since 2015. 8 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, EP, H cases.

3,291

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

OS/198/2018

Valavala Peddintlamma vs Pathi Dhana Lakshmi

02 May 2019

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE :: BHIMAVARAM

PRESENT :- SRI V.SRINIVASA RAO,

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

Thursday, the 2nd day of May,2019

O.S.No.198/2018

Between :

Valavala Peddintlamma … Plaintiff.

And

1. Pathi Dhana Lakshmi

2. Pathi Satyanarayana

3.Pathi Sattibabu... Defendants.

This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of

Sri S.Manikyala Rao, Advocate for the Plaintiff; and the Defendants remained exparte and having stood over the matter for consideration to this day, this Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

This is a suit filed under Section 26, Order 7, Rule 1 of C.P.C., for declaration that the plaint schedule property belonging to the plaintiff, and for possession of the same by evicting the 1st defendant from the said property and for costs of the suit.

2. The brief averments of the plaint are as follows:

The 1st defendant and one Pathi Venkanna are parents of the plaintiff and the defendants Nos.2 and 3.

An extent of Ac.0-52 cents of wet land in R.S.No.189/3C, present supplementary R.S.No.189/3C-1 of Kuppanapudi village is self acquired property of Pathi Venkanna. The said Pathi Venkanna executed a will on 21-4-2014 in a sound and disposing state of mind, bequeathed the plaint schedule property, in favour of the plaintiff, which is the last and final testament. Subsequently, the said Pathi Venkanna died on 1-6-2014. After the death of the said Venkanna, the plaint schedule property is devolved on the plaintiff with absolute rights.

Thereafter the plaintiff demanded the 1st defendant to deliver the said property to 2 her, but the 1st defendant had postponed the same on some pretext or other. The 1st defendant is getting income derived from the said land and on mercy, the plaintiff allowed the 1st defendant to enjoy the income over the said land.

Recently, the plaintiff demanded the 1st defendant to hand over the schedule property. The 1st defendant tried to alienate the said property in favour of

Vadapati Shankaram of Akividu by creating collusive agreement of sale with a malafide intention to get unlawful gain. Hence the plaintiff got issued a registered legal notice dated 28.5.2018 to the 1st defendant and the said Vadapati

Shankaram and sent a copy of the said notice to the Sub-Registrar, Akividu stating that not to register any sale deeds in respect of the said land.

After receipt of the said notice, the 1st defendant colluded with the 2nd and 3rd defendants fabricated a collusive registered partition deed dated 3-7-2018 in respect of the said land, alleging that the said Pathi Venkatanna executed an alleged will dated 12-4-2014 in their favour in respect of the said land; and that the said land is fell to the share of the 1st defendant and the alleged cash was taken by the 2nd and 3rd defendants to their alleged share. The said Pathi

Venkanna never executed the alleged will dated 12-4-2014 and the alleged will is forged by the defendants for the purpose of creating the said collusive partition deed and that the alleged partition deed dated 12-4-2014 is not enforcible by law.

Hence the suit.

3. The defendants Nos. 1 to 3 did not appear before the court, they were set exparte on 12-10-2018.

4. In support of the case, the Plaintiff examined P.Ws.1 to 3 and got marked Exs.A-1 to A-7. Plaintiff Valavala Peddintlamma was examined as P.W.1,

Peketi Subba Rao, Bandaru Manikyalarao, G.Narasaveni were examined as

P.Ws.2 to 4 . Ex.A-1 is Unregistered Original will dated 21-4-2014, Ex.A-2 is the

Office copy of Legal notice dated 28-5-2018, Ex.A-3 is Postal Acknowledgement from 1stdefendant, Ex.A-4 is returned postal cover from Vadapati

Sankaram,Ex.A-5 is the postal acknowledgement addressed to the Sub 3 Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Akividu, Ex.A-6 is the Death Certificate of Pathi

Venkanna dated 1-6-2014, Ex.a-7 is Certified copy of partition deed dated 3-7- 2018 vide Doct. NO.2226/2018 SRO, Akividu.

5. Heard the Counsel for the Plaintiff.

6. The Point for consideration is:

Whether the Plaintiff is entitled for the relief as claimed

for?

7. P O I N T:-

This plaintiff filed the suit for Declaration stating that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of the plaint schedule property and for the possession of the same by evicting the 1st defendant from the said property. The plaintiff in support of the case examined P.Ws.1 to 4. P.Ws.1 to 4 chief affidavits are reiterating the plaint averments, they are needless to produce.

8. It can be seen from the record, the 1st defendant and one Pathi Venkanna are parents of the plaintiff and the defendants Nos.2 and 3. Pathi Venkanna executed a will on 21-4-2014 in a sound and disposing state of mind bequeathed the plaint schedule property, in favour of the plaintiff, which is the last and final testament. Subsequently, the said Pathi Venkanna died on 1-6-2014. The plaint schedule property is self acquired property of the said

Pathi Venkanna. Thereafter the plaintiff demanded the 1st defendant to deliver the said property to her, but the 1st defendant had postponed on some pretext or other.

9. The 1st defendant colluded with the 2nd and 3rd defendants fabricated a collusive registered partition deed dated 3-7-2018 in respect of the said land, alleging that the said Pathi Venkatanna executed an alleged will dated 12-4-2014 in their favour in respect of the said land; and that the said land is fell to the share of the 1st defendant and the alleged cash was taken by the 2nd and 3rd defendants to their alleged share. The alleged partition deed dated 12-4-2014 4 is not enforcible by law. The defendants did not appear before this court and did not take any efforts to disprove the contention of the plaintiff.

10. The plaintiff to substantiate his contention examined as

P.Ws.1 to 4, Exs.A-1 to A-7 marked. The plaintiff to prove Ex.A-1 will examined

P.W.4, who is an attestor, hence the plaintiff discharged his burden rests on him under Sec.68 of Indian Evidence Act.

11. The defendants not appear before the court and not filed written statement. In the light of above circumstances, I am of the view that the evidence of the P.Ws.1 to 4 are trustworthy and believable because their evidence also supported by documentary evidence of Exs.A.1 to A.7. Hence, plaintiff is entitled for the relief .

12. In the result, the suit is decreed with costs by declaring that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of the plaint schedule property and directed the 1st defendant to hand over the plaint schedule property to the plaintiff within three months, failing which the plaintiff is at liberty to proceed according to law.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court, this the 2 nd day of May, 2019.

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

BHIMAVARAM.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF : FOR DEFENDANTS : P.W.1 : Valavala Peddintlamma - N O N E – P.W.2 : Peketi Subba Rao P.W.3 : Bandaru Manikyalarao P.W.4 : G.Narasaveni

DOCUMENTS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF : Ex.A-1/ dated 21-4-2014: Unregistered Original will,

Ex.A-2/ dated 28-5-2018: Office copy of Legal notice

Ex.A-3/dt.--: Postal Acknowledgement from 1st defendant,

Ex.A-4/dt.--: Returned postal cover from Vadapati Sankaram.

Ex.A-5/dt.:Postal acknowledgement addressed to the Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Akividu,

Ex.A-6/ dated 1-6-2014: Death Certificate of Pathi Venkanna,

Ex.A-7/ dated 3-7-2018: Certified copy of partition deed vide Doct. NO.2226/2018 SRO, Akividu. FOR DEFENDANTS : - N I L -

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

BHIMAVARAM.

OS/275/2018

Digamarthi Venkata Surya Kondala Rao vs Digamarthi Bhavani

01 May 2019

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE :: BHIMAVARAM

PRESENT :- SRI V.SRINIVASA RAO,

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

Wednesday, the 1st day of May, 2019

O.S.No.275/2018

Between : Digamarthi Venkata Surya Kondala Rao … Plaintiff.

and

1. Digamarthi Bhavani

2. Digamarthi Srinivas

3. Ayinaparthi Mutyavani

4. Ballari Durga... Defendants.

This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of

Sri D.Srinivasarao, Advocate for the Plaintiff; and the Defendants Nos.1 to 4 are called absent and remained exparte and having stood over the matter for consideration to this day, this Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

This is a suit filed under Section 26, Order 7, Rule 1 of C.P.C., for

Specific performance of the suit agreement of sale deed dated 3-1-2018 by directing the defendants 1 to 4 to execute a register sale deed for the plaint schedule property of the defendants 1 to 4 in favour of plaintiff, failing which the plaintiff is at liberty to proceed according to law.

2. The brief averments of the plaint are as follows:

The 2nd defendant is the son and the defendants 3 and 4 are the daughters of 1st defendant and late Digamarthi Venkateswarulu @ Bangarayya.

Late Digamarthi Venkateswrulu @ Bangaryya and 2nd defendant are the absolute owners of the plant schedule properties of items 1 and 2 in an extent of 664.88 sq.yards or 56 sq.Meters of site in R.S.Nos.442, situated in the village of Matsyapuri village, Veeravasaram Mandal.

The late Digamarthi Venkateswarulu @ Bangarayya and the 2nd defendant have together brought the plaint schedule property for sale for medical expenses of late Digamarthi Venkateswarlu @ Bangarayya and also for their family expenses. Though, the plaintiff has entered into the agreement of sale to purchase the plaint schedule property for Rs.8,10,000/- and the said Late

Digamarthi Venakteswrulu @ Bangarayya and 2nd defendant have executed an agreement of sale dated 3-1-2018 with the terms and conditions in favour of 2 plaintiff and received Rs.7,80,000/- ( 5,40,000/- and Rs.2,40,000/- in installments).

While matter stood thus, the said Bangarayya died intestate on 23-5-2018 leaving behind the defendants 1 to 4 as his legal heirs. Thereafter the plaintiff has been demanding the defendants to execute Registered sale deed and he is ready and willing to perform his part of the contract, but they intentionally evade to execute the registered sale deed. The plaintiff got issued a Registered legal notice dated.29-10-2018 to the defendants to execute registered sale deed by receiving the balance sale consideration of Rs.30,000/-, but they did not respondent and did not give any reply.

Hence the suit.

3. The defendants did not appear before the court, they were set exparte on 7.12.2018.

4. In support of the case, the Plaintiff examined P.W.1 and got marked

Exs.A-1 and A-2. P.W.1 is Digamarthi Venkata Surya Kondala Rao.Ex.A-1 is agreement of sale executed by Digamarthi Venkateswarlu @ Bangarayya and the 2nd defendant in favour of the plaintiff dt. 3-1-2018 for Rs.8,10,000/-, Ex.A-2 is office copy of legal notice dt. 29-10-2018.

5. Heard the Counsel for the Plaintiff.

6. The Point for consideration is:

Whether the Plaintiff is entitled for the relief as claimed

for?

7. P O I N T:-

This is a suit for specific performance of agreement of sale under

Ex.A-1 in which the plaintiff has to establish that he is ready and willing to perform his part of contract. The plaintiff in support of his case examined P.W.1.

P.W.1 chief affidavit is reiterating the plaint averments, they are needless to produce.

Late Digamarthi Venkateswrulu @ Bangaryya and 2nd defendant are the absolute owners of item Nos.1 and 2 of the plant schedule properties. To meet the medical expenses of Late Digamarthi Venkateswrulu @ Bangaryya and for their family maintenance agreed to sell the plaint schedule property for

Rs.8,10,000/-, for which Late Digamarthi Venkateswrulu @ Bangaryya and 2nd 3 defendant agreed to sell the same to the plaintiff by virtue of sale deed dated 3-1-2018 and thereafter the Late Digamarthi Venkateswrulu @ Bangaryya and 2nd defendant executed Ex.A-1 agreement of sale on 3-1-2018 for Rs.8,10,000/-.

Thereafter the said Bangarayya died intestate on 23-5-2018 leaving behind the defendants 1 to 4 as his legal heirs. Thereafter, the plaintiff requested the defendants to execute registered settlement deed but they postponed the same with some pretext or other and that plaintiff got issued Ex.A-2 legal notice dated 3-1-2018 demanding to receive balance amount of consideration Rs.30,000/- and to execute registered sale deed, but there is no response from the defendants.

To show that the defendants are ready and willing to perform their part of contract, the plaintiff got issued original Ex.A-2 legal notice. To challenge the genuinity of Ex.A-1 agreement of sale, the defendants are not appeared before the court on 23-5-2018.

8. In the light of above circumstances, I am of the view that the evidence of the P.W.1 is trustworthy and believable because his evidence is also supported by documentary evidence of Exs.A.1 and A-2. Hence, plaintiff is entitled for the relief as claimed.

9. In the result, the suit is decreed with costs by granting the relief of

Specific performance by directing the defendants 1 to 4 to execute a registered sale deed in favour of plaintiff as per agreement of sale deed dated 3-1-2018 for the paint schedule property and deliver the possession to the plaintiff, failing which the plaintiff is at liberty to proceed according to law. The plaintiff is directed to pay the remaining balance of Rs.30,000/- to the defendants within three months.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court, this the 1 st day of May, 2019.

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

BHIMAVARAM.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF : FOR DEFENDANTS :

P.W.1: Digamarthi Venkata Surya Kondalarao - N O N E – 4

DOCUMENTS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF : Ex.A-1/Dt.3-1-2018 : Agreement of sale executed by Digamarthi

Venkateswarlu @ Bangarayya and the 2nd defendant in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.8,10,000/-,

Ex.A-2/Dt.29-10-2018 : Office copy of legal notice.

FOR DEFENDANTS : - N I L -

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

BHIMAVARAM.

OS/276/2018

Jaddu Narasimha Rao vs Digamarthi Bhavani

01 May 2019

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE :: BHIMAVARAM

PRESENT :- SRI V.SRINIVASA RAO,

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

Wednesday, the 1st day of May, 2019

O.S.No.276/2018

Between : Jaddu Narasimha Rao … Plaintiff.

and

1. Digamarthi Bhavani

2. Digamarthi Srinivas

3. Ayinaparthi Mutyavani

4. Ballari Durga... Defendants.

This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of

J U D G M E N T

This is a suit filed under Section 26, Order 7, Rule 1 of C.P.C., for

Specific performance of the suit agreement of sale deed dated 14-1-2018 by directing the defendants 1 to 4 to execute a register sale deed for the plaint schedule property of the defendants 1 to 4 in favour of plaintiff, failing which the plaintiff is at liberty to proceed according to law.

2. The brief averments of the plaint are as follows:

The 2nd defendant is the son and the defendants 3 and 4 are the daughters of 1st defendant and late Digamarthi Venkateswarulu @ Bangarayya.

Late Digamarthi Venkateswrulu @ Bangaryya and 2nd defendant are the absolute owners of the plant schedule properties of items 1 and 2 in an extent of Ac.1-45 cents in R.S.No.515/2B and R.S.515/2A situated in the village of Matsyapuri village, Veeravasaram Mandal.

The late Digamarthi Venkateswarulu @ Bangarayya and the 2nd defendant have together brought the plaint schedule property for sale, for medical expenses of late Digamarthi Venkateswarlu @ Bangarayya and also for their family expenses. Though, the plaintiff has entered into the agreement of sale to purchase the plaint schedule property for Rs.11,25,000/- and the said

Late Digamarthi Venakteswrulu @ Bangarayya and 2nd defendant have executed an agreement of sale dated 14-1-2018 with the terms and conditions in favour of 2 plaintiff and received Rs.11,00,000/- ( 7,00,000/- and Rs.4,00,000/- in installments).

While matter stood thus, the said Bangarayya died intestate on 23-5-2018 leaving behind the defendants 1 to 4 as his legal heirs. Thereafter the plaintiff has been demanding the defendants to execute Registered sale deed and he is ready and willing to perform his part of the contract, but they intentionally evade to execute the registered sale deed. The plaintiff got issued a Registered legal notice dated.29-10-2018 to the defendants to execute registered sale deed by receiving the balance sale consideration of Rs.25,000/-, but they did not respondent and did not give any reply.

Hence the suit.

3. The defendants did not appear before the court, they were set exparte on 7.11.2018.

4. In support of the case, the Plaintiff examined P.W.1 and got marked

Exs.A-1 and A-2. P.W.1 is Jaddu Narasihma Rao, Ex.A-1 is agreement of sale executed by Digamarthi Venkateswarlu @ Bangarayya and the 2nd defendant in favour of the plaintiff dt. 14-1-2018 for Rs.11,25,000/-, Ex.A-2 is office copy of legal notice dt. 29-10-2018.

5. Heard the Counsel for the Plaintiff.

6. The Point for consideration is:

Whether the Plaintiff is entitled for the relief as claimed

for?

7. P O I N T:-

This is a suit for specific performance of agreement of sale under

Ex.A-1 in which the plaintiff has to establish that he is ready and willing to perform his part of contract. The plaintiff in support of his case examined P.W.1.

P.W.1 chief affidavit is reiterating the plaint averments, they are needless to produce.

Rs.11,25,000/-, for which Late Digamarthi Venkateswrulu @ Bangaryya and 2nd 3 defendant agreed to sell the same to the plaintiff by virtue of agreement of sale

dated 14-1-2018 and thereafter the Late Digamarthi Venkateswrulu @

Bangaryya and 2nd defendant executed Ex.A-1 agreement of sale on 14-1-2018 for Rs.11,25,000/-. Thereafter the said Bangarayya died intestate on 23-5-2018 leaving behind the defendants 1 to 4 as his legal heirs. Thereafter, the plaintiff requested the defendants to execute registered settlement deed but they postponed the same with some pretext or other and that plaintiff got issued

Ex.A-2 legal notice dated 29-10-2018 demanding to receive balance amount of consideration Rs.25,000/- and executed registered sale deed, but there is no response from the defendants. To show that the defendants are ready and willing to perform their part of contract, the plaintiff got issued original Ex.A-2 legal notice. To challenge the genuinity of Ex.A-1 agreement of sale, the defendants are not appeared before the court on 7-11-2018.

9. In the result, the suit is decreed with costs by granting the relief of

Specific performance by directing the defendants 1 to 4 to execute a registered sale deed in favour of plaintiff as per agreement of sale dated 14-1-2018 for the paint schedule property and deliver the possession to the plaintiff, failing which the plaintiff is at liberty to proceed according to law. The plaintiff is directed to pay the remaining balance of Rs.25,000/- to the defendants within three months.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court, this the 1 st day of May, 2019.

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

BHIMAVARAM.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF : FOR DEFENDANTS :

P.W.1: Jaddu Narasimha Rao - N O N E – 4

DOCUMENTS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF : Ex.A-1/Dt.14-1-2018 : Agreement of sale executed by Digamarthi

Venkateswarlu @ Bangarayya and the 2nd defendant in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.11,25,000/-,

Ex.A-2/Dt.29-10-2018 : Office copy of legal notice.

FOR DEFENDANTS : - N I L -

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

BHIMAVARAM.

OS/15/2019

Chilaka Peddi Raju vs Valavala Varalakshmi

01 May 2019

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE :: BHIMAVARAM

PRESENT :- SRI V.SRINIVASA RAO,

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

Wednesday, the 1st day of May,2019

O.S.No.15/2019

Between :

Chilaka Peddi Raju… Plaintiff.

and

Valavala Varalakshmi … Defendant.

This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of

Sri V.Satyanarayana Murthy, Advocate for the Plaintiff; and the Defendant is called absent and remained exparte and having stood over the matter for consideration to this day, this Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

This is a suit filed under Section 26, Order 7, Rule 1 of C.P.C., for recovery of Rs.32,63,999-94/- being the principal and interest due on promissory note with subsequent interest and for costs.

2. The brief averments of the plaint are as follows:

On 9-5-2016 the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.20,00,000/- from the plaintiff for her family debts agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., either to the plaintiff or to her order on demand and executed a

Promissory note in favour of plaintiff. Inspite of repeated demands, the defendant did not choose to pay the pronote debt. Then the plaintiff got issued

Registered legal notice dated 25-2-2019, but the defendant is evading to receive the same.

Hence, the Suit.

3. The Defendants set exparte on 8-4-2019.

4. In support of the case, the Plaintiff examined P.W.1 and got marked

Exs.A-1 to A-3. P.W.1 Chilaka Peddi Raju is plaintiff. Ex.A-1 is promissory note

dated 9-5-2016 for Rs.20,00,000/- executed by defendant in favour of the

plaintiff, Ex.A-2 is the Office copy of Legal notice dt. 26-2-2019 with postal receipt, Ex.A-3 unserved returned postal cover with postal acknowledgement

5. Heard the Counsel for the Plaintiff.

6. The Point for consideration is:

Whether the Plaintiff is entitled for the relief as claimed

for?

7. P O I N T:- The Plaintiff examined P.W.1 and it reiterated the pleadings of the plaint, and got marked Exs.A-1 to A-3. The evidence of P.W.1 is not challenged by the Defendant as she is remained exparte, as such it can be inferred that the Defendant has accepted the suit claim of the Plaintiff.

8. In the light of above circumstances, I am of the view that the evidence of the P.W.1 is trustworthy and believable because her evidence is also supported the documentary evidence of Exs.A.1 to A-3. Hence, she is entitled for the relief as claimed.

9. In the result, the suit is decreed with costs against the defendant for suit amount of Rs.32,63,999-94/- and subsequent interest at 12% p.a., from the date of filing of the suit till the date of decree and thereafter at 6% p.a., from the date of decree till the date of realization on principal amount of Rs.20,00,000/-.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court, this the 1 st day of May, 2019.

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

BHIMAVARAM.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF : FOR DEFENDANT : P.W.1: Chilaka Peddi Raju - N O N E –

DOCUMENTS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF : Ex.A.1Dt.9.5.2016 Promissory note for Rs.20,00,000/- executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff.

Ex.A-2Dt. 26-2-2019 Office copy of Legal notice with postal receipt. Ex.A-3Dt. -- Unservedreturnedpostalcoverwithpostal acknowledgement

FOR DEFENDANT : - N I L -

S.C.J.,

BVRM.

OS/282/2016

Dintakurthi Veera Venkata Narasimha Rao vs Nerall Venkata Koteswara Rao

01 May 2019

Order Record 3,052 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
EP/17/2019	Kongati Prasad vs Vinjarapu Jaya Veera Venkata Satya Vara Prasad	03 May 2019	Order	—
OS/198/2018	Valavala Peddintlamma vs Pathi Dhana Lakshmi	02 May 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/14/2019	Nunnaboina Yaso Deepika vs Nunnaboina Jnana Deepak	02 May 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/27/2019	Samanthapudi Madhavi vs Samanthapudi Nagaraju	02 May 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/52/2019	Bommuluuri Satya Naga Sri Devi vs Bommuluuri Kiran	02 May 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/186/2018	Kontheti Venkata Subba Rao vs NIL	02 May 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/219/2018	Smt. Anasuri Devi Bhavani vs Sri Anasuri Muralikrishna	02 May 2019	Order	—
EP/23/2019	Amirapu Venkata Krishnaiah vs Amirapu Venkata Suryanarayana Murthy	01 May 2019	Order	—
OS/15/2019	Chilaka Peddi Raju vs Valavala Varalakshmi	01 May 2019	Judgment	—
OS/275/2018	Digamarthi Venkata Surya Kondala Rao vs Digamarthi Bhavani	01 May 2019	Judgment	—
OS/276/2018	Jaddu Narasimha Rao vs Digamarthi Bhavani	01 May 2019	Judgment	—
OS/282/2016	Dintakurthi Veera Venkata Narasimha Rao vs Nerall Venkata Koteswara Rao	01 May 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/177/2018	Gopthi Naga Babu vs Golthi Satyavathi Devi @ Sailu	01 May 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/215/2018	Anumakonda Anu Radha vs Anumakonda Radha Krishna	01 May 2019	Order	—
EP/11/2019	Korrakuti Surya Kumari vs Neelapu Jhansi	30 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/20/2019	Penmetsa Balaram Venkata Kishore Raju vs Datla Roja	30 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/24/2019	Pedasingu Roja vs Gopi Jaya Raju	30 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/29/2019	Bonthu Ramesh vs Juttiga Prasad	30 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/30/2019	Nelapati Yesu Dasu vs Juttiga Prasad	30 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/88/2017	Ch.Rama Venkata Veeraswamy Naidu vs Jetti Saibaba (Died)	30 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/113/2013	Gudigantla Suryanarayana vs Jetti Saibaba	30 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/149/2018	Bokka Santah Ram vs Bokka Jhanasi lakshmi	30 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/182/2018	Dantuluri Sri Satya Anjaneya Varma vs NIL	30 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/185/2018	Datlal Venkata Suryanarayana Raju vs NIL	30 Apr 2019	Order	—
S.O.P/44/2019	Annepu Pavan Kalyan vs The State Bank of India	30 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/6/2019	Kotipalli Jayalakshmi vs Gudise Pal Ushanadh	29 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/19/2018	Bandaru GAngayya Naidu vs Jami Suryachadra Rao	29 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/87/2018	Smt. Alluri Sridevi vs Chamarthi Kodanda Rama Kanaka Durga Vara Prasada Guptha	29 Apr 2019	Order	—
FDP/836/2013	Oggu Krishna Venu Subrahmanyam vs Oggu Srinivasu	29 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/157/2018	Sagiraju Venkata Ram Uday Chaitanya vs Smt. Sagiraju Sudha	25 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/38/2018	Bangaru Ratnavathi (Died) vs Nandyala Sunitha	24 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/74/2018	Mutyala Venkata Ratnam vs Madasu Seshagiri	24 Apr 2019	Order	—
OS/132/2015	Avidi Satyanarayana vs Akula Vanumalamaa	24 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/39/2019	Pedapattu Girija Naga Kumari vs Pedapattapu Satish	24 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/48/2018	GUDIMETLA SARIKA vs GUDIMETLA TRINADH REDDY	24 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/58/2019	Sagi Srinivas Siddardha vs NIL	24 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/1/2019	M/s Margadarsi Chit Fund Pvt., Ltd., Bhimavaram Branch vs Sirigineedi Kasi Viswanadham	23 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/49/2017	kapil chit fund vs Marlapudi Gershon	23 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/94/2017	Gram Panchayat Akividu vs Siriigiri Kanaka Bhushamma	23 Apr 2019	Order	—
OS/178/2015	Ganapathi Vara lakshmi vs Jetti Sai Baba	23 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/45/2019	Smt. Irrinki Lalitha Ratna Manikyam @ Kotipalli Lalitha Ratna Manikyam vs Irrinki Rangaiah Naidu	23 Apr 2019	Order	—
OS/234/2014	Jakkamsetti Bhagyavathi vs Jakkamsetti Venkateswararao	22 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/26/2019	Siribomma Venkata Lakshmi vs Siribomma Bogesh	22 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/33/2019	Karnati Ponduranga Rao vs Karanati Venkata Durga	22 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/113/2017	TIKKA MADHUSUDHANA RAO vs TIKKA SINDHUJA	22 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/158/2018	Veerabomma Jwala Venkata Shyam Sundar vs NIL	22 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/46/2019	Balasani Srinivas vs Balasani Devi Nagamani	20 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/47/2019	Mindala Prasad @ Prasad Babu vs Mindala Mariyya	20 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/46/2018	Devarapalli Venkata Ramana Murthy vs Karadi Rama Rao	18 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/65/2018	Yerramsetti Venkata Subbarao vs Sheik Khasim	18 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/35/2019	Teku Naga Sai Venkata Lakshmi vs Teku Venkatacharyulu	18 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/41/2019	Grandhi Jaya Ram vs Grandhi Umamaheswari	18 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/60/2018	Yanumla Lakshmi Narayana Prasad vs Yerra Venkata Subbarao	17 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/64/2018	Bodapati Ravi Teja vs Vusala Charles Pravaeen	17 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/80/2017	Donga Pateswara Rao vs Vssavaram Srinivasa Rao	17 Apr 2019	Order	—
OS/17/2017	Vagicharla Nageswari Devi vs Juturi Venkateswarlu	17 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
OS/209/2009	Goriparthi Srinivasa Rao vs Karumuri Bharathamatha	17 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/17/2019	Seshadri Subash vs Seshadri Surya Kumari	17 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/43/2019	Gurram Srinivasa Rao vs Gurram Rajya Lakshmi	17 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/135/2018	Bandaru Venkata Veerababu vs Bandaru Ratna Kumari	17 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/201/2018	Varre Subbarao vs Varre Ananya	17 Apr 2019	Order	—
OS/239/2009	Kanagarla Pushpavathi vs Kothapalli Nageswara Rao	16 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
OS/290/2018	M/s Nexus Feeds Limited, vs M/s Lakshmi Industries	16 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/43/2019	Gurram Srinivasa Rao vs Gurram Rajya Lakshmi	16 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/201/2018	Varre Subbarao vs Varre Ananya	16 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/12/2019	Bochula Venkateswara Rao vs Bonthu Venu Gopala Rao	15 Apr 2019	Order	—
OS/128/2015	Kavuru sarveswara Rao vs Vendra Ramanujamma	15 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
OS/440/2007	Rudra raju Ravi varma vs Gottumukkala Syama Prasad Raju	15 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/154/2018	Pulavarthi Sesha Sai Appala Surya Seetha Mahalakshm vs Pulavarthi Kusala Kantah Sharma	15 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/159/2009	Manthena Krishnam Raju vs Kalidindi Venkateswaramma died	10 Apr 2019	Order	—
OS/243/2018	Somu Lakhsmi Narayana vs Nimmithi Durga Rao	10 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/40/2019	Akula Venkata Ramana vs Akula Rambabu	09 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/50/2016	BOKKA GOVINDA RAO vs BANGARU SIVA SRINVASU	08 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/61/2018	Penmetsa Neelakanteswara Raju vs Penmetsa Satyanarayana Raju	08 Apr 2019	Order	—
IP/5/2013	Sakinetipalli Ravi Varma vs Paruchuri Udaya Kiran	04 Apr 2019	Order	—
OS/11/2019	Bethu Prasad vs Valavala Varalakshmi	04 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
OS/128/2007	Pasupuleti Murali Krishna vs The Muncipal Council of Bhimavaram	04 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
OS/176/2015	Javvadi Sriramachandra Murthy vs Sanku Nageswararao alias Nagu	04 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/3/2018	Balla Naga raju vs Bolla Durga Bhavani	04 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/4/2019	Gottumukkala Viswanadha Raju vs Kopparthi Someswara Rao	03 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/57/2018	Chunduri Anuradha vs Nimmala Veera Venikata Satyanarayana	03 Apr 2019	Order	—
IP/19/2017	kasireddy Venkateswara rao Alias Srinu vs A.Venkata subba Rao alis Venkayya	03 Apr 2019	Order	—
OS/304/2015	Papolu Veera Venkata Satayanarayana vs Valluri Rechal Naina alias Tadepalli Rechai Naina	03 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
IP/7/2013	Chandika Sri Ramulu vs Manthena Sarraju	02 Apr 2019	Order	—
IP/14/2017	Kurmala Nageswara Guptha vs Vschintapalli Druga Rao	02 Apr 2019	Order	—
OS/206/2018	Manukonda Padamavathi vs Bommidi Kanaka Durga Janiki Devi	02 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
OS/380/2014	State Bank of Hyderabad, vs Pechetti Mohana Krishna	02 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/187/2018	Gonaboina Subrahmanyam vs Gonaboina Rama Lakshmi	02 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/73/2016	K.SUBBA RAO vs J.SAIBABA	01 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/4/2015	Smt.Aduri Laxmi Madhuri vs Aduri Naga Ganga Raju	01 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/19/2019	Katari Satyasri vs Katari Peda Satyanarayana @ Satyanarayana	01 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/30/2019	Gudala Bhavani vs Gudala Durga Pavan Kumar	01 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/147/2018	Katabathuni Kranthi Kumar vs NIl	01 Apr 2019	Order	—
OS/288/2012	Paleti Annapurna vs Gottumukkala Pallavi	28 Mar 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/13/2019	Peddada Easwari @ Kaleswari vs Peddada Srinivasu @ Vasu @ Srinivasa Rao	28 Mar 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/29/2019	Ramanam Sairam vs Ramanam Nageswara Rao	28 Mar 2019	Order	—
EP/112/2014	Bhupathiraju Satyanarayanaraju vs Revenue Divisional Officer, Narsapur.	27 Mar 2019	Order	—
EP/123/2014	Datla Rama Krishnam Raju vs Land Acquisition Officer	27 Mar 2019	Order	—
EP/124/2014	Alluri Radha Manohari vs Land Acquisition Officer	27 Mar 2019	Order	—
EP/126/2014	Bhupatiraju Appalaraju vs Land Acquisition Officer	27 Mar 2019	Order	—

Showing 100 of 3,052 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

May 2019		17
Apr 2019		80
Mar 2019		81
Feb 2019		93
Jan 2019		48
Dec 2018		65
Nov 2018		85
Oct 2018		100
Sep 2018		98
Aug 2018		93
Jul 2018		64
Jun 2018		77

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Sri V.Srinivasa Rao, M.A., M.L., handled?

Sri V.Srinivasa Rao, M.A., M.L., has handled 3291 court orders since 2015 at III ADJ Court Complex, Bhimavaram. The average disposal rate is 79 orders per month.

What types of cases does Sri V.Srinivasa Rao, M.A., M.L., hear?

Based on available records, Sri V.Srinivasa Rao, M.A., M.L., primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Sessions Cases) at III ADJ Court Complex, Bhimavaram.

Where is Sri V.Srinivasa Rao, M.A., M.L., currently posted?

Sri V.Srinivasa Rao, M.A., M.L., is posted as Senior Civil Judge, Bhimavaram. at III ADJ Court Complex, Bhimavaram, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Sri V.Srinivasa Rao, M.A., M.L., available online?

Yes. 8 judgments by Sri V.Srinivasa Rao, M.A., M.L., are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Sri V.Srinivasa Rao, M.A., M.L., dispose cases?

Sri V.Srinivasa Rao, M.A., M.L., disposes approximately 79 cases per month, based on 3291 orders handled over their tenure at III ADJ Court Complex, Bhimavaram.

Since when is Sri V.Srinivasa Rao, M.A., M.L., serving?

Sri V.Srinivasa Rao, M.A., M.L., has been serving at III ADJ Court Complex, Bhimavaram since 2015.

Case Types

OS 46%

EP 23%

H 20%

IP 6%

SC 4%

L 1%

S 1%

EAS 0%

Posting History

Nov 2015 — May 2019

Senior Civil Judge, Bhimavaram. · 3,291 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Dr B.Lakshmi Narayana

III ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

884 orders

Muthavarapu Sudharani

Senior Civil Judge, Bhimavaram.

90 orders

Smt.C.Ramya

Principal Junior Civil Judge -cum- Judicial Magist...

0 orders

← View all judges at III ADJ Court Complex, Bhimavaram

Sri V.Srinivasa Rao, M.A., M.L.,

J U D G M E N T

Whether the Plaintiff is entitled for the relief as claimed

BHIMAVARAM.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

DOCUMENTS MARKED

BHIMAVARAM.

J U D G M E N T

Whether the Plaintiff is entitled for the relief as claimed

BHIMAVARAM.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

DOCUMENTS MARKED

BHIMAVARAM.

J U D G M E N T

Whether the Plaintiff is entitled for the relief as claimed

BHIMAVARAM.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

DOCUMENTS MARKED

BHIMAVARAM.

J U D G M E N T

Whether the Plaintiff is entitled for the relief as claimed

BHIMAVARAM.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

DOCUMENTS MARKED

JUDGMENT

BHIMAVARAM.