Vacant, FAC Smt C.Satyavani B.A.Hons,B.L.

'

IN THE COURT Of THE sr-OR CIVIL JUDGE: GOOTY

l; NI ,.. .... ,,. ,,._. 1 present: Smt C~~f~~v~~,,-,~;A:1,(Honl•), e.L., Addi, ~enlor Clvll Judge, A""n{ap.uram, ~~C: ·'Senior CIVIi Judge, Gooty, /~~We""d~~.;daY;)~~?61., deY ~, February, 2014 ~~:·{ ( /., t. • O~S,No~o1 4 ,.;. •. '· \ ,. ~ i;~ . ~ ' :· \ '. . . ~, I '·. 1.:11 \.:,. ' •(

'

·~· :~;,__ . • \ I ,, • •• .. • . \ ;' l..' . '/ , Between ··c.. .•.• .,. 't > ~ '\ ,. .... ·•, ·\ :.' . ,\ '• " • "C ,.._... ♦ •· • Smt Sared\~~tiit~a ~,~ .... -;~·~>~\ , , ~ ·,, ' •._.,{ -~ .... Plaintiff. f; ~ - ! f 0 \. at • • 4\ f" •·· ~j~-~,,.~, :-, ....

,. ~-:•· >·.

~l1d~--

...

Smt Eguduru Sowbagyavathi Defendant. •••

Suit for recover of Rs.5,65,000/- being the principal and interest due on promissory note dated 30-11-2012 e·,cecuted by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.5,00,0001_- agreeing to repay the same with interest at 12% per annum and claimed at the same rate as the defendant is an agriculturist and for costs of the suit.

This suit coming on this day for disposal before me in the presence of , Sri M.Sreedhar, advocate for the plaintiff and defendant having remained ex parte; this court delivered the following: - l U D <i MEN T f affidavit of the plaintiff is flied ands the same is treated as Chief Ex.A.1 is marked. Perused the evidence of P.W.1 and the suit is decreed with costs against the defendant for terest at 12% p.a., from the date of suit till the date of r at 6% p.a., on principal sum of Rs.5,00,000/- till the the open court, this the 26th day of February, 2014.

ADi>1'.,s~~Tu><\E,

ANANTAPU RAM.

FAC: SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GOOTY.

it?

Contlnued ... 2

1

-2· . ..

'

AQQendlx_of mdence , ' t ,/ Wltnesses_exarn.1n.ed for Plaintiff: Defendam P.W.1/26-02-2014: Sareddy Anltha (Plaintiff) -None . ... • , •• . , ) r- Exhibits marked for Ex.A.1: Suit promissory note dated 30-11-2012 for Rs.5,00,000/--Nil-

ff? Sr.C.J.

a 7

>'

~E COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE: GOOTV : . ~'91'1, B.A., (Honi,), B.L., Addi. Senior Clvll Judge,

Mfltlb1ilti'hi !t:~: Senior c1vll Judge, Gooty.

, ~-£~f,~f fi~~,.

... .. . . •. ' I ( '')'

h daV of February, 2014 . ~ ,,., t>I,',' ~ I ;." -~--- .,~ • • ~'<': :•:·o~s\ I '-.,. • • \ \

1201, •

• y· ... ')' \,·

ttt -; . . ,t•~.•;·:_ ,r . •

~~~o~ti~m' ReJ,i. • ... . .. Plaintiff.

• • /ri • • C) ,. ~ . _,,___ f. -";~~- , ,

...

eddy . . . Defendant .

~'"' for recover of Rs.2,31,500/- being the principle and Interest due

on~~ dated 20-01-2011 executed by the defendant In favour of

lhe plalnliff f&,Rs.1,50,000/- agreeing to repay the same with Interest at 24CM. per annum and claimed at the same rate as the defendant Is not an r agrtmltur:lst and for costs of the suit. 1 I , • I 1hls suit coming on ~his day for ~lsposal before me In the presence of r • • l Srt R.V.Cl'lalapathl and Sri V.Munaiah, advocates for the plaintiff and Sri , I G.Sreekanth Reddy, advocate for defendant and counsel for the plaintiff having field a memo stating that dismiss the suit without costs, as the . , matter Is settled out of the court ; this court delivered the following:-

1

JUDGMENT

Memo field by the counsel In office on 22-01-2014 In C.F.No. 72. Seen.

,

Sult dismissed as settled out of court. No costs. . ~ ,

Pronounced by me In the open court, ~his the 12th day of February, 2014 .

.

ADDc1, .. SE-N~l~O_,R

-------- ' ANANTAPURAM.

ff! FAC: Sl!NIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GOOTV.

'

&1pend1x .of,tXldenca

J .. Nll·j

t

a

ii

'

•

... oefendant.

K.Jesamma ...

r1nciple a~d interest due Suit for recover of Rs.1,11,800/- being the P • t In favour of on promissory note dated 05-06-2010 executed bY the defendan · st at 240/o e with intere the plaintiff for Rs.65,000/- agreeing to repay the sam i not an per annum and . claimed at the same rate as defendant 5 th e agriculturist and for costs of the suit.

This suit coming on this day for disposal before me In the presence of Sri A. Anjinappa and Sri N.Chandra s~khar, advocates for the plaintiff and defendant having remained exparte; this court delivered the following:-

JUDGMENT

~hief affidavit of the plaintiff is field and the same Is treated as Chief examination of P.W.1. Ex.A.1 to A.4 are marked. Perused the evidence of P.W.1 and documents. Heard.

In the result, the suit Is decreed with costs against the defendant for Rs.1,11,800/- with interest at 12% p.a., from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter at 6% p.a., on Principal sum of Rs.65,000/- till the date of realization.

Pronounced by me In the open court, this the 05th . day of February, 2014.

DDt:. Nl(~~n UDGE,

ANANTAPURAM.

p;

FAC: SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GOOTY.

Contlnued ... 2

-2·

'. ru,peod'X of evlden~e ,, ,I I

witnesses examined for

Plaintiff: Defendant: P.W.1/05-02-2014: N.Murall (Plaintiff) ·None-

exhibits marked for

Ex.A.1: Sult promissory note dated 05-06-2010 -Nil- for Rs.65,000/- i Ex.A.2: Office copy of legal notice dtOB-03-2013

' '

I, . Ex.A.3: Postal Receipt . · Ex.A.4: Postal Acknowledgment 1/

\ I

J 1.

1

I

...

Plaintiff .

Defendant. Ragipindi Harinath Reddy

Suit for recovery of Rs.2,31,SOO/· being the principle and interest due on a promissory note dated 20-01-2011 executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.l,50,000/- agreeing to repay the same with iilterest at 24% per annum, but claimed at the same rate as the defendant is not an agriculturist and for costs of the suit.

This suit coming on this day for disposal before me in the presence of Sri V.Muneiah, and Sri R.V.Chalapathi, advocates for the plaintiff and Sri \ G.Sreekanth Reddy, advocate for the defendant and advocate for the plaintiff having filed a memo stating that suit is dismissed as settled out of court; this court delivered the following: -

JUDGMENT

Perused the memo. The suit is dismissed as settled out of court.

Pronounced by me in the open court, this the 05th day of March, 2014.

~-~ AD

ANANTAPURAM.

FAC: SEN~VIL JUDGE, GOOTY,

Appendix.of evidence -Nil-