Smt. Y. Sri Lakshmi

Special Magistrate, Amalapuram

II Addl District Court Amalapuram · East Godavari · Andhra Pradesh

Smt. Y. Sri Lakshmi, Special Magistrate, Amalapuram, is posted at II Addl District Court Amalapuram, East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh, India. 3,491 court orders on record since 2020. 17 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CC, OS, EP cases.

3,491

Total Orders

Judgments

125

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

CC/728/2020 Acquitted

Proh.Excise Sub Inspector, Amalapuram vs Yadla Ganga Raju

27 Jan 2021

IN THE COURT OF ADDL. JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE,

AMALAPURAM

PRESENT: Smt. Srilakshmi Yarlagadda, Prl.Junior Civil Judge, (FAC) Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate, Amalapuram.

Wednesday, the 27th day of January, 2021

CALENDAR CASE No. 728/2020

Between:

State: Sub Inspector of Police, Prohibition and Excise Police Station, Amalapuram … Complainant.

and

Yadla Ganga Raju S/o Gopala Rao, Age: 49 years, C/Kapu, R/o Inavilli village, Inavilli Mandal. … Accused

This case is coming on 25.01.2021 for final hearing before me in the presence of A.P.P. for the State and of Sri B.Venkata Rao, Advocate for the

Accused and upon hearing the Arguments on both sides having stood over for consideration till this day, the court made the following :

J U D G M E N T

1.The gravamen of the charge against the accused is that he was found in possession and sale of 9-180ml ACP Prestige Deluxe whisky bottles and thereby committed the offence punishable U/s. 34(a) of A.P. Excise Act.

2.The case of the prosecution in brief is that:-

On 29.10.2019 at about 10.00 A.M the accused was caught in Ainavilli Village when he was found in possession and sale of 9-180ml ACP Prestige Deluxe whisky bottles and thereby committed the offence punishable U/s. 34(a) A.P Excise Act and is liable to be convicted for the said offence.

3.This court took the cognizance under section 34 (a) of A. P. Excise Act. On appearance of the accused copies of documents were furnished to him as contemplated under section 207 Cr.P.C.

4. Accused is examined under section 239 Cr.P.C., he denied the offence. Hence the charge under section 34(a) of A. P. Excise Act is framed, read over and explained to him in Telugu, for which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Hence the accused has been tried for the said charge.

5. To substantiate its case, the prosecution examined PWs.1 and 2. Exs.P.1 to P.4 and MO.1 are got marked.

6.After closure of the prosecution evidence, the accused was examined under section 313 Cr.P.C, explaining the incriminating circumstances, appeared in the evidence of prosecution witnesses, for which, he denied them as false and reported no defence evidence.

7. Now the point for consideration is :-

Whether the prosecution establishes its case by proving seizure of the contra band under cover of Ex.P1 special report to bring home the guilt of the accused for the charge under sec 34 (a) of A.P. Excise Act beyond all reasonable doubt?

POINT:

8. The case of the prosecution is that the accused was found in possession of 9- 180ml ACP Prestige Deluxe whisky bottles; that the contra band was seized under cover of Ex.P4 special report.

9. It has been admitted by P.W.1 in his cross examination that the scene of offence is situated in a busy and residential locality. In such a case, it is improbable to believe that no one came forward to act as mediator for the search and seizure of the contra band and is devoid of appreciation, as the alleged scene of offence is situated in a busy and residential locality and any number of persons can be secured to act as mediators for the search and seizure of the contra band. Thus, it manifests from the testimony of P.W.1 that the mandatory requirements U/s.100 (4) Cr.P.C has not been complied with, in securing two or more respectable and independent persons of the locality to act as mediators for the search and seizure of the contra band. In these circumstances, it is highly unsafe to rely on the testimonies of PWs.1 and 2 in the absence of corroboration from an independent source.

10.For the afore said reasons, I am inclined to hold that the prosecution has miserably failed in proving the guilt of the accused for the charge U/s.34 (a) of A.P. Excise Act beyond all reasonable doubt and that the suggested plea of the accused that the case has been foisted against him for statistical purpose cannot be ruled out.

11.In the result, the accused is found not guilty for the charge U/s.34 (a) of A.P. Excise Act and is acquitted U/s.248 (1) Cr.P.C. MO.1 shall be destroyed after appeal time is over. The bail bonds if any of the accused shall be in force for Six months.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 27th day of January, 2021.

Prl.Jr.Civil Judge, (FAC) A.J.F.C.Magistrate, Amalapuram

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined

For Prosecution:

PW.1 : R.V.L.N.Rao PW.2 : L.Vijaya Lakhsmi

For Defence: Nil

Documents Marked

For prosecution : Ex.P.1: Special Report Ex.P.2: Original FIR Ex.P.3: Letter of Advice Ex.P.4: Chemical Analysis Report

For Defence: Nil

MOs. Marked

M.O.1 : 180ml ACP Prestige Deluxe whisky sample bottle

Prl.Jr.Civil Judge, (FAC) A.J.F.C.Magistrate, Amalapuram

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

In the Court of the Addl.Judicial First Class of Magistrate :: Amalapuram

C.C. 728/ 2020

Date of Offence: 29.10.2019

Date of Report : 29.10.2019

Date of arrest of Accused : 29.10.2019

Date of Release of accused on bail: --

Date of commencement of Trial : 22.01.2020

Date of close of Trial: 25.01.2021

Date of sentence or order: 27.01.2021

Crime No. and Name of the P.S: Cr.No.209/2019 of Amalapuram Excise P.S

Name of the Complainant: State : Sub-Inspector of Amalapuram Excise Police Station.

Name of the accused: Yadla Ganga Raju S/o Gopala Rao, Age: 49 years, C/Kapu, R/o Inavilli village,Inavilli Mandal Offence: U/Sec. 34(a) of A.P. Excise Act.1968

Finding : Found not guilty

Sentence: In the result, the accused is found not guilty for the charge U/s.34 (a) of A.P. Excise Act and is acquitted U/s.248 (1) Cr.P.C. MO.1 shall be destroyed after appeal time is over. The bail bonds if any of the accused shall be in force for Six months.

Prl.Jr.Civil Judge, (FAC) A.J.F.C.Magistrate, Amalapuram

Copy submitted to : The Hon’ble Chief Judl. Magistrate-Cum-Prl.Sr.Civil Judge, Rajamahendravaram.

CC/730/2020 Acquitted

Proh.Excise Sub Inspector, Amalapuram vs Kandregula Bhulakshmi

27 Jan 2021

IN THE COURT OF ADDL. JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE,

AMALAPURAM

PRESENT: Smt. Srilakshmi Yarlagadda, Prl.Junior Civil Judge, (FAC) Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate, Amalapuram.

Wednesday, the 27th day of January, 2021

CALENDAR CASE No. 730/2020

Between:

State: Sub Inspector of Police, Prohibition and Excise Police Station, Amalapuram … Complainant.

and

Kandregula Bhulakshmi, W/o Krishnamurty, Age: 61 years, C/Settibalija, R/o Vekalagaruvu village, Ambajipeta Mandal. … Accused

This case is coming on 25.01.2021 for final hearing before me in the presence of A.P.P. for the State and of Sri N.Venkanna, Advocate for the Accused and upon hearing the Arguments on both sides having stood over for consideration till this day, the court made the following :

J U D G M E N T

1.The gravamen of the charge against the accused is that he was found in possession and sale of 10-180ml Crazy Doll Fine Grain whisky bottles and thereby committed the offence punishable U/s. 34(a) of A.P. Excise Act.

2.The case of the prosecution in brief is that:-

On 10.08.2019 at about 02.00 P.M the accused was caught in Vakalagaruvu Village when he was found in possession and sale of 10-180ml Crazy Doll Fine Grain whisky bottles and thereby committed the offence punishable U/s. 34(a) A.P Excise Act and is liable to be convicted for the said offence.

3.This court took the cognizance under section 34 (a) of A. P. Excise Act. On appearance of the accused copies of documents were furnished to him as contemplated under section 207 Cr.P.C.

5. To substantiate its case, the prosecution examined PWs.1 and 2. Exs.P.1 to P.4 and MO.1 are got marked.

7. Now the point for consideration is :-

POINT:

8. The case of the prosecution is that the accused was found in possession of 10- 180ml Crazy Doll Fine Grain whisky bottles; that the contra band was seized under cover of Ex.P4 special report.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 27th day of January, 2021.

Prl.Jr.Civil Judge, (FAC) A.J.F.C.Magistrate, Amalapuram

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined

For Prosecution:

PW.1 : R.V.L.N.Rao PW.2 : L.Vijaya Lakhsmi

For Defence: Nil

Documents Marked

For prosecution : Ex.P.1: Special Report Ex.P.2: Original FIR Ex.P.3: Letter of Advice Ex.P.4: Chemical Analysis Report

For Defence: Nil

MOs. Marked

M.O.1 : 180ml Crazy Doll Fine Grain whisky sample bottle

Prl.Jr.Civil Judge, (FAC) A.J.F.C.Magistrate, Amalapuram

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

In the Court of the Addl.Judicial First Class of Magistrate :: Amalapuram

C.C. 730/ 2020

Date of Offence: 10.08.2019

Date of Report : 10.08.2019

Date of arrest of Accused : 10.08.2019

Date of Release of accused on bail: --

Date of commencement of Trial : 22.01.2020

Date of close of Trial: 25.01.2021

Date of sentence or order: 27.01.2021

Crime No. and Name of the P.S: Cr.No.182/2019 of Amalapuram Excise P.S

Name of the Complainant: State : Sub-Inspector of Amalapuram Excise Police Station.

Name of the accused: Kandregula Bhulakshmi, W/o Krishnamurty,Age: 61 years, C/Settibalija, R/o Vekalagaruvu village, Ambajipeta Mandal. Offence: U/Sec. 34(a) of A.P. Excise Act.1968

Finding : Found not guilty

Prl.Jr.Civil Judge, (FAC) A.J.F.C.Magistrate, Amalapuram

Copy submitted to : The Hon’ble Chief Judl. Magistrate-Cum-Prl.Sr.Civil Judge, Rajamahendravaram.

CC/722/2020 Acquitted

Proh.Excise Sub Inspector, Amalapuram vs Dunaboina Suresh

27 Jan 2021

IN THE COURT OF ADDL. JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE,

AMALAPURAM

PRESENT: Smt. Srilakshmi Yarlagadda, Prl.Junior Civil Judge, (FAC) Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate, Amalapuram.

Wednesday, the 27th day of January, 2021

CALENDAR CASE No. 722/2020

Between:

State: Sub Inspector of Police, Prohibition and Excise Police Station, Amalapuram … Complainant.

and

Dunaboina Suresh, S/o Venkateswara Rao, Age: 20 years, C/Settibalija, R/o Totharamudi vilage, Ainavilli Mandal. … Accused

This case is coming on 25.01.2021 for final hearing before me in the presence of A.P.P. for the State and of Sri N.Srinivas, Advocate for the Accused and upon hearing the Arguments on both sides having stood over for consideration till this day, the court made the following :

J U D G M E N T

1.The gravamen of the charge against the accused is that he was found in possession and sale of 7-180ml Original Choice Reserve whisky bottles and thereby committed the offence punishable U/s. 34(a) of A.P. Excise Act.

2.The case of the prosecution in brief is that:-

On 17.10.2019 at about 5.00 P.M the accused was caught in Totharamudi Village when he was found in possession and sale of 7-180ml Original Choice Reserve whisky bottles and thereby committed the offence punishable U/s. 34(a) A.P Excise Act and is liable to be convicted for the said offence.

3.This court took the cognizance under section 34 (a) of A. P. Excise Act. On appearance of the accused copies of documents were furnished to him as contemplated under section 207 Cr.P.C.

5. To substantiate its case, the prosecution examined PWs.1 and 2. Exs.P.1 to P.4 and MO.1 are got marked.

7. Now the point for consideration is :-

POINT:

8. The case of the prosecution is that the accused was found in possession of 7- 180ml Original Choice Reserve whisky bottles; that the contra band was seized under cover of Ex.P4 special report.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 27th day of January, 2021.

Prl.Jr.Civil Judge, (FAC) A.J.F.C.Magistrate, Amalapuram

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined

For Prosecution:

PW.1 : R.V.L.N.Rao PW.2 : L.Vijaya Lakhsmi

For Defence: Nil

Documents Marked

For prosecution : Ex.P.1: Special Report Ex.P.2: Original FIR Ex.P.3: Letter of Advice Ex.P.4: Chemical Analysis Report

For Defence: Nil

MOs. Marked

M.O.1 : 180ml Original Choice Reserve whisky sample bottle

Prl.Jr.Civil Judge, (FAC) A.J.F.C.Magistrate, Amalapuram

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

In the Court of the Addl.Judicial First Class of Magistrate :: Amalapuram

C.C. 722/ 2020

Date of Offence: 17.10.2019

Date of Report : 17.10.2019

Date of arrest of Accused : 17.10.2019

Date of Release of accused on bail: --

Date of commencement of Trial : 22.01.2020

Date of close of Trial: 25.01.2021

Date of sentence or order: 27.01.2021

Crime No. and Name of the P.S: Cr.No.205/2019 of Amalapuram Excise P.S

Name of the Complainant: State : Sub-Inspector of Amalapuram Excise Police Station.

Name of the accused: Dunaboina Suresh, S/o Venkateswara Rao, Age: 20 years, C/Settibalija, R/o Totharamudi vilage, Ainavilli Mandal Offence: U/Sec. 34(a) of A.P. Excise Act.1968

Finding : Found not guilty

Prl.Jr.Civil Judge, (FAC) A.J.F.C.Magistrate, Amalapuram

Copy submitted to : The Hon’ble Chief Judl. Magistrate-Cum-Prl.Sr.Civil Judge, Rajamahendravaram.

CC/720/2020 Acquitted

Proh.Excise Sub Inspector, Amalapuram vs Chekka Ganikamma

27 Jan 2021

IN THE COURT OF ADDL. JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE,

AMALAPURAM

PRESENT: Smt. Srilakshmi Yarlagadda, Prl.Junior Civil Judge, (FAC) Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate, Amalapuram.

Wednesday, the 27th day of January, 2021

CALENDAR CASE No. 720/2020

Between:

State: Sub Inspector of Police, Prohibition and Excise Police Station, Amalapuram … Complainant.

and

Chekka Ganikamma, W/o Venkateswarulu, Age: 45 years, C/Agnikulakshatriya, R/o Nakka Rameswaram village, Allavaram mandal. … Accused

J U D G M E N T

1.The gravamen of the charge against the accused is that he was found in possession and sale of 9-180ml Original Choice Reserve whisky bottles and thereby committed the offence punishable U/s. 34(a) of A.P. Excise Act.

2.The case of the prosecution in brief is that:-

On 21.10.2019 at about 07.00 A.M the accused was caught in Nakka

Rameswaram Village when he was found in possession and sale of 9-180ml

Original Choice Reserve whisky bottles and thereby committed the offence punishable U/s. 34(a) A.P Excise Act and is liable to be convicted for the said offence.

3.This court took the cognizance under section 34 (a) of A. P. Excise Act. On appearance of the accused copies of documents were furnished to him as contemplated under section 207 Cr.P.C.

4. Accused is examined under section 239 Cr.P.C., he denied the offence.

Hence the charge under section 34(a) of A. P. Excise Act is framed, read over and explained to him in Telugu, for which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Hence the accused has been tried for the said charge.

5. To substantiate its case, the prosecution examined PW.1. Exs.P.1 to P.4 and

MO.1 are got marked.

7. Now the point for consideration is :-

POINT:

8. The case of the prosecution is that the accused was found in possession of 9-180ml Original Choice Reserve whisky bottles; that the contra band was seized under cover of Ex.P1 special report.

9. It has been admitted by P.W.1 in her cross examination that the scene of offence is situated in a busy and residential locality. In such a case, it is improbable to believe that no one came forward to act as mediator for the search and seizure of the contra band and is devoid of appreciation, as the alleged scene of offence is situated in a busy and residential locality and any number of persons can be secured to act as mediators for the search and seizure of the contra band.

Thus, it manifests from the testimony of P.W.1 that the mandatory requirements

U/s.100 (4) Cr.P.C has not been complied with, in securing two or more respectable and independent persons of the locality to act as mediators for the search and seizure of the contra band. In these circumstances, it is highly unsafe to rely on the testimony of PW.1 in the absence of corroboration from an independent source.

10.For the afore said reasons, I am inclined to hold that the prosecution has miserably failed in proving the guilt of the accused for the charge U/s.34 (a) of A.P.

Excise Act beyond all reasonable doubt and that the suggested plea of the accused that the case has been foisted against him for statistical purpose cannot be ruled out.

11.In the result, the accused is found not guilty for the charge U/s.34 (a) of A.P.

Excise Act and is acquitted U/s.248 (1) Cr.P.C. MO.1 shall be destroyed after appeal time is over. The bail bonds if any of the accused shall be in force for Six months.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 25th day of January, 2021.

Prl.Jr.Civil Judge, (FAC) A.J.F.C.Magistrate, Amalapuram

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined

For Prosecution:

PW.1 : L.Vijaya Lakshmi

For Defence: Nil

Documents Marked

For prosecution :

Ex.P.1: Special Report . Ex.P.2: Origina FIR Ex.P.3: Letter of Advice Ex.P.4: Chemical Analysis Report

For Defence: Nil

MOs. Marked

M.O.1 : 180ml Original Choice Reserve whisky sample bottle

Prl.Jr.Civil Judge, (FAC) A.J.F.C.Magistrate, Amalapuram

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

In the Court of the Addl.Judicial First Class of Magistrate :: Amalapuram

C.C. 720 / 2020

Date of Offence: 21.10.2019

Date of Report : 21.10.2019

Date of arrest of Accused : 21.10.2019

Date of Release of accused on bail: --

Date of commencement of Trial : 22.01.2021

Date of close of Trial: 25.01.2021

Date of sentence or order: 27.01.2021

Crime No. and Name of the P.S: Cr.No.207/2019 of Amalapuram Excise P.S

Name of the Complainant: State : Sub-Inspector of Amalapuram Excise Police Station.

Name of the accused: Chekka Ganikamma, W/o Venkateswarulu, Age: 45 years, C/Agnikulakshatriya, R/o Nakka Rameswaram village, Allavaram mandal Offence: U/Sec. 34(a) of A.P. Excise Act.1968

Finding : Found not guilty

Prl.Jr.Civil Judge, (FAC) A.J.F.C.Magistrate, Amalapuram

Copy submitted to : The Hon’ble Chief Judl. Magistrate-Cum-Prl.Sr.Civil Judge,

Rajamahendravaram.

CC/721/2020 Acquitted

Proh.Excise Sub Inspector, Amalapuram vs Petta Bhagvan Das

27 Jan 2021

IN THE COURT OF ADDL. JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE,

AMALAPURAM

PRESENT: Smt. Srilakshmi Yarlagadda, Prl.Junior Civil Judge, (FAC) Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate, Amalapuram.

Wednesday, the 27th day of January, 2021

CALENDAR CASE No. 721/2020

Between:

State: Sub Inspector of Police, Prohibition and Excise Police Station, Amalapuram … Complainant.

and

Petta Bhagavan Das, S/o Venkanna, Age:58 years, Agnikulaskshatriya, R/o Nakka Rameswaram village, Allavaram mandal. … Accused

J U D G M E N T

1.The gravamen of the charge against the accused is that he was found in possession and sale of 10-180ml Original Choice Reserve whisky bottles and thereby committed the offence punishable U/s. 34(a) of A.P. Excise Act.

2.The case of the prosecution in brief is that:-

On 21.10.2019 at about 05.30 A.M the accused was caught in Nakka

Rameswaram Village when he was found in possession and sale of 10-180ml

Original Choice Reserve whisky bottles and thereby committed the offence punishable U/s. 34(a) A.P Excise Act and is liable to be convicted for the said offence.

3.This court took the cognizance under section 34 (a) of A. P. Excise Act. On appearance of the accused copies of documents were furnished to him as contemplated under section 207 Cr.P.C.

4. Accused is examined under section 239 Cr.P.C., he denied the offence.

5. To substantiate its case, the prosecution examined PW.1. Exs.P.1 to P.4 and

MO.1 are got marked.

7. Now the point for consideration is :-

POINT:

8. The case of the prosecution is that the accused was found in possession of 10-180ml Original Choice Reserve whisky bottles; that the contra band was seized under cover of Ex.P1 special report.

Thus, it manifests from the testimony of P.W.1 that the mandatory requirements

10.For the afore said reasons, I am inclined to hold that the prosecution has miserably failed in proving the guilt of the accused for the charge U/s.34 (a) of A.P.

Excise Act beyond all reasonable doubt and that the suggested plea of the accused that the case has been foisted against him for statistical purpose cannot be ruled out.

11.In the result, the accused is found not guilty for the charge U/s.34 (a) of A.P.

Excise Act and is acquitted U/s.248 (1) Cr.P.C. MO.1 shall be destroyed after appeal time is over. The bail bonds if any of the accused shall be in force for Six months.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 25th day of January, 2021.

Prl.Jr.Civil Judge, (FAC) A.J.F.C.Magistrate, Amalapuram

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined

For Prosecution:

PW.1 : L.Vijaya Lakshmi

For Defence: Nil

Documents Marked

For prosecution :

Ex.P.1: Special Report . Ex.P.2: Origina FIR Ex.P.3: Letter of Advice Ex.P.4: Chemical Analysis Report

For Defence: Nil

MOs. Marked

M.O.1 : 180ml Original Choice Reserve whisky sample bottle

Prl.Jr.Civil Judge, (FAC) A.J.F.C.Magistrate, Amalapuram

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

In the Court of the Addl.Judicial First Class of Magistrate :: Amalapuram

C.C. 721/ 2020

Date of Offence: 21.10.2019

Date of Report : 21.10.2019

Date of arrest of Accused : 21.10.2019

Date of Release of accused on bail: --

Date of commencement of Trial : 22.01.2021

Date of close of Trial: 25.01.2021

Date of sentence or order: 27.01.2021

Crime No. and Name of the P.S: Cr.No.206/2019 of Amalapuram Excise P.S

Name of the Complainant: State : Sub-Inspector of Amalapuram Excise Police Station.

Name of the accused: Petta Bhagavan Das, S/o Venkanna, Age:58 years, Agnikulaskshatriya, R/o Nakka Rameswaram village, Allavaram mandal Offence: U/Sec. 34(a) of A.P. Excise Act.1968

Finding : Found not guilty

Prl.Jr.Civil Judge, (FAC) A.J.F.C.Magistrate, Amalapuram

Copy submitted to : The Hon’ble Chief Judl. Magistrate-Cum-Prl.Sr.Civil Judge,

Rajamahendravaram.

Order Record 3,412 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
CC/165/2018	SHO, Amp Tq PS, mattaparthi Krishna Veni vs Mattaparthi Yedukondalu	23 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/3618/2022	The S.H.O.,Ainavilli P.S. vs Sunkara Purna Phanidar	23 Nov 2022	Order	—
OS/295/2022	Gunturi Veera Venkata Suryanarayana vs Pothula Satyanarayana	22 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
OS/95/2022	Nukala Lakslhmanaswamy vs Karri Maheswara Rao	19 Nov 2022	Other	—
OS/139/2022	Nichenakola Ramavathi vs Paramata Sattibabu	18 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/2263/2022	Sub-Inspector of Police, Ainavilli P.S. vs Kolupati Kanaka Raju	17 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
EP/45/2019	Buragayala Venkata Narayana Rao vs Kasi Venkata Rao	16 Nov 2022	Order	—
OS/7/2022	Nadimpalli Suryanarayana Raju vs Polisetty Brahmaji	16 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
OS/231/2022	Mamillapalli Subbaraju vs Pingala Bala Gopala Yogi	15 Nov 2022	Other	—
EP/53/2021	Kankatala Satyarao vs Kamisetty Suvarna Chakravarthy alias Yesu	14 Nov 2022	Order	—
OS/67/2021	Gokarakonda Ananda Basavayya Narasimhamurthy vs Somamandra Prabhakar	14 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
OS/19/2021	Pachipulusu Kasi Viswanatham vs Boddu Venkata Suresh	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
OS/23/2022	Koduri Sriramachandra Murty vs Amaladasu Baburao	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
OS/59/2020	Dukkipati Surendra babu vs Vsboola Venkateswararao	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
OS/137/2020	Tatikayala Ayyappa Swamy vs Pualparthi Vijaya Kumar	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
OS/143/2021	Vetukuri Ramaraju vs Dangeti Venkateswara Rao	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
OS/151/2020	Gundumenu Ganga Babu vs Mutyala Shivaji	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
OS/249/2019	Rajulapudi Nageswarao vs Bhemarasetti Ramesh Kumar	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
OS/261/2022	Katikireddy Bramaramba vs Nukala Venkata Surya Rajaram	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
OS/281/2019	Cherukuri Subba Rao vs Junnuri Adilakshmi	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/49/2018	SHO, Uppalaguptham PS, Attam Raghupathi vs Vasam venakteswarlu	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/70/2020	The S.H.O, Amalapuram Taluka PS vs Chinthapatla Krishna Rama Mohanrao alias Babu	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/112/2020	SHO, uppalaguptam PS vs Konki Venkateswararao	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/130/2021	S.H.O, Ainavilli P.S. vs Talla Verriyya	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/150/2020	SHO, Amalapuram Taluk PS ANDHRA PRADESH vs Chintha Peddiraju	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/154/2021	S.H.O, Amalapuram Taluqa P.S. vs Mummidivarapu Venkata Ramana	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/156/2018	AP State rep by SI of Police, Uppalaguptam PS vs Mendu Seshi Kumar	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/158/2021	S.H.O., Uppalaguptam P.S. vs Peyyala Nagendrababu	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/168/2021	S.H.O, Uppalaguptam P.S. vs Sundaraneedi Bobby	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/188/2021	S.H.O, Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Kudupudi Venkateswara Rao	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/209/2020	SHO Ainavilli PS ANDHRA PRADESH vs V Venkateswararap	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/261/2021	S.H.O, Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Sanaboyina Satyanarayana	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/264/2019	SHO, Amalapuram Taluk, Amalapuram vs Pilla Malleswararao	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/264/2021	S.H.O, Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Budithi Bushanam alias Bushanam Raju	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/314/2020	SHO, Ainavilli P.S. vs Madda Chantibabu	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/315/2021	S.H.O, Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Janga Rambabu	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/322/2020	SHO, Ainavilli P.S. vs Bonthu Ravi	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/342/2019	SHO, Amalapuram Taluka PS vs Pilla Chandraprakash	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/421/2020	SHO, Uppalaguptam P.S. vs Cheekurumilli Rajasekhar alias Nani	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/422/2020	SHO, Uppalaguptam P.S. vs Cheekurumilli Rajasekhar alias Nani	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/494/2019	SHO, Amalapuram Taluk vs Talam Kondalarao	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/595/2022	The S.H.O.,Amalapuram Taluka P.S vs Yellamilli Ramesh	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/598/2022	The S.H.O.,Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Jukkula Suresh	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/612/2022	The S.H.O.Ainavilli P.S. vs Kommabathula Satyanarayana	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/613/2022	The S.H.O.,Ainavilli P.S, vs Pulidindi Aditya alias Bandu	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/627/2022	The S.H.O.,Ainavilli P.S. vs Devabathula Srinivasa Rao	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/628/2022	The S.H.O.Ainavilli P.S vs Devabathula Bhimaraju	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/629/2022	The S.H.O.Ainavilli P.S vs Seelam Sri Surya	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/646/2022	The S.H.O.,Ainavilli P.S. vs Kondapalli Gangadhara RAo alias Gangadhara Rao alias Yerra abbu	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/648/2021	S.H.O.,Ainavilli P.S. vs Gannavarapu Naveen	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/704/2022	The S.H.O.,Uppalaguptam P.S. vs Dasari Krishna	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/744/2017	SHO, Uppalaguptham PS vs Jalli Suresh	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/792/2021	S.H.O.,Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Muthabathula Venkata Rao	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/846/2019	SHO,Amalapuram taluka PS vs Mattaparthi Srinu	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/1126/2021	The S.H.O.,Amlapuram Taluka P.S. vs Katru Kanaka Durga alias Jyothi	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/1176/2021	The S.H.O.,Ainavilli P.S. vs Konisetti Sai Ganesh	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/2046/2022	The Amalapuram Taluak P.S. vs Balla Venkateswararao	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/2049/2022	The S.H.O.,Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Mekala Srinivasarao	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/2053/2022	The S.H.O.,Uppalaguptam P.S. vs Chappidi Yesubabu	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/2054/2022	The S.H.O.,Uppalaguptam P.S. vs Chappidi Venkataramana	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/2066/2022	The S.H.O.,Uppalaguptam P.S. vs Polinati Subrahmanyam Durga Prasad	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/2189/2022	Sub-Inspector of Police, Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Ganisetti Satyanrayana	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/2191/2022	Sub-Inspector of Police, Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Kasina Ganesh Venkata Teja	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/2196/2022	Sub-Inspector of Police, Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Pati Veera Venkata Satyanarayana	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/2197/2022	Sub-Inspector of Police, Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Nalla Bhanu Prasad @ Bhanu	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/2201/2022	State Sub-Inspector of Police, Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Moturi Veeravenkata Satyanarayana	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/2218/2022	Sub-Inspector of Police, Ainavilli P.S. vs Peyyala Bala Krishna	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/2223/2022	The S.H.O.,Ainavilli P.S. vs Palivela Satyanarayana	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/2229/2022	Sub-Inspector of Police, Uppalaguptam vs Polisetti Baba Sai @ Sai	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/2230/2022	Sub-Inspector of Police, Uppalaguptam P.S. vs Sunkara Venkata Lakshman @ Lakshman	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/2246/2022	Sub-Inspector of Police, UppalaguptamP.S. vs Kola Srinu	12 Nov 2022	Judgment	—
CC/2253/2022	The S.H.O.,Amalapuram Taluaka P.S. vs Dangeti Jyothi Uday Kumar	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2254/2022	The S.H.O. Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Paramata Ramesh	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2255/2022	The S.H.O.,Ainavilli P.S. vs Pithani Suresh	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2256/2022	The S.H.O.,Ainavilli P.S. vs Rayudu Pradeep	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2257/2022	The S.H.O.,Ainavilli P.S. vs Mudragada Srinu	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2258/2022	The S.H.O.,Ainavilli P.S. vs Revu Kotharaju	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2259/2022	The S.H.O.,Ainvilli P.S. vs Challa Jyothi Dhanaraju	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2260/2022	The S.H.O.,Ainavilli P.S. vs Pithani Nagendra Kumar	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2261/2022	The S.H.O.,Ainavilli P.S. vs Ayudam Gouri	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2270/2022	The S.H.O.,Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Varasala Nagaraju	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/2312/2022	The S.H.O, Uppalaguptam P.S. vs Arigela Veera Venkata Satyanarayana	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
CC/2331/2022	The S.H.O, Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Kadimi Gangaraju	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2334/2022	The S.H.O.,Amalapuram Taluaka PS vs Metla Nagaraju	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2335/2022	The S.H.O.,Amalapuram Taluka PS vs Janipalli Dorababu	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2336/2022	The S.H.O.,Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Paramata Durga Prasad	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2337/2022	The S.H.O.,Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Konda Satyanarayana	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2338/2022	The S.H.O.,Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Tholeti Durga Prasad	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2339/2022	The S.H.O., Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Komali Ramakrishna	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2340/2022	The S.H.O.,Amalapuram Taluaka P.S. vs Surampudi Siva	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2341/2022	The S.H.O.,Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Bokka Venkatesh	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2342/2022	The S.H.O.,Amalapuram Taluaka P.S vs Ganta Srinivasarao	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2344/2022	The S.H.O.,Amalapuram Taluaka P.S vs Beera Nagarjuna	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2346/2022	The S.H.O.,Amalapuram Taluaka P.S. vs Karem Arjuna Rao	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2347/2022	The S.H.O.,Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Paramsetti Srinivasarao	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2348/2022	The S.H.O.,Amalapuram Taluaka P.S vs Tarapatla Srinu	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2349/2022	The S.H.O.,Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Paramata Durga Prasad	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2351/2022	The S.H.O., Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Kamana Krishna	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2352/2022	The S.H.O.,Amalapuram Taluka P.S vs Satti Satyanarayana	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
CC/2366/2022	The S.H.O.,Amalapuram Taluka P.S. vs Medisetti Pallamraju	12 Nov 2022	Order	—

Showing 100 of 3,412 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Nov 2022		640
Oct 2022		29
Sep 2022		35
Aug 2022		1,106
Jul 2022		156
Jun 2022		161
May 2022		38
Apr 2022		136
Mar 2022		340
Feb 2022		15
Jan 2022		57
Dec 2021		82

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Smt. Y. Sri Lakshmi handled?

Smt. Y. Sri Lakshmi has handled 3491 court orders since 2020 at II Addl District Court Amalapuram. The average disposal rate is 125 orders per month.

What types of cases does Smt. Y. Sri Lakshmi hear?

Based on available records, Smt. Y. Sri Lakshmi primarily handles Criminal matters (Criminal Cases, CRL) and Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) at II Addl District Court Amalapuram.

Where is Smt. Y. Sri Lakshmi currently posted?

Smt. Y. Sri Lakshmi is posted as Special Magistrate, Amalapuram at II Addl District Court Amalapuram, East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Smt. Y. Sri Lakshmi available online?

Yes. 17 judgments by Smt. Y. Sri Lakshmi are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Smt. Y. Sri Lakshmi dispose cases?

Smt. Y. Sri Lakshmi disposes approximately 125 cases per month, based on 3491 orders handled over their tenure at II Addl District Court Amalapuram.

Since when is Smt. Y. Sri Lakshmi serving?

Smt. Y. Sri Lakshmi has been serving at II Addl District Court Amalapuram since 2020.

Case Types

CC 78%

OS 13%

EP 3%

CRLMP 2%

CRL 2%

PRC 1%

A 0%

FDP 0%

Posting History

Jul 2022 — Nov 2022

Special Magistrate, Amalapuram · 5 orders
Apr 2022 — Aug 2022

Addl. Civil Judge( Junior Division)-Cum-Addl. J.M.F.C, Amalapuram · 709 orders
Jul 2020 — Nov 2022

Principal Civil Judge( Junior Division)-cum- J.M.F.C, Amalapuram · 2,419 orders
Jul 2020 — Feb 2021

Addl. Civil Judge( Junior Division)-Cum-Addl. J.M.F.C, Amalapuram · 358 orders

Outcomes on Record

Convicted 6

Acquitted 5

Other Judges at this Court

G.Chandramouleswari

II Additional District Judge Amalapuram

3 orders

Ganta Priyadarsini

XIV Additional District Judge Amalapuram

0 orders

Kethavath Moti Lal

Asst. Sessions and Senior Civil Judge, Amalapuram

4 orders

Mohammed Rahamtulla

Principal Civil Judge( Junior Division)-cum- J.M.F...

1,323 orders

Ms Sunkara Srirekha

Addl. Civil Judge( Junior Division)-Cum-Addl. J.M....

1,164 orders

Sri P.V. Prasada Rao

Special Magistrate, Amalapuram

545 orders

← View all judges at II Addl District Court Amalapuram