Q.45
Evidence Act & Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Medium Act + Section Given
Bare Act Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 · Section 78(2) BSA

As per Section 78(2) of the BSA 2023, presumption about the officer signing or certifying a document is:

A The officer's signature is assumed to be forgery
B The officer did not hold the claimed office at the time of signing
The officer held the official character claimed when signing or certifying the document Answer
D The document's authenticity is independent of the official's official character
📋

Explanation & Strategy

Click any section to expand · only one open at a time

This is a 'presumption of regularity' in official acts — the legal system assumes that public officers act within their authority unless proven otherwise. Section 78(2) creates a rebuttable presumption that the signing officer genuinely held the official position they claim. The burden shifts to the party challenging the document to prove that the officer lacked authority. This facilitates the admissibility of official documents without requiring the state to prove every officer's credentials every time.

The text reads: Section 78(2) BSA: The court shall presume that the officer who signed or certified a document held the official character which he claims at the time of signing.

⚖️ New Criminal Law Mapping (AIBE XXI onwards)

Old: Evidence Act S.79 New: BSA S.78(2)

BSA S.78(2) carries forward the presumption of regularity from Evidence Act S.79.

At a Glance
Subject Evidence Act & Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam
Difficulty Medium
Act Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023
Section Section 78(2) BSA
Answer (C) Act + Section Given
Paper AIBE XIX — December 2024
Progress in Paper
Q.45 100 questions

45% through paper

📖 Open Book — Reading Mode Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023