Q.60
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) Medium Knowledge-Based
Bare Act Constitution of India · Article 21, Article 23

1980s bonded labour case – what did SC hold?

A Right to free legal aid is only directive, not fundamental
B Monetary relief only, no systemic reforms
Right against forced labour is fundamental right under Art. 21 Answer
D Only govt. agencies can file labour petitions
📋

Explanation & Strategy

Click any section to expand · only one open at a time

The Supreme Court in Bandhua Mukti Morcha vs. Union of India (1984) held that bonded labour violates the fundamental right to life and personal liberty under Article 21, read with Article 23's prohibition on forced labour. The court recognized that economic compulsion forcing people into bonded servitude was constitutionally impermissible and directed comprehensive rehabilitation measures. This was a landmark PIL establishing that forced labour is not just a criminal offence but a fundamental rights violation.

At a Glance
Subject Public Interest Litigation (PIL)
Difficulty Medium
Act Constitution of India
Section Article 21, Article 23
Answer (C) Knowledge-Based
Paper AIBE XIX — December 2024
Progress in Paper
Q.60 100 questions

60% through paper

📖 Open Book — Reading Mode Constitution of India