Q.62
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) Medium Knowledge-Based
Bare Act Constitution of India · Article 32, S.P. Gupta vs. UOI (1981)

Assertion (A): The concept of "locus standi" is relaxed in PIL cases. Reason (R): PIL allows any public-spirited person to approach the court on behalf of those who cannot represent themselves.

Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A) Answer
B Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
C (A) is true, but (R) is false
D (A) is false, and (R) is true
📋

Explanation & Strategy

Click any section to expand · only one open at a time

Both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason directly explains the assertion. The relaxation of locus standi is the procedural mechanism through which PIL operates — it allows third parties to represent the voiceless. This was established in S.P. Gupta vs. Union of India (1981), where the SC held that any member of the public can approach the court in the interest of those who are unable to do so. The reason (representative standing for the disadvantaged) is precisely why locus standi was relaxed.

At a Glance
Subject Public Interest Litigation (PIL)
Difficulty Medium
Act Constitution of India
Section Article 32, S.P. Gupta vs. UOI (1981)
Answer (A) Knowledge-Based
Paper AIBE XIX — December 2024
Progress in Paper
Q.62 100 questions

62% through paper

📖 Open Book — Reading Mode Constitution of India