Q.81
Tort, MV Act & Consumer Protection Medium Knowledge-Based
Bare Act Law of Torts · Read vs. Coker (1853)

Mr B told Mr A to leave premises occupied by Mr A. When Mr A refused, Mr B collected workmen who surrounded Mr A, tucked up their sleeves and aprons and threatened to break his neck, but did not touch him. Under which tortious act can Mr A file the case?

A False Imprisonment
Assault Answer
C Battery
D Hurt
📋

Explanation & Strategy

Click any section to expand · only one open at a time

This scenario mirrors the classic case of Read vs. Coker. The workers surrounded Mr A, rolled up their sleeves, and threatened physical violence — creating a reasonable apprehension of imminent force. Since no actual physical contact occurred, it's assault (not battery, which requires touching). It's not false imprisonment because Mr A wasn't prevented from leaving — he was being threatened to leave. 'Hurt' is a criminal law concept (IPC/BNS), not a tort law category.

At a Glance
Subject Tort, MV Act & Consumer Protection
Difficulty Medium
Act Law of Torts
Section Read vs. Coker (1853)
Answer (B) Knowledge-Based
Paper AIBE XIX — December 2024
Progress in Paper
Q.81 100 questions

81% through paper