Q.99
Intellectual Property Laws Medium Act + Section Given
Bare Act Trade Marks Act, 1999 · Section 29 (Infringement)

Soham created an app called "FitLife" with registered trademark and copyrighted source code. A competing app "LyfWell" has similar logo and features. Under trademark law, can Soham claim infringement for the use of a similar name and logo?

Yes, if he can prove that the names are confusingly similar Answer
B No, because the competing app has a different name and logo
C Yes, but only if the competitor is a small business
D No, trademark infringement can only occur if there is identical copying
📋

Explanation & Strategy

Click any section to expand · only one open at a time

Trademark infringement under Section 29 covers not just identical marks but also 'deceptively similar' marks that are likely to cause public confusion. The test is whether an average consumer, with imperfect recollection, would be confused between the two marks. 'FitLife' and 'LyfWell' with similar logos could well be deceptively similar — the court would assess visual, phonetic, and conceptual similarity. The competitor's size is irrelevant, and identical copying is not required — the law protects against confusing similarity.

The text reads: Section 29 TM Act: A registered trademark is infringed by use of a mark that is identical with or deceptively similar to it, in relation to similar goods/services, where such use is likely to cause confusion.
At a Glance
Subject Intellectual Property Laws
Difficulty Medium
Act Trade Marks Act, 1999
Section Section 29 (Infringement)
Answer (A) Act + Section Given
Paper AIBE XIX — December 2024
Progress in Paper
Q.99 100 questions

99% through paper

📖 Open Book — Reading Mode Trade Marks Act, 1999