Smt. B. Krishnaveni

FAC-Principal Senior Civil Judge's Court,Gudivada

XI-ADJ Court Complex Gudivada · Krishna · Andhra Pradesh

Smt. B. Krishnaveni, FAC-Principal Senior Civil Judge's Court,Gudivada, is posted at XI-ADJ Court Complex Gudivada, Krishna, Andhra Pradesh, India. 849 court orders on record since 2017. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, H, EP cases.

849

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

H.M.O.P/63/2018

Vasa Sai Babu vs Vasa Yogitha

23 Aug 2018

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GUDIVADA.

PRESENT: SMT.B.KRISHNAVENI,

Principal Senior Civil Judge, MTM

FAC/Prl.Senior Civil Judge, Gudivada

Thursday, the 23rd day of August, 2018.

H.M.O.P.NO.63/2018

Between

Vasa Sai Babu, S/o.Paparao, Hindu, aged 23 years, R/o.Dr.No.8/1-6, NTR colony, Gudivada.

...Petitioner.

And

Vasa Yogitha, W/o.Vasa Sai Babu, D/o.Siddani Heanth Babu, Hindu, aged about 22 years, House wife, R/o.Dr.No.8/224, Sri Rampuram,

Gudivada, Gudivada Mandal. ...Respondent

This petition has come up on 21.08.2018 for hearing in the presence of Sri T.Srinivasulu, counsel for petitioner and respondent was set ex-parte and upon perusing the material on record and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court has delivered the following:

O R D E R

1.This petition is filed U/sec.13(ia)(ib) of Hindu

Marriage Act for dissolution of the marriage between the petitioner-Vasa Saibabu and respondent-Vasa Yogitha dt.25.02.2017 by way of decree divorce.

2.The brief averments of the petition are as follows:

a)The petitioner and respondent are legally wedded husband and wife and their marriage was performed on 25.02.2017 at the house of petitioner in NTR colony, Gudivada as per Hindu rites and customs in the presence of their relatives, friends and caste elders. Soon after the marriage, the marriage was consummated. The petitioner and the respondent lead 2 happy marital life for one month only. During their wedlock no children were born to them.

b) The respondent used to visit the house of her parents frequently without intimating to the petitioner, as she stated that she has no interested to marry him and without her consent her parents performed the marriage of the respondent with the petitioner and when the petitioner asked the respondent about her visiting of her parents house she stated that the petitioner has to come and join with her parents and to live with her in her parents village and to lead marital life with the petitioner at Srirampuram, Gudivada for which the petitioner refused to the proposal of the respondent, as the parents and relatives of the petitioner are residing in NTR colony, Gudivada and on that the respondent bore grudge against the petitioner and quarreled with him now and then without any justifiable cause.

c) The respondent always defamed the petitioner in the society and also in the house as the petitioner is not competent to marry her and there is no combination in between both of them and she also insulted the petitioner and she always criticized the petitioner before his friends and relatives. From the date of marriage the respondent insisted and demanded the petitioner to provide luxurious life, for which on several occasions the petitioner requested and also stated that he is has no sufficient means to maintain the petitioner, respondent and his family members, for which the respondent increased aversion 3 towards the petitioner and harassed him both in mentally and physically.

d)The respondent frequently went to the house of the parents of the respondent and always the petitioner went to her parents house and requested the respondent to come and join him for leading marital life and taken back the respondent into his marital fold. While matters stood thus on 15.04.2017 the respondent went to the house of her parents without intimating to the petitioner and after coming to know about the said fact, the petitioner along with the mediators went to the house of parents of the respondent and requested the respondent and taken back her into his marital fold and living in NTR colony,

Gudivada, Gudivada Mandal. Later after few days the parents of the respondent came to the house of petitioner and quarreled with him and abused him in filthy language so stating that the respondent has no interest to lead marital life with the petitioner and due to that some altercation took place in between the petitioner, parents of the respondent and respondent and went away leaving the respondent in the house of petitioner. On 25.04.2017 the respondent went away to the house of her parents without intimating the same to the petitioner and coming to know the petitioner and parents of the petitioner went to the house of the parents of the respondent and requested to come and joint with him for leading marital life by put up separate family at Gudivada, for which she refused to come and joint with him and so stating that if he wants the respondent, the petitioner himself came to the house of parents of the respondent by 4 intimating the same to her prior to his visit and that she will not come to Gudivada for leading marital life with the petitioner and she also abused the petitioner in filthy language. The respondent also made several attempts to take back the respondent into the marital fold of the petitioner but the mediations and attempts are proved futile.

e) Due to the above reasons of the respondent without any justifiable cause and harassed the petitioner both mentally and physically and she did not provide basic necessities and she did not discharge her duties as a dutiful wife towards the petitioner and deserted him. the petitioner further submits that as he waited all these months only due to affection and love against the respondent, but his desires are proved futile only because of the arrogant and adamant behaviour of the respondent and due to the above arrogant behavior the petitioner suffered both mentally and physically and the respondent harassed him which amounts to cruelty and the respondent left the marital fold of the petitioner since one year which amounts to desertion. In the above circumstances the marriage of the petitioner and respondent irretrievably broken down. Hence, this petitioner is filing this petition for grant of decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent.

3.On 10.08.2018 after receipt of summons the respondent called absent. No representation and hence she was set exparte and the matter is posted for petitioner side evidence.

4.Heard the counsel for petitioner.

5.In order to prove the case of petitioner, petitioner himself is examined as PW1 and Ex.P1 and P2 are marked.

During the course of evidence, PW1 reiterated his contentions in the petition.

6.In the absence of any evidence from the side of the respondent, the contention of the petitioner remains unchallenged by the respondent.

7.The evidence of PW1 clearly establishes that the petitioner being vexed with the attitude of respondent and though they made several conciliatory efforts for reunion but all are proved futile, Hence he filed this petition. Hence in the said circumstances, the petitioner is entitled for decree for divorce as the respondent is guilty of cruelty.

9.In the result, the petition is allowed, the marriage between the petitioner-Vasa Saibabu and respondent-Vasa

Yogitha took place on 25.02.2017 is dissolved by way of decree of divorce.

Typed to my dictation by Stenographer and

pronounced by me in open court, on this 23 rd day of August,

2018.

Principal Senior Civil Judge,

Machilipatnam. FAC/ Principal Senior Civil Judge, Gudivada.

Appendix of Evidence

Witness examined

For petitioner :

PW1: Vasa Sai babu 6

For respondent : None

Documents marked

For petitioner :

Ex.A1: Wedding card, dt.25.02.2017 Ex.A2: Marriage photos two in number.

For respondent : Nil

PSCJ, MTM.

FAC/PSCJ, Gudivada.

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GUDIVADA.

PRESENT: SMT.B.KRISHNAVENI,

Principal Senior Civil Judge, MTM

FAC/Prl.Senior Civil Judge, Gudivada

Thursday, the 23rd day of August, 2018.

H.M.O.P.NO.63/2018

Between

Vasa Sai Babu, S/o.Paparao, Hindu, aged 23

years, R/o.Dr.No.8/1-6, NTR colony, Gudivada. ...Petitioner.

And

Vasa Yogitha, W/o.Vasa Sai Babu, D/o.Siddani Heanth Babu, Hindu, aged about 22 years, House wife, R/o.Dr.No.8/224, Sri Rampuram,

Gudivada, Gudivada Mandal. ...Respondent

1.This petition is filed U/sec.13(ia)(ib) of Hindu Marriage Act for dissolution of the marriage between the petitioner-Vasa Saibabu and respondent-Vasa Yogitha dt.25.02.2017 by way of decree divorce.

2. Petition presented on: 08.06.2018

3. A fixed court fee of Rs.10/- is paid Under Art.I (vii) Sch.II of A.P.C.F. & SV Act.

4. This petition has come up on 21.08.2018 for hearing in the presence of Sri T.Srinivasulu, counsel for petitioner and respondent was set ex-parte and upon perusing the material on record and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this court has doth order and DECREE;

1. that the petition be and the same is hereby allowed;

2. that the marriage between the petitioner-Vasa Saibabu and respondent-Vasa Yogitha took place on 25.02.2017 is dissolved by way of decree of divorce.

3. that there will be no order as to costs.

Given under my hand and the seal of the court, this the 23rd day of August, 2018.

Principal Senior Civil Judge,

Machilipatnam. FAC/ Principal Senior Civil Judge, Gudivada. Memo Of Costs -- Nil--

PSCJ,MTM

FAC/PSCJ, Gudivada.

Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Gudivada.

H.M.O.P/48/2018

Mutyala Venkateswara Rao vs Mutyala Swapna Priyanka

17 Aug 2018

H.M.O.P.48/2018 1 Prl. Senior Civil Judge,

Dt.17.08.2018. Machilipatnam.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

AT GUDIVADA

Present : B.Krishna Veni Prl.Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam. FAC.Prl.Senior Civil Judge, Gudiavda.

Friday, this the 17th day of August, 2018.

H.M.O.P.No. 48/2018

Between:

Mutyala Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Radha Krishna, Hindu, age 26 years, R/o. Kondiparru village, Pamarru Mandal.

.... Petitioner.

And:

Mutyala Swapna Priyanka, W/o.Mutyala Venkateswara Rao, D/o. Chalamasetti Prabhakara Rao, Hindu, age 23 years, R/o. Chinakamanapudi village, Mudinepalli Mandal, Krishna District. ...… Respondent.

This petition came up on 16.08.2018 for hearing before me in the presence of Sri.S.N.D.A.V.Prasad, Advocate for the petitioner and the respondent having remained exparte and upon hearing both sides and the matter having stood over till this day for consideration, this Court made the following:

:: O R D E R ::

1.This petition is filed under Sec.13 (1)(ia)(ib) of Hindu Marriage Act 1955 seeking for divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion.

2. The petitioner Mutyala Venkateswara Rao averred that the respondent –

Mutyala Swapna Priyanka are husband and wife and that their marriage was performed on 06.03.2015 at Sri Subrahmanyeswara Swamy Temple, Singarayapalem village,

Mudinepalli Mandal, as per Hindu Rites and Customs in the presence of both side relatives, friends and elders. At the time of marriage due to love and affection the petitioner did not take any dowry or lanchanams from the parents of the respondent and marriage was performed with the expenses of the petitioner’s parents. Immediately the marriage was consummated and the respondent was joined with the petitioner at

Kondiparru village to lead happy marital life. From the beginning the respondent did not cooperate to lead happy marital life and did not show any love and affection towards the

H.M.O.P.48/2018 2 Prl. Senior Civil Judge,

Dt.17.08.2018. Machilipatnam.

petitioner. The respondent started harassing the petitioner both physically and mentally.

The respondent did not prepare food and did not participate on house hold work. The respondent went to her parents house frequently without knowledge and consent of the petitioner. Due to love and affection towards the respondent, the petitioner took the respondent to matrimonial house to lead happy marital life. The petitioner asked about her behaviour, then the respondent replied that she don’t have love and affection towards the petitioner and the marriage was performed against the respondent’s wish and will.

The petitioner several times requested the respondent to change her attitude and lead happy marital life with him. But the respondent did not heed the words of the petitioner.

The respondent insisted the petitioner to buy luxurious items and to lead luxurious life and demanded the petitioner to shift the family to the parents of the respondent village.

But the petitioner refused for the same and requested the respondent that his parents were suffering from old age. Due to that the respondent harassed the petitioner, his parents and making galata with the neighoburs. The respondent always quarreling with the petitioner, his parents and also with neighbours without any reason or sufficient cause. On 20.12.2015 the respondent created nuisance and made galata and went to her parents house without fault of the petitioner. The petitioner went to the house of the parents of the respondent and requested the respondent to come and join with him to lead marital life. But the respondent refused to come and join with the petitioner and demanded the petitioner to shift the family to her parents village, but the petitioner refused for the same and openly proclaiming that the respondent will give divorce to the petitioner. The respondent never behaved as a dutiful wife and never shown love and affection towards the petitioner. The respondent completely neglected the petitioner and harassed him both physically and mentally. The respondent did not perform happy marital life. The petitioner also sent his parents and elders for mediations. But the respondent bluntly refused to come and join with the petitioner and his attempts proved futile. The petitioner is having so much love and affection towards the respondent and waited till today that the respondent will change her attitude and join with the petitioner but they are proved futile. The respondent deserted the petitioner without fault of the

H.M.O.P.48/2018 3 Prl. Senior Civil Judge,

Dt.17.08.2018. Machilipatnam.

petitioner. Finally the petitioner gave registered notice on 24.04.2018 to the respondent demanding her to come and join with the petitioner and lead happy marital life, the respondent received the said notice on 25.04.2018 and did not comply with the demand of the petitioner and did not join with the petitioner to lead happy marital life. Hence, the petition.

3. On receipt of notice, the respondent did not make appearance and the respondent remained exparte.

4. During the course of enquiry, the petitioner Mutyala Venkateswara Rao examined himself as P.W.1 and he got marked Ex.P1 to Ex.P.3.

5. Point for consideration:

“Whether, the petitioner is entitled for dissolution of the marriage

dt.06.03.2015 on the grounds of cruelty and desertion ?”

6. As noted above, during the course of trial of this petition, the petitioner

Mutyala Venkateswara Rao examined himself as P.W.1 and he filed an affidavit under

Order XVIII Rule4 of CPC, which is found to be verbatim similar to the contents of his petition. He deposed about their marriage and about the disputes and the respondent deserted the petitioner. He sought for divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion.

As noted above, the respondent Mutyala Swapna Priyanaka did not make appearance.

She remained exparte. She did not crossexamine PW.1Mutyala Venkateswara Rao.

Hence, the evidence of PW.1 Mutyala Venkateswara Rao should be treated as true and correct.

7. Considering the evidence of P.W.1 Mutyala Venkateswara Rao, Ex.P.1 wedding card dt.06.03.2015, Ex.P.2 is the office copy of the legal notice dt. 24.04.2018 and Ex.P.3 is the family photo of the petitioner and respondent stands proved. It is the specific case of the petitioner that the respondent harassed him. As seen from the record, he filed this petition on 27.04.2018. If that be true, the petitioner is entitled for divorce on the ground of cruelty and desertion.

H.M.O.P.48/2018 4 Prl. Senior Civil Judge,

Dt.17.08.2018. Machilipatnam.

8. IN THE RESULT, the petition is allowed granting divorce to the petitioner Mutyala Venkateswara Rao dissolving his marriage with the respondent

Mutyala Swapna Priyanka performed on 06.03.2015 on the grounds of cruelty and

desertion.

Typed to my dictation on my Laptop by the Personal Assistant, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court, this the 17 th day of August, 2018.

Principal Senior Civil Judge,

Machilipatnam. FAC..Principal Senior Civil Judge, Gudivada.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Oral Evidence

For Petitioner For Respondent

PW.1: Mutyala Venkateswara RaoNone

Documentary Evidence

For Petitioner For Respondent

Ex.P.1 wedding card dt. 06.03.2015 Nil Ex.P.2 – office copy of the legal notice dt. 24.04.2018 Ex.P.3 – family photo of the petitioner and respondent.

FAC. PSCJ/GVD.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

AT GUDIVADA

Present : B.Krishna Veni Prl.Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam. FAC.Prl.Senior Civil Judge, Gudiavda.

Friday, this the 17th day of August, 2018.

H.M.O.P.No. 48/2018

Between:

Mutyala Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Radha Krishna, Hindu, age 26 years,

R/o. Kondiparru village, Pamarru Mandal. .... Petitioner.

And:

Mutyala Swapna Priyanka, W/o.Mutyala Venkateswara Rao, D/o. Chalamasetti Prabhakara Rao, Hindu, age 23 years, R/o. Chinakamanapudi village, Mudinepalli Mandal, Krishna District. ...… Respondent.

This petition is filed on 20.02.2018 under Sec.13 (1)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act 1955 seeking for divorce on the grounds of cruelty.

Petition filed on: 27.04.2018

DECREE

a)that the petition be and is hereby allowed granting divorce to the petitioner Mutyala Venkateswara Rao dissolving his marriage with the respondent Mutyala Swapna Priyanka performed on 06.03.2015 on the grounds of cruelty and desertion and;

b)that each party do bear their own costs.

Given under my hand and seal of this Court, this the 17 th day of August, 2018.

Principal Senior Civil Judge,

Machilipatnam.

FAC..Principal Senior Civil Judge,

Gudivada.

MEMO OF COSTS: NIL.

FAC. PSCJ/GVD.

H.M.O.P/16/2018

Katta Balakrishna vs Katta Gayatri

29 Aug 2018

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GUDIVADA

Present: Sri I.SRINIVASA MURTHY,

Principal Senior Civil Judge, Gudivada.

Wednesday, this the 29 th day of August, 2018

H.M.O.P. No. 16/2018

Between :

Katta Balakrishna, S/o. Tatayya, Hindu, aged 32 …Petitioner years, Advocate, resident of D.No. 5/84-13-1, Valivarthipadu road, Driver Nagar, Gudivada.

AND Katta Gayatri, W/o. Balakrishna, d/o. Naragani …Respondent Chandrasekhara Rao, Hindu, aged 26 years, house wife, resident of Geeta Mandiram road, near Vishnu Temple, Vuyyuru.

The petition filed under Sec. 9 of Hindu Marriage Act, to pass order in favour of petitioner, directing the respondent to come to the house of the petitioner and to live with him for discharging her conjugal obligations.

This ORIGINAL PETITION filed by Sri. R.A. Naresh, Advocate for petitioner and Sri T. Chantibabu, advocate for respondent and on 29-08-2018 the petitioner filed a memo not pressing the O.P and this Court has made the following :

O R D E R

Petitioner filed a memo not pressing the OP. Heard the counsel

for petitioner. Hence the petition is dismissed as not pressed. No

costs.

Pronounced by me in the open court that this 29 th day of

August, 2018.

Prl.Senior Civil Judge, Gudivada

Appendix of Evidence

Witness examined

Nil

PSCJ, GDV.

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GUDIVADA

Present: Sri I.SRINIVASA MURTHY,

Principal Senior Civil Judge, Gudivada.

Wednesday, this the 29 th day of August, 2018

H.M.O.P. No. 16/2018

Between :

Katta Balakrishna, S/o. Tatayya, Hindu, aged 32 …Petitioner years, Advocate, resident of D.No. 5/84-13-1, Valivarthipadu road, Driver Nagar, Gudivada.

AND Katta Gayatri, W/o. Balakrishna, d/o. Naragani …Respondent Chandrasekhara Rao, Hindu, aged 26 years, house wife, resident of Geeta Mandiram road, near Vishnu Temple, Vuyyuru.

Petition present on : 05-02-2018 Numbered on : 08-02-2018

A fixed Court Fee of Rs.10/- is paid under Sch.II, Art I(VII) of A.P.C.F. and S.V Act.

This original petition coming before me in the presence of Sri. R.A. Naresh, Advocate for petitioner and Sri T. Chanti Babu, advocate for respondent and on 29-08-2018 the petitioner filed a memo not pressing the OP, this Court doth order and decree:

i) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed, ii) that there be no order as to costs.

Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 29 th day of August,

2018.

Prl.Senior Civil Judge, Gudivada

Memo of costs

Nil

PSCJ, GDV.

H.M.O.P/136/2012

Balla Murali vs Kommuri Mahitha Thayaru

29 Aug 2018

EP/108/2017

Dasari Soma Sekhar vs Vallabhaneni Prasanna Lakshmi

29 Aug 2018

Order Record 842 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OS/80/2018	DUDALA GANDHI vs MIRIYALA LAKSHMI	30 Apr 2019	Other	—
H.M.O.P/122/2018	KUMBHAM SAMBASIVA RAO vs KUMBHAM BHARATHI	30 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/132/2018	CHALAMALASETTI NAGASAI RAVITEJA PRATHAP and ANOTHER vs NIL	30 Apr 2019	Order	—
OS/16/2018	BODDU NIRMALA vs KOTAPROLU ANJI BABU	29 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
OS/249/2012	Abdul Munaf vs Gowsiya Rezwana and another	26 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
CC/5/2018	THE STATE GOVT.REP.BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE. GUDIVADA RURAL CIRCLE vs GANTA SRINIVASA RAO	24 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
OS/55/2018	Chatragadda Sudheer Kumar vs Yerravalli Pardhasaradhi	23 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
OS/125/2018	Tankala Chinnammadu vs Pothuraju Chinnammadu	23 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
OS/381/2014	Chillimunta Baby Sarojini vs Vemula Vakalaiah	18 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
OS/17/2016	Kolapalli Satya Aruna Kumari vs Akber Saheb	17 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
OS/127/2018	Canara Bank vs Thota Bhavya Sri	17 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
OS/71/2018	GUGGILLA SIVA NAGA MURALI KRISHNA vs CHITTAJALLU DURGA RAO	16 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/25/2018	NADELLA KANAKA DURGA vs NADELLA MADHU BABU	15 Apr 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/152/2018	EDUPUGANTI SUBRAHMANYESWARA RAO vs EDUPUGANTI VENKATA LAKSHMI	15 Apr 2019	Order	—
S.O.P/1/2019	KANDIKATLA JULAIN and ANOTHER vs THE POST MASTER and ANOTHER	12 Apr 2019	Order	—
EP/113/2018	THOTA VANI @ RAMPURAPU VANI vs THOTA NAGA SESHU	10 Apr 2019	Order	—
OS/129/2018	Yedumbakula Ramkumar vs Odugu Somayya	10 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/12/2019	KOKKILIGADDA @ TIRUMALASETTI ADILAKSHMI vs TIRUMALASETTI NAGARAJU	09 Apr 2019	Order	—
OS/35/2018	BETHU SIVA KUMAR vs VEGE PARVATHI	08 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/104/2017	Perakam Balanjaneyulu vs Perakam Sreedevi	08 Apr 2019	Decree	—
OS/57/2018	Moka Basavaiah vs Yarravalli Pardhasaradhi	04 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
OS/124/2017	PEDANA MUNICIPALITY vs BATTA DIVAKAR	04 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
OS/185/2015	MADDALA VENKATESWARA RAO vs AMARESH GNANA MOTE	03 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/24/2019	BATHULA NAGA JYOTHI @ SIVA NAGA JYOTHI vs BATTULA RAM GOPAL	03 Apr 2019	Order	—
OS/97/2017	Adapala Veera Venkata Satyanarayana Vara Prasad vs Adapa Venkata Nancharamma	02 Apr 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/120/2018	PETLA TILAK VIDYA SAGAR and another vs NIL	02 Apr 2019	Order	—
OS/105/2017	Md.Abdullah vs Shaik Zaheer	01 Apr 2019	Other	—
H.M.O.P/78/2018	AVULA NAGA SRINIVASA RAO vs AVULA VANI alias KILARAPU VANI alias NAGAVANI	01 Apr 2019	Decree	—
H.M.O.P/118/2018	KUNASANI SURESH and another vs NIL	29 Mar 2019	Order	—
EP/20/2018	MEDURI LAKSHMI vs ANISETTI ESWARA RAO	28 Mar 2019	Order	—
EP/133/2017	TADIKONDA DURGA NAGA VENKATA RAJA KUMAR vs M.D.D.S.ASEERVADAM	28 Mar 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/126/2018	YAKKATI ANIL CHAKRAVARTHI and ANOTHER vs NIL	28 Mar 2019	Order	—
OS/264/2017	MANDAPAKA KRISHNA MOHAN vs SALA SRINIVASA RAO and ANOTHER	27 Mar 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/97/2015	Kothamasu Sunitha vs Kotamasu Naga Venkata Suresh Babu	26 Mar 2019	Order	—
OS/52/2018	Pamarthi Naveen Kumar vs Petla Mariyamma	25 Mar 2019	Judgment	—
OS/198/2017	Kunche Sri Venkata Gurunadha Durga Prasad vs Nakka Dhana Lakshmi	25 Mar 2019	Judgment	—
OS/256/2017	BODDULA NARESH BABU vs YEDDU RAJESWARAMMA and ANOTHER	19 Mar 2019	Judgment	—
OS/305/2014	Koka Venkata RangaMani vs Bolem Ramulamma	19 Mar 2019	Judgment	—
OS/76/2018	CHANDIKA VENKATA RAMACHANDRA RAO vs NEELI TRINADHA RAO	18 Mar 2019	Other	—
OS/111/2017	Corporation Bank vs VSRVMS.Prathyusha	18 Mar 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/20/2016	Kanikisetti Sri Manhalakshmi Poojitha vs Kanikisetti Sai Madhav	18 Mar 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/80/2018	DASARI NAGA SIVAIAH vs DASARI SARIKA alias VALLARAPU SARIKA	15 Mar 2019	Decree	—
H.M.O.P/176/2018	PARASA NAGA RANI vs PARASA RAGHAVENDRA RAO	15 Mar 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/41/2014	Katta Dakshina Murthy vs Katta Anitha	14 Mar 2019	Order	—
OS/142/2017	Gelli Venkata Satyanaryana vs Kandula Jaya Babu	13 Mar 2019	Judgment	—
OS/163/2013	Akulamannati Chilakamarri Lakshmi Andal vs Akulamannati Chilakamarri Sesha Ramanuja Chary	13 Mar 2019	Judgment	—
OS/168/2018	KOLAPALLI SATYA ARUNA KUMARI vs BANDI SIVA	12 Mar 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/124/2018	MALLAVARAPU SANJEEVA RAO vs MALLAVARAPU SARADA RANI	12 Mar 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/41/2018	Mandapati Sirisha vs Mandapati Venkateswara Rao	11 Mar 2019	Order	—
OS/65/2016	Josyula Venkata Krishnayya vs Samayam Estharu	09 Mar 2019	Other	—
OS/249/2017	KASA CHANDRAM vs RAMISETTY SYAMALA	09 Mar 2019	Other	—
H.M.O.P/1/2018	DASAM VENKATA RANGA SURI vs DASAM SIVA PARVATHI	08 Mar 2019	Order	—
EP/99/2018	NOOKALA DHANALAKSHMI vs SK.HUSSAIN	06 Mar 2019	Order	—
OS/231/2017	BOLLA RAVINDRANATH TAGORE vs KATTA MAHESH KUMAR RAJA	06 Mar 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/4/2019	MANCHIMSETTI PALLAVI @ CHANDU PALLAVI vs MANCHIMSETTI DEEPAK	05 Mar 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/72/2018	VARRE MURALIKRISHNA vs VARRE SRIDEVI	05 Mar 2019	Order	—
OS/53/2017	Jonnala Kannaiah vs Natta Koteswaramma	01 Mar 2019	Judgment	—
OS/229/2017	YERRAMSETTI SURESH BABU vs CHUNNAPURAPU VANA MOHANA RAO	28 Feb 2019	Judgment	—
OS/243/2017	YARA NAGA VENKATA PRASAD vs PATAN KAMURUNNISSA	28 Feb 2019	Judgment	—
OS/257/2017	SANKU SRINIVAS vs VADDANAPU YACOB	27 Feb 2019	Judgment	—
OS/188/2018	VATTIPROLU KUMAR SWAMY vs PARISE SUJATHA	26 Feb 2019	Judgment	—
OS/190/2017	DUDALA GANDHI vs MANNEM SIVA NAGA MALLESWARA RAO	26 Feb 2019	Judgment	—
OS/362/2014	Revu Samba Siva Rao vs Revu Arjunudu	26 Feb 2019	Judgment	—
OS/263/2017	HARIMANIKYAM BALAJI RAO vs KOMMUGURI YESUPADAM	25 Feb 2019	Judgment	—
OS/51/2017	Nagisetty Jethendra Babu vs Thadiboina Vijaya Lakshmi	22 Feb 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/65/2018	BODDU SAI DURGA vs BODDU SAI KUMAR	21 Feb 2019	Order	—
SC/14/2019	The State Rep by SI of Police vs Jangam Yacob	20 Feb 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/2/2018	MURARI AMALESWARA RAO vs MURARI SIVAMRUTHA LAKSHMI GANDHI	20 Feb 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/100/2018	Murari Sivamrutha Lakshmi Gandhi vs Murari Amaleswara Rao	20 Feb 2019	Order	—
OS/38/2018	Chintha Srinivasa Rao vs Dirisam Balakotaiah	19 Feb 2019	Judgment	—
OS/346/2011	Parimi Subba Rao vs Parimi Ravi Kumar	18 Feb 2019	Order	—
OS/164/2018	METLA MOHANA KOTA NAGENDRA RAO vs REBBA KOTESWARAMMA and 3 OTHERS	15 Feb 2019	Judgment	—
OS/129/2017	POSINA VIJAYA RAMA RAJU vs PARASA SATYANARAYANA	14 Feb 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/177/2017	Esalvath Bhavani vs Gugulothu Kishan Naik	14 Feb 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/112/2018	Jogi Suma Priya vs NIL	12 Feb 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/111/2016	Tatikonda Kesava Rao vs TAtikonda Katyayani	11 Feb 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/150/2018	TANGELLAMUDI DURGA SAI KUMAR vs TENGELLAMUDI SANTHI	07 Feb 2019	Order	—
EP/105/2018	KARUMURI SITHAMAHALAKSHMI vs MATTE KISHORE	06 Feb 2019	Order	—
OS/27/2018	GUDAVALLI PAANDU alias PANDU RANGA RAO vs AREPALLI NANCHARAMMA	06 Feb 2019	Judgment	—
OS/80/2018	DUDALA GANDHI vs MIRIYALA LAKSHMI	05 Feb 2019	Other	—
H.M.O.P/108/2018	Rayapureddy Mahalakshmi vs NIL	05 Feb 2019	Order	—
OS/10/2018	Srirama Venkata Ramana vs Srirama Suneetha Devi	04 Feb 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/106/2018	Kutani Venkata Krishna Chandra Sekar vs NIL	01 Feb 2019	Order	—
OS/170/2017	CHALAVADI SUBRAHMANYAM vs BANDLA SRINIVASA RAO and ANOTHER	31 Jan 2019	Judgment	—
OS/246/2017	AYINAVALLI UMA MAHESWARI vs TADIBOINA VIJAYA LAKSHMI	30 Jan 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/146/2018	ANJALI PRANAYA KATRAGADDA @ ANJALI PRANAYA BASA vs NAVEEN KATRAGADDA	29 Jan 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/187/2018	NAVEEN KATRAGADDA vs ANJALI PRANAYA KATRAGADDA @ ANJALI PRANAYA BASA	29 Jan 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/184/2018	KASANI NAGA PADMA @ JANNU NAGA PADMA vs KASANI VEERA SATYANARAYANA	28 Jan 2019	Order	—
EP/44/2018	SINGARAJU VARA PRASAD vs KALIPATNAPU MURALI KRISHNA (DIED) AND 2 OTHERS	25 Jan 2019	Order	—
OS/101/2018	CANARA BANK vs PANNAMANENI NIKESH NAIDU and ANOTHER	25 Jan 2019	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/102/2018	Vinnakota Karthik vs NIL	25 Jan 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/98/2018	Kavali Amaleswara Rao vs NIL	23 Jan 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/142/2018	DEEVANA NAGALAKSHMI @ RAMA NAGALAKSHMI vs DEEVANA SRINIVASA RAO	22 Jan 2019	Order	—
H.M.O.P/164/2018	GARIKIPATI (RAMISETTI) SRI TEJA vs GARIKIPATI MADHUSUDHAN	04 Jan 2019	Order	—
OS/174/2018	MATTA ANJANEYA VARA PRASAD vs BEZAWADA RAJENDRA PRASAD	21 Dec 2018	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/136/2018	KONDAPALLI @ PINISETTI SRI DEVI vs KONDAPALLI VENKATA THRINADHA BHANU PRATHAP	21 Dec 2018	Order	—
OS/221/2012	Md.Jaibunnisa vs Md.Anwar	20 Dec 2018	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/39/2018	Medepalli Rajani vs Medepalli Kishore Kumar	18 Dec 2018	Judgment	—
L.A.O.P/78/2012	Land Acquisition Officer and R.D.O Bandar vs Koneru Naga Mani	17 Dec 2018	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/64/2018	PITCHUKA SAILAJA vs PERAKA SYAM SUNDER	14 Dec 2018	Judgment	—

Showing 100 of 842 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Apr 2019		28
Mar 2019		29
Feb 2019		26
Jan 2019		11
Dec 2018		12
Nov 2018		32
Oct 2018		32
Sep 2018		37
Aug 2018		36
Jul 2018		47
Jun 2018		39
May 2018		6

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Smt. B. Krishnaveni handled?

Smt. B. Krishnaveni has handled 849 court orders since 2017 at XI-ADJ Court Complex Gudivada. The average disposal rate is 54 orders per month.

What types of cases does Smt. B. Krishnaveni hear?

Based on available records, Smt. B. Krishnaveni primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Sessions Cases, Criminal Cases) at XI-ADJ Court Complex Gudivada.

Where is Smt. B. Krishnaveni currently posted?

Smt. B. Krishnaveni is posted as FAC-Principal Senior Civil Judge's Court,Gudivada at XI-ADJ Court Complex Gudivada, Krishna, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Smt. B. Krishnaveni available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Smt. B. Krishnaveni are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Smt. B. Krishnaveni dispose cases?

Smt. B. Krishnaveni disposes approximately 54 cases per month, based on 849 orders handled over their tenure at XI-ADJ Court Complex Gudivada.

Since when is Smt. B. Krishnaveni serving?

Smt. B. Krishnaveni has been serving at XI-ADJ Court Complex Gudivada since 2017.

Case Types

OS 48%

H 42%

EP 5%

SC 3%

IP 1%

S 1%

CC 0%

CMA 0%

Posting History

Jul 2018 — Aug 2018

FAC-Principal Senior Civil Judge's Court,Gudivada · 7 orders
Jul 2018 — Aug 2018

FAC-Addl Senior Civil Court(FTC) ,Gudivada
May 2017 — May 2019

Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam · 842 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Sri G.Subrahmanyam

XI Addl.District Judge Gudivada

1,232 orders

S.vasudev

Principal Senior Civil Judge's Court,Gudivada

381 orders

Smt P.Gayathri

Principal Junior Civil Judge ,Gudivada

215 orders

Ms. D.arundhati

Addl. Judicial I Class Magistrate, Gudivada

679 orders

← View all judges at XI-ADJ Court Complex Gudivada

Smt. B. Krishnaveni

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GUDIVADA.

O R D E R

Appendix of Evidence

Witness examined

Documents marked

PSCJ, MTM.

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GUDIVADA.

PSCJ,MTM

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

AT GUDIVADA

:: O R D E R ::

“Whether, the petitioner is entitled for dissolution of the marriage

Mutyala Swapna Priyanka performed on 06.03.2015 on the grounds of cruelty and

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Oral Evidence

Documentary Evidence

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

AT GUDIVADA

DECREE

Machilipatnam.

Gudivada.

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GUDIVADA

Present: Sri I.SRINIVASA MURTHY,

O R D E R

Appendix of Evidence

Witness examined

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GUDIVADA

Present: Sri I.SRINIVASA MURTHY,

Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 29 th day of August,

Memo of costs

IN THE COURT OF PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GUDIVADA.

PRESENT: SRI I. SRINIVASA MURTHY,

Prl.Senior Civil Judge, Gudivada.

Wednesday, this the 29 th day of August, 2018

O R D E R

Appendix of Evidence

Witness examined

Documents marked

GUDIVADA.

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GUDIVADA.

J U D G M E N T

Appendix of Evidence

Witness examined