Sri D.Ammanna Raja, M.A.,LL.M.,

1 // 2

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE: CHIRALA

Present: Sri S.Siva Sankar Reddy

Additional Junior Civil Judge, Chirala

This the 6th day of May, 2013

Crl.M.P. No.5079/2013

Between :

1.Kondaveeti Jansi Rani 2.Kondaveeti Jyothi… Petitioners

And

S.I of Police, Chirala II Town P.S.… Respondent

The case coming on today for hearing before me in the presence of Sri M.N.A.Prasad, Advocate for petitioner and having stood over for consideration till this day, the court delivered the following:

// O R D E R //

Heard the APP as well as counsel for the accused. Perused the material on record. The learned counsel for accused No.2 and 3 submitted that the alleged offence against A2 and A3 is under sec.498-A IPC., and Sec.3 and 4 of D.P.Act., and they have been in judicial custody from 03-05-2013. He further argued that A2 and A3 are innocents and they are falsely implicated in thi scase only because of the relationship with A1. He further argued thatA2 and A3 are being ladies entitled for benefits under explanation given to under Sec.437 Cr.P.c., and prays to release them on bail. On the other hand, the Learned A.P.P., opposed this petition and submitted that investigation is not yet completed and prays to dismiss the petition. On consideration of the arguments of both sides and material on record, reveals that A1 was already arrested and released on bail, A2 and A3 none other than the mother and sister of A1, further as rightly argued by the accused counsel, A2 and fA3 being ladies, they are entitled for the benefits as contemplated in explanation under section 437 Cr.P.c. Viewed from any angle putting

A2 and fA3 behind bars for further more period, it is nothing but infringement of their personal rights and liberty. In the facts and circumstances of the case as discussed above, I am inclined to allow this petition. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and A2

2 // 2

and A3 shall be released on their executing personal bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for the like sum each.

Pronounced by me in open court, this the 6 th day of May, 2013

Additional Junior Civil Judge

Chirala

1 // 1

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE: CHIRALA

Present: Sri M.A.Somasekhar

Additional Junior Civil Judge, Chirala

This the 3rd day of May, 2013

Crl.M.P. No.5080/2013

01.Marpu Prabhu Kumar aliad Kumar

02. Salagala Sarath Babu … petitioners

And

S.I of Police, Chirala I Town P.S.… Respondent

The case coming on today for hearing before me in the presence of Sri P.Sudhakara Rao, Advocate for petitioner and having stood over for consideration till this day, the court delivered the following:

// O R D E R //

Orders pronounced in open court. This petition is filed under Section 437 Cr.P.c.

praying this court to grant bail to the petitioners/A2 and A3. The petitioners counsel submitted that the practitioners are innocents and falsely implicated into this case and the practitioners are the only bread winner of their respective families and they are in judicial custody since from 02-05-2013, he further submitted that the petitioners are law abiding citizen, and ready to produce sufficient sureties for their due appearance.

Hence, prayed for grant of bail. The learning A.P.P. strongly opposed for bail. Perused case record. the petitioners are remanded to judicial custody on 02-05-2013. the investigation has been completed and C.S is being filed, the petitioners cannot be detained further. No prejudice is going to be caused to the prosecution, even if the petitioners are enlarged on bail. Since investigation is completed. Hence, I am inclined to grant bail. 1. They shall execute self bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for like sum each. 2. They shall appear before S.H.O. concerned on every Sunday in between10 and 12 noon for a period of 4 weeks. 3. They shall make available for investigation till the date of filing of charge sheet. Accordingly, this bail petition is allowed.

Pronounced by me in open court, this the 3 rd day of May, 2013.

Additional Junior Civil Judge

Chirala

1 // 1

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE :: CHIRALA

Present: Sri M.A.Somasekhar

Additional Junior Civil Judge, Chirala

This the 3rd day of May, 2013

C.C.311 of 2012

Between:

M/s. Shriram City Union finance Ltd., Chirala duly rep. By its authorized person G.Sivannarayana,

S/o madhusudana Rao, aged about 30 years,

Employee in complainant’s complany, R/o Chirala. … Complainant

And

Avugoti Ram Babu, r/o Srinivasa nagar, Hanjipalem, Chirala. … Accused

The case coming on today for hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Srinivasulu, Advocate for complainant and having stood over for consideration till this day, the court delivered the following:

// J U D G M E N T //

Complainant absent. Accused absent. No representation for both sides.Hence complaint is dismissed for default

Pronounced by me in open court, this the 3 rd day of May, 2013.

Additional Junior Civil Judge

Chirala

// APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE //

---NIL---

A.J.C.J, Chirala