Smt. D.varoodhini

H.M.O.P.No.32 of 2024 Page No.1 of 7

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE NARSAMPET

Present:- Smt. D.Varoodhini,

Senior Civil Judge,

Narsampet.

Friday, this the 17th day of October, 2025

H.M.O.P.No.32 OF 2024

Between:

Sampangi Renuka, W/o Ashok, Age : 35 yrs, Occ : Labour, R/o Manubothulagadda Village, Khanapur Mandal, Warangal District. … Petitioner

And

Sampangi Ashok, S/o Mallaiah, Age : 40 yrs, Occ : Labour, R/o Brahammamgari Gutta, Beside Government Hospital, Manugur Village and Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. … Respondent

This Petition having come before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri K.Ramesh, Advocate for petitioner and respondent remained exparte, upon perusing the entire material papers on record and the matter having been stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

:: O R D E R ::

This is a petition filed by the petitioner under Section 13(1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking dissolution of marriage between herself and the respondent held on 24.09.2009 on the ground of cruelty.

2.In brevity the averments of the petition are to the effect that : the marriage of petitioner and respondent was held about

SCJ Narsampet

H.M.O.P.No.32 of 2024 Page No.2 of 7

sixteen years ago at Manubothulagadda Village, Khanapur

Mandal, Warangal District as per Hindu rites and customs prevailing in their community. At the time of marriage, on demand of respondent and his family, parents of the petitioner presented cash of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only), one tula gold, apart from spending huge amounts towards marriage expenses. Post marriage, petitioner joined the conjugal society of respondent at Manugur Village. Their marriage was consummated and out of their wedlock, they are blessed with two female children namely, Preethi and Rakshitha who are aged 14 years and 12 years respectively.

2.(b). Petitioner further submits that post the birth of second daughter, respondent got addicted to alcohol and beat the petitioner indiscriminately in drunken state. He failed to provide maintenance and basic necessities to the petitioner and children. He suspected the fidelity of petitioner and verbally abused her in the presence of neighbours and villagers.

Although the petitioner tried to convince the respondent, regarding her chastity, he continued his harassment. He demanded petitioner to get money from her parents for his vices and when she failed to yield his demand, he harassed her mentally and physically.

2.(c). It is further submitted that in a panchayath held

before village elders, respondent admitted his guilt and

promised that he would lookafter the welfare of petitioner and children. Subsequently, both lead happy marital life for one month. Post one month of the panchayath, he again started

SCJ Narsampet

H.M.O.P.No.32 of 2024 Page No.3 of 7

harassing the petitioner and necked her out, however, with the intervention of elders, he took the petitioner into marital fold and this continued on several occasions. Ten years ago, respondent beat the petitioner indiscriminately and necked her out from his house. Eversince, petitioner and her daughters are residing at her parents place at Manubothulagadda Village,

Khanapur Mandal, Warangal District. While the matter stood thus, on 03.06.2024, respondent, Rapolu Babu, Rapolu Anitha,

Rapolu Bunny and Sampangi Raju criminally trespassed into the parental house of petitioner and abused her and her parents.

They also abused them physically and threatened them with dire consequences. Hence, she lodged a report with Police

Khanapur, whereafter, police registered a case in Cr.No.76/2024 for the offences, under sections 448, 290, 506 and 323 r/w 34

IPC. Though the petitioner and her parents tried to convince the respondent, to mend his ways, he did not respond to lead marital life with the petitioner. Respondent treated the petitioner with such cruelty, causing apprehension in the mind of petitioner that it would be harmful for her to live with him. There is no hope to the petitioner for leading conjugal life with the respondent and no possibility for their reunion. Hence, the petition.

3.Having received the notice, respondent failed to enter appearance, hence was set exparte and remained so all through the proceedings.

4.During the course of enquiry, petitioner filed her evidence affidavit in lieu of chief in examination and got marked Ex.P1.

SCJ Narsampet

H.M.O.P.No.32 of 2024 Page No.4 of 7

One V.Yellaiah is examined as PW2 to support the claim of the petitioner.

5.Heard learned counsel for petitioner and perused the material placed on record.

6.Now the point that emerges for consideration is

“Whether the petitioner is entitled for decree

of divorce as prayed for?”

7.FINDINGS : As stated earlier, petitioner got herself examined as PW1 and got marked Ex.P1 Marriage Invitation

Card, which proves her marriage with the respondent held about sixteen years ago at Manubothulagadda Village, Khanapur

Mandal, Mandal, Warangal District. As per her testimony, at the time of marriage, on demand of respondent and his family, parents of the petitioner presented cash of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only), one tula gold, apart from spending huge amounts towards marriage expenses. Post marriage, petitioner joined the conjugal society of respondent at Manugur

Village. Their marriage was consummated and out of their wedlock, they are blessed with two female children namely,

Preethi and Rakshitha who are aged 14 years and 12 years respectively.

8.PW1 further testifies that post the birth of second daughter, respondent got addicted to alcohol and beat the petitioner indiscriminately in drunken state. He failed to provide maintenance and basic necessities to the petitioner and

SCJ Narsampet

H.M.O.P.No.32 of 2024 Page No.5 of 7

children. He suspected the fidelity of petitioner and verbally abused her in the presence of neighbours and villagers. She further testifies that in a panchayath held before village elders, respondent admitted his guilt and promised that he would lookafter the petitioner and children properly. Subsequently, both lead happy marital life for one month. Post one month of the panchayath, he again started harassing the petitioner and necked her out, however, with the intervention of elders, he took the petitioner into marital fold and this continued on several occasions. Ten years ago, respondent beat the petitioner indiscriminately and necked her out from his house. Eversince, petitioner and her daughters are residing at her parents place at

Manubothulagadda Village, Khanapur Mandal, Warangal District.

PW1 further testifies that on 03.06.2024, respondent, Rapolu

Babu, Rapolu Anitha, Rapolu Bunny and Sampangi Raju criminally trespassed into her parental house and abusing her and her parents. They also abused them physically and threatened them with dire consequences. Hence, she lodged a report at Police Khanapur, whereafter, police registered a case in

Cr.No.76/2024 for the offences, under sections 448, 290, 506 and 323 r/w 34 IPC. Respondent treated the petitioner with such cruelty, causing apprehension in the mind of petitioner that it would be harmful for her to live with him. There is no hope to the petitioner for leading conjugal life with the respondent and no possibility for their reunion.

9.PW2 testified supporting the case of the petitioner. As per his testimony, petitioner is the wife of respondent and ten years ago, due to some disputes, respondent harassed the petitioner

SCJ Narsampet

H.M.O.P.No.32 of 2024 Page No.6 of 7

and necked her out from his house. He being one of the village elders, who attended the panchayath, testified that the panchayath elders, convinced the respondent to change his attitude and lead marital life with the petitioner. However, respondent failed to mend his ways. Petitioner suffered mental harassment in the hands of the respondent.

10.Conversely, a perusal of the record reflects that respondent remained exparte all through the proceedings. Petitioner/PW1 and PW2 adduced their evidence by way of filing evidence affidavits, however, respondent failed to cross examine them, hence, the contents of their affidavits remained unchallenged.

There is nothing patent on record to disprove or discard the evidence of PWs 1 and 2, hence, petitioner by way of documentary evidence under Ex.P1 proved the marriage between herself and the respondent and by way of her unrebutted ocular and documentary evidence, proved that respondent was instrumental in creating conjugal disruption and due to his attitude towards the petitioner, their marriage was irretrievably broken.

11.From the foregoing discussion, this Court opines that the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent is irretrievably broken and there is no hope of their reunion, thus, under compelled circumstances put forth by the petitioner, there is no option except to grant divorce as prayed by the petitioner by dissolving their marriage. Accordingly, point is answered.

SCJ Narsampet

H.M.O.P.No.32 of 2024 Page No.7 of 7

12.In the result, petition is allowed, granting decree of divorce with effect from 17.10.2025 by dissolving the marriage of petitioner and respondent, held on 24.09.2009. In the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs.

(Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 17th day of October, 2025)

Sd/-

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NARSAMPET.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Petitioner:

PW1 : Sampangi Renuka

PW2 : V.Yellaiah

For Respondent:

- None -

EXHIBITS MARKED

For Petitioner:

Ex.P1: Marriage Invitation Card.

For Respondent:

- Nil -

Sd/-

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NARSAMPET.

// True copy //

SCJ Narsampet

H.M.O.P.No.72 of 2024 Page 1 of 5

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT

NARSAMPET

Present:- Smt. D.Varoodhini,

Senior Civil Judge,

Narsampet.

Friday, this the 17th day of October, 2025

H.M.O.P.No.72 OF 2024

Between:

1. Nayakapu Vinod, S/o Sathyam, Age : 33 yrs, Occ : Private Employee, R/o Narsampet Municipality, Narsampet Mandal, Warangal District

2. Nayakapu @ Bollepally Narmada, Nayakapu Vinod, D/o Bollepally Raju Age : 29 yrs, Occ :Home Maker, R/o H.No.5-140, Near BSNL Tower, Narsampet Municipality, Narsampet Mandal, Warangal District … Petitioner No.1 and 2 AND

NIL … Respondent

This Petition having come before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri P.Ravi, Advocate for petitioners and upon perusing the entire material papers on record and the matter having been stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

:: O R D E R ::

This is a petition filed under Section 13(B) of the Hindu

Marriage Act, 1955 by both the parties seeking dissolution of their marriage, dated 07.03.2015 and for divorce by mutual consent.

SCJ Narsampet

H.M.O.P.No.72 of 2024 Page 2 of 5

2.In brevity of the averments of the petition are to the effect that : the marriage of the petitioners was held on 07.03.2015 at

Sathyam Function Hall, Mallampally Road, Narsampet, Warangal

District, as per the Hindu rites and customs. They lead marital life for a period of two years. They remained issueless.

Subsequently, due to the misunderstandings, which cropped up between them, they are living apart since seven years. Village and caste elders on both sides, tried to pacify the disputes between them but no purpose was served. Petitioners proclaimed that they cannot live marital life anymore and decided to obtain divorce by mutual consent, however, on certain terms and conditions. Hence, the petition.

3.Both the parties appeared before this Court and stated that they voluntarily agreed for divorce on mutual consent and the reconciliation efforts made by this Court failed. At request of both the petitioners, the matter was taken up for enquiry.

4.During the course of enquiry, both the parties filed their evidence affidavits in lieu of examination in chief and are examined as PW1 and PW2 and got marked Exs.P1 to P3.

5.Heard both the learned counsel and perused the material placed on record.

6.Now the point that emerges for consideration is

“Whether petitioners are entitled for decree

of divorce by mutual consent as prayed for?”

SCJ Narsampet

H.M.O.P.No.72 of 2024 Page 3 of 5

7.FINDINGS: As stated earlier, first petitioner got himself examined as PW1 and got marked Ex.P1 Marriage Invitation

Card, which proves their marriage held on 07.03.2015 at

Sathyam Function Hall, Mallampally Road, Narsampet, Warangal

District. Second petitioner got examined herself as PW2. As per their testimonies, post their marriage, differences cropped up between them, which lead to their separation. They further deposed that they are unable to live together as wife and husband in view of serious disputes between them and though a panchayath was held in the presence of elders, all their efforts to pacify the differences between them went futile. They further deposed that with the advice of elders and family members, they agreed for dissolution of their marriage by mutual consent on certain terms and conditions which are as under :

(i) That, the first petitioner agreed to pay an amount of

Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only) to the second petitioner towards permanent alimony including dowry amount and agreed to return the household articles to her.

(ii)That, the first petitioner paid an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only) to the second petitioner and agreed to pay the balance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only) at the time of taking divorce.

(iii)That, the second petitioner agreed not to claim any future claims against first petitioner in any manner.

(iv)That both the petitioners agreed to exchange their household articles, gold ornaments, presentations and other belongings presented at the time of their marriage.

(v) That, the petitioners shall appear before the Court un-

SCJ Narsampet

H.M.O.P.No.72 of 2024 Page 4 of 5

conditionally at the time of first hearing and on all the dates, whenever, their presence is required.

(vi) That, the petitioners shall have no right whatsoever against each other and their properties and the rights derived on account of their marriage are hereby relinquished.

(v)That, the second petitioner shall not have any right or interest over the person and properties of first petitioner and she is not entitled to claim any right in future.

(vi)Both the petitioners are at liberty to re-marry of their own choice.

8. A perusal of the evidence adduced by both the parties establishes their marriage. Even as per the terms and conditions as agreed by them, their marital tie is irretrievably broken and there is no scope for reunion. Further they have been living apart, as they have not been able to live together. Hence, they have mutually agreed that their marriage should be dissolved by way of decree of divorce. This Court is satisfied that both the parties consented for dissolution of their marriage on their own volition and it appears that their consent to the petition is free.

From the foregoing discussion, this Court opines that the petitioners are entitled for divorce as prayed for. Accordingly, point is answered.

9.In the result, the petition is allowed, granting decree of divorce by mutual consent with effect from 17.10.2025, by dissolving the marriage of the petitioners held on 07.03.2015.

However, it is made clear that both the petitioners shall not claim any right on person or property of each other in future as

SCJ Narsampet

H.M.O.P.No.72 of 2024 Page 5 of 5

agreed by them.

In the circumstances of the case, parties shall bear their own costs.

(Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this the 17th day of October, 2025)

Sd/-

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NARSAMPET.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Petitioner:

PW1 : Nayakapu Vinod,

PW2 : Nayakapu Narmada

For Respondent:

- None -

EXHIBITS MARKED

For Petitioner:

Ex.P1: Marriage Invitation Card,

Ex.P2: Attested photocopy of Aadhar Card of First Petitioner (Compared with the original)

Ex.P3: Attested photocopy of Aadhar Card of Second Petitioner (Compared with the original)

For Respondent:

- Nil -

Sd/-

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NARSAMPET.

// True copy //

SCJ Narsampet

H.M.O.P.No.10 of 2025 Page 1 of 5

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT

NARSAMPET

Present:- Smt. D.Varoodhini,

Senior Civil Judge,

Narsampet.

Tuesday, this the 04th day of November, 2025

H.M.O.P.No.10 OF 2025

Between:

1. Banothu Vishnu, S/o Swamy, Age : 32 yrs, Occ : Private Job, R/o H.No.1-156, Appalraopet Village, Nekkonda Mandal, Warangal District.

2. Banothu @ Daravath Vanitha, W/o Banothu Vishnu, D/o Daravath Siri, Age : 29 yrs, Occ : Home Maker, R/o H.No.3-83, Laxmipuram Thanda, Edulapusapalle Village, Mahabubabad Mandal and District. … Petitioners AND

NIL … Respondent

This Petition having come before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri K.Ramesh, Advocate for petitioners and upon perusing the entire material papers on record and the matter having been stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

:: O R D E R ::

This is a petition filed under Section 13(B) of the Hindu

Marriage Act, 1955 by both the parties seeking dissolution of their marriage, dated 20.02.2022 and for divorce by mutual consent.

SCJ Narsampet

H.M.O.P.No.10 of 2025 Page 2 of 5

2.In brevity of the averments of the petition are to the effect that : the marriage of the petitioners was held on 20.02.2022 at the house of second petitioner at Laxmipuram Village,

Mahabubabad Mandal and District, as per Hindu rites and customs. Second petitioner joined the conjugal society of first petitioner at Appalraopet Village, Nekkonda Mandal, Warangal

District. Their marriage was consummated but they remained issueless. Subsequently, due to misunderstandings, which cropped up between them, leading to marital break down irrevocably and are living apart. Their family members, village and caste elders on both sides, tried to pacify the disputes between them but in vain. They expressed their intention before the family members and elders that they cannot lead marital life anymore and decided to obtain divorce by mutual consent, however, on certain terms and conditions. The terms were reduced to writing on 28.12.2024. As per the terms, second petitioner has no right to claim maintenance, money or residence or any other movable and immovable properties from the first petitioner in any manner, whatsoever. They exchanged articles which were presented to them during marriage. Both the parties agreed that they will not file any civil or criminal cases against each other or family members in any Court of Law.

Further, first petitioner agreed to present an amount of

Rs.18,00,000/- to the second petitioner. Hence, the petition.

3.Both the parties appeared before this Court and stated that they voluntarily agreed for divorce on mutual consent. The reconciliation efforts made by this Court failed. At request of both the petitioners, the matter was taken up for enquiry.

SCJ Narsampet

H.M.O.P.No.10 of 2025 Page 3 of 5

4.During the course of enquiry, both the parties filed their evidence affidavits in lieu of examination in chief and are examined as PW1 and PW2 and got marked Exs.P1 to P3.

5.Heard the learned counsel and perused the material placed on record.

6.Now the point that emerges for consideration is

“Whether petitioners are entitled for decree

of divorce by mutual consent as prayed for?”

7.FINDINGS: As stated earlier, first petitioner got himself examined as PW1 and got marked Ex.P1 Marriage Wedding Card, which proves their marriage held on 20.02.2022 at Laxmipuram

Village, Mahabubabad Mandal and District, as per Hindu rites and customs. Second petitioner joined the conjugal society of first petitioner at Appalraopet Village, Nekkonda Mandal,

Warangal District. Their marriage was consummated but they remained issueless. PW1 further testified that due to misunderstandings, which cropped up, they are living apart.

They expressed their intention before the family members and elders that they cannot lead marital life anymore and decided to obtain divorce by mutual consent. He further testified that the terms were reduced to writing on divorce deed on 28.12.2024.

As per the terms, second petitioner has no right to claim maintenance, money or residence or any other movable and immovable properties from the first petitioner in any manner, whatsoever. They exchanged articles which were presented to them during marriage. Further, PW1 agreed to present an amount of Rs.18,00,000/- to PW2. PW2 also testified on similar

SCJ Narsampet

H.M.O.P.No.10 of 2025 Page 4 of 5

lines with the evidence of PW1.

8. A perusal of the evidence adduced by both establishes their marriage. Even as per the terms and conditions agreed by them, their marital tie is irretrievably broken and there is no scope for reunion. Further they have been living apart, as they have not been able to live together. Hence, they have mutually agreed that their marriage should be dissolved by way of decree of divorce. This Court is satisfied that both the parties consented for dissolution of their marriage on their own volition and it appears that their consent to the petition is free. From the foregoing discussion, this Court opines that the petitioners are entitled for divorce as prayed for. Accordingly, point is answered.

9.In the result, the petition is allowed, granting decree of divorce by mutual consent with effect from 04.11.2025, by dissolving the marriage of the petitioners held on 20.02.2022.

However, it is made clear that both the petitioners shall not claim any right on person or property of each other in future as agreed by them. In the circumstances of the case, parties shall bear their own costs.

(Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this the 04th day of November, 2025)

Sd/-

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NARSAMPET.

SCJ Narsampet

H.M.O.P.No.10 of 2025 Page 5 of 5

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Petitioner:

PW1 : Banoth Vishnu

PW2 : Daravath Vanitha

For Respondent:

- None -

EXHIBITS MARKED

For Petitioner:

Ex.P1: Marriage Wedding Card

Ex.P2: Attested photocopy of Aadhar Card of First Petitioner (Compared with the original)

Ex.P3: Attested photocopy of Aadhar Card of Second Petitioner (Compared with the original)

For Respondent:

- Nil -

Sd/-

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NARSAMPET.

// True copy //

SCJ Narsampet

H.M.O.P.No.25 of 2025 Page No.1 of 5

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE NARSAMPET

Present:- Smt. D.Varoodhini,

Senior Civil Judge,

Narsampet.

Thursday, this the 16th day of October, 2025

H.M.O.P.No.25 OF 2025

Between:

Gugulothu Anupa, W/o Mahender, Age : 29 yrs, Occ : Home Maker, R/o H.No.2-25/2, Dharamraopet Village, Khanapur Mandal, Warangal District … Petitioner

And

Gugulothu Mahender, S/o Mangya, Age : 30 yrs, Occ : Private Job, R/o H.No.6-196, Chapagani Thanda, Katkur Vilage, Akkannapet Mandal, Siddipet District.

… Respondent

This Petition is coming before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri K.Veeresh, Advocate for petitioner and respondent remained exparte, upon perusing the entire material papers on record and the matter having been stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

:: O R D E R ::

This is a petition filed by the petitioner under Section 13(1)(ia) (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking dissolution of marriage between herself and the respondent held on 11.06.2015 on the grounds of cruelty and desertion.

2.In brevity the averments of the petition are to the effect that :

the marriage of petitioner and respondent was held on 11.06.2015 at

Dharmaraopet Village, Khanapur Mandal, Warangal District as per

SCJ Narsampet

H.M.O.P.No.25 of 2025 Page No.2 of 5

Hindu rites and customs. At the time of marriage, parents of the petitioner presented an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs only), 3-tulas of gold and other Household articles worth of

Rs.50,000/- as dowry to the respondent on their demand. Post marriage, petitioner joined the conjugal society of respondent and they lead happy marital life for sometime. Their marriage was consummated. They are blessed with one daughter namely

G.Aadhya, aged 7 years.

2.(b). Petitioner further submits that soon after the marriage, respondent started verbally abusing her and physically abused her in front of her friends and family members. Respondent and his family members harassed her demanding additional dowry, though, petitioner suggested several times that her parents have no financial capacity to present additional dowry. He used to come home late nights in drunken state and beat her indiscriminately. Petitioner filed

M.C.No.32 of 2024 against respondent seeking maintenance, which is

pending for adjudication on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Narsampet. In a panchayath, the elders, advised the respondent to lookafter the petitioner properly but the respondent failed to mend his attitude and continued his harassment towards her. On 14.04.2019 he necked out the petitioner and child from his house and left them to their fate. All her efforts for their re-union went futile. Respondent proclaimed that he would eliminate the petitioner at anytime. That, the respondent never maintained harmonious and cordial relationship with the petitioner and their marriage is irretrievably broken. Hence, the petition.

SCJ Narsampet

H.M.O.P.No.25 of 2025 Page No.3 of 5

3.Having received the notice, respondent failed to enter appearance, hence was set exparte and remained so all through the proceedings.

4.During the course of enquiry, petitioner filed her evidence affidavit in lieu of chief in examination and got marked Exs.P1 and P2.

5.Heard learned counsel for petitioner and perused the material placed on record.

6.Now the point that emerges for consideration is

“Whether the petitioner is entitled for decree of

divorce as prayed for?”

7.FINDINGS : As stated earlier, petitioner got herself examined as PW1 and got marked Ex.P1 Marriage Wedding Card, which proves her marriage with the respondent held on 11.06.2015 at

Dharmaraopet Village, Khanapur Mandal, Warangal District. As per her testimony, at the time of marriage, her parents presented an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs only), 3-tulas of gold and other Household articles worth of Rs.50,000/- as dowry to the respondent on their demand. Post marriage, she joined the conjugal society of respondent and they lead happy marital life for sometime.

PW1 further testified that soon after the marriage, respondent started harassing her verbally and physically. He used to come home late nights in drunken state and beat her indiscriminately. In a panchayath, the elders, advised the respondent to lookafter the petitioner properly but the respondent failed to mend his attitude and continued his harassment towards her, finally, on 14.04.2019 respondent necked her and the child from his house.

SCJ Narsampet

H.M.O.P.No.25 of 2025 Page No.4 of 5

8.Respondent remained exparte all through the proceedings.

Petitioner adduced her evidence by way of filing evidence affidavit, however, respondent failed to rebut her evidence, hence, the contents of her affidavit remained unchallenged. There is nothing patent on record to disprove or discard the evidence of PW1, hence, petitioner by way of documentary evidence under Ex.P1 proved the marriage between herself and the respondent and by way of her unrebutted ocular and documentary evidence, proved that respondent was instrumental in creating conjugal disruption and due to his attitude towards the petitioner, their marriage was irretrievably broken.

9.From the foregoing discussion, this Court opines that the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent is irretrievably broken and there is no hope of their reunion, thus, under compelled circumstances put forth by the petitioner, there is no option except to grant divorce as prayed by the petitioner by dissolving their marriage.

Accordingly, point is answered.

10.In the result, petition is allowed, granting decree of divorce with effect from 16.10.2025 by dissolving the marriage of petitioner and respondent, held on 11.06.2015. In the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs.

(Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 16th day of October,

2025)

Sd/-

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NARSAMPET.

SCJ Narsampet

H.M.O.P.No.25 of 2025 Page No.5 of 5

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Petitioner:

PW1 : G.Anupa

For Respondent:

- None -

EXHIBITS MARKED

For Petitioner:

Ex.P1: Marriage Invitation Card. Ex.P2: Attested photocopy of Aadhar Card of petitioner (Compared with the original)

For Respondent:

- Nil -

Sd/-

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NARSAMPET.

// True copy //

SCJ Narsampet

E.P.No.256 of 2017 Page 1 of 3

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT NARSAMPET

Present:- Smt. D.Varoodhini,

Senior Civil Judge,

Narsampet.

Friday, this the 07th day of November, 2025

E.P.No.256 OF 2017

Between:

Siluveru Ravinder, S/o Krishnamurthy, Age : 40 yrs, Occ : Pvt. Employee, R/o Narsampet Village and Mandal, Warangal District. …Decree Holder AND

1. Gaujula Shiva Kumar, S/o Late Sadanandam, Age : 45 yrs, Occ : Self Employment, R/o Narsampet

2. Gaujula Hari Kumar, S/o Late Sadananadam, Age : 40 yrs, Occ : Self Employment, R/o Narsampet.

3. Gaujual Sarojini, W/o Late Sadanandam (Died per LRS)

4. Gangula @ Gajula Saraswati, D/o Late Sadanandam, W/o Sadanandam, Age : 51 yrs, Occ : Home Maker, R/o Flat No.402, Asopalav Co-operative Society Ltd., Thane District, Maharashtra.

5. Katabathini @ Gajula Mahalaxmi, D/o Late Sadanandam, W/o Late Srinivas, Age : 50 yrs, Occ : Home Maker, R/o Laxmi Apartments, 1st Floor, Bhiwandi, Thane District, Maharashtra State,

6. Bandari @ Gajula Dhanalaxmi, D/o Late Sadanandam, W/o Ram Tilak, Age : 44 yrs, Occ : Home Maker, R/o H.No.16-10-719, Shivanagar, Warangal.

7. Gajula Sathish Kumar, S/o Late Sadanandam, Age: 34 yrs, Occ : Private Employee, R/o H.No.11-3-382, Second Floor, Srinivasanagar

E.P.No.256 of 2017 Page 2 of 3

Colony, Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad. (J.Dr.Nos.4 to 7 added as LRs of J.Dr.No.3 vide Orders in E.A.No.07/2022, dated 05.12.2022) … Judgment Debtors

This Petition having come before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri A.Veerabhadraiah, Advocate for Decree Holder and of Sri M.Ramchander, Advocate for Judgment Debtors and upon perusing the entire material papers on record and the matter having been stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

:: O R D E R ::

Decree Holder filed Execution Petition seeking attachment of

E.P.Schedule Property of Judgment Debtor Nos.1 to 3 (J.Dr.No.3 died per LRs) and upon attachment, for auction and sale, for realization of decreetal amount of Rs.2,68,554/- (Rupees Two

Lakhs Sixty Eight Thousand Five Hundred and Fifty Four only).

2.It is submitted that Decree Holder obtained decree in

O.S.No.27 of 2009, dated 10.03.2011 for an amount of

Rs.2,68,554/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Sixty Eight Thousand Five

Hundred and Fifty Four only) (as on 22.03.2017 with interest and costs). The Execution Petition filed for attachment of property belonging to J.Drs.1 to 3. J.Dr.No.3 died during the pendency of proceedings and his LRs/J.Drs 4 to 7 are brought on record vide

Orders in E.A.No.07/2022, dated 05.12.2022.

3.Judgment Debtor Nos. 1 to 7 remained exparte and attachment of E.P.Schedule property was ordered. However, during proceedings, both the parties reported settlement out of Court. On 22.10.2024, J.Drs deposited the decreetal amount to the credit of the E.P. At this stage, full satisfaction memo is filed by the Decree

Holder seeking withdrawal of the said amount. D.Hr was granted

E.P.No.256 of 2017 Page 3 of 3

permission vide Orders in E.A.No.10 of 2025, dated 25.09.2025 and online Account Payee Cheque No.2601560722 for an amount of

Rs.2,68,554/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Sixty Eight Thousand Five

Hundred and Fifty Four only) was ordered to be issued.

4.In view of the fact that the decreetal claim of Decree Holder has been satisfied and Full Satisfaction Memo filed, which is recorded, the present Execution Petition is required to be terminated.

5.In the result, E.P. is terminated.

(Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this the 07th day of November, 2025)

Sd/-

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NARSAMPET.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Decree Holder:

-None-

For Judgment Debtors:

- None -

EXHIBITS MARKED

For Decree Holder:

-Nil-

For Judgment Debtors:

- Nil -

Sd/-

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NARSAMPET.

// True copy //