Currently Serving

Dundhigalla Sadhana

VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, RangaReddy District at L.B.Nagar

Rangareddy, PDJ Court Complex · Rangareddy · Telangana

Based on 19 recent orders

DUNDHIGALLA SADHANA, VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, RangaReddy District at L.B.Nagar, is posted at Rangareddy, PDJ Court Complex, Rangareddy, Telangana, India. 19 court orders on record since 2026. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CRLMP cases.

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

CRLMP.BAIL/642/2026

MOHAMMED NISAR AHMED PATEL (A6) vs THE STATE OF TG THROUGH PS LB NAGAR

02 May 2026

IN THE COURT OF THE VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, AT L.B. NAGAR

PRESENT: SMT D.SADHANA,

VIII ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, L.B.NAGAR

SATURDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MAY, 2026

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.642 OF 2026 IN CRIME NO.432 OF 2026 OF POLICE STATION, L.B.NAGAR

Between:

Mohammed Nisar Ahmed Patel, S/o. Afeefuddin, Aged 62 years, Occ: Daily wager, R/o. H.No.8-2-602/29, Banjara Hills, Zaheeranagar, Road NO.10, Telangana 500034. N/o. Suraram village, Sadashivapet, Sanga Reddy District.

...Petitioner/Accused No.6

A N D

The State of Telangana through P.S. L.B.Nagar.

....Respondent/Complainant

Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS

This petition is coming before me on 01-05-2026 for hearing in the presence of Sri Md.Shafiq Patel, Advocate for the Petitioner/Accused No.6 and Smt.B. Padmaja Reddy, Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the State, upon hearing both sides, upon perusing the material papers on record and the matter having stood over for consideration to this day, this Court made the following:

2 :: ORDER ::

1.This is the second bail petition filed by the Petitioner/Accused No.6 under Section 483 of B.N.S.S seeking bail in Crime No.432 of 2026 of

L.B.Nagar Police Station for the offences under Section 310(2), 331(4), 311 of BNS, 2023.

2.The brief facts of the Prosecution case are that on 29-03-2026 at 14-30 hours, the complainant by name Ravi Rajasekhar Naidu lodged a complaint stating that on the same day at 6-00 hours, he came out side his house and found his night shift watchman by name Suresh kumar stood trembling and on enquiry the watchman revealed that at 1-40 hours unidentified individual scaled the wall, held knife at his neck and threatened with dire consequences, took his phone and ordered him to open the gate. Some other unidentified individuals entered into the premises and directly proceeded to second floor and after some time returned and stated to him “kuch nai re” and fled away from the spot.

Later the watchman went to inspect the second floor and discovered some lemons lying there and got terrified. The complainant further stated earlier two times also the similar incidents had occurred.

3.The learned counsel for the Petitioner/ Accused No.6 submitted that the petitioner/A.6 is innocent and not connected with the alleged offence. The entire case is built upon a false tip regarding black money and based on hearsay and voluntary confessions made during police custody. There is no recovery of stolen property. In this case the entire investigation is completed except filing of formal charge sheet.

Petitioner/Accused No.6 is ready to furnish sufficient sureties as ordered 3 by the Court for his release on bail. Hence prayed to enlarge the

Petitioner/Accused No.6 on bail.

4. Notice is given to the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and she filed counter submitting that the case is under investigation for arrest of

A.5, A.11 to A.13 and no property is seized from the petitioner/ A.6.

Hence prayed to dismiss the petition.

5. Heard both sides.

6. Perused the record.

7. Now the point for consideration is :

Whether the Petitioner/Accused No.6 is entitled to be enlarged on bail as prayed for?

POINT:

8. The allegations against the Petitioner/Accused No.6 is that he along with other accused persons assembled and made preparation for committing dacoity by lurking house trespass by night.

9. Though the Counsel for the Petitioner/Accused No.6 has submitted that the petitioner/A.6 is innocent and not connected with the alleged offence. The entire case is built upon a false tip regarding black money and based on hearsay and voluntary confessions made during police custody, all these are the subject matters to be decided during the 4 course of trial. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the case is pending for arrest of A.5, A.11 to A.13 and no property is seized from the petitioner/ A.6 except mobile phone.

10. Considering the facts and circumstances and perusal of the record shows that the material part of investigation is completed, hence this

Court does not see any reason to detain the Petitioner/Accused No.6 in jail any further and, therefore, this Court is inclined to enlarge the

Petitioner/Accused No.6 on bail, however with certain condition.

11. In the result, the petition is allowed and the Petitioner/Accused

No.6 is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his executing a Personal Bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties for like sum each to the satisfaction of the II Addl. Junior Civil

Judge – cum - II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, at L.B.Nagar and

on further condition that he shall appear before the Station House

Officer, Police Station, L.B.Nagar on every Saturday in between 10.00 A.M and 12.00 P.M for a period of two months from the date of his release on bail or till the filing of the Charge Sheet, whichever is earlier.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 2nd day of May, 2026.

VIII Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B.Nagar Copies to :

1. The II AJCJ- cum- II AJMFC, at L.B.Nagar.

2. The SHO P.S. L.B.Nagar

3. The Learned Counsel for Petitioner/accused No.6 (on payment of usual charges).

CRLMP.BAIL/639/2026

MOHD AZEEM UDDIN S/O LATE MOHD FAQRUDDIN vs THE STATE OF TELANGANA,THROUGH PS LB NAGAR

02 May 2026

IN THE COURT OF THE VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, AT L.B. NAGAR

PRESENT: SMT D.SADHANA,

VIII ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, L.B.NAGAR

SATURDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MAY, 2026

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.639 OF 2026 IN CRIME NO.432 OF 2026 OF POLICE STATION, L.B.NAGAR

Between:

Mohd. Azeem Uddin, S/o. Late Mohd. Faqruddin, Aged 60 years, occ: Iron Business, R/o. H.No.1-4-848/1, Bakaram, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.

...Petitioner/Accused No.7

A N D

The State of Telangana through P.S. L.B.Nagar.

....Respondent/Complainant

Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS

This petition is coming before me on 01-05-2026 for hearing in the presence of Sri Syed Noor Mohammed, Advocate for the Petitioner/Accused No.7 and Smt. B.Padmaja Reddy, Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the State, upon hearing both sides, upon perusing the material papers on record and the matter having stood over for consideration to this day, this Court made the following:

2 :: ORDER ::

1.This is the second bail petition filed by the Petitioner/Accused No.7 under Section 483 of B.N.S.S seeking bail in Crime No.432 of 2026 of

L.B.Nagar Police Station for the offences under Section 310(2), 331(4), 311 of BNS, 2023.

Later the watchman went to inspect the second floor and discovered some lemons lying there and got terrified. The complainant further stated earlier two times also the similar incidents had occurred.

3.The learned counsel for the Petitioner/Accused No.7 submitted that the petitioner / A.7 falsely implicated and not connected with the alleged offence. He is a senior citizen and sole bread winner of his family and if he is continued in detention, severe hardship would be caused to his family members. In this case the investigation is substantially completed and material witnesses are examined. Petitioner/Accused No.7 is ready 3 to furnish sufficient sureties as ordered by the Court for his release on bail. Hence prayed to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.7 on bail.

4. Notice is given to the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and she filed counter submitting that the case is under investigation for arrest of

A.5, A.11 to A.13 and no property is seized from the petitioner/A.7 except cell phone. Hence prayed to dismiss the petition.

5. Heard both sides.

6. Perused the record.

7. Now the point for consideration is :

Whether the Petitioner/Accused No.7 is entitled to be enlarged on bail as prayed for?

POINT:

8. The allegations against the Petitioner/Accused No.7 is that he along with other accused persons assembled and made preparation for committing dacoity by lurking house trespass by night.

9. Though the Counsel for the Petitioner/Accused No.7 has submitted that he is noway connected and falsely implicated in the alleged offence, all these are the subject matters to be decided during the course of trial.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the case is 4 pending for arrest of A.5, A.11 to A.13 and stating that no property was recovered or seized from petitioner/A.7 except cell phone.

10. Considering the facts and circumstances and perusal of the record shows that the material part of investigation is completed, hence this

Court does not see any reason to detain the Petitioner/Accused No.7 in jail any further and, therefore, this Court is inclined to enlarge the

Petitioner/Accused No.7 on bail, however with certain condition.

11. In the result, the petition is allowed and the Petitioner/Accused

No.7 is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his executing a Personal Bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties for like sum each to the satisfaction of the II Addl. Junior Civil

Judge – cum - II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, at L.B.Nagar and

on further condition that he shall appear before the Station House

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 2nd day of May, 2026.

VIII Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B.Nagar

Copies to :

1. The II AJCJ- cum- II AJMFC, at L.B.Nagar.

2. The SHO P.S. L.B.Nagar

3. The Learned Counsel for Petitioner/accused No.7 (on payment of usual charges).

CRLMP.BAIL/636/2026

MADISETTY AMARENDER KUMAR S/O PENTAIAH vs STATION HOUSE OFFICER,PS LB NAGAR,MALKAJGIRI COMMISSIONERATE

02 May 2026

IN THE COURT OF THE VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, AT L.B. NAGAR

PRESENT: SMT D.SADHANA,

VIII ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, L.B.NAGAR

SATURDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MAY, 2026

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.636 OF 2026 IN CRIME NO.432 OF 2026 OF POLICE STATION, L.B.NAGAR

Between:

Madisetty Amarender Kumar, S/o. Pentaiah, Aged 42 years, Occ: Live Orchestra Sound Operator, R/o. Plot No.12-10-294, J.B. Apartments, G-1, Ramalayam street, Sitaphalmandi, Secunderabad, T.S.

...Petitioner/Accused No.3

A N D

The State of Telangana through P.S. L.B.Nagar.

....Respondent/Complainant

Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS

This petition is coming before me on 01-05-2026 for hearing in the presence of M/s. Y.Hema Chander, Advocate for the Petitioner/Accused No.3 and Smt. B.Padmaja Reddy, Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the State, upon hearing both sides, upon perusing the material papers on record and the matter having stood over for consideration to this day, this Court made the following:

2 :: ORDER ::

1.This is the second bail petition filed by the Petitioner/Accused No.3 under Section 483 of B.N.S.S seeking bail in Crime No.432 of 2026 of

L.B.Nagar Police Station for the offences under Section 310(2), 331(4), 311 of BNS, 2023.

Later the watchman went to inspect the second floor and discovered some lemons lying there and got terrified. The complainant further stated earlier two times also the similar incidents had occurred.

3.The learned counsel for the Petitioner/Accused No.3 submitted that there is no loss of any valuable items of the complainant and no property is seized from petitioner/A.3. It is further submit that the remand report clearly reveals that the petitioner/ A.3 did not enter into the premises.

Petitioner/Accused No.3 is ready to furnish sufficient sureties as ordered by the Court for his release on bail. Hence prayed to enlarge the

Petitioner/Accused No.3 on bail.

4. Notice is given to the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and she filed counter submitting that the case is under investigation for arrest of

A.5, A.11 to A.13 and there is no seizure of property from petitioner/

A.3. Hence prayed to dismiss the petition.

5. Heard both sides.

6. Perused the record.

7. Now the point for consideration is :

Whether the Petitioner/Accused No.3 is entitled to be enlarged on bail as prayed for?

POINT:

8. The allegations against the Petitioner/Accused No.3 is that he along with other accused persons assembled and made preparation for committing dacoity by lurking house trespass by night.

9. Though the Counsel for the Petitioner/Accused No.3 has submitted that there is no loss of any valuable items of the complainant and no property is seized from petitioner/A.3, all these are the subject matters to be decided during the course of trial. The learned Additional Public

Prosecutor submitted that the case is pending for arrest of A.5, A.11 to

A.13 and no property is seized from petitioner/ A.3.

10. Considering the facts and circumstances and perusal of the record shows that the material part of investigation is completed, hence this

Court does not see any reason to detain the Petitioner/Accused No.3 in jail any further and, therefore, this Court is inclined to enlarge the

Petitioner/Accused No.3 on bail, however with certain condition.

11. In the result, the petition is allowed and the Petitioner/Accused

No.3 is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his executing a Personal Bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties for like sum each to the satisfaction of the II Addl. Junior Civil

Judge – cum - II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, at L.B.Nagar and

on further condition that he shall appear before the Station House

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 2nd day of May, 2026.

VIII Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B.Nagar

Copies to :

1. The II AJCJ- cum- II AJMFC, at L.B.Nagar.

2. The SHO P.S. L.B.Nagar

3. The Learned Counsel for Petitioner/accused No.3 (on payment of usual charges).

CRLMP.BAIL/637/2026

MOHAMMED AHMED NADEEM SOHAIL S/O MA NASEER vs THE STATE OF TELANGANA THROUGH PS LB NAGAR

02 May 2026

IN THE COURT OF THE VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, AT L.B. NAGAR

PRESENT: SMT D.SADHANA,

VIII ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, L.B.NAGAR

SATURDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MAY, 2026

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.637 OF 2026 IN CRIME NO.432 OF 2026 OF POLICE STATION, L.B.NAGAR

Between:

Mohammed Ahmed Nadeem Sohail, S/o. MA Naseer, Aged 30 years, Occ: Kirana shop, Caste : Muslim, R/o. 10-449/2/1, PVN colony, Malkajgiri.

...Petitioner/Accused No.8

A N D

The State of Telangana through P.S. L.B.Nagar.

....Respondent/Complainant

Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS

This petition is coming before me on 01-05-2026 for hearing in the presence of Sri P.Ram Mohan, Advocate for the Petitioner/Accused No.8 and Smt. B.Padmaja Reddy, Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the State, upon hearing both sides, upon perusing the material papers on record and the matter having stood over for consideration to this day, this Court made the following:

2 :: ORDER ::

1.This is the second bail petition filed by the Petitioner/Accused No.8 under Section 483 of B.N.S.S seeking bail in Crime No.432 of 2026 of

L.B.Nagar Police Station for the offences under Section 310(2), 331(4), 311 of BNS, 2023.

Later the watchman went to inspect the second floor and discovered some lemons lying there and got terrified. The complainant further stated earlier two times also the similar incidents had occured.

3.The learned counsel for the Petitioner/Accused No.8 submitted that the allegations of the prosecution are all false, baseless and made only to implicate the petitioner/ A.8 who is nowhere connected to the alleged offence. The petitioner is a disable person with 75% blindness and filed copy of disability certificate. Petitioner/Accused No.8 is ready to furnish sufficient sureties as ordered by the Court for his release on bail. Hence prayed to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.8 on bail.

4. Notice is given to the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and she filed counter submitting that the case is under investigation for arrest of

A.5, A.11 to A.13 and there is no seizure of property from petitioner/ A.8 except cell phone. Hence prayed to dismiss the petition.

5. Heard both sides.

6. Perused the record.

7. Now the point for consideration is :

Whether the Petitioner/Accused No.8 is entitled to be enlarged on bail as prayed for?

POINT:

8. The allegations against the Petitioner/Accused No.8 is that he along with other accused persons assembled and made preparation for committing dacoity by lurking house trespass by night.

9. Though the Counsel for the Petitioner/Accused No.8 has submitted that the petitioner/ A.8 is a disabled person with 75% blindness and falsely implicated in the present crime, all these are the subject matters to be decided during the course of trial. The learned Additional Public

Prosecutor submitted that the case is pending for arrest of A.5, A.11 to

A.13 and stated that no property was recovered or seized from petitioner/A.8 except cell phone.

10. Considering the facts and circumstances and perusal of the record shows that the material part of investigation is completed, hence this

Court does not see any reason to detain the Petitioner/Accused No.8 in jail any further and, therefore, this Court is inclined to enlarge the

Petitioner/Accused No.8 on bail, however with certain condition.

11. In the result, the petition is allowed and the Petitioner/Accused

No.8 is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his executing a Personal Bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties for like sum each to the satisfaction of the II Addl. Junior Civil

Judge – cum - II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, at L.B.Nagar and

on further condition that he shall appear before the Station House

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 2nd day of May, 2026.

VIII Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B.Nagar

Copies to :

1. The II AJCJ- cum- II AJMFC, at L.B.Nagar.

2. The SHO P.S. L.B.Nagar

3. The Learned Counsel for Petitioner/accused No.8 (on payment of usual charges).

CRLMP.BAIL/640/2026

MIR YOUNUS ALI ALIAS PARVEZ S/O MIR HYDER ALI vs STATE OF TELANGANA THROUGH PS LB NAGAR

02 May 2026

IN THE COURT OF THE VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, AT L.B. NAGAR

PRESENT: SMT D.SADHANA,

VIII ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, L.B.NAGAR

SATURDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MAY, 2026

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.640 OF 2026 IN CRIME NO.432 OF 2026 OF POLICE STATION, L.B.NAGAR

Between:

Mir Younus Ali alias Parvez, S/o. Mir Hyder Ali, Aged 34 years, Occ: Bouncer in Marriage Functions, R/o. H.No.16-11-294, Moosarambagh, Malakpet, Hyderabad.

...Petitioner/Accused No.9

A N D

The State of Telangana through P.S. L.B.Nagar.

....Respondent/Complainant

Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS

This petition is coming before me on 01-05-2026 for hearing in the presence of M/s.Syed Sameer, Advocate for the Petitioner/Accused No.9 and Smt. B.Padmaja Reddy, Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the State, upon hearing both sides, upon perusing the material papers on record and the matter having stood over for consideration to this day, this Court made the following:

2 :: ORDER ::

1.This is the second bail petition filed by the Petitioner/Accused No.9 under Section 483 of B.N.S.S seeking bail in Crime No.432 of 2026 of

L.B.Nagar Police Station for the offences under Section 310(2), 331(4), 311 of BNS, 2023.

Later the watchman went to inspect the second floor and discovered some lemons lying there and got terrified. The complainant further stated earlier two times also the similar incidents had occurred.

3.The learned counsel for the Petitioner/Accused No.9 submitted that petitioner/A.9 is innocent of the allegations leveled against him and falsely implicated on the basis of the confession of other accused persons. The father of Petitioner/ A.9 is heart patient and request regular attendance. Petitioner/Accused No.9 is ready to furnish sufficient sureties as ordered by the Court for his release on bail. Hence prayed to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.9 on bail.

4. Notice is given to the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and she filed counter submitting that the case is under investigation for arrest of

A.5, A.11 to A.13 and no property is seized from the petitioner/A.9 except mobile phone. Hence prayed to dismiss the petition.

5. Heard both sides.

6. Perused the record.

7. Now the point for consideration is :

Whether the Petitioner/Accused No.9 is entitled to be enlarged on bail as prayed for?

POINT:

8. The allegations against the Petitioner/Accused No.9 is that he along with other accused persons assembled and made preparation for committing dacoity by lurking house trespass by night.

9. Though the Counsel for the Petitioner/Accused No.9 has submitted that the petitioner/ A.9 is innocent and falsely implicated on the basis of alleged confession of other accused persons, all these are the subject matters to be decided during the course of trial. The learned Additional

Public Prosecutor submitted that the case is pending for arrest of A.5,

A.11 to A.13 and no property is seized from the petitioner/ A.9 except mobile phone.

10. Considering the facts and circumstances and perusal of the record shows that the material part of investigation is completed, hence this

Court does not see any reason to detain the Petitioner/Accused No.9 in jail any further and, therefore, this Court is inclined to enlarge the

Petitioner/Accused No.9 on bail, however with certain condition.

11. In the result, the petition is allowed and the Petitioner/Accused

No.9 is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his executing a Personal Bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties for like sum each to the satisfaction of the II Addl. Junior Civil

Judge – cum - II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, at L.B.Nagar and

on further condition that he shall appear before the Station House

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 2nd day of May, 2026.

VIII Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B.Nagar

Copies to :

1. The II AJCJ- cum- II AJMFC, at L.B.Nagar.

2. The SHO P.S. L.B.Nagar

3. The Learned Counsel for Petitioner/accused No.9 (on payment of usual charges).

Order Record 19 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
CRLMP.BAIL/636/2026	MADISETTY AMARENDER KUMAR S/O PENTAIAH vs STATION HOUSE OFFICER,PS LB NAGAR,MALKAJGIRI COMMISSIONERATE	02 May 2026	Bail Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/637/2026	MOHAMMED AHMED NADEEM SOHAIL S/O MA NASEER vs THE STATE OF TELANGANA THROUGH PS LB NAGAR	02 May 2026	Bail Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/639/2026	MOHD AZEEM UDDIN S/O LATE MOHD FAQRUDDIN vs THE STATE OF TELANGANA,THROUGH PS LB NAGAR	02 May 2026	Bail Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/640/2026	MIR YOUNUS ALI ALIAS PARVEZ S/O MIR HYDER ALI vs STATE OF TELANGANA THROUGH PS LB NAGAR	02 May 2026	Bail Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/642/2026	MOHAMMED NISAR AHMED PATEL (A6) vs THE STATE OF TG THROUGH PS LB NAGAR	02 May 2026	Bail Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/645/2026	THUMMA SRINIVAS ALIAS SRINU S/O THUMMA RAJAIAH vs THE STATE OF TELANGANA THROUGH PS LB NAGAR	02 May 2026	Bail Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/604/2026	MALLESHA S/O THIMMANNA vs THE STATE OF TELANGANA THROUGH PS LB NAGAR	01 May 2026	Otherwise	—
CRLMP.BAIL/606/2026	K.MAHABOOB PASHA ALIAS PASHA BHAI S/O K.KATAL AHMED vs THE STATE OF TELANGANA THROUGH PS LB NAGAR,MALKAJGIRI COMMISSIONERATE	01 May 2026	Otherwise	—
CRLMP.BAIL/573/2026	ANGOTHU JAGAN vs PS MEERPET	28 Apr 2026	Bail Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/554/2026	MIR YOUNUS ALI ALIAS PARVEZ S/O MIR HYDER ALI vs STATE OF TELANGANA THROUGH PS LB NAGAR	23 Apr 2026	Bail Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/534/2026	MOHD AZEEM UDDIN S/O LATE MOHD FAQRUDDIN vs THE STATE OF TELANGANA THROUGH PS LB NAGAR	22 Apr 2026	Bail Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/536/2026	THUMMA SRINIVAS ALIAS SRINU S/O THUMMA RAJAIAH vs THE STATE OF TELANGANA THROUGH PS LB NAGAR	22 Apr 2026	Bail Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/563/2026	MADISETTY AMARENDER KUMAR S/O PENTAIAH vs STATIONM HOUSE OFFICER,PS LB NAGAR,MALKAJGIRI COMMISSIONERATE	22 Apr 2026	Bail Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/477/2026	PANASA ANJANEYULU S/O LAXMAIAH vs THE STATE OF TELANGANA THROUGH PS HAYATHNAGAR	17 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/490/2026	MOHAMMED AHMED NADEEM SOHAIL S/O MA NASEER vs THE STATE OF TELANGANA THROUGH PS LB NAGAR	17 Apr 2026	Bail Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/506/2026	MALLESHA S/O THIMMANNA vs THE STATE OF TELANGANA THROUGH PS LB NAGAR	17 Apr 2026	Bail Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/510/2026	MOHAMMED NISAR AHMED PATEL S/O AFEEF UDDIN vs THE STATE OF TS THROUGH PS LB NAGAR	17 Apr 2026	Bail Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/518/2026	K.MAHABOOB PASHA ALIAS PASHA BHAI S/O K.KATAL AHAMED vs THE STATE OF TELANGANA THROUGH PS LB NAGAR,MALKAJGIRI COMMISSIONERATE	17 Apr 2026	Bail Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/533/2026	A10.SYED MUDASER S/O SYED UMAR LATE vs THE STATE OF TELANGANA THROUGH PS LB NAGAR	17 Apr 2026	Bail Order	—

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has DUNDHIGALLA SADHANA handled?

DUNDHIGALLA SADHANA has handled 19 court orders since 2026 at Rangareddy, PDJ Court Complex. The average disposal rate is 14 orders per month.

What types of cases does DUNDHIGALLA SADHANA hear?

Based on available records, DUNDHIGALLA SADHANA primarily handles CRLMP cases at Rangareddy, PDJ Court Complex.

Where is DUNDHIGALLA SADHANA currently posted?

DUNDHIGALLA SADHANA is posted as VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, RangaReddy District at L.B.Nagar at Rangareddy, PDJ Court Complex, Rangareddy, Telangana.

Are judgments by DUNDHIGALLA SADHANA available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by DUNDHIGALLA SADHANA are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does DUNDHIGALLA SADHANA dispose cases?

DUNDHIGALLA SADHANA disposes approximately 14 cases per month, based on 19 orders handled over their tenure at Rangareddy, PDJ Court Complex.

Since when is DUNDHIGALLA SADHANA serving?

DUNDHIGALLA SADHANA has been serving at Rangareddy, PDJ Court Complex since 2026. and is currently posted there.

Case Types

CRLMP 100%

Posting History

Apr 2026 — Present

VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, RangaReddy District at L.B.Nagar · 19 orders
Apr 2026 — Present

IX Additional District and Sessions Judge, RangaReddy District at L.B.Nagar

Other Judges at this Court

Sri A.karna Kumar

Principal District and Sessions Judge

264 orders

Sri. Vinod Kumar

I Additional District and Sessions Judge, RangaRed...

1 orders

Smt. Ch.ashalatha

Chairman, Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal for Rang...

143 orders

Sri.Y.Sathyendra

III Additional District and Sessions Judge, RangaR...

173 orders

Sri. K. Jayaram Reddy

IV ADJ-IV Addl.MSJ-cum-I Addl.Family Court

3 orders

Smt.M.Bhavani

V Additional District and Sessions Judge, RangaRed...

0 orders

Smt.T.JayaLakshmi

X Additional District and Sessions Judge, RangaRed...

891 orders

Smt.M.K.Padmavathi

XI Additional District and Sessions Judge, RangaRe...

0 orders

Smt T Anitha

XII Additional District and Sessions Judge, RangaR...

0 orders

Smt.M.Vani

Special Sessions Judge for Fast tracking the Cases...

1,621 orders

Ms. K. C. Reddy Devarapalli

II Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-II Addl.Judic...

0 orders

Smt.Shraddha Sehgal

Judicial Magistrate of First Class-Special(Mobile)...

87 orders

Ms.Penumala Gopika Naga Sravya

Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Excise...

69 orders

Ms. S.Swarna Mallika

III Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-III Addl.Jud...

21 orders

Sri B.Kiran Teja

VI Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-VI Addl.Judic...

45 orders

Ms. Shereena Mohd

Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistra...

0 orders

Mrs. Sravana Swathi Chintada

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-I Metropolitan Magi...

2 orders

Sri J.Hanumantha Rao

Principal Senior Civil Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Ma...

12 orders

Arpitha Maram Reddy

II Addl. Senior Civil Judge-cum-II Addl.Chief Judi...

24 orders

Sri. Gannarapu Sudarshan

Family Court Judge

0 orders

Smt. P. Srivani

Additional Family Court, L.B.Nagar

0 orders

G. Srinivas

Special Sessions Judge for trial and Disposal of P...

55 orders

Sri G.Sampurna Anand

Commercial Disputes Courts RangaReddy

0 orders

← View all judges at Rangareddy, PDJ Court Complex