Smt G Neelima
I Addl Chief Judge
SEC-BAD, CCC-CSCC-MSJ Court Complex · Hyderabad · Telangana
Order Record 358 total
| Case No. | Parties | Date | Type | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F.C.O.P/200/2016 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 07 Aug 2020 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/57/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 10 Jul 2020 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/167/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 09 Jul 2020 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/33/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 31 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/273/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 31 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/304/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 30 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/100375/2013 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 30 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/459/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 28 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/462/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 28 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/381/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 27 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| MC/75/2015 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 26 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/87/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 26 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/850/2015 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 25 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/111/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 23 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/641/2014 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 23 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/237/2014 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 20 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| MC/1/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 19 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/380/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 19 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/458/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 19 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/530/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 19 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| MC/52/2016 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 18 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/457/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 17 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/461/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 16 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/466/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 16 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/163/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 14 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/450/2015 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 12 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/261/2016 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 10 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| MC/38/2016 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 09 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/116/2016 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 09 Jul 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/742/2015 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 28 Jun 2018 | order | — |
| MC/1/2015 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 27 Jun 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/382/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 27 Jun 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/534/2013 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 27 Jun 2018 | order | — |
| MC/43/2014 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 26 Jun 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/727/2015 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 26 Jun 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/203/2015 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 20 Jun 2018 | order | — |
| OS/10001/2013 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 18 Jun 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/318/2016 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 18 Jun 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/10235/2013 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 14 Jun 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/333/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 12 Jun 2018 | order | — |
| MC/49/2015 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 10 Jun 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/420/2015 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 10 Jun 2018 | order | — |
| MC/8/2016 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 09 Jun 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/100280/2012 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 04 Jun 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/727/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 17 May 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/185/2016 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 14 May 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/470/2015 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 14 May 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/100390/2013 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 13 May 2018 | order | — |
| MC/69/2016 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 12 May 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/117/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 12 May 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/634/2016 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 12 May 2018 | order | — |
| MC/34/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 10 May 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/698/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 08 May 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/708/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 08 May 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/716/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 08 May 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/749/2015 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 03 May 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/6/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 30 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/409/2015 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 30 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/659/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 30 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/737/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 30 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| MC/81/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 28 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/35/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 28 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/39/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 28 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/104/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 28 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/139/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 28 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/481/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 28 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/672/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 28 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/682/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 28 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/603/2016 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 27 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/196/2014 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 26 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/468/2016 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 26 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/188/2014 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 24 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/412/2016 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 23 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/608/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 23 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/100335/2013 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 23 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/36/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 19 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| MC/65/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 17 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/62/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 16 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/43/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 15 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/171/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 15 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/606/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 15 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/609/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 15 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/616/2016 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 15 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/98/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 11 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/544/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 10 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/614/2013 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 10 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| MC/99/2013 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 09 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/73/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 09 Apr 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/739/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 28 Mar 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/750/2015 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 28 Mar 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/293/2015 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 27 Mar 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/143/2015 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 23 Mar 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/641/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 21 Mar 2018 | order | — |
| MC/30/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 20 Mar 2018 | order | — |
| OS/4/2015 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 19 Mar 2018 | order | — |
| OS/1/2014 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 16 Mar 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/194/2015 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 14 Mar 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/235/2015 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 13 Mar 2018 | order | — |
| F.C.O.P/34/2018 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 11 Mar 2018 | order | — |
| MC/105/2017 | XXXXX vs XXXXX | 10 Mar 2018 | order | — |
Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)
| Aug 2020 | 1 | |
| Jul 2020 | 2 | |
| Jul 2018 | 26 | |
| Jun 2018 | 15 | |
| May 2018 | 12 | |
| Apr 2018 | 32 | |
| Mar 2018 | 17 | |
| Feb 2018 | 21 | |
| Jan 2018 | 11 | |
| Dec 2017 | 17 | |
| Nov 2017 | 11 | |
| Oct 2017 | 19 |
Log in for full trend data.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many cases has Smt G Neelima handled?
Smt G Neelima has handled 358 court orders since 2017 at SEC-BAD, CCC-CSCC-MSJ Court Complex. The average disposal rate is 11 orders per month.
What types of cases does Smt G Neelima hear?
Based on available records, Smt G Neelima primarily handles Criminal matters (Criminal Cases) and Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) at SEC-BAD, CCC-CSCC-MSJ Court Complex.
Where is Smt G Neelima currently posted?
Smt G Neelima is posted as I Addl Chief Judge at SEC-BAD, CCC-CSCC-MSJ Court Complex, Hyderabad, Telangana.
How fast does Smt G Neelima dispose cases?
Smt G Neelima disposes approximately 11 cases per month, based on 358 orders handled over their tenure at SEC-BAD, CCC-CSCC-MSJ Court Complex.
Since when is Smt G Neelima serving?
Smt G Neelima has been serving at SEC-BAD, CCC-CSCC-MSJ Court Complex since 2017.
Case Types
Posting History
-
Oct 2019 — Oct 2019
-
Mar 2017 — Aug 2021
Other Judges at this Court