Sri G Rama Krishna

1 FAIR

IN THE COURT OF JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE :: ANAPARTHI

PRESENT: Sri G.Rama Krishna, VIIAddl.Junior Civil Judge, Rajamahendravaram FAC/JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ANAPARTHI

Thursday, this the 24th day of December- 2020

O.S.No.280/2018

Between :

Pulagam Narayana Reddy, S/o veereddy, Age:50 yrs, Hindu cultivation& Business, R/o D.No.3-242, Pasalapudi village, Rayavaram Mandal, E.G.Dist. …Plaintif

And

Chichodu Veeraju, S/o Lakshmudu, age:40 yrs, Hindu, Junior Assistant, Girijana Primary co-operative Marketing society Unit Chinturu village and mandal E.G.Dist.…Defendant

This suit is coming on 17-12-2020 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri R.V.G.Patnaik Advocate for plaintiff and defendant was remained set exparte and having stood over for consideration to this day, this court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

1.The Plaintiff filed this suit based on promissory note dated 29-11-2015 for recovery of an amount of Rs.3,40,666/- from the defendant with subsequent interest at rate of 24% per annum whenever the plaintiff demands for repayment or to his order on demand.

2. The brief averments of the plaint are as follows:

Defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- from the plaintiff on 29-11-2015, for the purpose of his family expenses and to discharge his sundry debts and agreeing to repay the same with interest @ 24% per annum and executed an demand promissory note on 29-11-2015 in favour of the plaintiff on receipt of the consideration from the plaintiff in the presence of two attesters and scribe at Pasalapudi village, and the said original promissory note is here with filed.

3In spite of several demands made by the plaintiff personally, the defendant failed to repay the suit promissory note debt and he postponing the repayment on some pretext or other. While, being,so the plaintiff got issued Registered Legal Notice to the defendant on 09-10-2018 though his 2 advocate and the notice not claimed by the defendant on 17-10-2018. But the defendant neither gave any reply not paid any amount to the plaintiff.

Therefore, the plaintiff has got every right to file this suit for recovery of the debt due under the promissory note together with costs and subsequent interest. Hence the suit.

3.Summons to defendant through personally served, As such the defendant called absent. No representation. Hence defendant remained set exparte on 19-12-2019,

4.To prove the case plaintiff, he himself examined as P.W. 1 and got marked Exs.A1.to A4.

5.Heard for plaintiff.

6.Now Point for consideration :

Whether plaintiff is entitled the suit claim as prayed for or

not ?

7.To substantiate the case of plaintiff, plaintiff himself examined as P.W.1.

by filing examination in chief as affidavit by reiterated the contents of plaint.

Through this witness Ex.A1 to A4 are marked. As defendant was set remained set exparte the evidence of P.W.1 is unchallenged. As seen from the entire material on record, it clearly appears that the plaintiff exhibited three documents. i,e Ex.A1 is the Original promissory note executed by defendant in favour of plaintiff dt 19-11-2015, Ex.A2 is the Registered legal notice got issued by plaintiff dt 20-05-2016, Ex.A3 is the Postal acknowledgement from 1stof defendant, ExA4 is the Postal acknowledgement from 2nd defendant. on perused the said document, it appears the signature and thumb impression of defendant. Ex.A1 further shows that defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- for his necessities by agreeing to repay the same with interest at the rate of 24% p.a. As such Ex.A1 corroborates with the version of plaintiff. On repeated demands made by the plaintiff the defendant did not repay the suit amount.

On considered the unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff clinchingly 3 established that defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- from the plaintiff on 11-09-2016 as such defendant had borrowed by agreeing to repay the same with interest @ 24% per annum. Hence plaintiff is entitled suit claim. Accordingly this point answered in favour of plaintiff.

8. In the result, the suit is decreed with costs directing the defendant to pay a sum of Rs. 3,40,666/- to the plaintiff together with subsequent interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of decree and at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till the date of realization on the principal sum of Rs.2,00,000/- .

Type to dictation to stenographer-III corrected and pronounced by me in open court on this the 24th day of December- 2020.

VII Addl.Junior Civil Judge, Rajamahendravaram, FAC/ Junior Civil Judge, Anaparthi.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANT:

PW.1: Pulagam Narayana Reddy --None--

DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR

FOR PLAINTIFF: Ex.A1/ 17-12-2020 : The Original promissory note executed by the defendant in favour of the Plaintiff 19-11-15 Ex.A2/ 17-12-2020: Registered Legal Notice got issued by plaintiff

dt:20-05-2016.

Ex.A3/ 03-12-2020: Postal acknowledgement from 1st defendant

Ex.A4/17-12-2020 :Postal Acknowledgement from 2nd defendant

FOR DEFENDANT : --Nil-- VII Addl.Junior Civil Judge, Rajamahendravaram, FAC/ Junior Civil Judge, Anaparthi.

1

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE

ANAPARTHI

Present: Sri G.Rama Krishna, VII Addl. J.F.C. Magistrate FAC Judl. First Class Magistrate, Anaparthi

Dated this the 31st Day of December- 2020

C.C.No.278/ 2020 (Cr.No.97/2020 of Anaparthi P.S)

Between:

State:Sub Inspector of Police, Anaparthi Police Station. … Complainant.

AND

Saka Prasad@ Aagadu, S/o Pattabhi Ramayya, Age:33 yrs, D.No.4-167, Devi Centre, G.Donthamuru, Village, Rangampeta mandal … Accused.

This case is coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of A.P.P. for State and the accused is having admitted the offence, and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

The Sub Inspector of Police, Anaparthi P.S. filed charge sheet against the accused for the offence punishable U/s 379 or 411 of IPC in Cr.No.97/2020.

Accused produced before me from central Prison Rajamahendravaram through escorts police and copies was served to accused U/sec 207

Cr.P.C., thereafter accused is a examined U/sec 239 Cr.P.C. for the offence U/sec 379 or 411 of IPC and charges were framed in which accused reported that he was committed theft of buffeloes as such he admitted the charge U/sec 379 of IPC voluntarily. Accordingly accused found guilty for the offence U/sec 379 of IPC and on questioning of quantum of sentence the accused reported that he was wife and children and he has to look after their welfare and it is first offence committed by him and if he remain present in the jail, his family will suffer as such Hon’ble court take lient view and imposing punishment.

2

Perused the case record and it is not a fit case for application of

Sec,360 Cr.P.C. so as the provision of Probations of offenders Act and since the accused voluntarily admitted guilty as such accused is sentenced U/sec 239(2) Cr.P.C. for the offence U/sec 379 IPC, accordingly the accused shall go simple imprisonment for a period of four months 18 days and shall pay a fine of Rs.200 in default of payment of fine amount of Rs.200 in default of payment fine amount she shall go simple imprisonment for a period of one week.

The unmarked property I,e One she buffaloe shall return to the defacto-complainant and file acknowledgement before this court by the police and the remand period of from 13-08-2020 to till this day shall be set off U/sec 428 of Cr.P.C.

Sd/- G.Rama Krishna

VII ADDL. J.F.C.MAGISTRATE,

RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM

(FAC) J.F.C.MAGISTRATE,

ANAPARTHI.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Nil.

Sd/- G.Rama Krishna

VII ADDL. J.F.C.MAGISTRATE,

RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM

(FAC) J.F.C.MAGISTRATE,

ANAPARTHI.

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE

ANAPARTHI

Present: Sri G.Rama Krishna, VII Addl. J.F.C. Magistrate FAC Judl. First Class Magistrate, Anaparthi

Dated this the 31st Day of December- 2020

C.C.No.277/ 2020 (Cr.No.97/2020 of Anaparthi P.S)

Between:

State:Sub Inspector of Police, Anaparthi Police Station. … Complainant.

AND

Saka Prasad@ Aagadu, S/o Pattabhi Ramayya, Age:33 yrs, D.No.4-167, Devi Centre, G.Donthamuru, Village, Rangampeta mandal … Accused.

This case is coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of A.P.P. for State and the accused is having admitted the offence, and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

The Sub Inspector of Police, Anaparthi P.S. filed charge sheet against the accused for the offence punishable U/s 379 or 411 of IPC in Cr.No.97/2020.

Accused produced before me from central Prison Rajamahendravaram through escorts police and copies was served to accused U/sec 207

Cr.P.C., thereafter accused is a examined U/sec 239 Cr.P.C. for the offence U/sec 379 or 411 of IPC and charges were framed in which accused reported that he was committed theft of buffeloes as such he admitted the charge U/sec 379 of IPC voluntarily. Accordingly accused found guilty for the offence U/sec 379 of IPC and on questioning of quantum of sentence the accused reported that he was wife and children and he has to look after their welfare and it is first offence committed by him and if he remain present in the jail, his family will suffer as such Hon’ble court take lient view and imposing punishment.

Perused the case record and it is not a fit case for application of

Sec,360 Cr.P.C. so as the provision of Probations of offenders Act and since the accused voluntarily admitted guilty as such accused is sentenced U/sec 239(2) Cr.P.C. for the offence U/sec 379 IPC, accordingly the accused shall go simple imprisonment for a period of four months 18 days and shall pay a fine of Rs.200 in default of payment of fine amount of Rs.200 in default of payment fine amount she shall go simple imprisonment for a period of one week.

The unmarked property I,e One she buffaloe shall return to the defacto-complainant and file acknowledgement before this court by the police and the remand period of from 13-08-2020 to till this day shall be set off U/sec 428 of Cr.P.C.

Sd/- G.Rama Krishna

VII ADDL. J.F.C.MAGISTRATE,

RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM

(FAC) J.F.C.MAGISTRATE,

ANAPARTHI.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Nil.

Sd/- G.Rama Krishna

VII ADDL. J.F.C.MAGISTRATE,

RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM

(FAC) J.F.C.MAGISTRATE,

ANAPARTHI.

1

IN THE COURT OF THE IV ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE AT

RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM.

Present:­  Sri G.RAMA KRISHNA, VII Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate, Rajamahendravaram (FAC) IVAddl. Judicial First Class Magistrate, Rajamahendravaram Saturday, the 13th day of August, 2022.

C.C.No.1060/2021

(Cr.No.196 of 2020  of Korukonda Police Station)

BETWEEN:

The State, rep. by the Station House Officer, 

Korkonda Police Station.... Complainant

AND 1Bandaru Manikanta Swamy @ Manikanta

Swamy, S/o.Tatarao, A/19 years, C/OC, D No.2­... Accused

43, Devi Center, Nadigatla Village of Korukonda Mandal.

Borra Chinna Venkateswarlu, S/o Brahmayya, 2A/50 years, C /SC, D No.3­140, Gadala Village of Korukonda Mandal.

Jaalimi Lavakusha, S/o Chittayya, A/53 years, 3 Gadala Village of Korukonda Mandal.

Kaakileti Subbarao, S/o Ramayya, A/52 years, Gadala Village of Korukonda Mandal. 4 Duggana Satyarao, S/o Sriramulu, A/44 years, D DNo.8­33,Station Street, Pedabrahmadevam Village.. 5

Addala Adi Narayana, S/o Veerraju, A/28 years, D No.4­44/2, Gunisetti Vari Street, Gadala 6 Village of Korukonda Mandal..

Madiki Peda Arjun, S/o Veerayya, A/56 years, 7 C/SC Mala, Gadala Village of Korukonda Mandal.

Nukatathi Yesu, S/o venkanna, A/55 years, D.No.4­172, SC Peta Gadala Village of Korukonda 8 Mandal.

Rayudu Babu, S/o Ramakrishna, A/45 years, 9 C/SC Mala, D No.3­72, Gadala Village of Korukonda Mandal.

This case came up before me at NATIONAL LOK ADALAT held on 13.08.2022 in the presence of the learned A.P.P. for the complainant and having stood over till this day for consideration, this Court delivered the following: 

2

J U D G M E N T

Police called present. Summons of accused served. Accused A1 to A9 called present and they were examined under Section 251 Cr.P.C for the offence U/Sec.269

IPC for which they reported pleading guilty voluntarily and on hearing quantum of sentence, the accused A1to A9 reported that they having old aged parents and they have to look after their welfare as such Court may take lenient view while imposing punishment. Accordingly the accused A1 to A9 are convicted U/Sec.252 Cr.P.C for the offence U/Sec.269 IPC and the accusedA1 to A9 shall pay fine of Rs.500/­ (Rupees

Five Hundred each only) in default of payment of fine, the accused A1 to A9 shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of ONE MONTH. No property produced.

Hence no order with regard to property. 

Pronounced by me on this the 13th day of August 2022.

VII ADDL.J.F.C.MAGISTRATE

(FAC) IV ADDL.J.F.C.MAGISTRATE,

Rajamahendravaram

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE & WITNESSES EXAMINED 

­ Nil ­

VII A.J.F.C.M.

1

IN THE COURT OF THE IV ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE AT

RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM.

Present:­  Sri G.RAMA KRISHNA, IV Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate, Rajamahendravaram (FAC) VII Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate, Rajamahendravaram Saturday, the 13th day of August, 2022.

C.C.No.3124/2022

(Cr.No.328/2020  of Korukonda Police Station)

BETWEEN:

The State, rep. by the Station House Officer,

Korukonda Police Station, Korukonda... Complainant

AND

Penugula Lakshmana Rao, S/o.Konadaiah, Age/47 years, C/SC­Mala, Muggalla Village of Seetanagaram

... Accused

Mandal.

This case came up before me at NATIONAL LOK ADALAT held on 13.08.2022 in the presence of the learned A.P.P. for the complainant and having stood over till this day for consideration, this Court delivered the following: 

J U D G M E N T

The State, rep. by the Station House Officer, Korukonda Police Station, Korukonda filed a charge sheet against the accused for the offence U/sec.379 of IPC in Crime No.328/2020 of Korukonda Police Statiion, Korukonda. 

Summons served on accused. Accused present and he is identified by court constable, case copies furnished to him U/Sec.207 Cr.P.C and accused is examined U/Sec.239 Cr.P.C for the offence U/Sec.379 Indian Penal Code against accused. Thereafter charge has been framed and read over and explained to him in Telugu Language, for which accused reported pleading guilty voluntarily and on hearing quantum of sentence, accused reported that he is having old age parents and he has to look after their welfare as such Court may take lenient view while imposing punishment. Accordingly accused is convicted U/Sec.252 Cr.P.C for the offence U/Sec.379 IPC and accused shall pay fine of Rs.7,000/­ (Rupees Seven thousand only) in default of payment of fine, accused shall, undergo simple imprisonment for a period of ONE WEEK. The unmarked property if any shall be returned to property owner and police is directed to file receipt before this court. The bail bonds of the accused shall be in force for a period of six months.

Pronounced by me on this the 13th day of August 2022.

VII ADDL.J.F.C.MAGISTRATE,

(FAC) IV ADDL.J.F.C.MAGISTRATE,

Rajamahendravaram

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE & WITNESSES EXAMINED 

­ Nil ­

VII A.J.F.C.M.

(FAC) IV A.J.F.C.M.