Sri.g.shanmukarao

I Addl.Senior Civil Judge,Kakinada

III Addl District Court Kakinada · East Godavari · Andhra Pradesh

Sri.G.SHANMUKARAO, I Addl.Senior Civil Judge,Kakinada, is posted at III Addl District Court Kakinada, East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh, India. 115 court orders on record since 2017. 2 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, EP, E cases.

115

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

SC/100060/2017 Acquitted

S.I. of police, Kakinada vs Ayirapu Kurmarao

03 Nov 2017

1 Fair Judgment in S.C.60/2017

dt:03.11.2017.

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT SESSIONS

JUDGE :: KAKINADA

Present: Sri G.Shanmukha Rao,

I Addl. Assistant Sessions Judge

Friday, the 3rd day of November, 2017

SESSIONS CASE NO.60/2017

Between:

State : Sub Inspector of Police,

Karapa P.S...Complainant.

And

Ayirapu Kurmarao, S/o. Late Venkanna, age 46 years, C/SC Mala, D.No.1-31,

Z.Bhavaram village, Karapa Mandal...Accused.

The case is coming on 27.10.2017 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri G.S.V.Prasad Rao, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Advocate for complainant and of Sri D.Ashok Kumar, Advocate for accused and the matter is having stood over for consideration to this day, this Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

1. This Sessions case arises out of P.R.C.18/2016 on the file of

IV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kakinada, in Crime

No.49/2016 of Karapa Police Station, under Section 436 I.P.C., which has been committed to the Court of Sessions by virtue of an Order

dated:4.1.2017 by the IV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Kakinada.

2. The case of the prosecution is that Gedada Nagaratnam/P.W.1 blessed with three children i.e., two sons and one daughter. Her younger son Gedada Sathibabu is living with her. Her elder son and his wife are at abroad. Soon after the death of husband of

Nagaratnam, she developed extra marital life with the accused. Since her children are growing up, Nagaratnam is not allowing the accused to her house and on that accused developed bore grudge against 2 Fair Judgment in S.C.60/2017

dt:03.11.2017.

Nagaratnam/P.W.1. While so, on 1.4.2016 night while P.W.1

Nagaratnam and other family members are in deep sleep, one

Gubbala Suresh/L.W.4 knocked the doors of her house by crying loudly that her thatched house was burning. Then then they woke up and came out from the house and found the flames were raising.

Then the neighbours tried to extinguish the fire and called fire service. The fire service came to the spot and extinguished the flames. Due to this mishap, iron almyrah, cash, gold, clothes, refrigerator, cot and other articles were gutted with fire. L.W.4

G.Suresh witnessed that the accused is present at the scene of offence at the time of occurrence.

ii) P.W.1 Gedada Nagaratnam gave a report to Karapa Police.

P.W.3 A.Gangaraju, Assistant Sub Inspector of Police, Karapa P.S., registered a case in Crime No.49/2016 under Sec.436 I.P.C., and investigated into. He examined six witnesses, recorded their statements, visited scene of offence, photographed the same and prepared rough sketch. On 4.7.2016 at 7.30 a.m., L.W.9 M.Janaki

Ram, Sub Inspector of Police, Karapa P.S., arrested the accused at his house. After completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed.

3. The learned IV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Kakinada, has taken cognizance in this matter for the offence under

Sec.436 I.P.C.

4. After receipt of the summons, the accused appeared

before the Committal Court and the copies furnished under Sec.207

Cr.P.C.

3 Fair Judgment in S.C.60/2017

dt:03.11.2017.

5. The learned IV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Kakinada, committed the case under Sec.209 Cr.P.C., under proceedings dt:4.1.2017 to the Court of Sessions, East Godavari

Division, Rajamahendravaram, since the offence under Sec.436 I.P.C., is exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions.

6. The Hon’ble District and Sessions Judge, East Godavari,

Rajamahendravaram, took the case on file under Sec.436 of I.P.C., and registered the same as Sessions Case No.60 of 2017 and made over the same to this Court for disposal in accordance with law.

7. On appearance of the accused, he was examined under

Sec.228 Cr.P.C., he denied the allegations made against him and a charge for the offence under Sec.436 I.P.C., has been framed, read over and explained to the accused in Telugu, for which the accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

8. During course of trial, the prosecution examined P.Ws.1 to 3 and marked Exs.P.1 to P.8 and M.O.1.

9. After completion of prosecution evidence, the accused was examined under Sec.313 Cr.P.C., denied the incriminating evidence and reported no defence evidence.

10. Heard the arguments of both sides.

11. Now the point that arises for determination is:

Whether the prosecution has proved the charge for

the offence under Sec.436 I.P.C., against the

accused beyond all reasonable doubt?

4 Fair Judgment in S.C.60/2017

dt:03.11.2017.

12. P O I N T:-

The case of the prosecution is that the accused set fire the house of P.W.1 Gedada Nagaratnam.

13. Gedada Nagaratnam stated to be the defacto complainant examined as P.W.1. She deposed that she laid a small hut in a Government site. Herself, her youngest daughter and grandson are residing. Prior to one and half year back, at about 10.00 p.m., while they were in sleeping, they noticed lighting.

Immediately, they came out and noticed that her house was burning.

All her household articles were burnt in the house. The neighbours came and extinguished the fire. On the next day at about 12.00

Noon they went to Karapa P.S., and police asked her to put her signature on white paper. She does not know the contents of the report. She did not suspect anybody about the incident. She does not know who is responsible for the incident. Ex.P.1 is her signature.

14. On perusal of Ex.P.4 report, P.W.1 made several allegations and also suspected the accused. But the evidence of

P.W.1 is silent about anything against the accused. She categorically deposed that she does not know who is responsible for the incident and she does not know the contents of the report. Thus, she denied the total contents of her report.

15. During cross-examination by learned A.P.P., she denied her 161 Cr.P.C., statement marked as Ex.P.2 and admitted that she also compromised with the accused. During cross-examination by the learned counsel for the accused, she categorically deposed that she did not witness who set fire to the house. Thus, P.W.1 did not 5 Fair Judgment in S.C.60/2017

dt:03.11.2017.

support the case of prosecution and turned hostile. There is no evidence against the accused.

16. Balla Varalakshmi, who is the daughter of P.W.1, is examined as P.W.2. According to P.W.2, prior to one and half year back at about 10.00 p.m., while she was at her in-laws’ house, she was informed by the villager that the incident taken place.

Immediately she came to scene of offence and noticed that total house of P.W.1 was burnt. On the next day, she along with P.W.1 went to Karapa Police Station and police asked P.W.1 to sign on white paper. She has no suspicion against anybody. She turned hostile.

During cross-examination by the learned A.P.P., she denied her 161

Cr.P.C., statement marked as Ex.P.3. Thus, P.W.2 did not witness the occurrence and after knowing about the occurrence, she came to the scene of offence. P.W.2 did not depose anything against the accused.

She did not support the case of the prosecution and turned hostile.

17. On scrutinizing the evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2, there is no evidence against the accused to show that the accused burnt the house of P.W.1. P.Ws.1 and 2 did not support the case of the prosecution and turned hostile.

18. A.Gangaraju, Assistant Sub Inspector of Police, Karapa P.S., who is the Investigating Officer is examined as P.W.3. His evidence going to show that on 2.4.2016 while he was in the police station,

P.Ws.1 and 2 came to the police station and P.W.1 presented a written report. He registered the report in Crime No.49/2016 under Sec.436

I.P.C. Ex.P.4 is the report and Ex.P.5 is the registered F.I.R. He along with P.Ws.1 and 2 went to the scene of offence, visited the scene of 6 Fair Judgment in S.C.60/2017

dt:03.11.2017.

offence in the presence of mediators and observed the scene of offence. He seized M.O.1 ash from the scene of offence. He also photographed the same and prepared rough sketch. Ex.P.6 is the scene observation report, Ex.P.7 is the rough sketch and Ex.P.8 is the photographs along with C.D. M.O.1 is Ash. On perusal of Ex.P.8 photographs, it is showing that the house was burnt. There is no evidence to show that who burnt the house.

19. P.Ws.1 and 2 did not depose anything against the accused.

In Ex.P.4 report also P.W.1 only suspected the accused. However,

P.W.1 totally denied the contents of Ex.P.4 report except admitting her signature under Ex.P.1. The evidence of P.W.3 only showing registration of crime, visiting the scene of offence, recording the evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2 and recovery of M.O.1 from the scene of offence. But there is no direct evidence against the accused to show that the accused committed the offence and burnt the house. In the absence of direct, cogent and corroborative evidence, the evidence of P.W.3 being the Investigating Officer is no way helpful to the case of the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused beyond all reasonable doubt.

20. The learned A.P.P., also given up the evidence of L.Ws.2, 4 to 7 and 9 i.e., Gedada Sathibabu, Gubbala Suresh, Rayi Chinna,

Kada Apparao, Gubbala Surya Prakash and M.Janaki Ram as the main witness did not support the case of the prosecution.

21. In the above stated circumstances and reasons, the prosecution failed to establish the essential ingredients for the 7 Fair Judgment in S.C.60/2017

dt:03.11.2017.

charge under Sec.436 I.P.C., against the accused beyond all reasonable doubt and the accused is entitled for acquittal.

22. In the result, the accused is found not guilty for the charge under Sec.436 I.P.C., and accordingly, he is acquitted under

Sec.235 (1) Cr.P.C., for the charge under Sec.436 I.P.C. The bail bonds of the accused shall be in force for period of six months as contemplated under Sec.437 (A) Cr.P.C. M.O.1 Ash and the unmarked case property, if any, shall be destroyed after appeal time is over.

Dictated to the Grade II Stenographer, transcribed by her,

corrected and pronounced by me in the Open Court, on this the 3rd day of November, 2017.

Sd/- G.Shanmukha Rao,

I ADDL. ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE,

KAKINADA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Prosecution:

P.W.1: Gedada Nagaratnam (Defacto Complainant)

P.W.2:Balla Varalakshmi (daughter of P.W.1)

P.W.3:A.Gangaraju (Investigating Officer)

For Defence:-NONE

DOCUMENTS MARKED

For prosecution:

Ex.P.1 /02.04.2016:Signature of P.W.1 on the report.

Ex.P.2 /02.04.2016:161 Cr.P.C., statement of P.W.1.

Ex.P.3 /02.04.2016:161 Cr.P.C., statement of P.W.2.

Ex.P.4 /02.04.2016:Written report given by P.W.1 to P.W.3.

Ex.P.5 /02.04.2016:Original F.I.R., in Crime No.49/2016 of

S.H.O., Karapa P.S.

Ex.P.6 /02.04.2016:Scene observation report.

Ex.P.7 / –--:Rough sketch of the scene of offence.

8 Fair Judgment in S.C.60/2017

dt:03.11.2017.

Ex.P.8 / --- :Photographs of the scene of offence along with C.D.

For Defence:NIL.

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

M.O.1:Ash

Sd/- G.Shanmukha Rao,

I A.A.S.J.

Kakinada.

9 Fair Judgment in S.C.60/2017

dt:03.11.2017.

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

IN THE COURT OF I ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE ::

KAKINADA

Present: Sri G.Shanmukha Rao,

I Additional Assistant Sessions Judge

1. Number of the Case:S.C. No.60 of 2017

2. Name of the Committing Officer:Smt. Bh.V.Lakshmi Kumari, IV Addl. J.F.C. Magistrate, Kakinada. (PRC No.18/2016)

3. Name of the Complainant :State : Sub Inspector of Police, Karapa P.S. (Crime No.49/2016)

4. Name and description of the accused:

Ayirapu Kurmarao, S/o. Late Venkanna, age 46 years, C/SC Mala, D.No.1-31, Z.Bhavaram village, Karapa Mandal.

5. Date of

a) Offence :02.04.2016

b) Committal :04.01.2017

c) Receipt of record:23.02.2017

d) Appearance of accused:08.08.2017

e) Commencement of trial :23.10.2017

f) Closure of trial :23.10.2017

g) Judgment pronounced :03.11.2017

6. Charge:436 I.P.C.

7. Plea of the accused :Pleaded not guilty

8. Finding of the Court :Found not guilty

9. Sentence or Order :

In the result, the accused is found not guilty for the charge under Sec.436 I.P.C., and accordingly, he is acquitted under Sec.235 (1) Cr.P.C., for the charge under Sec.436 I.P.C. The bail bonds of the accused shall be in force for period of six months as contemplated under Sec.437 (A) Cr.P.C. M.O.1 Ash and the unmarked case property, if any, shall be destroyed after appeal time is over.

10 Fair Judgment in S.C.60/2017

dt:03.11.2017.

-2-

10. Explanation for delay :

This case record is received as made over from the

Hon’ble District & Sessions Court, East Godavari at

Rajamahendravaram on 23.2.2017. On 8.8.2017 the accused was appeared before this Court and on 19.9.2017 accused was examined under Sec.228 Cr.P.C., and Charge under Sec.436 I.P.C., has been framed against him, read over and explained to him in Telugu, for which, he denied the same and claimed to be tried. Schedule is fixed for trial from 17.10.2017. P.Ws.1 to 3 were examined and Exs.P.1 to P.8 and M.O.1 were marked and on 23.10.2017 prosecution evidence was closed and on 27.10.2017 the accused was examined under Sec.313 Cr.P.C., and the matter is posted for arguments from time to time on 27.10.2017 and posted for Judgment to 3.11.2017. On 3.11.2017 Judgment is pronounced. Hence there is no delay.

Sd/- G.Shanmukha Rao,

I ADDL. ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE,

KAKINADA.

Copies submitted to :

The Registrar (Judicial), High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, through the District and Sessions Judge, E.G. Dt., Rajamahendravaram. The Principal District and Sessions Judge, E.G. Dt., Rajamahendravaram. The Director of Prosecution, O/o. D.G.P. & IGP Complex, Saifabad, Hyderabad 500 004.

Copies to :

The District Collector, E.G. Dt., Kakinada. The Superintendent of Police, E.G. Dt., Kakinada. Copy to the Addl. Public Prosecutor, Kakinada.

OS/100193/2017

Pemmadi Sreeramulu vs Kaladi Nookaratnam

27 Oct 2017

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE:

KAKINADA.

Present: Sri G.Shanmukha Rao, I Additional Senior Civil Judge

Friday, the 27th day of October, 2017

ORIGINAL SUIT No.193 of 2017

Between:

Pemmadi Sree Ramulu..Plaintiff.

And

Kaladi Nookaratnam..Defendant.

This suit is coming on this day before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri P.Srini Babu, Advocate for plaintiff and the defendant having called absent and set exparte and upon perusing the material on record and upon hearing the Plaintiff's counsel, the Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

1.The suit has been filed for recovery of a sum of

Rs.7,85,668/- with subsequent interest and costs.

2.Plaintiff examined as P.W.1. Exs.A.1 to A.5 are marked. After receipt of the summons, defendant appear before the

Court and did not file written statement and set ex parte as per the docket order dt:4.10.2017. Heard the plaintiff counsel.

3.Now the point for consideration is:

Whether the suit is liable to be decreed?

4.P O I N T:

Plaintiff examined as P.W.1 and reiterated the plaint contents. Ex.A.1 is the promissory note, Exs.A.2 and A.4 are the office copy of lawyer notice and rejoinder.

5.From the oral evidence of P.W.1, corroborated by documentary evidence Exs.A.1 to A.5, it is showing that the transaction taken place in between plaintiff and defendant on 2.2.2016.

6.The evidence of P.W.1 coupled with Exs.A.1 to A.5 established that the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.6,00,000/- and agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and executed promissory note in favour of the plaintiff on 2.2.2016. The plaintiff could establish his case and the suit is liable to be decreed with costs.

7.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs in favour of plaintiff against defendant for a sum of Rs.7,85,668/- with subsequent interest at 12% p.a., from the date of filing of the suit till the date of decree and thereafter at 6% p.a., till its realisation on

principal amount of Rs.6,00,000/-.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court, this the 27th day of October, 2017.

Sd/- G.Shanmukha Rao

I ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

KAKINADA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF:FOR DEFENDANT:

P.W.1 Pemmadi Sriramulu NONE

DOCUMENTS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF:

Ex.A.1/02.02.2016Original Suit pronote executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.6,00,000/-. Ex.A.2/07.04.2017Office copy of legal notice got issued by the plaintiff to the defendant. Ex.A.3/08.04.2017Postal acknowledgement of the defendant. Ex.A.4/19.04.2017Office copy of rejoinder got issued by the plaintiff to the defendant. Ex.A.5/20.04.2017Postal acknowledgement of the defendant.

For defendant: Nil.

Sd/- G.Shanmukha Rao,

I A.S.C.J.

Kakinada.

Order Record 115 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OS/100654/2015	K.Rama Krishna vs Muppidi Santha Kumari	07 Nov 2017	Judgment	—
SC/100060/2017	S.I. of police, Kakinada vs Ayirapu Kurmarao	03 Nov 2017	Judgment	Acquitted
EP/1000036/2017	Gorusu Sankara Sekhar vs Karri Veerabhadrarao	02 Nov 2017	Order	—
OS/100156/2005	Nakka Veerannna vs Chavvakula Govindu and 17 others	31 Oct 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100082/2017	Padala Veera Venkata Satyanarayana Reddy vs Manyam Subrahmanya Mallikarjuna Venkateswara Rao	30 Oct 2017	Order	—
OS/100389/2017	Rimmalapudi Maha Lakshmi vs Reddi Veera Venkata Satyanarayana	28 Oct 2017	Order	—
OS/100193/2017	Pemmadi Sreeramulu vs Kaladi Nookaratnam	27 Oct 2017	Judgment	—
E.M.C/100513/2017	Patchipalla Madhu vs Chukka Ananatha Lakshmi	27 Oct 2017	Order	—
OS/300187/2015	M.V.V.Naga Lakshmi vs Medapati Veerreddy,	26 Oct 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100088/2011	Dudala Veera Swamy vs Makireddy Bhaskara Ganesh Babu	25 Oct 2017	Order	—
OS/300513/2014	Ms Devi Electricals rep by its Managing partners vs Shri Girija Alloy Power Pvt Ltd	25 Oct 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100370/2015	Koppisetti Veerababu vs BSSVenkateswara rao	23 Oct 2017	Judgment	—
E.M.C/100145/2011	Surampudi Rupavathi vs Vs1.Baditala Devi and 5 others	23 Oct 2017	Order	—
EP/100035/2017	Adabala Parvathi vs Kada Abbai	20 Oct 2017	Order	—
OS/100363/2017	Penke Arjun vs Koppisetti Rama Krishna	20 Oct 2017	Judgment	—
OS/300135/2014	Vinakoti Satyavathi vs Vinakoti Krishna Mohan	20 Oct 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100039/2017	Golakoti Veera Venkata Satyanarayana Murty vs Villa Subbarao	17 Oct 2017	Order	—
EP/1000040/2017	Golakoti Veera Venkata Satyanarayana vs Villa Subbarao	17 Oct 2017	Order	—
OS/100375/2012	Chikkam Satyavathi vs Potnuri RAjendra kumar and five others	17 Oct 2017	Judgment	—
E.M.C/100029/2012	1.Dharmadi Dhanalaxmi 7 others vs Vs1. Malladi Bhairavaswamy alias Bayanna and 2 other	16 Oct 2017	Order	—
OS/100136/2014	Kaki Subba Rao vs Kaki Sattibabu	13 Oct 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100070/2016	Biruda Nooka Lakshmi Durga Bhavani vs Vanumu Kanaka Durga Paripoornamma	11 Oct 2017	Order	—
OS/100670/2016	Mattaparthi Annapurna vs Mattaparthi Vimala @ Kota Mary Ratnam	11 Oct 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100207/2010	Chappidi Swaminadha Rao vs Karanam Satyavathi	10 Oct 2017	Order	—
OS/100168/2014	Gajula Nookaratnam vs Garaga Vara Lakshmi	10 Oct 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100383/2017	Palika Nagaveni vs Palivela Suneela	10 Oct 2017	Judgment	—
E.M.C/100020/2017	State Bank of India,Treasury branch Kakiniada vs Kathula Kezia	09 Oct 2017	Order	—
OS/100524/2015	Padala Krishna Reddy vs Ch.Surya Chadra Rao	06 Oct 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100024/2017	Dondapati Satyam vs The Prinicipal Andhr Polytechnic	05 Oct 2017	Order	—
OS/100377/2016	Seelam Chittibabu vs Devarapu Nirakaramma	05 Oct 2017	Judgment	—
SC/198/2016	AP State Sub Inspector of Police Port PS vs Oleti Nookaraju	04 Oct 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100607/2015	G.Raju vs K.Achiraju	03 Oct 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100120/2016	Yalla Peddi Raju vs Savalam Ramulu	22 Sep 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100783/2015	G.Paddyamma vs S.V.Ramanamma	22 Sep 2017	Judgment	—
E.M.C/100029/2012	1.Dharmadi Dhanalaxmi 7 others vs Vs1. Malladi Bhairavaswamy alias Bayanna and 2 other	22 Sep 2017	Order	—
OS/100111/2017	Morampudi Kasi Viswanadham vs Kondapalli Achanna Chowdary	21 Sep 2017	Order	—
OS/100702/2016	Manyam Kurmanath rep by GPA N Veerabhadra rao vs Guduri BSS Kumari	21 Sep 2017	Judgment	—
OS/300463/2014	1.Vasamsetti Subbalakshmi alias Athili Subbalakshm vs Sripathi Veerabhadrarao and 2 others	20 Sep 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100287/2017	Duppalapudi Satyanarayana vs Mummidi Rambabu	19 Sep 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100076/2015	Kadali Vijaya vs Guntupalli Baburao	18 Sep 2017	Order	—
OS/100698/2015	P.Srinivasa Rao vs J.Rambabu	13 Sep 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100779/2015	Ch.Satyavathi vs Thsildhar,Samalkota	12 Sep 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100216/2017	Velugu Veerraju vs Velugu Satyanarayana @ Sathibabu	11 Sep 2017	Judgment	—
SC/100249/2015	S.I. of police vs Kanithi Veerababu	11 Sep 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100730/2016	Arumilli Venkata Rama Krishna vs Vasamsetti Raghavendra Anjaneyulu	09 Sep 2017	Order	—
OS/100128/2017	Indian Overseas Bank, Kakinada rep by Manager, Kakinada vs Rudri Veera Raghavulu	07 Sep 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100225/2016	Nimmana Satyanandam vs N.Naryanamurhty	07 Sep 2017	Judgment	—
SC/100141/2017	SHO II town PS, KKD vs Boorla Srinu Vooka Srinu	07 Sep 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100057/2017	Pynda Sri Rama Venkata Satyanarayana vs Ponnamanda Venkata Ramana	06 Sep 2017	Order	—
OS/100239/2017	SR Techno Crafts rep by Reddy Usha Rani vs Afzal and sons Industries	05 Sep 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100547/2015	N.S.Satyanarayana vs Y.Lakshmi	04 Sep 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100031/2017	Dayam Madavarao vs Kotipalli Srinivasarao	01 Sep 2017	Order	—
EP/100043/2017	Desetti Surya Rao vs Redoji Surya Rao	01 Sep 2017	Order	—
OS/100298/2016	Mummidi Satya Siva Rama Krishna vs Yallal Veerababu	01 Sep 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100007/2017	Senagala Satyavathi vs Vs1. Padala Srinivasarao and another	31 Aug 2017	Order	—
EP/100015/2017	Pynda Sree Rama Venkata Satyanrayana Murty vs PVVSTS Seshagiri Rao	31 Aug 2017	Order	—
OS/100102/2016	Rikky Kumar Jain vs Yerramsetti Suseela	31 Aug 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100495/2016	State Bank of India rep by Asst. General Manager, Kakinada vs Laxminagar Abhivrudhi Mahila Swasakthi Sangham rep by President, Biruda Satya	31 Aug 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100605/2015	Devabhaktuni Ramesh Babu vs Ragithi Veerraju	31 Aug 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100080/2016	Kapil Chit Funds Pvt. Ltd. vs Vanga Satya Parda Bhanu Murty	30 Aug 2017	Order	—
EP/1000052/2017	Vundavalli Narayanarao vs Peadaprolu Mutyala Krishna	30 Aug 2017	Order	—
OS/100271/2017	Vytla Krishna Prasad vs Balusu Veera Venkata Subbarao	30 Aug 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100752/2012	Chikkam Chakrayamma vs Penkey Balaram	30 Aug 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100082/2015	Surada Rama Babu vs Chepala Krishnamma	28 Aug 2017	Order	—
IP/100011/2015	N.Bhaskar reddy vs M.Mallikarjunudu	28 Aug 2017	Order	—
EP/100077/2016	K.Subbi Reddy vs Matta Veera Bhadrarao	24 Aug 2017	Order	—
OS/300099/2014	Lalith Kumar vs Guvvala Raamreddy	24 Aug 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100022/2016	Nalli Samuel vs Chintapalli Vijayalakshmi	23 Aug 2017	Order	—
EP/100024/2015	Pillarisetti Venkateswara Rao vs P.Vijayakumar	23 Aug 2017	Order	—
EP/100069/2015	Padala Veera Venkata Satyanarayana Reddy vs Adapa Sriramakrishna	23 Aug 2017	Order	—
SC/100244/2015	S.I. of police vs Guthula Srinivas alias Srinu	23 Aug 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100360/2016	Gudla Kanaka Reddy vs Tiragati srivani	21 Aug 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100411/2013	Nanda Apparao vs Podduru Rajasekhar	21 Aug 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100942/2014	Khandavilli Udaya Bhanumurthy vs Guthula Apparao	11 Aug 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100003/2016	Kaja Kishore Kumar vs Sista Santharam	09 Aug 2017	Order	—
OS/100234/2017	Moulali Khan vs Kanakala Kantham	09 Aug 2017	Judgment	—
OS/300294/2014	Dr. Osuri Venkateswararao vs Pidaka Narasimhamurthy	08 Aug 2017	Judgment	—
OS/300782/2014	Yandamuri Lakshmana Swamy vs Narla Satyanarayanamurthy	04 Aug 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100031/2017	Dayam Madavarao vs Kotipalli Srinivasarao	02 Aug 2017	Order	—
E.M.C/100035/2017	Chitturi Parvathi vs Bhupathiraju Ramaraju	02 Aug 2017	Order	—
OS/100421/2015	V.Venkata Rao vs V.Veera Bhadra Rao	01 Aug 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100782/2015	Mudragada Ramakrishna vs Talatam Venkata Lakshmi	31 Jul 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100212/2017	Vasamsetti Sattibabu vs Palivela Suneela	27 Jul 2017	Judgment	—
OS/64/2015	Nurukurthi Nageswara Rao vs Vithanala Manga	26 Jul 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100053/2017	Kurukuri Venkata Swamy vs Yarlagadda Veeraveni	26 Jul 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100666/2016	Koyya Sanyasi Rao vs Vardhineedi Sreenivasa Radhesh	25 Jul 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100015/2017	Pynda Sree Rama Venkata Satyanrayana Murty vs PVVSTS Seshagiri Rao	18 Jul 2017	Order	—
OS/100019/2017	Seeram Raj Kumar vs Komcha Rama Krishna	18 Jul 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100172/2017	Chavvakula Janakiram vs Tangeti Srinivasa Rao	18 Jul 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100175/2017	Balla Suribabu vs Alugula Jojipinni alias Janaki	08 Jul 2017	Order	—
OS/100183/2016	D.RAdha Krishna vs Saladi Lakshmi	08 Jul 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100609/2014	Bejawada Seetharama SWamy vs Sri Surya Enterprises regd by Managing partner	30 Jun 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100035/2017	Adabala Parvathi vs Kada Abbai	29 Jun 2017	Order	—
SC/110/2016	AP State Sub Inspector of police Samalkota P.S. vs Pediredla Krishna	28 Jun 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100088/2016	Voleti Ravi Raju vs Gedha Singa raju	27 Jun 2017	Order	—
EP/100017/2016	Killim Ramireddi vs Vs1. Rasamsetty Suryanarayana	23 Jun 2017	Order	—
OS/100152/2017	Yedida Satyanarayana vs Koppireddi Nagababu	23 Jun 2017	Order	—
OS/100025/2017	Chundru Venkat Rao vs Jalluri Vara Prasad	22 Jun 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100096/2017	RAK Ceramics PVt. Ltd., rep by CS and Legal Offier vs K2s Trading Co.	22 Jun 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100032/2017	Guthavalli Baby Padma Suneela vs Siyyadri Suresh @ Prabhakar	21 Jun 2017	Judgment	—

Showing 100 of 115 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Nov 2017		3
Oct 2017		29
Sep 2017		22
Aug 2017		27
Jul 2017		10
Jun 2017		24

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Sri.G.SHANMUKARAO handled?

Sri.G.SHANMUKARAO has handled 115 court orders since 2017 at III Addl District Court Kakinada. The average disposal rate is 19 orders per month.

What types of cases does Sri.G.SHANMUKARAO hear?

Based on available records, Sri.G.SHANMUKARAO primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Sessions Cases, SCC) at III Addl District Court Kakinada.

Where is Sri.G.SHANMUKARAO currently posted?

Sri.G.SHANMUKARAO is posted as I Addl.Senior Civil Judge,Kakinada at III Addl District Court Kakinada, East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Sri.G.SHANMUKARAO available online?

Yes. 2 judgments by Sri.G.SHANMUKARAO are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Sri.G.SHANMUKARAO dispose cases?

Sri.G.SHANMUKARAO disposes approximately 19 cases per month, based on 115 orders handled over their tenure at III Addl District Court Kakinada.

Since when is Sri.G.SHANMUKARAO serving?

Sri.G.SHANMUKARAO has been serving at III Addl District Court Kakinada since 2017.

Case Types

OS 60%

EP 27%

E 5%

SC 5%

IP 2%

SCC 1%

Posting History

May 2017 — Nov 2017

I Addl.Senior Civil Judge,Kakinada · 115 orders

Outcomes on Record

Acquitted 1

Other Judges at this Court

Smt.G.Anandi

III Addl. District and Sessions Judge,Kakinada

457 orders

K Nagamani

IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge,Kakinada

14 orders

Sri.P.Govardhan

VI Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Kakinada

509 orders

Sri.B.Srinivasu

Principal Senior Civil Judge,Kakinada

6 orders

Sri.N.Vijaya babu

II Addl. Senior Civil Judge,Kakinada

657 orders

Kethavath Moti Lal

III Addl. Senior Civil Judge,Kakinada

326 orders

A.naga Malleswari

Principal Junior Civil Judge,Kakinada

1 orders

Ms.V.Sahithi

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge,Kakinada

798 orders

Smt.S.Mani

II Addl. Junior Civil Judge,Kakinada

2,070 orders

Smt.D.Sree Devi

III Addl. J.F.C. Magistrate Court, Kakinada

3,912 orders

Ms.Nirupa Bhanj Deo

IV Addl. J.F.C. Magistrate Court,Kakinada

0 orders

Smt.Shaik Shireen

V Addl. J.F.C.Magistarte Court,Kakinada

3,923 orders

Smt.N.Usha Lakshmi Kumari

Spl. Mobile J.F.C.Magistrate Court,Kakinada

0 orders

Smt K. Sree Devi

P.O.C.S.O Court Judge Kakinada

210 orders

← View all judges at III Addl District Court Kakinada