Currently Serving

G.shiva Prasad Yadav

Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Anantapur

Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District) · Ananthapur · Andhra Pradesh

G.SHIVA PRASAD YADAV, Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Anantapur, is posted at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District), Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh, India. 833 court orders on record since 2025. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles H, IP, OS cases.

833

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

OS/350/2018

D. Indiramma vs Madela Suseelamma

24 Apr 2026

OS.No.350/2018 1 A.C.J (Sr.D) Court, ATP Dt.24.04.2026

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION) ::

ANANTHAPURAMU

Present :- Sri G.Shiva Prasad Yadav,

Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ananthapuramu.

Friday, this the 24th day of April, 2026

ORIGINAL SUIT No.350/2018

Between : D.Indiramma D/o D.Venkatesh, aged 46 years, Teacher, Previously residing at Krishnapuramu, Bukkapatnam Mandal. Now residing at C/o Kotturappa,

D.No.6/2/88, Kovur Nagar, Ananthapuramu.

… Plaintiff And.,

Maddela Suseelamma, W/o M.Lakshminarayana, residing at D.No.16/231,

Uma Nagar, Old town, Ananthapuramu.

…. Defendant

This suit came on this day i.e. on 09.04.2026 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri L.K.Sudheendranath, Advocate for the plaintiff and of Sri J.Narayana Swamy, Advocate for defendant and the and having perused the entire material on record and having heard the learned counsel for plaintiff and defendant and having stood over for consideration till this day the Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

1.This suit is filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery of suit claim i.e. Rs.3,43,300/- with interest at contract rate on the foot of promissory notes dated 28.07.2015 and award costs of the suit.

2. The brief averments of the plaint pleadings are that:

OS.No.350/2018 2 A.C.J (Sr.D) Court, ATP Dt.24.04.2026

On 28.07.2015 the defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- from the plaintiff for her family necessities agreeing to repay the same together with interest at 24% per annum and executed ‘A’ marked promissory note

dated 28.07.2015 infavour of the plaintiff. Again on the same day on

28.07.2015 the defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- from the plaintiff agreeing to repay the same together with interest at 24% per annum and executed ‘B’ marked promissory note infavour of the plaintiff. Inspite of repeated demands made by the plaintiff, the defendant did not chose to pay any amount either towards principal or interest. Hence having no othergo this suit was filed.

3.The defendant filed written statement denying the averments of plaint pleadings and took her stand that the defendant is working as servant made for Rs.1200/- per month. In the year 2008 the husband of defendant hospitalized, for that the defendant approached the plaintiff and borrowed amount of Rs.60,000/- and executed promissory note infavour of the plaintiff.

Due to financial problems and meager servant made payment charges the defendant not able to discharge the said amount, but she paid interest part from time to time. The defendant totally paid Rs.60,000/- towards interest. But the plaintiff obtained new promissory note in the place of old promissory note including interest part amount. Likewise the plaintiff obtained said two promissory notes without passing consideration amount. The said suit promissory notes are created and fabricated one for wrongful gain. The plaintiff is employee and whenever obtained new promissory notes in the place of old promissory notes, the old promissory notes returned to the defendant. It clearly shows, the plaintiff created the alleged promissory notes for wrongful gain. There is no cause of action for filing this suit and suit promissory notes are materially altered. The plaintiff never demanded the

OS.No.350/2018 3 A.C.J (Sr.D) Court, ATP Dt.24.04.2026

defendant to pay amount and suit promissory notes are forged and created for wrongful gain and prayed to dismiss the suit with costs.

4.Heard arguments on both sides. Perused the record.

5.Based on the above pleadings, the following issues were settled for trial:

1. Whether the suit promissory notes are true, valid and binding on the defendant?

2. Whether the suit promissory notes are supported by consideration?

3. Whether the suit promissory notes are materially altered as pleaded by the defendant?

4. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendant as prayed?

5. To what relief?

6.In order to prove the case, the plaintiff herself was examined as PW.1 and Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 were marked in her evidence. On her behalf, one

Prasad who is said to be attestor of Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 was examined as PW.2

On the other hand, the defendant was examined as DW.1 and Ex.B1 to

Ex.B4 were marked.

Issues No.1 to 4:-

7.The counsels for plaintiff and defendant argued on their own pleadings.

This is the suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery of suit claim on the foot of promissory notes marked under Ex.A1 and Ex.A2. In this nature of suit, the plaintiff must establish her case that the defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- on 28.07.2015 and again on the same day the defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- from the plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum and executed Ex.A1 and

Ex.A2 and failed to make payment.

8.For which the plaintiff was examined as PW.1. In the evidence in chief examination she stated reiterating the contents raised in the plaint pleadings.

OS.No.350/2018 4 A.C.J (Sr.D) Court, ATP Dt.24.04.2026

She was cross examined, wherein she stated, she know the defendant since 2003 and two promissory notes under Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 were executed on the same day and the defendant asked her to lend amount one day prior to execution of Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 and plaintiff had amount with her which is chit withdrawal amount. Ex.A1 was scribed by one Suresh Babu and Ex.A2 was scribed by Kishore Babu and PW.2 was witnessed to Ex.A1 and Ex.A2. She denied that Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 filled up by PW.2 with the help of attestor and scribed just before filing this suit and Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 are created documents.

It is elicited from the evidence of PW.1 in cross examination that Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 were witnessed by PW.2 and one Suresh Babu scribed Ex.A1 and

Kishore Babu scribed Ex.A2.

9.The plaintiff got examined PW.2 who is said to be attestor of Ex.A1 and Ex.A2, he stated in his chief examination that he was present to the transaction under Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 and he witnessed the same and signed in it as attestor. Further he stated one Suresh Babu also present at the time of execution of Ex.A1 and one Kishore Babu present at the time of execution of

Ex.A2 and defendant executed both Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 after receiving consideration of Rs.2 lakhs.

PW.2 was cross examined, in which he stated, earlier he resided in the defendant’s locality, for which only he know the defendant. Ex.A1 was scribed at morning hours and Ex.A2 was scribed at evening hours on the same day.

The defendant affixed thumb impression on suit promissory notes. He denied the suggestion put to him that signature appears on Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 on revenue stamp does not belongs to the defendant.

10.The plaintiff placed Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 as documentary proof to support her case. Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 are ‘A’ and ‘B’ marked suit promissory notes and the contents of it shows, the defendant took amount of Rs.1,00,000/- on

OS.No.350/2018 5 A.C.J (Sr.D) Court, ATP Dt.24.04.2026

28.07.2015 and another Rs.1,00,000/- on the same day and executed Ex.A1 and Ex.A2. Ex.A1 was attested by PW.2 and scribed by one Suresh Babu.

Another promissory note under Ex.A2 was scribed by Kishore Babu and it was also witnessed by PW.2.

So the contents of Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 apart from oral evidence placed by

PW.1 and PW.2 shows the case of plaintiff.

11.The contents of defendant from her written statement that she admitted execution of Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 by putting her signature. But her contention is different as mentioned in the written statement. The contention of defendant from written statement in para No.3 that in the year 2008 the husband of defendant was hospitalized, for which the defendant approached the plaintiff and borrowed amount of Rs.60,000/- and defendant executed promissory note acknowledging the Rs.60,000/- and due to financial problem and in view of her occupation the defendant was not able to discharge the said amount.

But she paid interest part amount in total Rs.60,000/-. But the plaintiff obtained new promissory notes in the place of old promissory notes including interest part. Likewise at last the plaintiff obtained said suit promissory notes without passing consideration amount under said two promissory notes and suit promissory notes were created and fabricated. Further her contention is, suit promissory notes are materially altered one. Suit promissory notes are forged and created for wrongful gain.

12.To prove her contention, the defendant was examined as DW.1. In chief examination she reiterated the contents raised in the written statement and she was cross examined, wherein she stated as “I have executed one

promissory note when I took Rs.60,000/- from plaintiff. I filed the said

promissory note of Rs.60,000/- in court. Ex.B1 to Ex.B4 were obtained

by plaintiff by adding interest to the amount of Rs.60,000/- borrowed by

me from plaintiff.

OS.No.350/2018 6 A.C.J (Sr.D) Court, ATP Dt.24.04.2026

Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 contained my signature. Ex.B4 only contained

the signature of attestor by name Suryanarayana Reddy. Except that

Ex.B4, there are no attestors nor scribe in Ex.B1 to Ex.B3 and Ex.B4.

Ex.B3 contained payment endorsement and it does not contain attestors

and scribe. I took amount of Rs.60,000/- from plaintiff for treatment of

my husband”.

DW.1 denied the suggestion put to her that she borrowed amount from the plaintiff under Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 and to evade payment she took false defence. So it is evident from the cross examination of DW.1 above mentioned that she only executed a promissory note for Rs.60,000/- when she took the same and she also paid said promissory note amount of

Rs.60,000/- in court. Further she stated Ex.B1 to Ex.B4 were obtained by the plaintiff by adding interest to the amount of Rs.60,000/- borrowed by her from the plaintiff. So according to her version, the plaintiff obtained Ex.B1 to Ex.B4 by adding interest to the amount of Rs.60,000/-.

13.The averments of written statement shows, she only borrowed amount of Rs.60,000/- and executed promissory note and she paid interest part in total Rs.60,000/-. But the plaintiff obtained new promissory notes in the place of old promissory note including interest part amount. For which the defendant has not filed any piece of paper to show that she paid interest to the tune of Rs.60,000/- to show her bonafide and even according to her version she borrowed amount of Rs.60,000/- and interest accumulated is

Rs.60,000/-. But the plaintiff obtained new promissory notes in the place of old promissory note including interest part. Even according to her version, the

principal of Rs.60,000/- and its accumulation interest is Rs.60,000/-, in total

Rs.1,20,000/-. Even her evidence in page No.2 at 3rd line shows, Ex.B1 to

Ex.B4 were obtained by the plaintiff adding interest to the amount of

Rs.60,000/- which is principal amount. But Ex.B1 amount is Rs.10,000/-,

OS.No.350/2018 7 A.C.J (Sr.D) Court, ATP Dt.24.04.2026

Ex.B2 amount is Rs.15,000/-, Ex.B3 amount is Rs.25,000/- and Ex.B4 amount is Rs.1,54,000/-, in total Rs.2,04,000/- which exceeds Rs.1,20,000/-.

14.Further the defendant stated in her written statement that finally plaintiff obtained suit promissory notes without passing consideration. So amount under Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 is Rs.2,00,000/- and the amount under Ex.B1 to

Ex.B4 amount is more than Rs.2,00,000/-. But the defendant has not explained how she executed Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 by signing for less amount.

Even Ex.B1 to Ex.B4 also are having no attestors and scribe and even no particulars of Ex.B1 to Ex.B4 in the written statement that on which dates the alleged Ex.B1 to Ex.B4 were executed by the defendant infavour of plaintiff, except one word mentioned that plaintiff obtained promissory notes in the place of old promissory note by adding interest. There are no details of date, month and year when plaintiff took the alleged promissory notes. Even the plaintiff case is also not about existence of Ex.B1 to Ex.B4. Further the defendant has not at all examined any witnesses to support her contention except her sole testimony. Further the defendant took plea of material alteration in Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 in her written statement, but she has not mentioned any particulars where material alteration took place and it appears she took only bald plea and finally the defendant failed to prove her defence.

15.On the other hand, the plaintiff proved her case by placing oral and documentary proof and even the defendant admitted her signature in Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 and plaintiff also proved its due execution. Hence presumption under Section 113 of N.I. Act also attracts that consideration was passed under Ex.A1 and Ex.A2. So in the light of above discussion, the plaintiff proved her case and she is entitled for the relief as sought. Accordingly, issues No.1 to 4 are answered.

OS.No.350/2018 8 A.C.J (Sr.D) Court, ATP Dt.24.04.2026

16.Issue No.5:-

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs for a sum of

Rs.3,43,300/- with subsequent interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till the date of realization on the principal amount of

Rs.1,00,000/- and Rs.1,00,000/-.

Typed to my direct dictation to the Stenographer, corrected and

pronounced by me in Open Court this the 24th day of April, 2026.

Sd/- G.Shiva Prasad Yadav

Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ananthapuramu.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

Plaintiff: Defendant:

PW.1: D.Indiramma (Plaintiff) DW.1: M.Suseelamma (Defendant) PW.2: M.Prasad

Documents Marked by Plaintiff

Ex.A1: Original ‘A’ marked Promissory note dt.28.07.2015 executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff for Rs.1,00,000/-. Ex.A2: Original ‘B’ marked Promissory note dt.28.07.2015 executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff for Rs.1,00,000/-.

Exhibits marked by Defendant

Ex.B1: Promissory note dt.03.06.2008 executed by the defendant infavour of plaintiff for Rs.10,000/-. Ex.B2: Promissory note dt.09.06.2008 executed by the defendant infavour of plaintiff for Rs.15,000/-. Ex.B3: Promissory note dt.09.09.2008 executed by the defendant infavour of plaintiff for Rs.25,000/-. Ex.B4: Promissory note dt.13.04.2014 executed by the defendant infavour of plaintiff for Rs.1,54,000/-.

Sd/- G.Shiva Prasad Yadav

A.C.J (Sr.D)

OS/87/2024

Modupalli Venkataswamy S/o Modupalli Narayanappa vs D.Sreeramulu S/o D.Narayana

28 Apr 2026

OS.No.87/2024 1 A.C.J (Sr.D) Court, ATP Dt.28.04.2026

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION) ::

ANANTHAPURAMU

Present :- Sri G.Shiva Prasad Yadav,

Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ananthapuramu.

Tuesday, this the 28th day of April, 2026

ORIGINAL SUIT No.87/2024

Between : Modupalli Venkata Swamy, S/o Modupalli Narayanappa, aged 70 years, Retired Employee, residing at Cherlopalli village, Rapthadu Mandal, Ananthapuramu District. … Plaintiff And.,

D.Sreeramulu, S/o D.Narayana, aged 55 years, residing at Uppunesina Palli village, Chigicherla Post, Dharmavaram Mandal, Ananthapuramu District.

Now residing at D.No.28/4/268/3, Vijayanagar colony, Ananthapuramu.

…. Defendant

This suit came on this day i.e. on 06.04.2026 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri M.Murali Mohan, Advocate for the plaintiff and of Sri V.Ramanjineyulu Chowdary, Advocate for defendant and the and having perused the entire material on record and having heard the learned counsel for plaintiff and defendant and having stood over for consideration till this day the Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

1.This suit is filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery of suit claim i.e. Rs.21,52,000/- with interest at contract rate on the foot of promissory notes dated 06.08.2015 and 16.08.2015 and award costs of the suit.

2. The brief averments of the plaint pleadings are that:

OS.No.87/2024 2 A.C.J (Sr.D) Court, ATP Dt.28.04.2026

The defendant borrowed amount of Rs.4,00,000/- from the plaintiff on 06.08.2015 and again he borrowed an amount of Rs.4,00,000/- on 16.08.2015 agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum for his family necessities and executed A and B marked promissory notes in favour of the plaintiff. Later the defendant paid Rs.500/- on 06.08.2018 and again paid Rs.1,80,000/- on 29.07.2021 regarding ‘A’ marked promissory note and further he paid Rs.500/- on 16.08.2018 and Rs.1,80,000/- on 29.07.2021 towards ‘B’ marked promissory note and both endorsements made on the back of ‘A’ and ‘B’ marked promissory notes and failed to make balance amount by the defendant inspite of demands made by the plaintiff.

Hence having no othergo this suit was filed.

3.The defendant engaged counsel and filed written statement denying the averments of plaint pleadings and took his stand that defendant obtained financial assistance and made signature according to version of plaintiff and no such amount was given by the plaintiff and defendant paid entire amount to the plaintiff and family members and regularly made transactions. Recently misunderstandings arose in between them and plaintiff, taking advantage of signature of defendant without demanding issue notice to the defendant. The defendant never paid the alleged promissory notes endorsements amount and they were brought up and filed false case and prayed to dismiss the suit by imposing exemplary cost.

4.Heard arguments for plaintiff and no representation for defendant.

Hence arguments of defendant treated as nil.

5.Based on the above pleadings, the following issues were settled for trial:

1. Whether the suit promissory notes dated 06.08.2015 for

rs.4,00,000/- and dated 16.08.2015 for Rs.4,00,000/- are true,

valid and binding on the defendant?

OS.No.87/2024 3 A.C.J (Sr.D) Court, ATP Dt.28.04.2026

2. Whether payment endorsements on two promissory notes are true?

3. Whether the plaintiff is entitled suit claim as prayed?

4. If so, what relief?

6.In order to prove the case, the plaintiff was examined as PW.1 and

Ex.A1 to Ex.A6 were marked in his evidence and defendant did not cross examine PW.1 inspite of opportunities, hence cross of PW.1 was treated as nil.

The defendant was given opportunities to adduce evidence, but no evidence was adduced. Hence defendant’s evidence was closed. Now the evidence of PW.1 is on record.

Issues No.1 to 3:-

7.Since the plaintiff filed this suit basing on the suit promissory notes marked under Ex.A1 and Ex.A2, the initial burden lies upon the plaintiff to prove the contents of Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 and passing of consideration.

For which the plaintiff adduced evidence by examining himself as

PW.1. In the evidence PW.1 has stated reiterating the contents raised in the plaint pleadings, but he was not cross examined by the defendant despite opportunities. So the evidence of PW.1 is remained unchallenged.

8.The plaintiff placed Ex.A1 to Ex.A6 on his behalf and got marked.

Ex.A1 and Ex.A4 are suit promissory notes dated 06.08.2015 and 16.08.2015. The contents of Ex.A1 shows, the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.4,00,000/- from the plaintiff on 06.08.2015 and executed suit promissory note. Ex.A4 is another promissory note dated 16.08.2015 for

Rs.4,00,000/- alleged to be executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff. Both suit promissory notes/Ex.A1 and Ex.A4 appears they were scribed by the defendant only and they were witnessed by C.Sreenivasulu and M.Thippaiah. Ex.A2 and Ex.A3 are payment endorsements under which the defendant paid a sum of Rs.500/- and also Rs.1,80,000/- on different

OS.No.87/2024 4 A.C.J (Sr.D) Court, ATP Dt.28.04.2026

dates, made endorsements on the back of Ex.A1. Ex.A5 and Ex.A6 are also payment endorsements which shows, the defendant paid sum of Rs.500/- and Rs.1,80,000/- on different dates and made endorsements on the back of

Ex.A4. So the alleged documents shows the case of plaintiff.

9.Though the defendant has taken stand in his written statement that suit is liable for dismissal with costs as no such amount was given by the plaintiff to him, the defendant did not cross examine PW.1 nor adduced evidence, at least the defendant himself did not come into witness box to say his case.

Hence the contention of written statement cannot be taken into consideration in the absence of evidence.

On the other hand the plaintiff placed oral and documentary proof and proved his case. So in the light of above discussion, the plaintiff is entitled for the relief as sought. Accordingly, issues No.1 to 3 are answered.

10.Issue No.4:-

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs for a sum of

Rs.21,52,000/- with subsequent interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till the date of realization on the principal amount of

Rs.4,00,000/- and Rs.4,00,000/-.

Typed to my direct dictation to the Stenographer, corrected and

pronounced by me in Open Court this the 28th day of April, 2026.

Sd/- G.Shiva Prasad Yadav

Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ananthapuramu.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

Plaintiff: Defendant:

PW.1: M.Venkataswamy (Plaintiff) - None-

OS.No.87/2024 5 A.C.J (Sr.D) Court, ATP Dt.28.04.2026

Documents Marked by Plaintiff

Ex.A1: Suit promissory note dt.06.08.2015 for Rs.4,0,000/-

Ex.A2: Endorsement on the back of Ex.A1 dt.06.08.2018 for Rs.500/-

Ex.A3: Endorsement on the back of Ex.A1 dt.29.07.2021 for Rs.1,80,000/-

Ex.A4: Suit promissory note dt.16.08.2015 for Rs.4,00,000/-

Ex.A5: Endorsement on the back of Ex.A4 dt.16.08.2018 for Rs.500/-

Ex.A6: Endorsement on the back of Ex.A4 dt.29.07.2021 for Rs.1,80,000/-

Exhibits marked by Defendant

- NIL -

Sd/- G.Shiva Prasad Yadav

A.C.J (Sr.D)

OS/85/2024

L.N.Ramesh Babu S/o L.Ramakrishna vs Kodur Anil Kumar S/o K.Subash Chandra Bose

06 May 2026

OS.85/2024 1 A.C.J (Sr.D) Court, ATP Dt.06.05.2026

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR

DIVISION) :: ANANTHAPURAMU

Present :- Sri G.Shiva Prasad Yadav,

Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ananthapuramu.

Wednesday, this the 06th day of May, 2026

ORIGINAL SUIT No.85/2024

Between :

L.N.Ramesh Babu, S/o L.Ramakrishna, aged 55 years, Business, residing at

D.No.21/358, Old town, Ananthapuramu.

… Plaintiff

And.,

Kodur Anil Kumar, S/o K.Subash Chandra Bose, aged 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.11/183, Subash Road, Ananthapuramu Town.

… Defendant

This suit came on this day i.e. on 27.04.2026 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri B.Vijaya Kumar, Sri B.Sri Hari and

Smt.Anitha, Advocates for the plaintiff and of defendant remained exparte and having perused the entire material on record and having heard the learned counsel for the plaintiff and having stood over for consideration till this day the Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

1.This suit is filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery of suit claim i.e. Rs.33,98,662/- on the foot ‘A’ and ‘B’ marked promissory notes dt.09.12.2020 alleged to be executed by the defendant and award costs of the suit.

2. The brief averments of the plaint pleadings are that:

OS.85/2024 2 A.C.J (Sr.D) Court, ATP Dt.06.05.2026

The defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- in cash from the plaintiff on 09.12.2020 agreeing to repaythe same with interest at 24% per annum and executed ‘A’ marked promissory note in favour of the plaintiff on the same day itself. Again on the same day, the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- in cash from the plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum and executed ‘B’ marked promissory note in favour of the plaintiff. Inspite of demands made by the plaintiff, the defendant did not chose to pay any amount. Hence having no othergo this suit was filed.

3.Summons were ordered to the defendant. Summons served to the defendant through publication and could not appear before this court and remained exparte on 17.03.2026.

4.Heard the learned counsel for plaintiff.

5.Now point for consideration is

Whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of suit amount

from the defendant as prayed for?

6.During the course of trial, the plaintiff himself was examined as PW.1 and Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 are marked. Ex.A1 is ‘A’ marked promissory note dt.09.12.2020 for Rs.10,00,000/- executed by K.Anil Kumar in favour of plaintiff and Ex.A2 is ‘B’ marked promissory note dt.09.12.2020 for

Rs.10,00,000/- executed by K.Anil Kumar in favour of plaintiff.

No oral or documentary evidence adduced on behalf of the defendant.

Point:-

7.The contention of the plaintiff is that, the defendant borrowed a sum of

Rs.10,00,000/- and Rs.10,00,000/- on 09.12.2020 from the plaintiff and executed ‘A’ and ‘B’ marked promissory notes in favour of the plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum. Inspite of repeated demands, the defendant did not pay any amount. Hence having no othergo this suit was filed by the plaintiff.

OS.85/2024 3 A.C.J (Sr.D) Court, ATP Dt.06.05.2026

8. Since the suit was filed by the plaintiff against the defendant on the foot of promissory notes marked under Ex.A1 and Ex.A2, the burden lies upon the plaintiff to prove the same that defendant borrowed an amount of

Rs.20,00,000/- from the plaintiff and agreed to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum and failed to pay the amount. ,

For which, to prove the case, the plaintiff himself was examined as

PW.1, he categorically reiterating the pleadings in the plaint in his chief evidence and further he placed Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 which are suit promissory notes, Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 indicates that they are suit promissory notes alleged to have been executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff by receiving consideration of Rs.10,00,000/- under each promissory note agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum.

9.On the other hand, the defendant remained exparte without challenging the version of PW.1. The evidence of PW.1 coupled with Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 it concluded that the defendant took an amount of Rs.20,00,000/- from the plaintiff and executed Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 for Rs.10,00,000/- each promissory note and failed to make payment. In the aforesaid reasons, the plaintiff is entitled for the relief as sought. Accordingly, the point is answered.

10.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs for a sum of Rs.33,98,662/- with subsequent interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till the date of realization on the principal sum of Rs.10,00,000/- and

Rs.10,00,000/-.

Typed to my direct dictation to the Stenographer, corrected and

pronounced by me in Open Court this the 06th day of May, 2026.

Sd/- G.Shiva Prasad Yadav

Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ananthapuramu.

OS.85/2024 4 A.C.J (Sr.D) Court, ATP Dt.06.05.2026

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

Plaintiff: Defendant:

PW.1: L.N.Ramesh Babu (Plaintiff) - None -

Documents Marked by Plaintiff

Ex.A1:‘A’ marked promissory note dt.09.12.2020 for Rs.10,00,000/- executed by K.Anil Kumar in favour of plaintiff.

Ex.A2:‘B’ marked promissory note dt.09.12.2020 for Rs.10,00,000/- executed by K.Anil Kumar in favour of plaintiff.

Exhibits marked by Defendant

- NIL -

Sd/- G.Shiva Prasad Yadav

A.C.J (Sr.D)

OS/53/2023

K.Panduranga Reddy S/o Late K.Ramalinga Reddy vs K.Ranga Reddy S/o Late K.Ramalinga Reddy

27 Apr 2026

O.S.No 53 of 2023 1 A.C.J (Sr.D) Court, ATP Dt.27.04.2026

APAN020003532023

IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

ANANTHAPURAMU

Present :- Sri G. Shiva Prasad Yadav, Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ananthapuramu.

Monday, the 27th day of April, 2026

O.S.No.53/2023

Between:

1. K.Panduranga Reddy, S/o Late K.Ramalinga Reddy, aged about 52 years, Hindu, cultivation, residing at Door No.1-15, O.C. Colony,

Garudachedu Village, Kanekal Mandal, Anantapuramu Distrct.

2. K.Govinda Reddy, S/o late K.Ramalinga Reddy, aged about 46 years,

Hindu, cultivation, residing at 104, Sri Sai Sreenivasa Estates,

Vinayaka Nagar Road, No.1C, Hafeezpet, Miyapur, K.V.Ranga Reddy

District, Telangana State.

3. K.Radha, W/o Lakshminarayana Reddy, aged about 49 years, Hindu,

Housewife, residing at 303, K & T’s Shobha Nilayam, Near Muneswara

Temple, Tech City Layout, Bethadasanapura Road, Dodda Thoguru,

Electronic City Phase-1, Bengaluru, Karnataka State.

... Plaintiffs

Vs.

K.Ranga Reddy, S/o Late K.Ramalinga Reddy, aged about 55 years,

Hindu, cultivation, C/o Ranga Reddy, Ward No.22, 9th Cross, Left

Side Kappagal Road, Bellary, Karnataka State.

… Defendant

O.S.No 53 of 2023 2 A.C.J (Sr.D) Court, ATP Dt.27.04.2026

This suit is filed by the plaintiffs to pass a preliminary decree in favour of the plaintiffs and against the defendant and to declaring the plaintiffs 3/4th share in plaint schedule properties by way of final decree for partition and separate possession and enjoyment dividing into shares for allotment of four shares and allot 3/4th share to the plaintiffs and for costs of the suit.

This suit is coming on this day for hearing before me in the presence of Sri J.Chittaranjan, Advocate for the plaintiffs, defendant remained exparte, and this Court delivered the following judgment:-

JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs called absent. No representation. Inspite of sufficient opportunities, plaintiffs have not let in evidence. It appears plaintiffs have no interest to prosecute the case. Hence this suit is dismissed for non prosecution.

Pronounced by me in the open Court this the 27th day of April,

2026.

Sd/-G.Shiva Prasad Yadav,

Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ananthapuramu.

Appendix of evidence Witnesses examined for - Nil -

Sd/-G.Shiva Prasad Yadav,

A.C.J.(S.D)

OS/31/2023

J.Sreenivasa Rao S/o J.Ranga Rao vs M,.Sathyanarayana Reddy S/o M.Hanumantha Reddy

28 Apr 2026

O.S.No.31 of 2023 1 A.C.J (Sr.D) Court, ATP Dt.28.04.2026

APAN020002792023

IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

ANANTHAPURAMU

Present :- Sri G. Shiva Prasad Yadav, Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ananthapuramu.

Tuesday, the 28th day of April, 2026

O.S.No.31/2023

Between:

J.Sreenivasa Rao, S/o J.Ranga Rao, aged 50 years, Hindu, business, residing at D.No.28-271, Subhash Road, Ananthapuramu.

... Plaintiff

Vs.

M.Sathyanarayana Reddy, S/o M.Hanumantha Reddy, aged about 43 years, Hindu, residing at D.No.4-3-93, Janasathi Nagar,

Ananthapuramu.

… Defendant

This suit is filed by the plaintiff for recover of Rs.32,86,666/- and made up of A & B marked pronotes (Rs.16,94,000/- + and Rs.15,92,666/-) being the principal and interest executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff on 02.03.2020 ‘A’ marked pronote for Rs.10,00,000/-, on 04.08.2020 and on ‘B’ marked pronote for Rs.10,00,000/- pronotes respectively agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and claimed at the same rate as the defendant is not an agriculturist and for costs of the suit.

O.S.No.31 of 2023 2 A.C.J (Sr.D) Court, ATP Dt.28.04.2026

This suit is coming on this day for hearing before me in the presence of Sri C.Raghurama Reddy and Sri C.Ashok Kumar Reddy, Advocates for the plaintiff and of Sri.B.Vijaya Kumar, Advocate for the defendant, and this Court delivered the following judgment:-

JUDGMENT

Cost not paid. PW1 called absent. No representation. Inspite of sufficient opportunities, PW1 did not turn up to face cross examination.

Hence chief of PW1 is eschewed. Suit is dismissed for non prosecution.

Pronounced by me in the open Court this the 28th day of April,

2026.

Sd/-G.Shiva Prasad Yadav,

Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ananthapuramu.

Appendix of evidence Witnesses examined for Plaintiff: Defendant: PW.1 : J.Sreenivasa Rao (Eschewed) -Nil-

Exhibits marked for Plaintiff:

Ex.A1 : Original suit promissory note dt.02.03.2020 for Rs.10,00,000/- Ex.A2 : Original suit promissory note dt.04.08.2020 for Rs.10,00,000/-

Exhibits marked for Defendant: - Nil -

Sd/-G.Shiva Prasad Yadav,

A.C.J.(S.D)

Order Record 815 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
H.M.O.P/71/2026	Yenumula Nagaraju S/o Y.Nagendra vs Yenumula Vennela alias D.Vennela W/o Y.Nagaraju	08 May 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/376/2025	Pothu Haritha vs Nil	08 May 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/66/2026	B.Bharathi W/o M.Madhukiran vs M.Madhu Kiran S/o M.Sreenivasulu	07 May 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/241/2025	A.Aswani W/o Loknath vs A.Loknath S/o Narayanaswami	07 May 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/313/2023	Kalikatti Chinna Kadiraiah @ Chinna Kadirappa S/o. Late K. Narayana vs Lakshminarasamma @ Anjali W/o. K.Chinna Kadiraiah @ Chinna Kadirappa	07 May 2026	Copy of Order	—
IP/1/2024	Balija Venkataramana S/o. Late Balija Lakshminarasappa vs M. Jaya Prasad S/o. Venkataramana	06 May 2026	Copy of Order	—
IP/11/2023	N.Nagalakshmi vs N.T.Thipeswamy	06 May 2026	Copy of Order	—
OS/85/2024	L.N.Ramesh Babu S/o L.Ramakrishna vs Kodur Anil Kumar S/o K.Subash Chandra Bose	06 May 2026	Copy of Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/162/2021	D.K.Thippeswamy vs K.Pushpavathi	06 May 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/78/2023	Chandamuru Sujitha @ Sujatha vs Chukka Amarnath Reddy	05 May 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/81/2026	Katika Gangadhar S/o.Katika Sreenivasulu vs Vsxxx	05 May 2026	Copy of Order	—
IP/97/2022	K.Rajagopal S/o K.Ramappa vs S.Siva Reddy S/o S.Narsi Reddy	04 May 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/58/2026	M.Dharani vs M.Bhargava	04 May 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/304/2025	Mangala Pamidi Keerthi alias Keerthi W/o.Mangala Jagadish D/o.Mangala Prasad vs Vsxxx	04 May 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/57/2026	Smt.K.Uma vs Nil	01 May 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/252/2025	Mangala Suvarna W/o. Mangala Venkatesu vs Nil	01 May 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/274/2023	H.T. Madhuri W/o. Rama Krishna vs Sheelam Ramakrishna S/o. Sheelam Upendar	01 May 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/277/2025	Nara Prasanth S/o.Nara Rajanna vs Vsxxx	01 May 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/309/2025	Tapala Shashivardhan S/o.Tapala Katamaiah vs Vsxxx	01 May 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/346/2025	Sake Ganesh vs Nil	01 May 2026	Copy of Order	—
OS/31/2023	J.Sreenivasa Rao S/o J.Ranga Rao vs M,.Sathyanarayana Reddy S/o M.Hanumantha Reddy	28 Apr 2026	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/87/2024	Modupalli Venkataswamy S/o Modupalli Narayanappa vs D.Sreeramulu S/o D.Narayana	28 Apr 2026	Copy of Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/8/2023	Doddappagari Muthyalamma vs Doddappagari SuryaNarayana	28 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/156/2022	Buddareddygari Obi Reddy vs Bitasandram Revathi @ Lakshmi	28 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
OS/53/2023	K.Panduranga Reddy S/o Late K.Ramalinga Reddy vs K.Ranga Reddy S/o Late K.Ramalinga Reddy	27 Apr 2026	Copy of Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/158/2023	Ediga Dhanunjaya S/o. Ediga Ramanjineyulu vs E. Umadevi @ Vani, W/o. Ediga Danunjaya	27 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/299/2022	Avula Ashok Kumar vs K.Prabhavathi @ A.Prabhavathi	27 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/303/2025	Pujari Lakshmi Narayana S/o.Late P.Ganganna vs Pujari Uha W/o.Pujari Lakshmi Narayana D/o.S.Chinna Dandolappa	27 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
OS/350/2018	D. Indiramma vs Madela Suseelamma	24 Apr 2026	Copy of Judgment	—
IP/71/2022	Gangireddygari Narasimha Reddy S/o late Narayana Reddy vs Harijana Akkulappa S/o M.Ankamma	23 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
IP/36/2023	Mekala Vijay Krisnna S/o Mekala Ramadasu vs T.Raju S/o T.Pakkerappa	22 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
OS/493/2013	G.Pothulaiah vs N.Chandra Viswanath	22 Apr 2026	Copy of Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/67/2026	Kadavakola Suguna W/o Chakali Sreekanth vs Nil	22 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/97/2026	Pothula Prathyusha W/o.Golla Bala Harikrishna D/o.Golla Narasimhulu vs Vsxxx	22 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/233/2024	Mandhala Chitti W/o. M. Ravi vs M. Ravi S/o. Mandala Adinarayana	22 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/333/2024	Ragini Yashoda ,W/o.E.Anil Kumar vs E.Anil Kumar,S/o.E.Ramanjinappa,	22 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
IP/30/2025	Reddy Nagaraju vs J.Ramanjineyulu	21 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
IP/61/2024	Md.Keefayathulla Baig S/o Shafayathulla Baig vs Kondapuram Sudhakar Reddy	21 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/73/2026	Palegar Naga Shravani alias Chamundeswari W/o.B.Purushotham Raju alias Vinay D/o.Ramanjaneyulu vs B.Purushotham Raju alias Vijay S/o.P.Babu Raju	21 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/354/2025	H. Narendra vs H.Shivamma	21 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/384/2024	Rasaputra Roohi Bai,W/o.Siva Krishna Singh,D/o.Smt Saamraajya Lakshmi ,S.M.BashaS.M.Basha vs R.Siva Krishna Singh,S/o.Late Rasaputhra Hari Ram Singh	21 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
IP/7/2020	P. Naresh S/o P. Sudakar vs H.Ravindra Reddy	20 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
IP/51/2025	Chela Ramanna S/o Late Chela Pedda Vannappa vs Tharapuram Yerrappa Gowd S/o T.Virupakshappa and other	20 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
IP/91/2024	S.Mahaboob Peera vs B.Krishna	20 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
OS/520/2018	B.Surya Mohan Reddy vs Kalapuram Nallamma	16 Apr 2026	Copy of Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/10/2025	Karamthoti Raveendra Naik,S/o.Dake Naik vs Palithya Sailaja alias P. Sailajabai,W/o.k. Raveendra Naik,D/o.late P.Thirupal Naik	16 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/171/2019	Smt. Bandaru Sai Leela vs Mahesh Kumar	16 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/328/2025	Sri H.Rangaswamy S/o.Sri Harijana Joshaf vs Vsxxx	16 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
OS/88/2018	State Bank of India Rep. By its Manager, Narpala Branch vs N.Kullayappa	15 Apr 2026	Copy of Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/294/2025	Nagaraju alias Talari Nagaraju S/o.Seenappa alias Talari Seenappa vs Bharathi alias T.Bharathi D/o.M.Basanna W/o.Nagaraju alias Talari Nagaraju	15 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
OS/460/2017	I. Vijay Kumar vs B. Rajamma	09 Apr 2026	Copy of Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/314/2024	Ramavath Ramanji Naik,S/o.Ramavath Jayaram Naik. vs Palthya Venkata Lakshmi,W/o.Ramavath Ramanji Naik	09 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
SC/80/2023	State Rep by Sub-Inspector of Police, Gummagatta P.S., vs Kuruba Hemanth	08 Apr 2026	Copy of Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/44/2025	Golla Roja ,W/o.Golla Siva Prasad vs Golla Siva Prasad,S/o.Venkata Narayana.	08 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/150/2022	Gade Nagalakshmi vs Kommineni Bhanu Prakash @ Jagadeesh	08 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/201/2025	PAtragolla rajitha W/o Cheemala Ravi Yadav vs Cheemala Ravi Yadav S/o Cheemala Doddappa	08 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/318/2025	Gujjala Yeswanth S/o.G.Bommanna vs Smt.G.Gayathri W/o.Gujjala Yeswanth D/o.Sake Venkatesulu	08 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/356/2025	J.Naveen Kumar vs N.Sravani alias Nandini	08 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/237/2025	Mallepula Kiran S/o M. Chandrasekhar vs Nil	07 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
OS/73/2023	Golla Padma w/o G.Gurappa vs K.Naredra Ratna Prasad S/o B.Krishnamurthy	06 Apr 2026	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/162/2018	Andhra bank, Rep by it's chief Manager, Ramnagar, Anantapur vs Chilakam Hariscchandra Reddy	06 Apr 2026	Copy of Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/7/2026	Yenumula Murali vs Yenumula Nagaveni	06 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/24/2025	Sake Suresh ,S/o.Subbarayudu vs Sake Venkata Ramanamma ,W/o.Sake Suresh,D/o.Naganna	06 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/56/2026	M.Suresh Naik vs R.Salu Bai	06 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/117/2019	Bestha Suresh vs G.Raja Kala	06 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/187/2019	Napa Venkatesulu vs Smt.Ramya	06 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/291/2025	Gowthami W/o.Bhargava D/o.Late Valmiki Dhanunjaya vs Vsxxx	06 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
OS/155/2024	chakali Suvarnamma vs T.Imam Vali	02 Apr 2026	Copy of Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/4/2026	Kammara Naresh vs Kammara Vanitha	02 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/51/2026	Jarabandi Nese Yerriswamy alias J.Yerriswamy vs Smt. P.D.Vasanthi	02 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/53/2026	Neeruganti Neelavathi vs Angajala Narendra	02 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/119/2025	Kamurthy Thulasi W/o. S. Ganesh vs S. Ganesh S/o. S. Basavaraju	02 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/176/2025	P.Rajeswari W/O Bestharasi Sreeramulu vs Betharasi Sreeramulu S/o Pullanna	02 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/262/2025	Narpala Priyanka alias Lakshmi Priyanka W/o.Bommaka Pratap Reddy D/o.Late Narpala Rammohan Reddy vs Vsxx	02 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/263/2025	Devanapalli Nikhil Reddy S/o.Devanapalli Chandrasekhar Reddy vs Vsxx	02 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/364/2025	Golla Arunamma vs Bandari Aalli Maaya	02 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/369/2025	B.K.Ramakrishna Reddy vs Sandhya	02 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
IP/79/2023	Erikala Ramanjineyulu S/o late E.Venkatanna vs G.Vijay S/o G.Ganganna	01 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/74/2021	Chigureu Vani Naidu vs Madiga Chithappa	01 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/212/2025	Derangala Jyothi W/O Y. Ramanjineyulu vs Y.Ramanjineyulu S/o Y. Ganga raju	01 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/246/2023	Gujjala Veera Nataraj S/o. Latte Gujjala Nallappa vs Y. Sravani W/o. Gujjala Veeranataraju	01 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/297/2025	Pandiripalli Jayanthi W/o.Chitra Sreenivasulu D/o.P.Ayyappa Reddy vs Vsxx	01 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/393/2025	Karamthot Pravallika vs M.Ramanna Naik	01 Apr 2026	Copy of Order	—
OS/258/2017	Mulakatalla Nagi Reddy vs M.Ananthamma	31 Mar 2026	Copy of Judgment	—
SC/207/2025	State S.H.O. Anantapuramu III Town P.S. Rep By P.P. Anantapuramu vs Neeru Shikari Anusingh alias Sankar alias Pappu A.2.	31 Mar 2026	Copy of Judgment	—
IP/48/2022	Byggari Ram GoplaReddy S/o B. Aswartha Reddy vs B.Jaya Prakash Reddy S/o M.Krishna Reddy	30 Mar 2026	Copy of Order	—
OS/370/2018	S.Mahaboob Peera vs P.Govinda Reddy	30 Mar 2026	Copy of Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/284/2025	M.Eranna alias Harijana Eranna S/o.Late Yellappa vs M.Deveeramma W/o.Eranna D/o.Late Thippeswamy	30 Mar 2026	Copy of Order	—
H.M.O.P/348/2025	Virupapalli Bhaskar vs B.Aswini	30 Mar 2026	Copy of Order	—
EP/152/2015	MS CHALAPATHI CHIT FUND ATP vs K.MADHUKAR SAM	26 Mar 2026	Copy of Order	—
EP/484/2015	Merugu Hari Prarasad vs Gundlamadugu Chinna Varadanna	25 Mar 2026	Copy of Order	—
IP/73/2022	D.Lakshmi Reddy S/o Narayana Reddy vs Venkata Giri Babu S/o	25 Mar 2026	Copy of Order	—
OS/137/2023	Smt. K.Bhagya Lakshmi W/o K.V.Sreenivasulu vs N.Murali Krishna S/o N.Subba Rao	25 Mar 2026	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/402/2015	R.Dhansekahr aged 45 years vs P.Venugopal aged 66 years	25 Mar 2026	Copy of Judgment	—
IP/68/2016	Vadde gangappa vs V.Thimmappa	24 Mar 2026	Copy of Order	—
IP/71/2024	K.Ravi Kumar S/o K.Thimappa vs TVS PMKR Bike Service, Rep by Manager	24 Mar 2026	Copy of Order	—
OS/14/2017	Kamatham Narayana Swamy vs P.Amarnath	24 Mar 2026	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/16/2017	A.Padmavathi vs P.Amarnath	24 Mar 2026	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/18/2017	C.Ramanjulamma vs P.Amarnath	24 Mar 2026	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/20/2017	C.Prasanna Lakshmi vs P.Amarnath	24 Mar 2026	Copy of Judgment	—

Showing 100 of 815 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

May 2026		20
Apr 2026		63
Mar 2026		63
Feb 2026		54
Jan 2026		48
Dec 2025		56
Nov 2025		67
Oct 2025		70
Sep 2025		97
Aug 2025		76
Jul 2025		97
Jun 2025		77

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has G.SHIVA PRASAD YADAV handled?

G.SHIVA PRASAD YADAV has handled 833 court orders since 2025 at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District). The average disposal rate is 64 orders per month.

What types of cases does G.SHIVA PRASAD YADAV hear?

Based on available records, G.SHIVA PRASAD YADAV primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Sessions Cases) at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District).

Where is G.SHIVA PRASAD YADAV currently posted?

G.SHIVA PRASAD YADAV is posted as Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Anantapur at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District), Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by G.SHIVA PRASAD YADAV available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by G.SHIVA PRASAD YADAV are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does G.SHIVA PRASAD YADAV dispose cases?

G.SHIVA PRASAD YADAV disposes approximately 64 cases per month, based on 833 orders handled over their tenure at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District).

Since when is G.SHIVA PRASAD YADAV serving?

G.SHIVA PRASAD YADAV has been serving at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District) since 2025. and is currently posted there.

Case Types

H 53%

IP 24%

OS 18%

SC 3%

EP 2%

Posting History

Apr 2025 — Present

Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Anantapur · 833 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Sri. E Bhima Rao

Principal District and Sessions Judge

1,187 orders

Smt. C. Satya Vani

I Addl. District Judge

0 orders

Sri D. Ramulu IIADJ

II Addl. District Judge

0 orders

Smt N Satyasri

III Addl. District Judge

0 orders

B.babu Naik

IV Addl. District Judge

3 orders

T.kesava

SC/ST Court Cum Addl. District Judge

19 orders

Sri G Sridevi

Chairman Cum Labor Court, Anantapur

185 orders

Sri C.N.Murthy

VII ADJ - Cum - Judge Family Court

0 orders

Smt A Padma

Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Anantapur

635 orders

Sri K Bala Koteswara Rao

Principal Junior Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistra...

1,158 orders

Smt. Harika Ravuri

I Addl.Junior Civil Judge Cum I Addl. Judl. Magist...

704 orders

D. Pavani

Spl.JFCM Mobile for trial of cases under PCR Act C...

41 orders

← View all judges at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District)