Smt. Himabindhu Mudavath

Prl. Junior Civil Judge -cum- Judicial Magistrate of First Class Rajanna Sircilla

Rajanna Sircilla, PDJ Court Complex · Rajanna Siricilla · Telangana

Smt. Himabindhu Mudavath, Prl. Junior Civil Judge -cum- Judicial Magistrate of First Class Rajanna Sircilla, is posted at Rajanna Sircilla, PDJ Court Complex, Rajanna Siricilla, Telangana, India. 564 court orders on record since 2023. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CC, OS, STC cases.

564

Total Orders

Judgments

143

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

OS/71/2013

BHUKYA RAMULU vs MALOTHU RAJU

26 Sep 2023

OS 71 of 2013 1

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

AT, RAJANNA SIRCILLA.

Present: SMT. M.HIMA BINDU.

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Rajanna Sircilla.

Tuesday, the 26th day of September, 2023

Original Suit No.71 of 2013

Between: Bhookya Ramulu, S/o Chandrabhan, age: 55 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Vattimalla V/o Konaraopet Mandal Revenue.

…Plaintiff

// A N D //

1.Malothu Raju, S/o Dharma, age: 45 years,

2.Malothu Ravi, S/o Raju, age: 25years,

3.Malothu Thirupathi, S/o Raju, age: 20 years,

All are R/o H.No.6-60, Vattimalla V/o Konaraopet Mandal, Karimnagar District.

...Defendants

This suit is coming before me on 05.09.2023 for final hearing in the presence of Sri Ch.Mahesh Goud, Advocate for the Plaintiff and Sri K.Laxman, Advocate for defendants and having been heard and having stood over for consideration, the Court delivered the following:

:: J U D G M E N T ::

This suit is filed by the plaintiff against the defendants 1 to 3, for perpetual injunction, restraining the defendants, their family members, agents, supporters, workmen, etc., from entering into and interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over his open place to an extent of Ac.0-04 guntas in survey

OS 71 of 2013 2

No.211/63along with temporary cattle shed therein, which is the part of total area of Ac.2-20 guntas, situated at Vattimalla Village of

Konaraopet Mandal, as bounded hereunder:

East-Canal West-The remaining open place and houses of the plaintiff. North-Road South-Land of Bhookya Gangaram.

which is hereinafter called “suit schedule land.” 2.1.The brief facts of the plaint are that the plaintiff is the owner in possession of suit schedule land. The plaintiff submits that the

Government of Andhra Pradesh assigned the land to an extent of Ac.2- 20 guntas in suit survey No.211/63 to the plaintiff long ago, then, the name of the plaintiff has been recorded in revenue records and he was issued title deed passbook and pattadar passbook in respect of the total extent of Ac.2-20 guntas in suit survey number, and the suit schedule land is the part and parcel of that total area, as stated above, that the plaintiff constructed RCC building bearing house No.6-60 in the name of his late mother by name Bhookya Puri in the above said land, that the plaintiff is in peaceful possession, occupation and enjoyment of the entire area of Ac.2-20 guntas including the above said two houses and the suit schedule land. The plaintiff submits that

OS 71 of 2013 3

he deposited his original title deed passbook with the banker and obtained loan and the plaintiff filed the documents.

2.2.The plaintiff submits that the defendants are the strangers to the suit schedule land and they have no right over it and they developed ill-intention against the plaintiff in order to occupy the same and that they are causing illegal interference with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the suit schedule land and finally on 10.05.2013, the defendants came to the suit schedule land and tried to occupy the same by dispossessing the plaintiff therefrom, but the plaintiff resisted their illegal acts. Hence the suit.

3.The counsel for the defendant Nos.1 and 2 filed written statement by adopting the defendant No.3, on their behalf, by denying all allegations made in the plaint averred. They contended that the plaintiff is not the owner in possession of open place of Ac.0-04 guntas in survey No.211/63 along with temporary cattle shed existed therein, which is the part and parcel of total area of Ac.2-20 guntas, as discussed in the plaint by the plaintiff and in the above said land of the plaintiff, there are no houses and cattle shed as alleged by the plaintiff and further the land of the plaintiff is an agricultural land and no structures are found on the spot. They contended that the plaintiff and his mother late Bhookya Puri sold the land measuring

OS 71 of 2013 4

Ac.0-05 guntas, situated at Vattimalla village of Konaraopet Mandal on 09.11.1993 for consideration of Rs.650/- per guntas to the defendant No.1 and the said plaintiff and his mother after having received the entire sale consideration from the defendant No.1, delivered vacant possession of the said land to the defendant No.1, since then, the defendant No.1 is in peaceful possession, occupation and enjoyment of the said land, later, the defendant No.1 constructed a cattle shed therein and the plaintiff with an ill-intention to occupy the above said land of the defendant No.1, filed the above suit with false allegations and he has to come to the court with unclean hands, hence, prays to dismiss the suit.

4.Basing on the above pleadings, the following issues are framed:

1.Whether the plaintiff is in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property, as on the date of filing of the suit or not?

2.Whether the plaintiff is entitled for relief of perpetual injunction, as prayed for?

3.To what relief?

5.During the course of trial, the plaintiff is examined as PW.1 and got marked Ex.A.1 to Ex.A.17. On behalf of the plaintiff, one

Lakavath Roopsingh is examined himself as PW3.

6.Heard both sides and perused the record.

OS 71 of 2013 5

7.ISSUE NOS.1 & 2:

8.Since these two reliefs are interrelated, as such they are answered jointly.

9.When the chief-examination-affidavit of PW1 was eschewed, after hearing the counsel for plaintiff and after closure of chief of PW1, the cross-examination of PW1 was treated as nil and the chief- examination of PW2 was returned. Thus, the only evidence available

before the court is of PW3.

10.According to the chief-examination-affidavit of PW3 is that his evidence is supported to the case of plaintiff in respect of suit schedule land. In cross-examination, PW3 deposed that the present suit was filed by the plaintiff against the defendants 1 to 3 for the land to an extent of Ac.2-20 guntas. He deposed that the plaintiff raised paddy crop in the land to an extent of Ac.2-20 guntas and that he knows and deposes the boundaries of the same, as mentioned in the suit schedule land. He further deposed that for the above mentioned suit schedule land has the water source through the bore-well, for which there is an electricity service connection for the said land, but, he does not know the number of it.

OS 71 of 2013 6

11.On the other hand, the defendants 1 to 3 filed written statement denying the allegations made in the plaintiff by the plaintiff, but, they being the strangers to the suit land, did not choose to file chief- examination affidavit nor contest the suit. More-over, the defendants are the strangers to the suit land and the suit land was assigned to the plaintiff by the Government of Andhra Pradesh, therefore, the defendants have no right to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the same. Though the chief of PW1 is eschewed and evidence of PW2 returned and no document got marked on behalfof the plaintiff by any witness, but the evidence of PW3 is supported the view of plaintiff and also supported that the plaintiff is raising paddy crop in the agricultural land to an extent of Ac.2-20 guntas with the source of bore-well water with an electricity service connection.

Therefore, the suit schedule land is the part of total area of Ac.2-20 guntas. It is a well settled law as per Specific Relief Act that the strangers have no right to interfere in terms of dispossession of the land of anyone else. Moreover, it was the land assigned to the plaintiff by the Government of Andhra Pradesh. The defendants also failed to file any piece of paper to show that the suit schedule land is standing in the names of plaintiff as well as his mother.

OS 71 of 2013 7

12.In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the prima facie possession is proved in favour of the plaintiff through the evidence of PW3 and the defendants failed to adduce any evidence either oral or documentary, therefore, this court holds that the plaintiff is entitled for the relief of perpetual injunction, as he is in lawful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule land, as on the date of filing of the suit. Accordingly, the issue Nos.1 and 2 are accepted in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants.

13. ISSUE NO.3:

In the result, the suit is decreed in favour of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants, their family members, agents, supporters, workmen, etc., from entering into and interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over his open place bearing survey No.211/63 measuring Ac.0-04 guntas along with temporary cattle shed therein, which is the part of total area Ac.2-20 guntas, situated at Vattimalla village of Konaraopet Mandal, by way of perpetual injunction. With no costs.

Typed to my dictation, seen, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 26th day of September, 2023.

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Rajanna Sircilla.

OS 71 of 2013 8

:APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE:

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR THE PLAINTIFF: FOR THE DEFENDANTS:

PW1: Bhookya Ramulu (Eschewed) -None- PW2: Chief-Affidavit returned. PW3: Lakavath Roopsingh.

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR THE PLAINTIFF: Ex.A1Original pattadar passbook of plaintiff.

Ex.A2CC of pahani for the year 1997-1998.

Ex.A3CC of pahani for the year 1998-1999.

Ex.A4CC of pahani for the year 1999-2000.

Ex.A5CC of pahani for the year 2001-2002.

Ex.A6CC of pahani for the year 2002-2003.

Ex.A7CC of pahani for the year 2003-2004.

Ex.A8CC of pahani for the year 2004-2005.

Ex.A9CC of pahani for the year 2006-2007.

Ex.A10CC of pahani for the year 2007-2008.

Ex.A11CC of pahani for the year 2008-2009.

Ex.A12CC of pahani for the year 2009-2010.

Ex.A13Computerized pahani for the Fasli year 1420 obtained from Mee-Seva.

Ex.A14Original ownership certificate, dated 13;05.2013, issued in favour of PW1.

Ex.A15Original ownership certificate, dated 13.05.2013 issued in favour of Bhukya Poori, W/o late Chandrabhan.

Ex.A16House tax payment receipt for the year 2012-2013, dated 07.05.2013 pertaining to the House No.6-54.

Ex.A17House tax payment receipt for the year 2012-2013, dated 28.04.2013 pertaining to the H.No.6-55. FOR THE DEFENDANTS: -Nil-

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Rajanna Sircilla.

OS/108/2023

Pochamma Temple, S.C. Colony, represented by its president Eluri Narsaiah. vs Gaddi Narsaiah

27 Sep 2023

Page-1 of 6O.S.No. 108 of 2023

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

AT, RAJANNA SIRCILLA.

Present: SMT. M.HIMABINDU

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Rajanna Sircilla.

Wednesday, the 27th day of September, 2023

Original Suit No.108 of 2023

Between: Pochamma Temple, SC Colony, Racharla Boppapur Village of Yellareddypet Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District, R/by its President, Eluri Narsaiah, S/o Lingaiah, age: 66 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o H.No.1-84, Racharla Boppapur village of Yellareddypet Mandal of Rajanna Sircilla District. …Plaintiff

// A N D //

1.Gaddi Narsaiah, S/o Narayana, age: 50 years, Occ: Agriculture,

2.Gaddi Vasantha, W/o Sathyam, age: 35 years, Occ: Agriculture,

3.Gaddi Santhosh, S/o Narayana, age: 35 years, Occ: Agriculture,

All are R/o Racharla Boppapur V/o Yellareddypet Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District.

...Defendants

This suit is coming before me on 21.09.2023 for final hearing in the presence of Sri K.Venkat Reddy, learned Advocate for the Plaintiff and the defendants 1 to 3 remained ex-parte, having been heard and having stood over for consideration, the Court delivered the following:

:: J U D G M E N T ::

This is a suit filed by the plaintiff/President of Pochamma Temple against the defendant Nos.1 to 3 seeking perpetual injunction, restraining the defendants, their family members, agents, workmen and supporters from entering into and interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff/Pochamma Temple with open place, total area of 242 square yards in

Page- 2 of 6 O.S.No.108 of 2023 survey No.107A/2 (Old survey No.107A), situated at Boppapur village of

Yellareddypet Mandal of Rajanna Sircilla District, as bounded hereunder:

North-Open place of Jangam Chilukavva & Jangam Lingavva South-Open place of the defendants. East-Open place of Bathula Shankaravva. West-Open place of the defendants which is hereinafter called the “suit schedule property.”

2.The case of the plaintiff/President of Pochamma Temple, who represented on its behalf, in brief is that the said President is the owner and possessor of its temple with open place, as stated above, that the open place covered by the suit schedule property which he/the President purchased the suit schedule property from Gaddi Narsaiah, S/o Narsaiah, R/o Racharla

Boppapur village, after having received sale consideration from the said

President, the vendor executed a registered sale deed bearing document

No.2000 of 2020, dated 20.02.2020 in favor of the plaintiff by delivering the vacant possession of the open place covered by the suit schedule property to the plaintiff, then, the name of the plaintiff was recorded in revenue records concerned in respect of the open place of the suit schedule property under

NALA, that the name of the plaintiff still appears in revenue records concerned

I.e.., Dharani records in respect of the open place of the suit schedule property, that thereafter, the said President started collecting funds from the

Page-3 of 6O.S.No. 108 of 2023 votaries, constructed Pochamma Temple in the above said property, which is covered therein and to prove the same, the plaintiff filed the documents.

The plaintiff submits that the defendants have no right over the suit schedule property and they have lands towards south and west sides of the suit schedule property and that they developed ill-intention to occupy the suit schedule property, but the plaintiff resisted their illegal acts and finally the defendants came to the said place and tried to occupy the same by dispossessing the plaintiff from the suit schedule property but the President of the Temple and its Members resisted the illegal acts of the defendants and remained in possession thereof. Hence the suit.

3.The defendant Nos.1 to 3 called absent in spite of service of summons on them, hence service of summons on them held sufficient and they were remained ex parte.

4.The plaintiff is examined himself as PW1 and got marked Ex.A.1 to A5 and his behalf one Neerati Rajam was examined as PW2 and one Kotha

Prasad was examined as PW3, but no documents were marked through them.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the plaintiff.

6.Now the point for determination is:

Whether the suit can be decreed, as prayed for?

POINT:

7.The plaintiff as PW1/President of Pochamma Temple in his chief- affidavit has reiterated the averments of the plaint. He got marked Ex.A.1-

Page- 4 of 6 O.S.No.108 of 2023

Original registered sale deed bearing document No.2000 of 2020, dated 20.02.2020, Ex.A2-Dharani land details search, Ex.A.3-third party affidavit of

Kotha Narsaiah, Ex.A4-Third party affidavit of Bathula Narayana and Ex.A5-

Original Society Members Agenda, dated 06.03.2023. A perusal of the above documents, it clearly shows that the plaintiff/Pochamma Temple is in lawful possession of the suit schedule property, as on the date of filing of the suit.

Further, the oral evidence of PW1 is clear to the extent that the defendants were interfering with his/plaintiff peaceful possession and enjoyment of the above property. It is also clearly established through the above documentary evidence stating that the President of the said Pochamma Temple/being plaintiff, purchased the suit schedule property from Gaddi Narsaiah, S/o

Narsaiah, R/o Racharla Boppapur village, after having received sale consideration from the said President, the vendor executed a registered sale deed bearing document No.2000 of 2020, dated 20.02.2020 in favor of the plaintiff by delivering the vacant possession of the open place covered by the suit schedule property to the plaintiff, then, the name of the plaintiff was recorded in revenue records concerned in respect of the open place of the suit schedule property under NALA, that the name of the plaintiff still appears in revenue records concerned I.e.., Dharani records in respect of the open place of the suit schedule property and PWs 2 and 3 also supported the same. The above oral and documentary evidence is adduced on behalf of the plaintiff was

Page-5 of 6O.S.No. 108 of 2023 not challenged by the defendants as they remain ex parte. Hence, prima facie case shows that the plaintiff is in continuous possession of the suit schedule property, with metes and bounds, as stated supra and therefore, the plaintiff is entitled for the relief(s) as claimed by him. The point is answered accordingly.

8.In the result, the suit is decreed in favour of the plaintiff/President of the

Pochamma Temple and against the defendants 1 to 3, restraining the defendants, their family members, agents, workmen and supporters from entering into and interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff/Pochamma Temple with open place, total area of 242 square yards in survey No.107A/2 (Old survey No.107A), situated at Boppapur village of

Yellareddypet Mandal of Rajanna Sircilla District, by way of perpetual injunction. There is no order as to costs.

Typed to my dictation, seen, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 27th day of September, 2023.

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Rajanna Sircilla.

:APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE:

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR THE PLAINTIFF: FOR THE DEFENDANTS: PW1: Eluri Narsaiah. -None- PW2: Neerati Rajam. PW3: Kotha Prasad.

Page- 6 of 6 O.S.No.108 of 2023

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR THE PLAINTIFF: Ex.A1Original registered sale deed bearing document No.2000 of 2020, dated 20.02.2020

Ex.A2Dharani land details search.

Ex.A3Third party affidavit of Kotha Narsaiah.

Ex.A4Third party affidavit of Bathula Narayana.

Ex.A5Original Society members Agenda, dated: 06.03.2023.

FOR THE DEFENDANTS: - NIL -

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Rajanna Sircilla.

OS/108/2023

Pochamma Temple, S.C. Colony, represented by its president Eluri Narsaiah. vs Gaddi Narsaiah

27 Sep 2023

OS/71/2013

BHUKYA RAMULU vs MALOTHU RAJU

26 Sep 2023

EP/1/2023

Vadiyala Lachi reddy vs Ragati Mallaiah

27 Sep 2023

Order Record 562 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
EP/1/2023	Vadiyala Lachi reddy vs Ragati Mallaiah	27 Sep 2023	Other	—
OS/108/2023	Pochamma Temple, S.C. Colony, represented by its president Eluri Narsaiah. vs Gaddi Narsaiah	27 Sep 2023	Judgement	—
OS/108/2023	Pochamma Temple, S.C. Colony, represented by its president Eluri Narsaiah. vs Gaddi Narsaiah	27 Sep 2023	Other	—
OS/71/2013	BHUKYA RAMULU vs MALOTHU RAJU	26 Sep 2023	Other	—
OS/71/2013	BHUKYA RAMULU vs MALOTHU RAJU	26 Sep 2023	Judgement	—
CC/534/2016	Kasthuri Anil vs Gaddam @ Banglakadi Narayana @ Laxminarayana	26 Sep 2023	Judgement	—
CC/534/2016	Kasthuri Anil vs Gaddam @ Banglakadi Narayana @ Laxminarayana	26 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/547/2023	State of Telangana vs Padiga Lachaiah	26 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/547/2023	State of Telangana vs Padiga Lachaiah	26 Sep 2023	Judgement	—
CC/548/2023	State of Telangana vs Padiga Lachaiah	26 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/548/2023	State of Telangana vs Padiga Lachaiah	26 Sep 2023	Judgement	—
CC/710/2019	Potlapalli Nalini vs Asari Venkatesham	26 Sep 2023	Other	—
PRC/31/2023	State of Telangana vs Vskodithela srinivas	26 Sep 2023	Other	—
PRC/35/2023	State of Telangana vs Lingaiah Gattu	26 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/280/2023	State of Telangana vs Arukala Sathyam Alias Vaddepalli Satyam	25 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/280/2023	State of Telangana vs Arukala Sathyam Alias Vaddepalli Satyam	25 Sep 2023	Judgement	—
CC/351/2019	Vemula Ganesh vs Kattela Ramulu	25 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/355/2017	M. Ramesh, Tahsildar of Musthabad vs A1-Nimma Bal Reddy	25 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/355/2017	M. Ramesh, Tahsildar of Musthabad vs A1-Nimma Bal Reddy	25 Sep 2023	Judgement	—
CC/1164/2022	State of Telangana vs Arukala Sathyam Alias Vaddepalli Satyam	25 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/1164/2022	State of Telangana vs Arukala Sathyam Alias Vaddepalli Satyam	25 Sep 2023	Judgement	—
CC/1296/2023	State of Telangana vs Phani Hari Babu	25 Sep 2023	Other	—
PRC/33/2023	State of Telangana vs Suthram Karanakar	25 Sep 2023	Other	—
PRC/34/2023	SHO PS Thangallapalli vs Danaveni Papaiah	25 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/1321/2022	State of Telangana vs Thadaka Srihari	23 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/460/2022	State of Telangana vs Bhukya Srinivas	20 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/690/2022	State of Telangana vs ERAVELLI NAGARAJU	20 Sep 2023	Other	—
OS/467/2022	Buram Kistaiah vs Buram Prathyusha	19 Sep 2023	Judgement	—
CC/208/2021	Pathipaka Satyanarayana vs Subhanandini Chit Funds Pvt. Ltd	19 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/534/2019	Geesa Srinivas vs Thaduri Srinivas	19 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/692/2022	State of Telangana vs ENDRA MANI	19 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/1055/2023	State of Telangana vs Sai Kumar Sandu	19 Sep 2023	Other	—
STC/16/2023	State of Telangana vs Rodda raju	19 Sep 2023	Other	—
STC-NI/44/2022	Pathipaka Satyanarayana vs Roopasri Associates Sricilla r/by its proprietor Taduka Srihari	19 Sep 2023	Other	—
OS/30/2017	Manthri Yashasri, minor, through her mother Burka @ Manthri Sangeetha vs Vs1-Manthri Balnarsu	14 Sep 2023	Other	—
OS/188/2019	Bommena Parshaiah vs Bommena Balaiah	14 Sep 2023	Other	—
OS/437/2021	State Bank of India, Gandhi Chowk Branch, r/by is Manager Sri K. Venu vs ARL Textiles, r/by its Proprietor Addagatla Anjaneyulu	14 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/156/2018	Gaddam Jyothi vs Guntuka RAvinder	14 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/1022/2023	State of Telangana vs Mohammad Rafeeq	14 Sep 2023	Other	—
DVC/52/2021	Akubathini Chandrakala @ Alle Bharathi vs Akubathini Bhaskar	14 Sep 2023	Other	—
OS/231/2017	Amgothu Narsimhulu vs Vs1-Amgothu Kamalavva	12 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/365/2019	Syed Asra vs Syed Baber	12 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/464/2017	Kodam Sayanna vs Adepu Yashwanth	12 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/1229/2020	State of Telangana vs KURUKUNTLA NARSAIAH	11 Sep 2023	Other	—
OS/21/2023	Kola Godavari vs Shanigaram Ramesh @ramulu	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
OS/122/2023	Bandari Raju vs Bhoompelli Raghavareddy	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
OS/294/2019	Velpula Lingaiah vs Myaka Mallaiah	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
OS/297/2019	Velpula Lingaiah vs Myaka Mallaiah	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/2/2021	State of Telangana vs Gaddam Devaiah	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/7/2022	State of Telangana vs CHITHARI SUMAN	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/11/2017	Gokulakonda Kishan @ Kishna vs Gajjela Devaraju	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/21/2019	Palamakula Srikar Babu vs A1-Theegala Sandeep Goud	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/30/2018	Bheemanapalli Shivani vs Cheekoti Mahesh	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/34/2019	Sapa Chandra Shekar vs Gajula Ramesh	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/39/2018	M. Ramesh, SI of Police, PS Konaraopet vs Sarugu Anil	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/44/2021	State of Telangana vs Vsgudla vishnu	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/47/2021	State of Telangana vs Kondapalli Lingam	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/63/2022	State of Telangana vs Anagandula Laxmi	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/65/2018	Vangari Devadas vs A1-Vemula Raju	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/98/2022	State of Telangana vs NAVURU ANIL	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/127/2017	Kashaveni Rajitha vs Kuntelli Parsharamulu	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/135/2018	Bobbela Komuraiah vs A1-Bobbela Devaiah	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/135/2021	State of Telangana vs Vsboini ajay	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/157/2022	State of Telangana vs Chinthala Yadagiri	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/158/2022	State of Telangana vs Sathu srinivas reddy	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/167/2023	State of Telangana vs Bairagoni Venkatesham	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/168/2023	State of Telangana vs Thuti Mahesh	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/187/2022	State of Telangana vs JAVVAJI SRINIVAS	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/188/2022	State of Telangana vs UPPULA SRINIVAS	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/198/2018	Nandagiri Srinivas vs Mudrakola Ramesh	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/228/2023	State of Telangana vs Mugdam Suresh	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/278/2023	State of Telangana vs Annarapu Sathaiah	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/300/2022	State of Telangana vs JAVVAJI RAMESH	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/307/2017	Pathuri Sathi Reddy vs Pathuri Venkat Reddy	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/308/2021	State of Telangana vs MD amjad ali	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/337/2021	State of Telangana vs Vsmengani ellam	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/343/2021	State of Telangana vs Bathula Devaiah	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/348/2018	Pathuri Thirupathi Reddy vs A1-Guggilla Pranay	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/350/2022	State of Telangana vs Gundu srikanth	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/375/2020	State of Telangana vs Sura Raju	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/381/2020	State of Telangana vs ANTHADUPULA SUGUNA	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/395/2023	State of Telangana vs Konda Prathap	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/443/2018	Moogala Prabhakar vs Addhala Komuraiah	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/445/2018	Gandikota Devaraju vs Padala Harishgoud	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/448/2018	Aileni Raghupathi rao vs Kothakonda Suresh	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/479/2020	State of Telangana vs Neburi Thirupathi Reddy	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/480/2023	State of Telangana vs Jampelli Yellaiah	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/500/2023	State of Telangana vs Mothkuri Sai kumar	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/505/2021	State of Telangana vs Balayala Hanmaiah	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/522/2022	State of Telangana vs Bigulla Anjaiah	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/529/2022	State of Telangana vs Guggilla Bhumaiah	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/529/2023	State of Telangana vs Mergu Manohar	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/531/2023	State of Telangana vs Pogula Balavva	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/538/2023	State of Telangana vs Allepu Bhaskar	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/541/2023	State of Telangana vs Sirimalla Prakash	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/564/2020	State of Telangana vs URADI GANGARAJU	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/579/2023	State of Telangana vs Merugu Shivaprasad	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/586/2023	State of Telangana vs Belle Suresh	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/591/2022	State of Telangana vs Ponnam Sai Kumar	09 Sep 2023	Other	—
CC/602/2022	State of Telangana vs Gavinolla Srinivas Reddy	09 Sep 2023	Other	—

Showing 100 of 562 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Sep 2023		310
Aug 2023		66
Jul 2023		63
Jun 2023		125

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Smt. Himabindhu Mudavath handled?

Smt. Himabindhu Mudavath has handled 564 court orders since 2023 at Rajanna Sircilla, PDJ Court Complex. The average disposal rate is 143 orders per month.

What types of cases does Smt. Himabindhu Mudavath hear?

Based on available records, Smt. Himabindhu Mudavath primarily handles Criminal matters (Criminal Cases, Summary Trial Cases) and Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) at Rajanna Sircilla, PDJ Court Complex.

Where is Smt. Himabindhu Mudavath currently posted?

Smt. Himabindhu Mudavath is posted as Prl. Junior Civil Judge -cum- Judicial Magistrate of First Class Rajanna Sircilla at Rajanna Sircilla, PDJ Court Complex, Rajanna Siricilla, Telangana.

Are judgments by Smt. Himabindhu Mudavath available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Smt. Himabindhu Mudavath are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Smt. Himabindhu Mudavath dispose cases?

Smt. Himabindhu Mudavath disposes approximately 143 cases per month, based on 564 orders handled over their tenure at Rajanna Sircilla, PDJ Court Complex.

Since when is Smt. Himabindhu Mudavath serving?

Smt. Himabindhu Mudavath has been serving at Rajanna Sircilla, PDJ Court Complex since 2023.

Case Types

CC 77%

OS 15%

STC 3%

PRC 3%

DVC 2%

EP 1%

MC 0%

Posting History

Jun 2023 — Sep 2023

Prl. Junior Civil Judge -cum- Judicial Magistrate of First Class Rajanna Sircilla · 564 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Smt. P. Neeraja

Prl. District and Sessions Judge

68 orders

Smt.V.Pushpalatha

I Addl District and Sessions Judge

206 orders

Radhika Jaiswal

Spl. Sessions Judge of FTC for POCSO Cases

82 orders

Sri. A. Praveen

Prl. Junior Civil Judge -cum- Judicial Magistrate...

2,702 orders

Smt Kaveti Srujana

I Additional Junior Civil Judge -cum- I Additional...

1,657 orders

Ms. Gaddam Meghana

II Additional Junior Civil Judge -cum- II Addition...

817 orders

Sri P.Laxmana Chary

Senior Civil Judge

613 orders

Smt. K Jyothirmai

Junior Civil Judge, Vemulawada

5,557 orders

Sri Ajay Kumar Jadhav

Senior Civil Judge Vemulawada

182 orders

← View all judges at Rajanna Sircilla, PDJ Court Complex

Smt. Himabindhu Mudavath

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

AT, RAJANNA SIRCILLA.

Original Suit No.71 of 2013

// A N D //

:: J U D G M E N T ::

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR THE PLAINTIFF: FOR THE DEFENDANTS:

EXHIBITS MARKED

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

AT, RAJANNA SIRCILLA.

Original Suit No.108 of 2023

// A N D //

:: J U D G M E N T ::

WITNESSES EXAMINED

EXHIBITS MARKED

OS/108/2023

Pochamma Temple, S.C. Colony, represented by its president Eluri Narsaiah.

AND

ORDER

SIRCILLA

SIRCILLA .

OS/71/2013

BHUKYA RAMULU

AND

MALOTHU RAJU

ORDER

SIRCILLA

SIRCILLA .

EP/1/2023

AND

ORDER

SIRCILLA