Sri J. Vikram

Page No.1 of 5 Crl.R.P.32 of 2025

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRIAL OF SPE AND

ACB CASES-CUM-VI ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE,

KARIMNAGAR

PRESENT:J.VIKRAM, Spl. Judge for trial of SPE & ACB Cases-cum VI Additional Sessions Judge, Karimnagar.

Monday, this the 22nd day of December, 2025

Crl.R.P.No.32 of 2025

IN

Crl.M.P.557 of 2025

IN

CC.No.1567 of 2017

Between: The State of Telangana represented by Inspector of Police, CID RO Karimnagar through the Public Prosecutor, Karimnagar. …Revision Petitioner/State.

And

Sidduri Sampath Rao, S/o.Laxmarao, Age: 44 years, Electrician-cum-Fitter, Nagar Panchayath Jammikunta of Karimnagar District. … Respondents/Accused.

On revision from the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class-cum-Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Karimnagar in Crl.M.P.no.557 of 2025 in CC No.1567 of 2017, dated 06.11.2025.

BETWEEN: The State of Telangana represented by Inspector of Police, CID RO Karimnagar through the Public Prosecutor, Karimnagar.

... Petitioner/Complainant.

AND Sidduri Sampath Rao, S/o.Laxmarao, Age: 44 years, Electrician-cum-Fitter, Nagar Panchayath Jammikunta of Karimnagar District.

...Respondent/Accused.

Revision Petition filed under Section 397 of Cr.P.C. r/w Section 438 of the

BNSS, 2023.

Page No.2 of 5 Crl.R.P.32 of 2025

This Criminal Revision Petition came before me on 10.12.2025 for final hearing in the presence of Additional Public Prosecutor for the Revision Petitioner/Petitioner/Complainant and of Sri B.Harshavardhan Reddy, Advocate for Respondent/accused; upon perusing material papers on record, upon hearing arguments and the matter having stood over for consideration to this day, the Court delivered the following:-

:: O R D E R ::

1. Being aggrieved by the order dated 06.11.2025 passed in

Crl.M.P.No.557 of 2025 in CC.No.1567 of 2017 by the Judicial Magistrate

of First Class-cum-Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Karimnagar this Criminal Revision

Petition is filed under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure r/w 438 of the BNSS, 2023 praying this Court to set aside the said order under which the learned Magistrate dismissed.

2.The parties herein after would be referred to as arrayed in the criminal miscellaneous petition.

3.Contents of the Revision petition in brief that on 29.01.2013 at 1930 hours the complainant District Panchayath Officer (FAC) Karimnagar lodged a complaint before the Additional Director General of Police, CID,

Hyderabad against the respondent/accused as per the directions of the

Commissioner (PR&RD), AP, Hyderabad alleging that the respondent/accused for his personal benefit to get the salary from 010

Head, on PAR with other employees and to obtain the post of Panchayath

Secretary, he filed false and fabricated copy of G.O.RT.No.1470/PR&RD,

dated 03.12.1996 in the Hon’ble APAT and dishonestly cheat the APAT as

Page No.3 of 5 Crl.R.P.32 of 2025

well as the Government.

4.While pending the said case for Judgment before the learned trial

Judge the revision petitioner filed petition under section 91 Cr.P.C. vide

Crl.M.P.557 of 2025 to call for the entire record pertaining to the

O.A.No.2900/2010 on the file of the then Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh

Administrative Tribunal which is presently under Hon’ble High Court of

Telangana Registrar in which the respondent/accused filed a fake G.O.

copy vide G.O.Rt.no.1470 and obtained orders in his favour.

5.The learned trial Judge dismissed the said call for petition observing that to cover up the lacunas of the investigation the said petition is filed.

Hence, against the said order the present revision is filed praying this

Court to set aside the order of learned trial Judge.

6.The counsel for the respondent/accused filed counter contending that the respondent/accused never obtained any promotion and enhancement of salary on the basis of copy of G.O.Rt.No.1470/PR&RD Dept, in APAT and prayed to dismiss the revision petition.

7.Heard the learned counsels for petitioner and respondent.

8.Following point for determination is:

Whether the order passed by learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class- cum-Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Karimnagar in Crl.M.P.no.557 of 2025 in CC

No.1567 of 2017, dated 06.11.2025 suffer from any illegality or irregularity

Page No.4 of 5 Crl.R.P.32 of 2025

warranting interference?

9.POINT:- Perused the record. After conclusion of trial and after hearing arguments on both sides in CC.No.1567/2017 the learned trial

Judge posted the matter for Judgment and at that fag end of the case the

prosecution has moved a criminal miscellaneous petition calling for the documents stating that the documents sought under the said petition are very much essential for proper adjudication of the case. The learned trial

Judge after going through the record dismissed the said petition observing

that the original record on the file of the then Hon’ble tribunal is already marked as Ex.P10 and as per the proceedings issued by the then District

Panchayath Officer vide order in ROC.No.A5/1262/2010-PTS all the original records required by the investigating officer shall be produced by him and he shall assist the Nodal Officer and the prosecution did not explain the sufficient reasons of necessity for calling for the record when already the tribunal proceedings are marked through the investigating officer and the prosecution has not taken any steps to call for the said record at early stage from the tribunal.

10.The reasons assigned by the learned trial Judge in dismissing the petition under revision are very much sufficient and are reasonable and this

Court is of the opinion that there is no need to interfere with the reasons

Page No.5 of 5 Crl.R.P.32 of 2025

assigned by the learned trial Judge while dismissing the petition under revision. This point is answered accordingly.

11.In the result, the Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed as devoid of merit.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer Gr.II directly on Computer, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 22nd day of December, 2025.

Special Judge,

for trial of SPE and ACB cases- cum-VI Additional Sessions Judge, Karimnagar.

:: APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE:: -NIL-

Special Judge,

for trial of SPE and ACB cases- cum-VI Additional Sessions Judge, Karimnagar.

1 Crl.M.P no.1380 of 2025

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRIAL OF SPE AND ACB CASES,

KARIMNAGAR

PRESENT:J.VIKRAM, Spl. Judge for trial of SPE & ACB Cases, Karimnagar.

Monday, this the 22nd day of December, 2025

Crl.M.P no.1380 of 2025

in

Cr. no. 20/RCT-ACB-ADB/2025

Between Gurubelli Venkat Narsimha Rao, S/o.Krishnaiah, Age: 52 years, Occ: District Manager Civil Supplies, KB Asifabad, R/o.H.No.4-7-17, Sri Sai Nagar Colony, Vyjayanthi Cinema Hall, Nacharam, Uppal, Dist: Ranga Reddy. ….Petitioner/Accused officer no.1.

&

The State of Telangana through the Anti Corruption Bureau, Adilabad Range, Adilabad.

….Respondent/Complainant

This petition has come before me on 16.12.2025 for hearing in the presence of Sri M.Jangaiah, Advocate for the petitioner/accused officer no.1, and Smt. T.Jyothi, Special Public Prosecutor for trial of ACB cases, Karimnagar for the respondent/complainant and upon perusal of the material papers available on record and the matter having heard, read over and stood to till this day for consideration, this Court delivered the following:

:: ORDER ::

1.This is second bail petition filed by the petitioner/accused officer no.1 under Section 480 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for the offence alleged under Section 7(b) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 praying this Court to enlarge the petitioner/accused officer no.1 on bail in the interest of justice.

2 Crl.M.P no.1380 of 2025

2.The petitioner/accused officer no.1 in replica to his earlier bail application further submitted that except filing of charge sheet entire investigation is completed. He further submitted that his earlier bail application was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 26.11.2025 in Crl.M.P.no.1292/2025. Hence, prayed to enlarge the petitioner/accused officer no.1 on bail.

3. The learned Special Public Prosecutor for trial of ACB cases, Karimnagar has initially filed counter strictly opposing the bail, however, today she filed memo stating that section 183(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 statement of the complainant was recorded on 19.12.2025.

4.Heard the both counsel and perused the material on record.

5.Now the point for consideration is:

Whether the petitioner/accused officer no.1 is entitled for the relief as prayed for?

POINT:

6.The case of the prosecution as per remand case diary dated 07.11.2025 is that, on 06.11.2025 at 17.42 hours, the petitioner/accused officer no.1 was caught red handed by the ACB officials of Adilabag Range, Adilabad on NH

No.363 road by intercepting his Car driven by Accused Officer no.2, over

Kagaznagar X road bridge, while he was escaping after demanding and accepting an amount of Rs.75,000/- as a bribe from the complainant through

AO2 as illegal gratification other than legal remuneration and undue advantage for showing official favour i.e., “for having been allowed the complainant’s 3 Crl.M.P no.1380 of 2025 three lorries with CMR rice load from his rice mill to Civil Supply Godown in

Asifabad”.

7.This is the second bail application filed by the petitioner/accused officer no.1 seeking post arrest bail. Learned Special Public Prosecutor for trial of SPE & ACB Cases, Karimnagar though opposed bail by way of filing counter, but the memo filed today itself clearly reveals that the statement of the complainant under section 183(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 was recorded on 19.12.2025.

8.Therefore, since the statement of the complainant under Section 183(5) of the BNSS, 2023 is reported to be recorded on 19.12.2025, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner/accused officer no.1 on bail, however, on the following conditions:

1)the petitioner/accused officer no.1 shall furnish personal bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties for the like amount each to the satisfaction of this Court;

2)the petitioner/accused officer no.1 shall remain present before the Investigating Officer on every Saturday in between 10:00 A.M to 5:00 P.M to till further order of this Court;

3)the petitioner/accused officer no.1 shall cooperate with the investigation and make himself available for the same whenever required;

4)the petitioner/accused officer no.1 shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any witness acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the investigating officer; 4 Crl.M.P no.1380 of 2025

5)the petitioner/accused officer no.1 shall not obstruct or hamper the investigation and not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the investigating officer;

6)the petitioner/accused officer no.1 shall not leave the territory of India without prior permission of the Court to till trial is over;

7)the petitioner/accused officer no.1 shall maintain law and order;

8)the petitioner/accused officer no.1 shall furnish his residential address, e-mail address and mobile number to this Court, and shall not change his residence to till the final disposal of the case;

9)the petitioner/accused officer no.1 shall surrender his passport, if any,

before this Court, and if he do not possess any passport, shall file an

affidavit to that effect before this Court; and

10) the petitioner/accused officer no.1 shall regularly remain present during the trial, and cooperate the Court to complete the trial.

This point is answered in favour of the petitioner/accused officer no.1 and against the respondent/complainant.

9.In the result, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed with conditions.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer Gr.II directly on Computer, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court, on this the 22nd day of December, 2025.

Special Judge,

for trial of SPE and ACB cases, Karimnagar.

Copy to The Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, Adilabad Range, Adilabad.

1 Crl.M.P no.1381 of 2025

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRIAL OF SPE AND ACB CASES,

KARIMNAGAR

PRESENT:J.VIKRAM, Spl. Judge for trial of SPE & ACB Cases, Karimnagar.

Monday, this the 22nd day of December, 2025

Crl.M.P no.1381 of 2025

in

Cr. no. 20/RCT-ACB-ADB/2025

Between Kothagolla Manikanth, S/o.Srinivas, Age: 28 years, Occ: Technical Assistant (OS), O/o the Civil Supplies KB Asifabad, R/o.H.No.2-45/2, Andol village and mandal of Sangareddy district. ….Petitioner/Accused officer no.2.

&

The State of Telangana through the Anti Corruption Bureau, Adilabad Range, Adilabad.

….Respondent/Complainant

This petition has come before me on 16.12.2025 for hearing in the presence of Sri C.Raghunandan Raju, Advocate for the petitioner/accused officer no.2, and Smt. T.Jyothi, Special Public Prosecutor for trial of ACB cases, Karimnagar for the respondent/complainant and upon perusal of the material papers available on record and the matter having heard, read over and stood to till this day for consideration, this Court delivered the following:

:: ORDER ::

1.This is second bail petition filed by the petitioner/accused officer no.2 under Section 480 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for the offence alleged under Section 7(b) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 praying this Court to enlarge the petitioner/accused officer no.2 on bail in the interest of justice.

2 Crl.M.P no.1381 of 2025

2.The petitioner/accused officer no.2 in replica to his earlier bail application further submitted that except filing of charge sheet entire investigation is completed. He further submitted that his earlier bail application was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 26.11.2025 in Crl.M.P.no.1274/2025. Hence, prayed to enlarge the petitioner/accused officer no.2 on bail.

3. The learned Special Public Prosecutor for trial of ACB cases, Karimnagar has initially filed counter strictly opposing the bail, however, today she filed memo stating that section 183(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 statement of the complainant was recorded on 19.12.2025.

4.Heard the both counsel and perused the material on record.

5.Now the point for consideration is:

Whether the petitioner/accused officer no.2 is entitled for the relief as prayed for?

POINT:

6.The case of the prosecution as per remand case diary dated 07.11.2025 is that, on 06.11.2025 at 17.42 hours, the petitioner/accused officer no.2 was caught red handed by the ACB officials of Adilabag Range, Adilabad on NH

No.363 road by intercepting Car driven by him, over Kagaznagar X road bridge, while he was escaping after demanding and accepting an amount of

Rs.75,000/- as a bribe from the complainant on the instructions of AO1 as illegal gratification other than legal remuneration and undue advantage for showing official favour i.e., “for having been allowed the complainant’s three 3 Crl.M.P no.1381 of 2025 lorries with CMR rice load from his rice mill to Civil Supply Godown in Asifabad” by AO1.

7.This is the second bail application filed by the petitioner/accused officer no.2 seeking post arrest bail. Learned Special Public Prosecutor for trial of SPE & ACB Cases, Karimnagar though opposed bail by way of filing counter, but the memo filed today itself clearly reveals that the statement of the complainant under section 183(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 was recorded on 19.12.2025.

8.Therefore, since the statement of the complainant under Section 183(5) of the BNSS, 2023 is reported to be recorded on 19.12.2025, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner/accused officer no.2 on bail, however, on the following conditions:

1)the petitioner/accused officer no.2 shall furnish personal bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties for the like amount each to the satisfaction of this Court;

2)the petitioner/accused officer no.2 shall remain present before the Investigating Officer on every Saturday in between 10:00 A.M to 5:00 P.M to till further order of this Court;

3)the petitioner/accused officer no.2 shall cooperate with the investigation and make himself available for the same whenever required;

4)the petitioner/accused officer no.2 shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any witness acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the investigating officer; 4 Crl.M.P no.1381 of 2025

5)the petitioner/accused officer no.2 shall not obstruct or hamper the investigation and not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the investigating officer;

6)the petitioner/accused officer no.2 shall not leave the territory of India without prior permission of the Court to till trial is over;

7)the petitioner/accused officer no.2 shall maintain law and order;

8)the petitioner/accused officer no.2 shall furnish his residential address, e-mail address and mobile number to this Court, and shall not change his residence to till the final disposal of the case;

9)the petitioner/accused officer no.2 shall surrender his passport, if any,

before this Court, and if he do not possess any passport, shall file an

affidavit to that effect before this Court; and

10) the petitioner/accused officer no.2 shall regularly remain present during the trial, and cooperate the Court to complete the trial.

This point is answered in favour of the petitioner/accused officer no.2 and against the respondent/complainant.

9.In the result, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed with conditions.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer Gr.II directly on Computer, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court, on this the 22nd day of December, 2025.

Special Judge,

for trial of SPE and ACB cases, Karimnagar.

Copy to The Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, Adilabad Range, Adilabad.

M,

.*0*- ^ ./UST'C^ ^

BEFORE THE LOK ADALATH: AT : KARIMNAGAR.

(Constituted by District Legal Services Authority, Karimnagar Under Section 19 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987)

Sunday,the 2V^day of December, 2025.

PRESENT: D. SADHANA Presiding Judge Il-Addl. District & Sessions Judge. Karimnagar.

Sri L. Nagaraju, Advocate/Member.

Lok Adalath Case No.^^ of 2025

MVOP. No.37 of 2023 (on the file of Spl. ACB Court-cum-VI Addl. District Court, Karimnagar). Between:-

1. Kukkala Swapna, W/o. Kukkala Suman, age 25 years. Occ: House wife.

2. Kukkala Shivani, D/o. Kukkala Suman, age 9 years.Occ: Minor.

3. Kukkala Bhavani, D/o. Kukkala Suman, age 7 years, Occ: Minor,

The Petitioners No.2 and 3 are minors, represented by their natural mother next friend Petitioner No.l herein all are R/o. Vemulawada proper, presently residing at H.No.8-5-426, Raghavendra Nagar, Karimnagar.

...Petitioners.

AND

1. Kamre Vinod, S/o. Vittal age 32 years, Occ: Driver, R/o. H.No.6-21, Malepur Village of Narnur Mandal, Adilabad District, (Driver of the Bajaj Pulsar Motor Cycle bearing No.TS-29-F-2756).

2.PadigalaSai,S/o.Srinivas, age22 years,R/o.H.No. 1-2-42,Ganeshnagar, Vemulawada, (Owner of the Bajaj Pulsar Motor Cycle bearing No.TS-29-F-2756).

3. Bobbili Mahesh, S/o. Lingaiah, age not known but major, R/o. Phanigiri Village Nagaram Mandal of Suryapet District. (Owner of the Bajaj Pulsar Motor Cycle “^ng NO.TS-29-F-2756).

Hanumaiah, age 27 years, R/o. H.No.3-93, Marupaka Iilli|blpf Vemulawada Town(Driver cum Owner of the Passion Pro Motor Cycle V? Vi/

e^n^ NO.TS -02-EG-1068).

\ B;Allianz General Insurance Company Limited, Represented by its Branch er.

^^ata Sai Ram Archad Shop no. 10 and 11 Old CPI Office Building Nehuru

-iWagar, Khammam. 507 002. (now H.No.8-3-201/1,floor, Veeraih Chowdhari Complex, Waira Road, Khammam) ( Bajaj Pulsar Motor Cycle bearing No.TS-29-F-2756, Policy No.OG-19-1813-1826- 00001358 Policy issuing Office).

Company Limited, Represented by its Branch

6. Baiai Allianz General Insurance

Manager, 8-6-126, Kothi Bomma Circle, Kothirampur,Karimnagar.

...Respondents.

i1 /see. 166(1)(c) M This petition dt.06-02-2023 filed by the petitioner

for the death of Kukk^a

MV Act claiming compensation of Rs.30,00,000=00

in the accident which occurred due to rash and negligentdriving of the

CyclebearingNO.TS-29-F-2756,thattookplaceon

BajajPulsarMotor frontof Abhayanjaneya Swamy Temple, 27-01-2021atabout01.00P.M.in

Agraharam Village, Vemulawada lown.

Value for the purpose of the Court fee and Jurisdictionis Rs.30,00,000 00 and court fees of Rs.29.36Q=00 is paid under Rule 475(i) (b| of the T.S.M.V. Rules, the Lok Adalathat the requestof both referredto Thispetitionwas

hied by the Advocate for the Petitioner and Respondents

parties/on the Joint Memo Accident Claim Spl. ACB Court-cum-VI Addl. District No. 5 and 6 before the Motor Court. Karimnagar. This petition is coming on for final settlement inthe presence of petitioner Advocatefor the petitioner and

and the Respondents and Sri G. Srinivas Goud.

Sri. M.V. Ranga Reddy, Advocate for the respondentsNo. 5 and 6.Both parties to the" petition have agreed for amicable settlement.Hence, the following Awardis passed as per the settlement arrived by the parties.

AWARD

An amount of Rs. 10,50,000=00 (Rupees Ten lakhs andfifty thousandonly) is 1

against respondents jointly and severally, but to be

awarded to the petitioner indemnified by Respondents No. 5 and 6 being the insurer.

awarded Rs.5,50,000=00 (Rupees Fivelakhs and

2.That the Petitioner No.lis fifty thousand only) and she is permitted to withdrawan entire amount of lakhs and fifty thousand only), soon after deposit Rs.5,50,000=00 (Rupees Five

by the respondents No. 5 and 6/Insurance company.

3, That the Petitioner No.2 and 3 i^ awarded Rs.2,50,000-00(Rupees Two lakhs and fifty thousandonly) eachand they' are beingMinors,theirentire

50,000=00 (Rupees TXvo lakhs and fifty thodfeand

awarded amountof Rs.2, Nationalized banktillthey lyjeach shall be kept in fixed deposit in any on

respondents n45

attains the age of majority soon after deposit by the 6/lnsurance company.

6 failed to deposit the above amount within’■twi„^

4.If Respondents No.5 and awarded shall carry interest at 7.5% per months from today, the amountso ca > annum.0o <'l'> a

m

fee of Rs.29,360=00 shall be refunded U/sec.21(l) r/w.section 25 of ^5. The Court the Legal Services Act, 1987.

evidence of their consent for the Both parties have affixed their signatures in terms of Award.

v> fv

P0 F>-

r

O 0 (^■r\ beXuJ ^ Q- 4 . UO w/-■

RESPONDENTS

PETITIONERS

<-vod/

COUNSEL yOR THE PETITIONERSCOUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENTS.

Given under my hand and the seal of Lok Adalath onthis the 21day of December, 2025 at Karimnagar. cJ^

.3LV\va,\l'S'

D. SADHANA

PRESIDING JUDGE cum II-ADJ

MEMBER:-

Sri L. NagarajuTAdvocate.

■■ *\ . X; * t ■; J"'*' 4

ml

BEFORE THE LOK ADALATH: AT: KARIMNAGAR.

{Constituted by District Legal Services Authority, Karimnagar Under Section 19 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987)

Sunday,the 21** day of December, 2025.

PRESENT: D. SADHANA Presiding Judge Il-Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Karimnagar.

Sri L. Nagaraju, Advocate/Member.

) 305^ Lok Adalath Case No.of 2025

MVOP. No. 19 of 2023 (on the file of Spl. ACB Court-cum-VI Addl. District Court, Karimnagar). Between:-

Jeedi @ Jedi Padma, W/o. Ravi, Caste: SC-Madiga. age 36 years, Occ: Coolie Work, PreviouslyresidedinIndiranagar,ShalapalliH/o.ChelpoorVillage,Mandal Revenue Huzurbad, District; Karimnagar. Presently residing in H.No.7-85/1, SC Colony, Huzurbad town and Mandal Revenue, District Karimnagar.

...Petitioner.

AND

1. Bodige Venkat Raju, S/o. Saraiah, age 40 years, Occ: Driver of the Lorry bearing NO.TS-36-T-8909, R/o. H.No.5-8/C, Pandilla Village.Mandal Revenue: Husnabad District Siddipet, Pin Code NO.505 467, Telangana State.

2. Manchala Raju, S/o. Chandraiah, aged about 46 yearsOcc: Business, Owner of the Lorry bearing No.TS-36-T-8909, R/o. H.NO. 12-22/1, Husnabad Village town and Mandal Revenue. District Siddipet - Pin Code No.505 467.

3. Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited, Represented by its Manager,BranchOffice:KarimnagarDoorNo.8-6-117,VijayaComplex, KothirampoorLocality,HyderabadRoad,Beside:UnionBankofIndia, Karimnagar town proper - Pin code No.505 001, TelanganaState.

...Respondents.

This petition dt.24-01-2023 filed by the petitionerU/sec. 166 (11fa) of M.V.Act claiming compensation of Rs. 1.00.000=00 for the injuj icssustained by him in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 26-10-2021 at about 15:00 hours (03:00 P.M.) near Rajapalli Village, Mandal Revenue: Huzurabad.

Value for the purpose of the Gqjmt fee and jurisdictionisRs. 1,00.000=00 and court fees of Rs.360=00 is paid under Rule 475 (i) (b) of the TS.M.V. Rules. ''> Thispetition wasreferredtotheLokAdalat)attherequestof both parties/on the Joint Memo filed by the Advocate fbr tlie Petitioners and Respondent No 3 before the Motor Accident ClaimSpl. ACB Court-cum-VI Addl. District Court, Karimnagar.

9^ This petition is coming on for final settlement in the presence of petitioner andtheRespondentsandSriM.Sadaiah,Advocateforthepetitionerand Sri. Syed Hasanuddin Chisty. Advocate for the respondent No.3. Both parties to the petition have agreedfor amicable settlement.Hence, the following Awardis passed as per the settlement arrived by the parties.

AWARD

1. An amount of Rs.60,000=00 (Rupees Sixtythousand only)is awarded to the petitioner against respondents jointly and severally, but to be indemnified by

Respondent No.3 being the insurer.

2.That the petitioner is awarded Rs.60,000=00 (Rupees Sixty thousand only) and she is permitted to withdraw an entire amount of Rs.60,000=00 (Rupees Sixty thousand only), soon after deposit by the respondent No.3/Insurance Company.

3.If Respondent No.3 failed to deposit the above amountwithin two months from today, the amount so awarded shall carry interest at 7.5% per annum.

4.The Court fee of Rs.360=00 shall be refunded U/sec.21(l) r/w. section 25 of the Legal ServicesAct, 1987.

Both parties have affixed their signatures in evidenceof their consent for the terms of Award.

A V)- W

PETITIONEI^

RESPONDENTS

• ■ i cx:i cy~uxC\.j COUNSEL FOR THE PETI'TIONERCOUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENTS. Given under my hand and the seal of Lok Adalath on this the 2P^day of December. 2025 at Karimnagar.

D. SADHANA

ESIDING JUDGE cum H-ADJ MEMBER:-

A Sri L. Nagaraju, Advocate.