Sri K.Chakradhara Srinivas

Prl.Junior Civil Judge Nellore

Principal District and Sessions Court, Nellore · Nellore · Andhra Pradesh

Sri K.Chakradhara Srinivas, Prl.Junior Civil Judge Nellore, is posted at Principal District and Sessions Court, Nellore, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India. 113 court orders on record since 2018. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, EP, CC cases.

113

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

OS/621/2019

M/s. Corporation Bank vs Sada Gopi alias Gopireddy

29 Jan 2021

O.S.No.621/2019 Dt.29.01.2021

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE: NELLORE

Present: Sri K.Chakradhara Srinivas,

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

NELLORE.

Friday, this the 29th day of January, 2021

ORIGINAL SUIT No.621 of 2019

Corporation Bank, Dargamitta Branch, Nellore City, Rep. By its Chief Manager, D. Shakeela, W/o G. Hussain, Muslim, Aged about 40 years,

Dargamitta, Nellore City. ...Plaintiff

Vs.

Sada Gopi @ Gopi Reddy, S/o Venkateswarlu, Hindu, Aged about 33 years, R/o D.No.25/2/448, 10th Street, B-Block, Lakeview Colony,

Nellore City ...Defendant

This suit coming on 28.01.2021 for hearing before me in the presence of Sri M.V. Vijaya Kumari, Advocate for the plaintiff and the defendant having been called absent and set exparte and upon hearing on behalf of the plaintiff, this Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

The plaintiff filed this suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.63,959.30 paise with future interest as per contract rate from date of suit till the date of realization on the principal amount of Rs.50,000/- borrowed by the defendant under loan agreement dated 04.09.2015 and costs of this suit.

2. The averments of the plaint, in brief, are as follows:-

The plaintiff submitted that the defendant approached the plaintiff bank seeking financial assistance for a sum of Rs.50,000/- for the purpose of improving his business i.e. scooter mechanic shop and agreeing to repay the loan amount with interest at 12% p.a. thereon as per the terms of loan agreement.

The plaintiff further contended that after satisfying with the terms and conditions , the plaintiff bank sanctioned for an amount of Rs.50,000/- to the defendant vide loan account bearing No.CLUCC/01/150002 as per

O.S.No.621/2019 Dt.29.01.2021

rules of the bank with hypothecation of stocks. Due to that the defendant executed necessary loan documents on 04.09.2015 as required under the rules of plaintiff bank.

The plaintiff further contended that the defendantg made part payments on different dates towards discharge of monthly installments and an amount of Rs.4,000/- paid by the defendant on 02.12.2016 which was the last part payment in the said loan. Inspite of repeated demands, the defendant failed to pay the loan amount. Later plaintiff bank got issued legal notice to the defendant on 08.04.2019, but the defendant managed to returned the said notice and failed to pay the amount due to the bank and committed default in payment of loan amount to the bank. Hence the plaintiff bank constrained to file this suit for recovery of loan amount from the defendant.

3.The plaintiff bank permitted to publish summons to the defendant in Eenadu Daily news paper, Nellore on or before 16.03.2020 and directed to appear before this Court on 31.03.20020 but he is not turned up to the Court for submitting his written statement. He was set exparte on 04.01.2021.

4.To prove the case of the plaintiff, the plaintiff filed his chief examination affidavit on 28.01.2021 and he was examined as PW1. The

Chief Manager of the plaintiff bank deposed before this Court that he sanctioned for a sun of Rs.50,000/- to the defendant under Ex.A2 deed of hypothecation agreement dated 04.09.2015.

5.Heard arguments on behalf of the Chief Manager of plaintiff bank. Perused the material available on record.Now the point for consideration is:-

“Whether the plaintiff bank is entitled for the suit claim or not?”

6. POINT:

The plaintiff bank sanctioned for a sum of Rs.50,000/- under

Ex.A2-Deed of Hypothecation agreement with subsequent interest at the rate of 12% per annum to improve his business, but inspite of repeated demands the defendant failed to pay the loan amount. The plaintiff bank issued legal notice on 08.04.2019, but the defendant managed to return the same. The evidence of PW1 left unchallenged, his evidence is corroborated with the documentary evidence. Ex.A2 is the Deed of

O.S.No.621/2019 Dt.29.01.2021

Hypothecation executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff bank.

But the defendant committed default in repayment of installments, the plaintiff bank waived his right to collect the same in installments and treated the loan due in lumpsum. As on 31.03.2019 an amount of Rs.63,959.30 paise is outstanding. The unchallenged evidence of PW1 established the case of the plaintiff. Hence, the plaintiff bank is entitled to the suit claim of

Rs.63,959.30 paise. This point is answered accordingly.

7.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs for Rs.63,959.30 paise with subsequent interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the principal amount of Rs.50,000/- from the date of the suit till the date of realization.

Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by her, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 29th day of January, 2021.

PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NELLORE.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT:

PW1: Shaik Basheer AhmedNone (Exparte)

DOCUMENTS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF:

Ex.A1 is the loan application dated 04.09.2015

Ex.A2 is the Deed of Hypothecation of agreement dated 04.09.2015 executed by defendant in favour of plaintiff bank.

Ex.A3 is the Demand Promissory note

Ex.A4 is the Office copy of legal notice

Ex.A5 is the unserved postal cover

Ex.A6 is the statement of account

Ex.A7 is the paper publication

FOR DEFENDANT:

O.S.No.621/2019 Dt.29.01.2021

- NIL -

PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NELLORE.

OS/630/2019

M/s. Corporation Bank vs Veerapareddy Jyothi

28 Jan 2021

O.S.No.630/2019 Dt.28.01.2021

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE: NELLORE

Present: Sri K.Chakradhara Srinivas,

Principal Junior Civil Judge, NELLORE.

Thursday, this the 28th day of January, 2021

ORIGINAL SUIT No.630 of 2019

Corporation Bank, Dargamitta Branch, Nellore City, Rep. By its Chief Manager, D. Shakeela, W/o G. Hussain, Muslim, Aged about 40 years,

Dargamitta, Nellore City. ...Plaintiff

Vs.

Veerapareddy Jyothi, W/o Venkata Ramana Reddy, Hindu, Aged about 40 years, R/o D.No.25/2/43, 3rd Street, Postal Colony,

Nellore City ...Defendant

J U D G M E N T

The plaintiff filed this suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.58,755.32 paise with future interest as per contract rate from date of suit till the date of realization on the principal amount of Rs.50,000/- borrowed by the defendant under loan agreement dated 29.08.2016 and costs of this suit.

2. The averments of the plaint, in brief, are as follows:-

The plaintiff submitted that the defendant approached the plaintiff bank seeking financiakl assistance for a sum of Rs.50,000/- for the purpose of improving his business i.e. vegetable market and provision shop and agreeing to repay the loan amount with interest at 9.90% thereon as per the terms of loan agreement.

O.S.No.630/2019 Dt.28.01.2021

rules of the bank with hypothecation of stocks. Due to that the defendant executed necessary loan documents on 29.08.2016 as required under the rules of plaintiff bank.

The plaintiff further contended that the defendantg made part payments on different dates towards discharge of monthly installments and an amount of Rs.3,000/- paid by the defendant on 08.08.2017 which was the last part payment in the said loan. Inspite of repeated demands, the defendant failed to pay the loan amount. Later plaintiff bank got issued legal notice to the defendant on 08.04.2019, but the defendant managed to returned the said notice and failed to pay the amount due to the bank and committed default in payment of loan amount to the bank. Hence the plaintiff bank constrained to file this suit for recovery of loan amount from the defendant.

3.The summons sent from this Court on 12.02.2020 to the defendant is pending and he is not turned up to the Court for submitting his written statement. He was set exparte on 06.03.2020.

4.To prove the case of the plaintiff, the plaintiff filed his chief examination affidavit on 28.01.2021 and he was examined as PW1. The

Chief Manager of the plaintiff bank deposed before this Court that he sanctioned for a sun of Rs.50,000/- to the defendant under Ex.A2 deed of hypothecation agreement dated 29.08.2016.

5.Heard arguments on behalf of the Chief Manager of plaintiff bank. Perused the material available on record.Now the point for consideration is:-

“Whether the plaintiff bank is entitled for the suit claim or not?”

6. POINT:

The plaintiff bank sanctioned for a sum of Rs.50,000/- under

Ex.A2-Deed of Hypothecation agreement with subsequent interest at the rate of 9.90% per annum to improve his business, but inspite of repeated demands the defendant failed to pay the loan amount. The plaintiff bank issued legal notice on 08.04.2019, but the defendant managed to return the same. The evidence of PW1 left unchallenged, his evidence is corroborated with the documentary evidence. Ex.A2 is the Deed of

Hypothecation executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff bank.

But the defendant committed default in repayment of installments, the

O.S.No.630/2019 Dt.28.01.2021

plaintiff bank waived his right to collect the same in installments and treated the loan due in lumpsum. As on 30.04.2019 an amount of Rs.58,755.32 paise is outstanding. The unchallenged evidence of PW1 established the case of the plaintiff. Hence, the plaintiff bank is entitled to the suit claim of

Rs.58,755.32 paise. This point is answered accordingly.

7.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs for Rs.58,755.32 paise with subsequent interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the principal amount of Rs.50,000/- from the date of the suit till the date of realization.

Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by her, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 28th day of January, 2021.

PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NELLORE.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT:

PW1: Shaik Basheer AhmedNone (Exparte)

DOCUMENTS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF:

Ex.A1 is the loan application dated 29.08.2016 Ex.A2 is the Deed of Hypothecation of agreement dated 29.08.2016 executed by defendant in favour of plaintiff bank. Ex.A3 is the Demand Promissory note dated 29.08.2016 Ex.A4 is the Office copy of legal notice dated 08.04.2019 Ex.A5 is the unserved postal cover Ex.A6 is the statement of account related to the defendant account bearing No.565151000350482 Ex.A7 is the paper publication

FOR DEFENDANT:

- NIL -

PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NELLORE.

OS/1326/2019

V. Srinivasulu Reddy vs Pillella Sridhar

29 Jan 2021

O.S.No.1326/2019 Dt.29.01.2021

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE: NELLORE

Present: Sri K.Chakradhara Srinivas,

Principal Junior Civil Judge, NELLORE.

Friday, this the 29th day of January, 2021

ORIGINAL SUIT No.1326 of 2019

V. Srinivasulu Reddy, S/o Brahma Reddy, Aged 45 years,

R/o Saraswathi Nagar, Nellore ...Plaintiff

Vs.

Pillella Sridhar, S/o Veera Raghavulu, Aged about 50 years, R/o D.No.8/8, Plot No.34, Manumasiddi Nagar, Near Old Hospital Road,

Nellore. ...Defendant

This suit coming on 29.01.2021 for hearing before me in the presence of Sri Sk. Mahaboob Basha, Advocate for the plaintiff and the defendant having been called absent and set exparte and upon hearing on behalf of the plaintiff, this Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

The plaintiff filed this suit to vacate the defendant and to deliver the plaint schedule property to the plaintiff and grant such other and further reliefs.

2. The averments of the plaint, in brief, are as follows:-

The plaintiff is the absolute owner of the plaint schedule property and about fouryears back he leased out the same to the defendant on a monthly rent of Rs.4,500/- per month. There is no written lease agreement and the lease is oral, the tenancy is from month to month. The tenancy starts from 1st date of month and ends by the last date of month.

The rent is payable on or before 10th of every succeeding month. The defendant paid the rent upto the month of August, 2018 and thereafter i.e.

from September, 2018 he committed default in payment of rents and also

O.S.No.1326/2019 Dt.29.01.2021

he is not vacating the plaint schedule shop room and also failed to pay rents and failed to pay electricity consumption charges, plaintiff got issued registered notice to the defendant through his advocate on 12.08.2019 asking him to vacate the schedule premises and deliver the plaint schedule property and handed over to the plaintiff and electricity consumption charges from September, 2018. The plaintiff got issued legal notice on 12.08.2019, but the defendant refused to receive the same. Hence the plaintiff constrained to file this suit.

3. Defendant called absent, no representation and not turned up to the Court and he was set exparte on 30.12.2020.

4.To prove the case of the plaintiff, the plaintiff filed his chief examination affidavit on 29.01.2021 and he was examined as PW1 on 29.01.2021. The plaintiff deposed before this Court that he leased out his plaint schedule property to the defendant but his tenant i.e. defendant not paid arrears of rents from September, 2018 to till date and not vacated the schedule premises and also not paid electricity bills and not attending

before this Court to proceed with this case and prayed to direct the

defendant to vacate the defendant from the schedule premises and prayed to deliver the plaint schedule property.

5.Heard arguments on behalf of the plaintiff. Perused the material available on record.Now the point for consideration is:

“Whether the plaintiff is entitled to deliver the suit

schedule property from the defendant or not?”

POINT:

6.The plaintiff claimed that he is the absolute owner of the property and he leased out the same to the defendant about 4 years back on a monthly rent of Rs.4,500/- per month, but there is no written agreement and the lease is oral. The plaintiff in his evidence stated before this Court that his tenant i.e. defendant not paid arrears of arents from September, 2018 to till date and not vacated the schedule premises and also not paid electricity bills and not attending before this Court to proceed with this case and

O.S.No.1326/2019 Dt.29.01.2021

prayed to direct the defendant to vacate the defendant from the schedule premises and prayed to deliver the plaint schedule property to him. The evidence of PW.1 left unchallenged. The plaintiff established his case with his oral evidence and documentary evidence Exs.A1 to A7. Hence the point is answered in favour of the plaiantiff and against the defendant..

7.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs directing the defendant to vacate the schedule premises within 30 days from the date of this judgment, otherwise plaintiff is directed to proceed in accordance with the law.

Dictated to the Stenographer on computer system and typed by her,

corrected and pronounced by me in open Court, on this the 29th day of January, 2021.

PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NELLORE.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT:

PW1: V. Srinivasulu Reddy None (Exparte)

DOCUMENTS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT:

Ex.A1 is the Electricity consumption charges bill for - Nil - the month of August 2019. Ex.A2 is the Office copy of legal notice dated 12.08.2019. Ex.A3 is the postal Receipt. Ex.A4 is the Un-served returned cover. Ex.A5 is the attested copy of sale deed. Ex.A6 is the attested copy of Property tax receipt. Ex.A7 is the attested copy of Registration of Firm.

PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NELLORE.

OS/31/2020

Potluri Srinivasulu vs Potluri Lakshmi Prasad

29 Jan 2021

O.S.No.31/2020 Dt.29.01.2021

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE: NELLORE

Present: Sri K.Chakradhara Srinivas,

Principal Junior Civil Judge, NELLORE.

Friday, this the 29th day of January, 2021

ORIGINAL SUIT No.31 of 2020

Potluri Srinivasulu, S/o Late Lakshmi Narayana, Hindu, Aged about 64 years, R/o D.No.1-3-368, Bangla Thota,

Nawabpet, Nellore City ...Plaintiff

Vs.

Potluri Lakshmi Prasad, S/o Late Lakshmi Narayana, Hindu, Aged about 50 years, R/o Nandamuri Nagar, S.T. Colony,

Kakupalli, Nellore Rural ...Defendant

This suit coming on 29.01.2021 for hearing before me in the presence of Sri R. Satyanarayana, Advocate for the plaintiff and the defendant having been called absent and set exparte and upon hearing on behalf of the plaintiff, this Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

The plaintiff filed this suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.2,32,516/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 12% per annum on the principal amount of Rs.1,75,000/- borrowed by the defendant under promissory note, dated 14.04.2017 and costs of this suit.

2. The averments of the plaint, in brief, are as follows:-

The defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.1,75,000/- from the plaintiff on 14.04.2017 for his necessities and executed a promissory note on the same day in favour of plaintiff and agreeing to repay the same with interest at 12% p.a. either to him or to his order on demand. The defendant did not pay any amount to the plaintiff towards the debt inspite of repeated demands made by theplaintiff and postponing the same on some pretext or other. On 20.11.2019 plaintiff issued legal notice to the defendant, the

O.S.No.31/2020 Dt.29.01.2021

defendant did not receive the notice and got it returned on some pretext or the other. Hence the plaintiff constrained to file this suit.

3.The defendant is directed to file written statement otherwise further steps will taken against the defendant. Defendant called absent, no representation and not turned up to the Court and he was set exparte.

4.To prove the case of the plaintiff, the plaintiff filed his chief examination affidavit on 22.01.2021 and he was examined as PW1 on 29.01.2021. The plaintiff deposed before this Court that he paid

Rs.1,75,000/- under Ex.A1- Promissory note to the defendant. Ex.A1 is

Promissory note, Ex.A2 is the office copy of legal notice dated 20.11.2019 and Ex.A3 is the returned postal cover.

5.Heard arguments on behalf of the plaintiff. Perused the material available on record.Now the point for consideration is:

“Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the suit claim or not?”

POINT:

6.The plaintiff claimed Rs.1,75,000/- under Ex.A1-Promissory note with subsequent interest at the rate of 12% per annum. The evidence of PW1 left unchallenged, his evidence is corroborated with the documentary evidence. Ex.A1 is the Promissory note executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff. Several oral demands made by the plaintiff and issuance of legal notice to the defendant, the defendant neither paid nor replied to the said notice. The unchallenged evidence of PW1 established the case of the plaintiff. Hence, the plaintiff is entitled to the suit claim of

Rs.2,32,516/-. This point is answered accordingly.

7.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs for Rs.2,32,516/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the principal amount of Rs.1,75,000/- from the date of the suit till the date of realization.

Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by her, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 29th day of January, 2021.

PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NELLORE.

O.S.No.31/2020 Dt.29.01.2021

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT:

PW1: Potluri Srinivasulu None (Exparte)

DOCUMENTS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT:

Ex.A1: Promissory note for Rs.1,75,000/-, NIL

dated 04.04.2017

Ex.A2: Office copy of legal notice dated 20.11.2019

Ex.A3: Returned postal cover addressed to the defendant.

PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NELLORE.

OS/139/2020

Sura Padmavathi vs Nagaram Jalaiah alias Suresh

29 Jan 2021

O.S.No.139/2020 Dt.29.01.2021

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE: NELLORE

Present: Sri K.Chakradhara Srinivas,

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

NELLORE.

Friday, this the 29th day of January, 2021

ORIGINAL SUIT No.139 of 2020

Sura Padmavathi, W/o Venkata Reddy, Hindu, Aged about 58 years, House wife R/o Balija Palem Village, N.C. Factory Post,

Dargamitta, Nellore Town ...Plaintiff

Vs.

Nagaram Jalaiah @ Suresh, S/o Subramanyam, Aged about 38 years, Hindu, Auto Driver, R/o Balijapalem village,

N.C. Factory Post, Dargamitta, Nellore Town ...Defendant

This suit coming on 28.01.2021 for hearing before me in the presence of Sri Kudumula Ravi Kumar, Advocate for the plaintiff and the defendant having been called absent and set exparte and upon hearing on behalf of the plaintiff, this Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

The plaintiff filed this suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.20,616/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 24% per annum on the principal amount of Rs.12,000/- borrowed by the defendant under promissory note, dated 01.02.2017 and costs of this suit.

2. The averments of the plaint, in brief, are as follows:-

The defendant in need of money borrowed an amount of

Rs.12,000/- from the plaintiff on 01.02.2017 and got executed the suit promissory note promissing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a.

either to the plaintiff or to his order on demand and delivered the suit promissory note to the plaintiff. Later the plaintiff demanded the defendant for number of times to repay the promissory note amount with interest. But he never paid any amount towards the principal or interest for the suit promissory note. Hence the plaintiff constrained to file this suit. The

O.S.No.139/2020 Dt.29.01.2021

defendant is an Income Tax Assessee and owing a house in Nellore Town and he is not entitled to the benefits of Act IV of 1938.

3.The defendant received the summons from this Court on 09.03.2020 and not turned up to the Court and he was set exparte.

4.To prove the case of the plaintiff, the plaintiff filed his chief examination affidavit on 28.01.2021 and he was examined as PW1 on 28.01.2021. The plaintiff deposed before this Court that he gave

Rs.12,000/- under Ex.A1- Promissory note to the defendant. Ex.A1 is

Promissory note dated 01.02.2017.

5.Heard arguments on behalf of the plaintiff. Perused the material available on record.Now the point for consideration is:

“Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the suit claim or not?”

POINT:

6.The plaintiff claimed Rs.12,000/- under Ex.A1-Promissory note with subsequent interest at the rate of 24% per annum. The evidence of PW1 left unchallenged, his evidence is corroborated with the documentary evidence. Ex.A1 is the Promissory note executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff. Several oral demands made by the plaintiff the defendant did not pay any amount to him. The unchallenged evidence of

PW1 established the case of the plaintiff. Hence, the plaintiff is entitled to the suit claim of Rs.20,616/-. This point is answered accordingly.

7.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs for Rs.20,616/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the principal amount of

Rs.12,000/- from the date of the suit till the date of realization.

Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by her, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 29th day of January, 2021.

PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NELLORE.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT:

PW1: Sura Padmavathi None (Exparte)

O.S.No.139/2020 Dt.29.01.2021

DOCUMENTS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT:

Ex.A1: Promissory note for Rs.12,000/-, NIL

dated 01.02.2017

PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NELLORE.

Order Record 109 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OS/31/2020	Potluri Srinivasulu vs Potluri Lakshmi Prasad	29 Jan 2021	Judgment	—
OS/139/2020	Sura Padmavathi vs Nagaram Jalaiah alias Suresh	29 Jan 2021	Judgment	—
OS/621/2019	M/s. Corporation Bank vs Sada Gopi alias Gopireddy	29 Jan 2021	Judgment	—
OS/1326/2019	V. Srinivasulu Reddy vs Pillella Sridhar	29 Jan 2021	Judgment	—
OS/630/2019	M/s. Corporation Bank vs Veerapareddy Jyothi	28 Jan 2021	Judgment	—
OS/343/2020	Amarthaluru Srinivasulu vs Orugunta Sudhakar	27 Jan 2021	Judgment	—
OS/55/2020	Koduru Venkatesu vs Mogal Aslam Basha	11 Dec 2020	Judgment	—
OS/1/2015	Sk. Babu vs Mareddy Malakondareddy	13 Mar 2020	Judgment	—
OS/4/2015	Illa Venkata Sudhakar vs Mareddy Malakondareddy	13 Mar 2020	Judgment	—
OS/648/2018	Bhumireddy Thirupal Reddy vs Yerriboyina Malleswari	13 Mar 2020	Judgment	—
RCC/22/2019	Shaik Ghouse Mohiddin vs Shaik Rafi Ahamad	13 Mar 2020	Order	—
OS/238/2019	M/s. Corporation Bank vs Madhu Net Centre	12 Mar 2020	Judgment	—
OS/340/2019	M/s. Canara Bank vs Ongole Suresh	12 Mar 2020	Judgment	—
OS/1341/2019	Allam Anupama alias Kumari Anupama vs T. Munilaxmi	06 Mar 2020	Order	—
EP/118/2018	Syed Chand basha vs M.Penchalaiah	03 Mar 2020	Order	—
EP/146/2018	Syed Abdul Basheer vs P.Chandrasekhar	03 Mar 2020	Order	—
EP/259/2019	M/s. Margadarsi Chits Pvt. Ltd. vs Ch. Janardhan Reddy	02 Mar 2020	Order	—
OS/238/2018	Iragaraju Hymavathamma vs Thanneru Seenaiah	13 Feb 2020	Judgment	—
OS/801/2019	Kasa Sudhakar vs Chandavaram Sree Hari	11 Feb 2020	Judgment	—
OS/1167/2019	Shaik Shanwaz vs Dilshad Shaik	10 Feb 2020	Judgment	—
OS/400/2018	AP State Mahindra rural Housing Finance Ltd., rep.by its Authorized signatory., Asst., Manager Chai vs Addanki Ravi	04 Feb 2020	Judgment	—
EP/123/2018	Jangala Sailaja vs Manda Padmavathi	03 Feb 2020	Order	—
EP/250/2019	M/s. Margadarsi Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd vs S.Chandra Sekhar	24 Jan 2020	Order	—
EP/269/2019	Noorsha Khan vs Uthapala Narasimha Charyulu	24 Jan 2020	Order	—
OS/711/2018	Srisilam Subbalakshmi vs Shaik Shakeel Banu	08 Jan 2020	Order	—
OS/567/2019	Thiriveedhi Revathi vs Thuraka Kalyan Babu	03 Jan 2020	Judgment	—
OS/61/2018	Gummadi Srihari vs Dega Srinivasulu	31 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
OS/732/2018	Pyla Masthanaiah vs Lakshmana Nadaru Pulithi Raja	31 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
OS/735/2019	SK. Mohammad Rafi alias Mohammad Rafi vs Nill	31 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
OS/1206/2019	Amara Suneetha vs Menta Leela Pradip	31 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
CC/661/2015	Sanisetty Saroja vs Vsbaliredyd Sudha bharathi	31 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
CC/700143/2016	Vijayanagarm Subramanyam vs B.Balaji singh,	31 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
OS/1114/2009	Salapaka Jyothi Mani vs Vsvelpula Ramakrishna	30 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
OS/465/2019	Gumma Veeranna vs Talluri Venkateswarlu	27 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
OS/548/2017	Iragaboina Jayalakshmi vs Kandala Anilkumar	27 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
OS/912/2019	Lakkamsetty Koteswara Rao vs Kondapi Srinivasa Rao	27 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
CC/700469/2015	Syed Tajuddin vs Shaik Khader Basha	23 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
OS/111/2017	Bhima Punyavathi vs B. Sudha Bharathi	21 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
CC/700118/2016	Ms Potturu Ayyanna Chetty and Company vs Polisetty Bhavani	20 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
EP/200/2019	M/s. Kapil Chits Kosta Pvt. Ltd. vs Swarna. Prasanth Kumar	18 Dec 2019	Order	—
EP/220/2019	M/s. Shriram Chits Pvt. Ltd. vs Dhrjati Nirmala Devi	18 Dec 2019	Order	—
OS/460/2018	Devatha Chenchu Veeraswamy Setty vs Yanamala Rajamannar	18 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
OS/144/2017	Avula Harindra vs Kolla Ramachandra Reddy	17 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
OS/304/2018	Bandi Prakruthi vs Nagalapati Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy	17 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
OS/516/2016	Yathapu Rakeshnadh vs Kamatham Yeswanth	17 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
OS/517/2016	Yathapu Pavani vs Kamatham Yeswanth	17 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
EP/90/2018	Thummala Srinivasulu Reddy vs A.A.V.Sudhakar Rao	16 Dec 2019	Order	—
OS/103/2016	Boggavarapu Indiradevi vs Boddukuru Vanajakshamma	16 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
OS/666/2019	Shaik Ameer Basha vs Alladi Anvesh	16 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
OS/229/2019	Pottepalem Venugopal vs Sompalli. Nagaraju	13 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
OS/630/2017	Vulesey Venkatraju vs Parvatala Sreenivasulu	13 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
OS/747/2019	Bandla Naraiah vs Dodla Madhu Kumar	13 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
EP/343/2018	Gandavarapu Sivaprasad Reddy vs Nalabai Nageswara Rao	12 Dec 2019	Order	—
OS/969/2019	Mannem Ramu vs Kalthireddy Chiranjeevi @ Chiranjeevulu	12 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
OS/394/2018	Maram Ramana Reddy vs Veeradasu Penchala Narasaiah	11 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
OS/32/2019	Penumalli Padma vs Thumu Sujatha	10 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
OS/397/2019	Sadhu Venkata Lakshmivara Prasad Rao vs Katti Venkateswara Rao	10 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
OS/1095/2019	Bondili Sundar Singh vs Veluru Ravindra	06 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
CC/700450/2016	Kalangi subbarao vs Potthuru Somasekhar	06 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
EP/214/2013	Avula Audiraju alias Kumarakrishna vs Yeddanapudi Suman alias Chanti	04 Dec 2019	Order	—
EP/117/2019	Penaka Pattabhirami Reddy vs SK. Shafi	03 Dec 2019	Judgment	—
OS/966/2019	Devisetty Kusuma vs Dasu Sudhakar	27 Nov 2019	Judgment	—
CC/700608/2016	Mallembakam Munidra vs Fazuluddin shaik	27 Nov 2019	Judgment	—
OS/687/2019	Bolla Raghava Rao vs Shaik Allabakshu	18 Nov 2019	Judgment	—
EP/75/2018	Chandragiri Subbamma vs Chandragiri Mohan	30 Oct 2019	Order	—
OS/511/2018	Pindiboina Suman vs Sunkara Murali Krishna alias Murali	25 Oct 2019	Judgment	—
EP/240/2019	Shaik. Sultan Basha vs Syed Saleem @ Shaik Saleem	15 Oct 2019	Order	—
OS/618/2018	Goddati Vajramma vs Srivarapu Subbarathnamma	30 Sep 2019	Judgment	—
OS/43/2013	Vangipudi Usha vs Eduru Sugunamma	30 Aug 2019	Judgment	—
OS/349/2018	Ballem Sandeep vs Munukoti Sivanarayana Durga Prasad	05 Aug 2019	Judgment	—
CC/595/2015	Modem Srinivasulu Reddy vs P.Kadambari	05 Aug 2019	Judgment	—
OS/172/2017	Noorsha Khan vs Pulukuri Sudheer Ranjan Kumar	31 Jul 2019	Judgment	—
RCC/4/2017	Alahari Nagesh vs Duvvuru Saraswathamma @ Saraswathi	30 Jul 2019	Order	—
CC/700096/2016	Mandadi Raghu Ram reddy, vs Nagireddy Ajaykumar reddy	26 Jul 2019	Judgment	—
RCC/5/2019	Chattu Venamma alias Veni vs Sk. Haseena	15 Jul 2019	Order	—
CC/300374/2015	Utukuru Venkateswara Rao vs Parvathala Jhansi	12 Jul 2019	Judgment	—
CC/613/2015	Chella Chinnapareddy vs GangavarapuaVenkataramanareddy	29 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
OS/103/2018	Mavilla Venkatasubbaiah vs Shaik Habeeb Mohammad	28 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
OS/192/2015	Seetha Venkata Subba Rao vs Kandulasetty Venkata Seshaiah	28 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
OS/202/2018	Duvvuru Madhavi vs Guduru Nagaraju	28 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
OS/506/2015	Munuswamy Sekhar vs Darla Audiseshaiah	28 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
OS/533/2017	Shaik Habbeb Mohammad vs Mavilla Venkata Subbaiah	28 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
OS/271/2018	Devalla Ramamma vs Mooli Venkateswara Reddy	27 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
OS/296/2015	Mandadi Narasimhulu vs Uppu Thirupalu	25 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
OS/4/2016	Konjeti Suresh Babu vs Yeddula Vijayalakshmi	24 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
OS/81/2017	Amarthaluru Surendra Babu vs Vema Krishna Rao	24 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
CC/599/2015	A.V.V. Ratnagiri vs Madabushi Pardha Saradhi	24 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
OS/431/2015	Ravipati Venkateswarlu vs Thakkella Radhakrishnaiah	18 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
OS/19/2018	Konidina Ramanamma vs Pothuru Suman	17 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
OS/458/2017	Vangapati Padmajamma vs Ponaka Venkata Sesha Reddy	17 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
OS/331/2016	Bandi Jeeva Ratnamma vs Pundla Manohar Reddy	14 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
OS/443/2017	Vadanala Narayana Rao vs Vadanala Ravindra	14 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
OS/130/2015	Shaik Sattar vs Pattan Masthan Saheb	13 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
OS/361/2014	Syed Hafiz vs Shaik Rafi alias Guddi Rafi	13 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
OS/82/2018	Gandavarapu Srinivasulu vs Jana Srinivasulu	12 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
OS/140/2017	Ande Radhamma vs Thannela Nirmala	12 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
OS/618/2017	P.Chinna Alluru Raju vs Anumalasetty Kalavathi	12 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
OS/115/2018	AP State UCO Bank, Nellore, rep.by its Senior Branch Manager vs Atmakur Siva Krishna	11 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
CC/300607/2014	Bhoomi Reddy Srikanth Reddy vs Muchala Srinivasulu Reddy	11 Jun 2019	Judgment	—
OS/359/2017	Pamuru Sivareddy vs Vemareddy Sudheer Reddy alias Ravi Kiran Sudheer	10 Jun 2019	Judgment	—

Showing 100 of 109 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Jan 2021		6
Dec 2020		1
Mar 2020		11
Feb 2020		5
Jan 2020		4
Dec 2019		37
Nov 2019		3
Oct 2019		3
Sep 2019		1
Aug 2019		3
Jul 2019		5
Jun 2019		26

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Sri K.Chakradhara Srinivas handled?

Sri K.Chakradhara Srinivas has handled 113 court orders since 2018 at Principal District and Sessions Court, Nellore. The average disposal rate is 3 orders per month.

What types of cases does Sri K.Chakradhara Srinivas hear?

Based on available records, Sri K.Chakradhara Srinivas primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Criminal Cases) at Principal District and Sessions Court, Nellore.

Where is Sri K.Chakradhara Srinivas currently posted?

Sri K.Chakradhara Srinivas is posted as Prl.Junior Civil Judge Nellore at Principal District and Sessions Court, Nellore, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Sri K.Chakradhara Srinivas available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Sri K.Chakradhara Srinivas are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Sri K.Chakradhara Srinivas dispose cases?

Sri K.Chakradhara Srinivas disposes approximately 3 cases per month, based on 113 orders handled over their tenure at Principal District and Sessions Court, Nellore.

Since when is Sri K.Chakradhara Srinivas serving?

Sri K.Chakradhara Srinivas has been serving at Principal District and Sessions Court, Nellore since 2018.

Case Types

OS 65%

EP 15%

CC 15%

RCC 4%

Posting History

May 2018 — Jan 2021

Prl.Junior Civil Judge Nellore · 113 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Sri G.Srinivas

Prl.District and Sessions Judge Nellore

793 orders

Sri R.Sarath Babu

I Addl.District and Sessions Judge Nellore

12 orders

Smt G. Geetha

II Addl.District and Sessions Judge cum ACB Judge...

0 orders

Smt P.J. Sudha

III Addl.District and Sessions Judge Nellore

13 orders

Smt. M.Shubha Vani

IV Addl.District and Sessions Judge Nellore

7 orders

Sri Shaik Jani Basha

V Addl.Dist and Sessions cum Spl. SC and ST Judge...

0 orders

A.N. Sailaja

Special Court for trial of Offences against Women-...

4 orders

Smt. Nikitha R.Vora

VI Addl.District and Sessions Judge-Family Court N...

130 orders

Dr I Karuna Kumar

Prl.Senior Civil Judge Nellore

215 orders

Sri S. Srinivas

I Addl.Senior Civil Judge Nellore

579 orders

Gorantla Swathi

Prl.Junior Civil Judge Nellore

545 orders

Sri Pinapati Bharadwaja

I Addl.Junior Civil Judge Nellore

1,953 orders

Abdul Rahaman Shaik

III Addl.Junior Civil Judge Nellore

185 orders

Smt Bv Sulochana Rani

V Addl.Judicial Magistrate Nellore

0 orders

Smt L. Sarada Reddy

II Additional Judicial Magistriate of I Class Nell...

0 orders

Nishad Naaz Shaik

IV Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class Nello...

107 orders

Kampalle Sailaja

Special Judge for Speedy trial of offences under t...

7 orders

Sri P.Sai Ram

Spl.Mobile Court Judge Nellore

0 orders

← View all judges at Principal District and Sessions Court, Nellore