Ms.K.Sailaja

Senior Civil Judge, Rayachoty

V Addl Dist Court Complex Rayachoty · Kadapa · Andhra Pradesh

Ms.K.Sailaja, Senior Civil Judge, Rayachoty, is posted at V Addl Dist Court Complex Rayachoty, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India. 472 court orders on record since 2020. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles H, SC, EP cases.

472

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

H.M.O.P/52/2022

Korlakunta Naganjali and another vs Vsnil

14 Nov 2022

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, RAYACHOTY.

Present:- Ms. Sailaja Kampalle, Senior Civil Judge, Rayachoty. Monday, this the 14th day of November, 2022.

H.M.O.P. No.52 of 2022

1. Korlakunta Naganjali, W/o. Pasupuleti Ashok Kumar, D/o. Late Korlakunta

Nagaraja, aged 21 years, housewife, Hindu, residing at Door No.38/27-B,

Mittameedapalli Village, H/o.Rayavaram, T.Sundupalli Mandal, Y.S.R. District.

2. Pasupuleti Ashok Kumar, S/o.P.Subbaiah, aged 26 years, Hindu, residing at 2/170-B, Obulampalli Village, Chennuru Mandal, Kadapa District, now residing at Kothapeta, Rayachoty Town & Mandal, Y.S.R. District.

... Petitioners

V/s.

NIL … Respondent

This petition is coming on this day for hearing before me in the presence of Sri P.Sreenivasulu, Advocate for the petitioners, upon perusing the petition and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court made the following:-

O R D E R

This petition is filed by both the petitioners i.e., wife and husband under

Sec.13-B Hindu Marriage Act for seeking dissolution of their marriage dated 10.08.2020 by way of granting decree of divorce on their mutual consent.

2.The case of the petitioners as per their petition, in brief, is as follows:

Both the petitioners are legally wedded wife and husband. Their marriage was solemnized on 10.08.2020 at Anjaneyaswamy Temple near

Gowthami theatre, Galiveedu Road, Rayachoty Town and Mandal, Kadapa

District as per Hindu rites and customs prevailed in their community. Both side elders and village elders attended their marriage. All the marriage expenses were borned by parents of the 2nd petitioner. Thereafter their marriage was consummated. While so, after few days the 1st petitioner demanded the 2nd petitioner that she wants to live at her parents house along with the 2nd petitioner and the 2nd petitioner has to act as Illatam Alludu.

Further the 1st petitioner is suffering with epilepsy and in order to get the 2nd petitioner as Illatam Alludu she started to cause mental agony to him by using sward words towards him. It leads to ego problem between the couple.

ii) Further unfortunately they were not blessed with children and they lived happily only for a period of three months after the marriage. Thereafter though petitioners lived for a period of six months at Rayachoty town there were frequent quarrels among them and they became unable to adjust with each other. Since their marriage is an arranged marriage both side elders tried their level best through mediations for their reunion but the there is no use of those mediations. Both the petitioners expressed their inability to live together, on that, elders advised them to get a permanent solution for their problem through Court of Law. Hence, they decided to get divorce on their mutual consent. Accordingly they went for financial terms. The 2nd petitioner paid Rs.1,00,000/- to the 1st petitioner towards her full and final settlement.

Under these circumstances they obliged to file this petition.

3.During the course of reconciliation both the petitioners expressed their unwillingness to live together, hence reconciliation is not effected.

4.During the course of enquiry, both the petitioners No.1 and 2 themselves got examined as PWs.1 & 2 respectively and got marked Exs.P1 to P5 through 1st petitioner. Since the petition is filed on mutual consent of both the petitioners there is no respondents.

5.Heard the counsel for petitioners and perused the material available on record.

6.Now the points for consideration are:

1. Whether the petitioners No.1 & 2 are able to prove their case to get the relief of decree of divorce ?

2. To what relief ?

7. POINT NO.1 :-

In order to prove their case, both the petitioners gave their evidence as P.Ws.1 and 2 respectively. Both of them in one voice reiterated their case as mentioned by them in their petition. The Exs.P.1 to P.5 are notarized affidavit of the 1st petitioner showing their date of marriage as 10.08.2020,

Wedding invitation card in respect of their marriage, marriage photograph of both petitioners, attested photostat copy of aadhar cards of both the petitioners. Since there are no respondents, the evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2 became unchallenged.

ii) Their evidence goes to show that their marriage was took place on 10.08.2020 as per Hindu rites and customs in the presence of elders of both sides and village elders. Thereafter their marriage was consummated but unfortunately the couple not blessed by children. After the marriage both of them lived happily only for a period of three months. Thereafter the 1st petitioner started to demand the 2nd petitioner to live as a “Illitam Alludu” in her parents house, for that the 2nd petitioner refused. On that ego problems started between the couple and the 1st petitioner used to treat the 2nd petitioner with a harsh manner and used unwarranted comments on him.

iii) Further, the 1st petitioner is suffering from Epilepsy. It is also caused a reason for the disturbances among the couple. Due to the misunderstandings between the couple they became unable to adjust with each other and they decided to take divorce. Since their marriage is an arranged marriage both sides elders tried their level best to reunion the couple by their mediations but those mediations were failed as the couple expressed their unwillingness to live together. On that on the advise of elders, the 2nd petitioner paid Rs.1,00,000/- to the 1st petitioner towards her permanent alimony and the same was agreed and received by the 1st petitioner.

4 iv) Therefore by considering all these facts and evidence on record, this court is of the considered opinion that the marriage of the petitioners was damaged beyond repairs and even if they are continue in marital tie, the purpose of marriage would not be served, hence it is a fit case to grant divorce. Accordingly, this point is answered.

8.Point No.2 :

In the result, this petition is allowed by dissolving the marriage of the petitioners No.1 and 2 which was took place on 10.08.2020 by granting decree of divorce.

Dictated to the Stenographer Grade-III, transcribed by him, corrected

and pronounced by me in the open court this the 14th day of November, 2022.

Sd/- Sailaja Kampalle

Senior Civil Judge,

Rayachoty.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined for the petitioner:

P.W.1: P. Naganjali

P.W.2: P. Ashok Kumar

Witnesses examined for the respondent:

- NIL -

Exhibits marked for the petitioners:

Ex.P.1: Notarized affidavit of petitioners showing their date of marriage as 10.08.2020.

Ex.P.2: Wedding invitation card in respect of marriage of both the petitioners.

Ex.P3: Marriage photograph of both petitioners.

Ex.P4: Attested photostat copy of aadhar card of the 1st petitioner.

Ex.P5: Attested photostat copy of aadhar card of second petitioner.

Exhibits marked for the respondent :

- NIL -

Id/- S.K. S.C.J., Rcty.

H.M.O.P/48/2022

Bukke Hanuman Naik and another vs Vsnil

11 Nov 2022

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, RAYACHOTY.

Present:- Ms. Sailaja Kampalle, Senior Civil Judge, Rayachoty. Friday, this the 11th day of November, 2022

H.M.O.P. No.48 of 2022

1. Bukke Hanuman Naik, S/o. Bukke Reddy Naik, Hindu, aged 30 years,

Resident of Door No.5/115, Kuravapalli, Mudumpadu Village, Annamayya

District.

2. Dharavath Sitha, W/o. Bukke Hanuman Naik, aged 25 years, Door

No.5/115, Kuravapalli, Mudumpadu Village, Annamayya District.

... Petitioners

V/s.

NIL … Respondent

This petition is coming on 10.11.2022 for hearing before me in the presence of Sri K.Raja Kumar Raju, Advocate for the petitioners, upon perusing the petition and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court made the following:-

O R D E R

This petition is filed by both the petitioners i.e., wife and husband under

Sec.13-B Hindu Marriage Act for seeking divorce on their mutual consent by dissolving their marriage dated 17.12.2020.

2.The case of the petitioners as per their petition, in brief, is as follows:

The petitioners are legally wedded wife and husband. Their marriage was solemnized on 17.12.2020 as per Hindu rites and customs at Krishna

Veterinary Association Hall, Opposite Indira Gandhi Municipal Stadium beside

Vijayawada. After the marriage, both the petitioners lived together for a period of three months. Thus, their marriage was consummated. Thereafter severe disputes arose between them and on that both of them started to live separately from each other’s company. Even during the 1st three months of their marital life, they were not lived happily as there were frequent quarrels among them and they became unable to adjust with each other. Since, the 2 marriage of petitioners is an arranged marriage, both side elders tried their level best through mediations for nearly four or five times but they could not able to reunion the petitioners. In those mediations both the petitioners voluntarily expressed that they are unable to live together, on that the elders advised them to get permanent solution in order to lead their future peacefully. On that both the petitioners decided to get the divorce on their mutual consent. As per the terms of elders, the 1st petitioner agreed to pay

Rs.4,50,000/- to the 2nd petitioner towards her full and final settlement. The 2nd petitioner also agreed and received the same. There is no collusion between both the parties in getting this decree of divorce only for the reason that there is serious misunderstandings and no chance of compromise between them, they obliged to file this petition.

3.During the course of reconciliation both the petitioners expressed their unwillingness to lead marital life together as wife and husband, hence reconciliation is not effected.

4.During the course of enquiry, both the petitioners No.1 and 2 themselves got examined as PWs.1 & 2 respectively and Exs.P1 to P5 were marked through P.W.1. Since the petition is filed on mutual consent of both the petitioners there are no respondents and there is no adverse evidence for the case of petitioners.

5.Heard the counsel for petitioners and perused the material available on record.

6.Now the points for consideration are:

1. Whether the petitioners No.1 & 2 are able to prove their case to get the decree of divorce ?

2. To what relief ?

7. POINT NO.1 :-

In order to prove their case, both the petitioners gave their evidence as P.Ws.1 and 2 respectively. Exs.P.1 to P.5 i.e., their marriage invitation card, their marriage photographs, marriage certificated dated 18.02.2021 issued by Sub Registrar, T. Sundupalli and the attested photostat copies of aadhar cards of both the parties were marked respectively.

ii) As seen from the evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2, both the petitioners in one voice deposed about their misunderstandings and their terms of compromise that the 1st petitioner paid Rs.4,50,000/- to the 2nd petitioner towards her permanent alimony and they decided to go for divorce on their mutual consent. As seen from the evidence of both the petitioners, it is clear that their marriage was took place on 17.12.2020 as per Hindu rites and customs. Thereafter they lived together only for a period of three months, after that three months due to severe misunderstandings arose between them they started to live separately and even that three months period also they were unable to adjust with each other.

iii) It is further clear from their evidence that since their marriage is an arranged marriage, both side elders tried their level best to get them reunion but their efforts were failed and both the petitioners decided to go for divorce on their mutual consent, hence they obliged to file this petition.

iv) It is further clear that the 1st petitioner agreed and paid an amount of Rs.4,50,000/- to the 2nd petitioner towards her permanent alimony.

Therefore by considering these facts of the case and evidence on record, this

Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioner’s marriage was damaged beyond repairs and there is no chance for their reunion in future, hence this is a fit case for granting divorce. Accordingly, this point is answered in favour of the petitioners.

8.Point No.2 :

In the result, this petition is allowed by dissolving the marriage of the petitioners which was took place on 17.12.2020 by granting decree of divorce.

Dictated to the Stenographer Grade-III, transcribed by him, corrected

and pronounced by me in the open court this the 11th day of November, 2022.

Sd/- Sailaja Kampalle

Senior Civil Judge,

Rayachoty.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined for the petitioner:

P.W.1: Bukke Hanuman Naik

P.W.2: Daravath Sitha

Witnesses examined for the respondent:

- NIL -

Exhibits marked for the petitioners:

Ex.P1: Wedding invitation card in respect of marriage of both the petitioners.

Ex.P2: Wedding photograph of petitioners.

Ex.P.3: Marriage certificate dated 18.02.2021 issued by the Sub Registrar,

T.Sundupalli.

Ex.P.4: Attested photostat copy of Aadhar cards of 1st petitioner

Ex.P5: Attested photostat copy of Aadhar cards of 2nd petitioner

Exhibits marked for the respondent :

- NIL -

Id/- S.K. S.C.J., Rcty.

H.M.O.P/9/2022 Dismissed As Not Pressed Disposal Date: 14-11-2022

C.Sreevani @ Vani vs C.Dileep KUmar Reddy

14 Nov 2022

EP/37/2018 Terminated Disposal Date: 09-11-2022

The Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank, T.Sundupalli vs Peddinenikalva Viswanada Reddy Died his Lrs Peddinenikalva Sesidhar Reddy

09 Nov 2022

OS/19/2022 Settled Before Lok Adalat

Sarvani Rahamathulla Khan vs Nyazi Ansar Ali Khan and 2 others

12 Nov 2022

Order Record 470 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
H.M.O.P/9/2022	C.Sreevani @ Vani vs C.Dileep KUmar Reddy	14 Nov 2022	Order	Dismissed As Not Pressed Disposal Date: 14-11-2022
H.M.O.P/52/2022	Korlakunta Naganjali and another vs Vsnil	14 Nov 2022	Order	—
OS/19/2022	Sarvani Rahamathulla Khan vs Nyazi Ansar Ali Khan and 2 others	12 Nov 2022	Order	Settled Before Lok Adalat
H.M.O.P/48/2022	Bukke Hanuman Naik and another vs Vsnil	11 Nov 2022	Order	—
EP/37/2018	The Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank, T.Sundupalli vs Peddinenikalva Viswanada Reddy Died his Lrs Peddinenikalva Sesidhar Reddy	09 Nov 2022	Order	Terminated Disposal Date: 09-11-2022
H.M.O.P/33/2022	Bandrevu Venugopal and another vs Vsnil	09 Nov 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/40/2022	Derangula Raj Kumar @ Raja and another vs Vsnil	04 Nov 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/45/2022	Veeraballi Harinadha and another vs Vsnil	04 Nov 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/46/2022	Routhu Reddy Rani and another vs Vsnil	04 Nov 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/54/2021	Gangireddygari Dharma Reddy vs Gangireddy Sireesha @ Peddy Reddy Ramya	04 Nov 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/55/2022	Thatireddy Maheswaramma vs Thatireddy Varada Reddy	03 Nov 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/25/2022	Galiveeti Ramesh Reddy vs Galiveeti Lakshmi Shirisha @ Shirisha	28 Oct 2022	Order	—
IP/13/2020	Somavarapu Bhargavachari vs Bathina Ramgamma and 13 others	27 Oct 2022	Order	—
S.O.P/1/2014	Kurrapothula Dharma vs Derangula Venkataramana	20 Oct 2022	Order	—
SC/319/2019	State represented by the Inspector of Police vs Chintham Balaji Reddy	19 Oct 2022	Judgement	—
OS/74/2017	V.Sai Rajeswari vs M. Rama krishna Reddy	17 Oct 2022	Judgement	—
OS/75/2017	G. Kumari vs M Rama Krishna Reddy	17 Oct 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/6/2022	B.Manikanta Naik vs M.Sindhuja	15 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/35/2022	Kokkanti Sravani and another vs Vsnil	13 Oct 2022	Order	—
EP/7/2020	G.Pasam Lakshmi Narayana vs Patakarla Raghuram and others13	12 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/59/2022	Bale Manikanta vs Mugi Reddy Rani	12 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/37/2020	V.Sreenivasulu Reddy vs Valluru Sai Lakshmi	11 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/62/2022	Bojanapu Vijaya Bhaskar vs Rebba Sneha	11 Oct 2022	Order	—
SC/246/2021	Inspector of Police, Rayachoty U/G PS vs Khathif Syed Raziluddin (A.1)	10 Oct 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/30/2022	Bandrevu Venkateswarlu and another vs Vsnil	10 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/31/2022	Udayagiri Mahidhar and another vs Vsnil	10 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/47/2019	B.Ravindra Kumar Naik vs Smt Mode Sreelatha Bai	10 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/42/2022	Gaddam Somi Reddy vs Gaddam Siva Jyothi	28 Sep 2022	Order	—
IP/10/2018	Tirupati Jagannadha vs Shaik Ahammad Basha @ Chota and 9 others	27 Sep 2022	Order	—
OS/17/2021	Shaik Athika Be vs Shaik Aliya Bee and o4 others	27 Sep 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/3/2022	Budda Maheswari @ D. Nageswari and Degala Sreehari vs Vsnil	21 Sep 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/48/2021	Mude Ravindra Naik and another vs Nill	21 Sep 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/53/2022	Nune Sravanthi vs Akula Mallikarjuna	21 Sep 2022	Order	—
EP/10/2020	D.Ramamuthy Reddy vs S.Shamsheer	20 Sep 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/24/2022	Goddindla Mahadeva and another vs Vsnil	20 Sep 2022	Order	—
EP/13/2021	R. Venkatrami reddy vs B. Subba Reddy	19 Sep 2022	Order	—
SC/28/2022	Sub Inspector of police, Sambepalli P.S. vs Yadagiri Malliah @ Sayammagari Chinna Mallaiah	19 Sep 2022	Judgement	—
SC/504/2019	SHO LAKKIREDDY PALLI P.S vs Shaik Rasool bee and Others 2	19 Sep 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/11/2022	Siddaramanjulu Naidu vs Sidda Malleswaramma @ Malleswari	16 Sep 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/30/2017	Sankalala Pichi Raju vs Kaveti Subbamma	16 Sep 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/39/2019	Dande Giri Prasad vs Dande Swathi	16 Sep 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/69/2022	Routhu Sivaiah vs Routhu Rama Subbamma	15 Sep 2022	Order	—
OS/8/2018	Mandla Reddenna vs Konnipati Venkateswarlu	14 Sep 2022	Judgement	—
SC/198/2020	SHO VEERABALLI P.S vs Mude Sudhakar Naik	14 Sep 2022	Judgement	—
EP/4/2022	Kamballi Ramachandra vs Maddimala Subbaramaiah(died) and his LRs	13 Sep 2022	Order	—
EP/18/2019	Vandadi Lakshmi Devi vs Bhavamasi Venkata Lakshumma	13 Sep 2022	Order	—
OS/12/2012	suram Lakshmi Devi vs Murikinati Reddy prasad Reddy	13 Sep 2022	Judgement	—
SC/86/2020	SHO RAYACHOTY P.S vs Alamuri Sivarama Naidu	13 Sep 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/14/2020	Manchinti Hemavathi vs K Rajasekhar Reddy	13 Sep 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/23/2022	Kovvuru Malleswari vs Elukunta Reddysiva @ Chinna Reddappa	13 Sep 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/46/2016	Nallamala sudharshan vs Nallamala Aruna	13 Sep 2022	Order	—
EP/32/2018	K. Sankaraiah vs Kayam Khani Shamivulla Khan	09 Sep 2022	Order	—
OS/14/2018	Tangala Venkateswarlu and 3 others vs Gotlamitta Sreenivasulu Reddy	09 Sep 2022	Order	—
EP/6/2021	Sankavaram Gangadhar vs Seelam Krishnaiah	08 Sep 2022	Order	—
SC/234/2021	SI of police Rayachoty U/G PS vs Deshmukh Isran Ali Khan @ Isran,	07 Sep 2022	Judgement	—
EP/27/2018	K. Prasad Reddy vs Shika Riyaz Ahammad	30 Aug 2022	Order	—
EP/28/2018	Koneri Sahadeva Reddy vs Shaik Riyaz Ahammad	30 Aug 2022	Order	—
SC/230/2021	SI of Police, T. Sundupalli, PS vs Koppu Venkata Ramana @ Ramana	30 Aug 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/19/2022	Rathikota Nagaveni vs Nil	30 Aug 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/28/2019	B.Kalyan Kumar vs S.Priya	29 Aug 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/54/2022	Ankamreddy Tejasree vs Tatigutla Karunakar Reddy	29 Aug 2022	Order	—
EP/5/2021	Sunkesula Raja Reddy vs Prakasamjala Rajanna	25 Aug 2022	Order	—
SC/246/2020	SHO LAKKIREDDYPALLI P.S vs Veeraballi Nagendra and another	25 Aug 2022	Judgement	—
EP/8/2020	Chintham Sreenivasa Reddy vs K.Ambedkar	24 Aug 2022	Order	—
EP/34/2018	M/s. Shriram Chits Privstr Ltd., Rayachoty Branch vs G. Venkata Ramana and 3 others	24 Aug 2022	Order	—
IP/8/2021	Mayana Riyaz Ahamed Khan vs Kethineni Naidu and others 22	24 Aug 2022	Order	—
SC/186/2021	SHO Rayachoty vs Shaik Khadirun (A.1)	24 Aug 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/75/2021	Kallapu Venakta Radha Kumari vs Kallapu Venkateswarlu	24 Aug 2022	Order	—
S.O.P/1/2021	Gottiveeti Sreeramulu and an other vs NIl	24 Aug 2022	Order	—
S.O.P/3/2022	Shaik Sorakayalapeta Shaheena vs Shaik Murasha Vali	24 Aug 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/8/2021	Gounipalli Lakshmi Devi vs Gounipalli Nageswara	23 Aug 2022	Order	—
EP/6/2022	Buddachenchannagari Venkatadri vs Dandu Balaji	22 Aug 2022	Order	—
OS/41/2017	P.Asha vs Sunkara Jamal Valli	22 Aug 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/36/2020	Dr. Kasi Reddy Rama Prathap Reddy vs Dr. Changanuru Vasudha Reddy	22 Aug 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/41/2020	Mandem Siva Bharathi vs Maredapalli Vasu Prasad	22 Aug 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/60/2022	Palleni Pushpavathi vs Marripati Hari Babu	22 Aug 2022	Order	—
SC/21/2015	S.H.O.,Veeraballi P.S. vs Ramaswami Murugeshan	10 Aug 2022	Judgement	—
SC/112/2017	SHO T.Sundupali P.S vs Lakkrireddipalli Sreeramulu	10 Aug 2022	Judgement	—
SC/118/2017	SHo Veeraballi P.S vs Tanuku Devendra	10 Aug 2022	Judgement	—
SC/302/2014	S.H.O. T.Sundupalli P.S. vs Annamalai Aligation	10 Aug 2022	Judgement	—
SC/306/2019	State represented by the CI of Police, Mydukur(U/G) P.S vs Shaik akbar Ali	10 Aug 2022	Judgement	—
SC/513/2019	SHO SAMBEPALLI P.S vs Syed Nadeem @ Kalu	10 Aug 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/1/2022	Bukya @ Bukke Soma Sekhar Naik vs Mude Srithulasi @ Nipuna.	08 Aug 2022	Order	—
EP/28/2017	D.S. Reddy lakshmi vs Kakularam Subba Reddy	04 Aug 2022	Order	—
SC/79/2021	Sub Inspector of Police, Lakkireddi Palli P.S. vs Nareddy Visweswar Reddy (A.1) and an other	02 Aug 2022	Judgement	—
SC/295/2019	State Represented by the Sub-Inspectior for Police, Chinnamandem P.S vs Vallapu Ayyappa	25 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
SC/8/2021	F.R.O. SANIPAYA RANGE vs K. Rajeev Gandhi	23 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
SC/19/2022	SHO Chinnamandem PS vs Eelugu Gangaiah (A.1)	23 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
SC/31/2021	FRO Sanipaya Range vs Guriginjakunta Bhaskar Naidu (A.1) and 4 others	23 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
SC/33/2021	SHO CHAKRAYAPETA P.S vs Policherla Ravi Prasad and 2 others	23 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
SC/43/2021	SHO VEERABALLI P.S vs A.3.Patchikunta Annamaya.	23 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
SC/49/2021	F.R.O. SANIPAYA RANGE vs Kuppuswamy Sivaji (A.1) and 7 others.	23 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
SC/64/2022	SHO T.Sundupalli PS vs Govindu Suresh @ Suri	23 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
SC/72/2021	F.R.O. Rayachoty Range vs Chandru Murugan (A.1) and 2 others	23 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
SC/85/2020	SHO RAYACHOTY P.S vs Kalvakunta Dora swamy	23 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
SC/96/2021	F.R.O. Sanipaya vs Madithati Venkataramana @ Babu (A.1)	23 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
SC/102/2021	FRO SANIPAYA RANGE vs Satya Mohan	23 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
SC/121/2020	SHO VEERABALLI P.S vs Mude Venkatamallu Naidu @ Venkatamalliah Naidu and another	23 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
SC/139/2021	FRO Sanipaya Range vs C. Annamalai	23 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
SC/140/2021	FRO Sanipaya Range vs D. Vengadeshan	23 Jul 2022	Judgement	—

Showing 100 of 470 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Nov 2022		11
Oct 2022		16
Sep 2022		28
Aug 2022		30
Jul 2022		47
Jun 2022		27
May 2022		20
Apr 2022		17
Mar 2022		33
Feb 2022		3
Jan 2022		19
Dec 2021		47

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Ms.K.Sailaja handled?

Ms.K.Sailaja has handled 472 court orders since 2020 at V Addl Dist Court Complex Rayachoty. The average disposal rate is 17 orders per month.

What types of cases does Ms.K.Sailaja hear?

Based on available records, Ms.K.Sailaja primarily handles Civil matters (Execution Petitions, Original Suits) and Criminal matters (Sessions Cases, Criminal Cases) at V Addl Dist Court Complex Rayachoty.

Where is Ms.K.Sailaja currently posted?

Ms.K.Sailaja is posted as Senior Civil Judge, Rayachoty at V Addl Dist Court Complex Rayachoty, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Ms.K.Sailaja available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Ms.K.Sailaja are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Ms.K.Sailaja dispose cases?

Ms.K.Sailaja disposes approximately 17 cases per month, based on 472 orders handled over their tenure at V Addl Dist Court Complex Rayachoty.

Since when is Ms.K.Sailaja serving?

Ms.K.Sailaja has been serving at V Addl Dist Court Complex Rayachoty since 2020.

Case Types

H 38%

SC 23%

EP 17%

OS 13%

IP 8%

S 1%

CC 0%

Posting History

Jul 2020 — Nov 2022

Senior Civil Judge, Rayachoty · 472 orders

Outcomes on Record

Dismissed As Not Pressed Disposal Date: 14-11-2022 1

Settled Before Lok Adalat 1

Terminated Disposal Date: 09-11-2022 1

Other Judges at this Court

Smt.E.Prasuna

Senior Civil Judge, Rayachoty

626 orders

Sri T.Suyodhan

Principal Junior Civil Judge Rayachoty

113 orders

Ms Nuthanaganti Tejaswini

Additional Junior Civil Judge Rayachoty

0 orders

Smt.c.r.sumalatha

V Additional District Judge, Rayachoty

0 orders

← View all judges at V Addl Dist Court Complex Rayachoty

Ms.K.Sailaja

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, RAYACHOTY.

O R D E R

Rayachoty.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, RAYACHOTY.

O R D E R

Rayachoty.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Daily Status

Daily Status