Smt.Kavitha Karnati

Prl. Junior Civil Judges Court, Gadwal

Jogulamba Gadwal, PDJ Court Complex · Jogulamba Gadwal · Telangana

Smt.Kavitha Karnati, Prl. Junior Civil Judges Court, Gadwal, is posted at Jogulamba Gadwal, PDJ Court Complex, Jogulamba Gadwal, Telangana, India. 675 court orders on record since 2021. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles STC, OS, CC cases.

675

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

OS/128/2020

Rudragoud @ Radrappa Gouda vs Veeranna Goud

04 Aug 2022

1 OS.No.128 of 2020

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT GADWAL

Dated this the 04th day of August, 2022.

PRESENT:- SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI,

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GADWAL.

Original Suit No. 128 of 2020.

BETWEEN:- Rudra Gouda @ Rudrappa Gouda S/o Veerupanna Gouda, aged about:62 Years, Occ:Agriculture and Business, R/o H.No.1-4-63, Goods Shed Road, Raichur Taluq and Raichur District.

… Plaintiff.

AND

Veeranna Gouda S/o Shiva Reddy, age:45 Years, Occ:Agriculture, R/o Induvasi Village of Ghattu Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District. … Defendant.

Claim:Suit for Recovery of Money of Rs.19,44,000/- under Order VII Rule 1 and 2 Read with Section 26 of C.P.C.

This suit is coming before me for final hearing on 04-08-2022 in the presence of Sri.R.Raghu Rami Reddy, Counsel for the Plaintiff and Sri. B.Thimmaiah Gupa, Counsel for the Defendant, upon hearing the counsel for Plaintiff, perusal of the material on record, and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, the court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

This is a suit filed under Order VII Rule 1 and 2 read with section 26 of Code of Civil Procedure by the Plaintiff for recovery of amount of

Rs.19,44,000/- along with interest at the rate of Rs.2/- per hundred per month from the date of filing of the suit till realization and to grant any other appropriate reliefs in the interest of justice.

2. The brief averments of the Plaint are as follows:

2.1 The Plaintiff and Defendant are relatives and well known to each other. Basing on such acquaintance the Defendant approached the Plaintiff and requested to borrow an amount of Rs.12,00,000/- (Rupees Twelve Lakh only) for his family, domestic, repayment of loan and further for

SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI [Prl.JCJ] 2 OS.No.128 of 2020 development of agricultural necessities. On the request of the Defendant the

Plaintiff lent an amount of Rs.12,00,000/- (Rupees Twelve Lakh only) on 05- 08-2017 to the Defendant. After receiving the said amount the Defendant executed two promissory notes (each Six Lakh Rupees only) in favour of the

Plaintiff on the same day and agreed to pay the interest at Rs.2/- per month per hundred and return the same on demand.

2.2 The Plaintiff further submitted that the Defendant failed to pay either interest or Principal to the Plaintiff, even after making several demands to the Defendant to pay the same. But the Defendant went on postponing the payment with one or other pretext and he is trying to evade the due amount with interest to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff further submitted that despite having sufficient means to discharge the debt at once the

Defendant have been evading the payment without valid reason or cause.

So, finally on 08-03-2020 the Plaintiff demanded the Defendant to pay the entire due amount. Having no other alternative the Plaintiff approached the court for the recovery of money against the Defendant. Hence the suit.

3. After numbering of the suit, summons were issued to Defendant.

After service of summons, on behalf of the Defendant Sri. B.Thimmaiah

Gupta, Advocate filed Vakalath and sought time for filing Written Statement but no Written Statement was filed. After lapse of statutory period for filing

Written Statement, the right of filing Written Statement by Defendant was forfeited and the Defendant was set Ex-parte.

4. On behalf of the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff himself got examined as

PW-1 and got exhibited Ex.A1 to Ex.A11 and one Ussain Sab who is third party to the suit got examined as PW-2.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the Plaintiff and perused the record.

SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI [Prl.JCJ] 3 OS.No.128 of 2020

6. Now the point for consideration is “Whether this suit is entitled to be decreed as prayed for”?

7. P O I N T: The brief facts of the case are that the Plaintiff and

Defendant are relatives and well known to each other. Basing on such acquaintance the Defendant approached the Plaintiff and requested to borrow an amount of Rs.12,00,000/- (Rupees Twelve Lakh only) for his family, domestic, repayment of loan and further for development of agricultural necessities. On the request of the Defendant the Plaintiff lent an amount of Rs.12,00,000/- (Rupees Twelve Lakh only) on 05-08-2017 to the

Defendant. After receiving the said amount the Defendant executed two promissory notes (each Six Lakh Rupees only) in favour of the Plaintiff on the same day and agreed to pay the interest at Rs.2/- per month per hundred and return the same on demand. The Plaintiff further submitted that the Defendant failed to pay either interest or Principal to the Plaintiff, even after making several demands to the Defendant to pay the same. But the Defendant went on postponing the payment with one or other pretext and he is trying to evade the due amount with interest to the Plaintiff. The

Plaintiff further submitted that despite having sufficient means to discharge the debt at once the Defendant have been evading the payment without valid reason or cause. So, finally on 08-03-2020 the Plaintiff demanded the

Defendant to pay the entire due amount. Having no other alternative the

Plaintiff approached the court for the recovery of money against the

Defendant. With the above pleadings the Plaintiff got examined himself as

PW-1 and got exhibited Ex.A1 to Ex.A11. Ex.A1 is Original Promissory note for Rs.6,00,000/, dt:05-08-2017 executed by the Defendant in favour of the

Plaintiff, Ex.A2 is true translation of promissory note from Kannada

Language to English by Advocate Notary, dt:12-06-2020, Ex.A3 is Original

SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI [Prl.JCJ] 4 OS.No.128 of 2020

Promissory note for Rs.6,00,000/, dt:05-08-2017 executed by the Defendant in favour of the Plaintiff, Ex.A4 is true translation of promissory note from

Kannada Language to English by Advocate Notary, dt:12-06-2020, Ex.A5 is computerized ROR, dt:10-03-2020, Ex.A6 is Pahani for the Fasli No.2019 in survey number 209, dt:10-03-2020, Ex.A7 is Pahani for the Fasli No.2019 in survey number 246/4a, dt:10-03-2020, Ex.A8 is Pahani for the Fasli

No.2019 in survey number 247/1a, dt:10-03-2020, Ex.A9 is Pahani for the

Fasli No.2019 in survey number 247/2a, dt:10-03-2020, Ex.A10 is Pahani for the Fasli No.2019 in survey number 249/1a, dt:10-03-2020 and Ex.A11 is encumbrance certificate, dt:06-03-2020.

8. The Evidence of PW-1 and the contents of Ex.A1 to Ex.A11 are showing the burden on the shoulders of the Defendant, as the case of the

Plaintiff is establishing through his pleadings and Exhibits A1 to A11 that the

Defendant has borrowed Rs.12,00,000/- by executing Ex.A1 and Ex.A3. It is not the case of the Defendant here that he has no knowledge about the suit, since the summons to Defendant are successfully served on him. But till now the Defendant has not taken any steps to come on record and contest the matter. It all showing that the Defendant is having knowledge about the institution of the suit. In the above circumstances the evidence of PW-1 and the contents of Exhibits A1 to A11 are remained unchallenged and unshakened and proved the case of the Plaintiff. Point is agreed accordingly.

9. In the Result, the suit is decreed with costs, in favour of the

Plaintiff and against the Defendant by directing him to pay a sum of

Rs.19,44,000/- to the Plaintiff. Further the Defendant is directed to pay interest amount at the rate of 12 % per annum from the date of filing the suit till the date of Decree and 6 % per annum from the date of decree till the date of realization on the principal amount of Rs.12,00,000/-.

SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI [Prl.JCJ] 5 OS.No.128 of 2020

Typed to my dictation by Typist, corrected and pronounced by me in open court on this the 04th day of August, 2022.

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GADWAL.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESS EXAMINED

For Plaintiff: For Defendant:

PW-1 : Rudragouda @ Rudrappa Gouda - None- PW-2 : Ussain Sab

EXHIBITS MARKED

For the Plaintiff:

Ex.A1:Original Promissory note for Rs.6,00,000/, dt:05-08-2017executed by the Defendant in favour of the Plaintiff, : True translation of promissory note from Kannada Language to Ex.A2 English by Advocate Notary, dt:12-06-2020, : Original Promissory note for Rs.6,00,000/, dt:05-08-2017 executed Ex.A3 by the Defendant in favour of the Plaintiff, : True translation of promissory note from Kannada Language to Ex.A4 English by Advocate Notary, dt:12-06-2020, : Computerized ROR, dt:10-03-2020, Ex.A5 : Pahani for the Fasli No.2019 in survey number 209, dt:10-03- Ex.A6 2020, : Pahani for the Fasli No.2019 in survey number 246/4a, dt:10-03- Ex.A7 2020, : Pahani for the Fasli No.2019 in survey number 247/1a, dt:10-03- Ex.A8 2020, : Pahani for the Fasli No.2019 in survey number 247/2a, dt:10-03- Ex.A9 2020, : Pahani for the Fasli No.2019 in survey number 249/1a, dt:10-03- Ex.A10 2020, : Encumbrance certificate, dt:06-03-2020. Ex.A11

For the Defendant: - Nil –

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

GADWAL.

SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI [Prl.JCJ] 6 OS.No.128 of 2020

DECREE

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT GADWAL

PRESENT:- SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI,

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GADWAL.

DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021.

Original Suit No. 124 OF 2021.

BETWEEN:- K.Brahmaiah Achari S/o K.Chinna Narsimhulu, age:39 Years, Occ:Agriculture and Carpenter, R/o Bijwaram Village, Maldakal Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District. … Plaintiff.

AND

M.Venkata Swamy S/o M.Thimmoji, age:50 Years, Occ:Business, R/o Pypadu Village and Post, Vaddepalli Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District. … Defendant.

SUIT CLAIM:- The suit is valued Rs.16,440/- basing on promissory note.

PLAINT PRESENTED ON:24-03-2021. PLAINT FILED ON:24-03-2021.

VALUATION: The suit claim is valued at Rs.16,440/- for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction and a court fee of Rs.1,176/- was paid under section 20 (C) of A.P.C.F and S.V.Act.

CAUSE OF ACTION: The cause of action for the suit arose on 15-06-2018 at Bijwaram Village, Maldakal Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District.

This suit coming before me for final hearing in the presence of

Sri.A.Rahamathulla Baig, counsel for Plaintiff and the Defendant was set exparte and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this court doth order and decree as follows:-

1.That the suit of the Plaintiff be and hereby is decreed without costs

and

2.That the Defendant do pay to the Plaintiff a sum of Rs.16,440/- with interest at the rate of 12 % per annum from the date of filing the suit till the date of Decree and 6 % per annum on the principal amount of Rs.10,000/- from the date of decree till the date of realization.

SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI [Prl.JCJ] 7 OS.No.128 of 2020

Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this the 6th day of

January, 2022.

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GADWAL.

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS

SL.

PARTICULARS FOR PLAINTIFF FOR DEFENDANT

NO.

1.Stamp on plaintRs. 1,176=00Exparte

2.Stamp on powerRs. 2=00--

3.Stamp on processRs. 80=00--

4.Stamp on documents----

5.Advocate’s FeeRs. 1451=00--

6.Miscellaneous ----

TOTAL Rs. 2,709=00--

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GADWAL.

SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI [Prl.JCJ]

OS/50/2021

K. Anjaneyulu vs Shaik Melekha begem

05 Aug 2022

1 OS.No.50 of 2021

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT GADWAL

Dated this the 05th day of August, 2022.

PRESENT:- SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI,

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GADWAL.

Original Suit No. 50 of 2021.

BETWEEN:- K.Anjaneyulu S/o Late K.Siddiramappa, age:79 Years, Occ:Legal Practitioner and Agriculture, R/o H.No.4-5-79/1, Rajaveedhi, Gadwal Town and Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District. … Plaintiff.

AND

Smt.Malekha Begum W/o Ahmed, aged about:45 Years, Occ:House wife, R/o H.No.8-1-105/6, Bijili Mohalla, Gadwal Town, Jogulamba Gadwal District.

… Defendant.

Claim:Suit for Recovery of Money of Rs.2,03,474/- based on mortgage deed under Order VII Rule 1 and 2 Read with Section 26 of C.P.C.

This suit is coming before me for final hearing on 22-07-2021 in the presence of Sri.G.Sudhakar, Counsel for the Plaintiff and the Defendant is set exparte, upon hearing the counsel for Plaintiff, perusal of the material on record, and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, the court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

This is a suit filed under Order VII Rule 1 and 2 Read with Section 26 of Code of Civil Procedure by the Plaintiff for recovery of amount of

Rs.2,03,474/- along with interest at 24 % per annum from the date of filing of the suit till realization and to grant any other appropriate reliefs in the interest of justice.

2. The brief averments of the Plaint are as follows:

2.1 The Plaintiff submitted that the families of the Plaintiff and

Defendant are well known to each other from several years and are having cordial relations between them. Based on the said acquaintance the

SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI [Prl.JCJ] 2 OS.No.50 of 2021

Defendant has requested the Plaintiff for hand loan amount of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) to meet his family necessities. On considering the request of the Defendant, the Plaintiff has given an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) to the Defendant on 11-08-2016. On the receipt of the said amount the Defendant has executed a registered simple mortgage deed vide Document No.7219/2016, dt:11-08-2016 for the purpose of collateral security to repay the loan amount in favour of the Plaintiff stating that, the Defendant is absolute owner and possessor over the house bearing

No.8-1-105/6 situated at Gadwal sivar and Mandal in the favour of the

Plaintiff on the same day stating that, the said loan amount shall be discharged with interest at Rs.2/- per month per hundred within (30) months of time i.e., from 11-08-2016 to 10-02-2019 and on the repayment of the said loan the said mortgage deed shall be cancelled.

2.2 The Plaintiff further submitted that after availing the loan amount the Defendant did not repay anything despite of repeated requests and demands made by the Plaintiff at several times. The Defendant simply postponed the matter with one or other pretext. The Plaintiff got issued legal notice to the Defendant on 22-10-2020 demanding to repay the loan amount

dated 11-08-2016 with its accrued interest. The legal notice was duly served

on the Defendant. But the Defendant did not repay anything despite of the said legal notice was duly served on her. The Defendant was in a mood to evade the loan amount. Hence the suit.

3. After numbering of the suit, summons were issued to Defendant.

After service of summons, the Defendant refused the summons and did not choose to appear before this court, hence he was set Ex-Parte.

4. On behalf of the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff himself got examined as PW-1 and got exhibited Exs.A1 to A4.

SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI [Prl.JCJ] 3 OS.No.50 of 2021

5. Heard the learned counsel for the Plaintiff and perused the record.

6. Now the point for consideration is “Whether this suit is entitled to be decreed as prayed for”?

7. P O I N T: The brief facts of the case are that the families of the

Plaintiff and Defendant are well known to each other from several years and are having cordial relations between them. Based on the said acquaintance the Defendant has requested the Plaintiff for hand loan amount of

Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) to meet his family necessities. On considering the request of the Defendant, the Plaintiff has given an amount of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lakh only) to the Defendant on 11-08-2016.

On the receipt of the said amount the Defendant has executed a registered simple mortgage deed vide Document No.7219/2016, dt:11-08-2016 for the purpose of collateral security to repay the loan amount in favour of the

Plaintiff stating that, the Defendant is absolute owner and possessor over the house bearing No.8-1-105/6 situated at Gadwal sivar and Mandal in the favour of the Plaintiff on the same day stating that, the said loan amount shall be discharged with interest at Rs.2/- per month per hundred within (30) months of time i.e., from 11-08-2016 to 10-02-2019 and on the repayment of the said loan the said mortgage deed shall be canceled. The

Plaintiff further submitted that after availing the loan amount the Defendant did not repay anything despite of repeated requests and demands made by the Plaintiff at several times. The Defendant simply postponed the matter with one or other pretext. The Plaintiff got issued legal notice to the

Defendant on 22-10-2020 demanding to repay the loan amount dated 11- 08-2016 with its accrued interest. The legal notice was duly served on the

Defendant. But the Defendant did not repay anything despite of the said legal notice was duly served on her. The Defendant was in a mood to evade

SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI [Prl.JCJ] 4 OS.No.50 of 2021 the loan amount. With the above pleadings the Plaintiff got examined himself as PW-1 and got exhibited A1 to A4. Ex.A1 is Registered Mortgage

Deed vide Document No.7219/2016, dt:11-08-2016, Ex.A2 is office copy of legal notice, dt:22-10-2020, Ex.A3 is postal receipt, dt:27-10-2020 and

Ex.A4 is Postal Acknowledgment card.

8. The Evidence of PW-1 and the contents of Ex.A1 to A4 are showing the burden on the shoulders of the Defendant, as the case of the

Plaintiff is establishing through his pleadings and Exhibits A1 to A4 that the

Defendant has borrowed Rs.1,00,000/- by executing Ex.A1. It is not the case of the Defendant here that she has no knowledge about the suit, since the summons to Defendant are successfully served on her. But till now the

Defendant has not taken any steps to come on record and contest the matter. It all showing that the Defendant is having knowledge about the institution of the suit. In the above circumstances the evidence of PW-1 and the contents of Exhibits A1 to A4 are remained unchallenged and unshaken and proved the case of the Plaintiff. Point is agreed accordingly.

9. In the Result, the suit is preliminarily decreed with costs, in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant by directing her to pay a sum of Rs.2,03,474/- to the Plaintiff. Further the Defendant is directed to pay interest amount at the rate of 12 % per annum from the date of filing the suit till the date of Decree and 6 % per annum from the date of decree till the date of realization on the principal amount of Rs.1,00,000/-. The time for redemption is granted for three months, failing which the Plaintiff is entitled to take appropriate steps for realization of the suit amount by putting the suit mortgaged property to sale according to law.

Typed to my dictation by Typist, corrected and pronounced by me in open court on this the 05th day of August, 2022.

SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI [Prl.JCJ] 5 OS.No.50 of 2021

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GADWAL.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESS EXAMINED

For Plaintiff: For Defendant: PW-1 : K.Anjaneyulu. - None-

EXHIBITS MARKED

For the Plaintiff:

Ex.A1:Registered Mortgage Deed vide Document No.7219/2016, dt:11- 08-2016,

Ex.A2:Office copy of legal notice, dt:22-10-2020

Ex.A3:Postal receipt, dt:27-10-2020

Ex.A4:Postal Acknowledgment card.

For the Defendant:

- Nil –

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

GADWAL.

SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI [Prl.JCJ] 6 OS.No.50 of 2021

DECREE

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT GADWAL

PRESENT:- SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI,

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GADWAL.

DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021.

Original Suit No. 124 OF 2021.

BETWEEN:- K.Brahmaiah Achari S/o K.Chinna Narsimhulu, age:39 Years, Occ:Agriculture and Carpenter, R/o Bijwaram Village, Maldakal Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District. … Plaintiff.

AND

M.Venkata Swamy S/o M.Thimmoji, age:50 Years, Occ:Business, R/o Pypadu Village and Post, Vaddepalli Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District. … Defendant.

SUIT CLAIM:- The suit is valued Rs.16,440/- basing on promissory note.

PLAINT PRESENTED ON:24-03-2021. PLAINT FILED ON:24-03-2021.

VALUATION: The suit claim is valued at Rs.16,440/- for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction and a court fee of Rs.1,176/- was paid under section 20 (C) of A.P.C.F and S.V.Act.

CAUSE OF ACTION: The cause of action for the suit arose on 15-06-2018 at Bijwaram Village, Maldakal Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District.

This suit coming before me for final hearing in the presence of

Sri.A.Rahamathulla Baig, counsel for Plaintiff and the Defendant was set exparte and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this court doth order and decree as follows:-

1.That the suit of the Plaintiff be and hereby is decreed without costs

and

SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI [Prl.JCJ] 7 OS.No.50 of 2021

Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this the 6th day of

January, 2022.

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GADWAL.

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS

SL.

PARTICULARS FOR PLAINTIFF FOR DEFENDANT

NO.

1.Stamp on plaintRs. 1,176=00Exparte

2.Stamp on powerRs. 2=00--

3.Stamp on processRs. 80=00--

4.Stamp on documents----

5.Advocate’s FeeRs. 1451=00--

6.Miscellaneous ----

TOTAL Rs. 2,709=00--

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GADWAL.

SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI [Prl.JCJ]

OS/339/2021

Gattu Narsimhulu vs Pedda Jayanna

20 Jul 2022

1 OS.No.339 of 2021

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT GADWAL.

Dated this the 20th day of July, 2022

PRESENT:- SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI,

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GADWAL.

Original Suit No. 339 of 2021.

BETWEEN:- Gattu Narsimhulu S/o Gattu Masanna, aged:39 Years, Occ: Agriculture and Mason, R/o Old Housing Board Colony, Gadwal Town, Jogulamba Gadwal District. … Plaintiff.

AND

Pedda Jayanna S/o Peddanna, age:47 Years, Occ:Agriculture and Business, R/o Rangapuram Village, Kalur Thimman Doddi Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District. … Defendant.

Claim:Suit for Recovery of Money of Rs.1,11,756/- under Order VII Rule 1 and 2 Read with Section 26 of C.P.C.

This suit is coming before me for final hearing on 20-07-2022 in the presence of Sri.G.Sudhakar,Counsel for the Plaintiff and the Defendant is set exparte, upon hearing the counsel for Plaintiff, perusal of the material on record, and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, the court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

This is a suit filed under Order VII Rule 1 and 2 read with section 26 of Code of Civil Procedure by the Plaintiff for recovery of amount of

Rs.1,11,756/- along with interest at the rate of Rs.2/- per month per hundred from the date of filing of the suit till realization and to grant any other appropriate reliefs in the interest of justice.

2. The brief averments of the Plaint are as follows:

2.1 The Plaintiff and Defendant are well known to each other and are having cordial relations between them from several years, on the said acquaintance the Defendant requested the Plaintiff for a loan amount of

Rs.65,000/-(Rupees Sixty Five Thousand only) to meet his family

SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI [Prl.JCJ] 2 OS.No.339 of 2021 necessities. On 09-10-2018 upon the request of the Defendant the Plaintiff has given an amount of Rs.65,000/-(Rupees Sixty Five Thousand only) to the Defendant. On the receipt of the said loan amount the Defendant got executed a promissory note in favour of the Plaintiff on the same day agreeing to repay the said loan amount with its accrued interest at Rs.2/- per month per hundred.

2.2 The Plaintiff further submitted that after availing the said loan amount the Defendant did not repay anything either interest or principal amount till date, despite of repeated requests and demands made by the

Plaintiff. The Defendant postponed the matter with one or other pretext by saying today and tomorrow. The Plaintiff got issued a legal notice to the

Defendant on 13-09-2021 through a registered post with acknowledgment due with a demand to discharge the loan amount with accrued interest thereon. The Defendant did not repay anything though the Plaintiff has waited for a considerable time and he is in a mood to evade the loan amount. Having no other alternative,the Plaintiff approached the court for the recovery of money against the Defendant. Hence the suit.

3. After numbering of the suit, summons were issued to Defendant.

After service of summons, the Defendant did not choose to appear before this court, hence he was set Exparte.

4. On behalf of the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff himself got examined as

PW1 and got exhibited Ex.A1 to Ex.A3.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the Plaintiff and perused the record.

6. Now the point for consideration is “Whether this suit is entitled to be decreed as prayed for”?

SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI [Prl.JCJ] 3 OS.No.339 of 2021

7. P O I N T: The brief facts of the case are that the Plaintiff and

Defendant are well known to each other and are having cordial relations between them from several years, on the said acquaintance the Defendant requested the Plaintiff for a loan amount of Rs.65,000/-(Rupees Sixty Five

Thousand only) to meet his family necessities. On 09-10-2018 upon the request of the Defendant the Plaintiff has given an amount of Rs.65,000/- (Rupees Sixty Five Thousand only) to the Defendant. On the receipt of the said loan amount the Defendant got executed a promissory note in favour of the Plaintiff on the same day agreeing to repay the said loan amount with its accrued interest at Rs.2/- per month per hundred. The Plaintiff further submitted that after availing the said loan amount the Defendant did not repay anything either interest or principal amount till date, despite of repeated requests and demands made by the Plaintiff. The Defendant postponed the matter with one or other pretext by saying today and tomorrow. The Plaintiff got issued a legal notice to the Defendant on 13-09- 2021 through a registered post with acknowledgment due with a demand to discharge the loan amount with accrued interest thereon. The Defendant did not repay anything though the Plaintiff has waited for a considerable time and he is in a mood to evade the loan amount. Having no other alternative,the Plaintiff approached the court for the recovery of money against the Defendant. With the above pleadings the Plaintiff got examined himself as PW1 and got exhibited Ex.A1 to Ex.A3. Ex.A1 is Original

Promissory note for Rs.65,000/, dt:09-10-2018 executed by the Defendant in favour of the Plaintiff, Ex.A2 is office copy of legal notice issued to

Defendant, dt:13-09-2021 and Ex.A3 is postal receipt, dt:15-09-2021.

8. The Evidence of PW-1 and the contents of Ex.A1 to Ex.A3 are showing the burden on the shoulders of the Defendant, as the case of the

Plaintiff is establishing through his pleadings and Exhibits A1 to A3 that the

SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI [Prl.JCJ] 4 OS.No.339 of 2021

Defendant has borrowed Rs.65,000/- by executing Ex.A1. It is not the case of the Defendant here that he has no knowledge about the suit, since the summons to Defendant are successfully served on him. But till now the

Defendant has not taken any steps to come on record and contest the matter. It all showing that the Defendant is having knowledge about the institution of the suit. In the above circumstances the evidence of PW-1 and the contents of Exhibits A1 to A3 are remained unchallenged and unshaken and proved the case of the Plaintiff. Point is agreed accordingly.

9. In the Result, the suit is decreed with costs, in favour of the

Plaintiff and against the Defendant by directing him to pay a sum of

Rs.1,11,756/- to the Plaintiff. Further the Defendant is directed to pay interest amount at the rate of 12 % per annum from the date of filing the suit till the date of Decree and 6 % per annum from the date of decree till the date of realization on the principal amount of Rs.65,000/-.

Typed to my dictation by Typist, corrected and pronounced by me in open court on this the 20th day of July, 2022.

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GADWAL.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESS EXAMINED

For Plaintiff: For Defendant: PW-1 : Gattu Narsimhulu - None-

EXHIBITS MARKED

For the Plaintiff:

Ex.A1:Original Promissory note for Rs.65,000/-, dt:09-10-2018.

Ex.A2 : Office copy of legal notice, dt:13-09-2021,

Ex.A3 : Postal receipt, dt:15-09-2021.

SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI [Prl.JCJ] 5 OS.No.339 of 2021

For the Defendant: - Nil –

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

GADWAL.

SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI [Prl.JCJ] 6 OS.No.339 of 2021

DECREE

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT GADWAL

PRESENT:- SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI,

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GADWAL.

DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021.

Original Suit No. 124 OF 2021.

BETWEEN:- K.Brahmaiah Achari S/o K.Chinna Narsimhulu, age:39 Years, Occ:Agriculture and Carpenter, R/o Bijwaram Village, Maldakal Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District. … Plaintiff.

AND

M.Venkata Swamy S/o M.Thimmoji, age:50 Years, Occ:Business, R/o Pypadu Village and Post, Vaddepalli Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District. … Defendant.

SUIT CLAIM:- The suit is valued Rs.16,440/- basing on promissory note.

PLAINT PRESENTED ON:24-03-2021. PLAINT FILED ON:24-03-2021.

VALUATION: The suit claim is valued at Rs.16,440/- for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction and a court fee of Rs.1,176/- was paid under section 20 (C) of A.P.C.F and S.V.Act.

CAUSE OF ACTION: The cause of action for the suit arose on 15-06-2018 at Bijwaram Village, Maldakal Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District.

This suit coming before me for final hearing in the presence of

Sri.A.Rahamathulla Baig, counsel for Plaintiff and the Defendant was set exparte and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this court doth order and decree as follows:-

1.That the suit of the Plaintiff be and hereby is decreed without costs

and

SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI [Prl.JCJ] 7 OS.No.339 of 2021

Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this the 6th day of

January, 2022.

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GADWAL.

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS

SL.

PARTICULARS FOR PLAINTIFF FOR DEFENDANT

NO.

1.Stamp on plaintRs. 1,176=00Exparte

2.Stamp on powerRs. 2=00--

3.Stamp on processRs. 80=00--

4.Stamp on documents----

5.Advocate’s FeeRs. 1451=00--

6.Miscellaneous ----

TOTAL Rs. 2,709=00--

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GADWAL.

SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI [Prl.JCJ]

OS/410/2021

Kurva Manemma vs Kurva Karreppa @ Karrenna

19 Jul 2022

1 O.S.No.410 of 2021

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT GADWAL.

DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JULY, 2022.

PRESENT:- Smt.Kavitha Karnati, Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Gadwal.

O.S.No. 410 of 2021.

BETWEEN: Kurva Manemma D/o Late Maldakantaiah, aged:35 Years, Occ:Agriculture, R/o H.No.4-16/2, Thumkunta Village of Ieeja Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District.

… Plaintiff.

And

Kurva Karreppa @Karrenna S/o Late Kurva Maldakantaiah, aged:40 Years, Occ:Agriculture, R/o Thumkunta Village of Ieeja Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District.

… Defendant.

Claim:Suit for grant of Perpetual Injunction over the suit schedule property under Order VII Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 26 of C.P.C.

This Original Suit coming before me for hearing on 19-07-2022 in the presence of Sri.K.Krishna Mohan Reddy, Counsel for the Plaintiff and Defendant was set exparte and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:

:: J U D G M E N T ::

This suit is filed by Plaintiff against the Defendant for grant of perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant, his men from interfering into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of Plaintiff over the suit schedule property house bearing

No.4-16/2 an extent of 40X33 feets situated at Thumkunta Village of Ieeja Mandal,

Jogulamba Gadwal District.

2. The averments of plaint in a nut shell are as beneath:- 2.1 The Plaintiff is the owner and possessor of the house bearing No.4- 16/2 an extent of 40X30 feets situated at Thumkunta Village of Ieeja Mandal,

Jogulamba Gadwal District. The said house was constructed by the Plaintiff in the year 2016 and the Plaintiff name was mutated in the Gram Panchayath records of

Thumkunta Village. The Plaintiff has been enjoying as owner and possessor of suit

Smt.Kavitha Karnati (Prl.JCJ) 2 O.S.No.410 of 2021 schedule property and has been regularly paying property tax to the Gram

Panchayath, Thumkunta Village.

2.2 The Plaintiff further submitted that the Defendant is having no right, title or concern over the suit schedule house No.4-16/2 and except the Plaintiff nobody has got any title and possession over the suit schedule property. The

Defendant having evil intention to grab the suit schedule house from the Plaintiff by hook or crook tried to enter into the suit schedule property on 29-10-2021 and again on 10-11-2021 damaged the house and tried to dispossess the Plaintiff from the suit schedule house and caused nuisance. The Plaintiff resisted the illegal acts of the Defendant and gave a complaint on 10-11-2021 against the Defendant

before Station House Officer, Ieeja but no action was taken against the Defendant.

Thus the Plaintiff, apprehending the danger of her dispossession from the suit schedule property approached this court. Hence the suit.

3. After numbering of the suit, summons were issued, after service of summons the Defendant did not choose to appear before this court, hence he was set Exparte.

4. The Plaintiff got examined as PW-1 and got marked Ex.A1 to A4. Ex.A1 is the ownership certificate, dt:05-10-2021, Ex.A2 is Property Tax Receipt for the year 2016-17, dt:02-04-2017, Ex.A3 is Property Tax Receipt for the year 2021-22, dt:26-10- 2021 and Ex.A4 is three Photos.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the Plaintiff and perused the record.

6. Now the point for consideration is

Whether the suit is entitled to be decreed as prayed for?

7. POINT :The sum and substance of the case of the Plaintiff from the Plaint

Averments, Chief Examination Affidavit of PW-1 and from the arguments of her counsel is that the Plaintiff is the owner and possessor of the house bearing No.4- 16/2 an extent of 40X30 feets situated at Thumkunta Village of Ieeja

Smt.Kavitha Karnati (Prl.JCJ) 3 O.S.No.410 of 2021

Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District. The said house was constructed by the

Plaintiff in the year 2016 and the Plaintiff name was mutated in the Gram

Panchayath records of Thumkunta Village. The Plaintiff has been enjoying as owner and possessor of suit schedule property and has been regularly paying property tax to the Gram Panchayath, Thumkunta Village. The

Plaintiff further submitted that the Defendant is having no right, title or concern over the suit schedule house No.4-16/2 and except the Plaintiff nobody has got any title and possession over the suit schedule property. The

Defendant having evil intention to grab the suit schedule house from the

Plaintiff by hook or crook tried to enter into the suit schedule property on 29-10-2021 and again on 10-11-2021 damaged the house and tried to dispossess the Plaintiff from the suit schedule house and caused nuisance.

The Plaintiff resisted the illegal acts of the Defendant and gave a complaint on 10-11-2021 against the Defendant before Station House Officer, Ieeja but no action was taken against the Defendant. Thus the Plaintiff, apprehending the danger of her dispossession from the suit schedule property approached this court.

8. As the Plaintiff knocked the doors of this court for the relief of Perpetual

Injunction, the legal burden of proving her lawful possession and enjoyment over the suit schedule property as on the date of filing of the suit, also the alleged interference and threatening of the Defendant with his men over the suit schedule property is on the shoulders of Plaintiff only. By relying on the oral and documentary evidence of the

Plaintiff without relying on the weakness in the case of the Defendant.

9. Now it would be seen how far the Plaintiff would prove her case by relying on her oral and documentary evidence.

Smt.Kavitha Karnati (Prl.JCJ) 4 O.S.No.410 of 2021

10. By referring the contents of Ex.A1 to Ex.A4, the Plaintiff tried to prove her case pleadings, her possession over the suit scheduled property. Without having any right, title over the suit schedule property, Defendant has been trying to interfere with her possession. At this stage the legal burden of disproving the case of the Plaintiff shifts to the shoulders of the Defendant. But the Defendant has not turned up towards this court till today though the summons were served on the

Defendant.

11. Therefore it can be presumed that the Defendant even after having knowledge about filing of the suit by the Plaintiff in respect of the suit schedule property he did not turn up and contest the suit. If he is really having any interest or title over the suit schedule property he ought to have been appeared before this court, even after declaring him as exparte by taking steps of setting aside the said exparte orders.

12. Therefore in the above circumstances the evidence of PW-1 and contents of Exhibits A-1 to A-4 are unshakened and proved the case of Plaintiff, that she is in legal possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property as on the date of filing of the suit, without having any right the Defendant and his men tried to interfere with the suit schedule property of the Plaintiff.

13. In the Result the suit is decreed with costs in favour of Plaintiff, against the Defendant and his men by granting perpetual injunction by directing the Defendant and his men not to interfere into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Plaintiff over the suit schedule property.

Typed to my dictation by Typist, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court, this the 19th day of July, 2022.

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GADWAL.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

Smt.Kavitha Karnati (Prl.JCJ) 5 O.S.No.410 of 2021

PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANT: PW-1: Kurva Manemma. - None-

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

PLAINTIFF: Ex.A1 is the ownership certificate, dt:05-10-2021, Ex.A2 is Property Tax Receipt for the year 2016-17, dt:02-04-2017, Ex.A3 is Property Tax Receipt for the year 2021-22, dt:26-10-2021, Ex.A4 is three Photos.

DEFENDANT: - Nil -

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GADWAL.

Smt.Kavitha Karnati (Prl.JCJ)

OS/4/2021

V.Maheswar Reddy vs Kurva Pedda Thimmappa

05 Aug 2022

Order Record 674 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OS/244/2021	Boya Sivamma and others vs Boya Hussain and others	18 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
OS/1/2017	B.Radhakumari vs Boya Hanumanthu	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/492/2022	The SHO Maldakal vs K Harikrishna	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/499/2022	The SHO Ieeja vs Ramakrishana	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/530/2022	The SHO Maldakal vs Anjanamma alias Boya Munemma	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/531/2022	The SHO Maldakal vs Sarvesh alias Chinnabavi Sarvesh	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/537/2022	The SHO Excise vs Rajappa Goud	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/539/2022	The SHO Ieeja vs HAriprasad Goud	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/541/2022	The SHO Ieeja vs Sudhakar Goud	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/542/2022	The SHO Iexcise vs NArsimlu Goud	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/543/2022	The SHO Iexcise vs Veeresh Goud	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/544/2022	The SHO Iexcise vs Veenarra Goud	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/545/2022	The SHO Iexcise vs Chandrashekar Goud	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/546/2022	The SHO Iexcise vs Mallikarjun Goud and other	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/547/2022	The SHO Iexcise vs E. Veeresh Goud	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/548/2022	The SHO Iexcise vs Naganna Goud	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/549/2022	The SHO Iexcise vs Veeranna Goud	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/550/2022	The SHO Iexcise vs Kurva Ramesh and other	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/551/2022	The SHO Iexcise vs JAyanna	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/552/2022	The SHO Iexcise vs Chinna Venkatramulu Goud	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/553/2022	The SHO Iexcise vs Chinna Ayyanna Goud	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/554/2022	The SHO Iexcise vs Buddanna	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/555/2022	The SHO Iexcise vs Ramesh Goud	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/556/2022	The SHO Iexcise vs Narsanna Goud	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/557/2022	The SHO Iexcise vs Venkatesh Goud	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/558/2022	The SHO Iexcise vs Eeranna Goud	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/559/2022	The SHO Iexcise vs NAllanna	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/560/2022	The SHO Excise Gadwal vs Mahabub sab and toher	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/561/2022	The SHO Excise Gadwal vs Sathanna	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/562/2022	The SHO Excise Gadwal vs Eeranna Goud	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/563/2022	The SHO Excise Gadwal vs Narsimlu	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/564/2022	The SHO Excise Gadwal vs NArsimlu Goud	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/565/2022	The SHO Excise Gadwal vs Naganna Goud	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/566/2022	The SHO Excise Gadwal vs S. Buchanna	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/568/2022	The SHO Excise Gadwal vs Pinjari Basha	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/569/2022	The SHO Excise Gadwal vs Boya Karrenna	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/570/2022	The SHO Excise Gadwal vs Mallesh	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/571/2022	The SHO Excise Gadwal vs Kurumurthy Goud	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/572/2022	The SHO Excise Gadwal vs Boya Bheemanna	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/573/2022	The SHO Excise Gadwal vs Mala Jambaiah	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/574/2022	The SHO Excise Gadwal vs Jakkula Hanmanthu	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/575/2022	The SHO Excise Gadwal vs Y. Maheshwari	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/576/2022	The SHO Excise Gadwal vs Y. Maheshwari	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/577/2022	The SHO Excise Gadwal vs Nalla Goud	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/578/2022	The SHO Excise Gadwal vs Chandraiah Goud	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/579/2022	The SHO Excise Gadwal vs G. Prakasham	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/580/2022	The SHO Excise Gadwal vs Kambaiah	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/581/2022	The SHO Ieeja vs Anil kumar setty	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/582/2022	The SHO Ieeja vs Nagaiah	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1415/2022	The SHO Aize vs H. Bhaskar	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1416/2022	The SHO Aize vs Vsgovinda Reddy	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1418/2022	The SHO Aize vs Govinda Reddy	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1419/2022	The SHO Aize vs Gopinath	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1420/2022	The SHO Aize vs Eedanna	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1421/2022	The SHO Aize vs MAjeed	13 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
OS/246/2021	Smt. Sulochanamma vs The Thasildar, Dharoor and other	11 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1365/2022	The SHO Ieeja vs Murali Mohan	11 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1366/2022	The SHO Ieeja vs Madhu yadav	11 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1367/2022	The SHO Ieeja vs M. Venkateshwarlu	11 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1368/2022	The SHO Ieeja vs Ravi Babu	11 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1369/2022	The SHO Ieeja vs Eerana Goud	11 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1370/2022	The SHO Ieeja vs B. Nagesh	11 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1371/2022	The SHO Ieeja vs P Anil	11 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
OS/130/2021	Ieeja Vijaya Laxmi vs Srinivas Chary and others	10 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/535/2022	The SHO Ieeja vs Keshavarapu Laxmi Krishna and others	10 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1289/2022	The SHO Maldakal vs Vinod Kumar	10 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1290/2022	The SHO Maldakal vs M. Anjaneyulu	10 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1291/2022	The SHO Maldakal vs Narshimudu	10 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1292/2022	The SHO Maldakal vs Thirumalesh Goud	10 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1293/2022	The SHO Ieeja vs Thimmappa	10 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1294/2022	The SHO Ieeja vs Basheer Ahmed	10 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/521/2019	The SHO Aize vs Pedda Anjaneyulu	08 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
CC/1358/2019	The SHO Aize vs Papanna and others	08 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1273/2022	The SHO Maldakal vs Kashapogu Prabhakar	08 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1274/2022	The SHO Maldakal vs MC Narsimlu	08 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1275/2022	The SHO Maldakal vs Chinna Thimmappa	08 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1276/2022	The SHO Maldakal vs Ramanjaneyulu	08 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1277/2022	The SHO Maldakal vs Chakali Keshavulu	08 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1260/2022	The SHO Aize vs Darenna	06 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1261/2022	State of Telangana vs Anil.B	06 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1262/2022	The SHO Aize vs Praveen kumar Goud	06 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1263/2022	The SHO Aize vs WAdde Raju	06 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1264/2022	The SHO Aize vs Shekar	06 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1265/2022	The SHO Aize vs Nazeer Ahmed	06 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1266/2022	The SHO Aize vs NAveen Kumar	06 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1267/2022	The SHO Aize vs Wadde Naresh	06 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1268/2022	The SHO Aize vs Kurva Ramakrishna	06 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1269/2022	The SHO Aize vs Jagganath	06 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1270/2022	The SHO Aize vs Nagaraju	06 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1271/2022	The SHO Aize vs Bheemanna	06 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1272/2022	sho IEJA vs Vsh Ramesh	06 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
OS/4/2021	V.Maheswar Reddy vs Kurva Pedda Thimmappa	05 Aug 2022	JUDGMENT	—
OS/50/2021	K. Anjaneyulu vs Shaik Melekha begem	05 Aug 2022	JUDGMENT	—
STC/1256/2022	The SHO Aize vs Raman Goud	05 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1257/2022	The SHO Aize vs Moinuddin Basha	05 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1258/2022	The SHO Aize vs Wadde Anjaneyulu	05 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
STC/1259/2022	The SHO Aize vs Raghavendra	05 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
OS/104/2020	Kammari Veeranna and another vs Pedda Veeramma	04 Aug 2022	ORDER	—
OS/128/2020	Rudragoud @ Radrappa Gouda vs Veeranna Goud	04 Aug 2022	JUDGMENT	—
CC/1221/2019	The SHO Aize vs Chakali Mareppa	04 Aug 2022	ORDER	—

Showing 100 of 674 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Aug 2022		101
Jul 2022		18
Jun 2022		122
May 2022		8
Apr 2022		17
Mar 2022		136
Feb 2022		188
Jan 2022		16
Dec 2021		36
Nov 2021		33

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Smt.Kavitha Karnati handled?

Smt.Kavitha Karnati has handled 675 court orders since 2021 at Jogulamba Gadwal, PDJ Court Complex. The average disposal rate is 67 orders per month.

What types of cases does Smt.Kavitha Karnati hear?

Based on available records, Smt.Kavitha Karnati primarily handles Criminal matters (Summary Trial Cases, Criminal Cases) and Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) at Jogulamba Gadwal, PDJ Court Complex.

Where is Smt.Kavitha Karnati currently posted?

Smt.Kavitha Karnati is posted as Prl. Junior Civil Judges Court, Gadwal at Jogulamba Gadwal, PDJ Court Complex, Jogulamba Gadwal, Telangana.

Are judgments by Smt.Kavitha Karnati available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Smt.Kavitha Karnati are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Smt.Kavitha Karnati dispose cases?

Smt.Kavitha Karnati disposes approximately 67 cases per month, based on 675 orders handled over their tenure at Jogulamba Gadwal, PDJ Court Complex.

Since when is Smt.Kavitha Karnati serving?

Smt.Kavitha Karnati has been serving at Jogulamba Gadwal, PDJ Court Complex since 2021.

Case Types

STC 75%

OS 16%

CC 9%

PRC 0%

EP 0%

Posting History

Oct 2021 — Aug 2022

Prl. Junior Civil Judges Court, Gadwal · 675 orders

Other Judges at this Court

S.ravi Kumar

Principal District and Sessions Judge Gadwal

12 orders

Vodela Srinivas

Fast Track Special Court for Rape and POCSO Act ca...

52 orders

Mr. Venkatesh Durva

Prl. Junior Civil Judges Court, Gadwal

0 orders

Sri. A.Nagaraju

Principal Senior Civil Judge cum Assistant Session...

0 orders

Smt.T Lakshmi

Additional Senior Civil Judge cum Additional Assis...

205 orders

← View all judges at Jogulamba Gadwal, PDJ Court Complex

Smt.Kavitha Karnati

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT GADWAL

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

Original Suit No. 128 of 2020.

AND

J U D G M E N T

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESS EXAMINED

For Plaintiff: For Defendant:

EXHIBITS MARKED

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

DECREE

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT GADWAL

PRESENT:- SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI,

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GADWAL.

Original Suit No. 124 OF 2021.

AND

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS

PARTICULARS FOR PLAINTIFF FOR DEFENDANT

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT GADWAL

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

Original Suit No. 50 of 2021.

AND

J U D G M E N T

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESS EXAMINED

EXHIBITS MARKED

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

DECREE

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT GADWAL

PRESENT:- SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI,

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GADWAL.

Original Suit No. 124 OF 2021.

AND

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS

PARTICULARS FOR PLAINTIFF FOR DEFENDANT

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT GADWAL.

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

Original Suit No. 339 of 2021.

AND

J U D G M E N T

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESS EXAMINED

EXHIBITS MARKED

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

DECREE

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT GADWAL

PRESENT:- SMT.KAVITHA KARNATI,

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GADWAL.

Original Suit No. 124 OF 2021.

AND

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS

PARTICULARS FOR PLAINTIFF FOR DEFENDANT

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT GADWAL.

:: J U D G M E N T ::

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

IN THE COURT OF

GADWAL ,MAHABOOBNAGAR

OS/4/2021

JUDGMENT

GADWAL ,MAHABOOBNAGAR

GADWAL ,MAHABOOBNAGAR