Smt.L.Sarada Reddy

1 Judgment in C.C.696/2021 of V AJFCM, Kakinada

IN THE COURT OF V ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS: KAKINADA.

PRESENT:- SMT.L.SARDA REDDY V ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS: KAKINADA

WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021

C.C.No.696/2021

BETWEEN: State: Sub-Inspector of Police, Indrapalem PS, Kakinada ….COMPLAINANT AND A N D

Pilla Yathimani, S/o.Appa Rao, aged 35 years, D.No.5-166 Kottha Harijanapeta, H/o.Chandurthi, Gollaprolu Mandal

E.G.Dt. ...ACCUSED

**** This case coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of learned A.P.P., for the Prosecution and accused the admitted the offence at the time of examination U/s.251 Cr.P..C, this Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

Accused present. Copies of documents relied upon by the prosecution has been supplied to him as required U/s.209 Cr.P.C.

The accused is examined u/sec.251 Cr.P.C and the substance of accusation U/s.337 and 338 IPC is read over and explained to him. After hearing the accusation, the accused pleaded guilty for the offence U/s.337 and 338 IPC.

The admission relied upon by the accused for the offence U/s.337 and 338 IPC seems to voluntary and this court is satisfied about the said fact. Accordingly, the accused is convicted for the offence U/s,338 IPC.

Accused is heard with regard to the quantum of sentence and he submitted that he is the sole bread winner to his family and requested the court to take lenient view. After considering the fact of the case and the submissions made by the accused this court is inclined to take lenient view.

In the result, the accused is found guilty for the offence punishable U/s.338 IPC and he is convicted for the same U/s.241 of Cr.P.C. The accused is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- in default of payment of fine to suffer imprisonment for a period of three months for the offence proved U/s.338 IPC.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 4th day of August 2021.

Sd/-L.Sarada Reddy

V ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

OF FIRST CLASS: KAKINADA.

2 Judgment in C.C.696/2021 of V AJFCM, Kakinada

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

DOCUMENTS MARKED

No oral or documentary evidence adduced on either side.

Sd/-L.Sarada Reddy

V A.J.F.C.M

1 Judgment in C.C.722/2021 of V AJFCM, Kakinada

IN THE COURT OF V ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS: KAKINADA.

PRESENT:- SMT.L.SARDA REDDY V ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS: KAKINADA

WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021

C.C.No.722/2021

BETWEEN: State: Sub-Inspector of Police, Indrapalem PS, Kakinada ….COMPLAINANT AND A N D

Devada Tirupathi Rao, S/o.Venki Naidu, aged 53 years C/Velama, D.No.11-167, Drivers colony, Turangi(v)

Kakinada Rural ...ACCUSED

**** This case coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of learned A.P.P., for the Prosecution and accused the admitted the offence at the time of examination U/s.251 Cr.P..C, this Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

Accused present. Copies of documents relied upon by the prosecution has been supplied to him as required U/s.209 Cr.P.C.

The accused is examined u/sec.251 Cr.P.C and the substance of accusation U/s.338 IPC is read over and explained to him. After hearing the accusation, the accused pleaded guilty for the offence U/s.338 IPC.

The admission relied upon by the accused for the offence U/s.338 IPC seems to voluntary and this court is satisfied about the said fact. Accordingly, the accused is convicted for the offence U/s,338 IPC.

Accused is heard with regard to the quantum of sentence and he submitted that he is the sole bread winner to his family and requested the court to take lenient view. After considering the fact of the case and the submissions made by the accused this court is inclined to take lenient view.

In the result, the accused is found guilty for the offence punishable U/s.338 IPC and he is convicted for the same U/s.241 of Cr.P.C. The accused is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- in default of payment of fine to suffer imprisonment for a period of three months for the offence proved U/s.338 IPC.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 4th day of August 2021.

Sd/-L.Sarada Reddy

V ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

OF FIRST CLASS: KAKINADA.

2 Judgment in C.C.722/2021 of V AJFCM, Kakinada

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

DOCUMENTS MARKED

No oral or documentary evidence adduced on either side.

Sd/-L.Sarada Reddy

V A.J.F.C.M

1 Judgment in C.C.811/2021 of V AJFCM, Kakinada

IN THE COURT OF V ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS: KAKINADA.

PRESENT:- SMT.L.SARDA REDDY V ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS: KAKINADA

WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021

C.C.No.811/2021/2021

BETWEEN: State: Sub-Inspector of Police, Indrapalem PS, Kakinada ….COMPLAINANT AND A N D

Marisetti Rambabu, S/o.Satyanarayana, aged 40 years, C/Kapu, D.No.2-194, Revenue colony, Cheediga (v)

Kakinada Rural Mandal. ...ACCUSED

**** This case coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of learned A.P.P., for the Prosecution and accused the admitted the offence at the time of examination U/s.251 Cr.P..C, this Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

Accused present. Copies of documents relied upon by the prosecution has been supplied to him as required U/s.209 Cr.P.C.

The accused is examined u/sec.251 Cr.P.C and the substance of accusation U/s.337 IPC is read over and explained to him. After hearing the accusation, the accused pleaded guilty for the offence U/s.337 IPC.

The admission relied upon by the accused for the offence U/s.337 IPC seems to voluntary and this court is satisfied about the said fact. Accordingly, the accused is convicted for the offence U/s,337 IPC.

Accused is heard with regard to the quantum of sentence and he submitted that he is the sole bread winner to his family and requested the court to take lenient view. After considering the fact of the case and the submissions made by the accused this court is inclined to take lenient view.

In the result, the accused is found guilty for the offence punishable U/s.337 IPC and he is convicted for the same U/s.241 of Cr.P.C. The accused is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.500/- in default of payment of fine to suffer imprisonment for a period of one month for the offence proved U/s.337 IPC.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 4th day of August 2021. L.Sarada Reddy

V ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

OF FIRST CLASS: KAKINADA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

DOCUMENTS MARKED

2 Judgment in C.C.811/2021 of V AJFCM, Kakinada

No oral or documentary evidence adduced on either side.

Sd/-L.Sarada Reddy

V A.J.F.C.M

IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDL., JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM- JUDICIAL

MAGISTATE OF FIRST CLASS: KAKINADA.

Present: Smt.L.Sarada Reddy, V Addl.Junior Civil Judge-Cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, FAC of II Addl.Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judl. Magistrate of First Class,Kakinada. Tuesday, the 27th day of July, 2021.

Original Suit No 552/2021

Between

Kadali Nageswara Rao, S/o Veerraju, Age 46 years, Employee, D.No.52-1-70/2, Palepumusalayya Street,Annammagati, Jagannadhapuram, Kakinada, (Kakinada Junior Civil Judge court Jurisdiction) ...Plaintif

AND

Kilaparthi Veera Venkata Appaji, S/o Late Someswar Rao, Age 42 years, D.No.235, Street No.800, Bank Colony, Peddapuram, East Godavari District,

(Kakinada Junior Civil Judge Court Jurisdiction)...Defendant

This suit is filed by the plaintif against the defendant to pass a decree in favour of the plaintif and against the defendant for the suit amount of Rs.12,19,200/- with subsequent interest at 24% p.a., from the date of suit till date of realization and to grant costs of the suit and such other reliefs.

This suit is coming on this day for summons in the presence of Sri.V.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for the plaintif and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:

O R D E R

I.A.256/2021 is allowed. Petition filed by the Plaintif to advance the suit to this day i.e., 27.7.2021 and the same is allowed. The Plaintif has filed

Full Satisfaction Memo along with the Petition and the same is recorded.

Parties are present before the court through virtual Mode. Hence the Full

Satisfaction Memo recorded. Suit is dismissed without costs.

Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 27th day of July,2021.

Sd/- L.Sarada Reddy,

V Addl.,Junior Civil Judge-cum- Judl.Magistrate of First Class,

(FAC) II AJCJ,

Kakinada.

No oral documentary evidence is not adduced on either side.

Sd/- L.Sarada Reddy,

V AJCJ-cum-JFCM,

(FAC) II AJCJ,

IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDL., JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

KAKINADA

Present:Sri.N.Ramesh,Prl.Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada

LOK ADALAT

Thursday, this the 5th day of August, 2021.

MC .No.86/2019

Between:

Kongara Shireesha,W/o Kongara Bhupathi Reddy, Age 18 years, D/o Konkipudi Srinivasu, C/o Dojuburra Rajubabu, D.No.3-10-26/2, Housewife,Ganta vari Veedhi, recherlapeta, Kakinada, Kakinada II Town P.S.Limits. …Petitioner

AND Kongara Bhupathi Reddy,S/o late China Kannayya, aged 33 years, Municipal elementary School, 2nd Grade Teacher,R/o D.No.70-14-8/37,

Jayendranagar, Kakinada, Kakinada III Town P.S.Limits....Respondent

This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the accused for the offence under Sec. 125 of Cr.PC to enquire into the matter and punish the accused according to law.

This Case is coming on this day before me in the presence of Sri K.SriHari, Advocate for Petitioner and Sri.M.K.Swamy, advocate for respondent matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this court made the following:

ORDER

Both the petitioner and respondent along with their counsels on record are present, whom have jointly filed terms of compromise, read over and explained to them in Telugu, admitted by them to be true and in token thereof they have subscribed their signatures here unto the award. Award passed(VSA). Strictly adhering to the terms of compromise. As a sequel petition is closed as withdrawn.

Sd/-Sri.N.Ramesh,

Presiding Officer, Prl.Junior Civil Judge,Kakinada.

on 26.3.2019.

It is further submitted that in view of Sec. 2(2)(b) CPC, there is no requirement to draft a decree as it shall not include any order of dismissal for default. Hence, the drafting of decree in this suit may be ordered to be dispensed with.

Submitted,

Typist.

Drafting of the Decree dispensed with

II Addl. Junior Civil Judge,