M Madhavi

Additional Junior Civil Judge

II Addl District Court Adoni · Kurnool · Andhra Pradesh

M Madhavi, Additional Junior Civil Judge, is posted at II Addl District Court Adoni, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India. 1,084 court orders on record since 2018. 14 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CC, OS, PRC cases.

1,084

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

OS/31/2017

P.Prameela. vs K.Ranganna.

11 Oct 2018

O.S. NO. 31/2017

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

PRESENT : Smt.M.MADHAVI,

II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ADONI

F.A.C.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

THURSDAY, THIS THE 11 th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2018.

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.31/2017

P.Prameela … Plaintiff

and

K. Ranganna … Defendant.

The suit is filed to recover an amount of Rs.2,20,540/ from the defendant on the foot of three pronotes and for costs of the suit, with the following averments that on 2032014, 2532014 and 362015, defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.50,000/, Rs.30,000/ and Rs.60,000/ respectively in cash from the plaintiff for his family necessities, agreeing to repay the same on demand with interest at 24% per annum and executed promissory notes A to C respectively in favour of the plaintiff. Inspite of oral demands by the plaintiff, the defendant did not choose to repay the borrowed amount with interest. Hence, the suit.

This suit is coming before me on 11102018 for final hearing in the presence of Sri V.Eranna, Advocate for the plaintiff and Sri H.Mahesh,Advocate for defendant and the counsel for plaintiff filed Full satisfaction Memo, this

Court delivered the following :

::JUDGMENT ::

The Counsel for the plaintiff filed Fullsatisfaction Memo and the same is recorded. Hence, the suit is dismissed without costs.

Pronounced by me in the Open Court, this the 11th day of October, 2018.

II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ADONI.

F.A.C.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

Page 1

O.S. NO. 31/2017

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

NONE

EXJHIBITS MARKED

NIL

II AJCJ,ADONI.

F.A.C.JCJ,PKD.

Page 2

O.S. NO. 31/2017

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

PRESENT : Smt.M.MADHAVI,

II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ADONI

F.A.C.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

THURSDAY, THIS THE 11 th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2018.

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.31/2017

P.Prameela W/o Late P.narayana, Hindu, aged about 48 years, Hindu, Pensioner, r/o D.No.1717959B, Near State Bank of India, Pattikonda village and Mandal, Kurnool District.… Plaintiff

and

K. Ranganna S/o K. Anjinaiah, aged about 59 years, Hindu, employee, working as Head Master,M.P.P.School, Edduladoddi village of Tuggali Mandal, and resident of H.No.11/2, Gooty Road, Pattikonda village and Mandal, Kurnool District. … Defendant.

Plaint presented on 2022017 and filed on 2032017. J.V. of Rs.2,20,540/ (Rs.85,000/ + Rs.50,860/ +Rs.84,680/ and Court Fee of Rs.8,678/ (Rs.3,100 + Rs.2,466/ + Rs.3,100/) is paid under Section 20 of APCF and SV Act.

Cause of action for the suit arose on 2032014, 2532014 and 362015, at Pattikonda village, when the defendant executed pronotes in favour of plaintiff and on dates of oral demands to defendant demanding to repay the promissory note debt, within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court.

Page 3

O.S. NO. 31/2017

i) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as full satisfaction recorded; ii) that each party do bear their own costs;

Given under my hand and seal of this Court, this the 11th day of October, 2018.

II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ADONI.

F.A.C.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

MEMO OF COSTS

FOR PLAINTIFFFOR DEFENDANT

NOT CERTIFIED

II AJCJ,ADONI.

F.A.C.JCJ,PKD.

Page 4

O.S. NO. 31/2017

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

PRESENT : Smt.M.MADHAVI,

II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ADONI

F.A.C.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

THURSDAY, THIS THE 6 th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2018.

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.163/2015

Smt.Vadde Sanjamma… Plaintiff

and

T.Mohammad and 3 others.… Defendants.

This is a suit for directing the defendants to vacate and hand over the vacant possession of the schedule mentioned shops to the plaintiff and if they failed to do so, the same may be ordered through process of Court and also to pass decree in favour of plaintiff as against defendants for payment of Rs.18,000/, Rs.9,000/, Rs.10,800/, Rs.9,000/ respectively, for payment of contract rent from the date of suit till the date of delivery of schedule mentioned shops and costs of the suit.

This suit is coming before me on 912018 for final hearing in the presence of Sri P.Yella Reddy, Advocate for the plaintiff and Sri K. Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the defendants and the plaintiff called absent and his counsel reported that plaintiff is not in contact with him and she may be called in person and plaintiff called absent, this Court delivered the following :

:: JUDGMENT ::

Plaintiff is called absent. The Counsel for the plaintiff reported that the plaintiff is not in contact with him and she may be called in person. The plaintiff is called absent. Hence, the suit is dismissed.

Page 5

O.S. NO. 31/2017

Pronounced by me in the Open Court, this the 6th day of September, 2018.

II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ADONI.

F.A.C.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

NONE

EXHIBITS MARKED

NIL

II AJCJ,ADONI.

F.A.C.JCJ,PKD.

Page 6

O.S. NO. 31/2017

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

PRESENT : SRI MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL, JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

TUESDAY, THIS THE 9 th DAY OF JANUARY, 2018.

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.107/2010

Between:

Padmasale Narasimhudu S/O Padmasale Ramanna, 50 years, Hindu, Agriculturist, r/o Pandikona village in Pattikonda Mandal,Kurnool District.… Plaintiff

and

Basimi Ramanjaneyulu S/o Basimi Anjinaiah,aged 52 years,Hindu, agriculturist, r/o Pulikonda village, Pulikonda Mandal, Kurnool District. … Defendant.

This is a suit for specific performance of agreement of sale executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff on 1252004 directing him to execute registered sale deed in favour of plaintiff at his costs and in case he failed to do so, the same may be done through process of Court and also for consequential decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendant, his men, servants and relatives from interfering and dispossessing the plaintiff over the plaint schedule property and costs of the suit.

Plaint presented on 1572010 and filed on 1572010. JV of Rs.45,000/ + Rs.5,000/ and CF of Rs.2,266/ + Rs.411/ is paid thereon U/S 39 Art.1 Sch.1 and U/S 26 (c) of APCF and SV Act,1956 respectively.

Page 7

O.S. NO. 31/2017

This suit is coming before me on 912018 for final hearing in the presence of Sri B.Kullayappa and M.Chandrasekhar Naidu, Advocates for the plaintiff and Sri K. Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the defendant and the plaintiff failed to continue trial inspite of conditional order and in view dismissal of petition filed by him for grant of 30 days time, this Court doth order and decree as follows :

i) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default; ii) that there be no order as to costs;

Given under my hand and seal of this Court, this the 9th day of January, , 2018.

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

SCHEDULE

Land is situated in the Registration District of Kurnool and Sub Registration District of Pattikonda, in Pandikona village, Pattikonda Mandal within the jurisdiction of this Court, with the following particulars:

Survey No. Extent Ac. 292Ac.4.00

Boundaries : East :Land of Padmasale Leelavathamma West : Pulikonda rastha and land of Veerabhadri. North: Land of Rangappa Raju South: Land of Uppara Rangaswamy.

MEMO OF COSTS

FOR PLAINTIFF FOR DEFENDANT

Not Certified Not certified

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

Page 8

O.S. NO. 31/2017

PATTIKONDA.

Page 9

OS/70/2018

Ambati Raja Readdy vs E.V.M.Raju

11 Oct 2018

O.S. NO. 70/2018

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

PRESENT : Smt.M.MADHAVI,

II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ADONI

F.A.C.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

THURSDAY, THIS THE 11 th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2018.

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.70/2018

Ambati Raja Reddy… Plaintiff

and

E.V.M.Raju… Defendant.

The suit is filed to recover an amount of Rs.1,28,800/ from the defendant on the foot of a pronote and for costs of the suit, with the following averments that on 2822015, defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.75,000/ in cash from the plaintiff for his family necessities, agreeing to repay the same on demand with interest at 24% per annum and executed promissory note in favour of the plaintiff. Inspite of oral demands by the plaintiff, the defendant did not choose to repay the borrowed amount with interest. Hence, the suit.

This suit is coming before me on 11102018 for final hearing in the presence of Sri K.Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the plaintiff and summons to defendant pending and plaintiff failed to pay batta and there is no representation on behalf of plaintiff, this Court delivered the following :

::JUDGMENT ::

Batta not paid. No representation from plaintiff. Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Pronounced by me in the Open Court, this the 11th day of October, 2018.

II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ADONI.

F.A.C.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

NONE

EXJHIBITS MARKED

NIL

II AJCJ,ADONI.

F.A.C.JCJ,PKD.

Page 1

O.S. NO. 70/2018

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

PRESENT : Smt.M.MADHAVI,

II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ADONI

F.A.C.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

THURSDAY, THIS THE 11 th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2018.

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.70/2018

Ambati Raja Reddy S/o A. Diva Reddy, aged about 44 years, Hindu, ryot and business, r/o H.No.1718816, Pattikonda village and Mandal, Kurnool District. … Plaintiff

and

E.V.M.Raju S/o Y.E.David, aged about 40 years, Hindu, employee working as RTC Conductor, Pattikonda Depot and residing in H.NO.1718016, Pattikonda village and Mandal, Kurnool District.… Defendant.

Plaint presented on 2622018 and filed on 1362018 J.V. of

Rs.1,28,800/ and Court Fee of Rs.3,726/ is paid under Section 20 of APCF and

SV Act.

Cause of action for the suit arose on 2822015, at Pattikonda village, when the defendant executed pronotes in favour of plaintiff and on dates of oral demands to defendant demanding to repay the promissory note debt, within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court.

This suit is coming before me on 11102018 for final hearing in the presence of Sri K.Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the plaintiff and summons to

Page 2

O.S. NO. 70/2018

defendant pending and plaintiff failed to pay batta and there is no representation on behalf of plaintiff, this Court doth order and decree as follows :

i) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default; ii) that there be no order as to costs;

Given under my hand and seal of this Court, this the 11th day of October, 2018.

II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ADONI.

F.A.C.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

MEMO OF COSTS

FOR PLAINTIFFFOR DEFENDANT

NOT CERTIFIED

II AJCJ,ADONI.

F.A.C.JCJ,PKD.

Page 3

O.S. NO. 70/2018

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

PRESENT : Smt.M.MADHAVI,

II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ADONI

F.A.C.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

THURSDAY, THIS THE 6 th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2018.

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.163/2015

Smt.Vadde Sanjamma… Plaintiff

and

T.Mohammad and 3 others.… Defendants.

:: JUDGMENT ::

Page 4

O.S. NO. 70/2018

Pronounced by me in the Open Court, this the 6th day of September, 2018.

II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ADONI.

F.A.C.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

NONE

EXHIBITS MARKED

NIL

II AJCJ,ADONI.

F.A.C.JCJ,PKD.

Page 5

O.S. NO. 70/2018

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

PRESENT : SRI MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL, JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

TUESDAY, THIS THE 9 th DAY OF JANUARY, 2018.

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.107/2010

Between:

Padmasale Narasimhudu S/O Padmasale Ramanna, 50 years, Hindu, Agriculturist, r/o Pandikona village in Pattikonda Mandal,Kurnool District.… Plaintiff

and

Basimi Ramanjaneyulu S/o Basimi Anjinaiah,aged 52 years,Hindu, agriculturist, r/o Pulikonda village, Pulikonda Mandal, Kurnool District. … Defendant.

Plaint presented on 1572010 and filed on 1572010. JV of Rs.45,000/ + Rs.5,000/ and CF of Rs.2,266/ + Rs.411/ is paid thereon U/S 39 Art.1 Sch.1 and U/S 26 (c) of APCF and SV Act,1956 respectively.

Page 6

O.S. NO. 70/2018

continue trial inspite of conditional order and in view dismissal of petition filed by him for grant of 30 days time, this Court doth order and decree as follows :

i) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default; ii) that there be no order as to costs;

Given under my hand and seal of this Court, this the 9th day of January, , 2018.

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

SCHEDULE

Survey No. Extent Ac. 292Ac.4.00

Boundaries : East :Land of Padmasale Leelavathamma West : Pulikonda rastha and land of Veerabhadri. North: Land of Rangappa Raju South: Land of Uppara Rangaswamy.

MEMO OF COSTS

FOR PLAINTIFF FOR DEFENDANT

Not Certified Not certified

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

Page 7

O.S. NO. 70/2018

Page 8

OS/65/2019

UPPARA CHENNAPPA vs CHAKALA NARAYANA

13 Mar 2020

OS No.65-2019 -1- JCJ Court,Pkd

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA

Present:- Smt. M.Madhavi, II Addl.Junior Civil Judge, Adoni FAC. Junior Civil Judge, Pattikonda

Friday, the 13th day of March, 2020

O.S.No.65 of 2019

Uppara Chennappa, aged 85 years, S/o Late Hanumanthu, Hindu, Pensioner, Near Siddanna Matam,

R/o Maddikera (V) & (M), Kurnool District.......... Plaintiff

And

Chakala Narayana, S/o Late C.Basappa, Aged 52 years, Hindu, Agriculturist and Business, Backside of police station, R/o.Maddikera (V) & (M),

Kurnool District........... Defendant

This suit is coming on 13-03-2020 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri A.Satyanarayana, Advocate for the plaintiff and the defendant remained exparte and having stood over for consideration till this day, this

Court delivered the following:

:: JUDGMENT ::

This suit is filed for recovery of sum of Rs.1,27,929/- (Rs.69,696/- +

Rs.58,233/-) basing on the foot of two promissory notes, dt.22-07-2017 for

Rs.50,000/- and on 05-07-2018 for Rs.50,000/-, in total Rs.1,00,000/-.

2. The brief averments of the plaint are as follows:

The plaintiff submits that on 22-07-2017 the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.50,000/- in cash from the plaintiff for his family expenses and agreeing to repay the same with interest @ 24% p.a. and executed promissory note in favour of the plaintiff. Again on 05-07-2018 the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.50,000/- in cash from the plaintiff for his family expenses and agreeing to repay the same with interest @ 24% p.a. and executed promissory note in favour of the plaintiff. He submitted that in spite of repeated oral demands and issuance of legal notices, dated

OS No.65-2019 -2- JCJ Court,Pkd

29.12.2018, the defendant has not chosen to pay the suit amount under two suit promissory notes. Hence, the suit.

3. The defendant was ex parte.

4. In order to prove the claim, the plaintiff examined himself as

P.W.1 and got marked Ex.A.1 to A.5.

5. Heard the plaintiff counsel.

6. Now the point for determination is that “Whether the

plaintiff is entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendant as

prayed for”?

POINT:

7.P.W.1 in his chief affidavit reiterated the contents of his plaint and got marked Ex.A.1 to A.5. Since, the defendant remained exparte, the evidence of P.W.1 remained unchallenged.

8. On a careful perusal of the unchallenged evidence of P.W.1 coupled with Ex.A.1 to A.5 this court is of the view that the plaintiff has established that on 22-07-2017 and on 05-07-2018 the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- in cash from him under two promissory notes for

Rs.50,000/- each. Ex.A.1 is original pronote “A”, dt. 22-07-2017 executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff for Rs.50,000/-. Ex.A.2 is original pronote “B”, dt. 05-07-2018 executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff for Rs.50,000/-. Ex.A.3 is office copy of legal notice, dt.29-12-2018. Ex.A.4 is postal receipt dated 29.12.2018. Ex.A.5 is postal acknowledgement card,

dated 02-01-2019.

OS No.65-2019 -3- JCJ Court,Pkd

9.In view of the above documents, this court is of the view that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendant as prayed for. Accordingly, the point is answered in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.

10.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs, directing the defendant to pay a sum of Rs.1,27,929/- (Rs.69,696/- + Rs.58,233/-) to the plaintiff with subsequent interest at the rate of 12% p.a. from the date of institution of the suit till the date of decree and with future interest at 6% p.a. from the date of decree till realization on principal sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs.50,000/- + Rs.50,000/-).

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court, this the 13th day of March, 2020.

II Addl.Junior Civil Judge, Adoni FAC. Junior Civil Judge, Pattikonda

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT:

P.W.1: Uppara Chennappa -None-

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT:

Ex.A.1: Original pronote “A”, dt. 22-07-2017 -Nil- executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff for Rs.50,000/-

Ex.A.2: Original pronote “B”, dt.05-07-2018 executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff for Rs.50,000/-

Ex.A.3: Office copy of legal notice, dt.29-12-2018 Ex.A.4: Postal receipt dated 29-12-2018 Ex.A.5: Postal acknowledgement card, dated 02-01-2019

II Addl.Junior Civil Judge, Adoni FAC. Junior Civil Judge, Pattikonda

OS No.65-2019 -4- JCJ Court,Pkd

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA

Present:- Smt. M.Madhavi, II Addl.Junior Civil Judge, Adoni FAC. Junior Civil Judge, Pattikonda

Friday, the 13th day of March, 2020

O.S.No.65 of 2019

Uppara Chennappa, aged 85 years, S/o Late Hanumanthu, Hindu, Pensioner, Near Siddanna Matam,

R/o Maddikera (V) & (M), Kurnool District....... Plaintiff

And

Chakala Narayana, S/o Late C.Basappa, Aged 52 years, Hindu, Agriculturist and Business, Backside of police station, R/o.Maddikera (V) & (M),

Kurnool District........ Defendant

This is a suit filed for recovery of Rs.1,27,929/- (Rs.69,696/- +

Rs.58,233/-) being the principal and interest due on a two promissory notes, dt.22-07-2017 for Rs.50,000/- and on 05-07-2018 for Rs.50,000/-, executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff agreeing to repay the said amount with interest @ 24% p.a., and for costs.

Plaint presented on 12.03.2019 and filed on 26.03.2019. J.V of Rs.

Rs.1,27,929/- (Rs.69,696/- + Rs.58,233/-) and C.F of Rs.5,412/- (Rs.2,786/- +Rs.2,626/-) is paid under Sec.20 of A.P.C.F and S.V.Act.

Cause of action arose on 22.07.2017 and 05.07.2018, when the suit promissory notes “A” and “B” are executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff, and on all dates of demands made by the plaintiff to the defendant to discharge the suit promissory notes at Maddikera village and mandal, which is within the jurisdiction of this Court.

This suit is coming before me on this day for disposal in the presence of Sri A.Satyanarayana, Advocate for the plaintiff and defendant remained ex parte, and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court doth decree:

1. that the defendant do pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.

Rs.1,27,929/- (Rs.69,696/- + Rs.58,233/-) together with

OS No.65-2019 -5- JCJ Court,Pkd

interest at 12% p.a on a principal sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs.50,000/- + Rs.50,000/-) from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter at 6% p.a till realization; and

2. that the defendant do also pay to the plaintiff a sum of

Rs.8,308/- towards the costs of the suit.

Given under my hand and seal of the court, this the 13th day of March, 2020.

II Addl.Junior Civil Judge, Adoni, FAC Junior Civil Judge, Pattikonda.

Memo of Costs

For PlaintiffFor Defendant

Stamp on VakalatRs. 2=00

Stamp on PlaintRs.5412=00- Nil -

Stamp on processRs. 75=00

Advocate feeRs.2769=00

Typing chargesRs. 50=00 -------------------

Total :Rs.8308=00 -------------------

II Addl.Junior Civil Judge, Adoni, FAC Junior Civil Judge, Pattikonda.

OS/204/2017

PRONOTE - Nese Muthyalaiah. vs M.Siddeswari.

16 Jun 2020

OS No.204-2017 -1- JCJ Court,Pkd

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA

Present:- Smt. M.Madhavi, II Addl.Junior Civil Judge, Adoni FAC. Junior Civil Judge, Pattikonda

Tuesday, the 16th day of June, 2020

O.S.No.204 of 2017

Nesu Muthyalaiah, aged 60 years,

S/o Anjinaiah, Hindu, Agriculturist,

R/o Thuggali (V) & (M), Kurnool District.......... Plaintiff

And

M.Siddeswari, D/o Paidi Reddeppa,

W/o.M.Ravi Prasad, Aged 50 years, Hindu, Business,

R/o.Sanipaya Village, Veeraballi Mandal,

Kadapa District. Now residing at C/o.M.Ravi Prasad,

B.L.No.38/2, R.P.F/L.P.I.No.331,

Lingampalli Railway station, Hyderabad,

Telangana State........... Defendant

This suit is coming on 16-06-2020 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri B.Lakshmi Narayana and Sri H.Mahesh, Advocates for the plaintiff and the defendant remained exparte and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

:: JUDGMENT ::

This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery of

Rs.1,77,132/- (Rs.88,566/- + Rs.88,566/-) being the principal and interest due under ‘A’ and ‘B’ promissory notes dated: 18-09-2014 and 18-09-2014 respectively, executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff for Rs.50,000/- and 50,000/- agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a.

2. The brief averments of the plaint are as follows:

On 18-09-2014 and 18-09-2014, the defendant borrowed a sum of

Rs.50,000/- and Rs.50,000/- from the plaintiff and towards her family necessities and business and became indebted to the plaintiff, the defendant

OS No.204-2017 -2- JCJ Court,Pkd

got executed demand two promissory notes in favour of plaintiff agreeing to repay the same on demand with interest at the rate of 24% p.a. Inspite of several demands made by the plaintiff, the defendant failed to discharge the debt due under the suit promissory note with interest. Hence, the plaintiff is constrained to file the present seeking recovery of suit debt.

3. The defendant was ex parte.

4. In order to prove the claim, the plaintiff examined himself as

P.W.1 and got marked Exs.A.1 and A.2.

5. Heard the plaintiff counsel.

6. Now the point for determination is that “Whether the

plaintiff is entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendant as

prayed for”?

POINT:

7.P.W.1 in his chief affidavit reiterated the contents of his plaint and got marked Exs.A.1 and A.2. Since, the defendant remained exparte, the evidence of P.W.1 remained unchallenged.

8. On a careful perusal of the unchallenged evidence of P.W.1 coupled with Exs.A.1 and A.2 this court is of the view that the plaintiff has established that on 18-09-2014 the defendant borrowed an amount of

Rs.1,00,000/- in cash from her under two promissory notes for Rs.50,000/- each. Ex.A.1 is original pronote “A”, dated:18-09-2014 executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff for Rs.50,000/-. Ex.A.2 is original pronote

OS No.204-2017 -3- JCJ Court,Pkd

“B”, dated:18-09-2014 executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff for

Rs.50,000/-.

10.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs, directing the defendant to pay a sum of Rs.1,77,132/- (Rs.88,566/- + Rs.88,566/-) to the plaintiff with subsequent interest at the rate of 12% p.a. from the date of institution of the suit till the date of decree and with future interest at 6% p.a. from the date of decree till realization on principal sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs.50,000/- + Rs.50,000/-).

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court, this the 16th day of June, 2020.

II Addl.Junior Civil Judge, Adoni FAC. Junior Civil Judge, Pattikonda

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT:

P.W.1: Nese Muthyalaiah -None-

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT:

Ex.A.1: Original pronote “A”, dt. 18-09-2014 -Nil- executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff for Rs.50,000/-

Ex.A.2: Original pronote “B”, dt.18-09-2014 executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff for Rs.50,000/-

II Addl.Junior Civil Judge, Adoni FAC. Junior Civil Judge, Pattikonda

OS No.204-2017 -4- JCJ Court,Pkd

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA

Present:- Smt. M.Madhavi, II Addl.Junior Civil Judge, Adoni FAC. Junior Civil Judge, Pattikonda

Tuesday, the 16th day of June, 2020

O.S.No.204 of 2017

Nesu Muthyalaiah, aged 60 years,

S/o Anjinaiah, Hindu, Agriculturist,

R/o Thuggali (V) & (M), Kurnool District.......... Plaintiff

And

M.Siddeswari, D/o Paidi Reddeppa,

W/o.M.Ravi Prasad, Aged 50 years, Hindu, Business,

R/o.Sanipaya Village, Veeraballi Mandal,

Kadapa District. Now residing at C/o.M.Ravi Prasad,

B.L.No.38/2, R.P.F/L.P.I.No.331,

Lingampalli Railway station, Hyderabad,

Telangana State........... Defendant

This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery of

Rs.1,77,132/- (Rs.88,566/- + Rs.88,566/-) being the principal and interest due under ‘A’ and ‘B’ promissory noteus dated: 18-09-2014 and 18-09-2014 respectively, executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff for Rs.50,000/- and 50,000/- agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and for costs.

Plaint presented on 05.09.2017 and filed on 31.10.2017. J.V of Rs.

Rs.1,77,132/- (Rs.88,566/- + Rs.88,566/-) and C.F of Rs.6,372/-(Rs.3,186/- +Rs.3,186/-) is paid under Sec.20 of A.P.C.F and S.V.Act.

Cause of action arose on 18.09.2014 when the suit promissory notes “A” and “B” are executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff, and on all dates of demands made by the plaintiff to the defendant to discharge the suit promissory notes at Tuggali village and mandal, which is within the jurisdiction of this Court.

This suit is coming before me on this day for disposal in the presence of Sri Sri B.Lakshmi Narayana and Sri H.Mahesh, Advocates for the plaintiff

OS No.204-2017 -5- JCJ Court,Pkd

and defendant remained ex-parte, and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court doth decree:

1. that the defendant do pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.

Rs.1,77,132/- (Rs.88,566/- + Rs.88,566/-) together with interest at 12% p.a on a principal sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs.50,000/- + Rs.50,000/-) from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter at 6% p.a till realization; and

2. that the defendant do also pay to the plaintiff a sum of

Rs.12,331/- towards the costs of the suit.

Given under my hand and seal of the court, this the 16th day of June, 2020.

II Addl.Junior Civil Judge, Adoni, FAC Junior Civil Judge, Pattikonda.

Memo of Costs

For PlaintiffFor Defendant

Stamp on VakalatRs. 2=00

Stamp on PlaintRs.6372=00

Stamp on processRs. 231=00

Advocate fee Sr.Rs.3507=00Exparte

Advocate fee Jr.Rs.1169=00

Typing chargesRs. 50=00

Publication chargesRs.1000=00

Total :Rs.12331=00

II Addl.Junior Civil Judge, Adoni, FAC Junior Civil Judge, Pattikonda.

OS/94/2018

K. CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY vs SUGALI BALI REDDY NAIK

09 Oct 2018

1 O.S. NO. 94/2018

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

PRESENT : Smt.M.MADHAVI,

II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ADONI

F.A.C.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

TUESDAY, THIS THE 9 th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2018.

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.94/2018

Between:

K.Chandrasekhar Reddy S/o K. Govind Reddy, aged about 62 years,

Agriculturist, r/o Puchakayalamada village, Pattikonda Mandal,

Kurnool District.… Plaintiff

and

Sugali Bali Reddy Naik S/o Sugali Banavath Seve Naik, aged about 45

years, business and agriculturist, r/o Japla Thanda village of Tuggali

Mandal, Kurnool District....Defendant.

The suit is filed against the defendant for the recovery an amount of Rs.25,670/ on the foot of promissory note and for costs of the suit,with the following averments that on 2652015, defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.15,000/ in cash from the plaintiff for his family necessities, agreeing to repay the same on demand with interest at 24% per annum and executed promissory note in favour of the plaintiff. Inspite of oral demands and by issuing legal notice

dated 1842018 by the plaintiff, the defendant did not choose to repay the

borrowed amount with interest. Hence, the suit.

Plaint presented on 952018 and filed on 1962018. J.V. of Rs.25,670/ and Court Fee of Rs.1,626/ is paid under Section 20 of APCF and SV Act.

Cause of action for the suit arose on 2652015 at Puchakayalamada village of Pattikonda Mandal, when defendant borrowed amount and executed pronote in favour of plaintiff, and on dates of oral demands and on 1842018, when plaintiff got issued legal notice to defendant demanding to repay the promissory note debt, within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court.

This suit is coming before me on 2792018 for final hearing in the presence of Sri P.Gopal Reddy and K.Sreekanth Reddy, Advocates for the plaintiff and defendant called absent and set exparte and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court doth order and decree as follows :

i)that the suit be and the same is hereby decreed in favour of plaintiff against defendant for a sum of Rs.25,670/ (Rupees Twenty five thousands six hundred

Page 1 2 O.S. NO. 94/2018 and seventy Only), with subsequent interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the filing the suit i.e., 952018 till the date of decree and at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the decree till realization on principal amount of Rs.15,000/; and ii) that the defendant do also pay a sum of Rs.2,739/ to the plaintiff being the costs of the suit.

Given under my hand and seal of the Court, this the 9th day of October, 2018.

II ADDL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ADONI,

F.A.C.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,PATTIKONDA.

MEMO OF COSTS

Particulars For Plaintiff For defendant

Vakalath 2-00- Exparte -

Stamp on plaint1,626-00-

Stamp on process 70-00-

Advocate Fee 991-00-

Typing charges 50-00-

Total 2,739-00

II ADDL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ADONI,

F.A.C.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,PATTIKONDA.

Page 2 3 O.S. NO. 94/2018

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

PRESENT : Smt.M.MADHAVI,

II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ADONI

F.A.C.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

TUESDAY, THIS THE 9 th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2018.

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.94/2018

Between:

K.Chandrasekhar Reddy… Plaintiff

and

Sugali Bali Reddy Naik...Defendant.

:: JUDGMENT ::

1.The suit is filed against the defendant for the recovery an amount of

Rs.25,670/ on the foot of promissory note and for costs of the suit.

2.The plaintiff submits that on 2652015, defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.15,000/ in cash from the plaintiff for his family necessities, agreeing to repay the same on demand with interest at 24% per annum and executed promissory note in favour of the plaintiff. Inspite of oral demands and by issuing legal notice dated 1842018 by the plaintiff, the defendant did not choose to repay the borrowed amount with interest. Hence, the suit.

3. On receipt of summons, the defendant did not appear before the

Court, called absent and set exparte.

Page 3 4 O.S. NO. 94/2018

4.During trial, plaintiff examined himself as PW.1 and got exhibited documents A.1 to A.4 on his behalf.

5.Heard the counsel for the plaintiff. Perused record.

6.Now, the points for determination are :

1) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover the suit amount ?

2) To what relief ?

7.The case of the plaintiff is that defendant borrowed Rs.15,000/ on 2652015 agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum as and when demanded. The plaintiff demanded defendant orally and by issuing legal notice dated 1842018, but, defendant failed to repay the suit amount along with interest. The defendant is set exparte to the suit proceedings. Exparte evidence of plaintiff is recorded. The plaintiff got marked Ex.A.1 to Ex.A.4 on his behalf. Ex.A.1 is Suit promissory note, Ex.A.2 is office copy of the legal notice,

Ex.A.3 is postal receipt for legal notice and Ex.A.4 is refused postal cover. The evidence of plaintiff is found to be consistent, cogent and trustworthy. The unchallenged testimony of plaintiff shows that the plaintiff is entitled to recover suit amount along with interest. Hence, plaintiff is entitled to recover the suit amount.

8.IN THE RESULT, the suit of the plaintiff is decreed with costs against the defendant for a sum of Rs.25,670/ and with subsequent interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the filing the suit till date of decree and thenceforth at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the decree till realization on principal amount i.e. Rs.15,000/

Typed to my dictation by Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in the Open Court, this the 9th day of October, 2018.

Page 4 5 O.S. NO. 94/2018

II ADDL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ADONI,

F.A.C.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,PATTIKONDA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF : FOR DEFENDANT:

PW.1 : K.Chandrasekhar Reddy NONE

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF : FOR DEFENDANT:

Ex.A.1: Original Promissory note dated 2652015.NIL Ex.A.2 : Office copy of legal notice dated 1842018 Ex.A.3 : Original Postal receipt dated 1842018 Ex.A.4 : Served postal acknowledgement dated 2642018.

II ADDL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ADONI,

F.A.C.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,PATTIKONDA.

Page 5

Order Record 1,070 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OS/129/2020	Kanne Mallikarjuna vs The Yemmiganur Spinning Mills Ltd., rep. by its chairman P.Neelappa,	26 Jun 2020	Others	—
OS/126/2020	N.Veeresh vs B.K.Ramaiah	18 Jun 2020	Others	—
OS/86/2019	K.PAKKIRAPPA vs GOLLA PANDU RANGANNA	16 Jun 2020	Judgement	—
OS/178/2019	Singam Venkateswarulu vs B.R.Surya Narayana Reddy	16 Jun 2020	Judgement	—
OS/204/2017	PRONOTE - Nese Muthyalaiah. vs M.Siddeswari.	16 Jun 2020	Judgement	—
OS/96/2020	C.Dattu vs Ediga Durugappa	05 Jun 2020	Others	—
OS/99/2020	Shaikshavali vs E.Sekhar Goud	05 Jun 2020	Others	—
OS/102/2020	Syndicate Bank, Adoni Branch rep. by its present Asst., Manager S.Raghu Prasad vs B.Nissar Ahmed	05 Jun 2020	Others	—
OS/105/2020	Golla Nagaveni@Bujji vs B.Shanthi	05 Jun 2020	Others	—
OS/108/2020	Canara Bank, Adoni branch rep. by its present Manager A.Jagadish vs K.Kalamma	05 Jun 2020	Others	—
OS/111/2020	Canara Bank, Adoni branch, rep. by its present manager A.Jagadish vs K.Pedda Lakshmanna	05 Jun 2020	Others	—
OS/114/2020	Canara bank, Adoni rep by its present Manager A.Jagadish vs Vallur Savaramma	05 Jun 2020	Others	—
OS/117/2020	Karnataka Bank Ltd., Adoni branch. rep by its branch Manager Sathyajith N vs Smt.K.Rashmi	05 Jun 2020	Others	—
OS/120/2020	B.Haroon Basha vs S.Bheemudu	05 Jun 2020	Others	—
OS/123/2020	Police Chinna Ranganna vs Bantrothu Srikanth	05 Jun 2020	Others	—
OS/93/2020	M.F.Maimunnisa Begam vs K.Ghousia	19 Mar 2020	Others	—
OS/64/2019	UPPARA CHENNAPPA vs CHAKALA RAVINDRA	13 Mar 2020	Judgement	—
OS/65/2019	UPPARA CHENNAPPA vs CHAKALA NARAYANA	13 Mar 2020	Judgement	—
OS/150/2019	Pujari Hultheppa vs Kuruva Katar Nagaraju @ Katari Nagaraju	13 Mar 2020	Judgement	—
OS/183/2019	Jollu Bhaskar vs Jinkala Habeeb Basha	13 Mar 2020	Judgement	—
OS/188/2019	V.Rangaswamy vs P.Rajinamma	13 Mar 2020	Judgement	—
CC/78/2016	G. Kumara Swamy. vs Banothu Rajalingam.	13 Mar 2020	Judgement	—
CC/78/2016	G. Kumara Swamy. vs Banothu Rajalingam.	13 Mar 2020	Order	—
CC/258/2017	Sub - Inpsector of Police, Gonegandla ps vs A-1 Shaik Peeranapeera	13 Mar 2020	Others	—
CC/553/2019	STATE REPRESENTED BY SHO OF PATHIKONDA UPS vs RAGULA MAHESH	13 Mar 2020	Others	—
MC/17/2016	Yerukali Lakshmi Devi. vs Yerukali Thayappa.	13 Mar 2020	Order	—
PRC/3/2020	S.H.O TUGGALI ,P.S vs BOYA ALIGIRI BALAKRISHNA	13 Mar 2020	Order	—
OS/84/2020	H.Siddappa vs S.Shankar Reddy	11 Mar 2020	Others	—
OS/87/2020	T.Jakeer Hussain vs K.Nazima	11 Mar 2020	Others	—
OS/81/2020	K.Basava Raju vs H.Thikkappa	10 Mar 2020	Others	—
OS/214/2018	Kota Venkateswarulu vs Doddi Ramanjineyulu	06 Mar 2020	Judgement	—
CC/156/2016	Kapu Muni Reddy vs Vemugodu Prathap Reddy. A-1	06 Mar 2020	Judgement	—
CC/293/2016	Gutti Kuruva Harischandra. vs Kuruva Sarath Babu.	06 Mar 2020	Judgement	—
PRC/13/2019	STATE REPRESENTED BY SHO PATHIKONDA PS vs BOYA RAVI KUMAR@RAVI	06 Mar 2020	Order	—
OS/75/2020	C.Shantha Bai vs Y.Vijay Kumar	06 Mar 2020	Others	—
OS/78/2020	N.Mallikarjuna vs N.Janardhana	06 Mar 2020	Others	—
OS/370/2019	M.S.Fayaz vs Ravi Shankarappa	05 Mar 2020	Judgment	—
OS/72/2020	V.Pavan Kumar vs N.Bhoja Rajendra Prasad	03 Mar 2020	Others	—
OS/171/2019	K.Chakardhar Reddy vs Gowli Nagaraju	28 Feb 2020	Judgement	—
OS/263/2017	PRONOTE - C.Venkateswar Reddy. vs N.Surendra Reddy.	28 Feb 2020	Judgement	—
CC/80/2015	Mala Rangaswamy vs Mala Sekhar	28 Feb 2020	Judgement	—
CC/137/2014	Banavath Manohar Naik vs Banavath Raju Naik	28 Feb 2020	Judgement	—
CC/200/2014	Banavath Raju Naik vs Banavath Manohar Naik	28 Feb 2020	Judgement	—
CC/261/2016	Gutti Hai Chandra. vs Kuruva Sarath Babu.	28 Feb 2020	Judgement	—
OS/69/2020	G.Cholavardhan Kumar vs M.Mallikarjunudu	27 Feb 2020	Others	—
OS/63/2020	IDBI Bank Limited, Adoni Branch rep by its Branch Manager Mujeeb Basha vs Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy Fertilizers by its prop. G.Urukunda Reddy	25 Feb 2020	Others	—
OS/66/2020	ICICI Bank limited rep by its manager L.Ramesh vs T.Siddappa	25 Feb 2020	Others	—
OS/266/2016	H.B. Govardhan Reddy vs A.P Agro Industries, Ananthpuram and another	18 Feb 2020	Judgment	—
OS/54/2020	The Adoni Mutual Benefit Permanent Fund Ltd, Adoni rep by its President Y.Pratap vs A.Shivaraju	14 Feb 2020	Others	—
OS/57/2020	H.Shashidhar vs Boya Ramireddy	14 Feb 2020	Others	—
EP/120/2019	Kapil chits hyd Pvt. Ltd.Adoni vs Bachu.Pandarikamaiah setty	13 Feb 2020	Order	—
EP/139/2019	Kapil Chit Hyderabad Pvt Ltd rep by Y.Venugopal vs U.Ramu	13 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/587/2018	State Bank of India, Adoni Branch, Rep.by K.N.Murali Krishna vs Kandukuri Laxmi Devi	13 Feb 2020	Order	—
OS/51/2020	B.Rajasekhar Reddy vs Begari Ganagappa	12 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/1/2020	SHO PATHIKONDA PS vs B RUKMINAMMA@ RUPLAMMA	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/2/2020	SHO PATHIKONDA PS vs DEVAMMA	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/17/2020	SHO GONEGANDLA PS vs VADLA RAVINDRACHARI	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/30/2018	SHO-GONEGANDLA P.S- Shaik Mumtaz Begam-D/Com vs Shaik Ismail	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/32/2020	Proh and excise Inspector vs Boya Nagaraju	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/33/2020	Proh and excise Inspector vs Boya Ramanna	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/34/2020	Proh and excise Inspector vs Boya Bulleni Hanumanthu	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/35/2020	Proh and excise Inspector vs Kolantla Thimmappa	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/36/2020	Proh and excise Inspector vs Boya Eranna	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/37/2020	Proh and excise Inspector vs Boya Muchu Ramanjaneyulu	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/38/2020	Proh and excise Inspector vs Shaik Raziya	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/39/2020	Proh and excise Inspector vs Boya Pasuvula Hanumanthu	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/40/2020	SHO OF JONNAGIRI PS vs R DHAMMA BAI	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/41/2020	SHO OF JONNAGIRI PS vs KAVALI KADIRAMMA	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/42/2020	sho jonnagiri ps vs Vskunthavath kanthamma	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/44/2020	SHO GONEGANDLA PS vs BOYA VENKATESH	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/45/2020	SHO GONEGANLDA PS vs BOYA SRINIVASULU	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/46/2020	SHO MGONEGANDLA PS vs KURUVA ANJINEYULU	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/47/2020	STATE REPRESENTED BY SHO DEVANAKONDA PS vs DISEL BADESAB	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/48/2020	STATE REPRESENTED BY SHO DEVANAKONDA PS vs MADIGA VENKATA RAMUDU	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/49/2020	SHO GONEGANDLA PS vs HARIJANA JANU	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/50/2020	STATE REPRESENTED BY SHO PATHIKONDA UPS vs DASARI GOPAL.	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/157/2017	SHO-JONNAGIRI P.S.- Yerukala Ramakka-D/Complainant vs Ragiri Ramesh. A-1	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/161/2016	Boya Urukundu vs Boya Jayaramudu.	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/205/2016	Madiga Madhu. vs Madiga Raju.	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/225/2019	Sho Maddikera vs Gundlakonda Gopal	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/226/2019	SHO Maddikera PS vs AnumuRaju Lakshmanaswamy	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/327/2017	SHO-TUGGALI P.S. - Sangala Suresh Kumar-D/complainant vs Balaji Hanumanthu - A-1	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/413/2019	SHO GONEGANDLA PS vs PINJARI MASTAN	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/502/2019	S.H.O. TUGGALI P.S vs KUNTI CHENNAKESHAVULU	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/534/2018	State Rep. by SI of Police of Gonegandla PS vs Kuruva Ramudu and others	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/537/2019	Proh and excise Inspector vs Harijanna Rangamma	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
CC/542/2019	Proh and excise Inspector vs K.Surya narayana	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
MC/4/2019	UPPARI MANIDEEPA@SHAREESHMA vs UPPARA CHANDRASEKHAR	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
MC/9/2018	S.Asiya Bee vs A.Mabu Hussain	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
MC/10/2017	Shaik Shameena- Petitioner No.1 vs Shaik Rahamathulla	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
MC/14/2016	Gajula Nagaveni @ Lakshmi Devi. vs Gajula Raghavaiah.	08 Feb 2020	Others	—
EP/83/2019	S.V.Veerachary vs Y.Ram Ranjit Kumar	08 Feb 2020	Order	—
OS/63/2017	KURUVA AYYANNA vs KURUVA PUNDUKURA LINGAMMA	08 Feb 2020	Order	—
OS/346/2019	Noor Jahan vs P.Rehman Basha	08 Feb 2020	Order	—
OS/78/2019	CHINTHAMANU MANJULA vs POTLANNAGARI LAKSHMANNA	07 Feb 2020	Judgement	—
OS/80/2019	P.SAYANARAYANA REDDYU vs TALARI PARAMESHU	07 Feb 2020	Judgement	—
OS/101/2019	P.Bharath Yas Reddy vs H.Mallesh	07 Feb 2020	Judgement	—
OS/217/2019	P. LAKSHMI DEVI vs B. GIREENDRA	07 Feb 2020	Judgement	—
CC/348/2015	Kummari Nallanna vs Mala Pinjari Muniswamy.	07 Feb 2020	Judgement	—
PRC/14/2019	SHO OF PATHIKONDA UPS vs HARIJANA NAGARAJU	07 Feb 2020	Order	—

Showing 100 of 1,070 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Jun 2020		15
Mar 2020		23
Feb 2020		67
Jan 2020		28
Dec 2019		610
Nov 2019		22
Oct 2019		20
Sep 2019		64
Aug 2019		12
Jul 2019		119
Jun 2019		14
May 2019		8

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has M Madhavi handled?

M Madhavi has handled 1084 court orders since 2018 at II Addl District Court Adoni. The average disposal rate is 64 orders per month.

What types of cases does M Madhavi hear?

Based on available records, M Madhavi primarily handles Criminal matters (Criminal Cases) and Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) at II Addl District Court Adoni.

Where is M Madhavi currently posted?

M Madhavi is posted as Additional Junior Civil Judge at II Addl District Court Adoni, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by M Madhavi available online?

Yes. 14 judgments by M Madhavi are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does M Madhavi dispose cases?

M Madhavi disposes approximately 64 cases per month, based on 1084 orders handled over their tenure at II Addl District Court Adoni.

Since when is M Madhavi serving?

M Madhavi has been serving at II Addl District Court Adoni since 2018.

Case Types

CC 80%

OS 15%

PRC 2%

EP 2%

MC 1%

DVC 0%

Posting History

Nov 2019 — Jan 2020

Additional Junior Civil Judge · 578 orders
Nov 2019 — Jul 2020

Principal Junior Civil Judge · 82 orders
Apr 2019 — Jul 2020

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE · 342 orders
Aug 2018 — Oct 2018

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE · 82 orders

Other Judges at this Court

D Lakshmi

II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

1 orders

Sri G. Yagna Narayana

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ADONI

594 orders

Sri M.Leela Sai Subhash

Additional Junior Civil Judge

1,920 orders

Smt.g.archana

Principal Junior Civil Judge

534 orders

← View all judges at II Addl District Court Adoni