Miss M.Prameela Rani

Additional Junior Civil Judge

II Addl District Court Adoni · Kurnool · Andhra Pradesh

Miss M.Prameela Rani, Additional Junior Civil Judge, is posted at II Addl District Court Adoni, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India. 264 court orders on record since 2012. 15 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, EP, CC cases.

264

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

OS/49/2012

Syndicate bank Adoni branch,rep -present Manager. vs Y.Jayarami Reddy and another

26 Jul 2014

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE: ADONI.

Present: Sri J. Vikram, Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Adoni. Wednesday the 26th day of February, 2014

O.S. No.49/2012

Between: Syndicate Bank, Adoni Branch,represented by its present Manager…. Plaintif

And

1. Y. Jayarami Reddy

2. D.V. Krishnaiah …. Defendants

This suit is coming on this day before me for fnal hearing in the presence of Sri P. Jayatheertha, Advocate for the plaintif and the defendants having remained ex parte and having stood over for consideration till this day and this Court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

This is a suit fled by the plaintif bank against the defendants on the strength of a loan agreement executed by 1st defendant and for costs of the suit.

2. The brief averments in the plaint are that: The 1st defendant approached the plaintif bank for fnancial assistance and made an application dated 29-10-2007. After verifcation, the plaintif bank has sanctioned a sum of Rs.50,000/- to the 1st defendant repayable with interest at 15.5% p.a. within 60 equated monthly instalments of Rs.1205/- commencing from 30-11-2007 and the entire loan amount has to be repaid on or before 31-10-2012. The 2nd defendant stood as guarantor for the loan of the 1st defendant. The 1st defendant executed a general agreement dated 29-10-2007 for Rs.50,000/- in favour of the plaintif bank and the 2nd defendant executed a guarantee agreement in favour of the plaintif bank.

Inspite of repeated demands made by the plaintif bank, the 1st defendant failed to repay the loan instalments regularly. Inspite of issuance of legal notice on dated 10-1-2011, the defendants failed to pay the loan amount.

Hence the plaintif bank fled the suit for recovery of loan amount along with its interest for a total amount of Rs.54,916/-.

3. The defendants were served with the summons but they failed to appear before this court and therefore, were set ex parte.

4. On behalf of the plaintif bank, one N.N.V. Surya Mohan, present

Manager entered the witness box and fled his chief afdavit and got marked

Exs.A-1 to A-5. Ex.A-1 is the loan application dated 29-10-2007, Ex.A-2 is the original loan agreement dated 29-10-2007, Ex.A-3 is the original guarantee agreement dated 29-10-2007 executed by 2nd defendant in favour of plaintif bank, Ex.A-4 is the ofce copy of legal notice dated 10-1-2011 and

Ex.A-5 is the account extract. On perusal of the Ex.A-2 it goes to suggest that the said loan agreement was executed in favour of the plaintif bank for

Rs.50,000/-. As the defendants failed to appear before this court and contest the suit an adverse inference is raised against the defendants that in order to evade the suit amount they failed to appear before this court. Therefore, it is considered that the defendants are liable to repay the suit amount along with its interest to P.W-1.

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs granting a decree for recovery of Rs.54,916/- (Rupees Fifty four thousands nine hundred and sixteen only) with interest at the rate of 12% p.a., from the date of suit to till the date of decree and thereafter future interest at the rate of 6% p.a., on

Rs.50,000/- till the date of realization from the defendants 1 and 2 jointly and severally.

Directly typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court, this the 26th day of February, 2014.

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ADONI.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintif : For Defendants:

P.W-1: N.N.V. Surya Mohan-None-

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR PLAINTIFF

Ex.A-1: Loan application dated 29-10-2007

Ex.A-2: Original General agreement dated 29-10-2007 executed by 1st defendant in favour of plaintif bank for Rs.50,000/-

Ex.A-3: Original guarantee agreement dated 29-10-2007 executed by 2nd defendant in favour of plaintif bank

Ex.A-4: Ofce copy of legal notice dated 10-1-2011

Ex.A-5: Account extract.

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR DEFENDANTS

-Nil-

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ADONI.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE: ADONI.

Present: Sri J. Vikram, Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Adoni. Wednesday the 26th day of February, 2014

O.S. No.49/2012

Between:

Syndicate Bank, a Bank constituted and functioning under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of undertakings) Act 1970 with its Head Ofce at Manipal in Udupi District of Karnataka State and one of its Branches at Adoni, represented by its present Manager. …. Plaintif

And

1. Y. Jayarami Reddy, S/o Y. Hanumantha Reddy, Hindu, aged about 50 years, Working as Conductor in A.P.S.R.T.C., Banaganapalli Depot, Kurnool District.

2. D.V. Krishnaiah, S/o D.V. Subbaiah, Hindu, aged about 55 years, R/o Door No. 64-164, S.Nagappa Street, Kurnool. …. Defendants

Suit for recovery of Rs.54,916/- being the principal and interest.

On application of the 1st defendant dated 29-10-2007 the plaintif bank sanctioned an amount of Rs.50,000/- to repay the same at Rs.1205/- in 60 monthly instalments with interest at 15.5.% p.a. The 2nd defendant stood as guarantor to the loan of the 1st defendant. The 1st defendant executed a loan agreement dated 29-10-2007 in favour of the bank and also receipt. The 2nd defendant has executed guarantee agreement dated 29-10-2007. The 1st defendant has paid the last part payment on 30-9-2009. Inspite of repeated demands made by plaintif bank and also on issuance of notice dated 10-1-2011, the defendants failed to repay the amount due to the bank.

Plaint presented on 6-3-2012 and fled on 12-3-2012. Jurisdiction value of Rs. 54,916/- and Court fee of Rs.2546/- is paid u/Sec.20 of the

A.P.C.F. and Suit Valuation Act.

Cause of action for the suit arose on 29-10-2007 the date of borrowing and execution of loan documents at Adoni; on 10-1-2011 the date of last part payment.

This suit coming on this day before me for fnal disposal in the presence of Sri P. Jayatheertha, Advocate for the plaintif and the defendants 1 and 2 remained ex parte and this Court doth order and decree :

1) That the suit be and the same is hereby decreed;

2) that the defendants 1 and 2 jointly and severally do pay to the plaintif a sum of Rs.54,916/- (Rupees Fifty four thousand nine hundred and sixteen only) with interest at the rate of 12% p.a., from the date of suit i.e., 6-3-12 to till the date of decree and thereafter future interest at the rate of 6% p.a., on Rs.50,000/- till the date of realization;

3) that the defendants 1 and 2 also do pay to the plaintif a sum of Rs. 4773-00 towards the costs of the suit.

Given under my hand and the seal of this Court, this the 26th day of February, 2014.

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ADONI.

MEMO OF COSTS

Plaintif Defendants

Rs. Ps. Rs. Ps.

1. Stamps on plaint 2546-00

2. Stamps on vakalat 2-00 Exparte

3. Advocate fee 1670-00

4. Publication charges 500-00

5. P.W charges 5-00

6. Typing charges 50-00 --------------- 4773-00 ----------------

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ADONI.

OS/178/2013

N.Ramathulasamma vs N.Madhumanohar rao

20 Feb 2015

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE: ADONI.

Present: Miss. M. Prameela Rani, Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Adoni. Friday the 20th day of February, 2015

O.S. No.178/2013

Between:

Smt. N. Rama Thulasamma …. Plaintif

And

N. Madhu Manohar Rao …. Defendant

This suit is coming on 18-2-2015 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri J.Venkatesulu, Advocate for the plaintif and of Sri M. Janardhan, Advocate for the defendant, after hearing both sides, having stood over for consideration till this day and this Court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

This suit is filed for recovery of Rs.31,250/- being the principal, interest and demand charges due on the promissory note dated 1-8-2012 executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintif for

Rs.26,000/- repayable with interest at 36% p.a. Interest is claimed at 24% p.a. as the defendant is not an agriculturist and for costs.

2. The brief averments in the plaint are on 1-8-2012, the defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.26,000/- from the plaintif in cash for his necessity agreeing to repay the same with interest at 36% p.a. on demand. In evidence of it, he executed a promissory note in favour of the plaintif for the said amount on the same day. Inspite of several oral demands by the plaintif, the defendant has not paid any amount either towards the principal or towards the interest. The plaintif got issued a legal notice on 14-5-2013 to the defendant but the defendant failed to pay the debt amount. Hence, this suit.

3.After receiving the summons from this court, the defendant engaged a counsel and filed written statement denying all the allegations leveled against him and submitted that he never borrowed an amount of Rs.26,000/- from the plaintif and never executed any promissory note in favour of the plaintif. The plaintif filed this suit falsely and in a habit of creating promissory notes with a malafide intention to make easy money.

It is further submitted that the plaintif forged the signature of the defendant and filed this suit for wrongful gain. Hence, this suit is not maintainable. Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the suit with costs.

4. Basing on the above pleadings of both the parties, the following issues were framed for trial :

1. Whether the suit pronote dated 1-8-2012 is true, valid and binding on the defendant?

2. Whether the plaintif is entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendant?

3. Whether the suit pronote is forged and created for the purpose of filing this suit?

4. To what relief?

5. To prove the case, the plaintif examined herself as P.W-1 and got marked Exs. A-1 to A-3. The defendant did not adduce any evidence on his behalf and did not got marked any documents.

6. Heard both sides.

7. For the sake of convenience and proper appreciation of the facts on hand, issue Nos. 1 to 3 are answered together.

8.ISSUE NOs.1 TO 3:- To prove these facts, the plaintif relied upon her evidence. In her chief affidavit, she has reiterated the contents of her plaint and got marked Exs. A-1 to A-3.

9. The contention of the plaintif is that on 1-8-2012, the defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.26,000/- from her in cash for his necessity agreeing to repay the same with interest at 36% p.a. In support of her evidence, she got marked the original promissory note

dated 1-8-2012 as Ex.A-1. On a perusal of Ex.A-1 promissory note, it is

found that it was executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintif on 1-8-2012 for Rs.26,000/-.

10. The further contention of the plaintif is that though she has demanded the defendant orally several times and got issued a legal notice to the defendant demanding to pay the debt amount, the defendant failed to pay the amount. In support of her contention, she got marked the office copy of the legal notice dated 14-5-2013 as Ex.A- 2 and postal receipt as Ex.A-3. P.W-1 is not cross-examined by the defendant counsel. On the date of cross-examination, the defendant is called absent and there was no representation on behalf of the defendant. Hence, the cross-examination of P.W-1 is treated as Nil.

11. From the evidence of P.W-1 coupled with Exs. A-1 to A-3, it is established that the plaintif has given Rs.26,000/- to the defendant under a promissory note and the defendant failed to repay the same as the defendant failed to cross-examine P.W-1 there is no material on record to discredit the testimony of P.W-1. Though the defendant has taken a plea of forgery of his signature by the plaintif on Ex.A-1 promissory note, the defendant failed to adduce his evidence or cross- examined P.W-1 to prove the same. Therefore, this court is of the view that the plaintif is entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendant. Accordingly, the issue Nos.1 to 3 are answered in favour of the plaintif and against the defendant.

12. ISSUE NO.4:- In view of the findings on issue Nos. 1 to 3, the plaintif is entitled to recover the suit amount along with interest from the defendant.

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs for an amount of

Rs.31,250/- (Rupees Thirty one thousand two hundred and fifty only) with subsequent interest at 12% p.a. on Rs.26,000/- from the date of the suit till the date of the decree and thereafter at 6% p.a. till the date of realization.

Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by her, corrected

and pronounced by me, in the open court, this the 20th day of February, 2015.

PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ADONI.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintif For Defendant P.W-1: Smt. N. Rama Thulasamma -None-

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR PLAINTIFF

Ex.A-1: Original promissory note dated 1-8-2002 for Rs.26,000/- executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintif. Ex.A-2: Office copy of legal notice dated 14-5-2013 Ex.A-3: Original postal receipt dated 15-5-2013.

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR DEFENDANT

-Nil-

PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ADONI.

OS/130/2013

Canara bank Adoni branch,rep -present Manager. vs D.P.Venugopal Reddy

19 Mar 2015

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE: ADONI.

Present: Miss M. Prameela Rani, Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Adoni. Thursday the 19th day of March, 2015

O.S. No.130/2013

Between:

Canara Bank, Adoni Branch, rep. by its present Manager …. Plaintif

And

D.P.Venugopal Reddy …. Defendant

This suit coming on 17-3-2015 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri P. Jayatheertha and Smt. M. Suneetha, Advocates for the plaintif and the defendant having remained ex parte and after hearing the counsel for the plaintif and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

This suit is filed for recovery of Rs.91,590/- being the principal and interest due on an application of defendant to the plaintif bank and the plaintif bank sanctioned an amount of Rs.54,000/- to repay the same at 13.25% p.a. within 60 equated instalments and for costs.

2. The brief averments of the plaint are that on 5-7-2007, the defendant approached the plaintif bank for financial assistance and on his application the plaintif bank sanctioned a sum of Rs.54,000/- to the defendant. The defendant agreed to repay the same with interest at 13.25% p.a. within 60 equated monthly instalments of Rs.1240/- each.

The defendant has executed an acknowledgment of debt dated 29-6-2007 acknowledging the amount due to the plaintif bank. Inspite of repeated demands made by the plaintif bank and also on issuance of notice dated 12-12-2012 the defendant failed to repay the loan amount. Hence, this suit.

3. Though publication is given the defendant did not appear

before this court. Hence, on 6-3-2015 the defendant is set ex parte by

this court.

4. To prove the case, the plaintif bank examined its Manager as

P.W-1 and got marked Exs. A-1 to A-6.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the plaintif and perused the record.

6. Now the point for determination is:

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendant as prayed for?

7. POINT:- P.W-1 in his chief affidavit reiterated the contents of his claim and in support of his contention he got marked Exs. A-1 to

A-6. Since, the defendant remained ex parte, the evidence of P.W-1 remained unchallenged.

8. On a perusal of the unchallenged evidence of P.W-1 coupled with Exs. A-1 to A-6, it establishes that the defendant approached the plaintif bank and obtained loan for Rs.54,000/- and agreed to pay the same with 13.25% p.a. in 60 monthly instalments with Rs.1240/- by accepting the terms and conditions mentioned in the loan agreement.

The defendant has executed acknowledgment of debt dated 29-6-2010 acknowledging the amount due to the plaintif bank. But inspite of oral demands made by the plaintif and after giving the legal notice on

dated 12-12-2012, the defendant failed to pay the amount. Therefore,

this court feels that the plaintif bank is entitled to recover the suit amount as prayed for. Accordingly, the point is answered in favour of 3 the plaintif and against the defendant.

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs for an amount of

Rs.91,590/- (Rupees Ninety one thousand five hundred and ninety only) with subsequent interest at 12% p.a. on Rs.54,000/- from the date of the suit till the date of decree and thereafter at 6% p.a. till the date of realization.

Directly typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court, this the 19th day of March, 2015.

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ADONI.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintif : For Defendant :

P.W-1: L. Krishna Mohan -None-

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR PLAINTIFF

Ex.A-1: Loan application of the defendant dated 5-7-2007

Ex.A-2: Original composite loan agreement dated 5-7-2007 executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintif bank for Rs.54,000/-.

Ex.A-3: Acknowledgment of debt dated 29-6-2010 executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintif bank.

Ex.A-4: Office copy of legal notice dated 12-12-2012

Ex.A-5: Unserved postal cover

Ex.A-6: Attested copy of the account extract of the defendant maintained by the plaintif bank.

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR DEFENDANT

-Nil-

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ADONI.

OS/285/2014

B.NARDADHA vs K.ERANNA

23 Mar 2015

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE: ADONI.

Present: Miss M. Prameela Rani, Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Adoni. Monday the 23rd day of March, 2015

O.S. No.285/2014

Between:

B. Narmadha …. Plaintif

And

K.Eranna …. Defendant

This suit coming on 18-3-2015 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri T. Ravindra and Smt. Padma Desai, Advocates for the plaintif and the defendant having remained ex parte and after hearing the counsel for the plaintif and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

This suit is for recovery of a sum of Rs.23,835/- being the

principal amount, interest and demand charges due on a promissory

note dated 11-7-2012 executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintif for Rs.15,000/- repayable with interest at 24% p.a. and for costs.

2. The brief averments of the plaint are that on 11-7-2012, the defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.15,000/- from the plaintif to meet his personal needs. In evidence of it, he executed a promissory note in favour of the plaintif agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a. Inspite of several oral demands and issuing legal notice dated 30-6-2014 to the defendant, the defendant failed to pay the amount.

Again on 8-8-2014, the plaintif got issued another legal notice calling upon the defendant to pay the amount due under the suit promissory note. On 11-8-2014, the defendant received the same but failed to comply the same. Hence, this suit.

3. The defendant though received summons remained ex parte.

Hence, this court treated him ex parte on 3-2-2015.

4. The plaintif in order to prove her case examined herself as

P.W-1 and got marked Exs.A-1 to A-5.

5. Heard the counsel for the plaintif.

6. Now the point for determination is:

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendant as prayed for?

7. POINT:- P.W-1 in her chief affidavit she reiterated the contents of her plaint and in support of her contention, she got marked Exs. A-1 to A-5. Since, the defendant remained ex parte, the evidence of P.W-1 remained unchallenged.

8. On a perusal of the unchallenged evidence of P.W-1, it is established that the defendant has borrowed a sum of Rs.15,000/- on 11-7-2012 from the plaintif promising to pay the same with interest at 24% p.a. for the purpose of his personal needs. Ex.A-1 promissory note proves the same and inspite of the oral demands and also issuance of Ex.A-2 and A-4 legal notices dated 30-6-2014 and 8-8-2014, the defendant failed to pay the debt. On 11-8-2014, the defendant received the legal notice dated 8-8-2014 but failed to comply the same. Therefore, this court is of the view that the plaintif is entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendant as prayed for.

Accordingly, the point is answered in favour of the plaintif and against the defendant.

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs for an amount of 3

Rs.23,835/- (Rupees Twenty three thousand eight hundred and thirty five only) with subsequent interest at 12% p.a. on Rs.15,000/- from the date of the suit till the date of decree and thereafter at 6% p.a. till the date of realization from the defendant.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court, this the 23rdday of March, 2015.

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ADONI.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintif : For Defendant :

P.W-1: B. Narmadha -None-

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR PLAINTIFF

Ex.A-1: Original Promissory note dated 11-7-2012 executed by the defendant in favour of plaintif for Rs.15,000/-

Ex.A-2: Office copy of legal notice dated 30-6-2014 along with postal receipt

Ex.A-3: Served acknowledgment.

Ex.A-4: Office copy of legal notice dated 8-8-2014 along with postal receipt

Ex.A-5: Served postal acknowledgment.

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR DEFENDANT

-Nil-

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ADONI.

OS/267/2014

KATHI ANJINAIAH vs BECHALA ERANNA

30 Jan 2015

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE: ADONI.

Present: Miss M. Prameela Rani, Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Adoni. Friday the 30th day of January, 2015

O.S. No.267/2014

Between:

Kathi Anjinaiah …. Plaintif

And

Bechala Eranna …. Defendant

This suit coming on 29-1-2015 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri G.C.Ranganna, Advocate for the plaintif and the defendant having remained ex parte and after hearing the counsel for the plaintif and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

This suit is for recovery of a sum of Rs.55,040/- being the principal and interest due on a promissory note dated 25-11-2011 for Rs. 32,000/- executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintif repayable with interest at 24% p.a. and for costs.

2. The brief averments of the plaint are that on 25-11-2011, the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.32,000/- from the plaintif for his family necessities and in evidence thereof he executed a promissory note in favour of the plaintif agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a.

Subsequently inspite of several oral demands made by the plaintif the defendant did not discharge the debt. Hence, this suit.

3. After receiving the summons from this court, the defendant remained ex parte on 23-1-2015.

4. In order to prove the claim, the plaintif examined himself as P.W-1 and got marked Ex.A-1.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the plaintif and perused the record.

6. Now the point for determination is:

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendant as prayed for?

7. POINT:- P.W-1 in his chief affidavit he reiterated the contents of his plaint. Since, the defendant remained ex parte, the evidence of P.W-1 remained unchallenged.

8. On a careful perusal of the unchallenged evidence of P.W-1 coupled with Ex. A-1, this court is of the view that the plaintif has established that the defendant having borrowed the amount of Rs.32,000/- under Ex.A-1 promissory note and failed to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a. inspite of repeated demands made by the plaintif. Therefore, this court is of the view that the plaintif is entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendant. Accordingly, the point is answered in favour of the plaintif and against the defendant.

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs for an amount of

Rs.55,040/- (Rupees Fifty five thousand and forty only) with subsequent interest at 12% p.a. on Rs.32,000/- from the date of the suit till the date of decree and thereafter at 6% p.a. till the date of realization from the defendant.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court, this the 30th day of January, 2015.

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ADONI.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintif : For Defendant :

P.W-1: Kathi Anjinayya -None-

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR PLAINTIFF

Ex.A-1: Promissory note dated 25-11-2011 executed by defendant in favour of plaintif for Rs.32,000/-.

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR DEFENDANT

-Nil-

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ADONI.

Order Record 255 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
CC/70/2013	Ms. Sri Ram City Union Finance Ltd., Adoni. vs B.Chiranjeevi	23 May 2015	Judgment	Acquitted
CC/90/2014	Kuruva Saranamma vs Kuruva Linga Reddy	21 May 2015	Judgment	Settled Before Lok Adalat
CC/266/2014	SHO OF EXCISE PS vs K.DORA SWAMY AND H.MAREPPA	19 May 2015	Judgment	Acquittal Disposal Date: 13-05-2015
CC/267/2014	SHO OF EXCISE PS vs P.KHADAR BASHA	13 May 2015	Judgment	Acquittal
CC/117/2010	Giddaiah vs Golla Anjinaiah and 6 others	08 May 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/291/2009	Golla Anjinaiah vs Golla Ramudu and others	08 May 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/221/2013	K.Muralimohan Reddy vs B.Govindu	08 May 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/229/2013	M.Shoba rani vs M.Venugopal	08 May 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
EP/39/2012	Ms.Shriram Chits private.Ltd vs M.Thippanna and 3 others	07 May 2015	Others	—
OS/246/2011	Shriram Raghavendra Chits rep.byForeman B.Srikanth vs Vs1.A. Ismail and 3 others	07 May 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/83/2012	G.P.Madhu Sudhana Reddy vs B.Mohammed Yousuf	05 May 2015	Judgment	—
CC/124/2011	Ms. Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., Adoni vs R.M.NAGARAJ	05 May 2015	Judgment	—
CC/241/2014	Ms. Sri Kubera Financiers vs E.Veeranna	05 May 2015	Judgment	—
CC/275/2014	SHO OF ADONI PRO EXCISE PS vs BOYA MANTESH	05 May 2015	Judgment	—
CC/318/2013	Boya Basavaraj vs Jallaiahgari Mahadeva and 2 others	05 May 2015	Judgment	—
CC/104/2014	Shaik Noor @ Apsi vs S.Shariff	04 May 2015	Judgment	—
CC/273/2014	SHO OF ADONI EXCISE PS vs YADAVA GOPAL AND M.SARAWATHI	04 May 2015	Judgment	—
CC/370/2012	Boya Chennaiah vs Yerukali Siva	04 May 2015	Judgment	—
CC/6/2013	Golla Murali vs Golla Gopi	02 May 2015	Judgment	—
CC/64/2013	J.Eranna vs C.Raghavendra	02 May 2015	Judgment	—
CC/101/2014	Madiga Suripogu Seenu vs Madiga Suripogu Ayyappa	02 May 2015	Judgment	—
CC/188/2012	Boya Lakshmanna vs S. Shaikshavali @ Vali Sab	02 May 2015	Judgment	—
CC/272/2014	SHO OF ADONI EXCISE PS vs B.NARASIMHULU AND B.NARASAPPA	02 May 2015	Judgment	—
CC/274/2014	SHO OF ADONI EXCISE PS vs BOYA NEELAPPA	02 May 2015	Judgment	—
CC/625/2012	Syed Noor Basha vs Chakali Suri	02 May 2015	Judgment	—
CC/17/2014	Ms Share Micro Fin Ltd vs G.Nazir Ahmed	01 May 2015	Judgment	—
CC/268/2014	A.Madhava Swamy vs Ediga Suseelamma	01 May 2015	Judgment	—
CC/281/2014	A.Madhava Swamy vs Kuruva Gadilinga	01 May 2015	Judgment	—
EP/63/2011	H.Vijaya lakshmi vs P.Fakruddin	01 May 2015	Others	—
EP/76/2013	P.Suvarnamma vs K.A Usha Rani and 2 others	01 May 2015	Others	—
OS/85/2010	smt.Hanumanthamma vs Vssmt.Lingamma 8 others	01 May 2015	Others	—
CC/269/2014	A.Madhava Swamy vs Harijana Bheemesh	30 Apr 2015	Judgment	—
CC/270/2014	SHO OF ADONI EXCISE PS vs B.TALARI RANGAIAH AND B.T.THAMMAPPA	30 Apr 2015	Others	—
CC/282/2014	B.Krishna Kumar vs Harijana Thayappa @ Jabbar	30 Apr 2015	Judgment	—
EP/63/2014	Shriram Raghavendra chits private limited vs K. Venkateswarlu and 3 others	30 Apr 2015	Others	—
EP/93/2011	A.Shankarappa vs M.Chandra Sekhar Reddy	30 Apr 2015	Others	—
OS/57/2015	Reddy Vijaya Mohan Reddy vs D.Altaf Husasain	30 Apr 2015	Others	—
OS/241/2010	S.Narayana and another vs Ayyanna Chari and 2 others	30 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
EP/103/2014	Indusind bank vs M.Raja Hammad, and another	29 Apr 2015	Others	—
OS/30/2015	UCHCHAPPA -DIED- AND 6 OTHERS vs K.M.RAJASEKHAR AND ANOTHER	29 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/71/2010	Gujjula Jayalakshmi vs G.Nagaraju and 2 others	28 Apr 2015	Judgment	—
CC/160/2010	SHO OF KOWTHALAM PS vs N.S.RAJA SAHEB	28 Apr 2015	Judgment	—
EP/101/2014	Indusind bank vs Vsp. kasim sab and another	28 Apr 2015	Others	—
OS/289/2012	K.B.G.Tilak vs B.Abdul Masjeed	28 Apr 2015	Others	—
EP/103/2013	K.Buddappa vs P.Lakshmaiah	27 Apr 2015	Others	—
OS/137/2013	T.Jakheer Hussain vs Vssmt.Balkis bee	27 Apr 2015	Others	—
EP/2/2015	Kapil Chit Fund Private Limited vs M.Nagaraju and 5 others	24 Apr 2015	Others	—
EP/6/2014	Indusind bank vs Thumbalam Mabusar Pinjari	24 Apr 2015	Others	—
EP/50/2012	Syndicate Bank vs M.S Siddesh and other	23 Apr 2015	Others	—
OS/40/2012	The andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank vs Vallamagonda venkata swamy	23 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
EP/29/2013	Syndicate Bank vs B.Rajsekhar and other	22 Apr 2015	Others	—
EP/96/2013	Shriram Raghavendra Chits PVt Ltd vs T.Nagendrappa and 3 others	22 Apr 2015	Others	—
EP/20/2011	Syndicate Bank vs K.thimmappa and other	21 Apr 2015	Others	—
EP/24/2015	Sri.Madhu Auto finance vs K.Madhusudhana Rao	20 Apr 2015	Others	—
EP/135/2014	c. Raja Simha alias Chowlaiah vs G. mahesh kumar	17 Apr 2015	Others	—
EP/14/2014	L and T Finance Limited vs K. Veerabhadra goud and another	15 Apr 2015	Others	—
EP/111/2010	Vadde Satyanarayana vs V.Lakshmanna	15 Apr 2015	Order	—
OS/39/2015	Balli Eramma vs Talari Gangamma and another	15 Apr 2015	Others	—
OS/59/2011	Sree ram rachavendra chits vs K.Eranna and three others	15 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/200/2012	E.Mallikarjuna Setty vs Boya Chattamma Gari Hanumanthu	15 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/204/2013	Shriram Raghavendra Chits.Adoni.rpt by Manager vs M.Md.Iqbal and 3 others	15 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/296/2011	Polukanti Lakshmi Devamma vs Vs1. Polukanti Krishna 2. Smt. Polukanti Eramma	15 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/49/2015	Corporation Bank, Sadapuram Branch rep.K.Raja Babu vs UNNI CHINNA ERANNA	13 Apr 2015	Order	—
OS/241/2011	Shriram Raghavendra Chits rep.byForeman B.Srikanth vs M. Nagendra Chowdary and 3 others	13 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/38/2015	HASEENA BEGUM AND ANOTHER vs BANDI KHAJA @ BELAGAL KHAJA	04 Apr 2015	Others	—
OS/105/2012	Boya ambamma vs Boya Sidda Murthy	02 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
EP/13/2014	Indusind bank vs K. Nabirasool	01 Apr 2015	Others	—
EP/24/2013	V.Venkateswarulu vs P.C. Noor Mohammed	01 Apr 2015	Others	—
EP/26/2013	V.Venkateswarulu vs P.C Noor Mohammed	01 Apr 2015	Others	—
EP/84/2014	Boya Hanumanthamma and 3 others vs B.D.Narasaiah and anohter	30 Mar 2015	Others	—
OS/291/2012	Smt B.Renuka Devi vs Neelakant	26 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
EP/82/2014	Indusind bank vs P. Neelakanta and another	25 Mar 2015	Others	—
OS/166/2013	J.Nagaraju vs S.Tejappa and 5 others	25 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/211/2012	Kapil chit rep by its legal Asst. vs P.Ramesh kumar and 3 others	25 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/12/2011	sYNDICATE BANK mANAGER vs M.Manjunatha Swamy and others	23 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/144/2012	B.Krishna reddy vs G.R.Hanumantha rao	23 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/285/2014	B.NARDADHA vs K.ERANNA	23 Mar 2015	Judgment	—
OS/130/2013	Canara bank Adoni branch,rep -present Manager. vs D.P.Venugopal Reddy	19 Mar 2015	Judgment	—
EP/93/2014	Shriram city union finance co. limited vs Vss. Somanatha Reddy	18 Mar 2015	Others	—
EP/125/2014	Canara Bank vs Y. Ramamohan Reddy and another	17 Mar 2015	Others	—
EP/81/2013	P.Ramesh Babu vs G.Prabhakar Naidu	16 Mar 2015	Order	—
OS/20/2015	DR.V.SUNDAR RAO vs S.M.CHENNA BASAVARAJU AND ANOTHER	14 Mar 2015	Others	—
EP/106/2014	G. Mohan Kumar vs I. Israilu	13 Mar 2015	Others	—
OS/233/2012	G.Krishna vs P.Susheelamma	13 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/21/2015	KATIGE SHARIFA BI vs PINJARI MABU SAB	11 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
EP/158/2014	Kapil chit fund vs B. Narayanamma and 3 others	10 Mar 2015	Others	—
OS/31/2011	K.Nurulla and another vs Wahida Begum	10 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
EP/16/2011	Syndicate Bank vs Y.Thimmaraju and other	09 Mar 2015	Others	—
OS/12/2015	C.SAVITHRI vs G.NARESH BABU	06 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
EP/44/2011	R.Rudrappa and 8 others vs G.Lingamma and another	04 Mar 2015	Others	—
OS/217/2013	G.Vijaya Kumar vs K.Salman	04 Mar 2015	Others	—
OS/16/2015	Y.G.BALAJI vs G.MALLIKARJUNA	03 Mar 2015	Others	—
OS/181/2014	M. Naseer Ahmed vs The Manager of Sri Ram Transport and Fin. Co.,Adn	03 Mar 2015	Others	—
OS/452/2007	S.Md.Noor vs D.Sagar Ali.died.and 9 others	28 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
EP/17/2013	Madhu Auto finance vs K.Madhusudan Rao. adoni	27 Feb 2015	Others	—
EP/38/2013	V.Mallaiah vs K.Ampanna	26 Feb 2015	Order	—
OS/4/2015	U.G.SREENIVASULU vs S.NAGARAJU	26 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/34/2013	Bharatiya samrudhi finance ltd vs Bestha Veeresh	26 Feb 2015	Others	—
OS/51/2009	smt.K.Pushpa vs A.Madhavi and 3 others	26 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/81/2009	B.Pedda Maranna and another vs G.Chinnanarasaiah and another	26 Feb 2015	Others	—

Showing 100 of 255 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

May 2015		32
Apr 2015		42
Mar 2015		24
Feb 2015		32
Jan 2015		19
Dec 2014		11
Nov 2014		11
Oct 2014		6
Sep 2014		11
Aug 2014		14
Jul 2014		15
Jun 2014		14

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Miss M.Prameela Rani handled?

Miss M.Prameela Rani has handled 264 court orders since 2012 at II Addl District Court Adoni. The average disposal rate is 7 orders per month.

What types of cases does Miss M.Prameela Rani hear?

Based on available records, Miss M.Prameela Rani primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Criminal Cases) at II Addl District Court Adoni.

Where is Miss M.Prameela Rani currently posted?

Miss M.Prameela Rani is posted as Additional Junior Civil Judge at II Addl District Court Adoni, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Miss M.Prameela Rani available online?

Yes. 15 judgments by Miss M.Prameela Rani are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Miss M.Prameela Rani dispose cases?

Miss M.Prameela Rani disposes approximately 7 cases per month, based on 264 orders handled over their tenure at II Addl District Court Adoni.

Since when is Miss M.Prameela Rani serving?

Miss M.Prameela Rani has been serving at II Addl District Court Adoni since 2012.

Case Types

OS 58%

EP 23%

CC 19%

Posting History

Apr 2015 — May 2015

Additional Junior Civil Judge · 30 orders
Apr 2014 — May 2015

Principal Junior Civil Judge · 213 orders
Apr 2012 — Apr 2014

Additional Junior Civil Judge · 21 orders

Outcomes on Record

Settled Before Lok Adalat 5

Acquittal Disposal Date: 13-05-2015 2

Transferred 1

Acquitted 1

Acquittal 1

Other Judges at this Court

D Lakshmi

II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

1 orders

Sri G. Yagna Narayana

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ADONI

594 orders

Sri M.Leela Sai Subhash

Additional Junior Civil Judge

1,920 orders

Smt.g.archana

Principal Junior Civil Judge

534 orders

← View all judges at II Addl District Court Adoni