Smt M.V.N. Padmaja

APCH010004182025 1

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION) :: CHITTOOR

PRESENT : Smt M.V.N.PADMAJA

Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Chittoor

Wednesday, this the 06th day of May, 2026

ORIGINAL SUIT No.79/2025

Between:

A.Chandra Naidu, S/o A.Jayaram Naidu aged 61 years, Business, R/o D.No.1-172 Narigapalle Village and Post, Chittoor Mandal, Chittoor District . . . Plaintiff

And

Bondalakunta Mangamma, W/o Bondalakunta Chinna Subbarayudu, aged 66 years House Wife and Business, R/o D.No.15/1226 Sanjeeva Nagar, 2nd Road, Tadipatri Anantapur . . . Defendant

This suit coming on 28-04-2026 for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Sri V.Lokanadha Reddy, Learned Counsel for the plaintiff, and the defendant is set ex parte, and upon hearing the plaintiff, and on perusing the material on record; the matter having stood over for consideration to this day, this Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery of an amount of Rs.39,98,300/-, due based on suit promissory note, dated, 22-04-2023, executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff, with subsequent interest, and for costs.

2.The brief averments of the plaint are as follows:

The defendant and her husband were running the granite factory in Panatoor,

Chittoor area during 2003-2011. They were residing in Durga Nagar Colony,

Chittoor, and they got good acquaintance with the plaintiff, as he belongs to

APCH010004182025 2 Panatoor area. The defendant and her husband have financial dealings with the plaintiff.

3.On 22-04-2023, the defendant had borrowed an amount of Rs.25,00,000/- from the plaintiff to meet their business requirements, on execution of promissory note on the even date in favour of the plaintiff, agreeing to repay the same together with interest @ 24% p.a. The defendant also deposited her original registered sale deed dated, 06-08-1983 in respect of her house property situated at Tadipatri, and executed memorandum of deposit of title deeds, as security purpose on the even date for the amount borrowed by her.

4.In the year, 2024, the defendant and her husband left Chittoor by closing their business and promised to the plaintiff that the defendant would pay the amount due to the plaintiff within short period. In spite of repeated demands and approaches made by the plaintiff, the defendant has been evading to repay the amount on some pretext or other.

5.Recently, the plaintiff came to know that the defendant is going to alienate her immovable properties in favour of third parties in order to deprive the rights of the plaintiff. Immediately, the plaintiff got issued a legal notice dated, 21-10-2025 demanding to repay the due amount, but the defendant did not repay the amount.

Hence the suit.

6.On issuance of summons, the defendant failed to appear before the court either personally or through her learned counsel; hence she is set ex parte.

APCH010004182025 3

7.Later to prove the suit claim, the plaintiff himself examined as P.W.1 and got marked Exs.A1 to A3. The plaintiff also got examined the 1st attestor of the suit promissory note by the name, V.Satya Raj, as P.W.2.

8.Heard arguments on behalf of the plaintiff. Perused the entire material on record. Considered the evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2 coupled with Exs.A1 to A3.

9.Now the point for consideration is:

“Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the suit claim as prayed for”?

POINT:

10.On perusal of the pleadings, it is the claim of plaintiff that on 22-04-2023, the defendant had borrowed an amount of Rs.25,00,000/- from the plaintiff for the business purpose, agreeing to repay the same with interest @ 24% p.a., and executed a demand promissory note in favour of the plaintiff, and also deposited her title deed in respect of her house property, and also executed memorandum of deposit of title deeds, and in spite of repeated oral demands made by the plaintiff, the defendant failed to repay the amount; hence, the suit.

11.To substantiate the case, the plaintiff himself had filed his chief examination affidavit in lieu of the chief examination, re-iterating all the averments of the plaint, and the same was taken on file as evidence in chief of P.W.1 and got marked

Exs.A1 to A3. P.W.2, who is the 1st attestor of the suit promissory note, had supported the evidence of P.W.1 in his chief examination affidavit in respect of the transaction between the parties to the suit in his presence.

APCH010004182025 4

12.On careful perusal of the evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2 coupled with Ex.A1- original promissory note, the plaintiff herein proved the execution of the suit promissory note by the defendant, and also passing of consideration of

Rs.25,00,000/- under Ex.A1-promissory note. Further, the plaintiff demanded repayment of the due amount to the defendant under Ex.A2-office copy of legal notice, along with postal receipt dated, 21-10-2025. As per the evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2 coupled with Exs.A1 to A3, the plaintiff successfully established the transaction between the plaintiff and the defendant and the demand made by him.

13.Further, the defendant failed to appear before the court and to cross-examine

P.Ws.1 and 2. Though the defendant had knowledge, she failed to attend before the court to rebut the presumption arises Under Section 118 of Negotiable Instrument

Act. As the defendant remained ex-parte, the plea of the plaintiff has remained unchallenged. In view of the above discussion coupled with reasons, the point is accordingly answered holding that the plaintiff had sufficiently established the entitlement to a decree in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.

Accordingly, the point is answered in favour of the plaintiff.

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant for a sum of Rs.39,98,300/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of filing of suit till the date of decree, and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till date of realization on

principal amount of Rs.25,00,000/-.

APCH010004182025 5 Typed to my dictation by the typist directly, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this the 06th day of May, 2026

Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division)

Chittoor

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF : FOR DEFENDANT :

PW.1 : A.Chandra Naidu Set ex-parte PW.2 : V.Satya Raj

DOCUMENTS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF :

Ex.A1 : Original suit promissory note, dated, 22-04-2023 for Rs.25,00,000/- executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff Ex.A2 : Office copy of legal notice along with postal receipt dated, 21-10-2025 issued by the plaintiff to the defendant Ex.A3 : Original Sale deed dated, 06-08-1983 vide document No.2151/1983 in the name of the defendant executed by one Sakunthalamma

FOR DEFENDANT :

Nil

PCJ (SD)

Chittoor

APCH010004182025 6

APCH010004182025 7

Fair Judgment in

O.S.No.79/2025

Dt.06-05-2026

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION) :: CHITTOOR

PRESENT : Smt M.V.N.PADMAJA

Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Chittoor

Wednesday, this the 06th day of May, 2026

ORIGINAL SUIT No.79/2025

Between: A.Chandra Naidu, S/o A.Jayaram Naidu aged 61 years, Business, R/o D.No.1-172 Narigapalle Village and Post, Chittoor Mandal, Chittoor District . . . Plaintiff

And

Bondala Kunta Mangamma, W/o Bondalakunta Chinna Subbarayudu, aged 66 years House Wife and Business, R/o D.No.15/1226 Sanjeeva Nagar, 2nd Road, Tadipatri Anantapur . . . Defendant

APCH010004182025 8

This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery of an amount of Rs.39,98,300/-, due based on suit promissory note, dated, 22-04-2023, executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff, with subsequent interest, and for costs.

Plaint presented on : 22-10-2025 L.R.P. on :-- Plaint filed on: 22-10-2025 Particulars of Valuation :

Principal amount under the promissory noteRs.25,00,000-00

Interest at 24% p.a., from 22-04-2023 to 21-10-2025 on Rs.25,00,000/- Rs. 14,98,300-00

Total : Rs. 39,98,300-00

Court fee paid thereon U/Sec.20 of APCF Act is Rs. 42,426-00

The cause of action for the suit arose on the date of 22.04.2023 the date of borrowing of amount by the defendant by executing the promissory note and depositing the original sale deed by executing the Memorandum of Title deeds in favour of the plaintiff and on various dates of approaches and demands made by the plaintiff for repayment of the amount and on various dates of postponing the same by the defendant and on the date of issuing legal notice to the defendant i.e., on 21.10.2025 and on several dates of demands and continuous de-dfe-in-diem at Narigapalli village and post, Chittoor & District, within the jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court

This suit coming on 28-04-2026 for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Sri V.Lokanadha Reddy, Learned Counsel for the plaintiff, and the defendant is set ex parte, and upon hearing the plaintiff, and on perusing the material on record; the matter having stood over for consideration to this day, this court’s doth order and decree as follows:

:: D E C R E E ::

i) that the suit be and the same is hereby decreed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant for a sum of Rs.39,98,300/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of filing of suit till the date of decree, and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till date of realization on principal amount of Rs.25,00,000/-.

iii) that the defendant do also pay the plaintiff a sum of Rs.1,03,720/- being the costs of the suit.

APCH010004182025 9 Given under my hand and the seal of the Court, on this the 06th day of May, 2026.

Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division)

Chittoor

STATEMENT OF COSTS

S.ParticularsFor PlaintiffFor Defendants No(awarded)

1. Stamp on Vakalat250-00 Exparte

2. Stamp on Plaint42,426-00

3. Stamp on Process120-00

4. Advocate’s Fee60,824-00

5. Typing charges100-00 Total :1,03,720-00

P.C.J (S.D)

Chittoor NOTE : “The parties should apply, as soon as possible, for return of all exhibits which they wish to preserve, as the record will be liable to be destroyed after three years from the date of decree or order.”

APCH010003892025 1

In the Court of the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division) :: Chittoor

Present :Smt M.V.N.Padmaja,

Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Chittoor

Wednesday, this the 06th day of May, 2026

H.M.O.P.No.220/2025

Between :

D.Devi, W/o D.Jaganadha Reddy D/o M.Kuppi Reddy, aged 34 years House wife, R/o Thupalli Village Kalikiri Post, Penumur Mandal Chittoor District, Now R/o Ammagaripalli Village, Chintapenta Post, Penumur Mandal, Chittoor District . . . Petitioner

And

D.Jaganadha Reddy, S/o Late Jayaram Reddy, aged 53 years, Business R/o Thupalli Village, Kalikiri Post Penumuru Mandal, Chittoor District . . . Respondent

This petition coming on 27-04-2026 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri B.Eswar Reddy, Learned Advocate for the petitioner, and the respondent remained ex parte, and upon hearing of the petitioner, and on perusing the material on record, the matter having stood over for consideration to this day, this Court delivered the following:

ORDER

This is a petition filed by the petitioner under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking dissolution of her marriage with the respondent that took place on 31-10-2008 by way of a decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty.

2.The brief averments of the petition are as follows:

On 31-10-2008, the marriage of the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized at Lord Varasiddhi Vinayakaswamy temple, Kanipakam as per the 2

Hindu caste customs and rites, with the consent of the elders and relatives on both sides. After the marriage, they both lived happily for some years, along with the mother of the respondent. Out of their wed lock, they have no issues. The respondent is puppet in the hands of his mother. The respondent used to beat the petitioner indiscriminately in drunken state and harassed her both mentally and physically, and necked out her from the house at several times. The petitioner adjusted with the respondent as a dutiful wife, but he did not choose to provide food to her. The respondent used to quarrel with her without any reasonable cause at the instigation of his mother.

3.Due to unbearable harassment of the respondent and his mother, she left the matrimonial home in the third week of March, 2025 and went to her parents house at Ammagaripalli village. The petitioner got issued a legal notice to the respondent on 03-04-2025, which was received by the respondent, but not replied. The petitioner waited for all these days to lead happy marital life with the respondent, and several mediations were held between them in the presence of village elders and family members, but all were in vain. Hence, the petitioner filed the present petition, seeking dissolution of the marriage dated, 31-10-2008 on the ground of cruelty.

4.On receipt of the notice, the respondent did not file counter even sufficient time has given; hence, treated no counter.

5.Later, to prove the claim, the petitioner herself was examined as P.W.1, and got marked Exs.P1 to P3.

6.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the material on record. Considered the evidence of P.W.1, coupled with Exs.P1 to P3.

3

7.Now the point for consideration is:

“Whether the petitioner is entitled for decree of divorce dissolving her

marriage with the respondent on the ground of cruelty as prayed for”?

POINT:

8.To substantiate the case, the petitioner herself had filed chief examination affidavit in lieu of the chief examination, reiterating all the averments of the petition, and the same was taken on file as evidence in chief of P.W.1. As the respondent did not file counter or cross-examine P.W.1, her evidence remained unchallenged. In view of the fact that the respondent did not turn up with his contentions, an adverse inference has to be drawn against the respondent to the effect that he admitted the entire claim of the petitioner, and that he has nothing to put forward to contest the same. Though the petitioner filed the present petition under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act, as per the entire averments of the petition including the prayer in the petition, the petitioner filed the present petition seeking divorce on the ground of cruelty.

9.Coming to the documentary evidence adduced by the petitioner, i.e.,

Ex.P1-wedding card dated, 31-10-2008; Ex.P2-one marriage photograph with

CD; and Ex.P3-office copy of legal notice dated, 03-04-2025 along with postal receipt coupled with the oral evidence of P.W.1, clinching proved that the marriage of the petitioner with the respondent was solemnized on 31-10-2008.

The documentary evidence manifestly proved that the petitioner and the respondent lived as husband and wife, as stated supra, and the unchallenged evidence of the petitioner proved that the respondent harassed the petitioner both mentally and physically, and the petitioner is living separately without any 4 fault of her, and that the respondent did not receive her back into his conjugal fold, even issuance of Ex.P3-legal notice and even on mediation held by the elders and well-wishers on both sides. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled to the relief claimed as prayed for.

10. In view of unchallenged evidence of P.W.1, coupled with Exs.P1 to P3, this court holds that the petitioner has established that the respondent harassed the petitioner both mentally and physically and deserted her without any sufficient cause. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled to a decree of divorce dissolving her marriage with the respondent on the ground as prayed by her.

Accordingly, this point is answered in favour of the petitioner.

In the result, this petition is allowed dissolving the marriage that took place on 31-10-2008 between the petitioner and the respondent by way of a decree of divorce. No order as to costs.

Dictated to Stenographer Gr-II, transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by me in the

open court, on this the 06th day of May, 2026

Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division)

Chittoor

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Petitioner: For Respondent:

PW.1 : D.Devi Nil

DOCUMENTS MARKED

For Petitioner:

Ex.P1 : Copy of marriage wedding card dated, 31-10-2008 Ex.P2 : One marriage photograph with CD Ex.P3 : Office copy of legal notice dated, 03-04-2025 issued by petitioner along with postal receipt

For Respondent:

Nil

PCJ (S.D.)

Chittoor 5

In the Court of the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division) :: Chittoor

Present :Smt M.V.N.Padmaja,

Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Chittoor

Wednesday, this the 06th day of May, 2026

H.M.O.P.No.220/2025

Between :

D.Devi, W/o D.Jaganadha Reddy D/o M.Kuppi Reddy, aged 34 years House wife, R/o Thupalli Village Kalikiri Post, Penumur Mandal Chittoor District, Now R/o Ammagaripalli Village, Chintapenta Post, Penumur Mandal, Chittoor District . . . Petitioner

And

D.Jaganadha Reddy, S/o Late Jayaram Reddy, aged 53 years, Business R/o Thupalli Village, Kalikiri Post Penumuru Mandal, Chittoor District . . . Respondent

This is a petition filed by the petitioner under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking dissolution of her marriage with the respondent that took place on 31-10-2008 by way of a decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty.

The cause of action for the petition arose on 31-10-2008 the petitioner and respondent got marriage at Lord Vara Siddi Vinayaka Temple, Kanipakam, Irala mandal, Chittoor District as per Hindu rights and customs. In March 3rd week - 2025 and joined her parents house at Ammagaripalli Village of Penumuru Mandal and on 03-04-2025 when the petitioner issued Registered Legal Norice to the respondent and continuous de-die-in-diem at Thupalli Village, Kalikiri Post Penumuru Mandal, Chittoor District, A.P where the petitioner and respondent last resided within the jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court.

A Court Fee of Rs.10/- is paid under Schedule II, Art.1(vii) of A.P.C.F & S.V.Act, 1956.

6

Petition presented on : 17-09-2025 Petition LRP on : -- Petition filed on : 26-09-2025

This petition coming on 27-04-2026 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri B.Eswar Reddy, Learned Advocate for the petitioner, and the respondent remained ex parte, and upon hearing of the petitioner, and on perusing the material on record, the matter having stood over for consideration to this day, this Court’s doth Order and Decree as follows :-

DECREE

i) That the petition be and the same is hereby allowed dissolving the marriage that took place on 31-10-2008 between the petitioner and the respondent by way of a decree of divorce.

ii) that there be no order as to costs.

Given under my hand and the seal of this Court, this, the 06 th day of May, 2026.

Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division)

Chittoor

STATEMENT OF COSTS

NIL

PCJ(Sr.Div.) Chittoor 7

Decree in

H.M.O.P.No. 220/2025

dt. 06-05-2026.

8

Fair Order in

H.M.O.P.No.200/2019

dt.25.06.2025.

APCH010000962026

In the Court of the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division) :: Chittoor

Present : Smt.M.V.N.Padmaja,

Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Chittoor

Thursday, this the 7th day of May, 2026

H.M.O.P.No.56/2026

Between:

1. O.M.Lohitha, W/o O.M.Surya Prakash D/o K.Madhu Mohan, aged 31 years House Wife, R/o D.No.30-121/48 Vijaya Lakshmi Colony, Surendra Garden BSR Nagar, Mangasamudram Village, Chittoor

2. O.M.Surya Prakash, S/o O.M.Ravi aged 40 years, Retired Army, R/o D.No.30-121/48 Vijaya Lakshmi Colony, Surendra Garden BSR Nagar, Mangasamudram Village, Chittoor . . . Petitioners

And

Nil . . . Respondent

This petition coming on 07-05-2026 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri M.Chandrasekhar, Learned Advocate for the petitioners, and the respondent is shown as nil, and upon hearing the petitioners, and on perusing the material on record, the matter having stood over for consideration to this day, this Court delivered the following:

ORDER

This petition is filed by petitioners 1 and 2 under Section 13-B of the Hindu

Marriage Act, 1955, seeking dissolution of their marriage by way of granting divorce on mutual consent.

2.The brief averments of the petition are as follows :

On 18-07-2012, the marriage of the petitioners was solemnized at TTD Kalyana

Mandapam, Vasanthapuram, Naraharipet, Gudipala Mandal, Chittoor District, as per the Hindu caste customs and rites. Out of their wed lock, they blessed with two 2 male issues, namely Sri Charan born on 03-06-2013 and Mokshith, born on 22-03- 2016, who are under the care and custody of the 2nd petitioner at present.

3.Due to disputes between the petitioners, they could not lead happy marital life. Several mediations were held between the petitioners and failed. The petitioners are living separately since 20-05-2023.On the advise of the elders, the petitioners decided to take divorce through a court of law on mutual consent, as there is no hope for their reunion. As per the settlement of terms, the 2nd petitioner agreed to pay an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- to the 1st petitioner towards permanent alimony. Both the petitioners agreed to exchange their gold ornaments. Hence, the petition.

4.Having registered the case on 18-03-2026, it was taken on file and adjourned the petition to 21-09-2026 for the appearance of both parties for compliance of the statutory period of six months as envisaged under Section 13-B of the Hindu

Marriage Act, 1955.

5.On 07-05-2026, both parties present and filed an application in

I.A.No.177/2026 under Rule 109 (2) of Civil Rules of Practice, seeking to advance the matter from 21-09-2026. The said petition was allowed advancing the main petition to today i.e., 07-05-2026. This Court tried for reconciliation in compliance of

Section 23(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act. But it is not fruitful as they adhered to take divorce.

6.Both parties also filed an application in I.A.No.178/2025, seeking to dispense with the statutory period of Six months for passing of decree for dissolution of their marriage dated, 18-07-2012 by way of divorce on mutual consent under Section 13(B) (2) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The said petition is allowed as per the 3 decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.11158/2017 between

Amardeep Singh Vs. Harveen Kour and Ors., waiving the statutory locking period for the grant of decree of divorce on the ground of mutual consent.

7.During the enquiry, the petitioners themselves examined as P.Ws.1 and 2, respectively, and got marked Exs.P1 and P2.

8.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. Perused the record.

Considered both submissions.

9. Now the point for consideration is:

“Whether the petitioners are entitled for dissolution of their marriage by way

of decree of divorce on mutual consent as prayed for?”

POINT:

10.In order to prove the case of petitioners, they have filed their respective chief examination affidavits in lieu of the chief examination, reiterating all the averments of the petition, and the same were taken on file as evidence in chief of P.Ws.1 and

2. P.W.1 got marked copy of wedding card, dated, 18-07-2012; and one marriage photograph along with D.V.D.

11. As per the evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2, their marriage was performed on 18-07-2012 at TTD Kalyana Mandapam, Vasanthapuram, Naraharipet, Gudipala

Mandal, Chittoor District, as per the Hindu caste customs and rites, and out of their wed lock, they blessed with two male issues, who are under the care and custody of the 2nd petitioner at present. Further, due to disputes between the petitioners, they could not lead happy marital life, and that several mediations were held between the petitioners and failed, and that the petitioners are living separately since 20-05-2023. Further, on the advise of the elders, the petitioners decided to 4 take divorce through a court of law on mutual consent, as there is no hope for their reunion. Further, as per the settlement of terms, the 2nd petitioner agreed to pay an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- to the 1st petitioner towards permanent alimony, and that both the petitioners agreed to exchange their gold ornaments. The above- mentioned settlement between P.Ws.1 and 2 shows that they have settled their disputes out of the Court and decided to take divorce, as there is no scope for their reunion. In the said circumstances, this court is of the considered opinion that this is a fit case to grant a decree of divorce as prayed by the petitioners. Accordingly, the point is answered.

In the result, this petition is allowed by dissolving the marriage that took place on 18-07-2012 between the petitioners by way of a decree of divorce on mutual consent under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and the petitioners shall bear their own costs.

Typed to my edication to the Typist directly, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court, on this the 07th day of May, 2026.

Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division)

Chittoor

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Petitioners : For Respondent :

PW.1 : O.M.Lohitha None PW.2 : O.M.Surya Prakash

DOCUMENTS MARKED

For Petitioners :

Ex.P1 : Copy of wedding card dated, 18-07-2012 Ex.P2 : One marriage photograph with D.V.D.

For Respondent :

Nil 5

PCJ (S.D.)

Chittoor

Draft Order in

H.M.O.P.No.46/2025

6

In the Court of the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division) :: Chittoor

Present : Smt.M.V.N.Padmaja,

Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Chittoor

Thursday, this the 7th day of May, 2026

H.M.O.P.No.56/2026

Between:

1. O.M.Lohitha, W/o O.M.Surya Prakash D/o K.Madhu Mohan, aged 31 years House Wife, R/o D.No.30-121/48 Vijaya Lakshmi Colony, Surendra Garden BSR Nagar, Mangasamudram Village, Chittoor

2. O.M.Surya Prakash, S/o O.M.Ravi aged 40 years, Retired Army, R/o D.No.30-121/48 Vijaya Lakshmi Colony, Surendra Garden BSR Nagar, Mangasamudram Village, Chittoor . . . Petitioners

And

Nil . . . Respondent

This petition is filed by petitioners 1 and 2 under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking dissolution of their marriage by way of granting divorce on mutual consent.

Cause of Action for the above petition arose on 18.07.2012 at T.T.D. Kalyana Mandapam, Vasanthapuram, Naraharipeta, Gudipala mandal, Chittoor District and from the day one of marriage the petitioners could not cope up the family life and the disputes crop up and the marriage was irretrievably broken down and at the instance elders several mediations held, lastly the petitioners stayed at the village of Mangasamudram Village, Chittoor District., within the jurisdiction of this Hon'ble court.

A Court Fee of Rs.10/- is paid under Article VII, Sechedule.II of A.P.C.F & S.V.Act, 1956.

Petition presented on : 24-02-2026 L.R.P. on: 13-03-2026 Petition filed on : 18-03-2026

This petition coming on 07-05-2026 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri M.Chandrasekhar, Learned Advocate for the petitioners, and the respondent is shown as nil, and upon hearing the petitioners, and on perusing the material on record, the matter 7 having stood over for consideration to this day, this Court, doth Order and Decree as follows:-

DECREE

i) that the petition be and the same is hereby allowed, dissolving the marriage that took place on 18-07-2012 between the petitioners by way of a decree of divorce on mutual consent under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

ii) that the petitioners 1 and 2 shall bear their own costs.

Given under my hand and the seal of this Court, this, the 07 th day of May, 2026.

Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Chittoor.

STATEMENT OF COSTS

Costs Memo not filed. Hence, not certified.

Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Chittoor.

Decree in

H.M.O.P.No.56/2026

dt.07-05-2026.

8

APCH010000852026

In the Court of the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division) :: Chittoor

Present:Smt.M.V.N.Padmaja,

Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Chittoor

Friday, this the 8th day of May, 2026

H.M.O.P.No.53/2026

Between:

E.Bhanu, W/o A.Rohith, D/o E.Sriramulu aged 34 years, House wife, R/o P.Gollapalli Village, Polakala Post, Irala Mandal Chittoor District . . . Petitioner

And

A.Rohith, S/o A.Bhakar Naidu, aged 38 years Private Employee, R/o Iruvarampalli Village Nampalli Post, Irala Mandal, Chittoor District . . . Respondent

This petition coming on 05-05-2026 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri T.Mohan, Learned Advocate for the petitioner, and Sri K.Murali, Learned Advocate for the respondent, and upon hearing both sides, and on perusing the material on record, the matter having stood over for consideration to this day, this Court delivered the following:

ORDER

This is a petition filed by the petitioner under Section 13(1) (ia), (1b) of the

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, to dissolve her marriage performed with the respondent on 17-08-2017 by way of decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion.

2.The brief averments of the petition are as follows:

On 17-08-2017, the marriage of the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized at Sri Subrahmanyaswamy Temple, Sadum, Chittoor district, as per the Hindu caste customs and rites. The petitioner’s parents spent the entire marriage expenses of

Rs.2,00,000/-, and also presented 12 sovereigns of gold ornaments to the 2 petitioner, and 3 sovereigns of gold ornaments to the respondent, and also presented house hold articles worth of Rs.2,00,000/-.

3.After the marriage, the petitioner joined with the respondent at her matrimonial home, and they both lived together for 3 months. Thereafter, the respondent started harassing the petitioner at the instigation of her mother demanding to bring additional dowry. The petitioner explained her parents inability to give additional dowry. The respondent used to beat her indiscriminately. The petitioner came to know that the respondent is having bad vices, and he used to come to the house in drunken state, and used to harass the petitioner. In spite of several requests made by the petitioner, the respondent did not choose to change his attitude.

4.The respondent did not take care of the petitioner during her pregnancy and he did not provide proper food to her and not provided proper medical care to her.

The petitioner did not inform to her parents with a hope that the respondent will change his attitude and he will take care of her, but all her hopes were in vain. On 05-06-2018, the respondent necked out the petitioner from his house at the active instigation of his family members by threatening with dire-consequences, as she failed to comply his illegal demands. Having no other option, she went to her parents house and informed to her parents about the harassment of the respondent towards her.

5.The petitioner’s father died due to heart attack on 11-12-2018. Meantime, the petitioner gave birth to a female issue on 28-09-2018. Her family members spent the entire delivery expenses. Though intimated to the respondent and his family 3 members, they did not choose to see the petitioner or born baby. Several mediations were held by the petitioners for their reunion, but all were in vain. The respondent demanded additional dowry in all mediations as otherwise, he will not take back the petitioner into his conjugal fold. Her mother is not in a position to provide dowry; hence, the petitioner stayed at her parents house.

6.The petitioner waited for all these days with a fond hope that the respondent will change his attitude and he will take her back into his conjugal fold and he will provide all amenities to her and her child, but all hopes were in vain. Having no other go, the petitioner filed the present petition seeking dissolution of the marriage dated, 17-08-2017 on the grounds of cruelty and desertion.

7.When the matter came for appearance, both the parties requested this court to refer the matter to mediation center. On the request of the both parties, the matter was referred to mediation center on 16-04-2026. This court received the mediation report as per office note dated, 05-05-2026 settling the matter in the following terms:

1.The petitioner and the respondent are withdrawing the allegations made in the petition and counter. The petitioner and the respondent have agreed to dissolve their marriage performed on 17-08-2017 according to the Hindu rites and customs in Sri Subrahmanya Swamy Temple, Sadum Village and Mandal, Chittoor Town and District by way of decree of divorce by exercising their free will and consent.

2. The petitioner and the respondent agreed to lead their lives independently and one shall not interfere with other’s life from the date of decree.

3. The respondent herein agreed not to interfere with the life of child by the name A.Lohitha, aged about 08 years, and child will lead her life with the petitioner.

4

4. The petitioner and the respondent shall not file any civil and criminal cases against each other and their respective family members in future.

5. The petitioner herein waived her right of maintenance.

8.On 05-05-2025, both parties are present before the court. Heard both sides.

Perused the record. The terms of settlement are read over and explained to both parties in Telugu, for which, they agreed voluntarily that the terms of settlement are true and correct.

9.On careful perusal of terms of settlement arrived between the petitioner and the respondent before the mediator, it is evident that both the parties agreed to dissolve their marriage. Both parties have conceded to the terms of settlement arrived before the mediator. Thus, the matter is settled in terms of the settlement between the parties recorded by the mediator, and the present petition shall be allowed in terms of the settlement.

In the result, this petition is allowed dissolving the marriage that took place on 17-08-2017 between the petitioner and the respondent by way of a decree of divorce. No order as to costs.

Dictated to the Stenographer Gr-II, transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by me in

the open court, on this the 8th day of May, 2026.

Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division)

Chittoor

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Nil

PCJ (S.D.)

Chittoor 5 6

Fair Order in

HMOP.No.107/2021

Dt: 04-08-2025

APCH010004172025

In the Court of the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division) :: Chittoor

Present : Smt.M.V.N.Padmaja,

Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Chittoor.

Friday, this the Eighth (08th) day of May, 2026

E.P.No. 40/ 2025 in O.S.No.17/ 2015

Between:

1. R.Alli Kumar (Died)

2. R.Amudha, W/o Late Ali Kumar, aged 46 years

3. R.Naveen Kumar. S/o Late R.Ali Kumar, aged 30 years

4. P.Bharathi, W/o. P.Surendra Babu, aged 26 years

5. R.Lakshmi, W/o Late R.Ramaswami, aged 74 years Petitioners 2 to 5 are R/at P.B.Agraharam village Velkuru post, G.D. Nellore Mandal, Chittoor District No.s 2 to 5 are added as per orders in Ι.Α.Νο.174/2021

Dt: 02-12-2021) ….Decree holders

And

1. T.Mallishwari, W/o late. T.Rambabu, aged 56 years

2. T.Vijaya Kumar, S/o. Late T.Ramababu, aged 31 years

3. T.Kishore, S/o Late T.Rambabu, aged 27 years All are residing at D.No.8-52, NTR Colony Ellamarajupalli Post, near Tana, G.D.Nellore Mandal Chittoor District …..Judgment Debtors

This E.P. is filed by the Decree Holder under order 21 Rules 64 and 66 of CPC ; seeking to order sale attachment of the E.P schedule property for due realization of the E.P amount. This petition came before me on 08.05.2026 for hearing in the presence of Sri P.V.Asrithavatsalu, Advocate for Decree Holder and Sri.N.Saravanakumar, Advocate for J.Dr No.1 and the J.Drs 2 and 3 are remained exparte and this Court made the following:-

O R D E R

Full satisfaction memo filed by the Decree holders. Heard and memo recorded.

E.P is terminated.

Pronounced by me in the open court, on this the 08th day of May, 2026.

2

Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division)

Chittoor