Currently Serving

Sri. P.B. Kiran Kumar

Senior Civil Judge Karimnagar

Huzurabad, SCJ Court Complex · Karimnagar · Telangana

Sri. P.B. Kiran Kumar, Senior Civil Judge Karimnagar, is posted at Huzurabad, SCJ Court Complex, Karimnagar, Telangana, India. 536 court orders on record since 2024. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles H, OS, EP cases.

536

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

H.M.O.P/125/2025

Anuri alias Paindla Udaya Sri alias Kavya Sri vs Anuri Pradeep

05 May 2026

HMOP.NO. 125 OF 2025

1 of 5

IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE CUM ASSISTANT

SESSIONS JUDGE, HUZURABAD

Present:-Sri P. B. KIRAN KUMAR,

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Asst. Sessions Judge,

HUZURABAD

Tuesday, this the 5th day of May, 2026

HMOP No. 125 of 2025

Between :- Anuri @ Paindla Udaya Sri @ Kavya Sri, w/o Anuri Pradeep, age: 30 yrs, occ: Housewife, r/o H.no. 4-86, Duddenapalli village of Saidapur mandal of Karimnagar district. Presently residing at her parents house D/o Paindla Ramesh H.no. B-195, Jagtial town and district. …Petitioner No.1

AND

Anuri Pradeep, s/o Sadanandam, age: 32 yrs, occ: Private employee, R/o H.No. 4-86, Duddenapalli village of Saidapur mandal of Karimnagar district.

...Petitioner No.2

This petition is coming before me for final hearing and disposal in the presence of Sri Kamani Sammaiah and Sri K.Rajendram, learned counsels

for petitioners and the petition having stood over for consideration till this day,

this Court made the following:-

:: ORDER ::

Initially, this petition was filed by the petitioner No.1/wife against the petitioner No.2/respondent/husband under Section 13 (1) (ia) (ib) of Hindu

Marriage Act and later the same was amended to 13-B of Hindu marriage act, 1955, praying this court to dissolve their marriage dated 28.01.2023 and to grant decree of divorce by mutual consent.

HMOP.NO. 125 OF 2025

2 of 5

2.The case of the petitioners in brief is that the petitioner No.1 is the legally wedded wife of the petitioner No.2. Their marriage was solemnized on 28.01.2023 at the petitioner’s grandmother’s house in Ellampalli village, Parkal mandal, Hanumakonda district, as per the Hindu Customs and Traditions prevailing in their community.

2.1.After the marriage, the petitioners lived happily for a period of one year only. Their marriage was consummated and one son born to them.

Thereafter disputes and differences arose between the petitioners and the petitioner No.1 left the society of petitioner No.2 on 10.09.2024 and went to her parents’ house. In the meanwhile, several panchayaths were conducted in between them and they were not fruitful. As such, they have not been able to live together and in future there is no hope of any reconciliation or re-union in between the petitioners. Therefore, the petitioners are agreed that their marriage should be got dissolved through court of law on mutual consent.

2.2.The petitioners are already exchanged their belongings, gold and silver ornaments, clothes and articles of each other and nothing is left over to be exchanged. The petitioner No.1 and 2 agreed to withdraw all civil and criminal cases against each other. It is therefore necessary in the interest of both the petitioners that the marriage between them be dissolved by a decree of divorce, so that they may be able to lead their lives independently and re-

HMOP.NO. 125 OF 2025

3 of 5 marry if they so desire of their own choice. Hence, this petition for grant of divorce on mutual consent.

3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.

4.Originally, the petitioner No.1 filed the petition U/sec. 13(1) (ia)(ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, against the petitioner No.2/respondent. Subsequently, the petitioner filed petition under order VI Rule 17 of CPC praying this court to amend the petition and after hearing both sides, the petition was allowed and this petition was amended to Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 as per the orders passed in IA.No.242 of 2026, dt: 04.05.2026. During pendency of the case, both petitioners have filed an interlocutory Application U/sec. 13-B(2) of Hindu Marriage Act to waive off the cooling period of six months and the same was allowed by this court vide IA.No. 266 of 2026 dt: 04.05.2025.

5.The point that arises for consideration in this petition is:-

“Whether petitioners 1 & 2 are entitled to take divorce by way of

mutual consent as per Section 13 (B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, as

prayed for or not?

6.The Petitioner No.1 is examined as PW-1 and petitioner No.2 is examined as Pw.2, in support of their case and marked Exs.P1 and Ex.P2 through Pw1 on their behalf.

7. POINT:As per the contentions submitted by both the petitioners, it is an admitted fact that both petitioners got married with each

HMOP.NO. 125 OF 2025

4 of 5 other on 28.01.2023 at Ellampalli village, Parkal mandal, Hanumakonda district, as per Hindu rites and customs, but on 10.07.2024, the petitioner No.1 left the society of the petitioner No.2 and since then she has been residing with her parent’s house and as such, it can be said that the petitioner No.1 & 2 cannot reside as wife and husband under one roof and further continuation of marriage in between them amounts to mental agony to both of them. Hence, on elders advice, both petitioners decided to obtain divorce by way of mutual consent. The petitioners are already entered into mutual agreement by way of compromise.

8.During pendency of proceedings, both petitioners had reiterated the entire contents of the petition in their chief affidavits as P.Ws.1 & 2 who voluntarily deposed that they intend to take divorce by mutual consent itself reflects that their marriage is irretrievably broken down and there is no chance for their reunion though this court had conducted reconciliation between petitioners which turned futile. Since there is no possibility of reunion of petitioner Nos.1 & 2 and as nothing is on record to show that this petition is filed out of coercion or threat and the petitioners have also not withdrawn their consent during pendency of the petition, this Court is of the considered opinion that all the essential ingredients for grant of divorce on mutual consent are satisfied in this case. Hence, the point is answered holding that petitioners are entitled to decree of divorce on mutual consent.

HMOP.NO. 125 OF 2025

5 of 5

9.In the result, the petition is allowed. The marriage dated 28.01.2023 in between Petitioner No.1/Anuri @ Paindla Udaya Sri @ Kavya Sri and Petitioner No.2/Anuri Pradeep, is dissolved from today by passing decree of divorce on mutual consent of the petitioners. No costs.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 5th day of May, 2026.

Sd/-

Senior Civil Judge-cum-,

Asst. Sessions Judge, Huzurabad

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR THE PETITIONERS

P.W.1: Anuri @ Paindla Udaya Sri @ Kavya Sri P.W.2: Anuri Pradeep

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR THE PETITIONERS:

Ex.P1: Original Wedding card Ex.P2: Original Marriage photograph

Sd/-

Senior Civil Judge-cum-,

Asst. Sessions Judge, Huzurabad

H.M.O.P/62/2026

Bollaveni Radhika alias Neduru Radhika vs None

05 May 2026

HMOP.NO. 62 OF 2026

1 of 5

IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE CUM ASSISTANT

SESSIONS JUDGE, HUZURABAD

Present:-Sri P. B. KIRAN KUMAR,

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Asst. Sessions Judge,

HUZURABAD

Tuesday, this the 5th day of May, 2026

HMOP No. 62 of 2026

Between :- Bollaveni Radhika @ Neduru Radhika w/o Srikanth, age: 30 yrs, occ: House hold, r/o Jammikunta village and mandal of Karimnagar district. Now presently residing at her parents house D/o Neduru Eshwaraiah, at Jammikunta village and mandal of Karimnagar district.

…Petitioner No.1

AND

Bollaveni Srikanth s/o Chandraiah, age: 37 yrs, occ: Coolie, R/o Jammikunta village and mandal of Karimnagar district.

...Petitioner No.2

This petition is coming before me for final hearing and disposal in the presence of Sri Vemula Madhavi, learned counsel for petitioners and the petition having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court made the following:-

:: ORDER ::

This petition is filed by petitioner Nos.1 & 2 under Section 13-B of the

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, praying this court to dissolve their marriage dated 21.06.2018 and to grant decree of divorce by mutual consent.

2.The case of the petitioners in brief is that the petitioner No.1 is the legally wedded wife of the petitioner No.2. Their marriage was solemnized on

HMOP.NO. 62 OF 2026

2 of 5 21.06.2018 at Seetha Rama Chandraswamy Temple at Ellandakunta village of

Jammikunta mandal of Karimnagar district, as per the Hindu Customs and

Traditions prevailing in their community.

2.1.After the marriage, the petitioners lived happily for 2 years only. During their wedlock no issues were born to them. Thereafter, some disputes and differences arose in between them and the petitioner No.1 left the society of petitioner No.1 on 19.01.2020 and went to her parents’ house. In the mean while several panchayaths were conducted in between the petitioners and they were not fruitful. As such, they have not been able to live together and in future there is no hope of any reconciliation or re-union between the petitioners. Therefore, the petitioners are agreed that their marriage should be got dissolved through court of law on mutual consent.

2.2. The petitioner No.2 agreed to pay an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- for her future maintenance and permanent alimony at the time of decree of divorce.

The petitioners are already exchanged their belongings, gold and silver ornaments, clothes and articles of each other and nothing is left over to be exchanged. It is therefore necessary in the interest of both the petitioners that the marriage between them be dissolved by a decree of divorce, so that they may be able to lead their lives independently and re-marry if they so desire of their own choice. Hence, this petition for grant of divorce on mutual consent.

3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.

HMOP.NO. 62 OF 2026

3 of 5

4.The point that arises for consideration in this petition is:-

“Whether petitioners 1 & 2 are entitled to take divorce by way of

mutual consent as per Section 13 (B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, as

prayed for or not?

5.The Petitioner No.1 is examined as PW-1 and petitioner No.2 is examined as Pw.2, in support of their case and marked Exs.P1 to Ex.P4 through Pw1 on their behalf.

6. POINT:As per the contentions submitted by both the petitioners, it is an admitted fact that both petitioners got married with each other on 21.06.2018 at Seetha Rama Chandraswamy Temple at Ellandakunta village of Jammikunta mandal of Karimnagar district, as per Hindu rites and customs, but on 19.01.2020, the petitioner No.1 left the society of the petitioner No.2 and since then she has been residing with her parent’s house and as such, it can be said that the petitioner No.1 & 2 cannot reside as wife and husband under one roof and further continuation of marriage in between them amounts to mental agony to both of them. Hence, on elders advice, both petitioners decided to obtain divorce by way of mutual consent. The petitioners are already entered into mutual agreement by way of compromise.

During pendency of the case, both petitioners have filed an interlocutory

Application U/sec. 13-B(2) of Hindu Marriage Act to waive off the cooling period of six months and the same was allowed by this court vide IA.No. 265 of 2026 dt: 04.05.2026.

HMOP.NO. 62 OF 2026

4 of 5

7.During pendency of proceedings, both petitioners had reiterated the entire contents of the petition in their chief affidavits as P.Ws.1 & 2 who voluntarily deposed that they intend to take divorce by mutual consent itself reflects that their marriage is irretrievably broken down and there is no chance for their reunion though this court had conducted reconciliation between petitioners which turned futile. Since there is no possibility of reunion of petitioner Nos.1 & 2 and as nothing is on record to show that this petition is filed out of coercion or threat and the petitioners have also not withdrawn their consent during pendency of the petition, this Court is of the considered opinion that all the essential ingredients for grant of divorce on mutual consent are satisfied in this case. Hence, the point is answered holding that petitioners are entitled to decree of divorce on mutual consent.

8.In the result, the petition is allowed. The marriage dated 21.06.2018 in between Petitioner No.1/Bollaveni Radhika @ Neduru Radhika and Petitioner

No.2/Bollaveni Srikanth, is dissolved from today by passing decree of divorce on mutual consent of the petitioners. No costs.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 5th day of May, 2026.

Sd/-

Senior Civil Judge-cum-,

Asst. Sessions Judge, Huzurabad

HMOP.NO. 62 OF 2026

5 of 5

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR THE PETITIONERS

P.W.1: Bollaveni Radhika @ Neduru Radhika P.W.2: Bollaveni Srikanth

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR THE PETITIONERS:

Ex.P1: Original Wedding card Ex.P2: Joint photograph Ex.P3: Original Marriage Certificate dated 19.07.2018 Ex.P4: Original divorce deed, dated 11.01.2023

Sd/-

Senior Civil Judge-cum-,

Asst. Sessions Judge, Huzurabad.

H.M.O.P/44/2026

Deshetty Sandhya Rani vs None

06 May 2026

HMOP.NO. 44 OF 2026

1 of 4

IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE CUM ASSISTANT

SESSIONS JUDGE, HUZURABAD

Present:-Sri P. B. KIRAN KUMAR,

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Asst. Sessions Judge,

HUZURABAD

Wednesday, this the 6th day of May, 2026

HMOP No. 44 of 2026

Between :- Deshetty Sandhya Rani w/o Deshetty Srinivas D/o Kumaraswamy, age: 28 yrs, occ: Housewife, r/o Garmillapelly village of Tekumatla mandal.

…Petitioner No.1

AND

Deshetty Srinivas s/o Sarangapani, age: 34 yrs, occ: Coolie, R/o H.No. 2-64, Vavilala village of Jammikunta mandal.

...Petitioner No.2

This petition is coming before me for final hearing and disposal in the presence of Smt. A.Sukanya, learned counsel for petitioner No.1 and Sri P.Sridhar Babu, learned counsel for petitioner No.2 and the petition having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court made the following:-

:: ORDER ::

This petition is filed by petitioner Nos.1 & 2 under Section 13-B of the

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, praying this court to dissolve their marriage dated 22.11.2019 and to grant decree of divorce by mutual consent.

2.The case of the petitioners in brief is that the petitioner No.1 is the legally wedded wife of the petitioner No.2. Their marriage was solemnized on 22.11.2019 at the house of petitioner NO.1 at Garmillapelly village, as per the

Hindu Customs and Traditions prevailing in their community.

HMOP.NO. 44 OF 2026

2 of 4 2.1.After the marriage, the petitioners lived happily for some period only.

During their wedlock no issues were born to them. Thereafter, some disputes and differences arose in between them and the petitioner No.1 left the society of petitioner No.2 on 10.05.2022 and went to her parents’ house. In the mean while several panchayaths were conducted in between the petitioners and they were not fruitful. As such, they have not been able to live together and in future there is no hope of any reconciliation or re-union between the petitioners. Therefore, the petitioners are agreed that their marriage should be got dissolved through court of law on mutual consent.

2.2. The petitioner No.2 agreed to pay an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- for her future maintenance and permanent alimony at the time of decree of divorce.

3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.

4.The point that arises for consideration in this petition is:-

“Whether petitioners 1 & 2 are entitled to take divorce by way of

mutual consent as per Section 13 (B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, as

prayed for or not?

HMOP.NO. 44 OF 2026

3 of 4

5.The Petitioner No.1 is examined as PW-1 and petitioner No.2 is examined as Pw.2, in support of their case and marked Exs.P1 and Ex.P2 through Pw1 on their behalf.

6. POINT:As per the contentions submitted by both the petitioners, it is an admitted fact that both petitioners got married with each other on 22.11.2019 at the house of petitioner NO.1 at Garmillapelly village, as per Hindu rites and customs, but on 10.05.2022, the petitioner No.1 left the society of the petitioner No.2 and since then she has been residing with her parent’s house and as such, it can be said that the petitioner No.1 & 2 cannot reside as wife and husband under one roof and further continuation of marriage in between them amounts to mental agony to both of them. Hence, on elders advice, both petitioners decided to obtain divorce by way of mutual consent. The petitioners are already entered into mutual agreement by way of compromise. During pendency of the case, both petitioners have filed an interlocutory Application U/sec. 13-B(2) of Hindu Marriage Act to waive off the cooling period of six months and the same was allowed by this court vide

IA.No.274 of 2026 dt: 05.05.2026.

HMOP.NO. 44 OF 2026

4 of 4 petitioners which turned futile. Since there is no possibility of reunion of petitioner Nos.1 & 2 and as nothing is on record to show that this petition is filed out of coercion or threat and the petitioners have also not withdrawn their consent during pendency of the petition, this Court is of the considered opinion that all the essential ingredients for grant of divorce on mutual consent are satisfied in this case. Hence, the point is answered holding that petitioners are entitled to decree of divorce on mutual consent.

8.In the result, the petition is allowed. The marriage dated 22.11.2019 in between Petitioner No.1/ Deshetty Sandhya Rani and Petitioner No.2/ Deshetty

Srinivas, is dissolved from today by passing decree of divorce on mutual consent of the petitioners. No costs.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 6th day of May, 2026.

Sd/-

Senior Civil Judge-cum-,

Asst. Sessions Judge, Huzurabad

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR THE PETITIONERS

P.W.1: Deshetty Sandhya Rani P.W.2: Deshetty Srinivas

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR THE PETITIONERS:

Ex.P1: Original Wedding card Ex.P2: Original Marriage photograph

Sd/-

Senior Civil Judge-cum-,

Asst. Sessions Judge, Huzurabad.

H.M.O.P/15/2026

Nagandla alias Parakala Ravalika vs None

06 May 2026

HMOP.NO. 15 OF 2026

1 of 5

IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE CUM ASSISTANT

SESSIONS JUDGE, HUZURABAD

Present:-Sri P. B. KIRAN KUMAR,

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Asst. Sessions Judge,

HUZURABAD

Wednesday, this the 6th day of May, 2026

HMOP No. 15 of 2026

Between :- Nagandla @ Parakala Ravalika, w/o Aravind, d/o Thirupathi, age: 26 yrs, occ: House wife, r/o Lingapoor village of Shankarapatnam mandal of Karimnagar district.

…Petitioner No.1

AND

Parakala Aravind s/o Mallaiah, age: 27 yrs, occ: Nil, r/o Lingapoor village of Shankarapatnam mandal of Karimnagar district.

...Petitioner No.2

This petition is coming before me for final hearing and disposal in the presence of Sri M.Rajamouli, learned counsel for petitioners and the petition having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court made the following:-

:: ORDER ::

This petition is filed by petitioner Nos.1 & 2 under Section 13-B of the

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, praying this court to dissolve their marriage dated 24.11.2021 and to grant decree of divorce by mutual consent.

2.The case of the petitioners in brief is that the petitioner No.1 is the legally wedded wife of the petitioner No.2. Their marriage was solemnized on 24.11.2021 at Lingapoor (Erukalagudem) village of Shankarapatnam mandal of

HMOP.NO. 15 OF 2026

2 of 5

Karimnagar district, as per the Hindu Customs and Traditions prevailing in their community.

2.1.After the marriage, the petitioners lived happily for 1 year only. During their wedlock no issues were born to them. Thereafter, some disputes and differences arose in between them and the petitioner No.1 left the society of petitioner No.2 on 29.04.2022 and went to her parents’ house. In the mean while several panchayaths were conducted in between the petitioners and they were not fruitful. As such, they have not been able to live together and in future there is no hope of any reconciliation or re-union between the petitioners. Therefore, the petitioners are agreed that their marriage should be got dissolved through court of law on mutual consent.

2.2. The petitioner No.2 agreed to pay an amount of Rs.3,20,000/- for her future maintenance and permanent alimony at the time of decree of divorce.

3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.

4.The point that arises for consideration in this petition is:-

HMOP.NO. 15 OF 2026

3 of 5

“Whether petitioners 1 & 2 are entitled to take divorce by way of

mutual consent as per Section 13 (B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, as

prayed for or not?

5.The Petitioner No.1 is examined as PW-1 and petitioner No.2 is examined as Pw.2, in support of their case and marked Exs.P1 and Ex.P2 through Pw1 on their behalf.

6. POINT:As per the contentions submitted by both the petitioners, it is an admitted fact that both petitioners got married with each other on 24.11.2021 at Lingapoor (Erukalagudem) village of Shankarapatnam mandal of Karimnagar district, as per Hindu rites and customs, but on 29.04.2022, the petitioner No.1 left the society of the petitioner No.2 and since then she has been residing with her parent’s house and as such, it can be said that the petitioner No.1 & 2 cannot reside as wife and husband under one roof and further continuation of marriage in between them amounts to mental agony to both of them. Hence, on elders advice, both petitioners decided to obtain divorce by way of mutual consent. The petitioners are already entered into mutual agreement by way of compromise. During pendency of the case, both petitioners have filed an interlocutory Application U/sec. 13-B(2) of Hindu

Marriage Act to waive off the cooling period of six months and the same was allowed by this court vide IA.No. 269 of 2026 dt: 04.05.2026.

HMOP.NO. 15 OF 2026

4 of 5 reflects that their marriage is irretrievably broken down and there is no chance for their reunion though this court had conducted reconciliation between petitioners which turned futile. Since there is no possibility of reunion of petitioner Nos.1 & 2 and as nothing is on record to show that this petition is filed out of coercion or threat and the petitioners have also not withdrawn their consent during pendency of the petition, this Court is of the considered opinion that all the essential ingredients for grant of divorce on mutual consent are satisfied in this case. Hence, the point is answered holding that petitioners are entitled to decree of divorce on mutual consent.

8.In the result, the petition is allowed. The marriage dated 24.11.2021 in between Petitioner No.1/Nagandla @ Parakala Ravalika and Petitioner

No.2/Parakala Aravind, is dissolved from today by passing decree of divorce on mutual consent of the petitioners. No costs.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 6th day of May, 2026.

Sd/-

Senior Civil Judge-cum-,

Asst. Sessions Judge, Huzurabad

HMOP.NO. 15 OF 2026

5 of 5

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR THE PETITIONERS

P.W.1: Nagandla @ Parakala Ravalika P.W.2: Parakala Aravind

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR THE PETITIONERS:

Ex.P1: Original Wedding card Ex.P2: Original Marriage photograph

Sd/-

Senior Civil Judge-cum-,

Asst. Sessions Judge, Huzurabad.

H.M.O.P/64/2026

Gangarapu Mahesh vs None

06 May 2026

HMOP.NO. 64 OF 2026

1 of 4

IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE CUM ASSISTANT

SESSIONS JUDGE, HUZURABAD

Present:-Sri P. B. KIRAN KUMAR,

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Asst. Sessions Judge,

HUZURABAD

Wednesday, this the 6th day of May, 2026

HMOP No. 64 of 2026

Between :- Gangarapu Mahesh, s/o Ramaswamy, age: 28 yrs, occ: Agriculture, r/o Ellandakunta village and mandal of Karimnagar district.

…Petitioner No.1

AND

Gangarapu @ Shanigarapu Anjali, w/o Gangarapu Mahesh, d/o Shanigarapu Sammaiah, age: 25 yrs, occ: Housewife, r/o Ellandakunta village and mandal of Karimnagar district.

...Petitioner No.2

This petition is coming before me for final hearing and disposal in the presence of Sri M.Sadaiah and Smt. G.Padmavathi, learned counsels for petitioners and the petition having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court made the following:-

:: ORDER ::

This petition is filed by petitioner Nos.1 & 2 under Section 13-B of the

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, praying this court to dissolve their marriage dated 24.12.2019 and to grant decree of divorce by mutual consent.

2.The case of the petitioners in brief is that the petitioner No.1 is the legally wedded husband of the petitioner No.2. Their marriage was solemnized on 24.12.2019 at the house of petitioner NO.2 at Ellandakunta village and

HMOP.NO. 64 OF 2026

2 of 4 mandal of Karimnagar district, as per the Hindu Customs and Traditions prevailing in their community.

2.1.After the marriage, the petitioners lived happily for some period only.

During their wedlock no issues were born to them. Thereafter, some disputes and differences arose in between them and the petitioner No.2 left the society of petitioner No.1 on 24.11.2020 and went to her parents’ house. In the mean while several panchayaths were conducted in between the petitioners and they were not fruitful. As such, they have not been able to live together and in future there is no hope of any reconciliation or re-union between the petitioners. Therefore, the petitioners are agreed that their marriage should be got dissolved through court of law on mutual consent.

2.2. The petitioners are already exchanged their belongings, gold and silver ornaments, clothes and articles of each other and nothing is left over to be exchanged. It is therefore necessary in the interest of both the petitioners that the marriage between them be dissolved by a decree of divorce, so that they may be able to lead their lives independently and re-marry if they so desire of their own choice. Hence, this petition for grant of divorce on mutual consent.

3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.

4.The point that arises for consideration in this petition is:-

“Whether petitioners 1 & 2 are entitled to take divorce by way of

mutual consent as per Section 13 (B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, as

prayed for or not?

HMOP.NO. 64 OF 2026

3 of 4

5.The Petitioner No.1 is examined as PW-1 and petitioner No.2 is examined as Pw.2, in support of their case and marked Exs.P1 and Ex.P2 through Pw1 on their behalf.

6. POINT:As per the contentions submitted by both the petitioners, it is an admitted fact that both petitioners got married with each other on 24.12.2019 at the house of petitioner NO.2 at Ellandakunta village and mandal of Karimnagar district, as per Hindu rites and customs, but on 24.11.2020, the petitioner No.2 left the society of the petitioner No.1 and since then she has been residing with her parent’s house and as such, it can be said that the petitioner No.1 & 2 cannot reside as wife and husband under one roof and further continuation of marriage in between them amounts to mental agony to both of them. Hence, on elders advice, both petitioners decided to obtain divorce by way of mutual consent. The petitioners are already entered into mutual agreement by way of compromise. During pendency of the case, both petitioners have filed an interlocutory Application U/sec. 13-B(2) of Hindu

Marriage Act to waive off the cooling period of six months and the same was allowed by this court vide IA.No. 270 of 2026 dt: 04.05.2026.

HMOP.NO. 64 OF 2026

4 of 4 petitioner Nos.1 & 2 and as nothing is on record to show that this petition is filed out of coercion or threat and the petitioners have also not withdrawn their consent during pendency of the petition, this Court is of the considered opinion that all the essential ingredients for grant of divorce on mutual consent are satisfied in this case. Hence, the point is answered holding that petitioners are entitled to decree of divorce on mutual consent.

8.In the result, the petition is allowed. The marriage dated 24.12.2019 in between Petitioner No.1/Gangarapu Mahesh and Petitioner No.2/Gangarapu @

Shanigarapu Anjali, is dissolved from today by passing decree of divorce on mutual consent of the petitioners. No costs.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 6th day of May, 2026.

Sd/-

Senior Civil Judge-cum-,

Asst. Sessions Judge, Huzurabad

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR THE PETITIONERS

P.W.1: Gangarapu Mahesh P.W.2: Gangarapu @ Shanigarapu Anjali

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR THE PETITIONERS:

Ex.P1: Original Marriage certificate Ex.P2: Original Joint photographs (2) in number

Sd/-

Senior Civil Judge-cum-,

Asst. Sessions Judge, Huzurabad.

Order Record 525 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
H.M.O.P/15/2026	Nagandla alias Parakala Ravalika vs None	06 May 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/44/2026	Deshetty Sandhya Rani vs None	06 May 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/64/2026	Gangarapu Mahesh vs None	06 May 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/62/2026	Bollaveni Radhika alias Neduru Radhika vs None	05 May 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/125/2025	Anuri alias Paindla Udaya Sri alias Kavya Sri vs Anuri Pradeep	05 May 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/144/2025	Gottimukkula alias Rampelly Sravani vs Gottimukkula Ashwin Kumar	05 May 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/42/2026	Kethiri Dilip Kumar vs None	01 May 2026	Order	—
OS/18/2025	Thalla Ramadevi vs Odela Saikumar	30 Apr 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/7/2026	Narahari Sathish vs None	29 Apr 2026	Order	—
SC/355/2021	The State through the Inspector of Police, Keshavapatnam P.S. vs Radharapu Lachaiah	28 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/57/2019	Mididoddi Anil Kumar vs Mididodi Sunitha	23 Apr 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/16/2025	Manchala alias Lakkarsu Ramya alias Manasa vs Manchala Rakesh	17 Apr 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/29/2026	Mahankali Raju vs None	17 Apr 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/147/2025	Chiluveri Sadanandam vs Chiluveri Madhavi alias Sandhya	17 Apr 2026	Order	—
OS/402/2025	SBI Veenavanka Branch, Karimnagar District vs Azgaree Begum	16 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/33/2026	Mada alias Boda Deepthi vs None	16 Apr 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/49/2026	Shriram Pranav alias Pranav Suhas vs Shriram alias Thoutam Mounika	16 Apr 2026	Order	—
OS/37/2025	Nalla Ravinder Reddy vs Nalla Prabhakar Reddy	13 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/122/2023	Kondu Ravinder vs Kondu Latha	09 Apr 2026	Order	—
OS/422/2025	Kalakoti Kishan Rao vs Karri Ravinder	06 Apr 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/18/2026	Bathini Sagar vs None	06 Apr 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/28/2026	Kunchapu alias Kuncham Aravind vs None	06 Apr 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/23/2026	Dasarapu alias Gundeti Ramya vs None	02 Apr 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/143/2025	Thirunahari Nikhil vs Thirunahari alias Thirukovaluri Sriteja	02 Apr 2026	Order	—
OS/20/2025	Mahankali Rajanna vs Chaduvu Narayana Reddy	31 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/381/2025	Gajjeela Jyothi vs Mogudumpuram Sunil Kumar	31 Mar 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/31/2026	Chidurala alias Katla Preethi vs None	30 Mar 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/59/2023	Chanda Saikumar vs Chanda @ Malyala Ravali	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
EP/2/2026	Poreddy Ram Reddy vs Ummemthula Sammi Reddy	25 Mar 2026	Order	—
EP/29/2025	M/s Shubanandini Chit Funds Ltd., R/by its Branch Manager Diddi Rammurthy vs Mokenapelli Mallesh	25 Mar 2026	Order	—
EP/31/2025	Kapil Chit Funds Pvt. Ltd. Huzurabad R/by P. Raju. vs Vulisha Prabhakar	25 Mar 2026	Order	—
OS/106/2019	Meshineni Ashok Rao vs Padidela Ashok Rao	24 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/351/2025	Kodari Saraiah vs Kodari Ailaiah	23 Mar 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/2/2026	Kommu alias Alle Aparna alias Sravanthi vs Kommu Raju	23 Mar 2026	Order	—
SC/18/2023	The State through Circle Inspector of Police, Huzurabad Rural vs Lankasiri Raju	17 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/30/2024	Prathapa Rajesham vs Prathapa Ravinder	16 Mar 2026	Order	—
OS/157/2025	Prathapa Komuraiah vs Prathapa Ravinder	16 Mar 2026	Order	—
OS/158/2025	Prathapa Vajramma vs Prathapa Ravinder	16 Mar 2026	Order	—
EP/45/2017	Margadarsi chit fund pvt ltd vs Aluguri karunakar	13 Mar 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/3/2026	Ranaveni alias Regula Haritha vs None	13 Mar 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/35/2025	Bellam Ganesh vs Maddi alias Bellam Pravalika	13 Mar 2026	Order	—
OS/214/2025	Ellandula Kanukaiah vs Ellandula Ravi	11 Mar 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/61/2024	Talla @ Kothakonda Swarupa vs Talla Venkatesh	11 Mar 2026	Order	—
SC/202/2019	The State through SHO, Huzurabad. vs Pulla Vijay Kumar	10 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/8/2026	Kore alias Gopu Aruna vs None	06 Mar 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/14/2026	Chaduvu Sreeja vs None	06 Mar 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/63/2023	Revelli Swaroopa vs Revelli Ramulu	05 Mar 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/51/2022	Murahari Rajesh vs Murahari Rani@ Vijigiri Rajitha	26 Feb 2026	Order	—
OS/198/2025	Gouda Beeraiah vs Bandari Gattiah	24 Feb 2026	Order	—
EP/4/2026	Velishala Santhosh vs Rupireddy Anitha	23 Feb 2026	Order	—
OS/15/2023	Jadala Naveena Gayatri vs Jadala Srinivas	23 Feb 2026	Order	—
SC/215/2022	The State through the Sub-Inspector of Police, P.S. Jammikunta vs Godugu Thirupathi	20 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
SC/389/2018	J. Narsimhulu vs Diddi Mahesh	20 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/141/2025	Chepuri Arun Kumar vs None	20 Feb 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/75/2023	Gumpula Sampath vs Gumpula Sahasra @ Kasu Shirisha	19 Feb 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/124/2025	Kothuri Thirupathi vs None	19 Feb 2026	Order	—
OS/314/2025	kolipaka veeramallu vs Vskolipaka Hanumanthu	18 Feb 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/12/2026	Nampelli alias Shanigarapu Sri Divya alias Divya vs None	13 Feb 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/69/2025	Nampalli alias Chiluveru Srilatha vs None	13 Feb 2026	Order	—
IP/7/2024	Potharaju Ramesh vs Yatapolu Sathish	12 Feb 2026	Order	—
OS/62/2025	Adulapuram Shankaraiah vs Vadloori Omkar	12 Feb 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/112/2024	Kothuri Thirupathi vs Kothuri Divya @ Vasantha	12 Feb 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/129/2024	Thallapally Ajay Kumar alias Ajay Kumar Goud vs Thallapally alias Bathini Pravalika	12 Feb 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/150/2025	Yalla alias Pothula Mounika vs Pothula Santhosh Reddy	12 Feb 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/161/2022	Nandipata Mahender vs Nandipata @ Chiluka Sneha	12 Feb 2026	Order	—
OS/25/2025	Namani Devender vs Bandi Srinivas	10 Feb 2026	Order	—
OS/383/2025	Myakala Manemma vs Myakala Sharada and another	10 Feb 2026	Order	—
OS/232/2025	More Murali vs K.Thirupathi and others	09 Feb 2026	Order	—
OS/395/2025	Polneni Sathyanrayana Rao vs Poly Yellaiah	09 Feb 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/98/2025	Edelli Ravinder Reddy vs None	06 Feb 2026	Order	—
CMA/6/2020	Katanguri Ramakrishna Reddy vs Sammeta Narsaiah	04 Feb 2026	Order	—
CMA/7/2020	Katanguri Ramakrishna Reddy vs Sammeta Laxmi	04 Feb 2026	Order	—
EP/47/2018	Avirineni Swamy Rao vs Karra Kondal Reddy Sampath Reddy	04 Feb 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/94/2025	Kona Sai Somashekar vs Kona Alias Myasa Rama	03 Feb 2026	Order	—
OS/85/2025	Ambavaram Chandrashekhar Reddy vs Muppidi Ambuja Reddy	02 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
OS/277/2025	Kodurupaka Rajakumari vs Kodurupaka Srinivas	30 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/189/2021	Medichelimi Praveen, S/o Ramesh vs Medichelimi Supriya, W/o Praveen, D/o Kondapaka Sadanandam	29 Jan 2026	Order	—
AS/3/2024	Kalva Malla Reddy vs Byreddy Thirupathi Reddy (Died his LRs R3 to 6)	28 Jan 2026	Order	—
OS/40/2025	Kasarla Laxminarayana @ Kavyachandana vs Kasarla Sharada	28 Jan 2026	Order	—
OS/72/2019	Ramidi Venugopal vs Manda Saritha	28 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
OS/323/2025	Kavitham Anjaneyulu vs Komuravelli Sridhar	28 Jan 2026	Order	—
OS/91/2025	Chiremshetty Vidyasagar vs Chiremshetty Rajamallaiah and 3 others	27 Jan 2026	Order	—
OS/102/2025	chinthala Ram reddy vs Arepally Chandraiah	27 Jan 2026	Order	—
OS/243/2025	Polu Venkatrajam vs Keshaveni Ramesh	27 Jan 2026	Order	—
AS/3/2023	Kodigooti Sidhartha Rao Minor r/by his mother Himabindu vs Kodigooti Rajaiah	22 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
OS/328/2025	Kambala Komuraiah vs Bolledla Sarojana	21 Jan 2026	Order	—
H.M.O.P/75/2025	Gurram Srinivas Goud vs Gurram alias Pachimatla Anusha	20 Jan 2026	Order	—
S.O.P/4/2024	Kazipeta Sathyanarayana vs Kazipeta Nimisha	20 Jan 2026	Order	—
OS/3/2025	Eluri Narayana Reddy vs Bajjuri Thirumala	19 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
OS/149/2025	Kadarla Bikshapathi vs Chaduvu Jaipal Reddy	19 Jan 2026	Order	—
OS/330/2025	Oddi Kanakaiah vs Boini Sammaiah	09 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/59/2025	Paladugula alias Dharumula Mounika alias Susmitha vs Paladugula Sathish	09 Jan 2026	Order	—
EP/6/2023	Guddelugula Sammaiah vs Pulugu Linga Reddy	07 Jan 2026	Order	—
OS/331/2025	Vaidula Raji Reddy vs Moogala Raji Reddy	07 Jan 2026	Order	—
OS/127/2025	Jella Mallamma vs Jella Shankar	05 Jan 2026	Order	—
OS/148/2025	Padmashali seva samithi Huzurabad r/p Vemula Yadagiri S/o Venkaiah vs Nampalli Ailaiah	05 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
EP/15/2021	Goskula Komuraiah, S/o Late Rajaiah (died) vs Gandrakota Mondaiah, S/o Ailaiah	31 Dec 2025	Order	—
OS/119/2025	Avunoori Venkataiah vs Banda Veera Reddy and 4 others	31 Dec 2025	Order	—
OS/230/2025	Vanaparthi Anil vs Nalla Komal Reddy	31 Dec 2025	Order	—
H.M.O.P/55/2022	Nuka Ramesh vs Nuka Swetha @ Mada Swetha	31 Dec 2025	Order	—

Showing 100 of 525 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

May 2026		7
Apr 2026		17
Mar 2026		26
Feb 2026		28
Jan 2026		21
Dec 2025		33
Nov 2025		31
Oct 2025		25
Sep 2025		34
Aug 2025		31
Jul 2025		48
Jun 2025		38

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Sri. P.B. Kiran Kumar handled?

Sri. P.B. Kiran Kumar has handled 536 court orders since 2024 at Huzurabad, SCJ Court Complex. The average disposal rate is 28 orders per month.

What types of cases does Sri. P.B. Kiran Kumar hear?

Based on available records, Sri. P.B. Kiran Kumar primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Sessions Cases) at Huzurabad, SCJ Court Complex.

Where is Sri. P.B. Kiran Kumar currently posted?

Sri. P.B. Kiran Kumar is posted as Senior Civil Judge Karimnagar at Huzurabad, SCJ Court Complex, Karimnagar, Telangana.

Are judgments by Sri. P.B. Kiran Kumar available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Sri. P.B. Kiran Kumar are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Sri. P.B. Kiran Kumar dispose cases?

Sri. P.B. Kiran Kumar disposes approximately 28 cases per month, based on 536 orders handled over their tenure at Huzurabad, SCJ Court Complex.

Since when is Sri. P.B. Kiran Kumar serving?

Sri. P.B. Kiran Kumar has been serving at Huzurabad, SCJ Court Complex since 2024. and is currently posted there.

Case Types

H 45%

OS 28%

EP 14%

SC 5%

IP 3%

CMA 3%

AS 2%

S 1%

Posting History

Oct 2024 — Present

Senior Civil Judge Karimnagar · 536 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Ms. Padma Sai Sree

Prl Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of...

287 orders

Ms. K.Veena Pranathi

II Addl Junior Civil Judge

7 orders

← View all judges at Huzurabad, SCJ Court Complex