Sri. P. Narayana Babu

Addl. District Judge (POCSO)

Mancherial, PDJ Court Complex · Mancherial · Telangana

Sri. P. Narayana Babu, Addl. District Judge (POCSO), is posted at Mancherial, PDJ Court Complex, Mancherial, Telangana, India. 419 court orders on record since 2019. 10 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CRLMP, EP, MVOP cases.

419

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

CRLMP.BAIL/3/2021

Bandi Shekar alias Chandra Shekar vs The State of TElangana through SHO P.S. Luxettipet.

21 Jan 2021

IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (FTC)

ADILABAD AT MANCHERIAL

PRESENT: SRI P. NARAYANA BABU FAC: II Addl. District and Sessions Judge (FTC)Adilabad At Mancherial

Thursday, this the 22nd day of January, 2021

Crl.M.P.No.3/2021

Cr.No.288/2020 of PS Luxettipet

Between: Bandi Shekar @ Chandrashekar, S/o Rajaiah, Age: 30 years, Caste: Perika, Occ: Coolie, R/o Patha Kommugudem village.

… Petitioner/Accused // And //

The State of Telangana through S.H.O., PS.Luxettipet. …Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming before me for final hearing on 20012021 in the presence of Sri Kotha Sathaiah, Advocate for the petitioner/Accused and Sri N. Raj Kumar, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State and having heard and perused the material on record and stood for consideration to till this day, this court delivered the following:

:: O R D E R::

1.This is second bail petition filed U/S. 439 of Cr.P.C. praying the court to grant regular bail to the petitioner/Accused in Cr.No.288/2020 of P.S.

Luxettipet for the offences U/Sec. 307 & 448 IPC.

2.The prosecution allegation is that, accused and victim/Sanga Srihari are relatives, there are disputes running between them with regard to petty issues since few days. As usual on 17122020 accused completed coolie work in the house of victim and went to his house, at about 15.15 hours accused came to the house of victim and asked money for drinking alcohol, for which victim refused, on that accused picked up quarrel with the victim and tried to take money forcibly from the packet of the victim, but the victim did not give money, then the accused went outside; after few minutes accused criminally trespassed into the house of victim, beat him with tractor iron rod on his head and hands by saying as “ninnu e roju champestanu”. Due to which the victim received severe bleeding injuries on his head and hands and fell unconscious. Basing on the complaint given by LW1/Sanga Laxmi/wife of the victim, SHO of PS Luxettipet registered a case in Cr.No.288/2020 for the offences U/Sec. 448, 307 IPC.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused submitted that, the petitioner is innocent, he did not commit any offence, the allegations of prosecution against the petitioner/Accused are false and baseless. It is further submitted that the petitioner/Accused is coolie, having old aged parents and small children, he is the only earning member of his family, if he continued in jail his family members will be put to starvation. It is further submitted that the entire investigation is completed, except filing of charge sheet. Hence, prayed he may be enlarged on bail.

4.On the other side, notice given to the learned APP. The learned APP filed counter contending that, there is a primafacie and reasonable ground to believe that the accused committed the offence. Investigation is pending, if the petitioner/accused enlarged on bail, he may escape from the investigation, he may commit similar offence and he may tamper the prosecution witnesses.

Moreover the victim is still undergoing treatment, medical certificate to be collected. Hence, prayed to dismiss the petition.

5. Heard arguments.

6.Now the point for determination is:

Whether the petitioner/Accused is entitled to be enlarged on bail?

POINT :

7.On perusal of the record, it discloses that, the petitioner has allegedly shown as accused in Cr.No.288/2020 of PS Luxettipet for the offences

U/Sec. 448, 307 IPC. The learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail. As seen from the record, the petitioner/Accused remanded to judicial custody on 23122020 and lodged in District Jail, Adilabad. The remand case diary reveals that, police recorded the statements of LWs.1 to 8, CDF prepared, entire investigation is completed except filing of charge sheet. It would not be caused any tamper or hamper to prosecution case by the petitioner/accused. Counsel for the petitioner/accused argued that, victim was discharged from the hospital and he is attending his agricultural work, petitioner/accused is in jail since one month, if he continued in jail his family members will be put to starvation. This is second bail petition, first bail petition was dismissed by this court on 07012021 vide Crl.M.P.No.192/2020.

Further there is no cases against the petitioner/accused except present alleged crime. The available records does not shows any pre plan or intention or preparation to commit the offence U/Sec.307 IPC. Whether the petitioner/accused committed the offence U/Sec.307 IPC or 324 IPC will be decided after full fledged trial. Considering the averments of the petition and facts and circumstance of the case I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner/accused on bail. Hence, this point is answered infavour of the petitioner/accused.

8.IN THE RESULT, this petition is allowed. The petitioner /accused shall be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond for Rs.15,000/ (Rupees

Fifteen thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judl. First Class Magistrate, Luxettipet. Further directing the petitioner/Accused shall not induce or threaten the prosecution witnesses and directing the petitioner/accused to attend before the Station House Officer,

Luxettipet on every Sunday in between 10.00 AM to 12.00 noon for two months or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier.

Typed to my dictation by the Steno, and after corrections, pronounced by me in open court on this the 21st day of January, 2021.

III Addl. District and Sessions JudgeAdilabad, FAC: II Addl. District and Sessions Judge(FTC)Adilabad, At Mancherial. Copy to:

1. The Superintendent, District Jail, Adilabad 2 JFCM, Luxettipet

3. The SHO, of PS Luxettipet

4. Sri Kotha Sathaiah, Advocate for the petitioner/Accused (on payment of usual charges).

CRLMP.BAIL/3/2021

Bandi Shekar alias Chandra Shekar vs The State of TElangana through SHO P.S. Luxettipet.

21 Jan 2021

IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (FTC)

ADILABAD AT MANCHERIAL

PRESENT: SRI P. NARAYANA BABU FAC: II Addl. District and Sessions Judge (FTC)Adilabad At Mancherial

Thursday, this the 22nd day of January, 2021

Crl.M.P.No.3/2021

Cr.No.288/2020 of PS Luxettipet

Between: Bandi Shekar @ Chandrashekar, S/o Rajaiah, Age: 30 years, Caste: Perika, Occ: Coolie, R/o Patha Kommugudem village.

… Petitioner/Accused // And //

The State of Telangana through S.H.O., PS.Luxettipet. …Respondent/Complainant

:: O R D E R::

1.This is second bail petition filed U/S. 439 of Cr.P.C. praying the court to grant regular bail to the petitioner/Accused in Cr.No.288/2020 of P.S.

Luxettipet for the offences U/Sec. 307 & 448 IPC.

Moreover the victim is still undergoing treatment, medical certificate to be collected. Hence, prayed to dismiss the petition.

5. Heard arguments.

6.Now the point for determination is:

Whether the petitioner/Accused is entitled to be enlarged on bail?

POINT :

7.On perusal of the record, it discloses that, the petitioner has allegedly shown as accused in Cr.No.288/2020 of PS Luxettipet for the offences

8.IN THE RESULT, this petition is allowed. The petitioner /accused shall be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond for Rs.15,000/ (Rupees

Luxettipet on every Sunday in between 10.00 AM to 12.00 noon for two months or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier.

Typed to my dictation by the Steno, and after corrections, pronounced by me in open court on this the 21st day of January, 2021.

III Addl. District and Sessions JudgeAdilabad, FAC: II Addl. District and Sessions Judge(FTC)Adilabad, At Mancherial. Copy to:

1. The Superintendent, District Jail, Adilabad 2 JFCM, Luxettipet

3. The SHO, of PS Luxettipet

4. Sri Kotha Sathaiah, Advocate for the petitioner/Accused (on payment of usual charges).

CRLMP.BAIL/2/2021

Chekurthi Ramesh vs The State of Telangana through SHO P.S. mancherial.

18 Jan 2021

IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (FTC)

ADILABAD AT MANCHERIAL

PRESENT: SRI P. NARAYANA BABU FAC: II Addl. District and Sessions Judge (FTC)-Adilabad At Mancherial

Monday, this the 18th day of January, 2021

Crl.M.P.No.2/2021

Cr.No.455/2020 of PS Mancherial

Between:

Chekurthi Ramesh, S/o Rajanna, Age: 42 years, Caste: Madiga/SC, Occ: Sr. Asst. Irrigation department, Asifabad, R/o H.No.18-485, Labour colony, Mancherial.

… Petitioner/Accused // And // The State of Telangana through S.H.O., PS. Mancherial. …Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming before me for final hearing on 18-01-2021 in the presence of Sri Kotha Sathaiah, counsel for the petitioner/Accused and Sri N. Raj Kumar, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State and having heard and perused the material on record and stood for consideration to till this day, this court delivered the following:-

:: O R D E R::

1.This is second bail petition filed U/S. 439 of Cr.P.C. praying the court to grant regular bail to the petitioner/Accused in Cr.No. 455/2020 of P.S. Mancherial for the offences

U/Sec.498-A, 304-B IPC.

2.The prosecution allegation is that, marriage of the deceased/ Ankathi @ Chekurthi Varsha @ Harshitha was performed with the accused on 20-08-2017, their marriage was love marriage.

They lived happily for a period of two years, later the accused used to harass the deceased to bring dowry of Rs.10 lacs from her parents and also she has not conceived. As usual on 20-11- 2020 at about 4.00 PM accused came to home in drunken state and picked up quarrel with the deceased for dowry. Due to unbearable harassment of the accused, the deceased lit fire herself with the flames of cooking stove in kitchen and sustained burn injuries. On 30-11-20120 the deceased succumbed at MGM Hospital, Warangal with burn injuries. Basing on the complaint given by LW1/Ankathi Venkateshwarlu/ father of deceased, SHO of PS Mancherial registered a case in Cr.No.455/2020 for the offences U/Sec.498-A, 306 r/w 108 IPC. Later section of law altered from 498-A, 306 r/w 108 IPC to 498-A, 304-B IPC.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused submitted that, the petitioner/Accused is innocent, he is no way concerned with the alleged offence, the defacto complainant falsely -1- lodged complaint against the petitioner/Accused to harass him, that the entire investigation is completed, except filing of charge sheet. It is further submitted that the petitioner/Accused is government employee, having aged parents, if he continues to be in jail his family members will be put to starvation. Hence, prayed that the petitioner/Accused may be enlarged on bail in the interest of justice.

4.On the other side, notice given to the learned APP who opposed the bail.

5. Heard arguments.

6.Now the point for determination is:

Whether the petitioner/Accused is entitled to be enlarged on bail? POINT :

7.On perusal of the record, it discloses that, the petitioner/accused has allegedly shown as accused in Cr.No.455/2020 of PS Mancherial for the offences U/Sec.498-A, 304-B IPC. The petitioner/Accused has remanded to judicial custody on 14-12-2020 and lodged in District Jail,

Adilabad. The remand case diary reveals that, police recorded the statements of LWs.1 to 14 in written, entire investigation is completed except filing of charge sheet. It would not be caused any tamper or hamper by the petitioner/accused. This is second bail petition, first bail petition was dismissed by this court on 31-12-2020 vide Crl.M.P.No.186/2020. The allegations leveled against the petitioner/accused by the police Mancherial will be decided after full fledged trial.

Considering the averments of the petition and facts and circumstance of the case I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner/accused on bail. Hence, this point is answered infavour of the petitioner/accused.

8.IN THE RESULT, this petition is allowed. The petitioner /accused shall be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned II Addl. Judl. First Class Magistrate,

Mancherial. Further directing the petitioner/Accused shall not induce or threaten the prosecution witnesses and directing the petitioner/accused to attend before the Station House

Officer, Mancherial on every Monday in between 10.00 AM to 12.00 noon for two months or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier.

Typed to my dictation by the Steno, and after corrections, pronounced by me in open court on this the 18th day of January, 2021.

III Addl. District and Sessions Judge-Adilabad, FAC: II Addl. District and Sessions Judge(FTC)-Adilabad, At Mancherial. Copy to:

1. The Superintendent, District Jail, Adilabad

2. II Addl. JFCM, Mancherial

3. The SHO, of PS Mancherial

4. Sri Kotha Sathaiah, Advocate for the petitioner/Accused (on payment of usual charges) 2 3

CRLMP.BAIL/2/2021

Chekurthi Ramesh vs The State of Telangana through SHO P.S. mancherial.

18 Jan 2021

IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (FTC)

ADILABAD AT MANCHERIAL

PRESENT: SRI P. NARAYANA BABU FAC: II Addl. District and Sessions Judge (FTC)-Adilabad At Mancherial

Monday, this the 18th day of January, 2021

Crl.M.P.No.2/2021

Cr.No.455/2020 of PS Mancherial

Between:

Chekurthi Ramesh, S/o Rajanna, Age: 42 years, Caste: Madiga/SC, Occ: Sr. Asst. Irrigation department, Asifabad, R/o H.No.18-485, Labour colony, Mancherial.

… Petitioner/Accused // And // The State of Telangana through S.H.O., PS. Mancherial. …Respondent/Complainant

:: O R D E R::

1.This is second bail petition filed U/S. 439 of Cr.P.C. praying the court to grant regular bail to the petitioner/Accused in Cr.No. 455/2020 of P.S. Mancherial for the offences

U/Sec.498-A, 304-B IPC.

2.The prosecution allegation is that, marriage of the deceased/ Ankathi @ Chekurthi Varsha @ Harshitha was performed with the accused on 20-08-2017, their marriage was love marriage.

4.On the other side, notice given to the learned APP who opposed the bail.

5. Heard arguments.

6.Now the point for determination is:

Whether the petitioner/Accused is entitled to be enlarged on bail? POINT :

Mancherial. Further directing the petitioner/Accused shall not induce or threaten the prosecution witnesses and directing the petitioner/accused to attend before the Station House

Officer, Mancherial on every Monday in between 10.00 AM to 12.00 noon for two months or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier.

Typed to my dictation by the Steno, and after corrections, pronounced by me in open court on this the 18th day of January, 2021.

III Addl. District and Sessions Judge-Adilabad, FAC: II Addl. District and Sessions Judge(FTC)-Adilabad, At Mancherial. Copy to:

1. The Superintendent, District Jail, Adilabad

2. II Addl. JFCM, Mancherial

3. The SHO, of PS Mancherial

4. Sri Kotha Sathaiah, Advocate for the petitioner/Accused (on payment of usual charges) 2 3

CRLMP.BAIL/1/2021

Kema Ravi Kiran vs State of Telangana through SHO P.S. Luxettipet.

18 Jan 2021

IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (FTC)

ADILABAD AT MANCHERIAL

PRESENT: SRI P. NARAYANA BABU FAC: II Addl. District and Sessions Judge (FTC), Mancherial

Monday, this the 18th day of January, 2021

Crl.M.P.No.1/2021

Cr.No.176/2020 of PS Luxettipet

Between: Kema Ravi Kiran, S/o Mallaiah, Age: 30 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o H.No.3-3-223, Mahalaxmiwada, Adilabad town and district. … Petitioner/A4 // And //

The State of Telangana represented through S.H.O., PS. Luxettipet. …Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming before me for final hearing on 18-01-2021 in the presence of Sri D. Thirupathi, Advocate for the petitioner/A4 and Sri N. Raj Kumar, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State and having heard and perused the material on record and stood for consideration to till this day, this court delivered the following:-

:: O R D E R::

1.This is second bail petition filed U/S. 438 of Cr.P.C. praying the court to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/A4 in Cr.No.176/2020 of P.S. Luxettipet for the offences

U/Sec. 420, 120 (b) r/w Sec.34 IPC, Sec.15 (1) of EP Act, 1986 and Sec.19 of Seeds Act, 1966.

2.The allegations of the prosecution’s is that, on 26-06-2020 at about 11.00 AM at bus stop of Itikyala village, police Luxettipet caught hold the petitioner/A3 along with A1 & A2 while they transporting cotton seeds which were banned by the Telangana government. Defacto complainant/Mandal Agriculture Officer, Luxettipet conducted panchanama, seized one bag from

A1 containing 20 kgs suspicious cotton seeds, seized two bags from A2 to A4 containing 20 Kg suspicious cotton seeds in each bag. Thereafter, basing on the complaint SHO, PS Luxettipet registered a case U/Sec.420, 120(b) r/w Sec.34 IPC, Sec.15(1) EP Act 1986 and Sec.19 of Seeds

Act, 1966.

3.The crux of contention of the petitioner/A4 in his petition is that, basing on confession of

A1 police Luxettipet registered a false case against the petitioner/A4, the petitioner/A4 never went to the Itikyal bus stand and no cotton seeds with him, police Luxettipert created a false story for the purpose of registering the case, that petitioner/A4 is innocent. Police Luxettipet without any reason kept the petitioner in police station from morning to evening, hence the petitioner/A4 is apprehending arrest in the said case. The allegations made by the prosecution are false and baseless. Hence, prayed for granting anticipatory bail.

4.Notice given to the the learned Additional Public Prosecutor who opposed the bail.

5. Heard arguments.

6. Now the points that arose for determination are:

1. Whether the petitioner/A4 is entitled to get anticipatory bail as prayed for?

2. To what relief?

POINT NO.1:

7.On keen perusal of the record it reveals that, the petitioners shown as A4 in

Cr.No.176/2020 of PS Luxettipet for the offences U/Sec.420, 120(b) r/w Sec.34 IPC, Sec.15(1)

EP Act 1986 and Sec.19 of Seeds Act 1966. In this case A1 to A3 are already enlarged on station bail. The investigation officer has examined and recorded Lws.1 to 8 statements . This is second Anticipatory bail petition, first bail petition was dismissed by this court on 31-12-2020 vide Crl.M.P.No.188/2020 as the particulars of petitioner were not tallied with First Information

Report. Whether the alleged seeds are banned or not will be decided after full fledged trial. If the petitioner/A4 enlarged on bail no prejudice will be caused to the investigation. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case I am inclined to grant Anticipatory bail to the petitioner/A4.

Accordingly, the point No.1 is answered in favour of the petitioner/A4.

POINT NO.2:

8.IN THE RESULT, this petition is allowed. Petitioner/A4 is directed to surrender before the JFCM, Luxettipet within one week from the date of this order on any working day at 10.30

AM., after giving notice to the respondent and he shall be released on bail on executing his personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) with two sureties like sum to the satisfaction of JFCM, Luxettipet. Directing the petitioner/ A4 shall appear before the SHO, PS

Luxettipet on every Monday till filing of charge sheet or for two months whichever is earlier.

Further directing the petitioners/A4 shall not induce or threaten any prosecution witnesses and cooperate with the investigation as and when required.

Typed to my dictation by the Steno, and after corrections, pronounced by me in the open court on this the 18th day of January, 2021.

III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Asifabad, FAC: II Addl. District and Sessions Judge (FTC), Adilabad At Mancherial. Copy to:

1. The JFCM, Luxettipet

2. The SHO of PS Luxettipet

3. Sri D. thirupathi , learned counsel for the petitioner/A4 (on payment of usual charges).

Order Record 337 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
CRLMP.BAIL/3/2021	Bandi Shekar alias Chandra Shekar vs The State of TElangana through SHO P.S. Luxettipet.	21 Jan 2021	Order	—
EP/49/2020	Shriram City Union Finance Ltd vs Guguloth Erya	20 Jan 2021	Order	—
OP/5/2019	Ailapuri Anurag vs Ailapuri Sabateena alias Katta Sabateena	20 Jan 2021	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/1/2021	Kema Ravi Kiran vs State of Telangana through SHO P.S. Luxettipet.	18 Jan 2021	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/2/2021	Chekurthi Ramesh vs The State of Telangana through SHO P.S. mancherial.	18 Jan 2021	Order	—
EP/1/2020	M/s. Shriram City ULnion Finance Ltd., Mancherial. vs Amarender Yadav Mekala	07 Jan 2021	Order	—
EP/26/2020	Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.,, rep. by its General Power of Attorney vs Kanakaraju Paligiri	07 Jan 2021	Order	—
EP/61/2019	Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. vs Venkataswamy Bijjuri	07 Jan 2021	Order	—
EP/148/2018	M/s. Margadarsi Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd., vs Akula Srinivas	07 Jan 2021	Order	—
CRLA/31/2017	Thippani Hari Prasad vs Rathna Madhukar	07 Jan 2021	Order	—
CRLA/107/2019	Sadala Bapu vs Sydala Renuka and 6 others	07 Jan 2021	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/187/2020	A4) Segyam Mallu vs The State of Telangana through SHO PS Jaipur	07 Jan 2021	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/190/2020	Penta Ramesh vs The State of Telangana through SHO PS Ramakrishnapur	07 Jan 2021	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/191/2020	A1) Anaveni Mallesh vs The State of Telangana through SHO P.S. Dandepalli.	07 Jan 2021	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/192/2020	Bandi Shekar alias chandra Shekar vs The State of Telangana through SHO P.S. Luxettipet.	07 Jan 2021	Order	—
OP/4/2020	Gorre Roopadevi vs Rapalli Sridhar	06 Jan 2021	Order	—
CRLA/109/2018	Bogoju Sridhar vs State of Telangana through SHO, P.S. mancherial.	06 Jan 2021	Order	—
AS/29/2018	Sabbani Basker vs Godisela Durgaiah	31 Dec 2020	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/185/2020	A1) Rajesh Murthy Prava vs The State of TElangana through SHO WPS Sriramur at Mancherial.	31 Dec 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/186/2020	Chekurthi Ramesh vs The State of Telangana through SHO P.S. Mancherial.	31 Dec 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/188/2020	Kema Ravi vs State of Telangana through SHO PS Luxettipet	31 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/47/2020	M/s. Sundaram Finance Limited vs Mr. E. Adithya	30 Dec 2020	Order	—
A.R.B.O.P/246/2018	Angaru Laxmi vs M/s. Shriram City Union Finance Limited, Mancherial and 2 others	30 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/36/2019	Shriram City Union Finance Ltd vs Kandepu Subba Rao	24 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/167/2019	Shriram Transport Finance Co., Ltd., rep. by its General Power ofAttorney vs Sravan Kumar Malishetty	24 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/177/2019	Shriram Transport Finance Co., Ltd., rep. by its General Power ofAttorney vs Sandeep Kunarapu	24 Dec 2020	Order	—
MVOP/245/2018	Vijaya Bake vs S.S.Logistics	24 Dec 2020	Order	—
CRLA/133/2019	Kasturi Venkata Sripada Rao vs Kasturi Prayaga	24 Dec 2020	Judgement	—
CRLRP/16/2019	Thirukovela Srinivas vs Thirukovela Swapna	24 Dec 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/181/2020	A1) Pagidi Manohar vs The State of TS through SHO PS Jaipur	24 Dec 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/182/2020	A1) Jeevan Kumar Kandukuri vs The State of T.S. rep. by P.S. Mandamarri.	24 Dec 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/183/2020	A1) Nenduguri Prashanth vs The State through Police, Chennur	24 Dec 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/184/2020	Pendem Vidya Sagar vs The State through Police, Ramakrishnapur	24 Dec 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/189/2020	A1) Anaveni Mallesh vs The State of Telangana through P.S. Dandepalli	24 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/143/2019	Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., vs Lingampalli Komuraiah	23 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/165/2019	Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., vs Kampelli Srinivas	23 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/169/2019	Shriram Transport Finance Co., Ltd., rep. by its General Power ofAttorney vs Damodar Neelam	23 Dec 2020	Order	—
CRLRP/8/2020	Errojula Ramesh Chari vs Errojula Laxmi	23 Dec 2020	Order	—
CRLRP/12/2019	Poosa Goutham Varma vs Poosa Shanmukhi	23 Dec 2020	Order	—
A.R.B.O.P/1/2019	Enagandula Mallaiah vs M/s. Shriram City Union Finance Lted.,	23 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/40/2020	Shriram City Union Finance Limited rep by its General Power of Attorney Sri A. Mallikarjun vs Ravi Dasari	17 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/107/2019	Shriram City Union Finance Limited Rept. by its General Power of Attorney vs Srinivas Chedagoppula	17 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/164/2019	Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., vs Thajoddin Shaik	17 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/171/2019	Shriram Transport Finance Co., Ltd., rep. by its General Power ofAttorney vs Santhosh Boyini	17 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/34/2019	Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. vs Mohammed Rafiquddin	16 Dec 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/179/2020	A1. Anaveni Mallesh vs The State of Telangana	16 Dec 2020	Order	—
MVOP/38/2019	Nakka Chandramma vs K. Srinivas	12 Dec 2020	Order	—
CRLA/25/2015	Aloni Prakash Rao vs Bodduna Satynarayana	12 Dec 2020	Order	—
AS/50/2018	Sanke Laxman vs Nimma Rajaiah	10 Dec 2020	Judgement	—
EP/17/2020	Shriram Transport Finance co., Ltd., rep. by its General Power of Attorney, Branch Mancherial vs Mohan Kadasi	10 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/123/2019	Shriram City Union Fianance Ltd. vs Narendula Sirdhar	10 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/142/2019	Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., vs Maddela Sambashiva Rao	10 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/149/2019	M/s. Sri laxmi narsimha Mandamarri Chit Funds Pvt. Ltd., vs Gunta Srishylam	10 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/172/2019	Shriram Transport Finance Co., Ltd., rep. by its General Power ofAttorney vs Hiraman Lakavath	10 Dec 2020	Order	—
SC/52/2020	The State of Telangna through Sub Inspector of Police, Mancherial vs Durgesh Koude	10 Dec 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/174/2020	Pendam Vidyasagar vs The State through Police, Ramakrishnapur	10 Dec 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/175/2020	A1. Pagidi Manohar vs The State through SHO PS. Jaipur	10 Dec 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/176/2020	A1. Nenduguri Prashanth vs The State of Telangana through SHO., PS. Chennur	10 Dec 2020	Order	—
CMA/11/2020	Boda Satheesh Reddy vs Mohd. Abdul Rasheed Khan	09 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/18/2020	Shriram Transport Finance co., Ltd., rep. by its General Power of Attorney, Branch Mancherial vs Kumar Tippani	09 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/19/2020	Shriram Transport Finance co., Ltd., rep. by its General Power of Attorney, Branch Mancherial vs Faran Mohammed	09 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/21/2020	Shriram Transport Finance co., Ltd., vs Ramchandar Dagam	09 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/35/2020	M/s. Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., Mancherial vs Kasipaka Prasad	09 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/41/2020	Shriram City Union Finance Limited rep by its General Power of Attorney Sri A. Mallikarjun vs Malleshwari Sammatham	09 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/3/2020	M/s. Shriram City ULnion Finance Ltd., Mancherial. vs Murugu Kumara Swamy	03 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/43/2020	Shriram City Union Finance Limited rep by its General Power of Attorney Sri A. Mallikarjun vs Padigala Naresh	03 Dec 2020	Order	—
EP/44/2020	Shriram City Union Finance Limited rep by its General Power of Attorney Sri A. Mallikarjun vs Chaitanya Kumar Madugula	03 Dec 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/169/2020	Velpula Pochaiah vs State through Police, Mancherial	03 Dec 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/170/2020	A1 Nenduguri Prashanth vs The State through Police, Chennur	03 Dec 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/157/2020	Bathula Lachanna vs PS Dandepally	02 Dec 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/164/2020	Durgama Rajababu vs The State of Telangana through Police, Jannaram	02 Dec 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/171/2020	A1 Nagapuri Prakash vs State of Telangana through SHO PS. Mancherial	02 Dec 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/163/2020	A1 Pendyala Nagalaxmi @ Vaishnavi vs The State of Telangana through SHO of PS, Mancherial	26 Nov 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/165/2020	A2. Abdul Gaffar, vs The State of Telangana through SHO, PS. Mancherial	26 Nov 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/166/2020	Shaik Irfan Ahmed vs The State of Telangana through SHO PS, Mancherial	26 Nov 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/167/2020	A5. Abdul Zuber vs The State of Telangana through SHO PS. Mancherial	26 Nov 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/168/2020	A7 Kalloya Dinesh vs The State of Telangana through SHO of PS, Mancherial	26 Nov 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/161/2020	Saru Sheshagiri vs The State of TS through SHO., PS. Naspur	20 Nov 2020	Order	—
SC/288/2016	The State of Telangana through police vs Jadi Bapu	19 Nov 2020	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/159/2020	Jangama Venkatesh vs The State of Telangana through SHO., PS. Mandamarri	19 Nov 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/160/2020	Chenna Pavan Kalyan vs The State of Telangana through P.S., Luxettipet	19 Nov 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/162/2020	Santhosham Raghuvaran vs The State of Telangana through SHO, PS. Jaipur	19 Nov 2020	Order	—
EP/8/2020	M/s. Shriram City ULnion Finance Ltd., Mancherial. vs Gouse Pasha Mohammed	17 Nov 2020	Order	—
EP/109/2019	Shriram City Union Finance Limited Rept. by its General Power of Attorney vs Betham Pranay deep	17 Nov 2020	Order	—
EP/110/2019	Shriram City Union Finance Limited Rept. by its General Power of Attorney vs Chinnaiah Juvva	17 Nov 2020	Order	—
EP/122/2019	Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. vs Raj Kumar Ravula	17 Nov 2020	Order	—
EP/124/2019	Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. vs Srinivas Manduva	17 Nov 2020	Order	—
EP/125/2019	Shriram Ciity Union Finance Ltd., Mancherial. vs Kotte Sridhar	17 Nov 2020	Order	—
EP/157/2019	M/s Edusmart Services Pvt.Ltd vs Sri Gouthama Budha Vidhyanikethan	17 Nov 2020	Order	—
EP/162/2019	Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., vs Prabhakar Goud Bommagani	17 Nov 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/150/2020	Undrala Posham vs State through SHO, Ps. Chennur	17 Nov 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/151/2020	Asadi Naresh vs The State of Telangana through PS. Jannaram	17 Nov 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/153/2020	Undrala Posham vs State through SHO, PS. Chennuru	17 Nov 2020	Order	—
SC/166/2019	The State of telangana through PS Mancherial. vs Uppu @ Anumula Sridhar	12 Nov 2020	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/147/2020	A2. Abdul Gaffar vs The State of Telangana through SHO, Ps. Mancherial	12 Nov 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/148/2020	Pendyala Nagalaxmi @ Vaishnavi vs The State of Telangana	12 Nov 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/149/2020	A7. Kalloya Dinesh vs The State of Telangana through PS. Mancherial	12 Nov 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/154/2020	Badri Sudhakar and 5 others vs PS Mandamarri	12 Nov 2020	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/156/2020	Dugine Jailu vs PS Mancherial	12 Nov 2020	Order	—
EP/5/2020	M/s. Shriram City ULnion Finance Ltd., Mancherial. vs Masuku Shankar	10 Nov 2020	Order	—

Showing 100 of 337 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Jan 2021		34
Dec 2020		110
Nov 2020		45
Oct 2020		19
Sep 2020		25
Aug 2020		26
Jul 2020		13
Jun 2020		11
May 2020		8
Apr 2020		10
Mar 2020		23
Feb 2020		23

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Sri. P. Narayana Babu handled?

Sri. P. Narayana Babu has handled 419 court orders since 2019 at Mancherial, PDJ Court Complex. The average disposal rate is 28 orders per month.

What types of cases does Sri. P. Narayana Babu hear?

Based on available records, Sri. P. Narayana Babu primarily handles Civil matters (Execution Petitions, Appeal Suits) and Criminal matters (Criminal Appeals, Sessions Cases) and Motor Accident matters (Motor Accident Claims) at Mancherial, PDJ Court Complex.

Where is Sri. P. Narayana Babu currently posted?

Sri. P. Narayana Babu is posted as Addl. District Judge (POCSO) at Mancherial, PDJ Court Complex, Mancherial, Telangana.

Are judgments by Sri. P. Narayana Babu available online?

Yes. 10 judgments by Sri. P. Narayana Babu are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Sri. P. Narayana Babu dispose cases?

Sri. P. Narayana Babu disposes approximately 28 cases per month, based on 419 orders handled over their tenure at Mancherial, PDJ Court Complex.

Since when is Sri. P. Narayana Babu serving?

Sri. P. Narayana Babu has been serving at Mancherial, PDJ Court Complex since 2019.

Case Types

CRLMP 42%

EP 29%

MVOP 8%

CRLA 7%

SC 5%

A 4%

CRLRP 2%

AS 2%

Posting History

Nov 2020 — Jan 2021

Addl. District Judge (POCSO) · 77 orders
Nov 2019 — Jan 2021

Addl. District Judge (POCSO) · 342 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Sri. A. Veeraiah

Prl. District and Sessions Judge, Mancherial

524 orders

Sri. Lalsingh Sreenivasa Naik

I Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Mancherial

568 orders

← View all judges at Mancherial, PDJ Court Complex