Sri P.Sivaram Prasad

1

IN THE COURT OF THE III ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS

MAGISTRATE, KAKINADA.

Date : 8-10-2016

C.C.29/2013

Tadi Venkata Krishna Reddy

and

Karrella Sreedhar

O R D E R

Referral order by Regular court: in CC.29/2013 Both parties filed joint memo requesting to refer the matter to Lok Adalat for amicable statement. In view of the joint memo filed by both parties and after hearing the submissions for the both sides, it is observed that there is every possibility of compromise between both parties if the matter is referred to Lok Adalat. Further the offence alleged against the accused is under sec. 138 NI Act. Hence, the case is compoundable one and there is no hurdle to record compromise before Lok Adalat. In view of the powers exercised under sec. 19 and 20 of Legal services Authority Act, I am inclined to refer this matter to Lok Adalat since both parties filed compromise petition and since both parties are ready for recording the terms of compromise and to dispose off the case as adjusted before Lok Adalat. Accordingly, this referral order is passed referring this matter to the Lok Adalat. Hence, this matter is referred to Lok Adalat being conducted today. Both parties are directed to attend before the Presiding Officer of the Lok Adalat. III AJFCM Both parties present. Both parties filed a joint memo requesting to refer the matter to the Lok Adalat. Accordingly the matter can be disposed off as adjusted before the lok Adalat. In view of the settlement between the both parties before Lok ADalat the award passed under sec. 20 of the Legal services authority act and the case is disposed off as adjusted before Lok Adalat Accused are acquitted U/sec.147 of NI Act for the offence U/sec.138 NI Act. Award is passed accordingly.under sec. 320(8) Cr.P.C.

Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 08th day of October,2016.

Sd/-

III ADDL.JUDL.MAGISTRATE

OF FIRST CLASS, KAKINADA.

1

IN THE COURT OF THE III ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS

MAGISTRATE, KAKINADA.

Date : 8-10-2016

C.C.6/2016

Korukonda MadhuBabu

and

Kunche Janakiramayya

O R D E R

Referral order by Regular court: in CC.06/2016 Both parties filed joint memo requesting to refer the matter to Lok Adalat for amicable statement. In view of the joint memo filed by both parties and after hearing the submissions for the both sides, it is observed that there is every possibility of compromise between both parties if the matter is referred to Lok Adalat. Further the offence alleged against the accused is under sec. 138 NI Act. Hence, the case is compoundable one and there is no hurdle to record compromise before Lok Adalat. In view of the powers exercised under sec. 19 and 20 of Legal services Authority Act, I am inclined to refer this matter to Lok Adalat since both parties filed compromise petition and since both parties are ready for recording the terms of compromise and to dispose off the case as adjusted before Lok Adalat. Accordingly, this referral order is passed referring this matter to the Lok Adalat. Hence, this matter is referred to Lok Adalat being conducted today. Both parties are directed to attend before the Presiding Officer of the Lok Adalat. III AJFCM Both parties present. Both parties filed a joint memo requesting to refer the matter to the Lok Adalat. Accordingly the matter can be disposed off as adjusted before the lok Adalat. In view of the settlement between the both parties before Lok ADalat the award passed under sec. 20 of the Legal services authority act and the case is disposed off as adjusted before Lok Adalat Accused are acquitted U/sec.147 of NI Act for the offence U/sec.138 NI Act. Award is passed accordingly under sec. 320(8) Cr.P.C.

Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 8th day of October,2016.

Sd/-

III ADDL.JUDL.MAGISTRATE

OF FIRST CLASS, KAKINADA.

1

IN THE COURT OF THE III ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS

MAGISTRATE, KAKINADA.

Date : 13-10-2016

C.C.234/2014

Gampala Srinivasa Rao AND Godi Kalpana

O R D E R

Both parties filed joint memo requesting to refer the matter to Lok Adalat for amicable statement. In view of the joint memo filed by both parties and after hearing the submissions for the both sides, it is observed that there is every possibility of compromise between both parties if the matter is referred to Lok Adalat. Further the offence alleged against the accused is under sec. 138 NI Act. Hence, the case is compoundable one and there is no hurdle to record compromise before Lok Adalat. In view of the powers exercised under sec.

19 and 20 of Legal services Authority Act, I am inclined to refer this matter to Lok Adalat since both parties filed compromise petition and since both parties are ready for recording the terms of compromise and to dispose off the case as adjusted before Lok Adalat.

Accordingly, this referral order is passed referring this matter to the Lok Adalat. Hence, this matter is referred to Lok Adalat being conducted today. Both parties are directed to attend before the Presiding Officer of the Lok Adalat. III AJFCM Both parties present.

Both parties filed a joint memo requesting to refer the matter to the Lok Adalat.

Accordingly the matter can be disposed off as adjusted before the lok Adalat. In view of the settlement between the both parties before Lok ADalat the award passed under sec. 20 of the Legal services authority act and the case is disposed off as adjusted before Lok Adalat

Accused are acquitted U/sec.147 of NI Act for the offence U/sec.138 NI Act. Award is passed accordingly under sec. 320(8) Cr.P.C.

Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 13th day of October,2016.

Sd/-

III ADDL.JUDL.MAGISTRATE

OF FIRST CLASS, KAKINADA.

1

IN THE COURT OF THE III ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS

MAGISTRATE, KAKINADA.

Date : 8-10-2016

C.C.104/2016

Sub-Inspector of Police, Pedapudi P.S

and

Rakurthi Baby

O R D E R

Both parties present. Both parties filed joint memo requesting to refer the matter to Lok

Adalat for amicable statement. Both parties are identified by K.Srinubabu P.C.657 of

Pedapudi Police Station. In view of the joint memo filed by both parties and after hearing the submissions for the both sides, it is observed that there is every possibility of compromise between both parties if the matter is referred to Lok Adalat. Further the offence alleged against the accused is under sec. 324 r/w 34 in to 324 r/w 34 IPC . So there is no hurdle in recording the terms of compromise and to dispose off the case as adjusted

before Lok Adalat. Accordingly, this referral order is passed referring this matter to the

Lok Adalat for amicable settlement. Hence, this matter is referred to Lok Adalat being conducted today. Both parties are directed to attend before the Presiding Officer of the Lok

Adalat Bench. III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class Both parties present. Both parties are identified by K.Srinubabu P.C.657 of Pedapudi Police Station Both parties filed a joint memo requesting to refer the matter to the Lok Adalat. Accordingly the matter can be disposed off as adjusted before the lok Adalat. In view of the settlement between the both parties before Lok ADalat the award passed under sec. 20 of the Legal services authority act and the case is disposed off as adjusted before Lok Adalat The accused in this case is acquitted for the offence under sec. 324 r/w 34 under sec. 320(8) Cr.P.C.

Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 8th day of October,2016.

Sd/-

III ADDL.JUDL.MAGISTRATE

OF FIRST CLASS, KAKINADA.

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

(MOBILE) FOR TRIAL OF CASES UNDER P.C.R ACT-CUM- VI

ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KAKINADA.

The 8th day of October, 2016

C.C.236/2016

Between:

S.I.of Police, Port PS Kakinada

...Complainant

And

Kaduri Sathi Babu-A.1 and 3 others ... Accused

O R D E R

Defacto complainant, A.1 to A.4 called present. Both parties filed memo stating that matter is settled out of court. Perused the record the alleged offence u/Sec. 448, 323, 509, 506 r/w 34 IPC is compoundable in nature.Hence this case suomotu advanced to this date i.e., 8-10-2016 and referred to National Lok Adalat. The Defacto Complainant present, A.1 to A.4 present and identified by the police. The case is settled before Lok Adalat. The offence alleged against the A.1 to A.4 u/Secs. 448, 323, 509, 506 r/w 34 IPC is compoundable petition Sec. 320-2 Cr.P.C. filed and allowed. A.1 to A.4 are acquitted u/Sec. 320-8 Cr.P.C. Award is passed accordingly.

Pronounced by me in the open court, this the 8th day of October,

2016.

Sd/-

Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class

(Mobile) For Trial of Cases Under P.C.R Act-

cum- VI Additional Junior Civil Judge,

Kakinada.