Sri Parvatapu Ravi

Prl. Junior Civil Judge

Godavarikhani - JCJ Court Complex · Peddapalli · Telangana

SRI PARVATAPU RAVI, Prl. Junior Civil Judge, is posted at Godavarikhani - JCJ Court Complex, Peddapalli, Telangana, India. 2,877 court orders on record since 2016. 30 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CC, STC, OS cases.

2,877

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

CC/25/2019 Acquitted

Pusala Lasya @ Krishnaveni vs Pusala Niranjana charry

07 Oct 2021

Page No. 1 of 8 CC No.25 of 2019

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL.JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF F.C.

: AT : GODAVARIKHANI.

PRESENT: Sri Parvatapu Ravi, Prl.Judl.Magistrate of First Class, Godavarikhani.

THURSDAY, ON THIS THE 07TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021

CALENDAR CASE No.25 of 2019

Between: The State through the SubInspector of Police, Police Station, Anthergaon (Crime No.50 of 2018) …Complainant

A N D

A1: Pusala Niranjana Chary S/o. Rangaiah chary, Aged 29 years,

A2: Pusala Rangaiah chary S/o. Lingaiah, Aged 55 years

A3: Pusala Ramadevi W/o. Rangaiah, Aged 50 years all are caste of Gold smith R/o.Neerukulla village …Accused No.1 to 3

This case is coming on 05.10.2021 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri N.Ravinder, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State and of Sri D.Gopal Reddy Advocate for Accused having been heard both sides and having stood over for consideration to this day, the Court made the following:

: : J U D G M E N T : :

The SubInspector of Police, Police Station, Anthergaon has filed charge sheet against the accused No.1 to 3 in Crime No.50 of 2018 for the offences punishable under sections 498A, 324 r/w 34 of IPC and section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

2.The brief facts of the case are that on 20.05.2018 at 1235 hours the complainant by name Pusala Lasya @ Krishnaveni came to the

Anthergaon Police station and lodged a report stating that her parents were solemnized her marriage with the accused No.1 as per their customs and also gave net cash of Rs.2,70,000/, 4 tulas of gold and

Page No. 2 of 8 CC No.25 of 2019

other house hold articles towards dowry. After their marriage, they led happy marital life for a period of three months. After that her husband/A1, her inlaws/A2 & A3 and her sisterinlaws by name

Swapna and Aparna were harassed her mentally and physically to bring additional dowry of Rs.1,00,000/ and dressing table and also blaming her that she is not conceiving. Due to unbearable harassment meted by them, she informed the same to her parents and her brothers. In this regard a panchayath was held in the presence of their caste elders in which the accused persons promised that they will look after her well and took her along with them. On 19.05.2018 in view of their marriage day, her husband came to her parent’s house in intoxication condition and again harassed her by abusing her in filthy language demanding her to bring additional dowry and beat her with stick as a result, she sustained injuries. In this regard, she went to the Police station and lodged a report against them.

3. Basing on the complaint, the Asst.SubInspector of Police/LW9,

PS Anthergaon has registered a case in Crime No.50 of 2018 for the offences under sections 498A, 324 r/w 34 of IPC and section 4 of

Dowry Prohibition Act and took up the investigation. During the course of investigation he examined and recorded the statement of

LW1 and referred her to Government Area hospital Godavarikhani for treatment and for Medical certificate. Subsequently, LW10/Sub

Inspector of Police took up the investigation and found it to be on correct lines. Then, LW10 secured the presence of LW1, examined her, on examination, she reiterated the same facts as earlier stated

Page No. 3 of 8 CC No.25 of 2019

before LW9 as such, he did not record her statement. Later, he

secured the presence of LWs.2 to 4 by name Mamilapalli

Somanarsaiah, Adicherla Ramu and Chinthala Prasanna, examined and recorded their statements and collected marriage photos of LW1 from her. On 23.05.2018 the accused No.1 has surrendered before

LW10 and voluntarily confessed to have committed the offence, Then,

LW10 served section 41A Cr.PC notice on the accused No.1. Later, on 30.05.2018 LW10 visited the Neerukulla village and secured the presence of LW5 who is the neighbour of the accused persons, examined and recorded his statement. Again on 10.06.2018 LW10 visited the Neerukulla village and secured the presence of LWs.6 & 7 who are the neighbours of the accused persons, examined and recorded their statements. As per the statements of LWs.5 to 7, they stated that the accused No.1 to 3 only harassed the complainant mentally and physically to bring additional dowry but they did not saw the said Swapna and Aparna were harassed LW1. Later, LW10 filed a requisition before the A.C.P Godavarikhani with a request to accord permission to charge the case against the accused No.1 to 3 only by deleting the names of the accused No.4 & 5. On 07.09.2018 on the transfer of LW10, LW11/SI of Police assumed charge and took the CD file from LW10 and verified the investigation done by him and found it to be on correct lines. Later, LW11 obtained permission from ACP, Peddapalli vide C.No.702/ACPGDK/2018

dated 29.09.2018 to file charge sheet against the accused No.1 to 3

only by deleting the names of accused No.4 and 5. Then LW11 served section 41A Cr.PC notices on the accused No.2 and 3.

Page No. 4 of 8 CC No.25 of 2019

Subsequently, LW11 met the LW8 who gave treatment to LW1 and obtained Medical certificate in which LW1 sustained injuries which are simple in nature. After completion of the investigation, he filed charge sheet against Accused No.1 to 3 for the offences under sections 498A, 324 r/w 34 of IPC and section 4 of Dowry Prohibition

Act.

4.Cognizance was taken for the offences punishable under sections 498A, 324 r/w 34 of IPC and section 4 of Dowry Prohibition

Act against the accused No.1 to 3 and numbered as CC No.25 of 2019.

5.On appearance of the accused, copies of documents were furnished to them as required under Sec.207 Cr.P.C.

6.The accused No.1 to 3 were examined under Sec.239 Cr.P.C and they denied the allegation levelled against them. Hence, charges under sections 498A, 324 r/w 34 of IPC and section 4 of Dowry

Prohibition Act were framed, read over and explained to the accused in vernacular. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

7.The prosecution has examined PW1 to PW7 and got marked

Ex.P1 to Ex.P10. PW1 is the complainant and victim. PW2 to PW 4 are the relatives of LW1. PW5 is the neighbour of LW1. PW6 is the nieghbour of the accused No.1 to 3. PW7 is the SubInspector of the Police and the Investigating officer.

Page No. 5 of 8 CC No.25 of 2019

8.After closure of prosecution side evidence, the accused No.1 to 3 were examined under Section 313 of Cr.P.C., with reference to the incriminating evidence found against them in the testimony of the prosecution witnesses. He denied the same, reported no defence evidence.

9.Now the point for consideration is:

Whether the prosecution has proved the guilt of the accused beyond all reasonable doubts for the offences punishable U/Secs.498A, 324 r/w 34 IPC and section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act?

10.It is the case of the prosecution that the accused No.1 being the husband of the defacto complainant and accused No.2 & 3 being the parents of A1, harassed PW1 and demanded her to bring additional dowry of Rs.1,00,000/. On 19.05.2018 in view of marriage day of

PW1 and the accused No.1, the A1 came to the parent’s house of

PW1 in intoxication condition and again harassed her by abusing her in filthy language demanding to bring additional dowry and beat her with stick as a result, PW1 sustained injuries.

11.PW1 who is the complainant and victim deposed that the accused No.1 is her husband. A2 to A3 are her inlaws. On 19.05.2017 her marriage was solemnized with the accused No.1 at

Anthergaon village as per the cast and customs prevailed in her community. At the time of marriage, her parents fulfilled all formalities prevailed in their community. After 5 months of her marriage, there were some domestic disputes arose between them as such, she informed to her brothers about the disputes who took her to the Anthergaon P.S where they requested the Police to give

Page No. 6 of 8 CC No.25 of 2019

counseling to her husband and her inlaws for which the Police obtained her signature on some papers but she do not know its contents.

12.PW2 and PWs4 to 6 who are the relatives and neighbuors of the PW1 and accused deposed that they do not know anything about the facts of the case and that the police never examined them and not recorded their statements.

13.PW3 who is the relative of PW1 deposed that about 3 years ago one panchayath was conducted at Anthergaon Police station regarding the disputes in the family of the accused and PW1, except that he do not know anything about the facts of this case. About two months ago, another panchayath was held wherein he also participated and PW1 and the accused decided to take divorce after exchanging the articles and properties belongs to both of them, after that he came to know that they took customary divorce and executed a divorce deed which was notarized. Police never examined him and never recorded his statement.

14.PW7 who is the SubInspect of the Police and the Investigating officer deposed about the investigation done by him and also his predecessors in this case.

15.On careful perusal of evidence on record, it is clear that the defacto complainant/PW1, her relatives and the neighbours/ PWs.2 to 6 who are the material witnesses have turned hostile, and did not support the case of the prosecution, at the request of the learned

Page No. 7 of 8 CC No.25 of 2019

A.P.P, they were declared hostile. However, in their crossexamination by the learned A.P.P, no worthwhile material could be elicited involving the complicity of the accused in the offence, except marking the portions in their 161 Cr.PC statements as Ex.P2 to Ex.P7.

16.Now the only evidence that remains on record for consideration is that of PW7 who is the SubInspector of Police and the

Investigating officer who deposed about the investigation done by him and his predecessors in this case. The evidence of Investigating officer will be relevant and useful for consideration, when there is a positive evidence of the material witnesses. As stated above, the defacto complainant/PW.1, her relatives and the neighbours/ PWs.2 to 6 have turned hostile and did not support the case of the prosecution. In the absence of crucial evidence of victim/PW1 and her relatives and the neighbours/ PWs.2 to 6 , it is nothing but a futile exercise to discuss about the case since, the prosecution case will not improve in any manner by discussing the same. As such, this court is left with no other option except, to acquit the accused.

17.For the foregoing reasons, the prosecution has miserably failed to bring home the guilt of the accused No.1 to 3 beyond all reasonable doubts for the offences punishable U/Sec.498A, 324 r/w 34 IPC and section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and thereby, the accused No.1 to 3 are entitled for an acquittal. Accordingly, the point is answered.

Page No. 8 of 8 CC No.25 of 2019

18. In the result, the Accused No.1 to 3 are found not guilty for the offences punishable U/Sec.498A, 324 r/w 34 IPC and section 4 of

Dowry Prohibition Act and they are acquitted U/Sec.248(1) Cr.P.C.

for the above said charges. The bail bonds of the accused shall remain in force for a period of six months.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer GradeIII, corrected and

pronounced by me in open Court on this the 07th day of October, 2021.

Prl.Judl.Magistrate of F.C., Godavarikhani.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR THE PROSECUTION: FOR THE DEFENCE:

PW1 – Pusala Lasya Nil PW2 – Adicherla Ramu PW3 – Chinthala Prasanna PW4 – Burra Srinivas PW5 – Kalvala Mallaiah PW6 Pallerla Ellamma PW7 K.Ramakrishna

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR THE PROSECUTION:

Ex.P1 – Signature of PW1 on complaint Ex.P2 – 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of PW1 Ex.P3 – 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of PW2 Ex.P4 – 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of PW3 Ex.P5 – 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of PW4 Ex.P6 – 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of PW5 Ex.P7 – 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of PW6 Ex.P8 – is the report lodged by PW1 Ex.P9 – is the First Information Report Ex.P10 – is the Medical certificate of PW1.

FOR THE DEFENCE: Nil

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

Nil

Prl.Judl.Magistrate of F.C., Godavarikhani.

CC/109/2018 Acquitted

Godishela Bhagyalaxmi vs Godishela Praveen

08 Oct 2021

CC No.109 of 2018 Page No.1 of 7

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL.JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF F.C.

: AT : GODAVARIKHANI.

PRESENT: Sri Parvatapu Ravi Prl.Judl.Magistrate of First Class. Godavarikhani.

FRIDAY, ON THIS THE 08TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021

CALENDAR CASE No.109 of 2018

Between: The State through the SubInspector of Police, Police Station, Anthergaon (Crime No.48 of 2018) …Complainant

A N D

Godishala Praveen S/o.Venkataiah, Aged 30 years, Madiga, R/o.Murmur village …Sole Accused

This case is coming on 04.10.2021 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri N.Ravinder, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State and of Sri Purma Srinivas Advocate for Accused having been heard both sides and having stood over for consideration to this day, the Court made the following:

: : J U D G M E N T : :

The SubInspector of Police, Police Station, Anthergaon filed charge sheet against the sole accused in Crime No.48 of 2018 for the offences punishable under sections 498A and 324 of IPC.

2.The brief facts of the case are that on 11.05.2018 at 1700 hours the complainant by name Godishala Bhagyalaxmi came to the

Anthergaon Police station and lodged a complaint stating that about five years ago, her marriage was performed with the accused. After their marriage, they led happy marital life for a period of one year.

Out of their wedlock, she blessed with a female child since then, her husband subjected her to cruelty, beat her with hands and abused her in filthy language in intoxication condition regularly. In this

CC No.109 of 2018 Page No.2 of 7

regard, so many times their elders were convinced and warned the accused to change his attitude but he did not change his attitude. By keeping in mind the future of their daughter she bared his harassment till today. In the last month, due to unbearable harassment meted out by the accused, she went to her parent’s house at Ramunur along with her daughter. Two days back she went to

Maddiryala village to attend her cousin brother marriage and stayed there. Then, her husband also came there to attend the said marriage.

On 11.05.2018 at 1500 hours when PW1 and her sisterinlaw by name Mulkala Shailaja were standing at Maddiryala Bus stand to proceed to her parent’s house, then her husband came to her and abused her in filthy language and beat her with stick and kicked her with his legs. On seeing the incident one Kalepalli Venkatesh and

Mulkala Suma and the villagers who were present there came there and rescued her.

3.Basing on the complaint, LW9/SubInspector of Police, PS

Anthergaon has registered a case in Crime No.48/2018 for the offences punishable under sections 498A and 324 of IPC and took up the investigation. During the course of investigation, he examined and recorded the statement of LW1 and referred her to Government

Area hospital, Godavarikhani for treatment and for Medical

Certificate. Subsequently, he visited the scene of offence, secured the presence of Lws.2 to 5 by name Kusanapalli Shankaramma, Mulkala

Shailaja, K.Venkatesh and Mulkala Suma and recorded their statements and also secured the presence of Lws.6 & 7 by name

Chilukuri Bhaskar and Katukuri Sailu as panchas observed the scene

CC No.109 of 2018 Page No.3 of 7

of offence minutely and found no incriminating materials and drew rough sketch of scene of offence in crime details form in their presence. On 13.05.2018 at 1100 hours LW9 apprehended the accused at his house situated at Murmur village and interrogated him. During the interrogation, the accused voluntarily confessed to have committed the offence and further confessed that the stick used by him in the commission of offence was thrown away somewhere in angry mood. Then, LW9 brought the accused to the Police station at 1200 hours and served 41A Cr.PC notice upon the accused with instructions to appear before the Hon’ble Court whenever summons will be received from the Court. Subsequently, LW9 consulted LW8 who treated the LW1 for Medical certificate, on that LW8 issued

Medical certificate of LW1 showing that LW1 sustained injuries which are simple in nature. After completion of investigation, he filed the charge sheet against the accused for the offences punishable under sections 498A and 324 of IPC.

4.Cognizance was taken for the offences punishable under sections 498A and 324 of IPC against the accused and numbered as

CC No.109 of 2018.

5.On appearance of the accused, copies of documents were furnished to him as required under Sec.207 Cr.P.C.

6.The accused was examined under section 239 Cr.P.C and he denied the allegation levelled against him. Hence, charges under sections 498A and 324 of IPC were framed, read over and explained to the accused in vernacular. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

CC No.109 of 2018 Page No.4 of 7

7.The prosecution has examined PW1 & PW2 and got marked

Ex.P1 to Ex.P3. PW1 is the complainant and victim. PW2 is the mother of PW1. The learned A.P.P given up the evidence of remaining listed witnesses i.e. LWs.3 to 8. The evidence of LW9 who is the

SubInspector of the Police has closed by this Court as the police failed to serve notice on the LW9 inspite of passing of conditional order by this Court.

8.Since there is no incriminating material available in the evidence of prosecution witnesses, the examination of accused

U/Sec.313 Cr.P.C. is dispensed with.

9.Now the point for consideration is:

Whether the prosecution has proved the guilt of the accused beyond all reasonable doubt for the offences

punishable under sections 498A and 324 IPC ?

10.It is the case of the prosecution that the accused being the husband of the defacto complainant subjected her to cruelty beat her with hands and abused her in filthy language in intoxication condition regularly. Due to unbearable harassment meted out by the accused, the defacto complainant along with her daughter came to her parents house and living with them. After attending the marriage of her cousin at Maddiryala village, on 11.05.2018 at 1500 hours

PW1 and her sistersinlaw by name Mulkala Shailaja were standing at Maddiryala Bus stand to proceed to her parent’s house, then her husband came to her and abused her in filthy language and beat her with stick and kicked her with his legs.

CC No.109 of 2018 Page No.5 of 7

11.Now we will carefully scrutinize the evidence of prosecution witnesses so as to determine whether the prosecution proved the guilt of the accused beyond all reasonable doubts for the offences punishable under sections 498A and 324 of IPC. PW1 by name

Godishala Bhagyalaxmi who is the complainant and victim deposed that about six years ago, her marriage was performed with the accused at Ramnur village of Velgatur mandal as per the customs prevailed in Christian religion. During their wedlock they were blessed with one girl child. She was aged about 03 years on the date of lodging of the report. Thereafter, some domestic disputes arose between them as such, she went to the PS and requested the police to give counselling to her husband, there, the Police obtained her signature on some papers. Except that she do not know anything about the facts of the case.

12.PW2 by name K.Shankaramma who is the mother of PW1 deposed that about seven years ago, the marriage of PW1 was performed with the accused at Ramnur village of Velgatur mandal as per the customs prevailed in Chirstian religion. During their wedlock they were blessed with one girl child. Thereafter, some domestic disputes arose between them as such, PW1 went to the PS and requested the police to give counselling to her husband. Except that she do not know anything about the facts of the case.

13.On careful perusal of evidence on record, it is clear that the defacto complainant/PW1, her mother/PW2 who are the material witnesses have turned hostile and did not support the case of the

CC No.109 of 2018 Page No.6 of 7

prosecution, at the request of the learned A.P.P, they were declared hostile. However, in their crossexamination by the learned A.P.P, no worthwhile material could be elicited involving the complicity of the accused in the offence, except marking the portions in their 161

Cr.PC statements as Ex.P2 & Ex.P3.

14.Since the defacto complainant and victim (PW1) herself and her mother/PW2 did not support the case of prosecution, the learned

A.P.P has given up the evidence of other listed circumstantial witnesses, on the ground that examining them will serve no useful purpose and it will be a futile exercise and mere waste of the precious time of the Court. The evidence of LW9 who is the Sub

Inspector of the Police has closed by this Court as the police failed to serve notice on the LW9 in spite of passing conditional order by this

Court. Further, on perusal of the prosecution case and the evidence of PW1 & PW2 it is clear that PW1 and accused filed a divorce petition before Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge's Court at Peddapalli. In the absence of crucial evidence of victim, it is nothing but a futile exercise to discuss about the case since, the prosecution case will not improve in any manner by discussing the same. As such, this court is left with no other option except, to acquit the accused.

15.For the foregoing reasons, the prosecution has miserably failed to bring home the guilt of the accused beyond all reasonable doubts for the offences punishable U/Sec.498A and 324 of IPC and thereby, the accused is entitled for an acquittal. Accordingly, the point is answered.

CC No.109 of 2018 Page No.7 of 7

16. In the result, the Accused is found not guilty for the offences punishable U/Sec.498A and 324 IPC and he is acquitted

U/Sec.248(1) Cr.P.C. for the above said charges. The bail bonds of the accused shall remain in force for a period of six months.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer GradeIII, corrected and

pronounced by me in open Court on this the 08th day of October, 2021.

Sd/ Prl.Judl.Magistrate of F.C., Godavarikhani.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR THE PROSECUTION: FOR THE DEFENCE:

PW1 – Godishala Bhagyalaxmi Nil PW2 – K.Shankaramma

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR THE PROSECUTION:

Ex.P1 – is the signature of PW1 on Report Ex.P2 – is the 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of PW1 Ex.P3 – is the 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of PW2

FOR THE DEFENCE: Nil

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

Nil

Sd/ Prl.Judl.Magistrate of F.C., Godavarikhani.

OS/65/2019

PARSAVENI SADANANDAM vs SALPALA KUMARASWAMY

10 Jan 2020

1 OS No.65 of 2019

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

: AT : GODAVARIKHANI

Present:Sri.P.Ravi II-Addl. Junior Civil Judge, FAC: Prl.Junior Civil Judge, Godavarikhani.

FRIDAY, ON THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2020

ORIGINAL SUIT No.65 of 2019

Between: Parshaveni Sadanandam S/o.Pochamallu, Age 30 years, Occupation Private Employee, R/o.H.No.11- 7/421/377. Santhosh Nagar, 8 Incline colony, Ramagundam mandal of Peddapalli District, Telangana State. …Plaintif

AND

Salpala Kumara Swamy S/o.Kankaiah, Age 30 years, Occupation Business, R/o.Sukkararampet village, Near Government School, Post Lakkaram, Mutharam mandal of Peddapally District. … Defendant

This suit is coming on 07.01.2020 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri.G.Bhoomaiah Advocate for plaintif and the defendant set ex-parte the matter having been heard and having stood over till this day for consideration, this Court delivered the following :-

:: J U D G E M E N T ::

This is a suit filed for recovery of an amount of Rs.2,70,000/- (Rupees Two lakhs and Seventy thousand only) from the defendant basing on promissory note.

2.It is averred in the plaint that the plaintif and the defendant are well acquainted with each other as they are classmates since primary education and also family friends and out of said acquaintance, on 07.04.2016 the defendant came to the house of the plaintif to arrange hand loan amount of Rs.2,00,000/- for his business development. The plaintif considering the request of the defendant and gave an amount of 2 OS No.65 of 2019

Rs.2,00,000/- to the defendant on 21.04.2016. After receipt of the said amount from the plaintif, the defendant executed a promissory note in favour of the plaintif agreed to repay interest @ 1.00% per month with a promise to repay the said loan amount along with interest as and when demanded by the plaintif. After some days, the plaintif has demanded the defendant to repay the borrowed amount along with interest, but the defendant postponed the same by one or the other reasons. Finally, the plaintif got issued a legal notice to the defendant on 11.08.2017, but the defendant refused to take the said legal notice. Hence the suit.

3.After numbering the suit, notice was issued to the defendant, the same is served on the father of the defendant and as such, it is deemed as served and the defendant called absent and no representation. Hence, the defendant is set exparte.

4.On behalf of plaintif, the plaintif himself is examined as PW1 got marked Ex.A1 to Ex.A-4 on his behalf.

5.Heard the counsel for plaintif.

6.Perused the record.

7. Now the point for determination

Whether the plaintiff is entitled for suit amount as prayed for?

8.To prove its case, the plaintif himself is examined as PW1 and he reiterated the contents of his plaint in his chief examination. In support of his case, he relied on Ex.A1 to Ex.A-4. Ex.A-1 is the original promissory note executed by the defendant dated 21.04.2016. Ex.A-2 is the office copy of legal notice dated 11.08.2017. Ex.A-3 is the postal receipt of the legal notice dated 11.08.2017 and Ex.A-4 is the Return Acknowledgment Refused by defendant dated 17.08.2017. On perusal of Ex.A1 is the promissory note 3 OS No.65 of 2019 which is proving that the defendant has borrowed hand loan of

Rs.2,00,000/- from the plaintif and when he failed to pay the said amount, the plaintif got issued Ex.A2 Legal Notice, but even then also the defendant did not pay the amount. Hence, from the evidence of Pw1 coupled with the documents under Ex.A1 to A4 it is established that the plaintif gave a hand loan to the defendant, but the defendant failed to repay the same to the plaintif and as such, the defendant is liable to repay the amount to the plaintif. Further, the evidence of Pw1 and Ex.A1 to A4 remained unchallenged and unrebutted by the defendant. Hence, the suit claim proved. Accordingly the point is answered.

9.IN THE RESULT, the suit of the plaintif is decreed with costs against the defendant for an amount of Rs.2,70,000/- (Rupees Two lakhs and Seventy thousand only) with future interest @ 6% per annum on

principal amount i.e., Rs.2,00,000/- from the date of filing of the suit till

the date of realization of the suit amount.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer Grade-III directly on Computer, corrected and pronounced by me in the Open Court on this the 10th day of January, 2020.

II-ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GODAVARIKHANI.

FAC: PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GODAVARIKHANI.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR THE PLAINTIFF(s): FOR THE DEFENDANT(s):

PW1 – Parshaveni Sadanandam- Nil - 4 OS No.65 of 2019

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR THE PLAINTIFF(s):

Ex.A-1 is the original promissory note executed by the defendant

dated 21.04.2016.

Ex.A-2 is the office copy of legal notice dated 11.08.2017.

Ex.A-3 is the postal receipt of the legal notice dated 11.08.2017

Ex.A-4 is the Return Acknowledgment Refused by defendant dated 17.08.2017

FOR THE DEFENDANT(s):

- Nil -

II-ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GODAVARIKHANI.

FAC: PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GODAVARIKHANI.

OS/111/2021

duvva Poshalu vs Thipparaveni Laxmi

05 Oct 2021

Page No.1 of 4 OS No.111 of 2021

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

: AT : GODAVARIKHANI

Present:Sri.Parvatapu Ravi. Prl.Junior Civil Judge, Godavarikhani.

TUESDAY, ON THIS THE 05TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021

ORIGINAL SUIT No.111 of 2021

Between: Duvva Poshalu @ Pochalu S/o.Ramadasu, Aged 66 years, Occupation Retired SCCL employee, R/o.Q.No.D137, beside Shed, Gandhi Nagar, Godavarikhani Post, Peddapalli District, Presently residing at Gangaram village of Kalva Srirampur mandal in Peddapalli District.

…Plaintiff

AND

Smt.Thipparaveni Laxmi W/o.Vaikuntum R/o.Q.No.D137, Gandhi Nagar, Godavarikhani Post, Peddapalli District.

… Defendant

This suit is coming on 04.10.2021 for final hearing before me in the presence of Smt.M.Sandhya Rani Advocate for plaintiff and the defendant set exparte the matter having been heard and having stood over till this day for consideration, this Court delivered the following :

: J U D G E M E N T :

This is a suit filed for recovery of an amount of Rs.1,16,600/ (Rupees One lakh Sixteen thousand and six hundred only) from the defendant basing on the promissory note.

2.It is averred in the plaint that the plaintiff and the defendant are known to each other since ten years and out of said acquaintance, the defendant borrowed a hand loan of Rs.1,10,000/ on 05.01.2021 towards her family necessities and executed a promissory note in favour of the plaintiff at the house of the plaintiff i.e., Q.No.D137 beside shed, Gandhi

Page No.2 of 4 OS No.111 of 2021

Nagar, Godavarikhani in the presence of Marelli Raji Reddy and Nimmathi

Gattaiah, Kudi Sarothama Reddy and Koppula Swamy and among them

Marelli Raji Reddy and Koppula Swamy have signed on the pronote as witnesses. Further, the defendant promised to repay the said loan amount as and when demanded by the plaintiff. Thereafter, the plaintiff several times requested the defendant to repay the loan amount but the defendant postponed the same by one or the other reasons, on that the plaintiff got issued legal notice to the defendant on 03.05.2021 and the same was returned as “Intimation delivered unclaimed, hence returned to sender”.

Therefore, the defendant is knowingfully avoiding the payment to the plaintiff with ulterior motive. Having no other alternative, the plaintiff filed the present suit.

3.After receipt of summons, the defendant did not choose to appear

before this court as such, the defendant is set exparte.

4.In order to prove his case, the plaintiff himself was examined as PW1 and got marked Ex.A1 to Ex.A4.

5.Heard the counsel for plaintiff.

6.Perused the record.

7. Now the point for determination is :

Whether the plaintiff is entitled for suit amount as prayed for?

8.To prove its case, the plaintiff himself is examined as PW1 and he reiterated the contents of his plaint in his chief examination. In support of his case, he relied on Ex.A1 to Ex.A4. Ex.A1 is the Original Promissory note dated 05.01.2021. Ex.A2 is the Office copy of legal notice dated

Page No.3 of 4 OS No.111 of 2021

03.05.2021. Ex.A3 is the Postal receipt dated 03.05.2021. Ex.A4 is the

Returned envelop cover with acknowledgment due. On perusal of Ex.A1 which is the promissory note it is proving that the defendant has borrowed hand loan of Rs.1,10,000/ from the plaintiff and when she failed to repay the said amount the plaintiff got issued Ex.A2 Legal Notice, but even then also the defendant did not pay the loan amount. Hence, from the evidence of Pw1 coupled with the document under Ex.A1 to A4 it is established that the plaintiff gave a hand loan to the defendant, but the defendant failed to repay the same to the plaintiff and as such, the defendant is liable to repay the amount to the plaintiff. Further, the evidence of Pw1 and Ex.A1 to A4 remained unchallenged and unrebutted by the defendant. Hence, the suit claim proved. Accordingly the point is answered.

9.IN THE RESULT, the suit of the plaintiff is decreed with costs against the defendant for an amount of Rs.1,16,600/ (Rupees One lakh

Sixteen thousand and six hundred only) with future interest @ 6% per annum on principal amount of Rs.1,10,000/ from the date of filing of the suit till the date of realization of the suit amount.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer GradeIII, corrected and

pronounced by me in the Open Court on this the 05th day of October,

2021.

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GODAVARIKHANI.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR THE PLAINTIFF(s): FOR THE DEFENDANT(s):

PW1 – Duvva Poshalu @ Pochalu Nil

Page No.4 of 4 OS No.111 of 2021

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR THE PLAINTIFF(s):

Ex.A1Is the Original Promissory note dated 05.01.2021

Ex.A2Is the Office copy of legal notice dated 03.05.2021 Ex.A3Is the Postal receipt dated 03.05.2021

Ex.A4Is the Returned envelop cover with acknowledgment due.

FOR THE DEFENDANT(s):

Nil

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GODAVARIKHANI.

CC/159/2019 Convicted

The State through SHO PS - Godavarikhani I-town vs Lambu Jaganmohan Reddy - A1

14 Mar 2019

FAIR ORDER

IN THE COURT OF THE IADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ::AT::

GODAVARIKHANI

PRESENT: P. RAVI,

IIAddl. Judl. Magistrate of F.CCum Junior Civil Judge, FAC: IAddl. Judl. Magistrate of F.C., Godavarikhani

Thursday on this the 14 th day of March2019

C.C. No. 159 of 2019

Between: The State through Station House Officer, Police Station: Godavarikhani Itown in (Crime No. 492/2018) … Complainant

AND

A.1Lambu Jaganmohan Reddy s/o Venkat reddy, age 54 yrs, Reddy, RTC driver of GDK depot, r/o H.No. 4527, NTPC of Annapurna colony, Ramagundam mdl; A.2More Bakkaiah s/oLingaiah, age 50 yrs, SCMadiga, Occ:RTC conductor in GDK Depot, r/o H.No. G38, Ramagundam Bcolony; A3Kotha Laxman s/o Anjaiah, age 42 yrs, M.Kapu, Occ: LIC agent, r/o H.No. 7139/15, G.M. Colony, Godavarikhani; A4Adepu Ravi s/o Rajaiah, age 43 yrs, Padmashali, Occ: Auto driver, r/o H.No. 21263/A, Markandeya colony, Godavarikhani.

… Accused No. 1 to 4. For the offence u/sec. 4 of Telangana Gaming Act.,

:: DOCKET O R D E R ::

A.1 to A.4 are produced through police Godavarikhani Itown at 03.30 pm., along with the charge sheet. Copies served on the accused and they pleaded no ill treatment in the hands of the police. Accusation well founded for an offence u/sec. 4 of Telangana Gaming Act., The accused submitted that they are poor labour and expressed readiness for examination in the matter. Hence, the office is directed to check the charge sheet forthwith and place the same on the bench today itself. Police to keep the accused in their custody till the matter is called on Bench today. Perused the record. The chargesheet is taken on file against all the accused for the offence u/sec. 4 of Telangana Gaming Act., A.1 to A.4 are examined u/sec. 251 of Cr.PC and the accusation for the offence u/sec. 4 of Telangana Gaming Act., is read over and explained to them, for which they voluntarily pleaded guilty and sought to take a lenient view in imposing sentence.

: 2

Since, the accused admitted their guilt voluntarily and in view of the facts and the circumstances of the case, I found the plea of the accused a voluntary one and in my view it is a fit case to take a lenient view in imposing sentence.

In the result, I found the accused No.1 to 4 guilty for the offence u/sec. 4 of Telangana Gaming Act., and are convicted u/sec. 252 Cr.PC and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 500/ each (Rupees five hundred only) for the said offence and in default of payment of fine, they shall suffer a simple imprisonment for a period of ONE month each for the said offence. The unmarked case property of Rs. 19,150/ (Rupees nineteen thousand one hundred and fifty only) shall be confiscated to the state forthwith. The other unmarked case property ie., (52) playing cards shall be destroyed forthwith. Total fine amount of Rs. 2,000/. (Rupees two thousand only).

Typed to my dictation by the typist directly on computer, corrected and pronounced by me on this the 14 th day of March2019.

IIAddl. Junior Civil JudgeCum

Judl. Magistrate of F.C.,

FAC: IAddl. JMFC, Godavarikhani

Order Record 2,802 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
CC/109/2018	Godishela Bhagyalaxmi vs Godishela Praveen	08 Oct 2021	Judgement	Acquitted
CC/25/2019	Pusala Lasya @ Krishnaveni vs Pusala Niranjana charry	07 Oct 2021	Judgement	Acquitted
EP/55/2021	saradhi chits pvt.ltd. Represented by authorised person Mr.Mothe.Devender Reddy vs Vskaitha Srinivas	05 Oct 2021	Order	—
OS/111/2021	duvva Poshalu vs Thipparaveni Laxmi	05 Oct 2021	Judgement	—
CC/624/2020	State of telangana vs Jangiti Praveen	04 Oct 2021	Order	—
EP/70/2018	Chetana Sony vs Nune Jayasree	30 Sep 2021	Order	—
EP/71/2018	Chetana Sony vs Nune Ganga Raju	30 Sep 2021	Order	—
EP/51/2021	Margadarsi Chit Funds Pvt Ltd,Branch Manager D.Umapathi vs Rodda Shankar	28 Sep 2021	Order	—
EP/53/2021	Margadarshi chit fund pvt ltd. branch manager D.Umapathi vs Maggidi sagar	28 Sep 2021	Order	—
CC/336/2017	GDK II T Ragula Chandraiah vs Jonglti Praveen	27 Sep 2021	Order	—
EP/6/2021	M/s Shriram Chits Pvt M/r K. Srinivas vs Nagunuri Venkataramana	22 Sep 2021	Order	—
OS/97/2021	Gadadasu Pochalu vs Jakkula mallaiah	22 Sep 2021	Order	—
EP/26/2019	Uppu Venkatesham vs Barigilla Prathaop	15 Sep 2021	Order	—
OS/120/2021	Mukkera Posham vs Odela Surender	11 Sep 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/172/2021	State of telangana vs Bemjbadi Rajendra Prasad @Bembadi Rajendra Prasad	11 Sep 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/199/2019	KANDE LINGAIAH vs UDURUKOTA RAJANARSU	11 Sep 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/316/2021	State of telangana vs Anaparthy Rajaiah	11 Sep 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/401/2021	State of telangana vs Boddu Mahesh	11 Sep 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/416/2021	State of telangana vs Boyapothu komuraiah	11 Sep 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/417/2021	State of telangana vs Boyapothu Rayamallu	11 Sep 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/477/2021	State of telangana vs Potta Sagar	11 Sep 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/478/2021	State of telangana vs Boddula Srinivas	11 Sep 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/479/2021	State of telangana vs Vsdussa laxman	11 Sep 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/482/2021	State of telangana vs Chiluka LIngaiah	11 Sep 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/615/2019	Vanku Lothu Pavan vs Satharaju Balakrishan	11 Sep 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
DVC/23/2021	Rudrarapu Rajeshwari vs Rudrarapu Ramesh	11 Sep 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
OS/23/2020	Vemula sridhar vs The General Manager SBH	09 Sep 2021	Judgement	—
CC/570/2020	State of telangana vs Kanchumurthy Ravi Charan	09 Sep 2021	Order	—
CC/2000202/2016	SHO, RAMAGUNDAM P.S. vs THUNIKI ILAIAH - A1	09 Sep 2021	Judgement	—
OS/87/2019	ERUVAKA RAJANNA vs ERUVAKA JAGGAMMA	08 Sep 2021	Judgement	—
CC/497/2021	Md.Gouse(PS Anthergaon) vs Doggala Prabhakar	08 Sep 2021	Order	—
CC/572/2020	State of telangana vs Gummula Shankar	07 Sep 2021	Order	—
CC/12/2018	Dulugunti Sravathi vs Avula Mallesh	06 Sep 2021	Judgement	—
CC/838/2019	Chinnala Sai Kumar vs Gandham Raj kumar	03 Sep 2021	Order	—
OS/88/2018	Karru @Midivell Laxmi vs Karru Gouramma	02 Sep 2021	Order	—
OS/95/2021	Mamidi Kumar vs Md Waheed	27 Aug 2021	Judgement	—
CC/521/2014	GODAVARIKHANI II vs GUGULOTH CHANDYANAYAK CHANDRA NAYAK	27 Aug 2021	Judgement	—
CC/388/2019	Bembadi Banaiah vs Gunta Beeraiah	26 Aug 2021	Order	—
CC/922/2020	State of telangana vs Vsjagannatham Arjun Kalyan	26 Aug 2021	Order	—
CC/100018/2016	GODAVARIKHANI 2 TOWN vs Ganta Samuel Paul Rao	26 Aug 2021	Judgement	—
CC/400/2021	State of telangana vs Akula Chiranjeevi	24 Aug 2021	Order	—
PRC/23/2021	State of telangana vs Banala Ravi	18 Aug 2021	Order	—
EP/47/2021	V. Krishna Murthi vs M.Swamy Das	12 Aug 2021	Order	—
EP/70/2019	Degala Kiran Kumar vs Mahaboob Khan	06 Aug 2021	Order	—
OS/85/2019	R. Sathish Kumar vs M/s. Optival Helath solutions pvt.ltd Rep by its Director,K.S Murali Krishna	06 Aug 2021	Order	—
CC/348/2021	State of telangana vs Penki Balaram	02 Aug 2021	Order	—
CC/815/2020	State of telangana vs Penki Balaram	02 Aug 2021	Order	—
EP/25/2019	Uppu Venkatesham vs Kande Mahendar	28 Jul 2021	Order	—
PRC/12/2019	T. Praveen Kumar Inspector of police GDK-2 towen vs Pittala Suresh	26 Jul 2021	Order	—
EP/57/2018	Mergu Chandra Mouli vs Byrogoni Narsaiah	12 Jul 2021	Order	—
CC/39/2020	State of telangana vs Paidipelli Venkata Swamy	10 Jul 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/78/2021	State of telangana vs Thulla Nagaraju	10 Jul 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/108/2018	Janangama Thirupathi vs Pegadamalli Ramesh	10 Jul 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/128/2021	State of telangana vs Bandela Ravi	10 Jul 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/137/2021	State of telangana vs Esarapu Sridhar	10 Jul 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/170/2021	State of telangana vs Rathna Thirumalesham	10 Jul 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/175/2021	State of telangana vs Salupala Rajaiah	10 Jul 2021	Order	—
CC/176/2021	State of telangana vs Mandala Kishan Reddy	10 Jul 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/217/2021	State of telangana vs MERUGU SRINIVAS	10 Jul 2021	Order	—
CC/219/2021	State of telangana vs Adepu Ajay	10 Jul 2021	Order	—
CC/220/2021	State of telangana vs Shake Imam	10 Jul 2021	Order	—
CC/222/2021	State of telangana vs Shaik Sadig	10 Jul 2021	Order	—
CC/225/2021	State of telangana vs Vskotte Rajendar	10 Jul 2021	Order	—
CC/227/2021	State of telangana vs Ram Reddy Guimmalla	10 Jul 2021	Order	—
CC/279/2019	NALI VANITHA vs NALI KUAMR	10 Jul 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/366/2021	State of telangana vs Balagoni Ramesh	10 Jul 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/464/2020	State of telangana vs Enagapalli Samba shiva Rao	10 Jul 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/700/2013	PS EXCISE GDK II TOWN vs KONDRA VISHWANATHAM	10 Jul 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/737/2019	Gopu Komuraiah vs Yadandla Dubbaiah	10 Jul 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/772/2020	State of telangana vs Manda Anilkumar goud	10 Jul 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/200018/2017	GDK II Vegolapu Venkatrajam vs Gujjuala Venkatramana Reddy	10 Jul 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/221/2021	State of telangana vs Bojja Sravn Kumar	06 Jul 2021	Order	—
CC/224/2021	State of telangana vs Kolluri Sathyanarayana	06 Jul 2021	Order	—
CC/228/2021	State of telangana vs Vslaxminarayana Panjala	06 Jul 2021	Order	—
CC/294/2021	State of telangana vs Gadde Eshwaramma	06 Jul 2021	Order	—
CC/67/2021	Pandilla Gopal Reddy vs Vsj . Magadevan	14 Jun 2021	Order	—
CC/326/2017	Pappula Srinivas vs Ponagauti Ram Reddy	04 May 2021	Order	—
OS/140/2018	Smt, Mohammadi Begum vs Shaik Sardar Pasha	30 Apr 2021	Order	—
OS/142/2018	Sharmila sulthana begum vs Shaik Sardar Pasha	30 Apr 2021	Order	—
CC/753/2019	Chippa Arjun vs Parikipandla Rama	20 Apr 2021	Order	—
EP/20/2021	Nanda Prameela vs Katta Bhoomaiah	15 Apr 2021	Order	—
CC/59/2017	Kusalava Finance Ltd K. Kateswara Rao vs G. Vijay	15 Apr 2021	Order	—
CC/349/2017	State Police through Anthergaon vs A1 Chippakurthi Saroja	15 Apr 2021	Judgement	—
EP/173/2017	Kothakonda Satyanarayana vs Jdr Irugurala Rajkumar	12 Apr 2021	Order	—
OS/19/2021	Pindyala Raj Kumar vs Pindyala Laxmi Rajam	10 Apr 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
OS/59/2021	katika Rajendra Prasad vs Katika Muthaiah	10 Apr 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
OS/67/2020	Vanga Krishna murthi vs Macherla Swamy Das	10 Apr 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
OS/92/2016	Gaddam Suguna vs Bhupelli Prasad	10 Apr 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
OS/94/2018	Thotapelli Pullaiah vs MD. Gapoor	10 Apr 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
OS/104/2017	Arkuti Lingaiah vs S.K. Ankoos Miya	10 Apr 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/4/2018	Mushke Ramesh vs A1 Achanta Gangadhar Rao	10 Apr 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/68/2018	Uppuleti Gouramma vs Uppuleti Kotha Shankar	10 Apr 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/260/2017	Gunta Pochamallu vs Gunta Thirupathi	10 Apr 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/542/2019	Udurukota Prianka vs Udurukota Srikanth	10 Apr 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/736/2019	Dasari Kumar vs Maggidi Chandraiah	10 Apr 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/770/2020	State of telangana vs Manupadu Venkatamma Alias Venkatalakshmi	10 Apr 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/924/2020	State of telangana vs Mohammed Zahooruddin	10 Apr 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/1051/2020	State of telangana vs Guda Santhosh	10 Apr 2021	Lokadalt Award	—
CC/370/2017	Damuka Rajaiah vs Madasu Sathaiah	09 Apr 2021	Order	—
CC/182/2018	Enjapuri Naveen Kumar vs Bhukya Yesu	08 Apr 2021	Order	—

Showing 100 of 2,802 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Oct 2021		5
Sep 2021		30
Aug 2021		12
Jul 2021		28
Jun 2021		1
May 2021		1
Apr 2021		30
Mar 2021		50
Feb 2021		11
Jan 2021		56
Dec 2020		91
Nov 2020		160

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has SRI PARVATAPU RAVI handled?

SRI PARVATAPU RAVI has handled 2877 court orders since 2016 at Godavarikhani - JCJ Court Complex. The average disposal rate is 49 orders per month.

What types of cases does SRI PARVATAPU RAVI hear?

Based on available records, SRI PARVATAPU RAVI primarily handles Criminal matters (Criminal Cases, Summary Trial Cases) and Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) at Godavarikhani - JCJ Court Complex.

Where is SRI PARVATAPU RAVI currently posted?

SRI PARVATAPU RAVI is posted as Prl. Junior Civil Judge at Godavarikhani - JCJ Court Complex, Peddapalli, Telangana.

Are judgments by SRI PARVATAPU RAVI available online?

Yes. 30 judgments by SRI PARVATAPU RAVI are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does SRI PARVATAPU RAVI dispose cases?

SRI PARVATAPU RAVI disposes approximately 49 cases per month, based on 2877 orders handled over their tenure at Godavarikhani - JCJ Court Complex.

Since when is SRI PARVATAPU RAVI serving?

SRI PARVATAPU RAVI has been serving at Godavarikhani - JCJ Court Complex since 2016.

Case Types

CC 54%

STC 35%

OS 5%

EP 3%

PRC 2%

DVC 1%

MC 0%

LPC 0%

Posting History

Jan 2020 — Oct 2021

Prl. Junior Civil Judge · 430 orders
Jan 2020 — Jan 2021

II Addl. Junior Civil Judge · 399 orders
Jul 2019 — Jan 2020

Prl. Junior Civil Judge · 65 orders
Jul 2019 — Jan 2021

Ist Addl. Junior Civil Judge · 443 orders
Jan 2019 — Mar 2019

Prl. Junior Civil Judge · 47 orders
Jan 2019 — Mar 2019

Ist Addl. Junior Civil Judge · 96 orders
Nov 2016 — Jan 2020

II Addl. Junior Civil Judge · 1,397 orders

Outcomes on Record

Convicted 8

Acquitted 7

Compromised 3

Other Judges at this Court

Nallala Venkat Sachin Reddy

Prl. Junior Civil Judge

517 orders

Ms. R. Swarika

Ist Addl. Junior Civil Judge

89 orders

Ms. Srinija Kohirkar

II Addl. Junior Civil Judge

68 orders

← View all judges at Godavarikhani - JCJ Court Complex

Sri Parvatapu Ravi

Page No. 1 of 8 CC No.25 of 2019

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL.JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF F.C.

: AT : GODAVARIKHANI.

THURSDAY, ON THIS THE 07TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021

CALENDAR CASE No.25 of 2019

A N D

: : J U D G M E N T : :

Page No. 2 of 8 CC No.25 of 2019

Page No. 3 of 8 CC No.25 of 2019

Page No. 4 of 8 CC No.25 of 2019

Page No. 5 of 8 CC No.25 of 2019

Page No. 6 of 8 CC No.25 of 2019

Page No. 7 of 8 CC No.25 of 2019

Page No. 8 of 8 CC No.25 of 2019

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

EXHIBITS MARKED

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL.JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF F.C.

: AT : GODAVARIKHANI.

FRIDAY, ON THIS THE 08TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021

CALENDAR CASE No.109 of 2018

A N D

: : J U D G M E N T : :

punishable under sections 498­A and 324 IPC ?

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

EXHIBITS MARKED

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

: AT : GODAVARIKHANI

FRIDAY, ON THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2020

ORIGINAL SUIT No.65 of 2019

:: J U D G E M E N T ::

Whether the plaintiff is entitled for suit amount as prayed for?

II-ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GODAVARIKHANI.

GODAVARIKHANI.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

EXHIBITS MARKED

II-ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GODAVARIKHANI.

GODAVARIKHANI.

Page No.1 of 4 OS No.111 of 2021

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

TUESDAY, ON THIS THE 05TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021

ORIGINAL SUIT No.111 of 2021

: J U D G E M E N T :

Page No.2 of 4 OS No.111 of 2021

Whether the plaintiff is entitled for suit amount as prayed for?

Page No.3 of 4 OS No.111 of 2021

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GODAVARIKHANI.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

Page No.4 of 4 OS No.111 of 2021

EXHIBITS MARKED

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

GODAVARIKHANI.

FAIR ORDER

GODAVARIKHANI

PRESENT: P. RAVI,

Thursday on this the 14 th day of March­2019

C.C. No. 159 of 2019

AND

:: DOCKET O R D E R ::

Judl. Magistrate of F.C.,

punishable under sections 498A and 324 IPC ?

Thursday on this the 14 th day of March2019