Smt S.aruna Sri

NATIONAL LOK ADALAT HELD AT PUTTU

BEFORE THE

(Organized by Mandal Lege

vices Authority Act 1987 (Central Ac committee, Puttu

under Section 19 of Legal Serviceg

Act)

dveen

Devendar Reddy, aged 32 ye

ma @ Jyothi, Wife of K.Deve years, House wife

muna, Daughter of K.Devendar Reddy, Minor, aged 15 years, Student

ears, Student K.Sasi Rekha, Daughter of K.Devendar Reddy, Minor, aged 12 years,

Student.

Plaintiffs No.2 & 3 are Minors, Dy their natural guardian/mother,

who is plaintiff No. 1 namely K.Bujanma Jyothi.

All are Hindu, residing at Pedaa Dayalu Village, Thirumalaiahpalli Post. Vedurukuppam Mandal, Chittoor District.

.Plaintiffs.

And:

1. Kamasani Chengal Pandu Reddy, Son of Late Thimma Reddy, Hindu, aged about 65 years, Cultivation.

2. K.Devendar Reddy, Son of Kamasani Chengal Pandu Reddy, Hindu, aged about 45 years, Cultivation.

3. K.Hari, Son of Kámasani Chengal Pandu Reddy, Hindu, aged about 45 years, Cultivation.

All are residing at Pedda Thirumalaiahpalli Post Bayalu Village, Vedurukuppam Mandal, Chittoor District. Defendants.

O.S.No:57 of 20200

on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Puttur

Lok Adalat Case Number: /4 2021

Sri. B.Appala Swamy, . Presiding Officer Present: 1

Senior Civil Judge, Puttur.

2. Sri. KPurushotham, Member Advocate, Puttur.

This case coming on this day for consideration before the National Lok Adalat in the presence of Sri. G.Raja Reddy, Advocate, Puttur, appearing on behalf of the plaintiffs No.l to 3; Sri. T.Ravi, Advocate, Puttur, appearing on behalf of the defendants No.l to 3; and in the presence of both parties and as per the advice of the members of the Lok

Adalat the case is compromised as per the following terms and

accordingly the Lok Adalat passed the following award.

(2)

AWARD

(Under Section.21 of the Legal Servio Authority Act, 1987 of the Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a decree of c COurt/Order of any other Court)

The plaintiffs have recelved an amount of Rs.1,0,000/- (Rupees 1. One Lakh only) by cash from the defendants towards their share in the suit/award schedule properties and hence they have forgo thelr right over the suit/award schedule properties and other Joint family properties and herein after, they have no rlght, ttle, possession and enjoyment over the same.

The plaintiffs have agreed that the defendants got all kinds of rights 2. over the suit/award schedule properties and further agreed that they won't file any case as against the defendants or their legal helrs on the suit/award schedule properties or any other properties belongs to them.

If any type of documents are came into existence connects to the suit/award schedule properties, in favour of third parties, the plaintiffs confirm the same and won't raise any objections.

Since the plaintiffs No.2 & 3 are Minors and they are in the care 3. and custody of the 1st plaintiff, hence, she is representing on behalf of herself and also on behalf of them and accordingly, she has received the said settlement amount.

The first plaintiff has agreed that she has forgo her right on her 4. maintenance, which was passed in M.C.No.14 of 2010 on 25-11-2014 by the Hon'ble Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Puttur, as against the desendant No.2 and further agreed that she won't file any petitionfor enforcement on the order in the said maintenance case.

5. The plaintifls agreed that there are no other joint family/ancestra properties apart from the suit/award schedule properties that are available for partition and apart from the suit/award schedule properties, other properties standing in the names of the defendants, arc their self acquired properties and that plaintiffs have no claims ovc those other properties stands in the names of the defendants.

(3)

PLAINT SCHEDULE

Sri Balaji Registration

District District Chittooor 8istration - Karvetinagaram Sub District edurukuppam mandalam Dry 1an Kondakindapalli Village accounts -

1. Sy.No.112/4A to an exCt of Ac 0-50 cents, within the following boundaries Road; EAST

The lands of S.Peddabba Reddy:

WEST

The lands of S.Peddabba Reddy;

NORTH

Road and lands of K.Chinnaswamy Reddy; SOUTH

2. Sy.No.113/2A to an extent of Ac 1-10 cents, within the following boundaries

EAST Road:

Vanka and Tippi Reddy bore well; WEST The lands of S.Narasimha Reddy and Road; NORTH The lands of K. Doraswamy Reddy and SOUTH K.Chinnaswamy Reddy;

3. Sy.No. 113/3 to an extet of Ac 1-19 cents, within the following boundaries Road; The lands of S.Narasimha Reddy; EAST The lands of S.Narasimha Reddy; WEST The lands of K.Chengal Pandu Reddy; NORTH

SOUTHI

4. Sy.No.346/2 to an extent of Ac 0-57 cents, wjthin the following boundaries The lands of K.Chengalpandu Reddy; EAST Vanka; WEST Road: NORTH The lands of Chinnaswamy Reddy; SOUTHI

. Ica }

K. ( L

3.

SIGNATUR� OF DEFENDANTS

SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFFS

cOUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS TIFFS sIGNATURE OF National Lok Adalat on sIo under our hands with the seal of the Gi i ve this the 11th day of September, 2021.

MEMBER

PRESIDTNG ADGE

KADALAT PUTTUR

BEFORE THELOK

(Constituted by the Mandal Legal Services Committee, Puttur

t the Legal Services Authority

(Under Section.20 of the Lec Act, 1987) On 11h day of September, 2021

EP.No.2212021

STC No.4512014

Qn the file of PrincipalLJunior Ivil Judge's Court. Puttur

Adalat Award No./96 2021

1, Sri B.Appala Swamy,. Present

senior Civil Judge,

Puttur Presiding Officer.

2. Sri K.Purushotham, Advocate, Puttur Member Between: K.Chengalraju, S/o Sundara Rama Rau, Hindu, aged about 67 years, retired employee, residing at D.No.1-64, NGOS colony, Puttur town and mandal, Chittoor District.

Decree Holder

And: P.Parthasarathy, S/o P.Kondaiah, aged about 52 years, Hindu, RTC Driver, residing at Siddapuram village, Rajagopalapuram post, Varadaiahpalem mandal, Chittoor District.

. Judgment Debtor AWARD (Under Section 21 of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 of the Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a decree of Civil Court Order of any other court)

The dispute between the parties having been referred for determination to the Lok Adalat and the parties having compromised and settled the case. The following terms of settlement referred in the Award.

TERMS OF COMPROMISE

1. The Judgment Debtor has paid entire EP amount to the Decree Holder today i.e., 11.09.2021 towards full and final settlement and the same was received by the Decree Holder.

Accordingly award is passed.

Signature oAhe becreb'h6lder

Signature of Judgment Debtor

Signature of the counsel for Signature of the counsel for Decree Holder

Judgment Debtor

(Given under my hand with the seal of the National Lok Adalat on this 11h day of September,

2021).

Pibsiting oficel

Member

The learned counsel for the petitioner /Vijaya Bank, represented by its branch Manager filed petition under order 23 Rule 1 and Section 151 CPC submitting that the plaintiff bank filed the suit against the defendant for recovery of the suit amount with interest accrued thereon. After filing of the suit, the first defendant paid the suit amount with interest to the plaintiff bank and settled the subject mattter of

O.S.No.68/2021 on 31.03.2021 as per the bank records. Hence, there is no need to proceed further in

the suit. Hence, the plaintiff bank intended to withdraw the above suit on the file of this court. Heard for the petitioner. Perused the entire record. In this suit, defendant No.1 and 2 did not appear before this court. Hence, the plaintiff bank intended to withdraw the suit and this court has no objection to allow the petition. Accordingly, the petition is allowed to withdraw the suit under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC. Hence, the suit is withdrawn.

The learned counsel for the petitioner /Vijaya Bank, represented by its branch Manager filed petition under order 23 Rule 1 and Section 151 CPC submitting that the plaintiff bank filed the suit against the defendant for recovery of the suit amount with interest accrued thereon. After filing of the suit, the first defendant paid the suit amount with interest to the plaintiff bank and settled the subject mattter of

O.S.No.68/2021 on 31.03.2021 as per the bank records. Hence, there is no need to proceed further in

the suit. Hence, the plaintiff bank intended to withdraw the above suit on the file of this court. Heard for the petitioner. Perused the entire record. In this suit, defendant No.1 and 2 did not appear before this court. Hence, the plaintiff bank intended to withdraw the suit and this court has no objection to allow the petition. Accordingly, the petition is allowed to withdraw the suit under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC. Hence, the suit is withdrawn.