Sri S.V. Prasad

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE: ONGOLE.

PRESENT: Sri S.Venkateswara Prasad,

Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole,

Wednesday, this the 30th day of September, 2015

ORIGINAL SUIT No.297/2015

Between:

1. Vemuri Sasi Kiran, s/o Nageswara Rao, aged 36 years, Hindu, business, r/o Mangamuru road, Ongole town, Prakasam District.

2. Pachava Sudhakar, s/o Nageswara Rao, 35 years, Hindu, business, r/o Marturu village and mandal, Prakasam District. … Plaintiffs

And

Mahesh Modi, aged 28 years, Hindu, business, r/o flat No.302, Sri Nilaya Apartments, opp. to Pavithra Jr. College, VIP road, Ongole town, Prakasam District. … Defendant

This is a suit filed by plaintiffs directing the defendant to perform his part of contract to pay the balance amount of Rs.3,75,000/- with interest at 24% p.a. and to lift the schedule mentioned property from the premises of Sri Granites,

Budawada in furtherance of the oral agreement dt.20.2.14, and to direct the defendant to pay the demurrage charges of Rs.1000/- per day from the date of receipt of notice till the date of lifting of the schedule mentioned property, and in alternative relief – for recovery of amount of Rs.4,80,000/- along with subsequent interest on Rs.3,75,000/- @ 24% p.a., and for costs.

This suit is coming on 18.9.2015 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri V.Narasimha Rao, Advocate for Plaintiffs; and of Sri

K.Srinivasulu, Advocate for Defendant; subsequently defendant called absent and set exparte; and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

Chief affidavit of Pw.1 filed and Exs.A.1 to A.3 are marked. The evidence of Pw.1 supported by Exs.A.1 to A.3 are unchallenged; plaintiffs proved the suit claim. Therefore, the suit is decreed with costs for a sum of Rs.4,80,000/- with subsequent interest at 12% p.a. from the date of suit, till the date of decree and thereafter at 6% p.a. till the date of realization on the principal amount of

Rs.3,75,000/- against the defendant.

Pronounced by me in open court, this the 30th day of September, 2015

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ONGOLE.

Appendix of Evidence Witnesses examined

For Plaintiff: For Defendant:

Pw.1 : V.Sasikiran- exparte (chief affidavit filed)

DOCUMENTS MARKED.

For Plaintiff:

Ex.A.1 : Office copy of legal notice dt.20.4.15

Ex.A.2 : Postal receipt dt.20.4.15

Ex.A.3 : Postal acknowledgment card dt.21.4.15

For Defendant:

-Nil -

PSCJ

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE: ONGOLE.

PRESENT: Sri S.Venkateswara Prasad,

Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole,

Wednesday, this the 30th day of September, 2015

ORIGINAL SUIT No.297/2015

Between:

1.Vemuri Sasi Kiran, s/o Nageswara Rao, aged 36 years, Hindu, business, r/o Mangamuru road, Ongole town, Prakasam District.

2.Pachava Sudhakar, s/o Nageswara Rao, 35 years, Hindu, business, r/o Marturu village and mandal, Prakasam District.

… Plaintiffs

And

Mahesh Modi, aged 28 years, Hindu, business, r/o flat No.302, Sri Nilaya Apartments, opp. to Pavithra Jr. College, VIP road, Ongole town, Prakasam District.

… Defendant

This is a suit filed by plaintiffs directing the defendant to perform his part of contract to pay the balance amount of Rs.3,75,000/- with interest at 24% p.a. and to lift the schedule mentioned property from the premises of Sri Granites, Budawada in furtherance of the oral agreement dt.20.2.14, and to direct the defendant to pay the demurrage charges of Rs.1000/- per day from the date of receipt of notice till the date of lifting of the schedule mentioned property, and in alternative relief – for recovery of amount of Rs.4,80,000/- along with subsequent interest on Rs.3,75,000/- @ 24% p.a., and for costs.

Plaint presented on : 23.4.2015Plaint filed on : 24.4.2015

Cause of action : Cause of action for the suit arose on 20.12.2014 when the defendant purchased movable schedule mentioned property including granite tiles in a bulk lot of approximate quantity of 8 tons of random material, 60x60 cm size 250 pieces, 60x30 cm size 1000 pieces (18 mm) and 60x30 cm size 800 pieces (30 mm) from the plaintiffs for an amount of Rs.4 lakhs only as bill contract on 20.2.2014 and that the material is situated in the premises of Sri Granites, Budawada and that the defendant paid an amount of Rs.25,000/- as advance before the witnesses and requested 10 days time to pay the balance amount to lift the above property and that the defendant failed to perform his part of contract and that plaintiffs approached and requested the defendant for fulfilling his part of contract but in vain, and where the schedule mentioned properties are situated at Budawada village which is within the jurisdiction of this court.

Valuation : For the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction – the suit for specific performance of the oral agreement dt.20.2.14 is valued at Rs.4,80,000/-, on which a court fee of Rs.7326/- is paid u/sec.39 of APCF & SV Act.

This suit is coming on 18.9.2015 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri V.Narasimha Rao, Advocate for Plaintiffs; and of Sri K.Srinivasulu, Advocate for Defendant; subsequently defendant called absent and set exparte; and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court doth order and decree :

1.that the defendant do pay to the plaintiffs a sum of Rs.4,80,000/- with subsequent interest at 12% per annum from the date of the suit i.e., 23.4.2015 till the date of decree i.e., 30.9.2015 and thereafter at 6% per annum till the date of realization on Rs.3,75,000/-; and

2.that the defendant does also pay to the plaintiffs a sum of Rs.15,552/- towards costs of the suit.

Given under my hand and seal of the Court, this the 30th day of September, 2015

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ONGOLE.

TABLE OF COSTS

Particulars For Plaintiffs For Defendant Stamp on Vakalath:2.00 Stamp on Plaint :7326.00 Stamp on Process :74.00 -exparte- Type charges:100.00 Advocate fee:8050.00 Total Rs. : 15,552.00

P.S.C.J.

Note:The exhibited documents and non-exhibited documents, which are marked, have to be taken back by the parties concerned within the stipulated time with an undertaking to produce the same as and when required by theCourt

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE::ONGOLE.

Present: Sri S.Venkateswara Prasad, B.A., B.L.,

Principal Senior Civil Judge,

FAC Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ongole.

Thursday, this the 06th day of March, 2014.

H.M.O.P. 52/2013

Between:

Pakanati Priyanka @ Nallamalapu Priyanka, W/o Pakanati Sudharsana Reddy, D/o Nallamalapu Anki Reddy, age 20 years, Hindu, House wife, R/o B. Nidamanuru village, N.G. Padu Mandal, Prakasam District. …Petitioner

AND Pakanati Sudharsana Reddy, S/o Subbarami Reddy, age 31 years, Employee, R/o Nayudupalem village, Pullalacheruvu Mandal, Prakasam District. ….Respondent

The petition is coming on 04.03.14 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri K. Anji Reddy, Advocate for Petitioner, and respondent is set exparte and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court made the following: -

:: O R D E R ::

1.This is a petition filed Under Section 13 (1) (ia) of Hindu Marriage Act to dissolve the marriage between the petitioner and respondent by decree of divorce and for costs.

2.Brief averments of the petition: -

The marriage of the petitioner and respondent was performed on 11-08-2012 at

Thalluru village of Phirangipuram post and mandal of Guntur District. After the marriage the parents of the petitioner brought the petitioner and respondent to their house to perform nuptials to the spouse on 12-08-2012. Unfortunately the marriage of the petitioner and respondent is not consummated. On the first night of nuptial the respondent did not touch the petitioner and told his grievance to the petitioner regarding the marriage that he is not interested to marriage with the petitioner and their marriage is performed against his will and also he further informed that he is not interested to lead marital life with the petitioner and tortured mentally and behaved cruelly on the petitioner and as such the marriage of the spouse is not consummated. On the very next day i.e., on 13-08-2012 the petitioner informed to his mother about the nature, conduct and disinterest of the respondent. Immediately the parents of the petitioner and others intervened and requested the respondent to develop interest upon the petitioner and to lead happy marital life. But the respondent did not hear the advice of elders and also paid a deaf-ear. The parents of the respondent also tired their level best to pacify the dispute and convince the respondent, but in vain. The respondent openly declared that he is not interested to lead marital life with the petitioner. As there is no chance of reunion, hence, this petition.

3.The respondent was served with notice through court, but remained exparte.

4.The petitioner is examined as P.W.1 and marked Ex.P1 and P3.

5.Heard counsel for petitioner.

6.Points for consideration are: -

1. Whether the respondent subjected the petitioner to cruelty within the meaning of

Section 13 (1) (ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955?

(2) Whether the petitioner is entitled for a decree of divorce?

7. POINT No.1 : -

The petitioner as P.W.1 in the chief examination affidavit reproduced the petition averments. The respondent did not challenge the case of the petitioner before the court and remained exparte. The unchallenged evidence of the petitioner proved that the respondent treated the petitioner cruelly. Hence the point no.1 is answered in favour of the petitioner.

POINT No.2: -

Whether the petitioner is entitled for a decree of divorce?

In the light of findings on point no.1, the petitioner is entitled for a decree of divorce.

Accordingly this point is answered in favour the petitioner.

8. In the result, petition is allowed. The marriage of the petitioner and respondent is dissolved by decree of divorce. No costs.

Pronounced by me in open court, this the 06 th day of March, 2014.

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

FAC ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ONGOLE.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined

For petitioner: - For Respondent: -

P.W.1: - Pakanati Priyanka @ Nallamalapu Priyanka -Nil-

DOCUMENTS MARKED.

For petitioner: - For Respondent: -

Ex.P1: 3 Marriage Photos NIL Ex.P2: Wedding invitation card Ex.P3: Xerox copy of Aadhaar card

PSCJ/FAC A.S.C.J.

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE::ONGOLE.

Present: Sri S.Venkateswara Prasad, B.A., B.L.,

Principal Senior Civil Judge,

FAC Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ongole.

Thursday, this the 06th day of March, 2014.

H.M.O.P. 52/2013

Between:

Pakanati Priyanka @ Nallamalapu Priyanka, W/o Pakanati Sudharsana Reddy, D/o Nallamalapu Anki Reddy, age 20 years, Hindu, House wife, R/o B. Nidamanuru village, N.G. Padu Mandal, Prakasam District. …Petitioner AND Pakanati Sudharsana Reddy, S/o Subbarami Reddy, age 31 years, Employee, R/o Nayudupalem village, Pullalacheruvu Mandal, Prakasam District. ….Respondent

This is a petition filed Under Section 13 (1) (ia) of Hindu Marriage Act to dissolve the marriage between the petitioner and respondent by decree of divorce and for costs.

Petition presented on: 18-11-2013

A court fee of Rs.10/- is paid under article 1 (vii) of Schedule II of APCF & SV Act.

The petition is coming on 04.03.14 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri K. Anji Reddy, Advocate for Petitioner, and respondent is set exparte and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court doth order and decree: -

1. that the marriage of the petitioner and respondent is hereby dissolved by decree of divorce; and

2. that each party do bear their own costs.

Given under my hand and seal of this court, this the 6 th day of March, 2014.

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

FAC ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ONGOLE.

TABLE OF COSTS

Both parties costs memos not filed.

PSCJ/FAC A.S.C.J.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE: ONGOLE

Present: Sri S.VENKATESWARA PRASAD,

Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole.

Friday, this the 23 rd day of January, 2015.

ORIGINAL SUIT No.277 of 2014.

Between:

Karamsetty Venkata Sesha Rao S/o late Dakshana murthy, aged about 45 years, Hindu, Advocate, R/o D.No.21-1-71(1), Ganugapalem, Ongole. --Plaintiff.

And

1. Koduri Anki Reddy S/o Brahma Reddy, aged about 55 years, Hindu, business, r/o. Opp. to Hotel Sarovar, Dharavari Garden, Ongole.

2. Karamsetty Kameswara Rao S/o Late Dakshna murthy, aged about 35 years, Hindu, Landlord, R/o D.N.21-1-71(1), Upstairs, Ganugapalem, Ongole. --Defendants.

Suit filed (1)to direct the 1st Defendant to vacate and deliver the vacant possession of the plaint schedule property to the plaintiff (2) both the defendants jointly and severally to pay Rs.1,44,000/- with interest @ 12% p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till realization of the same to the plaintiff i.e., arrears of rents from December, 2010 till end of December 2013(36 months) @ Rs.4,000/- per month; (3) the Defendant No.1 to pay Rs.6,000/- p.m. as damages in lieu of the rent to the plaint schedule property to the plaintiff from 01.01.2014 till delivery of the vacant possession of the same to the plaintiff; and for costs.

This suit coming on 23.01.2015 before me for final disposal in the presence of Sri Pattipati Ramamurthy, Advocate for the plaintiff and the 1st

Defendant died and the steps for D.1 not taken and the summons of 2nd

Defendant not yet served and the suit is dismissed for default and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

L.R steps for D1 not taken. Batta for D2 is not paid. Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Pronounced by me in open Court, this the 23rd day of January, 2015.

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ONGOLE.

Appendix of Evidence -No oral or documentary evidence adduced on either side -

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ONGOLE.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE: ONGOLE

Present: Sri S.VENKATESWARA PRASAD,

Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole.

Friday, this the 23 rd day of January, 2015.

ORIGINAL SUIT No.277 of 2014.

Between:

Karamsetty Venkata Sesha Rao S/o late Dakshana murthy, aged about 45 years, Hindu, Advocate, R/o D.No.21-1-71(1), Ganugapalem, Ongole. --Plaintiff.

And

1. Koduri Anki Reddy S/o Brahma Reddy, aged about 55 years, Hindu, business, r/o. Opp. to Hotel Sarovar, Dharavari Garden, Ongole.

2. Karamsetty Kameswara Rao S/o Late Dakshna murthy, aged about 35 years, Hindu, Landlord, R/o D.N.21-1-71(1), Upstairs, Ganugapalem, Ongole. --Defendants.

Suit filed (1)to direct the 1 st Defendant to vacate and deliver the vacant

possession of the plaint schedule property to the plaintiff (2) both the defendants jointly and severally to pay Rs.1,44,000/- with interest @ 12% p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till realization of the same to the plaintiff i.e., arrears of rents

from December, 2010 till end of December 2013(36 months) @ Rs.4,000/- per

month; (3) the Defendant No.1 to pay Rs.6,000/- p.m. as damages in lieu of the

rent to the plaint schedule property to the plaintiff from 01.01.2014 till delivery of the vacant possession of the same to the plaintiff; and for costs. , Plaint presented on 28.01.2014 and plaint filed on 15.04.2014. Valuation: The relief of delivery of vacant possession of the plaint schedule property, which was leased out to the defendant and the present rent is of Rs.4,000/- p.m., the yearly rent would be Rs.48,000/-; on which a Court fee of Rs.2326/- is paid U/s.40(2) of A.P.C.F. and S.V. Act. The relief recovery of arrears of rents for 3 years i.e., from December 2010(which was payable by January, 2011) to December, 2013 i.e., 36 months @ Rs.4,000/- p.m. i.e., Rs.1,44,000/-, on which a Court fee of Rs.3,026/- is paid U/s.20 of A.P.C.F. and S.V. Act. Total Suit value is Rs.48,000/- + Rs.1,44,000/- = Rs.1,92,000/-. Total Court Fee of Rs.2326/- + Rs.3926/- = Rs.6,252/-. This suit coming on 23.01.2015 before me for final disposal in the presence of Sri Pattipati Ramamurthy, Advocate for the plaintiff and the 1st Defendant died and the steps for D.1 not taken and the summons of 2nd Defendant not yet served and the suit is dismissed for default and having stood over for consideration till this day,this court doth order and decree:-

1. That the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default; and

2. That there be no order as to costs (No CM and FC filed on either side).

(Plaint schedule and Plaint plan are herewith attached)

Given under my hand and seal of the Court, this the 23 rd day of

January, 2015.

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ONGOLE.

Note: The exhibited documents and non-exhibited documents, which are marked, have to be taken back by the parties concerned within the stipulated time with an undertaking to produce the same as and when required by the Court.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE: ONGOLE.

PRESENT: Sri S.Venkateswara Prasad,

Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole,

Thursday, this the 22 nd day of January, 2015

ORIGINAL SUIT No.339/2014.

Between:

Grandhi Bhanu Narasimha Swamy S/o Lakshmi Prasada Rao, Hindu, aged 28 years, Business, Santhanuthalapadu (V & M), Prakasam District. ---------- Plaintiff.

And

Chaluvadi Venkata Subba Rao S/o Satyanarayana, Hindu, aged 56 years, Business, Resident of Plot No.301, Golden Enclave Apartment, Sundar Nagar, Ongole Town, Prakasam District. ---------- Defendant.

This suit is filed for recovery of Rs.9,50,000/- being the Principal and interest due on a promissory note dated 14.04.2011 executed by the defendant in favour of Plaintiff for Rs.5,00,000/- agreeing to repay the same with interest at 36% p.a. with subsequent interest and for costs., but interest claimed at 36% p.a.

This suit is coming on 20.01.2015 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri P. L. Govindaiah, Advocate for the plaintiff and the defendant remained exparte, and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

Chief affidavit of PW1 filed and Exs.A.1 to A.4 are marked. The evidence of PW1 supported by Exs.A.1 to A.4 is unchallenged; plaintiff proved the suit claim. Therefore, the suit is decreed with costs for a sum of

Rs.9,50,000/-and subsequent interest at 12% p.a. from the date of suit, till the date of decree and thereafter at 6% p.a. till the date of realization on the

principal amount of Rs.5,00,000/- against the defendant.

Pronounced by me in open court, this the 22ndday of January, 2015.

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ONGOLE.

Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses examined.

For Plaintiff: For Defendant:

PW1: Grandhi Bhanu Narasimha Swamy(Chief affidavit) -N O N E- (Exparte)

EXHIBITS MARKED.

For Plaintiff:

Ex.A1/14.04.2011: Promissory note executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff for Rs.5,00,000/-.

Ex.A2/ : Interest of Rs.90,000/- paid by defendant for the period from 14.04.2011 to 13.10.2011 and the same was endorsed on the back of Ex.A.1.

Ex.A3/02.04.2014: Office copy of legal notice.

Ex.A4/ : Un-Served R.P. cover with Postal Acknowledgment.

For Defendant: Nil.

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ONGOLE.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE: ONGOLE.

PRESENT: Sri S.Venkateswara Prasad,

Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole,

Thursday, this the 22 nd day of January, 2015

ORIGINAL SUIT No.339/2014.

Between:

Grandhi Bhanu Narasimha Swamy S/o Lakshmi Prasada Rao, Hindu, aged 28 years, Business, Santhanuthalapadu (V & M), Prakasam District. ---------- Plaintiff.

And

Chaluvadi Venkata Subba Rao S/o Satyanarayana, Hindu, aged 56 years, Business, Resident of Plot No.301, Golden Enclave Apartment, Sundar Nagar, Ongole Town, Prakasam District. ---------- Defendant.

This suit is filed for recovery of Rs.9,50,000/- being the Principal and interest due on a promissory note dated 14.04.2011 executed by the defendant in favour of Plaintiff for Rs.5,00,000/- agreeing to repay the same with interest at 36% p.a. with subsequent interest and for costs., but interest claimed at 36% p.a.

Plaint presented on 15.04.2014 and plaint filed on 29.04.2014.

VALUATION: Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.9,50,000/- on which a court fee of Rs.11,926/- is paid under Sec.20 of the A.P.C.F. and S.V. Act.

Cause of action for the suit arose on 14.04.2011 when the defendant executed the suit pronote in favour of plaintiff for Rs.5,00,000/- and at Santhanuthalapadu village where the suit transaction is took place which is within the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court.

This suit is coming on 20.01.2015 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri P. L. Govindaiah, Advocate for the plaintiff and the defendant remained exparte, and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court doth order and decree:

1.That the defendant do pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.9,50,000/- with subsequent interest at 12% per annum from the date of the suit i.e., 15.04.2014 till the date of decree i.e., 22.01.2015 and thereafter at 6% per annum till the date of realization on Rs.5,00,000/-; and

2. That the defendant do also pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.11,928/- towards institution costs of the suit.

Given under my hand and seal of the Court, the 22ndday of January, 2015.

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ONGOLE.

TABLE OF COSTS

Particulars For Plaintiff For Defendant Stamp on Vakalath :2-00-Exparte- Stamp on Plaint :11,926-00 Stamp on Process :- Type charges :- Advocate fee :-No CM & FC filed - Publication charges :- Total Institution costs of Rs. : 11,928-00

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ONGOLE.

Note: The exhibited documents and non­exhibited documents, which are marked, have to be taken back by the parties concerned within the stipulated time with an undertaking to produce the same as and when required by theCourt.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE: ONGOLE.

PRESENT: Sri S.Venkateswara Prasad,

Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole,

Tuesday, this the 29th day of September, 2015

ORIGINAL SUIT No.71 of 2015

Between:

Bandaru Rama Rao, s/o Ankamma, aged about 60 years, Hindu, business, r/o D.No.20-3-8, Mangalipalem, Bandlamitta, Ongole town, Prakasam District.

… Plaintiff

And

Tippireddy Srikanth, s/o Gurava Reddy, aged about 45 years, Hindu, unemployee, r/o Jhansi Enclave, Plot No.203, KPHB colony, Hyderabad.

… Defendant

This suit is filed for recovery of Rs.2,71,933/- being the Principal and interest due on a pronote dated 30.1.2012 executed by the Defendant in favour of Plaintiff for Rs.2,00,000/- agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a. with subsequent interest and for costs.

This suit is coming on 28.9.2015 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri C.Venkata Rao, Advocate for the plaintiff; defendant remained exparte; and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

Chief affidavit of Pw.1 filed and Ex.A.1 is marked. The evidence of

Pw.1 supported by Ex.A.1 is unchallenged; plaintiff proved the suit claim.

Therefore, the suit is decreed with costs for a sum of Rs.2,71,933/- with subsequent interest at 12% p.a. from the date of suit, till the date of decree and thereafter at 6% p.a. till the date of realization on the principal amount of Rs.2,00,000/- against the defendant.

Pronounced by me in open court, this the 29th day of September, 2015

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ONGOLE.

Appendix of Evidence Witnesses examined.

For Plaintiff: For Defendant:

Pw.1 : B.Rama Rao- exparte

DOCUMENTS MARKED.

For Plaintiff:

Ex.A.1 : Promissory note executed by defendant in favour of plaintiff for Rs.2,00,000/- dt. 30.1.2012

For Defendant:

-Nil -

PSCJ

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE: ONGOLE.

PRESENT: Sri S.Venkateswara Prasad,

Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole,

Tuesday, this the 29th day of September, 2015

ORIGINAL SUIT No.71 of 2015

Between:

Bandaru Rama Rao, s/o Ankamma, aged about 60 years, Hindu, business, r/o D.No.20-3-8, Mangalipalem, Bandlamitta, Ongole town, Prakasam District.

… Plaintiff

And

Tippireddy Srikanth, s/o Gurava Reddy, aged about 45 years, Hindu, unemployee, r/o Jhansi Enclave, Plot No.203, KPHB colony, Hyderabad.

… Defendant

This suit is filed for recovery of Rs.2,71,933/- being the Principal and interest due on a pronote dated 30.1.2012 executed by the Defendant in favour of Plaintiff for Rs.2,00,000/- agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a.

with subsequent interest and for costs.

Plaint presented on : 30.1.2015Plaint filed on : 7.2.2015

Cause of action :

Cause of action for the suit arose when on 30.1.12 the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.2 lakhs from plaintiff for his personal expenses and executed a pronote agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., when inspite of repeated demands made by plaintiff the defendant did not choose to pay the pronote amount with interest and postponing the same on some pretext or other; where the pronote transaction took place at Bandlamita, Ongole which is within the jurisdiction of this court.

Valuation :

For the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction – the suit is valued at

Rs.2,71,933/-, on which a court fee of Rs.5226/- is paid u/sec.20 of APCF & SV

Act.

This suit is coming on 28.9.2015 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri C.Venkata Rao, Advocate for the plaintiff; defendant remained exparte; and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court doth order and decree :

1. that the defendant do pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.2,71,933/- with subsequent interest at 12% per annum from the date of the suit i.e., 30.1.2015 till the date of decree i.e., 29.9.2015 and thereafter at 6% per annum till the date of realization on Rs.2,00,000/-; and

2. that the defendant does also pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.10,307/- towards costs of the suit.

Given under my hand and seal of the Court, this the 29th day of September, 2015

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ONGOLE.

TABLE OF COSTS

Particulars For Plaintiff For Defendant Stamp on Vakalath:2.00 Stamp on Plaint :5226.00 Stamp on Process :50.00 -exparte- Type charges:100.00 Advocate fee:4929.00 Total Rs. : 10,307.00

P.S.C.J.

Note: The exhibited documents and non-exhibited documents, which are marked, have to be taken back by the parties concerned within the stipulated time with an undertaking to produce the same as and when required by theCourt