Sri Sk.Sikinder Basha

In the Court of :Senior Civil Judge, Rayachoty

Case No. :OS/0000081/2011 K.padmaja aliaz K.G.padmaja Vs Shaik Anwar Hussain and 2 others

Date  : 13-04-2018

Business: Today, P.Chengamma, GPA holder of plaintiff is present and pressed on to the desk a requisition memo that she intends to file a petition for transfer, as such, one month time may be granted. This suit for declaration was filed on 13.09.2011, since then on one ground or the other trial was not commenced, now the matter has become a targeted case and pre-2012 matter. The plaintiff is not contesting the case directly, but being represented by GPA. Inspite of conditional orders, trial is not being commenced.Though it was stated that some revision was carried before the Hon&amp#039ble High Court of Judicature in CRPSR.7466/2018, but there no whisper in the memo filed today whether the revision was numbered or not and whether any stay was granted or not. The suit is coming up for dismissal today. Even then except seeking an adjournment, there is no effort by the plaintiff to commence the trial by filing chief evidence affidavit. I do not find any ground to continue old targeted suit just for the sake of granting adjournments. The suit is dismissed for non prosecution. Nature of Disposal : OTHERWISE DISPOSED Disposal Date: 13-04-2018

Senior Civil Judge, Rayachoty

In the Court of :Senior Civil Judge, Rayachoty

Case No. :OS/0000070/2017 Kalvapalli Yarram Reddy Vs C. Vijaya Bashkar Reddy

Date  : 13-04-2018

Business: This suit is filed by the plaintiff for recovery of amount based on promissory note dt.01.04.2015 and for costs. The defendant remained exparte on 20.03.2018. The plaintiff K.Yerram Reddy is present. He filed chief affidavit in lieu of chief examination, as P.W.1, and got marked Ex.A1 to A4, which shows that the defendant herein has borrowed as sum of Rs.2,25,000.00 from the plaintiff undertaking to repay the same with interest at the rate of 24 percent per annum and executed Ex.A1 promissory note. Inspite of repeated demands and by issuing notice under Ex.A.2, the defendant has failed to repay the amount due under the Ex.A1 suit promissory note till the date of filing the suit. The uncontested claim the plaintiff is proved. As such, the plaintiff is entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendant. In the result, the suit is decreed with costs for an amount of Rs.3,60,000.00 with subsequent interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum from the date of decree till the date of realization on principal sum of Rs.2,25,000.00 Nature of Disposal: DECREED WITH COSTS Disposal Date: 13-04-2018

Senior Civil Judge, Rayachoty

In the Court of :Senior Civil Judge, Rayachoty

Case No. :OS/0000078/2017 Naguru Subbareddy Vs Dr. K. Nagalingeswar Reddy

Date  : 11-04-2018

Business: P.W.1 is present and affirmed the contents of his chief evidence affidavit on oath, and marked as Ex.A.1 to A.7. The counsel for plaintiff reported no further evidence. The defendant already remained exparte. Judgment pronounced in the open court (vide separately). In the result, the suit is decreed with costs, directing the defendant to pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.4,20,430.00 with subsequent interest at the rate of 12 percent per annum from the date of decree , and thereafter at 6 percent per annum from the date of decree till realization on the principal sum of Rs.2,50,000.000 Nature of Disposal: DECREED WITH COSTS Disposal Date: 11-04-2018

Senior Civil Judge, Rayachoty

In the Court of :Senior Civil Judge, Rayachoty

Case No. :H.M.O.P/0000037/2017 Kutla Vijayabashkara Vs Thamidhalapati Sukanya @ K.Hasini

Date  : 16-04-2018

Business: Both the parties are present in person and filed a joint memo that they have ageed to file a divorce petition by mutual consent at Tirupathi hence, the petitioner is not pressing this petition for restitution u/s 9 of Hiden meaning Act. Memo is recorded. The petition is dismissed as not pressed. Nature of Disposal: DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED Disposal Date: 16-04-2018

Senior Civil Judge, Rayachoty

In the Court of :Senior Civil Judge, Rayachoty

Case No. :H.M.O.P/0000005/2017 Pujala Chiranjeefvi Vs Kokku malleswari

Date  : 20-04-2018

Business: I.A.No.204/2018 is allowed. The matter is advanced from 23.04.2018 to this day i.e,20.04.2018. Both parties filed memo stating that they wants to settle the matter before the Lok Adalath. Memo is recorded. Hence, the matter is referred to Lok Adalath for recording of terms between the both parties. Nature of Disposal: REFERRED TO LOK ADALAT Disposal Date: 20-04-2018

Senior Civil Judge, Rayachoty