Sri T. Raja Venkatadri, B.A., B.L.,

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE : CHIRALA

Present: Sri T. Raja Venkatadri, B.A.,B.L., Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Chirala. Wednesday, this the 4th day of June, 2014.

O.S.No.198/2013

Between :

Maddala Yathiraja Sampath Kumar, s/o.Subbarayudu, aged about 29 years, Business, Hindu, R/o.R.T.C Colony Road, Kothapet village, Vetapalem madal, Prakasam District. … Plaintiff

And

Dhalli Lakshmana Reddy, s/o.D.Suraiah, aged about 48 years, Hindu, Business, R/o.Near Poleramma Temple, Vittal Nagar, Chirala, Prakasam District. … Defendant

Suit is filed for recovery of Rs.14,146/- being the principal and interest due on a pronote dated 15-6-2010 executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff for Rs.10,000/- agreeing to repay the same with compound interest at 24% p.a. annually rests and for costs.

This suit is coming on this day before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri P.Sudhakara Rao and Sri P.V.Tulasiram, Advocates for Plaintiff; and defendant called absent, remained exparte, this court delivered the following :

J U D G M E N T

Perused the record. The unchallenged evidence of Pw1 coupled with Ex,A1 clinchingly establishes the claim of the plaintiff. Hence, the suit is decreed with costs as prayed for.

In the result, suit is decreed with costs for a sum of Rs.14,146/- with future interest at 12% p.a. on Rs.10,000/- from the date of filing of the suit till the date of decree, and at 6% p.a. from the date of decree till the date of of realization.

Pronounced by me in open court, this the 4th day of June, 2014.

Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Chirala.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintiff :

Pw.1 : Maddala Yathiraja Sampath Kumar

For Defendant :- None -

Documents Marked on behalf of Plaintiff

Ex.A.1: Pronote executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff, dt. 15.06.2010.

Documents Marked on behalf of Defendant- Nil-

Prl. J.C.J. Chirala.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE:: CHIRALA.

Present: Sri T.Raja Venkatadri, B.A., B.L.,

Principal Junior Civil Judge, chirala.

Thursday, this the 3rd day of June, 2014

Original Suit No.02 of 2008

Sri Sai Lakshmi Handlooms, rep. by its Proprietor Kowtrapu Srinivasa Rao, s/o.Venkata Rao, aged about 41 years, Hindu, Business and resident of Jakkavari Street, Perala in Chirala Municipality,

Prakasam District. .. Plaintiff.

Vs.,

The Gram Panchayat, Kothapet, rep. by its Panchayat Secretary, Kothapet in Vetapalem mandal, Prakasam District. ... Deendant

This suit coming on the same day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri B.Hemanth Kumar, Advocate for the plaintiff and of Sri R. Ramesh Babu, advocate for defenant, and the plaintiff called absent the suit is dismissed for default, this court delivered the following:-

Suit is filed for declaration that the impugned notice dated 19.12.2007 in R.O.C.No.83/07 to the plaintiff to stop the business of the plaintiff is illegal, void, abitraray and unenforciable under law and for consequencial permanent injunction restraning the defendant and their men or agents and their subordiates from distubing the business activity of the plaintiff or in any interfering with their computarised Embroidery business activity in the plaint schedule premises and for costs.

J U D G M E N T

Plainitff called absent. Sri G.Thirupathi Rao, junior of Sri B.Hemanth

Kumar, Hence, reported in open couort that suit may be dismissed for default.

Hence, suit is dismissed for default. No costs.

Pronounced by me in open Court, this the 3rd day of July, 2014.

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Chirala.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

-- NIL --

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Chirala.

DOCKET ORDER

O.S.NO. 331 of 2011

DATED: 16.07.2014

Notice given both counsel. Judgment pronounced V.S.J. In the result, the suit is decreed with costs directing the defendants 1 to 5 to pay from out of the estate of the deceased

Nandelu Srinivasa Rao, which is now in their hands and defendants 6 to 8 to pay jointly and severally, a sum of Rs. 60204/- with subsequent interest at 12 Percent p.a., from the date f the suit, till the date of decree and thereafter with future interest at 6 percent p.a., till the date of realization on the balance amount of Rs. 52000/-.

DOCKET ORDER

O.S.NO. 72 of 2014

DATED: 02.09.2014

Judgment pronounced Vide Separate Judgment. In the result, the suit of the plaintiff is decreed with costs and the defendant is directed to pay Rs. 21800 rupees twenty one thousand eight hundred only to the plaintiff together with interest at the rate of 12 percent p.a., from the date of suit to the date of decree and further interest at the rate of 6 percent p.a., from the date of decree till realization on principal amount of Rs. 20000.

DOCKET ORDER

E.P.NO.104 of 2011

DATED: 05.06.2014

Guarnishe of R2 submitted a report that already 2 attachments

are existing over the salary of R2. Sri P.H.B filed memo for not

pressing the E.P. against R2. Hence, E.P. is dismissed against

R2. Already E.P. not pressed against R1 and R3. Attach effected

against R4 on 25-02-2014. Hence attachment made absolute

against R4. E.P. Closed.