Sri.t.v.rajesh Kumar

IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDITIONAL

JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE : RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM.

PRESENT: SRI T.V.RAJESH KUMAR,

II ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE,

RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM.

Friday, the 1st day of November, 2019

C.C.No. 2449 / 2018 BETWEEN:

Oruganti Satyanarayana S/o. Late Suryanarayana Murthy, Hindu, aged 45 years, Business, D.No.80-16-27/3/3, Sri Jayalaxmi Nivas Apartment, G-3, Srinivasa Nagar,

....COMPLAINANT

A.V. Apparao road, Rajahmundry.

AND

Vinnakota Venkata Ratnam S/o. Late Suryanarayana Murthy, Block flat No.304, Harivillu Apartments (happy place), Sainagar, Rajahmundry.….Accused

This case is filed by the complainant under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, against the accused.

This case coming up before me on 01.11.2019, for hearing in the presence of Sri.K. Malleswara Rao, learned counsel for the complainant and Sri. Md. M. Chisti, learned counsel for accused and having stood over till this day for consideration, this Court delivered the following;

J U D G M E N T

Complainant present. Petition filed under Sec.257 Cr.P.C. allowed.

Permitted to withdraw the complaint. The C.C is dismissed as withdrawn and the accused is acquitted under Sec.257 Cr.P.C. for the offence under

Sec.138 of N.I.Act.

Pronounced in the open court, this the 1st day of November, 2019.

II A.J.F.C.MAGISTRATE,

RAJAMAHEDRAVARAM.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PROSECUTION:

PW.1: O. Satyanarayana

FOR DEFENCE: Nill

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PROSECUTION:

Ex.P1 is the original promissory note dt.09.11.2016 for Rs.4,50,000/- executed by accused in favour of complainant. Ex.P2 is cheque No.474427 dt, 15.07.2018 for Rs.4,50,000/- drawn on SBI, Ravulapalem Ex.P3 is cheque return memo dt.17.07.2018 issued by bank of HDFC Bank. Ex.P4 is office copy of legal notice dt.21.07.2018 issued to accused. Ex.P5 is two postal receipts. Ex.P6 is postal acknowledgement dt.24.07.2018 stands in the name of accused Ex.P7 is postal acknowledgement dt.30.07.2018 stands in the name of accused.

FOR DEFENCE: -Nil-

II A.J.F.C.M.

IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDITIONAL

JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE : RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM. PRESENT: SRI T.V.RAJESH KUMAR,

II ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE,

RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM.

Thursday, the 14th day of October, 2019.

C.C.No. 1702 / 2019

BETWEEN:

M/s. Kapil chits (Kosta) Pvt. Ltd., T. Nagar, Rajahmundry, Rep. By its Legal Officer M.T. Ram Kumar S/o.M.V.V.Satyanarayana, Hindu,

...COMPLAINANT

aged 35 years, Rajahmundry.

AND

Kandula Venkateswarlu

S/o. Balaiah, Hindu, aged 51 years,

D.No.4-237, Nakarikallu (post & Mandal)

Guntur District. ....ACCUSED

This case is filed by the complainant under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, against the accused.

This case coming up before me on 31.10.2019, for hearing in the presence

of Sri. Md. M. Chisti, learned counsel for the complainant and having stood

over till this day for consideration, this Court delivered the following;

J U D G M E N T

Complainant present and filed petition under Sec.257 Cr.P.C. and the same is allowed. Permitted to withdraw the complaint. The C.C is dismissed as withdrawn and the accused is acquitted under Sec.257

Cr.P.C. for the offence under Sec.138 of N.I.Act.

Pronounced in the open court, this the 31st day of October, 2019

II A.J.F.C.MAGISTRATE,

RAJAMAHEDRAVARAM.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

Nill

II A.J.F.C.M.

IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDITIONAL

JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE : RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM.

PRESENT: SRI T.V.RAJESH KUMAR,

II ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE,

RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM.

Thursday, the 31st day of October, 2019

C.C.No. 05 / 2019

BETWEEN:

Dodda Anantha Satya Sekhar, S/o. Mutyam, Hindu, Rajahmundry.….COMPLAINANT

AND

Bodala Siva Subrahmanyam S/o. Ramarao, Hindu, aged 56 years, D.No.35-11-18, Mangalavarapupeta, Rajahmundry. ….ACCUSED

This case is coming on 31.10.2019 for hearing before me in the presence of Sri. M. Jagannadha Das, learned counsel for complainant and having till this day, this Court delivered the following;

J U D G M E N T

Complainant absent. No representation. Process not filed. It appears that the complainant is not interested in prosecuting his case.

Hence, the complaint is dismissed for default and accused is acquitted under Sec.256 Cr.P.C.

Pronounced in the open court, this the 311st day of October, 2019

II A.J.F.C.MAGISTRATE,

RAJAMAHEDRAVARAM.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE.

NIL.

II A.J.F.C.M.

dan, DaaonOG.

3sc s

aog3 gs

19 Jgds e erod sho 1987 6o

-

3 2008 s0s5)6s»

2) úd oAdyee

3)

(55 30. 2782ot 9 0. 31gs e6ss

LAC-DO 2645/2ol 9

1)

go

1) 2 u3S, 1) 1)

3.e6.3.3. so

D war). rs 320 (8)

so6

(ao5 Ss5 s6) E5: So

22 2

RgRdun

3//l0/ 207g sonGo 3As aró dabaadsa.

2) 3. 3ome