Smt V.V.N.V.Lakshmi

Additional Junior Civil Judge

II Addl District Court Adoni · Kurnool · Andhra Pradesh

Smt V.V.N.V.Lakshmi, Additional Junior Civil Judge, is posted at II Addl District Court Adoni, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India. 160 court orders on record since 2023. 6 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CC, MC, OS cases.

160

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

CC/956/2022 Acquitted

Adoni III Town Ps vs G.Mohd.Ghouse Peer

26 Oct 2023

IN THE COURT OF I ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

ADONI.

PRESENT: Smt.V.V.N.V.Lakshmi,

II Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni.

F/A/C I Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni.

Thursday, the 26 th Day of October, 2023

C.C.No.956/2022

Between : State: The Sub-Inspector of Police, Adoni III Town Police Station.

.... Complainant

and

1. G.Mohd. Ghouse Peer, S/o.G.Md.Mujahid, Aged 42 years, Residing at H.No.1/MIG/II/366/2, APHB Colony, Adoni.

2. G.Mohd. Muzahid,S/o. late G.Abdul Rahim, Aged 70 years, Residing at H.No.366/2, MIG Colony, Adoni.

3. G.Mehamunnisa, W/o. G.Muhammed Mujahid, Aged 57 years, Residing at H.No.366/2, MIG Colony, Adoni.

4. G.Rafath Jabeen @ Rafath, D/o. G.Muhammed Mujahid Aged 44 years, Residing at H.No.26/169, Kowdalpet, Adoni.

5. G.Anees Ahmed, S/o.G.Md.Mujahid, Aged 45 years, Residing at 1st floor, 2nd cross, Jayanagar, Someswwara Nagar, Bangalore.

6. G.Khader Basha, S/o.G.Md.Mujahid, Aged 35 years, Residing at H.No.1st Block, Jayanagar, Someswarnagar, Bangalore.

7. K.Heena Kosur, W/o.G.Mohd Ghouse Peer, Aged 24 years, Residing at H.No.12-960, Masjidpura, Adoni. Now residing at H.No.1/MIG/II/366/2, A.P.H.B. Colony, Adoni.

8. K.Basheer Ahmed, S/o. late K.Ahmed Hussain, Aged 37 years, H.No.12/960, Masjidpura, Adoni.

....A1 to A8

This case coming before me for final hearing on 19-10-2023 in the presence of A.P.P. for State and Sri.Alhaj A Mansur Ahmed and Sri.A.Md.Parvez Kamal Sanan, Advocates, for A1 to A8 and upon hearing both sides and the matter having stood upon for consideration to this day, this court delivered the following:

:: JUDGMENT ::

01.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Adoni III Town Police Station, filed charge sheet against A1 to A8 in Crime No.294/2020 for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 498-A, 494 r/w. 34 of IPC and Secs.3 and 4 of D.P. Act.

02. In brief, the case of the prosecution as unfolded in the charge sheet is stated as follows:

That LW.1-Ghousia Kausar is resident of Gabbur Village of

Devadurga Taluk of Raichur District. The marriage of LW.1 was performed with A1 of Adoni Town on 29-6-2018. At the time marriage, parents of

LW.1 gave 5 tulas of gold, cash of Rs.1 lakh, household articles and clothes to accused and to his family. A2 to A6 informed to the LW.’1 family with deceitful words that A1 is a private employee and getting good salary and having sufficient income. After the marriage, LW.1 joined her matrimonial home and after some days, LW.1 observed that A1 is not an employee and no source of income to run family and they were deceived by fraudulent misrepresentation to them. Thereafter, A1 to A6 started harassment towards LW.1 with a demand to get Rs.5 lakhs from her parents. With a great difficulty, parents of LW.1 arranged Rs.5 lakhs to the accused and in the meantime, LW.1 blessed with a male child, for which LW.1 went to her parental home and since then, A1 to A6 refused to join LW.1 with them. In this regard, LW.1 filed a complaint in Family Court,

Raichur for claiming maintenance amount from A1. While so, on 12-9- 2020, A1 got second marriage with A7 (Heena Kausar) with the support of

A2 to A6 and A8 at Adoni with consent of LW.1.

03. Basing on the complaint of L.W.1, LW.9-G.Sadiq Basha, Sub Inspector of Police, Adoni III Town Police Station registered it as a case in Crime

No.294/2020 under Sections 420, 498-A, 494 r/w. 34 of IPC and Secs.3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. During the course of investigation, LW.9 examined LWs.1 to 8 and recorded their statements and he served

Sec.41-A Cr.P.C. notice to A1 to A8 and after completion of investigation, he filed charge sheet. Hence, the charge.

04.This case was taken on file against the accused for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 498-A, 494 r/w. 34 of IPC and Secs.3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

05.After appearance of the accused case copies and relevant documents were furnished to them as contemplated under section 207 of

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.

06.Accused were examined under section 239 of Cr.P.C. Charge under

Sections 420, 498-A, 494 r/w. 34 of IPC and Secs.3 and 4 of Dowry

Prohibition Act was framed, read over and explained to them in Telugu, for which they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

07.To substantiate its case, the prosecution examined P.Ws.1 and 2 and got marked Exs.P1 to P3 on its behalf. No defence witnesses were examined and no exhibits were marked on behalf of the accused. Learned

Assistant Public Prosecutor has given up the evidence of L.Ws.2, 4 to 10.

08.After completing the evidence of complainant, the accused were examined under Sec.313 of Cr.P.C., in respect of the incriminating evidence available in the prosecution evidence. The substance of the incriminating evidence was read over and explained to the accused in

Telugu, to which the accused pleaded ignorance and accused reported no defence evidence.

09.Now the point for determination is:

Whether the prosecution has proved the guilt of A1 to A8

beyond reasonable doubt for the offences punishable under

Section 420, 498-A, 494 r/w. 34 of IPC and Secs.3 and 4 of Dowry

Prohibition Act?

10. In brief, it is the case of the prosecution that on 29-6-2018, the marriage of PW.1 was performed with A1 and at the time of marriage, parents of P.W.1 gave dowry of cash of Rs.1 lakh, household articles and cloths to the accused family. At the time of marriage, A1 to A6 informed to the parents of PW.1 that A1 is working as a private employee and he is having sufficient income to run his family. After the marriage, L.W.1 went to her matrimonial home and after some days, PW.1 observed that A1 is not working in any company. Thereafter, A1 to A6 started harassing PW.1 and demanded to get Rs.5 lakhs from her parents. Parents of PW.1 arranged Rs.5 lakhs and gave to the accused. Thereafter, PW.1 gave birth to a male child, for which, PW.1 went to her parent’s house and since then A1 to A6 refused to join PW.1 with them and on 12-9-2020, A1 got his second marriage with A7 with the support of other accused without consent of PW.1.

In support of case of prosecution P.W.1 deposed that A1 to A8 never harassed her and he signed on some papers at Police Station and she does not know its contents.

P.W.2 deposed that she does not know anything about the facts of this case.

11. In this case, none of the prosecution witnesses supported the case of prosecution. P.Ws.1 and 2 turned hostile. In view of above evidence, learned Asst. Public Prosecutor chosen to given up the evidence of other witnesses. Thus, absolutely there is no evidence on record supporting the case of the prosecution that A1 to A8 harassed P.W.1 for additional dowry, cheated P.W.1 and A1 married A7. Prosecution witnesses failed to support the case of the prosecution in clear and cogent terms which creates doubt on the veracity of prosecution case. Hence, this court is inclined to acquit the accused. Point is answered in favour of accused.

12. In the result, A1 to A8 are found not guilty for the offences punishable u/Secs.420, 498-A, 494 r/w. 34 of IPC and Secs.3 and 4 of D.P. Act and accordingly, they are acquitted under Sec.248 (1) of

Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the accused are ordered to be in force for a period of six months along with surety bonds as per Section 437-A of

Cr.P.C. Un-marked case property if any, shall be destroyed after expiry of appeal time.

Typed to my dictation to the Stenographer GradeI, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 26 th day of October, 2023.

Sd/- Smt.V.V.N.V.Lakshmid

II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni.

F/A/C I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class,

Adoni.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Complainant For Defence

Pw1: Ghousia Kousar None Pw2: Shekhan Bee

DOCUMENTS MARKED

For Complainant: For Defence

Ex.P.1: Signature of PW.1 on the report. Nil Ex.P.2: Sec.161 Cr.P.C. statement of PW.1. Ex.P.3: Sec.161 Cr.P.C. statement of PW.2.

Sd/- Smt.V.V.N.V.Lakshmid

II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class,

Adoni.

F/A/C I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class,

Adoni.

//True Copy//

II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni. F/A/C I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni

CALENDER AND JUDGMENT

IN THE COURT OF I ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS :: ADONI.

C.C.956/2022

1Date of OffencePrior to 29-09-2020 2Date of Complaint29-09-2020 3Date of apprehension of the accusedSec.41-A Cr.P.C. notice served. 4Date of release on bail-- 5Date of Commencement of Trial19-10-2023 6Date of Close of Trial19-10-2023 7Date of Judgment26-10-2023

Calendar and Judgment in C.C.No.956/2022 On the file of I Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni.

ComplainantSub Inspector of Police, Adoni III Town P.S. Cr.No.294/2020 of Adoni III Town Police Station. Accused1.G.Mohd. Ghouse Peer, S/o.G.Md.Mujahid, Aged 42 years, Residing at H.No.1/MIG/II/366/2, APHB Colony, Adoni.

2.G.Mohd. Muzahid, S/o. late G.Abdul Rahim, Aged 70 years, Residing at H.No.366/2, MIG Colony, Adoni.

3.G.Mehamunnisa, W/o. G.Muhammed Mujahid, Aged 57 years, Residing at H.No.366/2, MIG Colony, Adoni.

4.G.Rafath Jabeen @ Rafath, D/o. G.Muhammed Mujahid Aged 44 years, Residing at H.No.26/169, Kowdalpet, Adoni.

5.G.Anees Ahmed, S/o.G.Md.Mujahid, Aged 45 years, Residing at 1st floor, 2nd cross, Jayanagar, Someswwara Nagar, Bangalore.

6.G.Khader Basha, S/o.G.Md.Mujahid, Aged 35 years, Residing at H.No.1st Block, Jayanagar, Someswarnagar, Bangalore.

7.K.Heena Kosur, W/o.G.Mohd Ghouse Peer, Aged 24 years, Residing at H.No.12-960, Masjidpura, Adoni. Now residing at H.No.1/MIG/II/366/2, A.P.H.B. Colony, Adoni.

8.K.Basheer Ahmed, S/o. late K.Ahmed Hussain, Aged 37 years, H.No.12/960, Masjidpura, Adoni. Section of LawU/Secs.420, 498-A, 494 r/w. 34 of IPC and Secs.3 and 4 of D.P. Act.

FindingA1 to A8 are found not guilty for the offences under Sections 420, 498-A, 494 r/w. 34 IPC. Sentence of Order In the result, A1 to A8 are found not guilty for the offences punishable u/Secs.420, 498-A, 494 r/w. 34 of IPC and Secs.3 and 4 of D.P. Act and accordingly, they are acquitted under Sec.248 (1) of Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the accused are ordered to be in force for a period of six months along with surety bonds as per Section 437-A of Cr.P.C. Un-marked case property if any, shall be destroyed after expiry of appeal time.

// Try //Sd/- Smt.V.V.N.V.Lakshmid/- II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni. F/A/C I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni.

Copy submitted to: The Hon’ble Chief-Judicial Magistrate-Cum-

Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Kurnool.

//True Copy//

II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni. F/A/C I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni

CC/498/2017 Acquitted

The SHO Adoni I Town P.S. vs Madla Venkatesh and another

17 Oct 2023

IN THE COURT OF I ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST

CLASS, ADONI

Present: Smt. V.V.N.V. Lakshmi

II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Adoni

F/A/C I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni.

Tuesday, the 17 th day of October, 2023

C.C.498/2017

Between : State: Inspector of Police, Adoni I Town Police Station.

.... Complainant

And

1. Mandla Venkatesh, S/o.Rogenna, Aged 30 years,

2. Mandla Eswaramma @ Lalitha, W/o. M.Venkatesh, Aged 26 years,

Both are the residents of Hanuman Nagar, near Koravanjanamma Temple, Adoni Town. .... A1 and A2

This case coming before me for final hearing on 13-10-2023 in the presence of APP for State and of Sri.sT.Prabhakar, Advocates for A1 and A2; and upon hearing both sides and the matter having stood upon for consideration to this day, this court delivered the following:

:: JUDGMENT ::

01.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Adoni I Town Police Station, filed charge sheet against A1 and A2 in Crime No.112/2017 for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 509 r/w. 34 IPC.

02. In brief, the case of the prosecution as unfolded in the charge sheet is stated as follows:

That L.W.1-Y.Hanumanthamma is a resident of Kurnool Town. On 17- 7-2017, at about 12.30 hours, LW.1 came to the house of A1 who is his younger brother in law situated in Hanuman Nagar, Adoni for asking money. For which A1 and his wife A2 beat LW.1 with hands and legs and caused dumb injuries and A1 and A2 also abused LW.1 in filthy language.

LWs.2 to 4 witnessed the offence.

03. Basing on the complaint of L.W.1, L.W.5-S.Thimma Reddy, Head

Constable 2389 of Adoni I town Police Station registered it as a case in

Crime No.112/2017 under Sections 323, 509 r/w. 34 of IPC and investigated into. During the course of investigation, on 21-1-2017, L.W.5 examined L.W.1 and recorded her statement and also draw the rough sketch of scene of offence. During the course of investigation, On 25-7- 2017, LW.6-T.Babu, Sub Inspector of Police, Adoni I Town Police Station examined L.Ws.2 to 4 and recorded their statements. On 8-8-2017, LW.6 served Sec.41-A Cr.P.C. notice to A1 and A2.

After completion of investigation, L.W.6 filed charge sheet against the accused. Hence, the charge.

04.This case was taken on file against the accused for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 509 r/w. 34 of IPC.

05.After appearance of the accused case copies and relevant documents were furnished to them as contemplated under section 207 of

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.

06.Accused were examined under section 239 of Cr.P.C. Charge under

Sections 323, 509 r/w. 34 of IPC was framed, read over and explained to them in Telugu, for which they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

07.To substantiate its case, the prosecution examined P.Ws.1 to 6 and got marked Exs.P1 to P6 on its behalf. No witnesses were examined and no documents were marked on behalf of the defence.

08.After completing the evidence of prosecution, the accused were examined under Sec.313 of Cr.P.C., in respect of the incriminating evidence available in the prosecution evidence. The substance of the incriminating evidence was read over and explained to the accused in

Telugu, to which accused denied the evidence and reported no defence evidence on their side.

09.Now the point for determination is:

Whether the prosecution has proved the guilt of A1 and A2

beyond reasonable doubt for the offences u/Secs.323, 509 r/w. 34

of IPC?

Point:

10. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor argued that it is the case where

Accused 1 and 2 abused and beat PW.1. To prove the case of the prosecution, prosecution has examined P.W.1 to 6 and got marked Exs.P1 to P6. The sole testimony of PW.4 clearly supported by prosecution without consistencies and prayed this Hon’ble Court to convict the accused.

11. Defence counsel argued that P.Ws.1 to 3 turned hostile. There is delay of four days in lodging the report which was not explained by the prosecution. No filthy language said to be used by accused was deposed by PW.4. There are many inconsistences in the evidence of PW.4.

Accused is innocent and this case was falsely foisted against the accused.

Hence, prayed this Hon’ble Court to acquit the accused.

12. In brief, it is the case of the prosecution that on 17-7-2017, at about 12.30 hours, when PW.1 went to the house of accused for asking money, A1 and A2 beat PW.1 with hands and legs and abused P.W.1 in filthy language. PWs.1 to3 who are examined as independent witnesses deposed that they do not know anything about the facts of this case.

P.W.4 deposed that on 17-7-2017, at about 12.30 pm, she went to the house of A1 and requested them for money. A1 and A2 abused her in filthy language. A1 slapped on her cheek and they kicked in her stomach.

On 21-7-2017, she went to the Police Station and gave oral statement to

Police. Actually, she went to Police Station on 17-7-2017 and gave written complaint to Head Constable by name Jaya Ram, he did not register the case. After four days again she went to the Police Station and gave oral statement.

PW.5 deposed that he received complaint and registered the case in

Cr.No.112/2017. P.W.6 deposed that he recorded the statements of witnesses and drafted rough sketch.

13. On perusal of P.W.4 evidence, she merely deposed that A1 and A2 abused her in filthy language. She did not depose any such filthy language before the Court in order to ascertain whether the said language is abusive insulting the modesty of a woman. There is no other evidence supporting the case of the prosecution that A1 and A2 abused PW.1 in filthy language.

14. It is the case of the prosecution that A1 and A2 beat PW.1 with hands and legs. PW.4 during her evidence deposed that only A1 slapped on her cheek and kicked in the stomach. Thus, P.W.4 who is the victim did not support case of prosecution that A2 beat her. P.W.4 failed to support case of prosecution in clear terms. Further, PW.4 lodged report on 21-7- 2017 with a delay of four days and explained that on 17-7-2021 she gave written complaint and one Head Constable by name Jayaram, did not register the complaint. But P.W.1 did not state such fact in Ex.P1 or did not file any receipt issued by Police after receiving written complaint to substantiate her reason for delay. From the above discussion, this court opines that the evidence of PW.1 is not free from suspicion. Hence, this court holds that the prosecution failed to bring home the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt for the offences punishable u/Secs.323, 509 r/w. 34 of IPC. Point is answered in favour of the accused.

15. In the result, A1 and A2 are found not guilty for the offences u/secs.323, 509 r/w. 34 of IPC and accordingly they are acquitted in terms u/Sec.248(1) of Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the accused are ordered to be in force for a period of six months along with surety bonds as per

Section 437-A of Cr.P.C. Un-marked case property shall be destroyed after expiry of appeal time.

Dictated and typed to my dictation and dictated to the Stenographer Grade-I,

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 17 th day of October, 2023.

Sd/- Smt.V.V.N.V.Lakshmi

II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni F/A/C I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class Adoni.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For ComplainantFor Defence

Pw1: Yerukali Bheemalingapa None Pw2: Yerukali Mahadeva Pw3: Yerukali Raghavendra Pw4: Y.Hanumanthamma @ Ananthi Pw5: S.Thimma Reddy

PW6: T.Babu, Sub Inspector of Police, Adoni I Town Police Station.

DOCUMENTS MARKED

For Complainant

Ex.P.1: Sec.161 Cr.P.C.Statement of P.W.1 Ex.P.2: Sec.161 Cr.P.C.Statement of P.W.2. Ex.P.3: Sec.161 Cr.P.C.Statement of P.W.3 Ex.P.4: Statement of P.W.4 Ex.P.5: FIR. Ex.P.6: Rough sketch.

For Defence: Nil.

Material objects

Nil

Sd/- Smt.V.V.N.V.Lakshmi

II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni F/A/C I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class Adoni.

//True Copy//

II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni F/A/C I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class Adoni.

CALENDER AND JUDGMENT

IN THE COURT OF I ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS :: ADONI.

C.C.No.498/2017

1Date of Offence17-07-2017 2Date of Complaint21-07-2017 3Date of apprehension of the accused Sec.41-A Cr.P.C. notice served 4Date of release on bail-- 5Date of Commencement of Trial23-01-2023 6Date of Close of Trial11-10-2023 7Date of Judgment17-10-2023

Calendar and Judgment in C.C.No.498/2017

On the file of I Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni.

ComplainantSub Inspector of Police, Adoni I Town Police Station in Cr.No.112/2017 of Adoni I Town Police Station. Accused1. Mandla Venkatesh, S/o.Rogenna, Aged 30 years,

2. Mandla Eswaramma @ Lalitha, W/o. M.Venkatesh, Aged 26 years,

Both are the residents of Hanuman Nagar, near Koravanjanamma Temple, Adoni Town. Section of LawU/Secs.323, 509 r/w. 34 of IPC.

FindingA1 and A2 are found not guilty for the offences U/Secs.323, 509 r/w. 34 of IPC. Sentence of In the result, A1 and A2 are found not guilty for the offences Orderu/secs.323, 509 r/w. 34 of IPC and accordingly they are acquitted in terms u/Sec.248(1) of Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the accused are ordered to be in force for a period of six months along with surety bonds as per Section 437-A of Cr.P.C. Un- marked case property shall be destroyed after expiry of appeal time.

/ ue /-

Sd/- Smt.V.V.N.V.Lakshmi

II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni F/A/C I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class Adoni.

CIAL MAGISTRATE OF I-CLAS

Copy submitted to: The Hon’ble Chief-Judicial Magistrate-Cum-

Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Kurnool.

//True Copy//

II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni F/A/C I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class Adoni.

CC/649/2017 Acquitted

The SHO Adoni I Town P.S. vs P.Govardhan Reddy@H.B.Govardhan Reddy

20 Oct 2023

IN THE COURT OF I ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST

CLASS, ADONI

Present: Smt. V.V.N.V. Lakshmi

II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Adoni

F/A/C I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni.

Friday, the 20 th day of October, 2023

C.C.649/2017

Between : State: Inspector of Police, Adoni I Town Police Station.

.... Complainant

And

P.Govardhan Reddy @ H.B.Govardhan Reddy, S/o.H.B.Veera Reddy, Aged 32 years, H.No.16/66, Near Basapuram Road, Adoni Town.

.... Accused

This case coming before me for final hearing on 13-10-2023 in the presence of APP for State and of Sri.R.Ravi Swamy and Sri.V.Mallikarjuna, Advocates for Accused; and upon hearing both sides and the matter having stood upon for consideration to this day, this court delivered the following:

:: JUDGMENT ::

01.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Adoni I Town Police Station, filed charge sheet against accused in Crime No.107/2017 for the offences punishable under Sections 506, 509 IPC.

02. In brief, the case of the prosecution as unfolded in the charge sheet is stated as follows:

That L.W.1-Boya Seshamma is a resident of Town and she is living by running a hotel near Basapuram Road, opposite to Market Yard, Adoni.

The said hotel is situated in Sy.No.135A2, 135B2 and 136B2 is belongs to

Agro Industries Corporation in an extent of Ac.2.37 cents. The accused took said land on lease for 11 months from Agro Industries Corporation.

The de-facto complainant/LW.1 along with LWs.2 to 4 were also running their hotels in the same land since 35 years and they also asked the said

Agro Industries for lease, but they said that there is no lease agreement between them and accused. While so, on 07-7-2017, at 11.00 hours, the accused abused LW.1 in filthy language and also threatened her with dire consequences and the accused also threatened LWs.2 to 5.

03. Basing on the statement of L.W.1, L.W.6-T.Babu, Sub Inspector of

Police, Adoni I Town Police Station registered it as a case in Crime

No.107/2017 under Sections 506, 509 and investigated into. During the course of investigation, L.W.6 examined L.Ws.1 to 5 and recorded their statements and also drawn the rough sketch of scene of offence.

On 26-7-2017, LW.6 served Sec.41-A Cr.P.C. notice and after completion of investigation, he filed charge sheet against the accused.

Hence, the charge.

04.This case was taken on file against the accused for the offences punishable under Sections 506, 509 of IPC.

05.After appearance of the accused case copies and relevant documents were furnished to them as contemplated under section 207 of

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.

06.Accused were examined under section 239 of Cr.P.C. Charge under

Sections 506, 509 of IPC was framed, read over and explained to him in

Telugu, for which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

07.To substantiate its case, the prosecution examined P.Ws.1 to 4 and got marked Exs.P1 to P3 on its behalf. No witnesses were examined and no documents were marked on behalf of the defence.

08.After completing the evidence of prosecution, the accused was examined under Sec.313 of Cr.P.C., in respect of the incriminating evidence available in the prosecution evidence. The substance of the incriminating evidence was read over and explained to the accused in

Telugu, to which accused denied the evidence and reported no defence evidence on their side.

09.Now the point for determination is:

Whether the prosecution has proved the guilt of Accused

beyond reasonable doubt for the offences u/Secs.506, 509 of

IPC?

Point:

10. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor argued that it is the case where accused threatened and abused P.W.1. To prove the case of the prosecution, prosecution has examined P.Ws.1 to 4 and got marked Exs.P1 to P3. The evidence of P.Ws.1 to 3 is consistent with each other and categorically supported the case of prosecution and their evidence is corroborated with Exs.P1 to P3. Prosecution by examining PWs.1 to 4 and by marking Exs.P1 to P3 established its case against the accuse beyond reasonable doubt for the offences punishable u/Secs.506, 509 of IPC and hence, prayed this Hon’ble Court to convict the accused.

11. Defence counsel argued that accused was falsely implicated in this case and he is innocent. PWs.1 to 3 deposed in inconsistent manner, even

PW.1 deposed that one year prior to registering of the case, accused threatened her to vacate the place. Thus, offence is not related to present threat. P.W.1 did not depose any alleged abusive language said to be used by accused. Prosecution failed to establish its case against 4 beyond reasonable doubt for the offences punishable u/Secs.506, 509 of

IPC and hence, prayed this Hon’ble Court to acquit the accused.

12. In brief, it is the case of the prosecution that on 07-7-2017, at 11.00 hours, accused abused PW.1 in filthy language and also threatened her with dire consequences.

P.W.1 during her evidence deposed that one year prior to lodging of the case, accused threatened her to vacate the place as he obtained land on lease and also threatened her if she failed to vacate the same, he will see her end. During cross examination, PW.1 deposed herself along with 10 others went to the Police Station, police took her signature on a white blank paper and she does not know what was written by Police in white blank paper. Thus, PW.1 herself admitted she does not know the contents of Ex.P1 i.e., written complaint said to be filed by her. On keen perusal of

PW.1 evidence, she did not depose any abusive language alleged to be used by accused towards her. She also deposed that one year prior to lodging of the case, accused threatened her. She did not depose any alleged fact that on 7-7-2017, accused threatened her. Thus, P.W.1 failed to support the case of the prosecution.

PWs.2 and 3 deposed that on 7-7-2017 at about 11.00 am while they were at their hotel, accused threatened PW.1 and abused PW.1 in filthy language. Even P.Ws.2 and 3 did not depose the language used by accused towards P.W.1 in order to ascertain that language is abusive in nature insulting the modesty of a woman. Thus, prosecution failed to bring home the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt for the offence punishable u/Sec.509 of IPC.

13. It is the case of the prosecution that accused threatened PW.1 on 7-7-2017 at 11.00 am. P.W.1 herself failed to support the case of the 5 prosecution. P.Ws.2 and 3 merely deposed that accused threatened P.W.1 but did not depose how the accused had given threat to P.W.1 in order to ascertain whether same is criminal intimidation or not. Hence, prosecution failed to bring home the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt for the offence punishable u/Sec.506 of IPC and accused is entitled for acquittal for the offence punishable u/Sec.506 of IPC.

Dictated and typed to my dictation and dictated to the Stenographer Grade-I,

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 20 th day of October, 2023.

Sd/- Smt.V.V.N.V.Lakshmi

II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni F/A/C I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class Adoni.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Complainant For Defence

Pw1: Boya Sheshamma None Pw2: Padmasale Raju Pw3: Padmasale Sathyanarayana Pw4: T.Babu, Sub Inspector of Police, Adoni I Town Police Station.

DOCUMENTS MARKED

For Complainant For Defence

Ex.P.1: Report of PW.1. Nil. Ex.P.2: F.I.R. Ex.P.3: Rough sketch.

Sd/- Smt.V.V.N.V.Lakshmi

II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni F/A/C I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class Adoni.

CALENDER AND JUDGMENT

IN THE COURT OF I ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS ::

ADONI.

C.C.No.649/2017

1Date of Offence07-07-2017 2Date of Complaint09-07-2017 3Date of apprehension of the accusedSec.41-A Cr.P.C. notice served 4Date of release on bail-- 5Date of Commencement of Trial23-06-2023 6Date of Close of Trial12-10-2023 7Date of Judgment20-10-2023 6

Calendar and Judgment in C.C.No.649/2017

On the file of I Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni.

ComplainantSub Inspector of Police, Adoni I Town Police Station in Cr.No.107/2017 of Adoni I Town Police Station. AccusedP.Govardhan Reddy @ H.B.Govardhan Reddy, S/o.H.B.Veera Reddy, Aged 32 years, H.No.16/66, Near Basapuram Road, Adoni Town. Section of U/Secs.506, 509 of IPC. Law FindingAccused found not guilty for the offences U/Secs.506, 509 of IPC. Sentence of In the result, Accused is found not guilty for the offences u/secs.506, 509 of IPC and accordingly he is Order acquitted in terms u/Sec.248(1) of Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the accused are ordered to be in force for a period of six months along with surety bonds as per Section 437-A of Cr.P.C. Un-marked case property shall be destroyed after expiry of appeal time.

//-

Sd/- Smt.V.V.N.V.Lakshmi

II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni F/A/C I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class Adoni.

CIAL MAGISTRATE OF I- CLAS

Copy submitted to: The Hon’ble Chief-Judicial Magistrate-Cum-

Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Kurnool.

CC/257/2020 Acquitted

Sub Inspector of Police, Adoni II Town PS vs Megati Hanumanthu

02 May 2023

IN THE COURT OF I ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

ADONI.

PRESENT: Smt.V.V.N.V.Lakshmi,

II Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni.

FAC I Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni.

Tuesday, the 02 nd Day of May, 2023

C.C.No.257/2020

Between : State: The Sub-Inspector of Police, Adoni II Police Station.

.... Complainant

Megati Hanumanthu, S/o. Late Laxmanna, Dibbanakallu village, aged 50 years, Adoni Mandal.

....Accused

This case coming before me for final hearing on 02-05-2023 in the presence of Sr.APP for State and Sri.N.Ramanjineyulu, Advocate, for accused anduponhearingbothsidesandthematterhaving stood upon for consideration to this day, this court delivered the following:

:: JUDGMENT ::

01.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Adoni II Town Police Station, filed charge sheet against the accused in Crime No.143/2019 for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324 and 326 of IPC.

02. In brief, the case of the prosecution as unfolded in the charge sheet is stated as follows:

L.W.1 Govindarajulu Malagaveli is resident of M.AgraharamVillage of

Maddikera Mandal and accused is resident of Dibbankallu village, Adoni

Mandal. There is a dispute in between LW.1 and the accused with regard about two months back LW.3 got village voluntary job of Dinnakallu village, dueto that the accused keeping bore grudges in his mindand on 1 28-10-2019 the concerned Sachivalayam village officers held meeting at

Dibbanakal village, due to ill health LW.3 did not attend the said meeting and

A1 un-necessarily spread rumours the character of LW.3 by saying that as she eloped with other person.

Subsequently on 05-11-2019 LWs.1 and 2 went to Dibbanakallu village and enquired about the accused in the village. They learnt that the accused went to to Adoni New RTC bus stand and evening at about 3.00 PM, LWs.1 and 2 went to new RTC BUS stand Adoni Town along with LW.3 and LW.4, at that time the accused came to LWs.1 to 4 picked up quarrel with them and abused by saying as “why are you making enquiry about him at his village”.

Subsequently,LW.1 questioned to A1 why he spread rumours on the character of LW.3. Then A1 beat LW.1 with motorcycle keys on his fore head and also beat LW.1. with hands and legs, as a result, LW.1 sustained injuries and on seeing the same, LWs.2 to 9 came and rescued L.W.1 and 2 from the hands of accused.

03.Basing on the written report of L.W.1, LW.11-T.Abdul Ghouse, Inspector of Police Adoni II Town P.S. registered it as a case in Crime No.143/2019 under Sections 323, 324,326 of IPC. During the course of the investigation, he examined L.Ws.1 to 9 and recorded their Sec.161(3) Cr.P.C. statements.

On the same day of offence he visited the scene of offence and drafted rough sketch of scene of offence. On 10-02-2020, L.W.12-D.Narasimha

Murthy, Sub Inspector of Police, Adoni II Town Police Station verified the investigation done by L.W.11 and served Sec.41-A Cr.P.C.notice to the accused.

LW.10-Dr.K.Naveen Kumar, Medical Officer, Adoni, Government Area

Hospital, Adoniexamined LW.1 and issued wound certificate to LW.1 by opining that the injury No.1 sustained by LW.1 is simple in nature and Injury 2

No.2 is grievous in nature.After completion of investigation, LW.12 filed charge sheet. Hence, the charge.

04.This case was taken on file against the accused for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 326 of IPC.

05.After appearance of the accused case copies and relevant documents were furnished to them as contemplated under section 207 of Criminal

Procedure Code, 1973.

06.Accusedis examined under section 239 of Cr.P.C. Charge under

Sections 323, 324, 326 of IPC was framed, read over and explained to him in Telugu, for which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

07.To substantiate its case, the prosecution examined P.ws.1 to 6 and got marked Exs.P1 to P7 on its behalf. No defence witnesses were examined and no documents were marked on behalf of the accused. LearnedAssistant

Public Prosecutor has given up the evidence of L.Ws.5,7, 9 to 12.

08.The examination u/Sec.313 Cr.P.C. examination was dispensed with as there is no incriminating material in prosecution evidence appeared against the accused.

09.Now the point for determination is:

Whether the prosecution has proved the guilt of A1 to A6

beyond reasonable doubt for the offences punishable under Section

323, 324, 326 r/w. 34 IPC?

Point:

10.In brief, it is the case of the prosecution that on 05-11-2019 accused beat PW.1 with motor cycle keys on his forehead and also abused by saying as “why are you making enquiry about him at his village”.

In support of case of prosecution, P.Ws.1 to 6 were examined.P.W.1 deposed that he does not know anything about the facts of this case and he sustained injuries when he fallen down.He further deposed that accused never beat him and he merely affixed his thumb impression on some papers at Police Station and he does not know its contents.

P.W.2 to PW.6 deposed that they do not know anything about the facts of this case and Police did not examine them.

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor sought to put the questions that may be put in cross examination to P.Ws.1 to 6 and same is permitted but, nothing worthwhile was elicited from P.Ws.1 to 6 in their cross examination.

In view of above evidence, learned Asst. Public Prosecutor chosen to given up the evidence of other witnesses.Thus, absolutely P.Ws.1 to 6 failed to support the case of the prosecution in clear and cogent terms that accused beat P.W.1 which creates doubt on the veracity of prosecution case. Hence, this court is inclined to acquit the accused. Point is answered in favour of accused.

11.In the result, accused is found not guilty for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 326 of IPC and accordingly they are acquitted in terms of Section 248 (1) of Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the accused are ordered to be in force for a period of six months along with the surety bonds as per

Section 437-A of Cr.P.C. Un-marked case property if any shall be destroyed after expiry of appeal time.

Typed to my dictation to the Typist, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 2ndday of May, 2023.

/-

sd- V.V.N.V.LAKSHMI

II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni. FAC I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For ComplainantFor Defence

Pw1: Govinda RajuluNone

Pw2: Vijay lakshmi

Pw3: Nagarajulu

Pw4: Indraja

Pw5: Sardhar

Pw6: Veeresh

DOCUMENTS MARKED

For ComplainantFor Defence

Ex.P.1: Signature of PW.1 on the report.Nil.

Ex.P.2: Sec.161 Cr.P.C. statement of P.W.1

Ex.P.3: Sec.161 Cr.P.C. statement of P.W.2

Ex.P.4: Sec.161 Cr.P.C. statement of P.W.3

Ex.P.5: Sec.161 Cr.P.C. statement of P.W.4

Ex.P.6: Sec.161 Cr.P.C. statement of P.W.5

Ex.P.7: Sec.161 Cr.P.C. statement of P.W.6

sd/- V.V.N.V.LAKSHMI

II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni. FAC I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni.

//True copy//

II AJMFC, Adoni FAC IAJMFC, Adoni 5

CALENDER AND JUDGMENT

IN THE COURT OF I ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS :: ADONI.

C.C.No.257/2020

1Date of Offence07-11-2019 2Date of Complaint07-11-2019 3Date of apprehension of the accusedSec.41-A Cr.P.C. notice served 4Date of release on bail-- 5Date of Commencement of Trial02-05-2023 6Date of Close of Trial02-05-2023 7Date of Judgment02-05-2023

Calendar and Judgment in C.C.No.257/2020

On the file of I Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni.

ComplainantSub Inspector of Police, Adoni II P.S. Cr.No.143/2019. AccusedMegati Hanumanthu, S/o. Late Laxmanna, Dibbanakallu village, aged 50 years, Adoni Mandal Section of LawU/Secs. 323, 324, 326 of IPC FindingAccused is found not guilty for the offences Sections 323, 324, 326 of IPC. Sentence ofIn the result, accused is found not guilty for the offences OrderpunishableunderSections323,324,326ofIPCand accordingly they are acquitted in terms of Section 248 (1) of Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of accused are ordered to be in force for a period of six months along with the surety bonds as per Section 437-A of Cr.P.C. Un-marked case property if any shall be destroyed after expiry of appeal time // True Cpy //

II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni. FAC I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni.

CIAL MAGISTRATE O F I-S

Copy submitted to: The Hon’ble Chief-Judicial Magistrate-Cum-

Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Kurnool.

OS/323/2023

KOSIGI RAMANJINI vs NADIGENI EEREDDY

16 Nov 2023

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ADONI

Present: Smt. V.V.N.V.Lakshmi, II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Adoni F/A/C. I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Adoni

Thursday, the 16 th day of November, 2023

O.S.No.323/2023

Kosigi Ramanjini, S/o.Kosigi Harijana Chowtappa, Aged about 40 years, Agriculturist, Resident of Kosigi Village and Mandal. …Plaintif

Versus

Nadigeni Eereddy, S/o. late Nadigeni Eranna, Aged about 52 years, Hindu, Business, Resident of Vandagallu Vilalge, Kosigi Mandal … Defendant

This suit coming on this day i.e., on 08-11-2023 before me in the presence of Sri.D.Nagendra, Advocate, for the plaintif and the defendant remained exparte; and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, the Court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

01. The present suit was filed by the plaintif praying this Hon’ble Court to pass a decree in his favour for recovery of suit amount of Rs.97,200/- from the defendant along with the interest thereon.

THE BRIEF FACTS OF THE PLAINTIFF CASE ARE AS FOLLOWS:

02. That 17-12-2020, the defendant has borrowed an amount of

Rs.60,000/- from the plaintif at Kosigi, agreeing to repay the same with interest at the rate of 30% per annum and executed suit promissory note in favour of the plaintif but now the plaintif claiming interest at the rate of 24% per annum only.

In spite of repeated oral demands made by the plaintif, the defendant did not pay either principal or interest amount to the plaintif. For which, the plaintif got issued legal notice to the defendant on 26-6-2023 and the same was received by the defendant but he did not pay the debt amount to the plaintif. Hence, the suit.

03. Summons served to the defendant personally and defendant called absent. No representation. Hence, Defendant set exparte on 10-10-2023.

04. To prove his case, plaintif examined P.W.1 and got marked Exs.A1 to

A3.

05. Heard arguments on plaintif side.

06. Now the point for determination is:

Whether the plaintif is entitled to recover the suit promissory note debt along with interest there on as prayed for?

Point:

07. In brief, it is the case of the plaintif that on 17-12-2020, the defendant borrowed amount of Rs.60,000/- under suit promissory note agreeing to repay the same with interest at 30% per annum and failed to repay the same. To prove his case, plaintif examined as P.W.1. P.W.1 in his evidence supported the case of plaintif in all respects. Defendant failed to cross examine P.W.1 and the evidence of P.W.1 remained un-challenged. In support of his case, plaintif also exhibited Exs.A1 to A3 before this Court. Ex.A1 is the original promissory note dated 17-12-2020 for Rs.60,000/- showing that the defendant has borrowed the said amount from the plaintif under suit promissory note. Ex.A2 is office copy of the legal notice dated 26-6-2023 divulges that plaintif duly demanded for repayment of debt. Ex.A3 is the website copy of track consignment dated 1-7-2023. Defendant failed to contest the matter and the documentary evidence in this case stood un- shattered. From the un-challenged testimony of P.W.1 coupled with documentary evidence Exs.A1 to A3, this Court holds that the plaintif established his case that on 17-12-2020 the defendant has borrowed amounts of Rs.60,000/- under suit promissory note and failed to repay the same along with interest and hence, the plaintif is entitled to the relief as claimed for. Point is answered in favour of plaintif.

08. In the result, this suit is decreed with costs in favour of the plaintif directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.97,200/- together with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of suit to till the date of decree and thereafter @ 6% per annum from the date of decree to till the date of realization on principal amount of Rs.60,000/-.

Typed to my dictation to the Stenographer Grade-I, transcribed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 16 th day of November, 2023.

II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Adoni.

F/A/C I Additional Junior Civil Judge,

Adoni.

Appendix of Evidence

For Plaintiff: For Defendant:

PW1: Kosigi Ramanjini Exparte

Exhibits Marked

For Plaintiff: For Defendant:

Ex.A1: Promissory note dated 17-12-2020 executed Exparte by defendant for a sum of Rs.60,000/- in favour of plaintif.

Ex.A2: Office copy of the legal notice dated 26-6-2023.

Ex.A3: Website copy of track consignment dated 1-7-2023.

II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Adoni.

F/A/C I Additional Junior Civil Judge,

Adoni.

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ADONI

Present: Smt. V.V.N.V.Lakshmi, II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Adoni

F/A/C. I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Adoni

Thursday, the 16 th day of November, 2023

O.S.No.323/2023

Kosigi Ramanjini, S/o.Kosigi Harijana Chowtappa, Aged about 40 years, Agriculturist, Resident of Kosigi Village and Mandal. …Plaintif

Versus

Nadigeni Eereddy, S/o. late Nadigeni Eranna, Aged about 52 years, Hindu, Business, Resident of Vandagallu Vilalge, Kosigi Mandal … Defendant

The present suit was filed by the plaintif praying this Hon’ble Court to pass a decree in his favour for recovery of suit amount of Rs.97,200/- from the defendant along with the interest thereon.

Plaint presented on 25-8-2023 and numbered on 02-09-2023. Jurisdiction

Value of the suit is Rs.98,120/- and Court fee of Rs.3426/- is paid u/Sec. 20 of APCF & SV Act, 1956.

Cause of action arose on 17-12-2020, when the defendant borrowed the amount from the plaintif at Kosigi village and executed promissory note in favour of the plaintif and on all the subsequent dates when the plaintif demanded the defendant to pay the debt amount.

This suit coming on this day i.e., on 08-11-2023 before me in the presence of Sri.D.Nagendra, Advocate, for the plaintif and the defendant remained exparte, this Court doth ordered and decreed as follows:

DECREE

1) That the suit be and the same is hereby decreed in favour of the plaintif and against the defendant;

2) That the defendant do pay to the plaintif a sum of Rs.97,200/- together with subsequent interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree to till the date of realization on the principal amount of Rs.60,000/-; and

3) That the defendant do also pay to the plaintif Rs.3498/- towards costs of the suit.

Given under my hand and the seal of the Court, this the 16th day of November, 2023.

II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Adoni.

F/A/C I Additional Junior Civil Judge,

Adoni.

Memo of Costs

For Plaintif (Rs.)For Defendant (Rs.) ============================== == Stamp on plaint3426-000-00 Stamp on vakalat2-002-00 Stamp on process70-000-00 Advocate fee(nil not filed)0-00 ============================== == Totals (Rs.)3498-00 2-00 ============================== ==

II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Adoni.

F/A/C I Additional Junior Civil Judge,

Adoni.

Order Record 159 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OS/323/2023	KOSIGI RAMANJINI vs NADIGENI EEREDDY	16 Nov 2023	Judgment	—
OS/299/2023	A. PADMAVATHI vs DODDA LAKSHMINARAYANA	15 Nov 2023	Judgment	—
MC/56/2022	Chillale Shravani vs J.Yuvaraj	14 Nov 2023	Order	—
CC/956/2022	Adoni III Town Ps vs G.Mohd.Ghouse Peer	26 Oct 2023	Judgment	Acquitted
CC/649/2017	The SHO Adoni I Town P.S. vs P.Govardhan Reddy@H.B.Govardhan Reddy	20 Oct 2023	Judgment	Acquitted
CC/168/2023	K.Srihari vs M/s.Satya Agritech	17 Oct 2023	Order	—
CC/498/2017	The SHO Adoni I Town P.S. vs Madla Venkatesh and another	17 Oct 2023	Judgment	Acquitted
CC/503/2017	The SHO Adoni Taluk P.S. vs V.Sanjeeva Rao	16 Oct 2023	Judgment	—
CC/360/2017	The SHO Adoni II Town P.S. vs Golla Venkatesh - This is a split up case from CC.403/2011 against A2 only	13 Oct 2023	Judgment	—
CC/672/2012	Santhosh Kolhar vs Darji ayub	09 Oct 2023	Judgment	—
CC/225/2017	SHO Adoni III Town P.S. vs C.Chandra Sekhar	06 Oct 2023	Judgment	—
OS/140/2023	BOYA MAHADEVA vs MULINTI SHAMBULINGAPPA	29 Sep 2023	Judgment	—
OS/143/2023	KURUBA NARASIMHULU vs MULINTI SHAMBULINGAPPA	29 Sep 2023	Judgment	—
CC/1361/2022	K.Mallikarjuna vs Mamidi Srinivasulu	26 Sep 2023	Judgment	—
OS/32/2023	PINJARI KHASIM SAB AND 2-OTHERS vs DUBBA SHANTHA ALIAS SHANTHA AND 2-OTHERS	21 Sep 2023	Judgment	—
OS/167/2023	SHAIK KHAIRUNNISA SABI AND 4-OTHERS vs R.JEELANI BASHA AND 2-OTHERS	21 Sep 2023	Judgment	—
OS/248/2021	Ramesh Chris Stephen Mairo vs K.Ravindra	20 Sep 2023	Judgment	—
CC/324/2017	The SHO Adoni II Town P.S. vs Thimmapuram Narayana and another	20 Sep 2023	Judgment	—
DVC/8/2017	Haseena vs K.Sheikshavali and 12 others	20 Sep 2023	Judgment	—
CC/13/2016	S.Govindarajulu vs P.Basavaraj Goud	19 Sep 2023	Judgment	—
CC/253/2017	SHO Adoni I Town P.S. vs Vadde Kuridi Kishore@Kuridi Kishore Kumar and 2 others	19 Sep 2023	Judgment	—
DVC/12/2022	C.Syda Mateen vs J.Sajid Hussain	19 Sep 2023	Order	—
MC/25/2022	C.Syeda Mateen vs J.Sajid Jussain	19 Sep 2023	Order	—
OS/173/2020	K.Buddappa vs K.George	16 Sep 2023	Judgment	—
OS/341/2019	M.Riyaz Ahmed vs M.Mahaboob bee	15 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/121/2015	D.Srinivasulu, Branch Manager, LIC, Adoni vs Smt. Sugali Lakshmi	14 Sep 2023	Judgment	—
OS/98/2023	B. LAKSHMIDEVI vs BOYA KOTHINTI BASAVARAJU	13 Sep 2023	Judgment	—
OS/119/2020	T.Suresh Babu vs Ediga Gopal	11 Sep 2023	Judgment	—
OS/158/2022	SAMMATHAGERI NAGESHAMMA vs HARIJANA URUKUNDU AND 3-OTHERS	11 Sep 2023	Judgment	—
CC/334/2016	The Sub-Inspector of Police, Adoni I Town P.S. vs Ashok Bandare and 3 others	11 Sep 2023	Judgment	—
OS/125/2023	B. NARASIMHULU vs B.RAGHAVENDRA	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
OS/212/2020	K.Sartaj Begum vs M.Musthaq Ahmed	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
OS/284/2022	NEELI SATISH KUMAR AND 3-OTHERS vs N. NIRMALA AND 2-OTHERS	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/15/2018	The SHO Taluk P.S. vs Golla Bheemanna and 3 others	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/54/2018	The SHO Adoni III town P.S. vs Yerukala Ramanjineyulu and 4 others	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/137/2018	The SHO Adoni III Town P.S. vs N.Santhosh Kumar and 5 others	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/180/2023	Adoni I Town PS vs B.Anil	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/205/2022	THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ADONI II TOWN PS. vs M. Raghavendra and Two others	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/210/2023	Adoni II Town PS vs U.Murali Krishna	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/264/2023	Adoni III Town PS vs R.Karthik	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/268/2023	Adoni Traffic PS vs Kosigi Huse Basha @ Shaik Usen Basha	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/359/2023	Adoni III Town PS vs Valmiki Ramachandra	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/360/2023	Adoni III Town PS vs Jumapet Mahammad Julfakeer @ Jilani	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/361/2023	Adoni III Town PS vs Mandula Eranna	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/368/2023	Adoni III Town PS vs Kuruva Kishore Kumar	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/369/2023	Adoni II Town PS vs P.Babu @ Nesay Babu	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/387/2023	Adoni II Town PS vs Mohammed Azaruddin	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/390/2023	Adoni III Town PS vs B.Bhaskar	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/409/2023	Adoni II Town PS vs V Md.Zaheeruddin	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/410/2023	Adoni II Town PS vs Prabhu	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/411/2023	Adoni III Town PS vs Patan Mansoor	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/422/2023	Adoni III Town PS vs B.Ramakrishna	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/423/2023	Adoni III Town PS vs M.Kumar	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/424/2023	Adoni I Town PS vs Narayanpeta Ismail	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/433/2023	Adoni I Town Ps vs Madiga Maremma	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/442/2023	Adoni I Town PS vs Thanda Suraj	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/443/2023	Adoni I Town PS vs Guharathi Devraj	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/456/2023	Adoni III Town PS vs Shaikshavali	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/457/2023	Adoni I Town PS vs Dommeti Sathranarayana	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/458/2023	Adoni I Town PS vs Vaska Rambabu	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/459/2023	Adoni II Town PS vs Thondapadu Harikrishna	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/460/2023	Adoni II Town PS vs Avula Veera Sekhar @ Boya Veera Sekhar @ Boya Sekhar	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/461/2023	Adoni I Town PS vs M.Manjunath	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/462/2023	Adoni I Town PS vs Ganjigatta Chandrahas	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/463/2023	Adoni II Town PS vs Mahaboob Basha @ Sharu @ Bandi Basha	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/464/2023	Adoni II Town PS vs Shadab Masarrat(A2)	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/465/2023	Adoni I Town PS vs Boya Chiranjeevi @ Chinna	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/547/2022	Inspector of Police, Adoni I Town UPS vs Rakesh Prasad Mishra and 4 others	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/586/2014	M.Veena @ Sahithi vs K.Meghanath Reddy and 2 others	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/652/2017	The SHO Adoni II Town P.S. vs Dandannagari Siddesh	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/779/2022	Adoni II Town PS vs Buduru Virupakshi Reddy	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/1029/2022	SHO, ADONI TALUK PS vs KITAKA RAJA SAB	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/1174/2022	SHO,Adoni Traffic P.S. vs Darji Shaik Mukthar	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
CC/1187/2022	SHO, Adoni I Town P.S. vs Sale Rangaswamy	09 Sep 2023	Order	—
OS/407/2022	S. AMALA vs BINGI RAM MURTHY AND ANOTHER	04 Sep 2023	Judgment	—
CC/129/2017	SHO Adoni II Town P.S. vs A.Vinod Kumar@Syed Sahiksha Vali	01 Sep 2023	Judgment	—
CC/373/2017	The SHO Adoni I Town P.S. vs Golla Gangadhar Reddy and 3 others	31 Aug 2023	Judgment	—
CC/63/2015	E.Prathap, Police Constable vs Pinjari Mohammed Ali and two others	30 Aug 2023	Judgment	—
CC/127/2016	Kurava Lakshmi vs Kuruva Mahadeva and two others	28 Aug 2023	Judgment	—
OS/125/2019	Dandu Sree Ramulu vs Mulla Taher Vali	19 Aug 2023	Judgment	—
MC/2/2023	Pallavi vs Kavali Vishwanth	08 Aug 2023	Order	—
CC/212/2020	S.I. of Police, Adoni Taluka P.S. vs Boya Laxmanna	03 Aug 2023	Judgment	—
MC/1/2023	Ghousia vs R.Mohammed Akbar @ Abrar	02 Aug 2023	Order	—
MC/38/2022	S.Venkamma @ Vaddemanu Venkamma vs S.Chinna Kumar	31 Jul 2023	Order	—
CC/28/2021	J.Ravi Kumar vs Kuruva Mahadeva	27 Jul 2023	Order	—
DVC/7/2019	Smt. Shaik Ameena vs S.Shaik Sahvali and 5 others	27 Jul 2023	Order	—
CC/655/2017	The SHO Adoni III Town P.S. vs G.Hareesh and 2 others	26 Jul 2023	Judgment	—
DVC/1/2016	Rajeswari and others vs Mahabaleswar a Raja	25 Jul 2023	Order	—
CC/763/2019	Srirama Raghavendra Chits (P) Ltd., Adoni rep by B.Sreekanth vs M.Premalatha	24 Jul 2023	Judgment	—
MC/34/2019	Smt. D.Haseena Bee and 2 others vs S.Hussain Basha @ Mohammad Hussain Desai	24 Jul 2023	Order	—
OS/95/2020	P.Indramma vs Kuruva Ragappa	22 Jul 2023	Judgment	—
DVC/5/2022	S.HARSHITHA vs S.GIRIDHAR AND 6-OTHERS	21 Jul 2023	Order	—
MC/17/2022	SMT. S. HARSHITHA vs S.GIRIDHAR	21 Jul 2023	Order	—
CC/622/2017	The Adoni II Town P.S. vs P.Balaraju and 5 others	18 Jul 2023	Judgment	—
OS/530/2022	REHIKA ESAYYA SANGAL AND 5-OTHERS vs PRAKASH KADARKAT AND 2-OTHERS	14 Jul 2023	Judgment	—
CC/166/2014	G.Jyoshna Devi vs Gajula Mallikarjuna	12 Jul 2023	Judgment	—
MC/2/2020	Smt. P.Pushpalatha vs Mana Pradeep Kumar	11 Jul 2023	Order	—
MC/35/2022	Barike Indira @Indu vs Kanba Boyala Umesh	07 Jul 2023	Order	—
CC/195/2018	SHO ADONI III TOWN P.S. vs R.Raju Rajeswari and 6 others	05 Jul 2023	Judgment	—
MC/33/2019	K.Lakshmi Devi @ Drakshayani vs K.Chandra Gowd	03 Jul 2023	Order	—

Showing 100 of 159 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Nov 2023		4
Oct 2023		8
Sep 2023		65
Aug 2023		7
Jul 2023		18
Jun 2023		28
May 2023		30

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Smt V.V.N.V.Lakshmi handled?

Smt V.V.N.V.Lakshmi has handled 160 court orders since 2023 at II Addl District Court Adoni. The average disposal rate is 23 orders per month.

What types of cases does Smt V.V.N.V.Lakshmi hear?

Based on available records, Smt V.V.N.V.Lakshmi primarily handles Criminal matters (Criminal Cases) and Civil matters (Original Suits) at II Addl District Court Adoni.

Where is Smt V.V.N.V.Lakshmi currently posted?

Smt V.V.N.V.Lakshmi is posted as Additional Junior Civil Judge at II Addl District Court Adoni, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Smt V.V.N.V.Lakshmi available online?

Yes. 6 judgments by Smt V.V.N.V.Lakshmi are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Smt V.V.N.V.Lakshmi dispose cases?

Smt V.V.N.V.Lakshmi disposes approximately 23 cases per month, based on 160 orders handled over their tenure at II Addl District Court Adoni.

Since when is Smt V.V.N.V.Lakshmi serving?

Smt V.V.N.V.Lakshmi has been serving at II Addl District Court Adoni since 2023.

Case Types

CC 66%

MC 13%

OS 13%

DVC 6%

PRC 2%

Posting History

Apr 2023 — Nov 2023

Additional Junior Civil Judge · 159 orders
Apr 2023 — May 2023

Additional Junior Civil Judge · 1 orders
Apr 2023 — May 2023

Principal Junior Civil Judge
Apr 2023 — May 2023

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

Outcomes on Record

Acquitted 4

Other Judges at this Court

D Lakshmi

II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

1 orders

Sri G. Yagna Narayana

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ADONI

594 orders

Sri M.Leela Sai Subhash

Additional Junior Civil Judge

1,920 orders

Smt.g.archana

Principal Junior Civil Judge

534 orders

← View all judges at II Addl District Court Adoni