Sri V.Vinay Kumar

TSBK020012272026

Presented on : 05-05-2026 Registered on : 05-05-2026 Decided on : 13-05-2026 Duration : 0 years, 0 months, 8 days

IN THE COURT OF

III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class ( Criminal Court for Agency areas),

Bhadradri Kothagudem.

AT ,BHADRADRI KOTHAGUDEM

(Presided Over by Sri V.Vinay Kumar)

CRLMP.BAIL/99/2026

Exhibit No. (PROSECUTION): Madivi Bhadraiah Through Police Station Officer , R/o. Marrigudem Village, Penagadapa Panchayati, Bhadradri Kothagudem District

BHADRADRI KOTHAGUDEM

Madivi Bhadraiah

VERSUS

: P S Kothagudem II Town Age: 0 Occupation : State through SHO, P.S. Kothagudem II Town,Rep. by Asst. Public Prosecutor,Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- APP for State }: MUMMADI PAVANI, Advocate for appearing for P S Kothagudem II Town Advocate appearing for , respectively. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Offence punishable under : 480 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

JUDGMENT

(Delivered on 13-05-2026)

ORDER

1. This is the first bail petition filed Under Section 480 BNSS by the Petitioner/accused with a prayer to grant bail. The Offence involved U/sec.331(4) and 305 of BNS. Notice given to learned APP and prayed time for counter. 2. Heard both sides. Perused the record. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner/ accused submitted that petitioner never committed any alleged offence and he is falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the investigation of the case is completed and material witness were examined and except filing of charge sheet and entire investigation is completed. 4. On the other hand the learned APP filed counter, the petitioner/accused released on bail he may be chance of skidding away from the eyesight of the police, he may commit further any offence, he may disappear or tampering and not cooperating to the investigating agency. 5. Perused the record. The above said accused is remanded to judicial custody on 23.04.2026 and since then he is in judicial custody. On perusal of the record, it is noticed that accused invloved in other crimes and as regards of the facts Cr.No.81/2024; Cr.No.105/2021 U/s.457, 380 of IPC of PS II Town, Kothagudem. Cr.No.64/2026; U/s.331(u), 305 of BNS of PS Kothagudem II Town, Cr.No.94/2024 U/s.457, 380 of IPC of PS Chandragunda, Cr.No.58/2021, Cr.No.30/2022, Cr.No.21/2022 U/s.457, 380 of IPC of PS Annapureddypally. 6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and detention of accused in judicial custody, this court is of the view that the investigation is still in progress and enlarging the accused on bail the accused may repeat further such offences and also hampers the investigation, there is every chance of tampering with evidence and accused may influence the witnesses. 7. Hence keeping in mind the nature of offence alleged against the accused this court is of the view that, if the petitioner/Accused is enlarged on bail, the petitioner/accused may involve in further committing of the similar offices and also there is a prospect of the interfering with further course of investigation may not be ruled out. Hence, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner Accused on bail. 8. In the result, Petition is dismissed.

Date : 13-05-2026

(Sri V.Vinay Kumar) III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class

( Criminal Court for Agency areas),

Bhadradri Kothagudem.

TSBK020012282026

Presented on : 05-05-2026 Registered on : 05-05-2026 Decided on : 13-05-2026 Duration : 0 years, 0 months, 8 days

IN THE COURT OF

III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class ( Criminal Court for Agency areas),

Bhadradri Kothagudem.

AT ,BHADRADRI KOTHAGUDEM

(Presided Over by Sri V.Vinay Kumar)

CRLMP.BAIL/100/2026

Exhibit No. (PROSECUTION): Sonthapuri Ramesh Through Police Station Officer , R/o.Subbampeta, Charla Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District

BHADRADRI KOTHAGUDEM

Sonthapuri Ramesh

VERSUS

: P S Paloncha Town Age: 0 Occupation : State through SHO, P.S. Paloncha Town,Rep. by Asst. Public Prosecutor, Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- APP for State }: MUMMADI PAVANI, Advocate for appearing for P S Paloncha Town Advocate appearing for , respectively. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Offence punishable under :

480 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

JUDGMENT

(Delivered on 13-05-2026)

ORDER

1. This is the first bail petition filed Under Section 480 BNSS by the Petitioner/accused with a prayer to grant bail. The Offence involved U/sec.305(b) of BNS. Notice given to learned APP and prayed time for counter. 2. Heard both sides. Perused the record. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner/ accused submitted that petitioner never committed any alleged offence and he is falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the investigation of the case is completed and material witness were examined and except filing of charge sheet and entire investigation is completed. 4. On the other hand the learned APP filed counter, the petitioner/accused released on bail he may be chance of skidding away from the eyesight of the police, he may commit further any offence, he may disappear or tampering and not cooperating to the investigating agency. 5. Perused the record. The above said accused is remanded to judicial custody on 08.04.2026 and since then he is in judicial custody. On perusal of the record, it is noticed that most of the investigation completed and examined the material witnesses. Petitioner has committed to theft of Hero Honda Passion Pro Motorcycle bearing No.AP 24 AF 8244 worth of Rs.60,000/-. 6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and detention of accused in judicial custody and also considering the circumstances of this court is of the view that, if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, it would not cause any prejudice to the investigation agency and also relying upon the Principle that bail is neither punitive nonpunishable. The Court is allowing the petition with the following conditions. 7. In the result, petitioner/accused shall be released on bail on executing bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for like sum each to the satisfaction of this court. 8. Furthermore, the petitioner/ accused shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which the accused shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police office or tamper with the evidence. 9. In the result, This petition is allowed.

Date : 13-05-2026

(Sri V.Vinay Kumar) III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class

( Criminal Court for Agency areas),

Bhadradri Kothagudem.

TSBK020012292026

Presented on : 05-05-2026 Registered on : 05-05-2026 Decided on : 13-05-2026 Duration : 0 years, 0 months, 8 days

IN THE COURT OF

III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class ( Criminal Court for Agency areas),

Bhadradri Kothagudem.

AT ,BHADRADRI KOTHAGUDEM

(Presided Over by Sri V.Vinay Kumar)

CRLMP.BAIL/101/2026

Exhibit No. (PROSECUTION): Sonthapuri Ramesh Through Police Station Officer , R/o.Subbampeta, Charla Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District

BHADRADRI KOTHAGUDEM

Sonthapuri Ramesh

VERSUS

: P S Paloncha Town Age: 0 Occupation : State through SHO, P.S, Paloncha Town,Rep. by Asst. Public Prosecutor, Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- APP for State }: MUMMADI PAVANI, Advocate for appearing for P S Paloncha Town Advocate appearing for , respectively. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Offence punishable under :

480 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, of , of , of ,

JUDGMENT

(Delivered on 13-05-2026)

ORDER

1. This is the first bail petition filed Under Section 480 BNSS by the Petitioner/accused with a prayer to grant bail. The Offence involved U/sec.305(b) of BNS. Notice given to learned APP and prayed time for counter. 2. Heard both sides. Perused the record. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner/ accused submitted that petitioner never committed any alleged offence and he is falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the investigation of the case is completed and material witness were examined and except filing of charge sheet and entire investigation is completed. 4. On the other hand the learned APP filed counter, the petitioner/accused released on bail he may be chance of skidding away from the eyesight of the police, he may commit further any offence, he may disappear or tampering and not cooperating to the investigating agency. 5. Perused the record. The above said accused is remanded to judicial custody on 24.03.2026 and since then he is in judicial custody. On perusal of the record, it is noticed that most of the investigation completed and examined the material witnesses. Petitioner has committed to theft of Hero Glamour Motorcycle bearing No.TS 28 E 2745 worth of Rs.60,000/-. 6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and detention of accused in judicial custody and also considering the circumstances of this court is of the view that, if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, it would not cause any prejudice to the investigation agency and also relying upon the Principle that bail is neither punitive nonpunishable. The Court is allowing the petition with the following conditions. 7. In the result, petitioner/accused shall be released on bail on executing bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for like sum each to the satisfaction of this court. 8. Furthermore, the petitioner/ accused shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which the accused shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police office or tamper with the evidence. 9. In the result, Thispetitionisallowed.

Date : 13-05-2026

(Sri V.Vinay Kumar) III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class

( Criminal Court for Agency areas),

Bhadradri Kothagudem.

TSBK020004642015

Presented on : 31-03-2015 Registered on : 31-03-2015 Decided on : 13-05-2026 Duration : 11 years, 1 months, 13 days

IN THE COURT OF

III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class ( Criminal Court for Agency areas),

Bhadradri Kothagudem.

AT ,BHADRADRI KOTHAGUDEM

(Presided Over by Sri V.Vinay Kumar)

CC/300112/2015

Exhibit No. (PROSECUTION):

SHO-PALONCHA TOWN.

Through Police Station Officer

, P.S. PALONCHA TOWN.

BHADRADRI KOTHAGUDEM

SHO-PALONCHA TOWN.

VERSUS

:

GUNTUPALLY GANESH AND ANOTHER

Age: 0 Occupation :

CHAVARAM EAST GODAVARI.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------- APP for State }: , Advocate for appearing for GUNTUPALLY GANESH AND ANOTHER Advocate appearing for , respectively. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Offence punishable under : U/S379IPC411IPC of INDIAN PENAL CODE,

JUDGMENT

(Delivered on 13-05-2026)

ORDER

In view of settlement arrived by the parties out of court who settled their matter amicably and considering the same it is fit case to refer to the daily Lok Adalath. Defacto complainant filed a memo stating that he compromised the matter. Defacto complainant by name Pamula Ravi Kumar and Accused are present and reported compromise and requested to refer the matter to Lok Adalath for settlement. Perused the record. It appears to me that there are bright chances of settlement of the matter before the LokAdalath.. Accordingly exercising my power and sec.19 and 20 of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987, I refer the matter to Lok Adalath and the matter may be placed before the DLSA for settlement. Accused and Complainant by name Pamula Ravi Kumar are present and they settled their case before the Lok Adalath amicably. The compromise is recorded. In pursuance of the compromise entered by the Defacto Complainant, accused are acquitted under sec.320(8) of Cr.P.C. for the offence punishable under Sec.379, 411 of IPC. As no case property was seized there shall no order as to disposal of case property.

Date : 13-05-2026

(Sri V.Vinay Kumar) III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class

( Criminal Court for Agency areas),

Bhadradri Kothagudem.

TSBK020004342015

Presented on : 08-04-2015 Registered on : 08-04-2015 Decided on : 13-05-2026 Duration : 11 years, 1 months, 5 days

IN THE COURT OF

III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class ( Criminal Court for Agency areas),

Bhadradri Kothagudem.

AT ,BHADRADRI KOTHAGUDEM

(Presided Over by Sri V.Vinay Kumar)

CC/300121/2015

Exhibit No. (PROSECUTION):

KADALI NARMADA

Through Police Station Officer , Priyadarshini colony,paloncha.

BHADRADRI KOTHAGUDEM

KADALI NARMADA

VERSUS

:

NUNAVATH LAXMAN

Age: 0 Occupation :

B-STATION,KTPS,PALONCHA.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------- APP for State }: v purushotham rao, Advocate for appearing for NUNAVATH LAXMAN Advocate appearing for , respectively. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Offence punishable under : U/S138OFNIACT of NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT,

JUDGMENT

(Delivered on 13-05-2026)

ORDER

Both parties called present. No representation from either sides. since the matter is posted for deposit of process and payment for issuing summons to bank manager from many adjournments matter kept passed over in call work and upon calling at 3.30 pm non appeared and process not filed. Hence dismissedfordefault.

Date : 13-05-2026

(Sri V.Vinay Kumar) III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class

( Criminal Court for Agency areas),

Bhadradri Kothagudem.