Y Bennayya Naidu

Prl. Senior Civil Judge

XI Addl. District Court (FTC), Tenali (Taluka) · Guntur · Andhra Pradesh

Y BENNAYYA NAIDU, Prl. Senior Civil Judge, is posted at XI Addl. District Court (FTC), Tenali (Taluka), Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India. 115 court orders on record since 2023. 4 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OP, EP, OS cases.

115

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

OP/169/2023

Chilaka Ashok Kumar vs Vsxxx

05 Sep 2023

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, TENALI

Present : Sri Y.Bennayya Naidu

Principal Senior Civil Judge

Tuesday the 05th day of September 2023

H.M.O.P.No.169/2023

Between :

1. Chilaka Ashok Kumar, S/o. Nageswara Rao, aged about 27 years, Hindu, Private Employee, R/o. D. No.12-18-131, Maseed Street, Repalle town and mandal.

2. Chilaka @ Yadlapalli Vaishnavi Devi, W/o. Ashok Kumar, D/o. Late Srinivasa Rao, aged about 23 years, Hindu, House-wife, R/o. D. No.2-25-A, Thumuluru village,

Kollipara mandal, Guntur district. ..Petitioners.

And

NIL ..Respondent.

This petition came on 04.09.2023 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri J. Siva Rama Kumar and Sri K. Satish Kumar, Advocates for the petitioners and there are no respondents herein, and upon hearing and perusing the material available on record and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following :

O R D E R

This is a petition filed U/sec.13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, by petitioners 1 and 2 who are legally wedded couple, seeking for divorce by mutual consent.

2. The case of the petitioners in brief is that :

a). The petitioners 1 and 2 are husband and wife respectively, who are

Hindus by religion, and that their love marriage was solemnised on 29.05.2020 at

Gopayya Swamy Temple, Chilumuru village, Kolluru mandal, Guntur district, as per Hindu rites and their community customs, in the presence of elders, friends and relatives of both the petitioners. Immediately after the marriage, the 2nd petitioner (wife) joined the 1st petitioner (husband) at his house at Repalle village,

Guntur mandal, and both the petitioners lead their happy marital life only for a 2 period of 4 months. Subsequently, in the first week of September, 2020, serious differences arose between the petitioners 1 and 2 in leading their respective lifestyles, their customs and their earnings, and they could not live together as husband and wife. The marital relations between the petitioners 1 and 2 were irretrievably broken down. There is no possibility for reunion of petitioners even in future. As a result, since 7th September, 2020, the petitioners 1 and 2 have been residing sepately, and the 1st petitioner is residing at Repalle town and the 2nd petitioner is residing at Thumuluru village, Kollipara mandal. All the mediations made through mediators for reunion of the petitioners 1 and 2, were proved futile. The petitioenrs 1 and 2 were not blessed with any children.

b). It is further submitted in the petition that after careful and thorough discussions, the petitioenrs 1 and 2 decided that their marriage should be dissolved through court of law on their mutual consent, so as to enable them to lead their respective future life happily in a better way. As such, the 1st petitioner agreed to pay an amount of Rs.35,000/- to the 2nd petitioner towards full and final settlement of the 2nd petitioner’s permanent alimony and maintenance and the 2nd petitioner also agreed to receive the said amount towards full and final settlement of her past, present and future alimony/maintenance. Petitioners 1 and 2 further submitted that there is no collusion between them in filing this petition and no similar petition is filed or pending before any other courts. Hence this petition.

3. In support of the case, P.Ws.1 and 2 are examined and Exs.P1 to P4 documents were marked.

4.Heard both sides and posted for orders.

5. The point for consideration is;

Whether the petitioners are entitled for mutual divorce as

prayed for?

6.On perusal of record, both the petitioners are legally wedded couple whose marriage took place on 29.05.2020 at Gopayya Swamy Temple, Chilumuru village, Kolluru mandal, as per Hindu marriage customs and traditions. On coming to the fact of the marriage, the petitioners filed the documents i.e., Three marriage photos along with CD relates to petitioners, copies of Aadhar Cards of petitioners 1 and 2 and identification certificates issued by Gazetted officer in the name of petitioners and they are marked as Exs.P1 to P4. It is further case that they have been living separately since more than two and half years.

7.As seen from the evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2, they have been living separately since more than two and half years and they also deposed that there is no possibility of any reconciliation or re-union between them and they have decided to take divorce from Court of law. Both the petitioners have agreed not to take any civil or criminal action or maintenance cases, or property cases etc., against each other and those cases if any foisted are not binding on the other.

Therefore, the above arrangement between both the petitioners shows that there is no collusion in between them and there is no chance of re-union in between them.

8.As seen from the evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2, they have been living separately since more than two and half years.They also deposed that there is no possibility of any reconciliation or re-union between them and they have decided to take divorce from Court of law.

9.As seen from the evidence of P.W.1 and 2 and as seen the contents of petition filed by the petitioners, I found that the petitioners 1 and 2 have been living and residing separately since more than than two and half years without showing any interest and efforts to lead matrimonial life and also the petitioners are not showing any interest for reunion for the purpose of leading conjugal life 4 inspite of having knowledge about advices of elders and then also they have reiterated before the elders to live separately. Further, I found that they have clearly deposed that there is no possibility of any reconciliation or reunion between the petitioners and also they have already decided to take divorce from the court of law.

10.In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, I hold that the observation of statutory period of 6 months as cooling off period is not necessary on ground that the petitioners have been living separately since more than one year.So, I found that the waiving of cooling off period i.e., statutory period is very essential in this matter by reason that there is no possibility for reconciliation or any reunion between the petitioners. Further, I found that it is very fit case to waive the cooling off period of 6 months in view of above circumstances. So, the cooling off period of 6 months is hereby waived and permitted the petitioners to get divorce from the court of law.

11.Therefore, under the above facts and circumstances, this Court feels that if no divorce is granted no useful purpose would be served since they have been living separately since more than two and half years.Hence, the point is answered accordingly by holding that the petitioners are entitled for divorce on mutual consent.

12.In the result, the petition is allowed by granting decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage between the petitioners 1 and 2 that took place on 29.05.2020 on the ground of mutual consent. Under the above facts and circumstances no costs are awarded.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer Grade-I, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court, this the 05th September, 2023.

Sd/-xx,

Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Tenali.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Petitioners :

P.W.1 : Ch. Ashok Kumar. P.W.2 : Ch. @ Y. Vaishnavi Devi

For Respondent:

- None-

Documents Marked

For Petitioners :

Ex.P1 : Three marriage Photos along with CD relates topetitioners. Ex.P2 : Copy of Aadhar card of 1st petitioner. Ex.P3 : Copy of Aadhar card of 2nd petitioner. Ex.P5 : Identification Certificates issued by Gazetted officer in the name of petitioners.

For Respondent :

-- Nil --

Sd/-xx,

Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Tenali.

OP/201/2022

Thanneeru Ankamma Rao vs Thanneeru Lakshmi @ Sri lakshmi

11 Sep 2023

N THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE: TENALI

PRESENT:Sri Y. Bennayya Naidu

Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tenali

Monday, this the 11th day of September, 2023

HMOP No.201 of 2022

Between:

Thanneeru Ankamma Rao, S/o. Rama Rao, aged about 25 years,

Hindu, Mason, R/o. D.No.2-35-12/1, Paruchurivari Veedhi,

Gandhi Nagar, Tenali, Guntur District. ...Petitioner

And

Thanneeru Lakshmi @ Sri Lakshmi, W/o. Ankamma Rao, D/o. Pallapu Mangaiah, aged about 21 years, Hindu, Housewife, R/o. D.No.9-4-13, beside TDP Office, Patha Bus

Stand Center, Sattenapalli Town, Guntur District. ..Respondent.

This petition coming on 11.09.2023 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri Nannapaneni Madhava Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner and the

Respondent was set exparte, and having stood over for consideration to this day, this Court made the following:

EX-PARTE ORDER

This petition is filed by the petitioner/Husband under Section 13 (1) (ia)(ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking the Court to grant decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage of the petitioner which took place with the respondent/wife and costs of the petition.

The averments of the petition in brief are as follows:

02.The petitioner submitted that petitioner is the legally wedded husband of the respondent and their marriage took place on 08.04.2010 at the residence of the petitioner, Tenali, Guntur District as per the rites and customs prevailing in

Hindu Community. At the time of marriage, there were no formalities like dowry, lanchanams etc. Immediately after the marriage, the respondent joined with the family of the petitioner at Tenali and the marriage was consummated. Out of their wedlock, they were blessed with a male child. They lived happily for a few months. From the beginning of their marriage, the respondent did not show any interest about the marital life and used to behave like an unknown person in the 2 house of the petitioner. She always used to go to her parental house at

Sattenaplli and stay there for about 3/4 days in every month. The respondent grew angry against the petitioner and used to scold him in a filthy language and used to threaten the petitioner that she will file criminal cases against him and his family members and send them to jail if they involve in her personal affairs.

Some times, she used to make fake attempts of committing suicide by pouring kerosene on her body. The respondent did not prepare food for the petitioner and demanded him to bring tiffin and meals from hotels. On 15.09.2011, the respondent raised dispute with the petitioner without any reason and poured kerosene on her body and trying to lit herself with match box and the mother of the petitioner rushed to her and picked out the match box from the respondent and stopped her attempt and filed a complaint against the respondent before

Sub Inspector of Police, II Town Police Station, Tenali for threatening and committing suicide in their house and also informed the same to the father of the respondent. The father of the respondent rushed to Tenali and took away the respondent to his house at Sattenapalliand the respondent did not return to the house of the petitioner till now.

In spite of all the cruelty and desertion made by the respondent, the petitioner tried his best to take the respondent in to his folds for the sake of the male child. The elders on behalf of the petitioner went to the respondent and requested her to come and join with the petitioner, but the respondent did not respond with an ulterior motive and threatening the petitioner that she will commit suicide in the house of the petitioner and foist false case against the petitioner and his family members and take revenge by sending them to jail in dowry death case. Hence, the respondent failed to act as a dutiful wife. In the said circumstances, there is no hope of reunion of the petitioner and the respondent.

It is further submitted that the petitioner filed a petition in HMOP

No.203/2017 on the file of the Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Tenali and during the course of inquiry, the respondent presented before the court and proposed for restitution of conjugal rights. On believing of her words, the respondent filed a joint memo before this court in Lok Adalat on 20.04.2019 for settlement in which the respondent agreed to come and join with the petitioner for leading marital life.

The court settled the matter in Lok Adalat and passed award. But in spite of 3 repeated requests made by the petitioner and on his behalf, the respondent did not come forward to join with the petitioner and to lead marital life. Hence, the petitioner is filing this petition for the dissolution of his marriage with the respondent held on 08.04.2010 by a decree of divorce.

03.The petitioner further submitted that there is no collusion between the petitioner and the respondent in filing this petition and no such petition is filed by either party under the Hindu Marriage Act before any other court. Hence this petition.

04.In spite of receiving the notice, the respondent did not attend the court.

Hence she was set exparte.

05.Now the point for consideration is –

Whether the petitioner is entitled to seek decree of divorce for dissolution of his marriage with the respondent?

06.Heard. Perused chief examination affidavit of PW.1 and the contents of petition and recitals of documentary evidence of petitioner i.e., Exs.P1 to

P3, I found that the PW.1/petitioner has successfully established his case and allegations against respondent by virtue of his cogent evidence and by virtue of documentary evidence and by virtue of contents of the petition.

07.As seen from the evidence of PW.1 and contents of the petition, and as seen from the documentary evidence of the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the petitioner is absolutely entitled to seek relief of decree of divorce against the respondent by reason that the petitioner has clearly established his case against the respondent. Therefore, I found that it is a fit case for granting decree of divorce in between petitioner and respondent in view of aforesaid facts.

08.Hence, in the result, the petition is allowed in favour of the petitioner and against therespondent without costs under the circumstances of the 4 case. Further, the decree of divorce is hereby granted in favour of the petitioner against the respondent by dissolving the marriage dated 08.04.2010 in between the petitioner and the respondent from the date of this order.

Typed to my dictation by Typist corrected and pronounced by me in open

Court, this the 11th day of September, 2023.

Sd/- XXX

Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Tenali.

Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses Examined

For Petitioner: For Respondent:

PW1 : T. Ankama Rao - None -

Exhibits Marked

For Petitioner:

Ex.P1 : Certified copy of the award, dt.20.04.2019 passed in

L.A. No.155/2019 of MLSC, Tenali in H.M.O.P.203/2017 on the file of the Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Tenali.

Ex.P2: Copy of Aadhar Card of petitioner.

Ex.P3: Identification certificate issued by Gazetted officer, in the name of the petitioner.

For Respondent:

- Nil - Sd/- XXX

Prl. Senior Civil Judge,

Tenali.

OP/127/2023

Vemupalli @ Kakumanu Swathi Lakshmi vs Kakumanu Praveen Kumar

04 Sep 2023

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE: TENALI

PRESENT:Sri Y. Bennayya Naidu

Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tenali

Monday, this the 4th day of September, 2023

HMOP No.127 of 2023

Between:

Vemulapalli @ Kakumanu Swathi Lakshmi,

W/o. Kakumanu Praveen Kumar, D/o. Sankara Rao,

Hindu, aged about 37 years, Employee, R/o. D.No.2-11-44,

Vadlamudi Kotaiah’s Street, Nandulapet, Tenali Mandal,

Guntur District. ...Petitioner.

And

Kakumanu Praveen Kumar, S/o. (Late) Kakumanu Babu Rao,

Hindu, aged about 48 years, Pvt. Employee, D.No.4-25-1,

Opposite Bhaskar Enclave, Near SBI Bank, Ithanagar,

Tenali, Guntur District. ...Respondent.

This petition coming on 04.09.2023 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri Ponnam Vijay Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioner and the

Respondent was set exparte, and having stood over for consideration to this day, this Court made the following:

EX-PARTE ORDER

This petition is filed by the petitioner/wife under Section 13 (1) (ia)(ib) of

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking the Court to grant decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage of the petitioner which took place with the respondent/Husband and costs of the petition.

The averments of the petition in brief are as follows:

2.The petitioner submitted that she is the legally wedded wife of the

Respondent and their marriage took place at the Young Men’s Association Hall,

Eluru Road, Vijayawada on 28.11.2014 as per Hindu rites and caste customs

before the elders of the both sides. On the demand of the respondent, the

parents of the petitioner gave an amount of Rs.3,00,000/-, 15 sovereigns of gold towards the marriage expenses and 3 sovereigns of gold ornaments to him. The father of the Petitioner spent an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- towards the marriage 2 expenses. Immediately after the marriage the petitioner joined with the respondent at matrimonial home, Tenali to lead happy marital life along with the sare worth about Rs.1,50,000/- i.e., the house hold articles, utensils and furniture etc., the said marriage was consummated between the parties and a male child was born during their wedlock.

The petitioner further submits that the respondent used to work as a private employee as a collection agent at Ashok Layland. From the beginning of the marital life, the respondent did not look after the welfare of the petitioner for the daily needs. Thereby, the petitioner had to work as a private school teacher and supported the family members and beat the petitioner without any reasonable cause. The respondent did not take care of the petitioner and support in the nourishment of their only son and neglected his duties as a manager of the family and ill-treated the petitioner like a servant.

The petitioner further submits that the respondent used to behave high handedly and loose his temperament against the employers and lost his job many times. The respondent parents sold away 5 acres of agricultural land, 1,000 sq,yards of vacant site and residential house at Ithanagar, Tenali for the repayment of his debts. The respondent grabbed 12 sovereigns of gold from the

Petitioner and sold away for his bad vices. Thereby, that on 09.08.2019 the respondent beat the petitioner inhumanly and necked out along with the child on demand of the amount for settlement of his debts. Having no other go, the petitioner reached to her parent’s home along with her son. Later, the elders of the Petitioner Movva Sasikala and Movva Siva Prasad tried to convince the respondent for amicable settlement, but in return the respondent threatened the petitioner with dire consequences. Thereby, all the attempts of the petitioner to pacify the issue proved futile. Since then, the respondent did not cohabit and neglected the marital relations by deserting the petitioner.

3. The petitioner further submits that finally decided that the respondent would never change his cruel behaviour and therefore the petitioner completely lost her hope on the marital life with the respondent due to the mental and physical harassment meted out by her in the hands of the respondent. Hence, this petition.

The petitioner further submitted that there is no collusion between the petitioner and the respondent in filing this petition and no such petition is filed by either party under the Hindu Marriage Act before any other court. Hence this petition.

4.In spite of receiving the notice, the respondent did not attend the court.

Hence he was set exparte.

5.Now the point for consideration is –

Whether the petitioner is entitled to seek decree of divorce for dissolution of her marriage with the respondent?

6.Heard. Perused chief examination affidavit of PW.1 and the contents of petition and also recitals of documentary evidence of petitioner i.e.,

Exs.P1 to P4, I found that the PW.1/petitioner has successfully established her case and allegations against respondent by virtue of her cogent evidence and by virtue of documentary evidence and by virtue of contents of the petition.

7.As seen from the evidence of PW.1 and contents of the petition, and as seen the documentary evidence of the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the petitioner is absolutely entitled to seek relief of decree of divorce against the respondent by reason that the petitioner has clearly established her case against the respondent. Therefore, I hold that it is a fit case for grant decree of divorce in between petitioner and respondent in view of aforesaid facts.

8.Hence, in the result, the petition is allowed in favour of the petitioner and against therespondent without costs under the circumstances of the case. Further, the decree of divorce is hereby granted in favour of the petitioner against the respondent by dissolving the marriage dated 28.11.2004 in between the petitioner and the respondent from the date of this order.

Typed to my dictation by Typist corrected and pronounced by me in open Court, this the 04th day of September, 2023.

Sd/- XXX

Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Tenali.

Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses Examined

For Petitioner: For Respondent:

PW1 : Vemulapalli @ K. Swathi Lakshmi - None -

Exhibits Marked

For Petitioner:

Ex.P1 : Wedding Card, dated 28.11.2004 relates to petitioner and respondent.

Ex.P2 : Two marriage photos along with CD (marked as bunch) relates to the petitioner and the respondent.

Ex.P3 : Copy of Aadhar Card of the petitioner.

Ex.P4: Identification certificate issued by Gazetted officer, in the name of the petitioner.

For Respondent:

- Nil -

Sd/- XXX

Prl. Senior Civil Judge,

Tenali.

OP/135/2023

Munnagi Suresh vs Munnagi @ Chekuri Usha Rani

11 Sep 2023

Order Record 114 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OP/135/2023	Munnagi Suresh vs Munnagi @ Chekuri Usha Rani	11 Sep 2023	OTHER	—
OP/201/2022	Thanneeru Ankamma Rao vs Thanneeru Lakshmi @ Sri lakshmi	11 Sep 2023	ORDER	—
OS/53/2023	Vuyyuru Sri Lakshmi vs Emani Rajya Lakshmi and two others	09 Sep 2023	JUDGEMENT	—
OP/169/2023	Chilaka Ashok Kumar vs Vsxxx	05 Sep 2023	ORDER	—
OP/127/2023	Vemupalli @ Kakumanu Swathi Lakshmi vs Kakumanu Praveen Kumar	04 Sep 2023	ORDER	—
OP/129/2023	Teki Lakshmi Priya vs Teki Raja Sekhar	04 Sep 2023	ORDER	—
OP/135/2022	The petitioner poluri Priyanka vs Poluri Rajasekhar reddy	04 Sep 2023	ORDER	—
OP/137/2023	Angirekala Koteswari vs Angirekula Naga Baji	04 Sep 2023	ORDER	—
OP/141/2023	Gandikota Adilakshmi vs Gandikota Srinivasa Rao	04 Sep 2023	ORDER	—
OP/143/2022	Tirukolluru Naga Malleswari alias Tinnaluri naga malleswari vs Tinnaluri Rangaiah	04 Sep 2023	ORDER	—
OP/147/2023	Movva @ Batta Vennela Sai Manasa vs Battta Balaji Manikantha Kumar	04 Sep 2023	ORDER	—
OP/211/2022	Kosuru Ramesh vs Kosuru Bhulakshmi	04 Sep 2023	ORDER	—
OP/213/2022	Kusam Siva Suresh reddy vs Kusam Lakshmi Pragna @ Pragna	04 Sep 2023	ORDER	—
OP/31/2022	Chintalapati Venkata Sita Rama Lakshmi Narasimha Siva Naga Satya Prasad vs Chintalapati @ Panthangi Triveni	26 Aug 2023	OTHER	—
OP/163/2023	Godavarthi Ramkishore vs Vsxxx	18 Aug 2023	ORDER	—
OP/87/2022	Madhavarapu Vamsi vs Madhavarapu Priya	14 Aug 2023	OTHER	—
OP/119/2023	Kagga Venkata Krishna Priyanka @ Priyanka vs Kagga Siva Sankar	11 Aug 2023	ORDER	—
OP/205/2022	Tadiparthi Venkata Sai kumar vs Tadiparthi Sujana	11 Aug 2023	ORDER	—
OP/287/2022	Veesam Anjaneyulu vs Veesam @ Atthuluri Sravani	11 Aug 2023	OTHER	—
EP/175/2015	AVUTHU CHANDRA SEKHARA REDDY vs KOLLI VENKATESWARA REDDY	10 Aug 2023	ORDER	—
OP/157/2023	Tejavathu Ganesh Kumar vs Vsxxx	10 Aug 2023	ORDER	—
OP/149/2023	Gunji Pamulu Varma vs Vsxxx	09 Aug 2023	ORDER	—
OP/155/2023	Kolluru Bhaskara Rao vs Vsxxx	09 Aug 2023	ORDER	—
EP/31/2018	Mandava Dhanunjaya Rao@ Dhanunjayarao vs Baina Sambasiva Rao	08 Aug 2023	OTHER	—
EP/37/2019	Kaluva Venkateswara Rao vs Koppanati Nagavara Prasada Rao	08 Aug 2023	OTHER	—
OP/145/2023	Pasupuleti Jagadeesh vs Vsxxx	08 Aug 2023	ORDER	—
OP/151/2023	Yalavarthi Srinivas vs Vsxxx	08 Aug 2023	ORDER	—
OP/57/2023	Alla Revanth Kumar vs Alla @ Ravula Sai Prasanna	07 Aug 2023	OTHER	—
OP/153/2023	Ravuri Siri Manikanta vs Vsxxx	07 Aug 2023	OTHER	—
OP/273/2022	Talakondapati Venkat Subba Rao vs Talakondapati Naga Rama Devi	07 Aug 2023	ORDER	—
OP/189/2022	Komakula Ammaji vs Komakula Venkata Ramana	04 Aug 2023	ORDER	—
SC/56/2023	Sub Inspector of Police, Tenali III Town P.S. vs Sarikonda Suram Raju @ Suresh	04 Aug 2023	JUDGEMENT	—
SC/568/2022	The state SHo I town PS, Tenali vs Kaveti Prabhudeva alias deva	04 Aug 2023	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/59/2021	Kanneganti Satyanarayana vs Mandalapu Subbarao @ Subbarao swamy	03 Aug 2023	ORDER	—
SC/343/2020	SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TSUNDUR P.S vs GADELAVARTHI DASU	03 Aug 2023	JUDGEMENT	—
OP/59/2023	Peddi @ Alapati Ratna Kumari vs Peddi Hyma Rao	31 Jul 2023	OTHER	—
OP/55/2021	SANAKA NAGA SURESH vs SANAKA @ PURAMSETTY SWATHI	28 Jul 2023	OTHER	—
OP/63/2020	BELLAMKONDA SIVA NAGARAJU vs BELLLAMKONDA NAGALAKSHMI	28 Jul 2023	OTHER	—
OP/115/2023	Kotapati Siva Sankar vs Kotapati Divya	28 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
OP/247/2021	Kola Chinmaya Lakshmi vs Kola Ramalingeswara Rao	28 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
EP/1/2023	Gampala Naga Raju vs Shaik Nazeerunissa	21 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
OP/75/2023	Kommuri Venkata Kanaka Lingeswara Rao vs Kommuru Lakshmi Harika	21 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
OP/271/2022	Murala Ravi Kumar vs Murala Rama Devi	21 Jul 2023	OTHER	—
OP/193/2022	Tota @ Thota Rajesh vs Thota Kaleswaramma alias Koteswaramma	18 Jul 2023	OTHER	—
EP/7/2023	M/s. Margadarsi Chit Fund Pvt.Ltd vs Painam Suresh Babu	17 Jul 2023	OTHER	—
EP/47/2021	Kurra Sivannarayana vs Kocharla Subrahmanyam	17 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
OP/29/2023	Inkollu @ Mosali Aparna vs Mosali Naga Murali	17 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
OP/269/2022	Yemineni Narayana Murthy vs Yemineni Deepthi	17 Jul 2023	OTHER	—
EP/25/2017	MUNNANGI VEERA REDDY vs KONDAMADUGULA VENKATA REDDY	14 Jul 2023	OTHER	—
OP/31/2023	Jonnadula Mani Subramanyam vs Jonnadula @ Valakeerthi Harika	14 Jul 2023	OTHER	—
OP/161/2021	Parachuru Rajyalakshmi vs Parachuru Venkata Rajesh Kumar	14 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
OP/11/2023	Mulpuru Gopi vs NIL	13 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
OP/97/2023	Ramavath Shankar Nayak vs Vsxxx	13 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
OS/383/2014	BHEEMAVARAPU BASIVI REDDY vs YEMINENI NANCHARAIAH AND ANOTHER	13 Jul 2023	OTHER	—
OP/109/2023	Annapareddy Srinivas vs Nil	12 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
OP/113/2023	Perla Srikanth vs Vsxxx	12 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
OS/207/2018	Shaik Abdul Salam vs Shaik Mohammad Ali	12 Jul 2023	JUDGEMENT	—
OP/89/2023	Kantheti Vishnu Vardhan Rao vs Vsxxx	11 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
OP/111/2023	KORIVI ASHOK AND ANOTHER vs NIL	11 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
OS/1/2018	CHAGANTI SIVAMMA vs VUYYURU VIJAYALAKSHMI	11 Jul 2023	OTHER	—
OP/93/2023	Anchala Venkateswara Rao vs Anchala Vara Lakshmi	10 Jul 2023	JUDGEMENT	—
OP/95/2023	Nethikunta Akshay vs Vsxxx	10 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
OS/1/2022	Yadlapati Vijaya Ranganadh vs Kota Venkateswara Rao	10 Jul 2023	JUDGEMENT	—
OP/139/2019	GUNJA SAMBA vs BRANCH MANAGER L.I.C OF INDIA, TENALI.	07 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
OP/147/2022	Muthyala Rajyalakshmi vs Muthyala durga rao	07 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
OP/83/2023	Kandula Durga Prasad vs Vsxxx	06 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
OS/73/2017	TUMMALA LAKSHMI SUJATHA vs KUPPA CHANDRA SEKHAR	06 Jul 2023	OTHER	—
EP/60/2019	BETHALA ASHOK BABU vs BETHALA MURTHY	05 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
OP/23/2023	Katthika @ Lokam Siva Swapna vs Katthika Phani Teja	05 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
EP/23/2018	PATAN AKBHAR KHAN vs MOKKAPATI CHOWDARAIAH ALIAS CHOWDARY	04 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
OP/91/2023	Bodduluri Divyasree @ Kancharla Divyasree vs Vsxxx	04 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
OP/99/2023	Sunkara Mani Chaitanya vs Sunkara Aakhya	04 Jul 2023	DECREE	—
EP/100013/2007	KURSID BEGAM@ KULUSUM BEEBI vs THYMA THUNNISA BEGAM	03 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
OP/63/2022	Pangaluri Priyanka vs Pangaluri Mallikarjuan Rao	03 Jul 2023	JUDGEMENT	—
OP/233/2021	Devarakonda Rambabu vs Devarakonda Sravani	03 Jul 2023	OTHER	—
OP/265/2022	Matti jaya Krishna vs NIL	03 Jul 2023	ORDER	—
EP/22/2020	PRASADAM SRINIVASA RAO vs PASUPULETI RAMA	30 Jun 2023	ORDER	—
EP/53/2018	Marouthu Jhansi Lakshmi vs Nannapaneni Bujji	30 Jun 2023	ORDER	—
OP/67/2023	Golla Tirumala Ganga @ Gogam Tirumala Ganga vs Golla Ankamma Rao	30 Jun 2023	ORDER	—
OP/149/2022	Badugu Rama Rao vs Badugu Vijaya lakshmi	27 Jun 2023	OTHER	—
OP/45/2022	Kasukurthi Rakesh Sarma vs Kasukurthi @ Gundimeda Sarada Nirmala	26 Jun 2023	OTHER	—
OP/61/2023	Jonnadula Ramakrishna vs Jonnadula @ Punna Udaya Sri	26 Jun 2023	ORDER	—
OP/73/2022	Karumuri Malleswari vs Karumuri Pedda Veeraiah	26 Jun 2023	OTHER	—
OS/191/2016	VELIVOLU SRIMANNAYANA vs MALLAVARAPU SIVA KUMARI	26 Jun 2023	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/203/2016	KATRAGADDA VENKATESWARA RAO vs PAVULURU RAMBABU	26 Jun 2023	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/41/2016	K.Koteswara Lingam vs Alla Samba Siva Rao	23 Jun 2023	ORDER	—
EP/166/1989	Agnihotram Seetharamacharyulu(Died) vs Land Aquisition Officer, Sub- Collector, Tenali	23 Jun 2023	ORDER	—
OP/137/2022	Peram yogitha alias salapuyogitha vs Salapu ramesh babu	23 Jun 2023	ORDER	—
OS/99/2018	Gorrepati Satyanarayana reddy vs Nimmala Venkateswara reddy	23 Jun 2023	OTHER	—
OS/195/2013	Kolli Vijaya Lakshmi vs Kusam Parvathi and 2 others	23 Jun 2023	JUDGEMENT	—
OP/79/2023	Mylavarapu Srinivasa Reddy vs Vsxxx	22 Jun 2023	ORDER	—
OP/237/2022	Kothamasu Satish Kumar vs Kothamasu Jayalakshmi	22 Jun 2023	OTHER	—
H.M.O.P/165/2017	GADDIPATI BRAHMAIAH CHOWDARY vs GADDIPATI SUDHARANI	22 Jun 2023	ORDER	—
OP/133/2021	YALAVARTHI BHAVYA vs YALAVARTHI RAJESH	21 Jun 2023	ORDER	—
OP/155/2021	Bitra Ramu vs Bitra Veeramma	21 Jun 2023	ORDER	—
OP/267/2022	Kasu Lakshmi Tirupatamma vs Kasu Ramireddy	21 Jun 2023	ORDER	—
OS/21/2022	Vuyyuru Chandra Sekhara Rao vs Ramisetti Krishna	20 Jun 2023	OTHER	—
EP/58/2018	Danaboina Sambrajyam vs Veesam Venkata Sambasiva Rao	16 Jun 2023	ORDER	—
SC/1122/2022	SHO ,Tenali I Town P.S. vs Kukutlapalli Venkate Manikanta @ Ramanaiah	25 May 2023	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/31/2020	CHANDU CHITTEMMA vs JYOTHULA VEERA NAGESWARA RAO	13 May 2023	ORDER	—

Showing 100 of 114 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Sep 2023		13
Aug 2023		22
Jul 2023		42
Jun 2023		22
May 2023		16

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Y BENNAYYA NAIDU handled?

Y BENNAYYA NAIDU has handled 115 court orders since 2023 at XI Addl. District Court (FTC), Tenali (Taluka). The average disposal rate is 24 orders per month.

What types of cases does Y BENNAYYA NAIDU hear?

Based on available records, Y BENNAYYA NAIDU primarily handles Civil matters (Original Petitions, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Sessions Cases) at XI Addl. District Court (FTC), Tenali (Taluka).

Where is Y BENNAYYA NAIDU currently posted?

Y BENNAYYA NAIDU is posted as Prl. Senior Civil Judge at XI Addl. District Court (FTC), Tenali (Taluka), Guntur, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Y BENNAYYA NAIDU available online?

Yes. 4 judgments by Y BENNAYYA NAIDU are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Y BENNAYYA NAIDU dispose cases?

Y BENNAYYA NAIDU disposes approximately 24 cases per month, based on 115 orders handled over their tenure at XI Addl. District Court (FTC), Tenali (Taluka).

Since when is Y BENNAYYA NAIDU serving?

Y BENNAYYA NAIDU has been serving at XI Addl. District Court (FTC), Tenali (Taluka) since 2023.

Case Types

OP 64%

EP 18%

OS 13%

SC 3%

H 1%

Posting History

May 2023 — Sep 2023

Prl. Senior Civil Judge · 115 orders

Other Judges at this Court

D Srinivasulu

XI Addl. District Sessions Judge

1,043 orders

Smt. M. Indira Priayadarsini

POCSO COURT, TENALI

293 orders

S.Venkateswara Reddy

Prl. Senior Civil Judge

0 orders

Shaik Abdul Shariff B.com, B.l.

Addl. Senior Civil Judge

314 orders

Pavan Kumar Aka

Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Tenali

1,453 orders

P. Vivek Vardhan

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Tenali

61 orders

Ch Pavan Kumar

II Addl. Junior Civil Judge.

0 orders

← View all judges at XI Addl. District Court (FTC), Tenali (Taluka)

Y Bennayya Naidu

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, TENALI

O R D E R

Whether the petitioners are entitled for mutual divorce as

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

EX-PARTE ORDER

Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses Examined

Exhibits Marked

Prl. Senior Civil Judge,

Tenali.

EX-PARTE ORDER

Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses Examined

Exhibits Marked

Prl. Senior Civil Judge,

Tenali.

O R D E R

Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses Examined

No oral or documentary evidence is marked.

Prl. Senior Civil Judge,

Tenali.