Q.35
Evidence Act & Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Medium Knowledge-Based

“The DNA test cannot rebut the conclusive presumption envisaged under section 12 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The parties can avoid the rigor of such conclusive presumption only by proving non-access which is a negative proof.” It was so held in which case-

Shaik Fakruddin u. Shaik Mohammed Hasan, AIR 2006 AP 48 Answer
B Siddaramesh v. State of Karnataka, (2010) 3 SCC 152
C Kailash v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 2007 SC 107
D Samwanti u. State of Punjab, AIR 1963 SC 151
📋

Explanation & Strategy

Click any section to expand · only one open at a time

Under the Income Tax Act, 'previous year' is the year income is earned; 'assessment year' is the following year when it's taxed. Residential status (R/NR/RNOR) determines scope of taxable income.

At a Glance
Subject Evidence Act & Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam
Difficulty Medium
Answer (A) Knowledge-Based
Paper AIBE VI — January 2014
Progress in Paper
Q.35 100 questions

35% through paper