Share Q.98:
Q.98
Evidence Act & Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Medium Knowledge-Based
Bare Act Indian Evidence Act, 1872 · Section 24-30

Pakala Narayan Swami v. Emperor is a leading case on:

A Dying Declaration
B Admission
Confession Answer
D None of the above
📋

Explanation & Strategy

Click any section to expand · only one open at a time

Pakala Narayan Swami v. Emperor is a leading case on confessions. The Privy Council defined confession as a statement that either admits guilt in terms or admits substantially all the facts which constitute the offence charged. A mixed statement partly inculpatory and partly exculpatory is NOT a confession.

At a Glance
Subject Evidence Act & Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam
Difficulty Medium
Act Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section Section 24-30
Answer (C) Knowledge-Based
Paper AIBE X — March 2017
Progress in Paper
Q.98 100 questions

98% through paper

📖 Open Book — Reading Mode Indian Evidence Act, 1872 ↗ New Tab
📄

Mobile browsers only show page 1 of a PDF in-panel.
Open in a new tab to read all pages.

Open Indian Evidence Act, 1872 →
📚 Carry these bare acts to the exam: Set 1 on Amazon ↗  ·  Set 2 on Amazon ↗
You're on Legistro
AIBE Prep is just one part of Legistro
India's advocate directory, court records, and legal tools — all free
⚖️
Advocate Directory
Find verified advocates by city, court & practice area
🏛️
Judge & Court Records
5,848 judge profiles with order history & disposal rates
🧮
Court Fee Calculator
State-wise court fees for 25+ states — gazette verified
📋
Join as Advocate — Free
Case diary, cause list, client management & verified profile
Explore Legistro →