AIBE XI — December 2017 — Q.47 (Constitution of India)

Share Q.47:

Q.47

Constitutional Law Medium Knowledge-Based

Bare Act Constitution of India · Maneka Gandhi v. UOI (1978)

In Maneka Gandhi case it was observed that:

A but the confiscation of Passport is not in accordance to the law (d) None of the above

B Right to go abroad is not within the meaning of Article 21

✓ Right to go abroad is within the ambit of Article 19(1)(A) but the confiscation of Passport is not in accordance to the law Answer

D None of the above

📋

Explanation & Strategy

Click any section to expand · only one open at a time

In Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978), the SC observed that the procedure established by law (Article 21) must be fair, just, and reasonable — not arbitrary or oppressive. This expanded Article 21 beyond the narrow A.K. Gopalan interpretation.

At a Glance

Subject Constitutional Law

Difficulty Medium

Act Constitution of India

Section Maneka Gandhi v. UOI (1978)

Answer (C) Knowledge-Based

Paper AIBE XI — December 2017

Navigation

← Q.46 ☰ All Questions Q.48 →

🎯 Mock Test

Progress in Paper

Q.47 100 questions

47% through paper

📖 Open Book — Reading Mode Constitution of India ↗ New Tab

📄

Mobile browsers only show page 1 of a PDF in-panel.
Open in a new tab to read all pages.

Open Constitution of India →