Share Q.52:
Q.52
Constitutional Law Medium Knowledge-Based
Bare Act Constitution of India · Olga Tellis v. BMC (1985)

Due to the outcome of this case slum dwellers were benefitted:

A N.K. Chanda v. State of Haryana
Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation Answer
C P. V . Narasimharao v. Union of India
D Railam Municipal Council v. Vardichand
📋

Explanation & Strategy

Click any section to expand · only one open at a time

Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985) benefitted slum dwellers. The SC held that right to livelihood is part of right to life under Article 21, and slum dwellers cannot be evicted without giving them alternative accommodation or rehabilitation.

At a Glance
Subject Constitutional Law
Difficulty Medium
Act Constitution of India
Section Olga Tellis v. BMC (1985)
Answer (B) Knowledge-Based
Paper AIBE XI — December 2017
Progress in Paper
Q.52 100 questions

52% through paper

📖 Open Book — Reading Mode Constitution of India ↗ New Tab
📄

Mobile browsers only show page 1 of a PDF in-panel.
Open in a new tab to read all pages.

Open Constitution of India →
📚 Carry these bare acts to the exam: Set 1 on Amazon ↗  ·  Set 2 on Amazon ↗
You're on Legistro
AIBE Prep is just one part of Legistro
India's advocate directory, court records, and legal tools — all free
⚖️
Advocate Directory
Find verified advocates by city, court & practice area
🏛️
Judge & Court Records
5,848 judge profiles with order history & disposal rates
🧮
Court Fee Calculator
State-wise court fees for 25+ states — gazette verified
📋
Join as Advocate — Free
Case diary, cause list, client management & verified profile
Explore Legistro →