AIBE Prep › Papers › AIBE XIII — December 2018 › Q.73
← 72 ☰ Paper 74 →
73/100
Q.73
Contract, Specific Relief, Property & NI Act Medium Knowledge-Based
Bare Act Transfer of Property Act, 1882 · Section 52 / Jayaram Mudaliar

The doctrine of ‘Lis pendens’ was explained in the leading case of:

✓ Bellamy v. Sabine Answer
B Cooper v. Cooper
C Streatifised v. Streafield
D Tulk v. Moxbay
📋

Explanation & Strategy

Click any section to expand · only one open at a time

The doctrine of Lis Pendens (S.52 TPA — 'pending suit') was explained in Jayaram Mudaliar v. Ayyaswami. It provides that during pendency of a suit regarding immovable property, the property cannot be transferred to affect the rights of any party to the suit.

At a Glance
Subject Contract, Specific Relief, Property & NI Act
Difficulty Medium
Act Transfer of Property Act, 1882
Section Section 52 / Jayaram Mudaliar
Answer (A) Knowledge-Based
Paper AIBE XIII — December 2018
Navigation
← Q.72 ☰ All Questions Q.74 →
🎯 Mock Test
Progress in Paper
Q.73 100 questions

73% through paper

📖 Open Book — Reading Mode Transfer of Property Act, 1882