AIBE XIII — December 2018 — Q.73 (Transfer of Property Act, 1882)

Share Q.73:

Q.73

Contract, Specific Relief, Property & NI Act Medium Knowledge-Based

Bare Act Transfer of Property Act, 1882 · Section 52 / Jayaram Mudaliar

The doctrine of ‘Lis pendens’ was explained in the leading case of:

✓ Bellamy v. Sabine Answer

B Cooper v. Cooper

C Streatifised v. Streafield

D Tulk v. Moxbay

📋

Explanation & Strategy

Click any section to expand · only one open at a time

The doctrine of Lis Pendens (S.52 TPA — 'pending suit') was explained in Jayaram Mudaliar v. Ayyaswami. It provides that during pendency of a suit regarding immovable property, the property cannot be transferred to affect the rights of any party to the suit.

At a Glance

Subject Contract, Specific Relief, Property & NI Act

Difficulty Medium

Act Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Section Section 52 / Jayaram Mudaliar

Answer (A) Knowledge-Based

Paper AIBE XIII — December 2018

Navigation

← Q.72 ☰ All Questions Q.74 →

🎯 Mock Test

Progress in Paper

Q.73 100 questions

73% through paper

📖 Open Book — Reading Mode Transfer of Property Act, 1882 ↗ New Tab

📄

Mobile browsers only show page 1 of a PDF in-panel.
Open in a new tab to read all pages.

Open Transfer of Property Act, 1882 →