Share Q.56:
Q.56
Labour & Industrial Laws Medium Knowledge-Based
Bare Act Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 · Section 2(s)

In which case Supreme Court held that whether teachers are not workmen?

A Dharangadhara Chemical Work Ltd. v. State of Saurashtra, AIR 1957 SC 246
University of Delhi v. Ram Natlh, AIR 1963 SC 1873 Answer
C J.K. Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. v. L. T. AIR 1964 SC 737
D Sunderambal v. Government of Goa, AIR 1988 SC 1700.
📋

Explanation & Strategy

Click any section to expand · only one open at a time

The SC held that teachers are not 'workmen' under the Industrial Disputes Act in several cases. Teaching is a professional activity, not manual, clerical, or supervisory work as defined in S.2(s) of the ID Act.

At a Glance
Subject Labour & Industrial Laws
Difficulty Medium
Act Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Section Section 2(s)
Answer (B) Knowledge-Based
Paper AIBE XIV — September 2019
Progress in Paper
Q.56 100 questions

56% through paper

📖 Open Book — Reading Mode Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ↗ New Tab
📄

Mobile browsers only show page 1 of a PDF in-panel.
Open in a new tab to read all pages.

Open Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 →
📚 Carry these bare acts to the exam: Set 1 on Amazon ↗  ·  Set 2 on Amazon ↗
You're on Legistro
AIBE Prep is just one part of Legistro
India's advocate directory, court records, and legal tools — all free
⚖️
Advocate Directory
Find verified advocates by city, court & practice area
🏛️
Judge & Court Records
5,848 judge profiles with order history & disposal rates
🧮
Court Fee Calculator
State-wise court fees for 25+ states — gazette verified
📋
Join as Advocate — Free
Case diary, cause list, client management & verified profile
Explore Legistro →