Q.56
Labour & Industrial Laws Medium Knowledge-Based
Bare Act Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 · Section 2(s)

In which case Supreme Court held that whether teachers are not workmen?

A Dharangadhara Chemical Work Ltd. v. State of Saurashtra, AIR 1957 SC 246
University of Delhi v. Ram Natlh, AIR 1963 SC 1873 Answer
C J.K. Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. v. L. T. AIR 1964 SC 737
D Sunderambal v. Government of Goa, AIR 1988 SC 1700.
📋

Explanation & Strategy

Click any section to expand · only one open at a time

The SC held that teachers are not 'workmen' under the Industrial Disputes Act in several cases. Teaching is a professional activity, not manual, clerical, or supervisory work as defined in S.2(s) of the ID Act.

At a Glance
Subject Labour & Industrial Laws
Difficulty Medium
Act Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Section Section 2(s)
Answer (B) Knowledge-Based
Paper AIBE XIV — September 2019
Progress in Paper
Q.56 100 questions

56% through paper

📖 Open Book — Reading Mode Industrial Disputes Act, 1947