Assertion (A): Collateral transactions to wagering are valid. Reason (R): Only wagering agreements are declared void under section 30 of the Indian Contract Act. Codes:
Explanation & Strategy
Click any section to expand · only one open at a time
Wagering agreements are void under S.30 of the Indian Contract Act, but collateral transactions to wagering are valid and enforceable. If A borrows money from B to bet, B can recover the loan even though A used it for wagering. The collateral agreement (loan) stands independently.
Mobile browsers only show page 1 of a PDF in-panel.
Open in a new tab to read all pages.