Q.2
Constitutional Law Medium Knowledge-Based
Bare Act Constitution of India · Part III — Fundamental Rights

In which case did the Supreme Court hold that fundamental rights cannot be waived?

A Gopala vs. State of Madras
B Kameshwar Singh vs. State of Bihar
C Golaknath vs. State of Punjab
Basheshar Nath vs. I.T. Commissioner Answer
📋

Explanation & Strategy

Click any section to expand · only one open at a time

In Basheshar Nath vs. I.T. Commissioner (1959), the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution are not merely personal privileges — they embody public policy and constitutional mandate, and therefore cannot be waived or surrendered by any individual.

At a Glance
Subject Constitutional Law
Difficulty Medium
Act Constitution of India
Section Part III — Fundamental Rights
Answer (D) Knowledge-Based
Paper AIBE XIX — December 2024
Progress in Paper
Q.2 100 questions

2% through paper

📖 Open Book — Reading Mode Constitution of India